Mabsark
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
|
|
January 21, 2015, 04:53:50 PM |
|
LOL, you'll see within the next hour what a fool you've been.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
RussianRaibow
|
|
January 21, 2015, 05:49:43 PM |
|
I have challenged you in a bet about what you are claiming for last 2 pages... -snip-
I want to bet with you that...
1. 1KufA3z7mLntENepGKo9Ktu9S7qAL2oLF3 can not be proven as owned by the owner of 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec in any way by blockchain analysis.
2. Owner of 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec has no hand in the transaction link between 1F91HzJaQZ1WGU9NG2ZhFaXctZD6vMsV3L (pay in address) > 1GNmnxWkComFYF7k8EBeKtgQz2sprUGYvM.
How much you want to bet ?
Accept it or stop lying.From now on, I'll come back in every new page to let people know that you are simply carrying out a defamation campaign in the hope of reviving the dying AM hash. Talking to you all through the page regarding the same boring thing is sheer waste of time. I'll only post in a page twice if you can present something new. You should have balls to put your money on something that you are claiming to have evidence on...
|
I AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMER
|
|
|
Mabsark
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
|
|
January 21, 2015, 05:57:14 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
RussianRaibow
|
|
January 21, 2015, 06:09:02 PM |
|
WoW !!! You just did something new... and exactly this step is what I was expecting. Replied: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=932030.msg10230543#msg10230543
|
I AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMER
|
|
|
Mabsark
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
|
|
January 23, 2015, 06:03:04 AM Last edit: January 23, 2015, 06:30:29 AM by Mabsark |
|
Those transactions show that CMW is funnelling money to Eobot. If there was just 1 such transaction, that could be put down to an accident. When a third of the transactions from the very first payout involve money being funnelled to Eobot, that can only be deliberate.
The fact you refuse to acknowledge that just makes you seem like you are involved in this scam. The fact you actively defend this proven scam of a company make that involvement seem far more likely.
So, RussianRainbow/SpanishSoldier/GermanGiant, are you involved in the operation of this scam?
|
|
|
|
RussianRaibow
|
|
January 23, 2015, 12:16:35 PM |
|
Those transactions show that CMW is funnelling money to Eobot. If there was just 1 such transaction, that could be put down to an accident. When a third of the transactions from the very first payout involve money being funnelled to Eobot, that can only be deliberate.
The fact you refuse to acknowledge that just makes you seem like you are involved in this scam. The fact you actively defend this proven scam of a company make that involvement seem far more likely.
So, RussianRainbow/SpanishSoldier/GermanGiant, are you involved in the operation of this scam?
I have challenged you in a bet about what you are claiming for last 2 pages... -snip-
I want to bet with you that...
1. 1KufA3z7mLntENepGKo9Ktu9S7qAL2oLF3 can not be proven as owned by the owner of 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec in any way by blockchain analysis.
2. Owner of 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec has no hand in the transaction link between 1F91HzJaQZ1WGU9NG2ZhFaXctZD6vMsV3L (pay in address) > 1GNmnxWkComFYF7k8EBeKtgQz2sprUGYvM.
How much you want to bet ?
I am simply asking you to bet on something that you are so confidently claiming as evidence. Why are you spooked ? I wont give you the technical explanation unless you accept the bet. See you in the next page unless you can come up with something new. Keep the hate campaign on as long as the retard OP allows you to do so in a self moderated thread... Accept the bet or stop lying.
|
I AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMER
|
|
|
Puppet
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1040
|
|
January 23, 2015, 12:29:19 PM |
|
Lets have an escrowed bet if cloudmining website will honor its contract for the next 6 months. Are you up for that spanishrainbow?
|
|
|
|
kotwica666
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1035
|
|
January 23, 2015, 12:31:22 PM |
|
"spanishrainbow"
|
|
|
|
Dilemma
|
|
January 23, 2015, 12:33:29 PM |
|
spanishrainbow?
it's funny but he said true... let have an escrowed..
|
|
|
|
RussianRaibow
|
|
January 23, 2015, 12:40:18 PM |
|
-snip-
I want to bet with you that...
1. 1KufA3z7mLntENepGKo9Ktu9S7qAL2oLF3 can not be proven as owned by the owner of 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec in any way by blockchain analysis.
2. Owner of 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec has no hand in the transaction link between 1F91HzJaQZ1WGU9NG2ZhFaXctZD6vMsV3L (pay in address) > 1GNmnxWkComFYF7k8EBeKtgQz2sprUGYvM.
How much you want to bet ?
So Muppet, you are accepting that you were lying all through and can not accept the bet above ?
|
I AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMER
|
|
|
tmfp
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1737
"Common rogue from Russia with a bare ass."
|
|
January 23, 2015, 12:47:49 PM |
|
I see minethatcloud.com is redirecting to your site. Are they doing this with your permission? If so, what is the relationship between Cloudmining.website and minethatcloud.com? Will minethatcloud contractees become .website clients?
Thanks.
|
Extraordinary Claims require Extraordinary Evidence
|
|
|
kotwica666
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1035
|
|
January 23, 2015, 12:48:40 PM |
|
Here is three things: 1) Example above - that 1KufA3z7mLntENepGKo9Ktu9S7qAL2oLF3 can not be proven as owned by the owner of 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec in any way by blockchain analysis. 2) Mabsark example: "Cloud Mining Website is quite clearly sending customers funds to Eobot." 3) and Puppet bet: Lets have an escrowed bet if cloudmining website will honor its contract for the next 6 months Guys - You have to decide! Ps. I go to prepare popcorn
|
|
|
|
RussianRaibow
|
|
January 23, 2015, 01:04:22 PM |
|
I see minethatcloud.com is redirecting to your site. Are they doing this with your permission? If so, what is the relationship between Cloudmining.website and minethatcloud.com? Will minethatcloud contractees become .website clients?
Thanks.
LoLz... this is an interesting development. Now, anyone will create a scam, shut down and redirect to another website. Now the redirected website will be responsible for answering !!! From when redirection requires permission ? Here is three things: 1) Example above - that 1KufA3z7mLntENepGKo9Ktu9S7qAL2oLF3 can not be proven as owned by the owner of 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec in any way by blockchain analysis. 2) Mabsark example: "Cloud Mining Website is quite clearly sending customers funds to Eobot." 3) and Puppet bet: Lets have an escrowed bet if cloudmining website will honor its contract for the next 6 months Guys - You have to decide! Ps. I go to prepare popcorn Muppet army has already spooked about the initial claims he/they used to have. Check this when I first countered his lies... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=843417.msg10196443#msg10196443Now, he is totally silent about those claims and claiming something new. He does not even have the guts to accept a bet for what he is claiming to have evidence on !!!
|
I AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMER
|
|
|
Puppet
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1040
|
|
January 23, 2015, 01:06:56 PM |
|
-snip-
I want to bet with you that...
1. 1KufA3z7mLntENepGKo9Ktu9S7qAL2oLF3 can not be proven as owned by the owner of 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec in any way by blockchain analysis.
2. Owner of 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec has no hand in the transaction link between 1F91HzJaQZ1WGU9NG2ZhFaXctZD6vMsV3L (pay in address) > 1GNmnxWkComFYF7k8EBeKtgQz2sprUGYvM.
How much you want to bet ?
So Muppet, you are accepting that you were lying all through and can not accept the bet above ? Im not in the least interested in the above bet, because I never made the claim, never looked in to it, and most importantly, its impossible to prove a negative in an unbound system, so its a ridiculous bet. Might as well ask to prove there is no teapot orbiting the sun. No, I cant prove its not there, so if you want to believe its there, be my guest. So now just answer my question: will you accept a bet they will or wont run off with the money over the next 6 month?
|
|
|
|
tmfp
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1737
"Common rogue from Russia with a bare ass."
|
|
January 23, 2015, 01:17:03 PM |
|
I see minethatcloud.com is redirecting to your site. Are they doing this with your permission? If so, what is the relationship between Cloudmining.website and minethatcloud.com? Will minethatcloud contractees become .website clients?
Thanks.
LoLz... this is an interesting development. Now, anyone will create a scam, shut down and redirect to another website. Now the redirected website will be responsible for answering !!! From when redirection requires permission ? I fully understand that anyone can direct a site to another without permission. Sometimes it can indicate that one business has been taken over by another. That's why I asked .website management for clarification, a simple answer to avoid confusion for minethatcloud account holders. Do you speak for the management of .website?
|
Extraordinary Claims require Extraordinary Evidence
|
|
|
Mabsark
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
|
|
January 23, 2015, 01:20:27 PM |
|
-snip-
I want to bet with you that...
1. 1KufA3z7mLntENepGKo9Ktu9S7qAL2oLF3 can not be proven as owned by the owner of 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec in any way by blockchain analysis.
2. Owner of 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec has no hand in the transaction link between 1F91HzJaQZ1WGU9NG2ZhFaXctZD6vMsV3L (pay in address) > 1GNmnxWkComFYF7k8EBeKtgQz2sprUGYvM.
How much you want to bet ?
So Muppet, you are accepting that you were lying all through and can not accept the bet above ? Fist of all, I've told you repeatedly to shove your unwinnable bet up your arse. Second, I never said that 1KufA3z7mLntENepGKo9Ktu9S7qAL2oLF3 could be proven to be the owner of 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec by blockchain analysis. I simply claimed it was the owner because that's what the evidence strongly suggests. With 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec being CMW's incoming payment collection address, it stands to reason that payments to it will be from CMW owned addresses which I've shown to be true for numerous other addresses. If the input addresses belong to CMW and one of the two output addresses belongs to CMW, given all the other evidence provided and the very distinct repeating pattern of the transactions, it's bloody obvious that 1KufA3z7mLntENepGKo9Ktu9S7qAL2oLF3 is also owned by CMW. Thirdly, I've already shown that 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec was involved in the transaction between 1F91HzJaQZ1WGU9NG2ZhFaXctZD6vMsV3L and 1GNmnxWkComFYF7k8EBeKtgQz2sprUGYvM, as well as a shit load of other transactions involving CMW addresses and that Eobot address. Fourthly, what lies have I told? Point to a specific one. Lastly, who gives a shit about those 2 chains though when I just provided 9 chains with that very same distinct flow of funds. Basically, you'd have to be a SimplemindedSpanishSoldier, a RetardedRussianRainbow or a GullibleGermanGiant to ignore such evidence.
|
|
|
|
RussianRaibow
|
|
January 23, 2015, 01:28:51 PM |
|
-snip-
I want to bet with you that...
1. 1KufA3z7mLntENepGKo9Ktu9S7qAL2oLF3 can not be proven as owned by the owner of 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec in any way by blockchain analysis.
2. Owner of 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec has no hand in the transaction link between 1F91HzJaQZ1WGU9NG2ZhFaXctZD6vMsV3L (pay in address) > 1GNmnxWkComFYF7k8EBeKtgQz2sprUGYvM.
How much you want to bet ?
So Muppet, you are accepting that you were lying all through and can not accept the bet above ? Im not in the least interested in the above bet, because I never made the claim, never looked in to it, and most importantly, its impossible to prove a negative in an unbound system, so its a ridiculous bet. Might as well ask to prove there is no teapot orbiting the sun. No, I cant prove its not there, so if you want to believe its there, be my guest. So now just answer my question: will you accept a bet they will or wont run off with the money over the next 6 month? It is actually the other way. I am interested to prove that it does not get proved from the given transaction that fund has moved from cloud mining address to Eobot. Why is you/your alt/your friend spooked to accept that ? If it can not be proven, then what is point of screaming everywhere that you have a proof that it is sending fund to Eobot ? Either u have the proof or u dont. Which one is true ? Your bet is like, asking to bet in December whether CEX.io will cease cloud mining operation or not. Though there is nothing wrong in it, how am I supposed to know a certain company's management decision ? I am not interested in gambling here. I am interested in betting on something that is clear from the blockchain.
|
I AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMER
|
|
|
RussianRaibow
|
|
January 23, 2015, 01:32:43 PM |
|
I see minethatcloud.com is redirecting to your site. Are they doing this with your permission? If so, what is the relationship between Cloudmining.website and minethatcloud.com? Will minethatcloud contractees become .website clients?
Thanks.
LoLz... this is an interesting development. Now, anyone will create a scam, shut down and redirect to another website. Now the redirected website will be responsible for answering !!! From when redirection requires permission ? I fully understand that anyone can direct a site to another without permission. Sometimes it can indicate that one business has been taken over by another. That's why I asked .website management for clarification, a simple answer to avoid confusion for minethatcloud account holders. Do you speak for the management of .website? To get management response, better ask in their forum... http://forum.cloudmining.website
|
I AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMERI AM A SCAMMER
|
|
|
Puppet
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1040
|
|
January 23, 2015, 01:39:33 PM |
|
Your bet is like, asking to bet in December whether CEX.io will cease cloud mining operation or not. No, its like asking if they will honor their contracts in December, a bet Im quite willing to accept for cex.io too, or any company I listed as legit. Of course Id be betting the other way for legitimate companies. Why would you not accept such a bet for cloudmining.website, or what odds would you require to accept it?
|
|
|
|
|