VOD should be removed from default trust for systematic abuse of his position

[Vod]

I seriously wish I never did ask, as I wouldn't have to deal with you and Vod.

I gave you a second chance!  I removed your negative feedback.  You promised not to ask for another loan for 30 days.  You had what you wanted - it was as if you never asked!

Then your greed took over, you said I'm not going to honor my word, and you asked for another loan.  Your brought this on yourself.  

TC seems to think I should give you another chance, so I'm willing to review this case in 30-60 days or so (whenever my sailing schedule allows) to see if you are exhibiting scammy behavior by asking for larger and larger loans on BTCJam.  You will have to choose which is more important - your reputation here, or your scam there.

But I would be a fool to remove your negative feedback now.  (i.e. I'm not giving you another $100 up front.)  You have already proven you don't stick to your word.

I'm sorry that I did not follow YOUR rules for how I use my own personal time on other sites.

If you don't want me to interfere with you on other sites, don't make an agreement with me that involves other sites.  

So do what you wish... I'll let the community decide how far I need to fight you to prove my innocence and my keep my own rep.

You are not innocent.  You lied when you broke your agreement with me.  When dealing with an irreversible currency, lies are not a way to build rep.

[SavellM]

I can save you the trouble for the next 60days. I'm going to plan more investments as I have other ideas and things I would like to deal with, like starting HashNest.

But if you think that in 60days I continue to pay off any and all my loans (of which I make no pact with you or bitcointalk) then I leave you out to chose your own path. If in the future you remove my negative feedback I will remove mine.

For the record I still 100% think you are going over your bounds by abusing the trust system here!
Just to reiterate in case you miss it, I am NOT asking Bitcointalk for any loans I may or may not be taking out!

If at any point I default on a loan feel free to label me a scam and give me negative feedback. BUT until such a time as I am late on payments I do not deserve your negativity! Innocent until proven guilty!

Lastly I thank TC for his reasonableness!

[XinXan]

I can save you the trouble for the next 60days. I'm going to plan more investments as I have other ideas and things I would like to deal with, like starting HashNest.

But if you think that in 60days I continue to pay off any and all my loans (of which I make no pact with you or bitcointalk) then I leave you out to chose your own path. If in the future you remove my negative feedback I will remove mine.

For the record I still 100% think you are going over your bounds by abusing the trust system here!
Just to reiterate in case you miss it, I am NOT asking Bitcointalk for any loans I may or may not be taking out!

If at any point I default on a loan feel free to label me a scam and give me negative feedback. BUT until such a time as I am late on payments I do not deserve your negativity! Innocent until proven guilty!

Lastly I thank TC for his reasonableness!

Yes you do, you deserve the negative trust like everybody else. Have you seen the lending section? Any newbie that asks for a loan without collateral gets red trust, is how it is. Seems like vod removed your neg feebdack once and you decided to troll and you still think you are right?? You are either dellusional or stupid.

Also in the trust ratings it clearly specifies that you can leave a neg feedback if you believe that user will scam, so it doesnt have to wait for you to actually scam.

[jonald_fyookball]

I seriously wish I never did ask, as I wouldn't have to deal with you and Vod.

I gave you a second chance!  I removed your negative feedback.  You promised not to ask for another loan for 30 days.  You had what you wanted - it was as if you never asked!

Then your greed took over, you said I'm not going to honor my word, and you asked for another loan.  Your brought this on yourself.  

TC seems to think I should give you another chance, so I'm willing to review this case in 30-60 days or so (whenever my sailing schedule allows) to see if you are exhibiting scammy behavior by asking for larger and larger loans on BTCJam.  You will have to choose which is more important - your reputation here, or your scam there.

But I would be a fool to remove your negative feedback now.  (i.e. I'm not giving you another $100 up front.)  You have already proven you don't stick to your word.

I'm sorry that I did not follow YOUR rules for how I use my own personal time on other sites.

If you don't want me to interfere with you on other sites, don't make an agreement with me that involves other sites.  

So do what you wish... I'll let the community decide how far I need to fight you to prove my innocence and my keep my own rep.

You are not innocent.  You lied when you broke your agreement with me.  When dealing with an irreversible currency, lies are not a way to build rep.

Vod can you paste where he agreed not to post on BTCJam?

[pissedoff]

I seriously wish I never did ask, as I wouldn't have to deal with you and Vod.

I gave you a second chance!  I removed your negative feedback.  You promised not to ask for another loan for 30 days.  You had what you wanted - it was as if you never asked!

Then your greed took over, you said I'm not going to honor my word, and you asked for another loan.  Your brought this on yourself.  

TC seems to think I should give you another chance, so I'm willing to review this case in 30-60 days or so (whenever my sailing schedule allows) to see if you are exhibiting scammy behavior by asking for larger and larger loans on BTCJam.  You will have to choose which is more important - your reputation here, or your scam there.

But I would be a fool to remove your negative feedback now.  (i.e. I'm not giving you another $100 up front.)  You have already proven you don't stick to your word.

I'm sorry that I did not follow YOUR rules for how I use my own personal time on other sites.

If you don't want me to interfere with you on other sites, don't make an agreement with me that involves other sites.  

So do what you wish... I'll let the community decide how far I need to fight you to prove my innocence and my keep my own rep.

You are not innocent.  You lied when you broke your agreement with me.  When dealing with an irreversible currency, lies are not a way to build rep.

Vod can you paste where he agreed not to post on BTCJam?

he agreed not to ask for a loan did he not? that means anywhere not just on this forum.

[jonald_fyookball]

I don't know what he said.  lets see exactly what was said.

[Muhammed Zakir]

I don't know what he said.  lets see exactly what was said.

Ok Vod if you say so.
Almost like you know me so well, and know exactly what I have invested and traded with.

But its ok, lets agree to disagree and end this here.
You have got your wishes, I have removed my listing and I will not post anything until the 15th June.

[legendster]

This is ludicrous if you ask me.

Why should VOD be the dictator of when someone gets to ask for a loan ?

Say if his father has an accident next day and exhausts his savings / insurance and asking for a loan on Jam is the ONLY choice he is left with, VOD can come in and label him as a scammer, like WTF ?

Its like appointing VOD the authority from where Save has to get 'Permission' before asking for a loan (here or anywhere).

Yes I ve been here for a while and I have seen how much scammers have tormented the people on this forum and on Jam. But what the hell ? Why are people gonna get a rating BEFORE a scam happens ?

This shit is so Minority Report...

[Muhammed Zakir]

This is ludicrous if you ask me.

Why should VOD be the dictator of when someone gets to ask for a loan ?

Say if his father has an accident next day and exhausts his savings / insurance and asking for a loan on Jam is the ONLY choice he is left with, VOD can come in and label him as a scammer, like WTF ?

Its like appointing VOD the authority from where Save has to get 'Permission' before asking for a loan (here or anywhere).

Yes I ve been here for a while and I have seen how much scammers have tormented the people on this forum and on Jam. But what the hell ? Why are people gonna get a rating BEFORE a scam happens ?

This shit is so Minority Report...

Like I said, "trust" is the issue here.

[jonald_fyookball]

This is ludicrous if you ask me.

Why should VOD be the dictator of when someone gets to ask for a loan ?

Say if his father has an accident next day and exhausts his savings / insurance and asking for a loan on Jam is the ONLY choice he is left with, VOD can come in and label him as a scammer, like WTF ?

Its like appointing VOD the authority from where Save has to get 'Permission' before asking for a loan (here or anywhere).

Yes I ve been here for a while and I have seen how much scammers have tormented the people on this forum and on Jam. But what the hell ? Why are people gonna get a rating BEFORE a scam happens ?

This shit is so Minority Report...

Vod doesn't have the power to stop someone posting on BTJam or even here.
All he can do is leave negative trust.

[legendster]

This is ludicrous if you ask me.

Why should VOD be the dictator of when someone gets to ask for a loan ?

Say if his father has an accident next day and exhausts his savings / insurance and asking for a loan on Jam is the ONLY choice he is left with, VOD can come in and label him as a scammer, like WTF ?

Its like appointing VOD the authority from where Save has to get 'Permission' before asking for a loan (here or anywhere).

Yes I ve been here for a while and I have seen how much scammers have tormented the people on this forum and on Jam. But what the hell ? Why are people gonna get a rating BEFORE a scam happens ?

This shit is so Minority Report...

Vod doesn't have the power to stop someone posting on BTJam or even here.
All he can do is leave negative trust.

Which creates trust issues in a trade situation. Would you trade with someone who has a red trust if the same rates & conditions are available from a green trust guy ? No, and even if you do it would be through escrows. Offcourse everyone should use escrow but to start trusting a guy who's been slandered once by someone is harder than trusting someone who has a trust rating as squeaky clean as a baby's butt 

Go to Jam, once someone is negatively rated his chances of getting a loan drops significantly.

[jonald_fyookball]

I agree, but is it really slander for savell?  we do have a rule here (no collateral, no loan) and he broke that rule, then broke an agreement with Vod after that, right?

Vod didn't invent that rule.

now on the other hand the poster was registered for a year , not just some random newbie
but then again it was a huge amount...so I don't think the situation is that crazy.

[Vod]

Vod can you paste where he agreed not to post on BTCJam?

The link is just a few posts above this one.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=915823.msg11484861#msg11484861

[Snagglebone]

This is ludicrous if you ask me.

Why should VOD be the dictator of when someone gets to ask for a loan ?

Say if his father has an accident next day and exhausts his savings / insurance and asking for a loan on Jam is the ONLY choice he is left with, VOD can come in and label him as a scammer, like WTF ?

Its like appointing VOD the authority from where Save has to get 'Permission' before asking for a loan (here or anywhere).

Yes I ve been here for a while and I have seen how much scammers have tormented the people on this forum and on Jam. But what the hell ? Why are people gonna get a rating BEFORE a scam happens ?

This shit is so Minority Report...

Like I said, "trust" is the issue here.

The trust is fine. I don't have any problems with VOD leaving negative trust to people for whatever reason he wants... (well, I do actually, but that's an entirely different argument). The problem is that he's in the DefaultTrust. If DefaultTrust went away, there wouldn't be an issue, but since it's here and VOD has clearly shown he's abused his position numerous times (and continues to abuse it) he should be removed from DefaultTrust, which is really the root of the issue here. He's demonstrated time and again that he's unsuitable to be given the power of DefaultTrust, yet he continues to wantonly abuse it and no action is taken.

[tidus1097]

VOD is a dickhead!

oh no now he will give me -rep 

This guy scammer: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=508087


 phutto chonthicha (The recipient of this payment is Non-U.S. - Verified)
Email:
 thacucaracha@gmail.com

Wonder why? You're a lying pos. He knew this about you. Hence is why you got -neg rep'ed.

[Vod]

VOD is a dickhead!

oh no now he will give me -rep 

This guy scammer: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=508087


 phutto chonthicha (The recipient of this payment is Non-U.S. - Verified)
Email:
 thacucaracha@gmail.com

Wonder why? You're a lying pos. He knew this about you. Hence is why you got -neg rep'ed.

It seems most people who have a problem with me turn out to be scammers.  Go figure.   

[SavellM]

I don't know what he said.  lets see exactly what was said.

Ok Vod if you say so.
Almost like you know me so well, and know exactly what I have invested and traded with.

But its ok, lets agree to disagree and end this here.
You have got your wishes, I have removed my listing and I will not post anything until the 15th June.

Like I said show me anywhere I have POSTED ie. Forum asking for a loan?
There is no solid ground, as it could mean not asking for another loan, and it could mean not asking on the forums here for another loan.

And I have not asking on the forums for a loan.

Still the issue is default trust and the abuse of this controlling the web.

[Muhammed Zakir]

I don't know what he said.  lets see exactly what was said.

Ok Vod if you say so.
Almost like you know me so well, and know exactly what I have invested and traded with.

But its ok, lets agree to disagree and end this here.
You have got your wishes, I have removed my listing and I will not post anything until the 15th June.

Like I said show me anywhere I have POSTED ie. Forum asking for a loan?
There is no solid ground, as it could mean not asking for another loan, and it could mean not asking on the forums here for another loan.

And I have not asking on the forums for a loan.

Still the issue is default trust and the abuse of this controlling the web.

You posted the listing in this forum. That is indirectly requesting for a loan here.

"You have got your wishes, I have removed my listing and I will not post anything until the 15th June" -- it clearly shows you said you won't post anything.

[SavellM]

I don't know what he said.  lets see exactly what was said.

Ok Vod if you say so.
Almost like you know me so well, and know exactly what I have invested and traded with.

But its ok, lets agree to disagree and end this here.
You have got your wishes, I have removed my listing and I will not post anything until the 15th June.

Like I said show me anywhere I have POSTED ie. Forum asking for a loan?
There is no solid ground, as it could mean not asking for another loan, and it could mean not asking on the forums here for another loan.

And I have not asking on the forums for a loan.

Still the issue is default trust and the abuse of this controlling the web.

You posted the listing in this forum. That is indirectly requesting for a loan here.

"You have got your wishes, I have removed my listing and I will not post anything until the 15th June" -- it clearly shows you said you won't post anything.

Yes I posted once right at the beginning... And then removed the thread and removed my listing.
And said I will not post again till 15th...

As I am saying this could mean I will not post on the forum asking for another loan... Have I asked for another loan on this forum since the first debacle?
No I have not. That is all im saying.

Or if you really want to take it for the words they are I should not be writing on this forum at all about anything till the 15th.

[Muhammed Zakir]

I don't know what he said.  lets see exactly what was said.

Ok Vod if you say so.
Almost like you know me so well, and know exactly what I have invested and traded with.

But its ok, lets agree to disagree and end this here.
You have got your wishes, I have removed my listing and I will not post anything until the 15th June.

Like I said show me anywhere I have POSTED ie. Forum asking for a loan?
There is no solid ground, as it could mean not asking for another loan, and it could mean not asking on the forums here for another loan.

And I have not asking on the forums for a loan.

Still the issue is default trust and the abuse of this controlling the web.

You posted the listing in this forum. That is indirectly requesting for a loan here.

"You have got your wishes, I have removed my listing and I will not post anything until the 15th June" -- it clearly shows you said you won't post anything.

Yes I posted once right at the beginning... And then removed the thread and removed my listing.
And said I will not post again till 15th...

As I am saying this could mean I will not post on the forum asking for another loan... Have I asked for another loan on this forum since the first debacle?
No I have not. That is all im saying.

Or if you really want to take it for the words they are I should not be writing on this forum at all about anything till the 15th.

You said you removed your listing and you will not post anything until the 15th June. From that, I understood that you will not post anything in BTCJam. I think most people understand in the same way or did I understand it in the wrong way?