[ANN][Blocknet] The internet of blockchains | XBridge | Non-Deprecated Thread

[iCEBREAKER]

[iCEBREAKER]

Since the original thread has been "deprecated" I've made a new one.

Here we are allowed to say things besides the cheerleading that Synechist demands on his still-maintained but somehow "deprecated" post.

[S4VV4S]

Possibly hacked account.

Posted the following feedback on my account: "Constantly posts lies about TECSHARE in an effort to have him removed from the default trust list. Honest discussion is one thing, but he just posts BS with absolutely no basis. Not trustworthy."

TECSHARE isn't on the default trust list. Not sure why this user would be lying about me in this way.

Care to shed some light here?

Nice trust you have there....

I know the trust system is broken but Vod is a respected member here and wouldn't lie about such things....

EDIT: Could you also give more info on what the hell Blocknet is?
Is it a side-chain that holds block-chains? 

[iCEBREAKER]

Possibly hacked account.

Posted the following feedback on my account: "Constantly posts lies about TECSHARE in an effort to have him removed from the default trust list. Honest discussion is one thing, but he just posts BS with absolutely no basis. Not trustworthy."

TECSHARE isn't on the default trust list. Not sure why this user would be lying about me in this way.

Care to shed some light here?

Nice trust you have there....

I know the trust system is broken but Vod is a respected member here and wouldn't lie about such things....

EDIT: Could you also give more info on what the hell Blocknet is?
Is it a side-chain that holds block-chains? 

A "blocknet" is a framework to enable interoperability between blockchains.  It has nothing to do with sidechains (although sidechains may make it obsolete).

Fiat lux:

Hmmm, I would say this is probably not appropriate. He claims that it is a possibly hacked account, however his password was not changed in the last 30 days.

I think that Icebreaker's trust left for Vod is probably a misunderstanding of the entire situation, however he is entitled to his opinion about Vod's left feedback for TECHSHARE.

I think Vod should remove his trust for Icebreaker as this is more of an example of him trying to silence critics.

I would say this is somewhat of an example of leaving trust because of "trust abuse" and anyone who leaves those kinds of reports should not have any of their trust reports relied upon 

My account has not been hacked.

I've been here longer than Vod.

This is clearly an abuse of his default trust, which isn't supposed to be used for petulant tit-for-tat retaliation.

Like I said it is probably not appropiate. If you can provide a signed message from an address from an old unedited post then it would squash any hacking claim and if he wants to remain reputable then he will need to remove the trust. Although I do not think that should be necessary.

I do think this is essentially leaving trust because they are engaging in "trust abuse" and any trust left for this reason makes the person's trust left be unreliable

Vod didn't make the refutable claim that my account was in fact hacked.  He used the slimey, non-refutable "possibly hacked account" wording instead.

Every account on this board is "possibly hacked."  Even if I signed an old address, he could still weasel around that by claiming my private key was also "possibly hacked."

Look at my recent posts; they are written with the same pompous bombast they always have been.   

Vod is just being a dick, not making an honest accusation that he could reasonably believe to be true.

[S4VV4S]

OK, so is inter-coin transactions possible with this?

I mean, can I use my LTC wallet to sent LTC yet arrive as BTC to the receiver?

[infinitechaos]

OK, so is inter-coin transactions possible with this?

I mean, can I use my LTC wallet to sent LTC yet arrive as BTC to the receiver?

The OP here is just trolling the Blocknet project by copying the official thread into his own un-moderated thread.

You may find the official thread here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=829576.0

You may also wish to follow Blocknet on Slack:

http://goo.gl/forms/UkViMl2fKn

And, yes, when the project is completed you will be able to send coin A and have it arrive as coin B.

[S4VV4S]

OK, so is inter-coin transactions possible with this?

I mean, can I use my LTC wallet to sent LTC yet arrive as BTC to the receiver?

The OP here is just trolling the Blocknet project by copying the official thread into his own un-moderated thread.

You may find the official thread here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=829576.0

You may also wish to follow Blocknet on Slack:

http://goo.gl/forms/UkViMl2fKn

And, yes, when the project is completed you will be able to send coin A and have it arrive as coin B.

Thanks bro.
Checking the official thread now 

[synechist]

Please make it clear that this thread is non-official.

I also object to your copying my work for your OP, because it looks like you're trying to impersonate the official thread. I'd appreciate it if you'd remove it.

[iCEBREAKER]

OK, so is inter-coin transactions possible with this?

I mean, can I use my LTC wallet to sent LTC yet arrive as BTC to the receiver?

Blocknet doesn't work with real coins like BTC and LTC.

It's just a way to send ScamCoins and receive ShitCoins.

[Xaltotun]

OK, so is inter-coin transactions possible with this?

I mean, can I use my LTC wallet to sent LTC yet arrive as BTC to the receiver?

Blocknet doesn't work with real coins like BTC and LTC.

It's just a way to send ScamCoins and receive ShitCoins.

No way! You mean a coin under development doesn't have full functionality yet?

[UNO_owner]

This was deleted from the moderated thread, so I thought I'd post it here.

There is simply no question UNITY is the far superior product at this point in time but there is plenty of room for solid competition in the space, so I monitor what is going on here - and if BlockNET ever shows something besides PR of every minor step along the way to a functional release, I might actually buy some.  There is no doubt in my mind that this was designed as a pump and dump scheme that backfired to the detriment of actual investors, but as certain storyteller recently shared with all of us, scam coins can actually turn into real coins on occasion.  If this is one that does, I will be interested in participating.

No doubt in your mind?  What have you based that on?

The fact that SuperNET v1 works and is about to be released (not to mention paying about 7% in dividends already) while BlockNET remains vaporware.

You are incorrect. Perhaps you missed this release.

Prototype P2P protocol enabling communication between nodes on different blockchains: https://github.com/atcsecure/xhub

Get with the program sir. Working code. Open source. Non-vaporware project.
And it was NEVER originally conceived as a pump. It was conceived as a B2B-focussed initiative. Look up Dan's posts. He's publicly stated that when Bobsurplus approached him about a pump, he turned him down and protected the Blocknet from him.

Who do you think you are kidding synechist?  I didn't miss your shiny PR there.  You are so far away from a functional product it is laughable.  There are 100,000 problems yet to solve that could destroy this project permanently at any moment.  As I said, PM me when you have something worthwhile and quit trying to pump the price by putting out a press release about every step forward along the way.

And maybe Dan did "protect" the Blocknet from Bob.  But only because he was already working with Prom to the same ends. 

[S4VV4S]

This was deleted from the moderated thread, so I thought I'd post it here.

There is simply no question UNITY is the far superior product at this point in time but there is plenty of room for solid competition in the space, so I monitor what is going on here - and if BlockNET ever shows something besides PR of every minor step along the way to a functional release, I might actually buy some.  There is no doubt in my mind that this was designed as a pump and dump scheme that backfired to the detriment of actual investors, but as certain storyteller recently shared with all of us, scam coins can actually turn into real coins on occasion.  If this is one that does, I will be interested in participating.

No doubt in your mind?  What have you based that on?

The fact that SuperNET v1 works and is about to be released (not to mention paying about 7% in dividends already) while BlockNET remains vaporware.

You are incorrect. Perhaps you missed this release.

Prototype P2P protocol enabling communication between nodes on different blockchains: https://github.com/atcsecure/xhub

Get with the program sir. Working code. Open source. Non-vaporware project.
And it was NEVER originally conceived as a pump. It was conceived as a B2B-focussed initiative. Look up Dan's posts. He's publicly stated that when Bobsurplus approached him about a pump, he turned him down and protected the Blocknet from him.

Who do you think you are kidding synechist?  I didn't miss your shiny PR there.  You are so far away from a functional product it is laughable.  There are 100,000 problems yet to solve that could destroy this project permanently at any moment.  As I said, PM me when you have something worthwhile and quit trying to pump the price by putting out a press release about every step forward along the way.

And maybe Dan did "protect" the Blocknet from Bob.  But only because he was already working with Prom to the same ends.  

Hmmmm....

This is interesting.....

So the dev team didn't do anything yet?

Have they thought about hiring Chinese devs to do the job?  

Oh, and SuperNet has been in BitNet/VPNCoin for a while now.
Check my sig for official thread  

[iCEBREAKER]

OK, so is inter-coin transactions possible with this?

I mean, can I use my LTC wallet to sent LTC yet arrive as BTC to the receiver?

Blocknet doesn't work with real coins like BTC and LTC.

It's just a way to send ScamCoins and receive ShitCoins.

No way! You mean a coin under development doesn't have full functionality yet?

All (non-abandoned) coins are "under development."  If Blocknet intends to include BTC and LTC, they haven't told anyone.

[sugarboy321]

OK, so is inter-coin transactions possible with this?

I mean, can I use my LTC wallet to sent LTC yet arrive as BTC to the receiver?

Blocknet doesn't work with real coins like BTC and LTC.

It's just a way to send ScamCoins and receive ShitCoins.

No way! You mean a coin under development doesn't have full functionality yet?

All (non-abandoned) coins are "under development."  If Blocknet intends to include BTC and LTC, they haven't told anyone.

Nice trust ratings there Ice

[UNO_owner]

Hmmmm....

This is interesting.....

So the dev team didn't do anything yet?

Have they thought about hiring Chinese devs to do the job?  

Oh, and SuperNet has been in BitNet/VPNCoin for a while now.
Check my sig for official thread  

I never said they haven't done anything.  Obviously they are working towards a release.  Here's an analogy:  Picture the english alphabet.  A-Z.  A is the initial idea, Z is the first release.  BlockNET is on E, but spending time, energy, and effort publicizing every letter they hit a long the way.  All while deleting non-trolling valid criticisms from their fanboy run thread. 

[S4VV4S]

Hmmmm....

This is interesting.....

So the dev team didn't do anything yet?

Have they thought about hiring Chinese devs to do the job?  

Oh, and SuperNet has been in BitNet/VPNCoin for a while now.
Check my sig for official thread  

I never said they haven't done anything.  Obviously they are working towards a release.  Here's an analogy:  Picture the english alphabet.  A-Z.  A is the initial idea, Z is the first release.  BlockNET is on E, but spending time, energy, and effort publicizing every letter they hit a long the way.  All while deleting non-trolling valid criticisms from their fanboy run thread. 

Gotcha! 

[iCEBREAKER]

OK, so is inter-coin transactions possible with this?

I mean, can I use my LTC wallet to sent LTC yet arrive as BTC to the receiver?

Blocknet doesn't work with real coins like BTC and LTC.

It's just a way to send ScamCoins and receive ShitCoins.

No way! You mean a coin under development doesn't have full functionality yet?

All (non-abandoned) coins are "under development."  If Blocknet intends to include BTC and LTC, they haven't told anyone.

Nice trust ratings there Ice

Thanks for your concern.  Vod apologized to me for abusing his default trust status and removed the negative feedback.

Meanwhile, XC continues its death spiral on all of $1k volume.   

[sugarboy321]

Oh yeah, here is Supernets SLACK account.

SuperNET Slack log (open channels): http://104.236.15.119:8086/logs/
Get a SuperNET Slack invite by sending a mail to info@supernet.org or a PM to noashh or jl777.

To paraphrase icebreakers own words anyone any team who uses slack are a bunch of cultist cheerleaders.

And let me remind you that this is a Supernet and Blocknet thread. It is not a XC thread.

I do not need to remind you since you are the one who made it Icebreaker.

[iCEBREAKER]

Oh yeah, here is Supernets SLACK account.

SuperNET Slack log (open channels): http://104.236.15.119:8086/logs/
Get a SuperNET Slack invite by sending a mail to info@supernet.org or a PM to noashh or jl777.

To paraphrase icebreakers own words anyone any team who uses slack are a bunch of cultist cheerleaders.

No more comments about my trust level?   

Slack is fine as an appendix to this forum.

What is suspicious is refusing to participate here, except to delete non-cheerleading comments in a supposedly "deprecated" [ANN].

[sugarboy321]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inacX37Ix8g&feature=youtu.be

Blocknet starts at 12:35.

Boy, these guys are working hard on this so called scam.