Bitcoin Forum
August 19, 2017, 11:40:47 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.14.2  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 [30] 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Bitcoinica MtGox account compromised  (Read 152203 times)
sebnow
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 33


View Profile
July 18, 2012, 02:35:06 PM
 #581

What a joke. Luckily I only invested something like 3 BTC to play around with. I wouldn't be surprised if there were to be another attack...

Donations: 1LTzmaxiDxWefd2kxED3j53du7uv8hFYL7
BitcoinPyramid
Put.io is a storage service that retrieves and puts files into your personal, private online space. Try it for free.
1503142847
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1503142847

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1503142847
Reply with quote  #2

1503142847
Report to moderator
1503142847
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1503142847

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1503142847
Reply with quote  #2

1503142847
Report to moderator
1503142847
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1503142847

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1503142847
Reply with quote  #2

1503142847
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1503142847
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1503142847

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1503142847
Reply with quote  #2

1503142847
Report to moderator
1503142847
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1503142847

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1503142847
Reply with quote  #2

1503142847
Report to moderator
BCB
CTG
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008


BCJ


View Profile
July 18, 2012, 02:55:47 PM
 #582

- Tihan was fired, and no longer acting on behalf of Bitcoinica LP.

Who fired Tihan??
BCB
CTG
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008


BCJ


View Profile
July 18, 2012, 02:58:30 PM
 #583

- Tihan was fired, and no longer acting on behalf of Bitcoinica LP.

Who fired Tihan??

I'd assume the investment fund that he represented.

Don't assume.

genjix, could you elaborate??

Thx.
genjix
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232


View Profile
July 18, 2012, 03:04:22 PM
 #584

- Tihan was fired, and no longer acting on behalf of Bitcoinica LP.

Who fired Tihan??

I'd assume the investment fund that he represented.

Correct.
HorseRider
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1369


View Profile
July 18, 2012, 03:48:13 PM
 #585

It's really irresponsible. First they let the 2 hacks happen, blame each other, then all of them quit and left this chaos to the police. Left behind all the users who used to trust them.

I have invested in Bitcoinica not only because of Zhoutong, but also Intersango, which has the core developer of Bitcoin.  I have not registered on Bitcoinica until very recently of the previous hack.

This is really disappointing news. Genjix, I appreciate that you're the last person left here to deal with the users, however, it's still disapointing news.

16SvwJtQET7mkHZFFbJpgPaDA1Pxtmbm5P
tbcoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980



View Profile WWW
July 18, 2012, 03:54:16 PM
 #586

From the beginning have done everything wrong, lengthening the process and here we are. Now that beginning to reimburse, then steal you a third (=~33%) of the money earmarked to pay claims and everything stops. If stolen you a third , are still intact two-thirds. Pay the remaining =~66% now, and then do whatever you have to do.

Sorry for my bad english Wink
Bitcoin card for deposit and payment + Little POS
Donations:1N65efiNUhH6sEQg7Z6oUC76kJS9Yhevyf
guruvan
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532


View Profile
July 18, 2012, 03:56:07 PM
 #587

Well. I think I'm done. You guys go right ahead and sue these guys. It's already clear there's really not any significant money left to make payments, so I'm not sure what suing will do for us at this point.

Honestly, the only thing I will support at this point is criminal charges being brought against the individual team members. I am quite sure one or more of them would be found guilty of theft and fraud.

What I'd like to see at this point is Intersango shut down before those funds are looted from those customer accounts. I'd like to see some kind of warning tags applied so that people here know that these guys are responsible for the losses of rather large quantities of customer funds, and should not be trusted with anything.

I'd support a lawsuit that would result in the closure of Intersango in addition to the return of Bitcoinica funds, but unless we're actually going to get rid of the real problems, I don't see the point.

I also presume, that if there IS any money left in the bitcoinica coffers, that WILL be stolen before it can be repaid. I somewhat presume that any theft is really a fiction, providing show and theater for the funds that had already been lost.

I might support a lawsuit, if only to find out WTF happened at MtGox to allow that $40K USD to get transferred SO much faster than any other customer gets funds transferred.

But, nah. It's not going to have any real effect. It's certainly not going to get my money back.

Criminal charges are what we need. The money has been gone for longer than they've been claiming "theft" so I can't see any point in going after what isn't actually there. 

HorseRider
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1369


View Profile
July 18, 2012, 04:20:01 PM
 #588

when police man comes in, there will be more people can touch the money. Then there will be another "hack", I guess.

16SvwJtQET7mkHZFFbJpgPaDA1Pxtmbm5P
DarkEmi
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 223



View Profile
July 18, 2012, 04:23:57 PM
 #589

@genjix : cant you at least refund 50% to all the claim that have been marked as accurate ?

ProProfi.com
The first home improvement service cryptocurrency project
ICO | Discuss on Forum
bitclown
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 186


View Profile
July 18, 2012, 04:26:11 PM
 #590

Coins have begun passing through the payout address again. Anyone received anything today? I hope we'll get our share before it's donated to the lawyers.
rebuilder
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1618



View Profile
July 18, 2012, 04:29:05 PM
 #591

So basically, currently Bitcoinica seems orphaned. For things to go forward, whoever is in control of Bitcoinica LP needs to start acting. However, no party is willing to admit they are in control, probably because that would put them in a very nasty position, legally, and therefore nothing can happen.

Bitcoinica holds assets of course, but the liabilities are greater by far. Someone is responsible, legally, for dealing with this whole mess, but none of the candidates necessarily want to find out who that someone is, so they're not likely to spend too much time looking into it. An external probe may be the only way to get things moving again.

That said... I'm not keen on the idea of litigation around this issue. That cat may be out of the bag already, but I rather wish it weren't so. This may become the first serious legal look into the Bitcoin economy, with all its curiosities, and the case has in one way or another entangled not just Bitcoinica, but the Intersango operators and Mt. Gox as well. This could get really ugly.

Selling out to advertisers shows you respect neither yourself nor the rest of us.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Too many low-quality posts? Mods not keeping things clean enough? Self-moderated threads let you keep signature spammers and trolls out!
coinft
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 187



View Profile
July 18, 2012, 04:34:17 PM
 #592

when police man comes in, there will be more people can touch the money. Then there will be another "hack", I guess.

No. A judicial overseer would first secure all assets. That might mean immediately converting all BTC to $ and putting it into a safe bank. Since the appointed overseer can be held responsible for some losses accrued during his reign, you can bet he will play it safe.

He might incur losses due to the underlying BTC price rising, and people would cry foul even more than over open positions now, but at least there would be some assets to distribute (eventually). I am confident even lawyers can't take a bigger cut than criminals do now.
teek
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 664


ASICMINER Official Canadian Distributor


View Profile
July 18, 2012, 04:35:21 PM
 #593

@genjix : cant you at least refund 50% to all the claim that have been marked as accurate ?



Those big accounts that want to sue, I bet they sure would love their 50% back.  I know I would.     "More is lost to indecision than a bad decision."   sure seems to be ringing true here..  

lonelyminer (Peter Šurda)
Donator
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 544


View Profile
July 18, 2012, 04:42:38 PM
 #594

No. A judicial overseer would first secure all assets. That might mean immediately converting all BTC to $ and putting it into a safe bank. Since the appointed overseer can be held responsible for some losses accrued during his reign, you can bet he will play it safe.
He can (and should) rather put them into cold storage. These are deposits of Bitcoinica's customers, noone should have an authority to sell them.
coinft
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 187



View Profile
July 18, 2012, 04:46:54 PM
 #595

No. A judicial overseer would first secure all assets. That might mean immediately converting all BTC to $ and putting it into a safe bank. Since the appointed overseer can be held responsible for some losses accrued during his reign, you can bet he will play it safe.
He can (and should) rather put them into cold storage. These are deposits of Bitcoinica's customers, noone should have an authority to sell them.

Only if he understands bitcoin, which is unlikely. He has to prevent further losses foremost. He has the authority to sell off and close customers positions if that's in their best interest long term, and it is better than getting more assets stolen. I assume much of the details here depend a lot on the jurisdiction this will end in.
teek
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 664


ASICMINER Official Canadian Distributor


View Profile
July 18, 2012, 05:02:35 PM
 #596

No. A judicial overseer would first secure all assets. That might mean immediately converting all BTC to $ and putting it into a safe bank. Since the appointed overseer can be held responsible for some losses accrued during his reign, you can bet he will play it safe.
He can (and should) rather put them into cold storage. These are deposits of Bitcoinica's customers, noone should have an authority to sell them.

Only if he understands bitcoin, which is unlikely. He has to prevent further losses foremost. He has the authority to sell off and close customers positions if that's in their best interest long term, and it is better than getting more assets stolen. I assume much of the details here depend a lot on the jurisdiction this will end in.


there is almost no way that if this goes into the hands of a 3rd party with some type of official / legal obligation such as a receiver or such that any assets will remain in bitcoin unfortunately... 

rebuilder
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1618



View Profile
July 18, 2012, 05:03:34 PM
 #597

No. A judicial overseer would first secure all assets. That might mean immediately converting all BTC to $ and putting it into a safe bank. Since the appointed overseer can be held responsible for some losses accrued during his reign, you can bet he will play it safe.
He can (and should) rather put them into cold storage. These are deposits of Bitcoinica's customers, noone should have an authority to sell them.

Only if he understands bitcoin, which is unlikely. He has to prevent further losses foremost. He has the authority to sell off and close customers positions if that's in their best interest long term, and it is better than getting more assets stolen. I assume much of the details here depend a lot on the jurisdiction this will end in.

How would you seize Bitcoinica's assets, at least the BTC, without giving whoever controls the private keys the opportunity to transfer the funds to safety?

Selling out to advertisers shows you respect neither yourself nor the rest of us.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Too many low-quality posts? Mods not keeping things clean enough? Self-moderated threads let you keep signature spammers and trolls out!
imsaguy
General failure and former
VIP
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 574

Don't send me a pm unless you gpg encrypt it.


View Profile WWW
July 18, 2012, 05:42:29 PM
 #598

- Tihan was fired, and no longer acting on behalf of Bitcoinica LP.

Who fired Tihan??

I'd assume the investment fund that he represented.

Correct.

so even though Tihan is out of the picture, the investment fund is not.  Who is the new contact?

Coming Soon!™ © imsaguy 2011-2013, All rights reserved.

EIEIO:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=60117.0

Shades Minoco Collection Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=65989
Payment Address: http://btc.to/5r6
coinft
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 187



View Profile
July 18, 2012, 06:14:28 PM
 #599

No. A judicial overseer would first secure all assets. That might mean immediately converting all BTC to $ and putting it into a safe bank. Since the appointed overseer can be held responsible for some losses accrued during his reign, you can bet he will play it safe.
He can (and should) rather put them into cold storage. These are deposits of Bitcoinica's customers, noone should have an authority to sell them.

Only if he understands bitcoin, which is unlikely. He has to prevent further losses foremost. He has the authority to sell off and close customers positions if that's in their best interest long term, and it is better than getting more assets stolen. I assume much of the details here depend a lot on the jurisdiction this will end in.

How would you seize Bitcoinica's assets, at least the BTC, without giving whoever controls the private keys the opportunity to transfer the funds to safety?

Really easy. Choose a registered professional. Hold him legally responsible. Win.
defxor
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 530


View Profile
July 18, 2012, 06:32:44 PM
 #600

- Tihan was fired, and no longer acting on behalf of Bitcoinica LP.

Who fired Tihan??

I'd assume the investment fund that he represented.

Correct.

According to posts by those two persons themselves, [at least] two persons knew the LastPass password and, more crucially, that the password was insecure (i.e, not randomly generated but a known string).

One of those persons was Tihan - who selected it, the other Zhou - who knew where it came from. It will be interesting to hear, whenever that might be, where all the USD went - something MtGox seem to have information on according to Mark's posts.

(And I'm sure lots of people here would be interested in seeing the IP address from the X-Originating-IP field in the hotmail-sent "Your LastPas pasword is" mail quoted earlier by Zhou)

As to the source code release itself, which is the reason why the known string became useable for both an inside as well as an outside intrusion - the latter much more implausible, I believe the question marks as to its origin still haven't been cleared.

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 [30] 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!