ticoti (OP)
|
|
January 26, 2015, 01:53:18 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even if you use Bitcoin through Tor, the way transactions are handled by the network makes anonymity difficult to achieve. Do not expect your transactions to be anonymous unless you really know what you're doing.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
amaclin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1019
|
|
January 26, 2015, 05:21:25 PM |
|
There are "dust" outputs in it 1PayC5RCF2aXZ6Rjg2DpVM73gaQbndiZVX 0.00000261 BTC 115TJLNHbc4opemg4k22Liu4qjFjS1UpiY 0.00000783 BTC 1K35XVxqTCwHSCVxddX2MPsbTNTmV7dwbo 0.00000522 BTC Nobody wants to mine this transaction.
|
|
|
|
yakuza699
|
|
January 26, 2015, 05:27:59 PM |
|
There are "dust" outputs in it 1PayC5RCF2aXZ6Rjg2DpVM73gaQbndiZVX 0.00000261 BTC 115TJLNHbc4opemg4k22Liu4qjFjS1UpiY 0.00000783 BTC 1K35XVxqTCwHSCVxddX2MPsbTNTmV7dwbo 0.00000522 BTC Nobody wants to mine this transaction.
Last time I did a transaction with 2 outputs (one of them was 0) it got confirmed in a matter of hours though I only paid 0.0001 fee.
|
|
|
|
wunkbone
|
|
January 27, 2015, 04:05:44 AM |
|
There are "dust" outputs in it 1PayC5RCF2aXZ6Rjg2DpVM73gaQbndiZVX 0.00000261 BTC 115TJLNHbc4opemg4k22Liu4qjFjS1UpiY 0.00000783 BTC 1K35XVxqTCwHSCVxddX2MPsbTNTmV7dwbo 0.00000522 BTC Nobody wants to mine this transaction.
Last time I did a transaction with 2 outputs (one of them was 0) it got confirmed in a matter of hours though I only paid 0.0001 fee. Most miners will not confirm any transactions that contain any inputs or outputs that are under .00005800 BTC. You have three of which outputs in your transaction. It is also not possible to have an output of 0
|
|
|
|
AgentofCoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1001
|
|
January 27, 2015, 04:26:38 AM |
|
This transaction is currently being flagged as a "Double Spend".
|
I support a decentralized & unregulatable ledger first, with safe scaling over time. Request a signed message if you are associating with anyone claiming to be me.
|
|
|
|
Ingatqhvq
|
|
January 27, 2015, 04:46:00 AM |
|
There are "dust" outputs in it 1PayC5RCF2aXZ6Rjg2DpVM73gaQbndiZVX 0.00000261 BTC 115TJLNHbc4opemg4k22Liu4qjFjS1UpiY 0.00000783 BTC 1K35XVxqTCwHSCVxddX2MPsbTNTmV7dwbo 0.00000522 BTC Nobody wants to mine this transaction.
Last time I did a transaction with 2 outputs (one of them was 0) it got confirmed in a matter of hours though I only paid 0.0001 fee. Most miners will not confirm any transactions that contain any inputs or outputs that are under .00005800 BTC. You have three of which outputs in your transaction. It is also not possible to have an output of 0 So, it is impossible to sent under .00005800 BTC?
|
|
|
|
amaclin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1019
|
|
January 27, 2015, 04:50:46 AM |
|
So, it is impossible to sent under .00005800 BTC? Possible, but why do you ask? .00005800 is less than $0.02 - what are the deals for $0.02? Even my answer to your message costs me more than $0.02
|
|
|
|
jaberwock
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1073
|
|
January 27, 2015, 07:41:18 AM |
|
There are "dust" outputs in it 1PayC5RCF2aXZ6Rjg2DpVM73gaQbndiZVX 0.00000261 BTC 115TJLNHbc4opemg4k22Liu4qjFjS1UpiY 0.00000783 BTC 1K35XVxqTCwHSCVxddX2MPsbTNTmV7dwbo 0.00000522 BTC Nobody wants to mine this transaction.
Last time I did a transaction with 2 outputs (one of them was 0) it got confirmed in a matter of hours though I only paid 0.0001 fee. Most miners will not confirm any transactions that contain any inputs or outputs that are under .00005800 BTC. You have three of which outputs in your transaction. It is also not possible to have an output of 0 So, it is impossible to sent under .00005800 BTC? yes it is, but not when you are double spending, like whoever made this transaction did
|
|
|
|
el kaka22
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3514
Merit: 1162
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
|
|
January 27, 2015, 08:23:16 AM |
|
waw , 0.01 fee that big amount just for fee i think but if i seen value of the transaction it is reasonable its sucks if had longtime confirmation with big transaction
|
|
|
|
Ingatqhvq
|
|
January 27, 2015, 10:12:50 AM |
|
So, it is impossible to sent under .00005800 BTC? Possible, but why do you ask? .00005800 is less than $0.02 - what are the deals for $0.02? Even my answer to your message costs me more than $0.02 ATM, .00005800 BTC is less than $0.02, But if the price of bitcoin is more than $10000, then .00005800 BTC is about $0.58,
|
|
|
|
yakuza699
|
|
January 27, 2015, 02:23:20 PM |
|
There are "dust" outputs in it 1PayC5RCF2aXZ6Rjg2DpVM73gaQbndiZVX 0.00000261 BTC 115TJLNHbc4opemg4k22Liu4qjFjS1UpiY 0.00000783 BTC 1K35XVxqTCwHSCVxddX2MPsbTNTmV7dwbo 0.00000522 BTC Nobody wants to mine this transaction.
Last time I did a transaction with 2 outputs (one of them was 0) it got confirmed in a matter of hours though I only paid 0.0001 fee. Most miners will not confirm any transactions that contain any inputs or outputs that are under .00005800 BTC. You have three of which outputs in your transaction. It is also not possible to have an output of 0 Wanna bet that I can make a transaction that has an output of 0 and pays 0 fee and can even make it confirm? I am ready to bet up to 0.2?
|
|
|
|
sandykho47
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 252
Merit: 251
Knowledge its everything
|
|
January 27, 2015, 02:29:10 PM |
|
Double spending & contain too small outputs It's better to rebroadcast transaction after it deleted from blockchain.info
But, i remember some times ago there are some transaction with 1 satoshi output
|
Kemampuanku Tidak semua orang memiliki dan dapat melakukannya . Tidak memakan kaum sendiri . dan mempunyai kode etik yang tidak masuk akal.
|
|
|
unsoindovo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1042
https://locktrip.com/?refId=40964
|
|
January 27, 2015, 04:06:37 PM |
|
Double spending & contain too small outputs It's better to rebroadcast transaction after it deleted from blockchain.info
But, i remember some times ago there are some transaction with 1 satoshi output
the problem here, is the double spending warning. i think dust transaction it is ok with 0.01fee... You cannot cancel an unconfirmed transaction. When a transaction has been transmitted to the chain so wait until it is cancel for timeout. redo transaction without the double spending problem..
|
|
|
|
ujka
|
|
January 27, 2015, 04:53:01 PM |
|
There are "dust" outputs in it 1PayC5RCF2aXZ6Rjg2DpVM73gaQbndiZVX 0.00000261 BTC 115TJLNHbc4opemg4k22Liu4qjFjS1UpiY 0.00000783 BTC 1K35XVxqTCwHSCVxddX2MPsbTNTmV7dwbo 0.00000522 BTC Nobody wants to mine this transaction.
Last time I did a transaction with 2 outputs (one of them was 0) it got confirmed in a matter of hours though I only paid 0.0001 fee. Most miners will not confirm any transactions that contain any inputs or outputs that are under .00005800 BTC. You have three of which outputs in your transaction. It is also not possible to have an output of 0 So, it is impossible to sent under .00005800 BTC? yes it is, but not when you are double spending, like whoever made this transaction did OP here decided that confirmation is taking too long, even with 0.01 fee, so he sent another tx using same input (double spend) instead of waiting for confirmation.
|
|
|
|
unsoindovo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1042
https://locktrip.com/?refId=40964
|
|
January 27, 2015, 05:11:27 PM |
|
There are "dust" outputs in it 1PayC5RCF2aXZ6Rjg2DpVM73gaQbndiZVX 0.00000261 BTC 115TJLNHbc4opemg4k22Liu4qjFjS1UpiY 0.00000783 BTC 1K35XVxqTCwHSCVxddX2MPsbTNTmV7dwbo 0.00000522 BTC Nobody wants to mine this transaction.
Last time I did a transaction with 2 outputs (one of them was 0) it got confirmed in a matter of hours though I only paid 0.0001 fee. Most miners will not confirm any transactions that contain any inputs or outputs that are under .00005800 BTC. You have three of which outputs in your transaction. It is also not possible to have an output of 0 So, it is impossible to sent under .00005800 BTC? yes it is, but not when you are double spending, like whoever made this transaction did OP here decided that confirmation is taking too long, even with 0.01 fee, so he sent another tx using same input (double spend) instead of waiting for confirmation. i think this solution give him same result why this new transaction with same problem would be accepted? maybe there are some new consideration?
|
|
|
|
gaby1988
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
January 27, 2015, 05:14:29 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
ujka
|
|
January 27, 2015, 05:20:32 PM |
|
OP here decided that confirmation is taking too long, even with 0.01 fee, so he sent another tx using same input (double spend) instead of waiting for confirmation.
i think this solution give him same result why this new transaction with same problem would be accepted? maybe there are some new consideration? No, there is no 'new transaction with same problem'. OP did not repeat the same tx. He used same input and sent it to himself, in hope that new tx will confirm before. It did.
|
|
|
|
unsoindovo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1042
https://locktrip.com/?refId=40964
|
|
January 27, 2015, 05:25:18 PM |
|
OP here decided that confirmation is taking too long, even with 0.01 fee, so he sent another tx using same input (double spend) instead of waiting for confirmation.
i think this solution give him same result why this new transaction with same problem would be accepted? maybe there are some new consideration? No, there is no 'new transaction with same problem'. OP did not repeat the same tx. He used same input and sent it to himself, in hope that new tx will confirm before. It did. oh sure.... i understand!!! i haven't seen this part "He used same input and sent it to himself" let's see if the transaction will be confirmed!!!
|
|
|
|
pooya87
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3444
Merit: 10536
|
|
January 27, 2015, 06:42:35 PM |
|
i think the first couldn't be included in a block or get confirmed because of the transaction's size
|
. .BLACKJACK ♠ FUN. | | | ███▄██████ ██████████████▀ ████████████ █████████████████ ████████████████▄▄ ░█████████████▀░▀▀ ██████████████████ ░██████████████ █████████████████▄ ░██████████████▀ ████████████ ███████████████░██ ██████████ | | CRYPTO CASINO & SPORTS BETTING | | │ | | │ | ▄▄███████▄▄ ▄███████████████▄ ███████████████████ █████████████████████ ███████████████████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ ███████████████████████ █████████████████████ ███████████████████ ▀███████████████▀ ███████████████████ | | .
|
|
|
|
|