1DkyBEKt5S2GDtv7aQw6rQepAvnsRyHoYM

[Jutarul]

Anyway we reached the trust floor ($8-$9). It's shopping time!

[1713946010]

1713946010

[1713946010]

1713946010

[1713946010]

1713946010

[1713946010]

1713946010

[1713946010]

1713946010

[1713946010]

1713946010

[runeks]

Is there a way to find out if it was change indeed?

It was not.

https://i.imgur.com/ABseC.png

How did you get that view? I can't find that on here.

Still. He has ten 10,000 BTC inputs. Why was it necessary to add the two small sub-0.01 BTC inputs and send the sum of that to a separate address?

Could it be Mt. Gox activity?

Does the QT GUI Satoshi client do sendmany transactions by default?

[mb300sd]

Is there a way to find out if it was change indeed?

It was not.

https://i.imgur.com/ABseC.png

How did you get that view? I can't find that on here.

Still. He has ten 10,000 BTC inputs. Why was it necessary to add the two small sub-0.01 BTC inputs and send the sum of that to a separate address?

Could it be Mt. Gox activity?

Does the QT GUI Satoshi client do sendmany transactions by default?

At the very bottom:

Advanced: Enable

[Spekulatius]

Whats the purpose of senndmany txs in contrast to send the whole lot in just one tx?

[Raoul Duke]

Is there a way to find out if it was change indeed?

It was not.

https://i.imgur.com/ABseC.png

How did you get that view? I can't find that on here.

Disable the advanced view at the bottom of the page

Still. He has ten 10,000 BTC inputs. Why was it necessary to add the two small sub-0.01 BTC inputs and send the sum of that to a separate address?

Could it be Mt. Gox activity?

Does the QT GUI Satoshi client do sendmany transactions by default?

Yes it does support sending them from the GUI

[runeks]

^ Good to know.

Whats the purpose of senndmany txs in contrast to send the whole lot in just one tx?

As far as I know, sendmany TXs allows an arbitrary number of receiving addresses (outputs) while "normal" transactions only include a single output address plus the change address (if any).

So you save space in the block chain - and, possibly, fees - if you want to send coins to multiple addresses.

EDIT: Anyone watching the action on Mt. Gox? BTCUSD is plummeting!!

[Jutarul]

^ Good to know.

Whats the purpose of senndmany txs in contrast to send the whole lot in just one tx?

As far as I know, sendmany TXs allows an arbitrary number of receiving addresses (outputs) while "normal" transactions only include a single output address plus the change address (if any).

So you save space in the block chain - and, possibly, fees - if you want to send coins to multiple addresses.

EDIT: Anyone watching the action on Mt. Gox? BTCUSD is plummeting!!

Yes. Through the floor! Somebody is going to buy back at a loss!

[MrGaSp]

^ Good to know.

Whats the purpose of senndmany txs in contrast to send the whole lot in just one tx?

As far as I know, sendmany TXs allows an arbitrary number of receiving addresses (outputs) while "normal" transactions only include a single output address plus the change address (if any).

So you save space in the block chain - and, possibly, fees - if you want to send coins to multiple addresses.

EDIT: Anyone watching the action on Mt. Gox? BTCUSD is plummeting!!

I am completely glued to this: http://bitcoin.clarkmoody.com/

[Spekulatius]

^ Good to know.

Whats the purpose of senndmany txs in contrast to send the whole lot in just one tx?

As far as I know, sendmany TXs allows an arbitrary number of receiving addresses (outputs) while "normal" transactions only include a single output address plus the change address (if any).

So you save space in the block chain - and, possibly, fees - if you want to send coins to multiple addresses.

EDIT: Anyone watching the action on Mt. Gox? BTCUSD is plummeting!!

Ok, but if he sent everything to one single output address anyway then why did he do it?

[Spekulatius]

Uh oh, 100k BTC set in motion  

This is gonna be a long night

https://blockchain.info/address/1E9k79dLuhfspdEtymzP7vhaYVGFcdfsYs

[Ziyonex]

Uh oh, 100k BTC set in motion  

This is gonna be a long night

https://blockchain.info/address/1E9k79dLuhfspdEtymzP7vhaYVGFcdfsYs

Nuoooomy god.

[Jutarul]

Let's see how long he's playing the masses  

[runeks]

^ Good to know.

Whats the purpose of senndmany txs in contrast to send the whole lot in just one tx?

As far as I know, sendmany TXs allows an arbitrary number of receiving addresses (outputs) while "normal" transactions only include a single output address plus the change address (if any).

So you save space in the block chain - and, possibly, fees - if you want to send coins to multiple addresses.

EDIT: Anyone watching the action on Mt. Gox? BTCUSD is plummeting!!

Ok, but if he sent everything to one single output address anyway then why did he do it?

He sent it to two addresses. One that received the 100,000 and another that received around 0.01 BTC. Why he did that only he knows, I guess. The second address that received the small amount wasn't a change address, because he had outputs sufficient to not send back change. It was a purposeful sendmany tx of 100,000 BTC plus ~0.01 BTC. This is why I speculated it might be Mt. Gox.

[Spekulatius]

^ Good to know.

Whats the purpose of senndmany txs in contrast to send the whole lot in just one tx?

As far as I know, sendmany TXs allows an arbitrary number of receiving addresses (outputs) while "normal" transactions only include a single output address plus the change address (if any).

So you save space in the block chain - and, possibly, fees - if you want to send coins to multiple addresses.

EDIT: Anyone watching the action on Mt. Gox? BTCUSD is plummeting!!

Ok, but if he sent everything to one single output address anyway then why did he do it?

He sent it to two addresses. One that received the 100,000 and another that received around 0.01 BTC. Why he did that only he knows, I guess. The second address that received the small amount wasn't a change address, because he had outputs sufficient to not send back change. It was a purposeful sendmany tx of 100,000 BTC plus ~0.01 BTC. This is why I speculated it might be Mt. Gox.

Does the latest move (sending 20k BTC and 80k BTC from there) still fit in with your assumption?

[elux]

Uh oh, 100k BTC set in motion  
This is gonna be a long night

Ladies and gentlemen, we have just lost cabin pressure.

Remain calm, although the bag does not inflate, oxygen still flows through the mask.

Please brace yourselves in the emergency landing position, noting the emergency exits nearest your seat.

[Rygon]

Uh oh, 100k BTC set in motion  

This is gonna be a long night

https://blockchain.info/address/1E9k79dLuhfspdEtymzP7vhaYVGFcdfsYs

Uh oh. That information should be enough to cause anyone with buy orders to rethink their price. (FUD spread!)

[Spekulatius]

Uh oh, 100k BTC set in motion  
This is gonna be a long night

Cabincall on Hindencoin before landing:

Ladies and gentlemen, we have just lost cabin pressure.

Remain calm, although the bag does not inflate, oxygen still flows through the mask.

Please brace yourselves in the emergency landing position, noting the emergency exits nearest your seat.

[runeks]

Does the latest move (sending 20k BTC and 80k BTC from there) still fit in with your assumption?

It certainly doesn't prove that it isn't Mt. Gox' address. But yeah... I wouldn't expect Mt. Gox to be moving a lot of BTC right now. I wouldn't think a plummeting price would trigger BTC withdrawals.

[Ziyonex]

https://blockchain.info/address/1E9k79dLuhfspdEtymzP7vhaYVGFcdfsYs
Follow that 20k.

What is the point of this? As of now, there are 18 different confirmed addresses the 20k transfers to, making small (relatively) deposits on the way. What is going on?

[Spekulatius]

Does the latest move (sending 20k BTC and 80k BTC from there) still fit in with your assumption?

It certainly doesn't prove that it isn't Mt. Gox' address. But yeah... I wouldn't expect Mt. Gox to be moving a lot of BTC right now. I wouldn't think a plummeting price would trigger BTC withdrawals.

He himself couldnt possibly send more then 20k BTC a day to other accounts/addresses (see mtgox withraw limits). Its either MtGox' backend or the funds have not reached Gox yet.