Bitcoin Forum
December 09, 2016, 01:38:56 PM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 »
  Print  
Author Topic: 1DkyBEKt5S2GDtv7aQw6rQepAvnsRyHoYM  (Read 79231 times)
Raoul Duke
aka psy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442



View Profile
August 19, 2012, 05:58:46 PM
 #221

Is there a way to find out if it was change indeed?

It was not.

http://i.imgur.com/ABseC.png

A sendmany transaction lol

1481290736
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481290736

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481290736
Reply with quote  #2

1481290736
Report to moderator
1481290736
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481290736

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481290736
Reply with quote  #2

1481290736
Report to moderator
1481290736
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481290736

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481290736
Reply with quote  #2

1481290736
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
Jutarul
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 994



View Profile
August 19, 2012, 05:59:20 PM
 #222

Anyway we reached the trust floor ($8-$9). It's shopping time!

The ASICMINER Project https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=99497.0
"The way you solve things is by making it politically profitable for the wrong people to do the right thing.", Milton Friedman
runeks
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924



View Profile WWW
August 19, 2012, 06:03:29 PM
 #223

Is there a way to find out if it was change indeed?

It was not.

http://i.imgur.com/ABseC.png
How did you get that view? I can't find that on here.

Still. He has ten 10,000 BTC inputs. Why was it necessary to add the two small sub-0.01 BTC inputs and send the sum of that to a separate address?

Could it be Mt. Gox activity?

Does the QT GUI Satoshi client do sendmany transactions by default?
mb300sd
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232

Drunk Posts


View Profile WWW
August 19, 2012, 06:08:14 PM
 #224

Is there a way to find out if it was change indeed?

It was not.

http://i.imgur.com/ABseC.png
How did you get that view? I can't find that on here.

Still. He has ten 10,000 BTC inputs. Why was it necessary to add the two small sub-0.01 BTC inputs and send the sum of that to a separate address?

Could it be Mt. Gox activity?

Does the QT GUI Satoshi client do sendmany transactions by default?

At the very bottom:

Advanced: Enable

1D7FJWRzeKa4SLmTznd3JpeNU13L1ErEco
Spekulatius
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022



View Profile
August 19, 2012, 06:20:03 PM
 #225

Whats the purpose of senndmany txs in contrast to send the whole lot in just one tx?
Raoul Duke
aka psy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442



View Profile
August 19, 2012, 06:27:01 PM
 #226

Is there a way to find out if it was change indeed?

It was not.

http://i.imgur.com/ABseC.png
How did you get that view? I can't find that on here.

Disable the advanced view at the bottom of the page

Still. He has ten 10,000 BTC inputs. Why was it necessary to add the two small sub-0.01 BTC inputs and send the sum of that to a separate address?

Could it be Mt. Gox activity?

Does the QT GUI Satoshi client do sendmany transactions by default?

Yes it does support sending them from the GUI


runeks
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924



View Profile WWW
August 19, 2012, 06:30:36 PM
 #227

^ Good to know.

Whats the purpose of senndmany txs in contrast to send the whole lot in just one tx?
As far as I know, sendmany TXs allows an arbitrary number of receiving addresses (outputs) while "normal" transactions only include a single output address plus the change address (if any).

So you save space in the block chain - and, possibly, fees - if you want to send coins to multiple addresses.

EDIT: Anyone watching the action on Mt. Gox? BTCUSD is plummeting!!
Jutarul
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 994



View Profile
August 19, 2012, 06:42:47 PM
 #228

^ Good to know.

Whats the purpose of senndmany txs in contrast to send the whole lot in just one tx?
As far as I know, sendmany TXs allows an arbitrary number of receiving addresses (outputs) while "normal" transactions only include a single output address plus the change address (if any).

So you save space in the block chain - and, possibly, fees - if you want to send coins to multiple addresses.

EDIT: Anyone watching the action on Mt. Gox? BTCUSD is plummeting!!

Yes. Through the floor! Somebody is going to buy back at a loss!

The ASICMINER Project https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=99497.0
"The way you solve things is by making it politically profitable for the wrong people to do the right thing.", Milton Friedman
MrGaSp
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 299


View Profile
August 19, 2012, 06:43:24 PM
 #229

^ Good to know.

Whats the purpose of senndmany txs in contrast to send the whole lot in just one tx?
As far as I know, sendmany TXs allows an arbitrary number of receiving addresses (outputs) while "normal" transactions only include a single output address plus the change address (if any).

So you save space in the block chain - and, possibly, fees - if you want to send coins to multiple addresses.

EDIT: Anyone watching the action on Mt. Gox? BTCUSD is plummeting!!

I am completely glued to this: http://bitcoin.clarkmoody.com/

Spekulatius
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022



View Profile
August 19, 2012, 06:48:43 PM
 #230

^ Good to know.

Whats the purpose of senndmany txs in contrast to send the whole lot in just one tx?
As far as I know, sendmany TXs allows an arbitrary number of receiving addresses (outputs) while "normal" transactions only include a single output address plus the change address (if any).

So you save space in the block chain - and, possibly, fees - if you want to send coins to multiple addresses.

EDIT: Anyone watching the action on Mt. Gox? BTCUSD is plummeting!!

Ok, but if he sent everything to one single output address anyway then why did he do it?
Spekulatius
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022



View Profile
August 19, 2012, 06:50:32 PM
 #231

Uh oh, 100k BTC set in motion  Grin

This is gonna be a long night Wink

https://blockchain.info/address/1E9k79dLuhfspdEtymzP7vhaYVGFcdfsYs
Ziyonex
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 16


View Profile
August 19, 2012, 06:55:03 PM
 #232

Uh oh, 100k BTC set in motion  Grin

This is gonna be a long night Wink

https://blockchain.info/address/1E9k79dLuhfspdEtymzP7vhaYVGFcdfsYs

Nuoooomy god.
Jutarul
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 994



View Profile
August 19, 2012, 06:55:16 PM
 #233

Let's see how long he's playing the masses  Grin

The ASICMINER Project https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=99497.0
"The way you solve things is by making it politically profitable for the wrong people to do the right thing.", Milton Friedman
runeks
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924



View Profile WWW
August 19, 2012, 06:59:04 PM
 #234

^ Good to know.

Whats the purpose of senndmany txs in contrast to send the whole lot in just one tx?
As far as I know, sendmany TXs allows an arbitrary number of receiving addresses (outputs) while "normal" transactions only include a single output address plus the change address (if any).

So you save space in the block chain - and, possibly, fees - if you want to send coins to multiple addresses.

EDIT: Anyone watching the action on Mt. Gox? BTCUSD is plummeting!!

Ok, but if he sent everything to one single output address anyway then why did he do it?
He sent it to two addresses. One that received the 100,000 and another that received around 0.01 BTC. Why he did that only he knows, I guess. The second address that received the small amount wasn't a change address, because he had outputs sufficient to not send back change. It was a purposeful sendmany tx of 100,000 BTC plus ~0.01 BTC. This is why I speculated it might be Mt. Gox.
Spekulatius
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022



View Profile
August 19, 2012, 07:08:06 PM
 #235

^ Good to know.

Whats the purpose of senndmany txs in contrast to send the whole lot in just one tx?
As far as I know, sendmany TXs allows an arbitrary number of receiving addresses (outputs) while "normal" transactions only include a single output address plus the change address (if any).

So you save space in the block chain - and, possibly, fees - if you want to send coins to multiple addresses.

EDIT: Anyone watching the action on Mt. Gox? BTCUSD is plummeting!!

Ok, but if he sent everything to one single output address anyway then why did he do it?
He sent it to two addresses. One that received the 100,000 and another that received around 0.01 BTC. Why he did that only he knows, I guess. The second address that received the small amount wasn't a change address, because he had outputs sufficient to not send back change. It was a purposeful sendmany tx of 100,000 BTC plus ~0.01 BTC. This is why I speculated it might be Mt. Gox.

Does the latest move (sending 20k BTC and 80k BTC from there) still fit in with your assumption?
elux
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1454



View Profile
August 19, 2012, 07:11:57 PM
 #236

Uh oh, 100k BTC set in motion  Grin
This is gonna be a long night Wink

Quote from: Fight Club
Ladies and gentlemen, we have just lost cabin pressure.

Remain calm, although the bag does not inflate, oxygen still flows through the mask.

Please brace yourselves in the emergency landing position, noting the emergency exits nearest your seat.
Rygon
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 519


View Profile
August 19, 2012, 07:17:05 PM
 #237

Uh oh, 100k BTC set in motion  Grin

This is gonna be a long night Wink

https://blockchain.info/address/1E9k79dLuhfspdEtymzP7vhaYVGFcdfsYs

Uh oh. That information should be enough to cause anyone with buy orders to rethink their price. (FUD spread!)
Spekulatius
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022



View Profile
August 19, 2012, 07:23:51 PM
 #238

Uh oh, 100k BTC set in motion  Grin
This is gonna be a long night Wink

Cabincall on Hindencoin before landing:

Quote from: Fight Club
Ladies and gentlemen, we have just lost cabin pressure.

Remain calm, although the bag does not inflate, oxygen still flows through the mask.

Please brace yourselves in the emergency landing position, noting the emergency exits nearest your seat.

runeks
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924



View Profile WWW
August 19, 2012, 07:29:44 PM
 #239

Does the latest move (sending 20k BTC and 80k BTC from there) still fit in with your assumption?
It certainly doesn't prove that it isn't Mt. Gox' address. But yeah... I wouldn't expect Mt. Gox to be moving a lot of BTC right now. I wouldn't think a plummeting price would trigger BTC withdrawals.
Ziyonex
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 16


View Profile
August 19, 2012, 07:35:16 PM
 #240

https://blockchain.info/address/1E9k79dLuhfspdEtymzP7vhaYVGFcdfsYs
Follow that 20k.

What is the point of this? As of now, there are 18 different confirmed addresses the 20k transfers to, making small (relatively) deposits on the way. What is going on?
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!