Bitcoin Forum
December 05, 2016, 04:36:30 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 [32] 33 34 »
  Print  
Author Topic: 1DkyBEKt5S2GDtv7aQw6rQepAvnsRyHoYM  (Read 79171 times)
dropt
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442



View Profile
September 25, 2012, 08:25:21 AM
 #621

I didn't bother to speculate on your motives, that wasn't behind my accusation. It was that the 14 BTC stayed at that address just one hop away seemed too coincidental. My deposits hadn't worked that way, so I was highly skeptical. I had assumed their tumbler would've operated more consistently and thoroughly, but I was wrong.

Thank you for the proof. It definitely cost me (should've only bet 10!), but at least I'm glad to have satisfied, to my own personal standards, who controls 1DKy.

I know, my response was pretty much a knee-jerk reaction to your posts.  Since you're still on the hunt, I should add that all of those withdrawals from 13aZs are lump sums when the coins were not 'distributed' in that fashion on my end.  Seems as though it holds them in the depositing address until the lump some is spent or swept at pre-determined intervals
1480912590
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480912590

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480912590
Reply with quote  #2

1480912590
Report to moderator
1480912590
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480912590

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480912590
Reply with quote  #2

1480912590
Report to moderator
1480912590
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480912590

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480912590
Reply with quote  #2

1480912590
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
Frankie
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 206



View Profile
September 27, 2012, 01:46:28 AM
 #622

1)  this is the god damn pirate wallet, 90%+ confidence.

2)  built this year, starting right when his scam was ramping up

3) died when the scam died

4)  rule out Gox / Silk Road, and it's only Pirate left:
4a)   SR does 22M in business per year, profits about 1M, and is likely quickly converted to USD
4b)  Gox isn't that stupid, wouldn't build a 500kBTC wallet (that's 5% of ALL btc) and this is not how a Gox cold storage wallet would look (why is it built in weekly / monthly regular headshots? only during this yr?  ending with a super-launder?)

It's Trendon   

Re. 4a) This doesn't need to be SR's profits.  It's just the BTC they're currently holding.  Customers deposit BTC at SR then trade them with sellers.  While the BTC are on the site, they need to keep them safe.  Hence the use of this offline wallet.  Since the address became public knowledge they've split the contents up into several smaller addresses to avoid scrutiny.

Re. the other points, that's useless circumstantial evidence and doesn't prove anything.

It's SR.

Evidence is compelling.

Besides, if Pirate kept his booty in bitcoin, he likely wouldn't have more than 100,000ish; most of his deposits were imaginary.
nimda
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784


0xFB0D8D1534241423


View Profile
September 27, 2012, 01:48:55 AM
 #623

1)  this is the god damn pirate wallet, 90%+ confidence.

2)  built this year, starting right when his scam was ramping up

3) died when the scam died

4)  rule out Gox / Silk Road, and it's only Pirate left:
4a)   SR does 22M in business per year, profits about 1M, and is likely quickly converted to USD
4b)  Gox isn't that stupid, wouldn't build a 500kBTC wallet (that's 5% of ALL btc) and this is not how a Gox cold storage wallet would look (why is it built in weekly / monthly regular headshots? only during this yr?  ending with a super-launder?)

It's Trendon   

Re. 4a) This doesn't need to be SR's profits.  It's just the BTC they're currently holding.  Customers deposit BTC at SR then trade them with sellers.  While the BTC are on the site, they need to keep them safe.  Hence the use of this offline wallet.  Since the address became public knowledge they've split the contents up into several smaller addresses to avoid scrutiny.

Re. the other points, that's useless circumstantial evidence and doesn't prove anything.

It's SR.

Evidence is compelling.

Besides, if Pirate kept his booty in bitcoin, he likely wouldn't have more than 100,000ish; most of his deposits were imaginary.
Are we STILL talking about this? SR deposit -> 1-hop to the 1Dky wallet. End of story.

I recommend asking me for a signature from my GPG key before doing a trade. I will NEVER deny such a request.
bitcoinBull
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 826


rippleFanatic


View Profile
September 27, 2012, 07:45:44 PM
 #624

It's a damn shame you didn't do so before SR stopped using 1Dky. I am a happy man, because I know for a fact that I wasn't lying to myself, and it would be pretty hard for dooglus to lie to me because the payments are embedded in the blockchain for all eternity.

I only accused dropt of lying, not you or dooglus. The reason I found those analyses lacking is because the experiments only attempted to trace SR coin deposits to 1DKy, without attempting to do the same with MtGox deposits or withdrawals. Testing this alternative hypothesis was necessary, since many of the addresses which feed into 1DKy are within mtgox's closure. So, of my two MtGox withdrawals, one traced back to some coins generated not long ago, and the other was from MtGox's 1LNW "green address". Whereas my SR withdrawal came from 1DKy.

It was the side-by-side comparison which I hadn't seen done, and I was little irritated by that. I was wrong about dropt, so I sent him 25 BTC (he sent me back 12.5. he's a decent dude).

College of Bucking Bulls Knowledge
thallium205
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42


View Profile WWW
January 06, 2013, 03:25:15 AM
 #625

Have you guys considered using this brand new tool to help you track this address down?  http://blockviewer.com/#1DkyBEKt5S2GDtv7aQw6rQepAvnsRyHoYM
Kazu
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168


View Profile
July 04, 2013, 06:09:44 PM
 #626

So can somebody possibly explain http://1dkybekt5s2gdtv7aqw6rqepavnsryhoym.com/?

CoinLenders - Bitcoin Bank Script / Demo
1v.io/kazu - 15ccW7m6RxDFWEKc3P1NdwWpX1N1pU7gZ8
Raize
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1374


View Profile
July 04, 2013, 08:04:32 PM
 #627

I think Matt registered it as a fun way to point out and poke fun at the person that had a ton of coin. Must have lost the domain or hosting on it, though.

OrganofCorti's Neighbourhood Pool Watch - The most informative website on blockchain health
Hyena
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470



View Profile WWW
July 04, 2013, 08:11:25 PM
 #628

a necromancer! stop raising undead threads!

Jaroslaw
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84


supernode


View Profile
July 05, 2013, 08:41:26 AM
 #629

I might know whos owner of this adress Smiley
wopwop
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252



View Profile
July 05, 2013, 09:35:55 AM
 #630

I might know whos owner of this adress Smiley
Me too
Chronikka
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658



View Profile
October 07, 2013, 05:03:11 PM
 #631

Lets hope the owner we are all speculating about has given his private key to somebody...otherwise 600k BTC are off the market and all we can do is stare at it.

"The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination"  -Albert Einstein
Gyrsur
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498


#BEL+++++


View Profile WWW
October 07, 2013, 05:17:15 PM
 #632

maybe a brainwallet?

EDIT: BTW final balance is 0.19106797 BTC (https://blockchain.info/address/1DkyBEKt5S2GDtv7aQw6rQepAvnsRyHoYM)

lucas.sev
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252



View Profile
October 07, 2013, 05:20:46 PM
 #633

why nobody wants to say it's DPR?
Raoul Duke
aka psy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442



View Profile
October 07, 2013, 05:56:25 PM
 #634

why nobody wants to say it's DPR?

Because nobody knows?

Tirapon
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812



View Profile
October 07, 2013, 10:49:08 PM
 #635

whats with all the 0.000055 BTC transactions?
Chronikka
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658



View Profile
October 07, 2013, 11:29:49 PM
 #636

whats with all the 0.000055 BTC transactions?

I believe they are network transaction fees that were being collected but somebody correct me if I am wrong

"The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination"  -Albert Einstein
bitcoinBull
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 826


rippleFanatic


View Profile
October 08, 2013, 04:20:27 PM
 #637

A neco thread was resurrected because it had a post by altoid. So I noticed a BTC address posted by altoid in some php bitcoind code: 1LDNLreKJ6GawBHPgB5yfVLBERi8g3SbQS.

I followed that address to another one, 1933phfhK3ZgFQNLGSDXvqCn32k2buXY8a, currently sitting with 111,111 BTC in it.

College of Bucking Bulls Knowledge
Chronikka
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658



View Profile
October 08, 2013, 04:25:37 PM
 #638

A neco thread was resurrected because it had a post by altoid. So I noticed a BTC address posted by altoid in some php bitcoind code: 1LDNLreKJ6GawBHPgB5yfVLBERi8g3SbQS.

I followed that address to another one, 1933phfhK3ZgFQNLGSDXvqCn32k2buXY8a, currently sitting with 111,111 BTC in it.


Yes I came to that one as well. The number makes sense and so does the time stamp on the first transaction (Summer 2011). People saying he had 600k aren't considering running costs and personal expenses. 111k is much more reasonable and still a considerable hoarde

"The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination"  -Albert Einstein
Chronikka
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658



View Profile
October 08, 2013, 04:47:18 PM
 #639

A neco thread was resurrected because it had a post by altoid. So I noticed a BTC address posted by altoid in some php bitcoind code: 1LDNLreKJ6GawBHPgB5yfVLBERi8g3SbQS.

I followed that address to another one, 1933phfhK3ZgFQNLGSDXvqCn32k2buXY8a, currently sitting with 111,111 BTC in it.


Yes I came to that one as well. The number makes sense and so does the time stamp on the first transaction (Summer 2011). People saying he had 600k aren't considering running costs and personal expenses. 111k is much more reasonable and still a considerable hoarde

But that one stops getting real deposits Nov 15th, 2012.

There is more out there I would say 250-400k coins.

True. But the initial transfer was for 40k BTC. You don't just drop 40k BTC in a wallet even back in 2011 unless its intended for long term storage or you intend to spend it (Which he didn't). I think this was intended as long term cold storage and as bitcoin increased in value so did this wallet's value

"The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination"  -Albert Einstein
ErebusBat
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560

I am the one who knocks


View Profile
October 10, 2013, 09:55:07 PM
 #640

True. But the initial transfer was for 40k BTC. You don't just drop 40k BTC in a wallet even back in 2011 unless its intended for long term storage or you intend to spend it (Which he didn't). I think this was intended as long term cold storage and as bitcoin increased in value so did this wallet's value
Cold Storage is a very good point.

We also don't know that this is the ONLY wallet, or if he had other investments in BTC (who knows how much he lost in the GLBSE madness) or to (the other) pirate  Roll Eyes.

░▒▓█ Coinroll.it - 1% House Edge Dice Game █▓▒░ • Coinroll Thread • *FREE* 100 BTC Raffle

Signup for CEX.io BitFury exchange and get GHS Instantly!  Don't wait for shipping, mine NOW!
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 [32] 33 34 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!