[ANN] [SUP] Supcoin, PLUCK algorithm, Just Launched, Mine Now!

[NightShade00013]

Still a vast majority mining on one pool.  If the developer is launching another coin in the coming months they need to find a way to manually or automatically limit what any one given pool or node can process at any time to less than 48% of all hashing power.  There should be some way for the network to penalize them with a much higher difficulty than normal, this would either force the people to spread the hash or accept a reduced rate of finding for that node which would in turn encourage them to spread the hash rate and stabilize the coin base.

A miner with a high hashrate would be able to just spread out the mining onto multiple addresses.

But that would still help to prevent one pool from having a majority, a pool works under one address pooling their resources together and payment is made out later on.  A single person would need to have multiple wallets if they were self mining which would make it more difficult to exploit the coin.  The system would balance out as no one person would want to have a majority of hashing power, pool operators would try and self limit and single miners would not want to be over a majority as they would incur something that would prevent them from exploiting the system which would be much harder to do with multiple addresses.

I'm not proposing a reduction in hashing power just a way to help insure that it is spread between more than one pool or person.  IMHO the more hashing power the better especially later on as it will only increase the value but having it all at one place only hurts.

[1714973754]

1714973754

[1714973754]

1714973754

[e1ghtSpace]

The price is too high. Imma wait till it drops down again. Currently the marketcap is ~27 btc.

[e1ghtSpace]

how many coins currently mined

~3620

[Vorksholk]

For anyone curious, the NVidia K520 (Cuda ver. 3.0) is getting around 0.77 kH/s in ccminer with a throughput of 5 with the 3.0 patches provided by djm34 earlier. However, it seems to be submitting less shares (less 'accepted') than when it runs at a throughput of 2.5, even though 2.5 reports a hash rate of 0.63.  

For reference, one card from a K520 (the K520 has two individual GPUs, each of which is generally attached to a separate vm) has 1536 shaders on the GK104 architecture at a clock of 800MHz, so it's basically a 680 with 4GB of VRAM and lower shader clocks.

[e1ghtSpace]

However, it seems to be submitting less shares (less 'accepted')

Are you saying that there are more unaccepted shares? Because if not, that's probably because of a higher difficulty.

[Vorksholk]

However, it seems to be submitting less shares (less 'accepted')

Are you saying that there are more unaccepted shares? Because if not, that's probably because of a higher difficulty.

Nope, both are at a 100% acceptance rate (after about 10 minutes of running). I'm wondering if the hashrate is being reported incorrectly, or maybe pool difficulty is just playing tricks.

[MickGhee]

BOSS!!!

[e1ghtSpace]

However, it seems to be submitting less shares (less 'accepted')

Are you saying that there are more unaccepted shares? Because if not, that's probably because of a higher difficulty.

Nope, both are at a 100% acceptance rate (after about 10 minutes of running). I'm wondering if the hashrate is being reported incorrectly, or maybe pool difficulty is just playing tricks.

I think it is just slower because the difficulty is higher.

[Vorksholk]

However, it seems to be submitting less shares (less 'accepted')

Are you saying that there are more unaccepted shares? Because if not, that's probably because of a higher difficulty.

Nope, both are at a 100% acceptance rate (after about 10 minutes of running). I'm wondering if the hashrate is being reported incorrectly, or maybe pool difficulty is just playing tricks.

I think it is just slower because the difficulty is higher.

Yeah, I left it running and it seems to have evened out.

In other news, is someone spamming suprnova with bad shares? 2.81% efficiency, 44,114,977 rejected shares.

[e1ghtSpace]

Wow.

[daveolake]

for those with 750's i got them to work with --throughput .5 and no -f ..... apx 1.4 khs per card but no crashing my vid driver. will try bumping up in small amounts happy mining

[crush]

Running my single 780 with the 4.xxx setting from the stock bat file and getting ~6kh solo. Suprnova says I only have 3kh though. Scammer Suprnova, stealing my hash  

[e1ghtSpace]

I'm still mining with my CPU and I will apparently get around 3 SUP/Day

Only 0.70 - 0.82 khash/s

[ocminer]

Wow.

Someone trying to mine SUP with scrypt

[e1ghtSpace]

Wow.

Someone trying to mine SUP with scrypt

Ah lol, not even sha256? What was that person thinking?

Edit: Ah here we go, the price is dropping just like I said it would. Now just a little more...

[daveolake]

for those with 750's i got them to work with --throughput .5 and no -f ..... apx 1.4 khs per card but no crashing my vid driver. will try bumping up in small amounts happy mining

tried --throughput .8 still stable.... by the way my 750's are just the plain 750's not the ti ... also they were crashing the drivers at --throughput 1

[e1ghtSpace]

I'm about to install Ubuntu and see if I get any more hashes out of my CPU.
I will update you guys when it's done.

[ocminer]

Wow.

Someone trying to mine SUP with scrypt

Ah lol, not even sha256? What was that person thinking?

Edit: Ah here we go, the price is dropping just like I said it would. Now just a little more...

Nope, Scrypt.. The Pools auto-bans the user after a certain amount of failed shares, but he tried to try over and over again with a new IP, i've sent him a msg now.. Hopefully he gets it..

[UserAlter]

That doesn't mean what you think it means

It's about 500K max coin, with the block reward halved every 100 days worth of blocks

Thank you, earlz!
Supcoin saves my electric bill. 
245 Watt for 6 750Ti.

[fmz89]

  2sup/day