[ANN] [SUP] Supcoin, PLUCK algorithm, Just Launched, Mine Now!

[ocminer]

...tested coinminers the last 14hours. worked out quite well.
the blockoverview is nearly the same on both pools: last 24h = 133%

but would be nice to get some more hash to get faster block times!

Yes, it'll be really good if the hashes are spread over the pools, fees are the same on both pools so you get the same coins.

why not rise the fees on your pool to make people think about spreading the hash?

I cannot just rise the Fee while miners are mining..  It is like your landlord is rising your rent while you are in the flat

[WigitGetIt]

...tested coinminers the last 14hours. worked out quite well.
the blockoverview is nearly the same on both pools: last 24h = 133%

but would be nice to get some more hash to get faster block times!

Yes, it'll be really good if the hashes are spread over the pools, fees are the same on both pools so you get the same coins.

why not rise the fees on your pool to make people think about spreading the hash?

I cannot just rise the Fee while miners are mining..  It is like your landlord is rising your rent while you are in the flat

Of course you can - it's just a shitty thing to do unless you give them reasonable notice.

Also a good way to shit on your customer base.

[DaMart]

I wanted to try mining this coin and I have set it up as described in the OP, but when I start the batch file, I get an error message:

HTTP request failed: Failed to connect to 127.0.0.1 port 4412: Connection refused

As this is the first time I'm attempting to solomine, I was wondering if anyone knows how I could fix this?

[jc12345]

I wanted to try mining this coin and I have set it up as described in the OP, but when I start the batch file, I get an error message:

HTTP request failed: Failed to connect to 127.0.0.1 port 4412: Connection refused

As this is the first time I'm attempting to solomine, I was wondering if anyone knows how I could fix this?

I think your CPU sees the diff and all the GPUs on the network and says **** this. 

[DaMart]

I wanted to try mining this coin and I have set it up as described in the OP, but when I start the batch file, I get an error message:

HTTP request failed: Failed to connect to 127.0.0.1 port 4412: Connection refused

As this is the first time I'm attempting to solomine, I was wondering if anyone knows how I could fix this?

I think your CPU sees the diff and all the GPUs on the network and says **** this. 

So it's actually not even worth the try anymore? 

[scamkiller]

No AMD miner,no fairness!

[Nthused]

Have any of you guys realized how fresh looking & smooth the wallet is due to it being based on Bitcoin 0.10 (includes headers-first, which significnalty speeds up syncing times)

I'm pretty sure SUP is one of the first ALT's to use its code base too.

[ocminer]

...tested coinminers the last 14hours. worked out quite well.
the blockoverview is nearly the same on both pools: last 24h = 133%

but would be nice to get some more hash to get faster block times!

Yes, it'll be really good if the hashes are spread over the pools, fees are the same on both pools so you get the same coins.

why not rise the fees on your pool to make people think about spreading the hash?

I cannot just rise the Fee while miners are mining..  It is like your landlord is rising your rent while you are in the flat

Of course you can - it's just a shitty thing to do unless you give them reasonable notice.

Also a good way to shit on your customer base.

+1 ;-)

[jc12345]

I wanted to try mining this coin and I have set it up as described in the OP, but when I start the batch file, I get an error message:

HTTP request failed: Failed to connect to 127.0.0.1 port 4412: Connection refused

As this is the first time I'm attempting to solomine, I was wondering if anyone knows how I could fix this?

I think your CPU sees the diff and all the GPUs on the network and says **** this.  

So it's actually not even worth the try anymore?  

Some people look at the diff and decide they don't want to mine with their original Pentium, then tell everyone else it's not worth it. Best approach is to do the math and see if you find the return acceptable or not.

What Wolf says is very true. Personally I am pro fairness and quick to say it is not feasible to mine with CPUs anymore. However, it is so that if you have a very powerful extreme processor that you can compete with the GPUs at this point. You have to do the maths and do a test and see how your CPU KH/s compare to that of GPUs.

[LTCMAXMYR]

Code:

	//note: off-by-one error is likely here...     
	for(int i = size - 64 - 1; i >= 64; i -= 64)       
		sha256_hash512(hashbuffer + i - 64, hashbuffer + i);

the minimize i is 127,and the last affect hashbuffer pos is 63
the target compare left 32byte
so this code is actually not used.

if skip this code, the cpu miner may be 10% faster.

[kitaco]

I wanted to try mining this coin and I have set it up as described in the OP, but when I start the batch file, I get an error message:

HTTP request failed: Failed to connect to 127.0.0.1 port 4412: Connection refused

As this is the first time I'm attempting to solomine, I was wondering if anyone knows how I could fix this?

I think your CPU sees the diff and all the GPUs on the network and says **** this.  

So it's actually not even worth the try anymore?  

Some people look at the diff and decide they don't want to mine with their original Pentium, then tell everyone else it's not worth it. Best approach is to do the math and see if you find the return acceptable or not.

What Wolf says is very true. Personally I am pro fairness and quick to say it is not feasible to mine with CPUs anymore. However, it is so that if you have a very powerful extreme processor that you can compete with the GPUs at this point. You have to do the maths and do a test and see how your CPU KH/s compare to that of GPUs.

GPU's aren't even really that great on Pluck. With Wolf0's binary I am getting 2.5x what my GPU does, on my 4770k @ 4.5Ghz. I kind of love this algo. It's fair between CPU and GPU (suck it AMD ).

[jc12345]

I wanted to try mining this coin and I have set it up as described in the OP, but when I start the batch file, I get an error message:

HTTP request failed: Failed to connect to 127.0.0.1 port 4412: Connection refused

As this is the first time I'm attempting to solomine, I was wondering if anyone knows how I could fix this?

I think your CPU sees the diff and all the GPUs on the network and says **** this.  

So it's actually not even worth the try anymore?  

Some people look at the diff and decide they don't want to mine with their original Pentium, then tell everyone else it's not worth it. Best approach is to do the math and see if you find the return acceptable or not.

What Wolf says is very true. Personally I am pro fairness and quick to say it is not feasible to mine with CPUs anymore. However, it is so that if you have a very powerful extreme processor that you can compete with the GPUs at this point. You have to do the maths and do a test and see how your CPU KH/s compare to that of GPUs.

GPU's aren't even really that great on Pluck. With Wolf0's binary I am getting 2.5x what my GPU does, on my 4770k @ 4.5Ghz. I kind of love this algo. It's fair between CPU and GPU (suck it AMD ).

Iv since put my CPUs back on the mining, but only the ones in PCs that have to be on in anyways. The price prospects look positive it seems.

[ipwn7474]

Code:

	//note: off-by-one error is likely here...     
	for(int i = size - 64 - 1; i >= 64; i -= 64)       
		sha256_hash512(hashbuffer + i - 64, hashbuffer + i);

the minimize i is 127,and the last affect hashbuffer pos is 63
the target compare left 32byte
so this code is actually not used.

if skip this code, the cpu miner may be 10% faster.

sorry for the noob comment but how exactly would somone use this code to help with cpu miner because I have no idea whats going on here 

[kitaco]

Code:

	//note: off-by-one error is likely here...     
	for(int i = size - 64 - 1; i >= 64; i -= 64)       
		sha256_hash512(hashbuffer + i - 64, hashbuffer + i);

the minimize i is 127,and the last affect hashbuffer pos is 63
the target compare left 32byte
so this code is actually not used.

if skip this code, the cpu miner may be 10% faster.

sorry for the noob comment but how exactly would somone use this code to help with cpu miner because I have no idea whats going on here 

By removing it.

[ipwn7474]

Code:

	//note: off-by-one error is likely here...     
	for(int i = size - 64 - 1; i >= 64; i -= 64)       
		sha256_hash512(hashbuffer + i - 64, hashbuffer + i);

the minimize i is 127,and the last affect hashbuffer pos is 63
the target compare left 32byte
so this code is actually not used.

if skip this code, the cpu miner may be 10% faster.

sorry for the noob comment but how exactly would somone use this code to help with cpu miner because I have no idea whats going on here 

By removing it.

how would one go about removing this code?

[LTCMAXMYR]

Code:

	//note: off-by-one error is likely here...     
	for(int i = size - 64 - 1; i >= 64; i -= 64)       
		sha256_hash512(hashbuffer + i - 64, hashbuffer + i);

the minimize i is 127,and the last affect hashbuffer pos is 63
the target compare left 32byte
so this code is actually not used.

if skip this code, the cpu miner may be 10% faster.

sorry for the noob comment but how exactly would somone use this code to help with cpu miner because I have no idea whats going on here 

By removing it.

how would one go about removing this code?

he would mine 10% faster.
i noticed the gpu miner had removed this code,

[aikklond]

Code:

	//note: off-by-one error is likely here...     
	for(int i = size - 64 - 1; i >= 64; i -= 64)       
		sha256_hash512(hashbuffer + i - 64, hashbuffer + i);

the minimize i is 127,and the last affect hashbuffer pos is 63
the target compare left 32byte
so this code is actually not used.

if skip this code, the cpu miner may be 10% faster.

sorry for the noob comment but how exactly would somone use this code to help with cpu miner because I have no idea whats going on here  

By removing it.

how would one go about removing this code?

The point is we need someone with basic compile knowledge, that wants to help the coin's fair distribution to update the miners.

I believe earlz  can arrange this easily

[AliMan]

I think this is the only coin where I can run my 980's at 1.6 Ghz.

[fmz89]

Yeah if wolf0 realese cpu optimization, made equilibrium with nvidia miner,

[aikklond]

Yeah if wolf0 realese cpu optimization, made equilibrium with nvidia miner,

I said we need someone whose best interest is that the coin's distribution is fair...