sgk
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1002
!! HODL !!
|
|
April 27, 2015, 05:08:55 PM |
|
So the funds generated from the raffle will be used towards adding support for $NEOS on GoURL.io platform? Are we already in discussion with GoURL? The funds were put towards paid votes there but it seems pointless. The thread discussing the outcome and so forth is over here: http://forum.neoscoin.com/t/lets-get-neos-on-gourl/396/86 We're putting our efforts into more worthwhile goals. Best regards, syntaks Thanks for the link to thread, I hadn't notice earlier. When something like that is crafted, you don't have a fair chance. Anyway, its good that we stear clear of paid voting rat race and spend our energy and time on something substantial and honest.
|
|
|
|
|
sgk
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1002
!! HODL !!
|
|
May 07, 2015, 06:18:18 AM |
|
Well.. it isn't loading right now, but I checked it couple of days ago when it was working. Interesting. I can see the first one is verified as Bittrex. Similarly I assume the next 2 or 3 addresses belonging to other exchanges. Becauuse that's quite some quantity to have (250k NEOS). If they belong to individuals, I envy them
|
|
|
|
twoturtles (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 07, 2015, 01:05:41 PM |
|
Well.. it isn't loading right now, but I checked it couple of days ago when it was working. Interesting. I can see the first one is verified as Bittrex. Similarly I assume the next 2 or 3 addresses belonging to other exchanges. Becauuse that's quite some quantity to have (250k NEOS). If they belong to individuals, I envy them You and me both =)
|
|
|
|
Coin-Moron
|
|
May 08, 2015, 03:33:52 AM |
|
What do we have the next in our pipeline?
|
|
|
|
twoturtles (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 08, 2015, 02:31:08 PM |
|
What do we have the next in our pipeline?
Waiting for a few things to come together and then a lot of coding =)
|
|
|
|
twoturtles (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 10, 2015, 12:16:05 AM |
|
What do we have the next in our pipeline?
I'm experimenting with some blockchain ideas, but we're also entertaining the idea of PoS. We don't want to go the traditional PoS route, we'd rather do something more unique and productive. There are still a few features that need some further work done in 2.1, but that's pending for a few reasons. It's definitely been a busy period of time recently and bound to only get more intense. Best regards, syntaks
|
|
|
|
Jonesd
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1014
|
|
May 15, 2015, 11:24:38 AM |
|
What do we have the next in our pipeline?
I'm experimenting with some blockchain ideas, but we're also entertaining the idea of PoS. We don't want to go the traditional PoS route, we'd rather do something more unique and productive. There are still a few features that need some further work done in 2.1, but that's pending for a few reasons. It's definitely been a busy period of time recently and bound to only get more intense. Best regards, syntaks POS is a good distributed approach, but can also prove to be quite risky as it often has blockchain issues. Many coins have died off after a wrong implementation. When done well, on the other hand, it is less centralized than PoW is, so I prefer it. Hoarding of coins is an issue, though.
|
Co-Founder and Managing Partner of Block Bastards
|
|
|
twoturtles (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 15, 2015, 04:26:28 PM |
|
What do we have the next in our pipeline?
I'm experimenting with some blockchain ideas, but we're also entertaining the idea of PoS. We don't want to go the traditional PoS route, we'd rather do something more unique and productive. There are still a few features that need some further work done in 2.1, but that's pending for a few reasons. It's definitely been a busy period of time recently and bound to only get more intense. Best regards, syntaks POS is a good distributed approach, but can also prove to be quite risky as it often has blockchain issues. Many coins have died off after a wrong implementation. When done well, on the other hand, it is less centralized than PoW is, so I prefer it. Hoarding of coins is an issue, though. We've thought about this and share the same feelings, believe me. I'm not a huge fan of PoS, however, I have some ideas I'm going to be fabricating into a staging chain and I'll release details after I've verified it's feasible. =)
|
|
|
|
Jonesd
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1014
|
|
May 15, 2015, 04:37:03 PM |
|
What do we have the next in our pipeline?
I'm experimenting with some blockchain ideas, but we're also entertaining the idea of PoS. We don't want to go the traditional PoS route, we'd rather do something more unique and productive. There are still a few features that need some further work done in 2.1, but that's pending for a few reasons. It's definitely been a busy period of time recently and bound to only get more intense. Best regards, syntaks POS is a good distributed approach, but can also prove to be quite risky as it often has blockchain issues. Many coins have died off after a wrong implementation. When done well, on the other hand, it is less centralized than PoW is, so I prefer it. Hoarding of coins is an issue, though. We've thought about this and share the same feelings, believe me. I'm not a huge fan of PoS, however, I have some ideas I'm going to be fabricating into a staging chain and I'll release details after I've verified it's feasible. =) The main issue usually is blockchain bloat, as so many people have to be rewarded, some time with several addresses containing tiny amounts of coins. Perhaps a threshold for minimum amount of coins to stake could work? Require addresses to have at least 0.01% of total coin amount, for example. Looking forward to the progress!
|
Co-Founder and Managing Partner of Block Bastards
|
|
|
twoturtles (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 15, 2015, 10:51:11 PM |
|
I'm very happy to announce that we are now supported by CoinPayments.net! It doesn't stop there. Give us a bit of time to code and we'll see what we can do here. =)
Best regards,
syntaks
|
|
|
|
tempus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1960
Merit: 1128
|
|
May 15, 2015, 11:05:54 PM |
|
Impossible not being optimistic... and excited about this ongoing progress! :-)
|
|
|
|
twoturtles (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 15, 2015, 11:20:34 PM |
|
There's always progress here whether we advertise it or not. We're don't spend our time hyping, it's better spent thinking of improvements and so forth. =)
Best regards,
syntaks
|
|
|
|
tempus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1960
Merit: 1128
|
|
May 15, 2015, 11:27:00 PM |
|
There's always progress here whether we advertise it or not. We're don't spend our time hyping, it's better spent thinking of improvements and so forth. =)
Best regards,
syntaks
Absolutely! That's why I'm always optimistic and excited about this project! ;-)
|
|
|
|
raze182
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 163
Merit: 100
A légpárnás hajóm tele van angolnákkal.
|
|
May 19, 2015, 03:33:00 AM |
|
Quick question: Is there a way to export the private key from my wallet?
|
Xtrdw361DvoyDhxL5XoeAvTxTPvM4dXuLW
|
|
|
twoturtles (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 19, 2015, 03:49:25 AM |
|
Quick question: Is there a way to export the private key from my wallet?
I'll add that into the queue as a tool to be added. For now would you be comfortable with using the daemon? Best regards, syntaks
|
|
|
|
raze182
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 163
Merit: 100
A légpárnás hajóm tele van angolnákkal.
|
|
May 19, 2015, 05:52:11 AM |
|
Quick question: Is there a way to export the private key from my wallet?
I'll add that into the queue as a tool to be added. For now would you be comfortable with using the daemon? Best regards, syntaks Thanks, that would be a useful tool. Can't say I've ever used a daemon before, unfortunately.
|
Xtrdw361DvoyDhxL5XoeAvTxTPvM4dXuLW
|
|
|
twoturtles (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 19, 2015, 06:10:13 AM |
|
Quick question: Is there a way to export the private key from my wallet?
I'll add that into the queue as a tool to be added. For now would you be comfortable with using the daemon? Best regards, syntaks Thanks, that would be a useful tool. Can't say I've ever used a daemon before, unfortunately. What system are you running on? Best regards, syntaks
|
|
|
|
raze182
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 163
Merit: 100
A légpárnás hajóm tele van angolnákkal.
|
|
May 19, 2015, 09:20:08 AM |
|
Quick question: Is there a way to export the private key from my wallet?
I'll add that into the queue as a tool to be added. For now would you be comfortable with using the daemon? Best regards, syntaks Thanks, that would be a useful tool. Can't say I've ever used a daemon before, unfortunately. What system are you running on? Best regards, syntaks Windows.
|
Xtrdw361DvoyDhxL5XoeAvTxTPvM4dXuLW
|
|
|
eXpl0sive
|
|
May 19, 2015, 01:00:04 PM |
|
What do we have the next in our pipeline?
I'm experimenting with some blockchain ideas, but we're also entertaining the idea of PoS. We don't want to go the traditional PoS route, we'd rather do something more unique and productive. There are still a few features that need some further work done in 2.1, but that's pending for a few reasons. It's definitely been a busy period of time recently and bound to only get more intense. Best regards, syntaks POS is a good distributed approach, but can also prove to be quite risky as it often has blockchain issues. Many coins have died off after a wrong implementation. When done well, on the other hand, it is less centralized than PoW is, so I prefer it. Hoarding of coins is an issue, though. We've thought about this and share the same feelings, believe me. I'm not a huge fan of PoS, however, I have some ideas I'm going to be fabricating into a staging chain and I'll release details after I've verified it's feasible. =) Some people are having a discussion about the success/failures and associated risks of going POS here on this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1065172.0With PoW there's a cost associated with producing a coin with mining equipment and electricity so miners won't sell their coins any cheaper than that which creates a floor price. With PoS there is no cost of production, you just have to own and hold coins which also means that everybody can stake their coins. Another significant difference is that newly generated PoS coins are going to people who are already holding the coins as a reward. That is generally not true for PoW. And more coins mean inflation so in essence PoS coins are rewarding stakers with free coins at the cost of inflation. Personally it doesn't make sense to me why anyone would invest into PoS coins especially considering the average lifespan of coins and how rapidly things change in crypto - but that's jut me.
So I'm not saying we shouldn't go POS but we should give it a careful attention before making the leap if we do. Because once we go POS, its never going back to POW.
|
|
|
|
|