Title: I'm back! Post by: zhoutong on April 23, 2013, 02:55:08 AM It has been exactly 345 days since I left Bitcoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=81581.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=81581.0)).
Nothing really has changed, except the soaring prices (it doesn't have a lot to do with me other than seeing my out-of-pocket 5,000 BTC personal compensation is valued at >$1 million at peak, that was over 80% of my entire Bitcoin savings and I didn't purchase more after the incident). Bitcoinica LP is still not liquidated with zero progress of the fund return. In fact, I have been following the forum for some time (I changed my forum account password to resist my temptation to login again). I have been searching my name every 9 days ever since I logged out last time. When I left Bitcoin, I felt that I was not adding value to the economy by developing Bitcoinica because speculation is a zero-sum game. But now after seeing speculative activity sky-rocketing without a viable solution to short Bitcoin: I'm feeling a bit regretful that I sold Bitcoinica. Without selling Bitcoinica, the Linode hack would still happen, but the platform can still survive with the profits it generated. There wouldn't be the Rackspace hack or the Mt. Gox hack because the email server wouldn't be compromised and the source code wouldn't be leaked by an insider. The platform might still be around to serve Bitcoiners by maintaining the price stability more effectively than a single long-only exchange. But that's daydream. I'm not going to start another Bitcoin exchange. Bitcoin is not just a speculative vehicle. It's the first currency/commodity/whatever with both 1) strictly limited quantities and 2) native mechanism to be transmitted over data networks. We desperately need killer apps that make Bitcoin a truly global alternative currency that replaces some of the functions of the traditional banking system. (Note that I'm not so ambitious that Bitcoin will replace fiat currencies. I think it's more beneficial to the world economy by being a parallel/alternative currency, like gold. This is just an opinion, though.) The Bitcoin community has given me nightmares (mainly the reputation hit) but I'm never giving up on Bitcoin. True believers are going to be believers forever. I don't really have any clear ideas at the moment, but I'll be more than happy to build a killer app for Bitcoin from stratch. If you have any thoughts, feel free to PM me or email me at bitcointalk@zhoutong.com. I'm also answering any questions you have in this thread. I really hope that I can provide valuable service to the community and regain the lost trust/reputation by building something really useful. PS> Despite my repeated clarifications, I want to say the same thing again: As I had no financial interest in Bitcoinica LP after early 2012, I had no savings that were owed or distributable to Bitcoinica creditors other than the 5000 BTC compensation out of my personal funds. As I was neither the director nor an owner of any Bitcoinica-related entity since then, I had no power to do anything to help the creditors. I know a lot of people are being hurt by the incident. So is me. I really hope that my previous compensation was valuable and useful to the people being hurt. 5000 BTC at peak Bitcoin price was several multiples of Bitcoinica's sale price but I had no regret for doing something I could to help people in need. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Sword Smith on April 23, 2013, 02:56:46 AM Great to have you back. Thanks for the music videos in the meantime!
Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: zhoutong on April 23, 2013, 02:57:54 AM Great to have you back. Thanks for the music videos in the meantime! I'm pretty sure that I don't deserve the attribution of the videos. I didn't have time to enjoy them but I will when I'm bored. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: QuestionAuthority on April 23, 2013, 03:01:18 AM Fascinating! It seems like no one can ever really stay away from this place. I guess the next thread will be started by Pirate or Clipse.
Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Sword Smith on April 23, 2013, 03:01:56 AM Great to have you back. Thanks for the music videos in the meantime! I'm pretty sure that I don't deserve the attribution of the videos. I didn't have time to enjoy them but I will when I'm bored. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Frozenlock on April 23, 2013, 03:02:00 AM Fascinating! It seems like no one can ever really stay away from this place. I guess the next thread will be started by Pirate or Clipse. Satoshi? ;) Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Remember remember the 5th of November on April 23, 2013, 03:03:56 AM Fascinating! It seems like no one can ever really stay away from this place. I guess the next thread will be started by Pirate or Clipse. Satoshi? ;) Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Sword Smith on April 23, 2013, 03:04:43 AM Fascinating! It seems like no one can ever really stay away from this place. I guess the next thread will be started by Pirate or Clipse. Satoshi? ;) Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: oakpacific on April 23, 2013, 03:05:36 AM Great to have you back. Thanks for the music videos in the meantime! I'm pretty sure that I don't deserve the attribution of the videos. I didn't have time to enjoy them but I will when I'm bored. Pretty much said it, OP'd better stay low key. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Sword Smith on April 23, 2013, 03:07:22 AM Great to have you back. Thanks for the music videos in the meantime! I'm pretty sure that I don't deserve the attribution of the videos. I didn't have time to enjoy them but I will when I'm bored. Pretty much said it, OP'd better stay low key. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: oakpacific on April 23, 2013, 03:08:24 AM Great to have you back. Thanks for the music videos in the meantime! I'm pretty sure that I don't deserve the attribution of the videos. I didn't have time to enjoy them but I will when I'm bored. Pretty much said it, OP'd better stay low key. Me too, I just think he needs a reminder as you have so implicitly put. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: zhoutong on April 23, 2013, 03:13:02 AM Fascinating! It seems like no one can ever really stay away from this place. I guess the next thread will be started by Pirate or Clipse. I'm a little disturbed by the fact that I'm being compared to users with scammer tags. But anyway, hope Satoshi will be back soon. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: justusranvier on April 23, 2013, 03:14:40 AM Great to have you back. Thanks for the music videos in the meantime! The videos were made by ZhouTonged (http://www.youtube.com/user/zhoutonged). Completely different person.Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: jimbobway on April 23, 2013, 03:15:15 AM ZT, how do u feel about the funder of bitcoinica is now a funder of coinlab?
Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: zhoutong on April 23, 2013, 03:16:39 AM Great to have you back. Thanks for the music videos in the meantime! The videos were made by ZhouTonged (http://www.youtube.com/user/zhoutonged). Completely different person.I assumed the quoted reply was sarcasm. But if not, yeah, totally different. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: zhoutong on April 23, 2013, 03:19:07 AM ZT, how do u feel about the funder of bitcoinica is now a funder of coinlab? I have nothing but gratefulness for Tihan. Regardless of the result, he literally changed my life. I wouldn't ever call myself an entrepreneur without his support. For the CoinLab thing, I really have no comment at the moment. I didn't follow this company very closely. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Remember remember the 5th of November on April 23, 2013, 03:21:11 AM ZT, how do u feel about the funder of bitcoinica is now a funder of coinlab? I have nothing but gratefulness for Tihan. Regardless of the result, he literally changed my life. I wouldn't ever call myself an entrepreneur without his support. For the CoinLab thing, I really have no comment at the moment. I didn't follow this company very closely. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: zhoutong on April 23, 2013, 03:25:05 AM ZT, how do u feel about the funder of bitcoinica is now a funder of coinlab? I have nothing but gratefulness for Tihan. Regardless of the result, he literally changed my life. I wouldn't ever call myself an entrepreneur without his support. For the CoinLab thing, I really have no comment at the moment. I didn't follow this company very closely. I'm 18 years old. I personally hold less than 100 BTC and I have given my family a 100 BTC gold-plated bar plus 28 Casascius Series I coins (so technically no longer mine). I have sold the 1000 BTC during the recent price spike for some investment in a new company (unrelated to Bitcoin or domains). Another (minor) reason was that I felt that Bitcoin was overpriced. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Remember remember the 5th of November on April 23, 2013, 03:27:18 AM Just 2 years older than me, and you have more money than I ever will, unless of course I move to ASIC fast. Personally I wanted to start a Bitcoin service myself, but apparently nothing is hacker-proof, but unlike you, I would not have the money to repay anyone, and because I saw what people are capable here, they can easily send you(referring to myself) to jail...
If you have any tips regarding these hacks, which might be helpful, please do share. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Matthew N. Wright on April 23, 2013, 03:28:11 AM I had a question that repentance had answered previously, but I wanted to get clarification.
When AurumXChange locked up your funds (was it like $50,000?), you said they never gave it back (even to this day), but repentance said it wasn't your funds but your friends, so there is no way to get it back. Can you clarify? Honestly, I don't care about those funds or your friend, I just don't like the idea of MtGox, AurumXChange, etc jacking funds from people whenever they personally feel it's legitimate to do so (without any legal request to do so) and then never answering questions about it later. Where did that money even go? Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: kentrolla on April 23, 2013, 03:31:43 AM welcome back!
Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: QuestionAuthority on April 23, 2013, 03:40:20 AM I had a question that repentance had answered previously, but I wanted to get clarification. When AurumXChange locked up your funds (was it like $50,000?), you said they never gave it back (even to this day), but repentance said it wasn't your funds but your friends, so there is no way to get it back. Can you clarify? Honestly, I don't care about those funds or your friend, I just don't like the idea of MtGox, AurumXChange, etc jacking funds from people whenever they personally feel it's legitimate to do so (without any legal request to do so) and then never answering questions about it later. Where did that money even go? Roberto and the gang at AurumXchange are scummy pieces of crap. Would you honestly expect him to give back the funds or discuss his theft of the money? Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: zhoutong on April 23, 2013, 03:42:24 AM I had a question that repentance had answered previously, but I wanted to get clarification. When AurumXChange locked up your funds (was it like $50,000?), you said they never gave it back (even to this day), but repentance said it wasn't your funds but your friends, so there is no way to get it back. Can you clarify? Honestly, I don't care about those funds or your friend, I just don't like the idea of MtGox, AurumXChange, etc jacking funds from people whenever they personally feel it's legitimate to do so (without any legal request to do so) and then never answering questions about it later. Where did that money even go? I was doing a LR->USD exchange for a Singapore friend (total $100K, and $30K in XMLGold, $40K in AurumXChange, and the rest OTC). He paid me $100K in LR and I paid my friend $100K in full (taking a huge loss), so the $40K should be mine. It's a transfer from my LR account to my bank account. It's never a third-party transfer like some other said. At that time, I told CJH (the Bitcoinica hacker) about AurumXChange's accusation (I had to tell). He decided to withhold $40K from the payment to Patrick Murck. I asked him not to, but he persisted. Later, he gave me a verified Alipay account with $40K equivalent in CNY. I didn't bother to touch the funds because AurumXChange was lying to me about their correspondence. (To date I still haven't received a single email from them, despite their false claims on the forum). Now CJH is gone (phone: powered off, QQ: offline, email: no response) and the Alipay account got its password changed (most likely by him after withdrawing the funds). So AurumXChange has succeeded in ripping off $40K by using the coincidence of Bitcoinica hack and my Singapore trip (I can even show anyone my passport stamps of leaving Australia during the hack, PM me). There was no AML investigation and I didn't receive anything. I allowed them to send to Bitcoinica because I felt it's better in Bitcoinica creditors' hands rather than theirs. No matter how they feel about whether it's an insider job or not (it's not), they have my full consent to send money to Bitcoinica. (Even if it's really an insider job, the money should also be sent to Bitcoinica, with or without my consent). But they clearly didn't do anything and kept the funds for themselves. I'm no longer mad at them but I still hope AurumXchange can do the right thing. I will take the reputation hit as a punishment for not choosing business partners carefully (the Bitcoinica Consultancy) and it's understandable that AurumXchange wanted to do good for the community by revealing suspects. EDIT WITH PROOF: Bitcoinica was hacked on July 13 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=93074.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=93074.0) Depart Australia: (Passport Number blocked off) https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/6936226/exit.jpg Enter Australia: (Passport Number blocked off) https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/6936226/entry.jpg Flight Ticket: (Frequent Flyer number and Ticket number blocked off) (Note that the original flight were oversold, so I travelled on the 14th of July instead of 13th.) https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/6936226/ticket.jpg Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Matthew N. Wright on April 23, 2013, 03:46:17 AM I had a question that repentance had answered previously, but I wanted to get clarification. When AurumXChange locked up your funds (was it like $50,000?), you said they never gave it back (even to this day), but repentance said it wasn't your funds but your friends, so there is no way to get it back. Can you clarify? Honestly, I don't care about those funds or your friend, I just don't like the idea of MtGox, AurumXChange, etc jacking funds from people whenever they personally feel it's legitimate to do so (without any legal request to do so) and then never answering questions about it later. Where did that money even go? I was doing a LR->USD exchange for a Singapore friend (total $100K, and $30K in XMLGold, $40K in AurumXChange, and the rest OTC). He paid me $100K in LR and I paid my friend $100K in full (taking a huge loss), so the $40K should be mine. It's a transfer from my LR account to my bank account. It's never a third-party transfer like some other said. At that time, I told CJH (the Bitcoinica hacker) about AurumXChange's accusation (I had to tell). He decided to withhold $40K from the payment to Patrick Murck. I asked him not to, but he persisted. Later, he gave me a verified Alipay account with $40K equivalent in CNY. I didn't bother to touch the funds because AurumXChange was lying to me about their correspondence. (To date I still haven't received a single email from them, despite their false claims on the forum). Now CJH is gone (phone: powered off, QQ: offline, email: no response) and the Alipay account got its password changed (most likely by him after withdrawing the funds). So AurumXChange has succeeded in ripping off $40K by using the coincidence of Bitcoinica hack and my Singapore trip (I can even show anyone my passport stamps of leaving Australia during the hack, PM me). There was no AML investigation and I didn't receive anything. I allowed them to send to Bitcoinica because I felt it's better in Bitcoinica creditors' hands rather than theirs. No matter how they feel about whether it's an insider job or not (it's not), they have my full consent to send money to Bitcoinica. (Even if it's really an insider job, the money should also be sent to Bitcoinica, with or without my consent). But they clearly didn't do anything and kept the funds for themselves. I'm no longer mad at them but I still hope AurumXchange can do the right thing. I will take the reputation hit as a punishment for not choosing business partners carefully (the Bitcoinica Consultancy) and it's understandable that AurumXchange wanted to do good for the community by revealing suspects. Thank you for clarifying what I had suspected. I don't feel so bad for how I originally reacted to them now. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: zhoutong on April 23, 2013, 03:58:40 AM I had a question that repentance had answered previously, but I wanted to get clarification. When AurumXChange locked up your funds (was it like $50,000?), you said they never gave it back (even to this day), but repentance said it wasn't your funds but your friends, so there is no way to get it back. Can you clarify? Honestly, I don't care about those funds or your friend, I just don't like the idea of MtGox, AurumXChange, etc jacking funds from people whenever they personally feel it's legitimate to do so (without any legal request to do so) and then never answering questions about it later. Where did that money even go? I was doing a LR->USD exchange for a Singapore friend (total $100K, and $30K in XMLGold, $40K in AurumXChange, and the rest OTC). He paid me $100K in LR and I paid my friend $100K in full (taking a huge loss), so the $40K should be mine. It's a transfer from my LR account to my bank account. It's never a third-party transfer like some other said. At that time, I told CJH (the Bitcoinica hacker) about AurumXChange's accusation (I had to tell). He decided to withhold $40K from the payment to Patrick Murck. I asked him not to, but he persisted. Later, he gave me a verified Alipay account with $40K equivalent in CNY. I didn't bother to touch the funds because AurumXChange was lying to me about their correspondence. (To date I still haven't received a single email from them, despite their false claims on the forum). Now CJH is gone (phone: powered off, QQ: offline, email: no response) and the Alipay account got its password changed (most likely by him after withdrawing the funds). So AurumXChange has succeeded in ripping off $40K by using the coincidence of Bitcoinica hack and my Singapore trip (I can even show anyone my passport stamps of leaving Australia during the hack, PM me). There was no AML investigation and I didn't receive anything. I allowed them to send to Bitcoinica because I felt it's better in Bitcoinica creditors' hands rather than theirs. No matter how they feel about whether it's an insider job or not (it's not), they have my full consent to send money to Bitcoinica. (Even if it's really an insider job, the money should also be sent to Bitcoinica, with or without my consent). But they clearly didn't do anything and kept the funds for themselves. I'm no longer mad at them but I still hope AurumXchange can do the right thing. I will take the reputation hit as a punishment for not choosing business partners carefully (the Bitcoinica Consultancy) and it's understandable that AurumXchange wanted to do good for the community by revealing suspects. Thank you for clarifying what I had suspected. I don't feel so bad for how I originally reacted to them now. Thank you for your trust and support. I have updated my previous reply with travel proof. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Transisto on April 23, 2013, 05:48:19 AM ... I know a lot of people are being hurt by the incident. So is me. I really hope that my previous compensation was valuable and useful to the people being hurt. 5000 BTC at peak Bitcoin price was several multiples of Bitcoinica's sale price but I had no regret for doing something I could to help people in need....[/size] Answer me this please. The main reason Bitcoinica fund haven't been returned yet is because the database of who is owed what has "vanished". How have you managed to pay a fair share of 5000btc to creditors if nobody else can ? I had made a claim to you very early but, Your form was poorly constructed to account for open positions You didn't read the note field. And proceeded to full payment the day later. You've skipped over my claim in the same way you've paid bogus claims. I hold you and your imaginary friend "Chen" as the only suspect to that last theft (With a mountain of evidences). Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Elwar on April 23, 2013, 06:23:37 AM You say that there is no place to short bitcoins but Bitfinex is up and running using your code from Bitcoinica.
Have you checked that out? Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: bitdragon on April 23, 2013, 08:13:32 AM You say that there is no place to short bitcoins but Bitfinex is up and running using your code from Bitcoinica. Have you checked that out? You can buy Put options through MPEX. It's not quite the Addictive nature of margin trading ala bitcoinica but definitely has a place in a solid financial plan. And dare I say that the security model inspires. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: greyhawk on April 23, 2013, 08:43:42 AM Oh look who it is.
How is the Chinese relic hunter multi-billionaire triad boss über hacker? Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: zhoutong on April 23, 2013, 08:48:03 AM ... I know a lot of people are being hurt by the incident. So is me. I really hope that my previous compensation was valuable and useful to the people being hurt. 5000 BTC at peak Bitcoin price was several multiples of Bitcoinica's sale price but I had no regret for doing something I could to help people in need....[/size] Answer me this please. The main reason Bitcoinica fund haven't been returned yet is because the database of who is owed what has "vanished". How have you managed to pay a fair share of 5000btc to creditors if nobody else can ? I had made a claim to you very early but, Your form was poorly constructed to account for open positions You didn't read the note field. And proceeded to full payment the day later. You've skipped over my claim in the same way you've paid bogus claims. I hold you and your imaginary friend "Chen" as the only suspect to that last theft (With a mountain of evidences). OK. The 5000 BTC is my personal funds, so I get to decide how to distribute and allocate. You are Bitcoinica's creditor, not mine. At the beginning it was not meant to be a replacement of Bitcoinica's compensation claim. I just wanted to help, whether equitable or not. I assumed everyone was honest. I didn't have the time to carefully examine each claim, so I went through very quickly to filter bonus ones. Since I believe it's better to pass a bonus claim rather than fail an honest claim, my standard was not strict. I'm sorry if you think the process is unfair. But that's over 80% of my entire Bitcoin savings. Mt. Gox is currently withholding Bitcoinica's assets distributable to Bitcoinica creditors including at least 20000 BTC (I'm not sure of the exact numbers). That's where the money should come from. I was just making a donation to people who were affected. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: zhoutong on April 23, 2013, 08:51:14 AM ... I know a lot of people are being hurt by the incident. So is me. I really hope that my previous compensation was valuable and useful to the people being hurt. 5000 BTC at peak Bitcoin price was several multiples of Bitcoinica's sale price but I had no regret for doing something I could to help people in need....[/size] Answer me this please. The main reason Bitcoinica fund haven't been returned yet is because the database of who is owed what has "vanished". How have you managed to pay a fair share of 5000btc to creditors if nobody else can ? I had made a claim to you very early but, Your form was poorly constructed to account for open positions You didn't read the note field. And proceeded to full payment the day later. You've skipped over my claim in the same way you've paid bogus claims. I hold you and your imaginary friend "Chen" as the only suspect to that last theft (With a mountain of evidences). Zhou can you please post a copy of your police report of your charges against Chen? Or did you not file a report because he is not a real person? Neither. I didn't because I was not a victim. I didn't assume the obligation to do this as a former developer of Bitcoinica. Also, he did return majority of the hacked funds, but in the wrong form of assets unfortunately (he sold some Bitcoins). In any case, almost all distributable assets are with Mt. Gox now. I'm not here to judge whether they should withhold the funds or not, as I don't know anything about the liquidator. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: zhoutong on April 23, 2013, 08:52:47 AM You say that there is no place to short bitcoins but Bitfinex is up and running using your code from Bitcoinica. Have you checked that out? Yes. I'm not so sure whether the code is based on Bitcoinica. Anyway, I think there's still no trading venue that has the amount of trades that Bitcoinica had. At its peak Bitcoinica had 150000 BTC open interest. That's what I mean by "viable way of shorting". Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: zhoutong on April 23, 2013, 08:53:36 AM You say that there is no place to short bitcoins but Bitfinex is up and running using your code from Bitcoinica. Have you checked that out? You can buy Put options through MPEX. It's not quite the Addictive nature of margin trading ala bitcoinica but definitely has a place in a solid financial plan. And dare I say that the security model inspires. Yeah, I like MPEX's model. I think it'll inspire me a lot if I'm going to start another Bitcoin venture (IF). Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: zhoutong on April 23, 2013, 08:56:40 AM Oh look who it is. How is the Chinese relic hunter multi-billionaire triad boss über hacker? Unfortunately he can't be reached any more. It's always easy to just go offline forever. He did return majority of the funds, just not in the right combination of USD and BTC. I don't think he enjoys the incident. He is/was living in Heilongjiang Province, which is too cold for me to even travel there (I go to China only during fall or winter). I don't think the address is where he lives though. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: greyhawk on April 23, 2013, 09:08:17 AM Yeah history has shown it to be extremely difficult sometimes to contact imaginary people.
Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Remember remember the 5th of November on April 23, 2013, 09:59:28 AM Oh look who it is. How is the Chinese relic hunter multi-billionaire triad boss über hacker? Unfortunately he can't be reached any more. It's always easy to just go offline forever. He did return majority of the funds, just not in the right combination of USD and BTC. I don't think he enjoys the incident. He is/was living in Heilongjiang Province, which is too cold for me to even travel there (I go to China only during fall or winter). I don't think the address is where he lives though. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: cnbtcnews on April 23, 2013, 11:30:28 AM Welcome back
Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: El Cabron on April 23, 2013, 11:45:30 AM Oh look who it is. How is the Chinese relic hunter multi-billionaire triad boss über hacker? Unfortunately he can't be reached any more. It's always easy to just go offline forever. He did return majority of the funds, just not in the right combination of USD and BTC. I don't think he enjoys the incident. He is/was living in Heilongjiang Province, which is too cold for me to even travel there (I go to China only during fall or winter). I don't think the address is where he lives though. Made up people often live in cold places. Just look at Santa. Matthew the two time scammer tag troll you paid trying to make you look like the victim in all of this is not going to work out too well. It would be best to assist in cleaning up your first mess (bitcoinica and its "hack") before you make a new project. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: bennett616 on April 23, 2013, 12:04:30 PM Welcome back :)
Andy B Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: bitclown on April 23, 2013, 12:22:51 PM Lesson for aspiring Bitcoin scammers: When caught red-handed (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=95738.0), just make up bizarre fairytales with shakespearean characters and amazing coincidences. You'll get a free pass and will be praised by the community.
Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: zhoutong on April 23, 2013, 12:53:00 PM Oh look who it is. How is the Chinese relic hunter multi-billionaire triad boss über hacker? Unfortunately he can't be reached any more. It's always easy to just go offline forever. He did return majority of the funds, just not in the right combination of USD and BTC. I don't think he enjoys the incident. He is/was living in Heilongjiang Province, which is too cold for me to even travel there (I go to China only during fall or winter). I don't think the address is where he lives though. Made up people often live in cold places. Just look at Santa. Matthew the two time scammer tag troll you paid trying to make you look like the victim in all of this is not going to work out too well. It would be best to assist in cleaning up your first mess (bitcoinica and its "hack") before you make a new project. I'm pragmatic - I want to maximize my value for the community. Unfortunately there's really nothing much I can do to accelerate Bitcoinica's liquidation. I wasn't even a shareholder or creditor (so I can't sue them for compensation or anything). So instead of hoping for the best with something I really don't have the capacity to do, I'm thinking of doing something that's 1) good for Bitcoin and 2) not requiring much trust. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: zhoutong on April 23, 2013, 12:56:01 PM Lesson for aspiring Bitcoin scammers: When caught red-handed (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=95738.0), just make up bizarre fairytales with shakespearean characters and amazing coincidences. You'll get a free pass and will be praised by the community. It's a scam made up (fairly successfully) by AurumXchange. Look at who has the money right now: AurumXchange has my $40K and Mt. Gox has Bitcoinica creditors' over $2 million worth of Bitcoins. (I'm not saying Mt. Gox is wrong or anything. It's merely a fact.) I have nothing (and 5000 BTC LESS in my pocket). Thank you for your sarcasm. I believe the free pass and praise will be more valuable if you identify the real scammer correctly. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: meowmeowbrowncow on April 23, 2013, 01:02:17 PM Yeah, zhoutong isn't a bad guy. Maybe a few holes in the original code, then followed up by new ownership that were more careless and - boom - shit storm. Still, zhoutong made a valuable contribution to the bitcoin community with good intentions. welcome back. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: zhoutong on April 23, 2013, 01:06:22 PM Yeah, zhoutong isn't a bad guy. Maybe a few holes in the original code, then followed up by new ownership that were more careless and - boom - shit storm. Still, zhoutong made a valuable contribution to the bitcoin community with good intentions. welcome back. The code may be bad (a lot better now), but that's not the direct cause of the hacks. The infrastructure is a bigger problem. As I was the only guy building infrastructure, I will take the responsibility. Objectives for my next project: - Test code ratio: 1.5 : 1 - LOC/M: 5-6 - Leave infrastructure to a more experienced sysadmin/security professional that I personally know Thanks for the trust and support! Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: zhoutong on April 23, 2013, 01:09:21 PM Lesson for aspiring Bitcoin scammers: When caught red-handed (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=95738.0), just make up bizarre fairytales with shakespearean characters and amazing coincidences. You'll get a free pass and will be praised by the community. It's a scam made up (fairly successfully) by AurumXchange. Look at who has the money right now: AurumXchange has my $40K and Mt. Gox has Bitcoinica creditors' over $2 million worth of Bitcoins. (I'm not saying Mt. Gox is wrong or anything. It's merely a fact.) I have nothing (and 5000 BTC LESS in my pocket). Thank you for your sarcasm. I believe the free pass and praise will be more valuable if you identify the real scammer correctly. If you are the victim who is the real scammer? Your made up friend in china? You answered your own question. If you are not believing me, there's no way I can answer your questions. Both of your posts are phrased similar to: "Is Goat the hacker? Or is Goat too afraid to admit it?" CJH is a real person. I shopped at his Taobao store before. He hacked Bitcoinica and admitted it and returned majority of the funds. I don't think he's living with any gains from the hack now. But he can no longer be contacted regardless. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: greyhawk on April 23, 2013, 01:33:32 PM I hope he used violins.
Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: zhoutong on April 23, 2013, 01:40:17 PM Lesson for aspiring Bitcoin scammers: When caught red-handed (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=95738.0), just make up bizarre fairytales with shakespearean characters and amazing coincidences. You'll get a free pass and will be praised by the community. It's a scam made up (fairly successfully) by AurumXchange. Look at who has the money right now: AurumXchange has my $40K and Mt. Gox has Bitcoinica creditors' over $2 million worth of Bitcoins. (I'm not saying Mt. Gox is wrong or anything. It's merely a fact.) I have nothing (and 5000 BTC LESS in my pocket). Thank you for your sarcasm. I believe the free pass and praise will be more valuable if you identify the real scammer correctly. If you are the victim who is the real scammer? Your made up friend in china? You answered your own question. If you are not believing me, there's no way I can answer your questions. Both of your posts are phrased similar to: "Is Goat the hacker? Or is Goat too afraid to admit it?" CJH is a real person. I shopped at his Taobao store before. He hacked Bitcoinica and admitted it and returned majority of the funds. I don't think he's living with any gains from the hack now. But he can no longer be contacted regardless. How did your friend get your password? Did he hack you or use vilonce? Or did you give it to him? The password was heavily re-used. He could easy find out if he used plain text password in any of his websites. EDIT: It seems that you have almost zero knowledge for the entire incident. I'm back in this forum to contribute, not arguing things that were already clarified long ago. If you really have that many questions to ask, please email bitcointalk@zhoutong.com. I will try my best to entertain your request. Thanks! EDIT 2: CJH is not my friend. I don't have a friend like him. He gave me advice on anti-fraud payment systems on QQ and I paid him. He wouldn't help out of friendship. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: bitcoinminer on April 23, 2013, 02:08:41 PM I think your next project should be investing. Take in funds, which go into a completely opaque investment, and promise astronomical returns, and use new investments to pay out the old investors.
That Charles Ponzi really had a good thing going for awhile. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: 001sonkit on April 23, 2013, 02:21:21 PM Welcome back Ryan. Thou haven't touch upon much with Bitcoinica or others and havent heard much about you by the time i started using Bitcoin. But at least, i got my domain from you. :)
Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: greyhawk on April 23, 2013, 02:37:15 PM I think your next project should be investing. Take in funds, which go into a completely opaque investment, and promise astronomical returns, and use new investments to pay out the old investors. That Charles Ponzi really had a good thing going for awhile. Me personally, I can't wait for the ZhouMiner 3000. I can see the taglines already: - "It runs fast like zhou when he found noone believed his fairy tale." - "Delivers bitcoins to your pockets quicker than a hacked exchange." Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: bitcoinminer on April 23, 2013, 02:44:40 PM I think your next project should be investing. Take in funds, which go into a completely opaque investment, and promise astronomical returns, and use new investments to pay out the old investors. That Charles Ponzi really had a good thing going for awhile. Me personally, I can't wait for the ZhouMiner 3000. I can see the taglines already: - "It runs fast like zhou when he found noone believed his fairy tale." - "Delivers bitcoins to your pockets quicker than a hacked exchange." Trade your bitcoins in for FREE LESSONS in how to tell if something is "Too good to be true!" Title: Re: I'm back! Decentralized markets Post by: mobile4ever on April 23, 2013, 02:55:28 PM I don't really have any clear ideas at the moment, but I'll be more than happy to build a killer app for Bitcoin from stratch. Welcome back! If you know PHP, this would be a "killer app" for the world: https://bitcoinstarter.com/projects/54 I will PM you anyway. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Pangia on April 23, 2013, 03:08:35 PM ZT, how do u feel about the funder of bitcoinica is now a funder of coinlab? I have nothing but gratefulness for Tihan. Regardless of the result, he literally changed my life. I wouldn't ever call myself an entrepreneur without his support. For the CoinLab thing, I really have no comment at the moment. I didn't follow this company very closely. I'm 18 years old. I personally hold less than 100 BTC and I have given my family a 100 BTC gold-plated bar plus 28 Casascius Series I coins (so technically no longer mine). I have sold the 1000 BTC during the recent price spike for some investment in a new company (unrelated to Bitcoin or domains). Another (minor) reason was that I felt that Bitcoin was overpriced. I know very little about you, but I have read all of your responses in the thread and I can say with the utmost certainty that you are NOT 18 years of age. With that said, if you're lying about that simple fact, then I have significant doubts about everything else you're saying. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: John (John K.) on April 23, 2013, 03:11:19 PM ZT, how do u feel about the funder of bitcoinica is now a funder of coinlab? I have nothing but gratefulness for Tihan. Regardless of the result, he literally changed my life. I wouldn't ever call myself an entrepreneur without his support. For the CoinLab thing, I really have no comment at the moment. I didn't follow this company very closely. I'm 18 years old. I personally hold less than 100 BTC and I have given my family a 100 BTC gold-plated bar plus 28 Casascius Series I coins (so technically no longer mine). I have sold the 1000 BTC during the recent price spike for some investment in a new company (unrelated to Bitcoin or domains). Another (minor) reason was that I felt that Bitcoin was overpriced. I know very little about you, but I have read all of your responses in the thread and I can say with the utmost certainty that you are NOT 18 years of age. With that said, if you're lying about that simple fact, then I have significant doubts about everything else you're saying. Hey, sometimes the age is not that obvious. You never know what you're talking to over the Internet. ;) That said, welcome back Ryan. It's been so long since your hiatus from here. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: oakpacific on April 23, 2013, 03:26:33 PM Let me say a few things, Zhou Tong. I don't know if Bitcoinica was properly registered and where, but if it was, then CJH should be a member of the company and we should be able to see his name on some documents, or otherwise he shouldn't get access to the password, which is the company's assets, right? If you are not careful with that, then you have to prepare for the consequences, which is what you're experiencing now:you are unable to prove your innocence. For another, providing that you told the truth about the hacking incident, you were still being irresponsible for not properly storing the company's funds in cold wallets.
Whatever maybe the case, try to stay low key, your return will not be something worth celebrating about as many people, especially victims of the hacking incident, will remain suspicious about you. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: zhoutong on April 23, 2013, 03:35:07 PM Let me say a few things, Zhou Tong. I don't know if Bitcoinica was properly registered and where, but if it was, then CJH should be a member of the company and we should be able to see his name on some documents, or otherwise he shouldn't get access to the password, which is the company's assets, right? If you are not careful with that, then you have to prepare for the consequences, which is what you're experiencing now:you are unable to prove your innocence. For another, providing that you told the truth about the hacking incident, you were still being irresponsible for not properly storing the company's funds in cold wallets. Whatever maybe the case, try to stay low key, your return will not be something worth celebrating about as many people, especially victims of the hacking incident, will remain suspicious about you. The "password" to the LastPass account was found in the source code leaked by genjix. I didn't set it or leak the source code. I have only heard of "innocent until proven guilty", not the other way round. Plus, how can innocence ever be proven? I can get a police clearance tomorrow, if you like. EDIT: Clearly CJH is an outsider. Even I am not the member of the company. I sold Bitcoinica in 2011. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: oakpacific on April 23, 2013, 03:41:48 PM Let me say a few things, Zhou Tong. I don't know if Bitcoinica was properly registered and where, but if it was, then CJH should be a member of the company and we should be able to see his name on some documents, or otherwise he shouldn't get access to the password, which is the company's assets, right? If you are not careful with that, then you have to prepare for the consequences, which is what you're experiencing now:you are unable to prove your innocence. For another, providing that you told the truth about the hacking incident, you were still being irresponsible for not properly storing the company's funds in cold wallets. Whatever maybe the case, try to stay low key, your return will not be something worth celebrating about as many people, especially victims of the hacking incident, will remain suspicious about you. The "password" to the LastPass account was found in the source code leaked by genjix. I didn't set it or leak the source code. I have only heard of "innocent until proven guilty", not the other way round. Plus, how can innocence ever be proven? I can get a police clearance tomorrow, if you like. EDIT: Clearly CJH is an outsider. Even I am not the member of the company. I sold Bitcoinica in 2011. "Innocent until proven guilty" only works when you are facing a possible prosecution, doesn't apply when you're trying to get people's trust for your business. Okay you may not give him the password, but how did you figure out it was him who did the hack? Did you have any evidence against him? Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Kaiji on April 23, 2013, 03:43:42 PM For the newcomers benefit, can someone give a brief account on who zhou tong is? And what was his role in the bitcoinica fiasco.
Thanks in advance. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: zhoutong on April 23, 2013, 03:50:49 PM Let me say a few things, Zhou Tong. I don't know if Bitcoinica was properly registered and where, but if it was, then CJH should be a member of the company and we should be able to see his name on some documents, or otherwise he shouldn't get access to the password, which is the company's assets, right? If you are not careful with that, then you have to prepare for the consequences, which is what you're experiencing now:you are unable to prove your innocence. For another, providing that you told the truth about the hacking incident, you were still being irresponsible for not properly storing the company's funds in cold wallets. Whatever maybe the case, try to stay low key, your return will not be something worth celebrating about as many people, especially victims of the hacking incident, will remain suspicious about you. The "password" to the LastPass account was found in the source code leaked by genjix. I didn't set it or leak the source code. I have only heard of "innocent until proven guilty", not the other way round. Plus, how can innocence ever be proven? I can get a police clearance tomorrow, if you like. EDIT: Clearly CJH is an outsider. Even I am not the member of the company. I sold Bitcoinica in 2011. "Innocent until proven guilty" only works when you are facing a possible prosecution, doesn't apply when you're trying to get people's trust for your business. Okay you may not give him the password, but how did you figure out it was him who did the hack? Did you have any evidence against him? I was not asking for trust. I will build something that requires little trust (such as open source app, for example). There was a credit card of Bitcoinica's accountant in the LastPass account used to pay some bills. CJH used that card to purchase stuff on Amazon shipped to a freight forwarder with his real name. The confirmation email was sent to the sock puppet email account. I explained it 11 months ago and no one read. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: oakpacific on April 23, 2013, 04:03:08 PM Let me say a few things, Zhou Tong. I don't know if Bitcoinica was properly registered and where, but if it was, then CJH should be a member of the company and we should be able to see his name on some documents, or otherwise he shouldn't get access to the password, which is the company's assets, right? If you are not careful with that, then you have to prepare for the consequences, which is what you're experiencing now:you are unable to prove your innocence. For another, providing that you told the truth about the hacking incident, you were still being irresponsible for not properly storing the company's funds in cold wallets. Whatever maybe the case, try to stay low key, your return will not be something worth celebrating about as many people, especially victims of the hacking incident, will remain suspicious about you. The "password" to the LastPass account was found in the source code leaked by genjix. I didn't set it or leak the source code. I have only heard of "innocent until proven guilty", not the other way round. Plus, how can innocence ever be proven? I can get a police clearance tomorrow, if you like. EDIT: Clearly CJH is an outsider. Even I am not the member of the company. I sold Bitcoinica in 2011. "Innocent until proven guilty" only works when you are facing a possible prosecution, doesn't apply when you're trying to get people's trust for your business. Okay you may not give him the password, but how did you figure out it was him who did the hack? Did you have any evidence against him? I was not asking for trust. I will build something that requires little trust (such as open source app, for example). There was a credit card of Bitcoinica's accountant in the LastPass account used to pay some bills. CJH used that card to purchase stuff on Amazon shipped to a freight forwarder with his real name. The confirmation email was sent to the sock puppet email account. I explained it 11 months ago and no one read. That maybe exactly where the problem is? So did the corporation give all this information to you and ask you, a non-member to help with the investigation, or you just got access to the E-mail account? Sounds like quite a bit of mixup of personal/business affairs here. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Transisto on April 23, 2013, 04:14:01 PM Lesson for aspiring Bitcoin scammers: When caught red-handed (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=95738.0), just make up bizarre fairytales with shakespearean characters and amazing coincidences. You'll get a free pass and will be praised by the community. It's a scam made up (fairly successfully) by AurumXchange. Look at who has the money right now: AurumXchange has my $40K and Mt. Gox has Bitcoinica creditors' over $2 million worth of Bitcoins. (I'm not saying Mt. Gox is wrong or anything. It's merely a fact.) I have nothing (and 5000 BTC LESS in my pocket). Thank you for your sarcasm. I believe the free pass and praise will be more valuable if you identify the real scammer correctly. If you are the victim who is the real scammer? Your made up friend in china? You answered your own question. If you are not believing me, there's no way I can answer your questions. Both of your posts are phrased similar to: "Is Goat the hacker? Or is Goat too afraid to admit it?" CJH is a real person. I shopped at his Taobao store before. He hacked Bitcoinica and admitted it and returned majority of the funds. I don't think he's living with any gains from the hack now. But he can no longer be contacted regardless. How did your friend get your password? Did he hack you or use vilonce? Or did you give it to him? The password was heavily re-used. He could easy find out if he used plain text password in any of his websites. EDIT: It seems that you have almost zero knowledge for the entire incident. I'm back in this forum to contribute, not arguing things that were already clarified long ago. If you really have that many questions to ask, please email bitcointalk@zhoutong.com. I will try my best to entertain your request. Thanks! EDIT 2: CJH is not my friend. I don't have a friend like him. He gave me advice on anti-fraud payment systems on QQ and I paid him. He wouldn't help out of friendship. What website does he have ? This was the email you were using regularly to exchange with peoples, How would some bogus "using plain text password in any of *? websites." give him access to it ? Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Pangia on April 23, 2013, 04:36:17 PM ZT, how do u feel about the funder of bitcoinica is now a funder of coinlab? I have nothing but gratefulness for Tihan. Regardless of the result, he literally changed my life. I wouldn't ever call myself an entrepreneur without his support. For the CoinLab thing, I really have no comment at the moment. I didn't follow this company very closely. I'm 18 years old. I personally hold less than 100 BTC and I have given my family a 100 BTC gold-plated bar plus 28 Casascius Series I coins (so technically no longer mine). I have sold the 1000 BTC during the recent price spike for some investment in a new company (unrelated to Bitcoin or domains). Another (minor) reason was that I felt that Bitcoin was overpriced. I know very little about you, but I have read all of your responses in the thread and I can say with the utmost certainty that you are NOT 18 years of age. With that said, if you're lying about that simple fact, then I have significant doubts about everything else you're saying. Lurk more. That is about the only true thing he has said. Hi Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย, This person (Zhou Tong) isn't 18. Without going into details, in my profession (for the past 20 years) I have interviewed hundreds of individuals. One of the things that we look for is a slight inconsistency in their story which we then go after it. Sometimes the inconsistency is due to something innocent (hiding an affair, minor theft) relative to what we're looking into. But more often than not, it's a slip-up on their part because they're trying to hide something else (what we're actually interested in). Once we get to that "something else", then we widen the hole in their story. Further inconsistencies are developed by them to explain away the initial lie which leads to the hole in their story becoming wider and wider, with the final outcome either being them admitting to what occurred or requesting an attorney since their back is now against the wall with a mountain of lies on top of them. Without know this Zhow Tong personally, I would say that he/she is "back" in an effort to perpetrate some new type of fraud. His/her intent is to size up the audience and then build confidence, hence the elaborate explanations. He/she will ultimately gain the trust of enough people to be able to pull one more scam. Caveat emptor Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Matthew N. Wright on April 23, 2013, 04:38:12 PM This person (Zhou Tong) isn't 18. Without going into details, .. ..or evidence. Amirite?Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Pangia on April 23, 2013, 04:41:23 PM This person (Zhou Tong) isn't 18. Without going into details, .. ..or evidence. Amirite?Without going into details -- was a new sentence and referred to my profession. In regards to his/her age actually being 18, I'm not the one that should be providing evidence, he/she (Zhou Tong) should be proving it. Starting with proving who they are and everything else about them. He/she obviously wants something now, otherwise they wouldn't be so bent on attempting to regain the trust of this board with their elaborate explanations. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Matthew N. Wright on April 23, 2013, 04:43:05 PM he/she (Zhou Tong) should be proving it. Couldn't agree more..if it had something to do with anything. What does his age have to do with anything though? Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: greyhawk on April 23, 2013, 04:43:37 PM Without know this Zhow Tong personally, I would say that he/she is "back" in an effort to perpetrate some new type of fraud. His/her intent is to size up the audience and then build confidence, hence the elaborate explanations. He/she will ultimately gain the trust of enough people to be able to pull one more scam. We know that. Everyone in this thread knows that. Well at least the one's talking about imaginary relic hunters. Doesn't make him "not 18". That's about the most uninteresting part of all this. It's like trying to squeeze through a needlepin-pricky hole in his story while the rest of us are happily slaloming with a Humvee through the giant gaping maws in the story while swilling beer, singing rowdy songs and baring our asses at all the ladies. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Pangia on April 23, 2013, 04:44:59 PM Age is a minor issue. But if it's a lie (which I believe it is), then what else is a lie? If you're going to lie about something so simple, then what about the complicated/elaborate things that you're speaking of?
Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Matthew N. Wright on April 23, 2013, 04:46:25 PM Age is a minor issue. But if it's a lie (which I believe it is), then what else is a lie? If you're going to lie about something so simple, then what about the complicated/elaborate things that you're speaking of? Welcome to bitcointalk, you'll fit right in here. http://fc01.deviantart.net/fs23/f/2008/005/7/f/_foilnoid__by_Helen_Baq.gif Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Pangia on April 23, 2013, 04:46:55 PM Without know this Zhow Tong personally, I would say that he/she is "back" in an effort to perpetrate some new type of fraud. His/her intent is to size up the audience and then build confidence, hence the elaborate explanations. He/she will ultimately gain the trust of enough people to be able to pull one more scam. We know that. Everyone in this thread knows that. Well at least the one's talking about imaginary relic hunters. Doesn't make him "not 18". That's about the most uninteresting part of all this. It's like trying to squeeze through a needlepin-pricky hole in his story while the rest of us are happily slaloming with a Humvee through the giant gaping maws in the story while swilling beer, singing rowdy songs and baring our asses at all the ladies. Hi Greyhawk, Sorry, I don't know much about this person. Catching up on things now. But that was a quick lie (age being 18) that I caught, which led me to doubt everything else he was writing about. Now learning that this person is a complete scammer. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: kgo on April 23, 2013, 04:51:21 PM Yeah, zhoutong isn't a bad guy. Maybe a few holes in the original code, then followed up by new ownership that were more careless and - boom - shit storm. Still, zhoutong made a valuable contribution to the bitcoin community with good intentions. welcome back. Once evidence started pointing towards zhou, zhou himself said that an associate of zhou's stole the password and the bitcoins. He provided this "friend's" name. And claimed the friend was involved in organized crime and also a hunter of ancient antiquities and relics. Then after outing the mysterious relic hunter, he can't or won't provide any more details about the 'real' thief's identity that would allow authorities to track him down. I don't know about you, but I don't think it's wise to rat out a multi-millionaire organized criminal. Such a person would be likely to do something to shut you up. Not like bitcoiners who get scammed and complain and do nothing. If you actually believe this ridiculous story, zhou knows the identity of the bitcoinia thief, inadvertently provided him with enough info to steal the passwords, and isn't doing anything to assist in catching the thief. And if you don't, then zhou is like OJ Simpson, talking about the 'real' thief to deflect blame away from himself. Either way, I wouldn't trust him. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Pangia on April 23, 2013, 04:54:25 PM Yeah, zhoutong isn't a bad guy. Maybe a few holes in the original code, then followed up by new ownership that were more careless and - boom - shit storm. Still, zhoutong made a valuable contribution to the bitcoin community with good intentions. welcome back. Once evidence started pointing towards zhou, zhou himself said that an associate of zhou's stole the password and the bitcoins. He provided this "friend's" name. And claimed the friend was involved in organized crime and also a hunter of ancient antiquities and relics. Then after outing the mysterious relic hunter, he can't or won't provide any more details about the 'real' thief's identity that would allow authorities to track him down. I don't know about you, but I don't think it's wise to rat out a multi-millionaire organized criminal. Such a person would be likely to do something to shut you up. Not like bitcoiners who get scammed and complain and do nothing. If you actually believe this ridiculous story, zhou knows the identity of the bitcoinia thief, inadvertently provided him with enough info to steal the passwords, and isn't doing anything to assist in catching the thief. And if you don't, then zhou is like OJ Simpson, talking about the 'real' thief to deflect blame away from himself. Either way, I wouldn't trust him. WOW! Classic con-man. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: elux on April 23, 2013, 05:10:02 PM Nothing really has changed, except the soaring prices (it doesn't have a lot to do with me other than seeing my out-of-pocket 5,000 BTC personal compensation is valued at >$1 million at peak, that was over 80% of my entire Bitcoin savings and I didn't purchase more after the incident). Bitcoinica LP is still not liquidated with zero progress of the fund return. And nothing of value was lost, right? :) First: Are you up for a /r/bitcoin IAMA? Regarding Bitcoinica: What, if anything, would you have done differently? (Refresher: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2973301) In your opinion, what happened to Bitcoinica? Are you a party in the civil litigation against Bitcoinica? What is your opinion on the (recent) death of instawallet? What is your opinion of the Bitcoin Consultancy trio? How is your registrar business doing? How is your sleep? Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: bbit on April 23, 2013, 05:18:55 PM Welcome back! lol
Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Alex Zee on April 23, 2013, 05:25:58 PM I know very little about you, but I have read all of your responses in the thread and I can say with the utmost certainty that you are NOT 18 years of age. With that said, if you're lying about that simple fact, then I have significant doubts about everything else you're saying. My thoughts exactly. He can't be 18, that's ridiculous. And if I remember correctly he was "18" about 1.5 years ago when I first heard about Bitcoinica, and already I had my doubts about his age. So he should update his legend and suddenly grow up to at least 19. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Vod on April 23, 2013, 05:35:00 PM For those that don't want to read everything - here is a short summary.
Zhou Tong used to run bitcoinica. Using inside information, he stole bitcoins at least two times from that company. The last theft was traced directly back to him. With no way to defend himself, he made up a fictional character that NO PERSON ever met, or spoke to, other than Zhou Tong himself. He blamed everything on this other person, therefore making himself look innocent. Of course, ZERO evidence was ever presented that this person is real. We're now told this imaginary person cannot be contacted - so Zhou hopes we will all just forget about his theft. He still owes the community 5,000 btc. Religious (aka gullible) people may believe his story, but the rest of us know he is a thief. WHY NO SCAMMER TAG? He donated a lot of money to the forum. To read the entire story: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=95738.0 Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Alex Zee on April 23, 2013, 05:38:16 PM I guess, he spent all what he scammed and now wants more :)
Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: allten on April 23, 2013, 05:50:34 PM Welcome back Zhou.
Look forward to seeing your contributions. I will raise hell though if you are ever in a position of receiving funds. But then again, I'm sure you know better and are or would be using another name and invented identity to run a "bitcon" business Good Luck! I really do hope the best for you. I'll give you a second chance on everything except trust. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: bbit on April 23, 2013, 05:54:27 PM For those that don't want to read everything - here is a short summary. Zhou Tong used to run bitcoinica. Using inside information, he stole bitcoins at least two times from that company. The last theft was traced directly back to him. With no way to defend himself, he made up a fictional character that NO PERSON ever met, or spoke to, other than Zhou Tong himself. He blamed everything on this other person, therefore making himself look innocent. Of course, ZERO evidence was ever presented that this person is real. We're now told this imaginary person cannot be contacted - so Zhou hopes we will all just forget about his theft. He still owes the community 5,000 btc. Religious (aka gullible) people may believe his story, but the rest of us know he is a thief. WHY NO SCAMMER TAG? He donated a lot of money to the forum. To read the entire story: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=95738.0 Good point. I wonder why no tag has been given? Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Nemesis on April 23, 2013, 06:01:58 PM Zhoutong, where is your collector friend? ::)
You better stay low. Your name is already tainted. We're not stupid. Good luck with the rest of your life, you need it Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: acoindr on April 23, 2013, 06:02:10 PM Welcom back Zhou!
I'm an outsider that can only speculate, but my personal opinion is you are not a scammer. That's my own opinion. I do think you should be open to another financial services platform. You're clearly good at it and I see a way it can help the community. People would be rightfully wary of any Bitcoinica 2 from you and keep only minimum balances in their accounts. That's a healthy attitude with Bitcoin, and people need to be trained that way. I've often said people should not keep more funds or coins in any online Bitcoin account than they are prepared to lose completely. If people followed that advice the impact of things like Bitcoinica and mybitcoin.com would not be so great. Bitcoin is still small so developing healthy practices now is better in the long run. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: proudhon on April 23, 2013, 06:32:35 PM This thread just reminded me that I forgot to send in my info for the liquidation claims process. I think the deadline was sometime in January. Oops. But, the odds of getting those 150BTC back, or anything remotely close to that amount, seemed, and still seemed, so remote that it just wasn't on my mind. I guess somebody's got them, will get them, so you're welcome zou, or Amir, or liquidators, or whoever ends up with them. I've just been counting that as the cost of learning the value of offline security.
Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Maged on April 23, 2013, 10:13:46 PM I know very little about you, but I have read all of your responses in the thread and I can say with the utmost certainty that you are NOT 18 years of age. With that said, if you're lying about that simple fact, then I have significant doubts about everything else you're saying. My thoughts exactly. He can't be 18, that's ridiculous. And if I remember correctly he was "18" about 1.5 years ago when I first heard about Bitcoinica, and already I had my doubts about his age. So he should update his legend and suddenly grow up to at least 19. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Alex Zee on April 23, 2013, 10:33:53 PM Seems like it, right? But no, he's still 18 for a few more months. Well, that's maybe what it says on his profile, but he sure sounds like an adult. If he worked for Microsoft, they probably wouldn't hire a 17-years old, would they? And for pictures he could use his son. Did anybody actually met him in person? Melbourne is a big city, there should be plenty of bitcoiners there. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Pangia on April 23, 2013, 10:36:29 PM I know very little about you, but I have read all of your responses in the thread and I can say with the utmost certainty that you are NOT 18 years of age. With that said, if you're lying about that simple fact, then I have significant doubts about everything else you're saying. My thoughts exactly. He can't be 18, that's ridiculous. And if I remember correctly he was "18" about 1.5 years ago when I first heard about Bitcoinica, and already I had my doubts about his age. So he should update his legend and suddenly grow up to at least 19. So you know for a fact what his real date of birth is? Please, if you do in fact know that, then post it here along with proof. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: zhoutong on April 23, 2013, 10:59:13 PM Seems like it, right? But no, he's still 18 for a few more months. Well, that's maybe what it says on his profile, but he sure sounds like an adult. If he worked for Microsoft, they probably wouldn't hire a 17-years old, would they? And for pictures he could use his son. Did anybody actually met him in person? Melbourne is a big city, there should be plenty of bitcoiners there. That's a lie told by AurumXchange. I've never worked for Microsoft. (I didn't even use any Microsoft product at that time.) Very few people have met me so far, but I'm going to be more open as part of the "comeback". I'll try to attend as many Bitcoiner events as possible. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: zhoutong on April 23, 2013, 11:01:30 PM Welcome back Zhou. Look forward to seeing your contributions. I will raise hell though if you are ever in a position of receiving funds. But then again, I'm sure you know better and are or would be using another name and invented identity to run a "bitcon" business Good Luck! I really do hope the best for you. I'll give you a second chance on everything except trust. Thanks. I have been using my real name to do business for my whole life and it's really inconvenient to invent a new identity. So I won't do it. Trust is not a problem. If I make something that accepts deposits I will most likely impose a small "balance upper limit" (e.g. 10 BTC) that's sufficient to enjoy the services. Since it won't be another exchange, there should be no reason to leave a large amount of balance for a long period of time. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Minor Miner on April 23, 2013, 11:03:35 PM Seems like it, right? But no, he's still 18 for a few more months. Well, that's maybe what it says on his profile, but he sure sounds like an adult. If he worked for Microsoft, they probably wouldn't hire a 17-years old, would they? And for pictures he could use his son.Did anybody actually met him in person? Melbourne is a big city, there should be plenty of bitcoiners there. Very few people have met me so far, but I'm going to be more open as part of the "comeback". I'll try to attend as many Bitcoiner events as possible. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Matthew N. Wright on April 23, 2013, 11:06:38 PM Seems like it, right? But no, he's still 18 for a few more months. Well, that's maybe what it says on his profile, but he sure sounds like an adult. If he worked for Microsoft, they probably wouldn't hire a 17-years old, would they? And for pictures he could use his son.Did anybody actually met him in person? Melbourne is a big city, there should be plenty of bitcoiners there. Very few people have met me so far, but I'm going to be more open as part of the "comeback". I'll try to attend as many Bitcoiner events as possible. 14+ is allowed to fly unaccompanied internationally. Some airlines might require a signed waiver from a parent. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: flower1024 on April 23, 2013, 11:07:46 PM Welcome Back
Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Alex Zee on April 23, 2013, 11:08:03 PM Very few people have met me so far, but I'm going to be more open as part of the "comeback". I'll try to attend as many Bitcoiner events as possible. That's actually quite simple. We've seen pictures, how about you do a Q&A session on Ustream now? Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Maged on April 23, 2013, 11:10:06 PM Seems like it, right? But no, he's still 18 for a few more months. Well, that's maybe what it says on his profile, but he sure sounds like an adult. If he worked for Microsoft, they probably wouldn't hire a 17-years old, would they? And for pictures he could use his son. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Vod on April 23, 2013, 11:14:33 PM Very few people have met me so far, but I'm going to be more open as part of the "comeback". I'll try to attend as many Bitcoiner events as possible. Just don't believe for a second that one year has erased the memories of your theft. Once we have you in person we will be looking to collect the rest that you owe us. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: BTC Books on April 23, 2013, 11:37:13 PM Very few people have met me so far Name one. Just one on this forum who has any level of trust, and is known face-to-face by other users. One. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: repentance on April 23, 2013, 11:44:32 PM I know very little about you, but I have read all of your responses in the thread and I can say with the utmost certainty that you are NOT 18 years of age. With that said, if you're lying about that simple fact, then I have significant doubts about everything else you're saying. Unless he has excellent counterfeit ID, he's 18. He was able to incorporate NameTerrific as a company on his 18th birthday and that requires producing valid ID here. Quote Saw that you posted a plane ticket from when you were 16? or 17? Are minors allowed to fly internationally by themselves and go through singapore and aussie customs? Yes. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: repentance on April 23, 2013, 11:49:15 PM Let me say a few things, Zhou Tong. I don't know if Bitcoinica was properly registered and where, but if it was, then CJH should be a member of the company and we should be able to see his name on some documents, or otherwise he shouldn't get access to the password, which is the company's assets, right? If you are not careful with that, then you have to prepare for the consequences, which is what you're experiencing now:you are unable to prove your innocence. For another, providing that you told the truth about the hacking incident, you were still being irresponsible for not properly storing the company's funds in cold wallets. Whatever maybe the case, try to stay low key, your return will not be something worth celebrating about as many people, especially victims of the hacking incident, will remain suspicious about you. Read the old thread in which Zhou trots out the Chinese relic collector story and how that person just happened to have access to Zhou's password. It's pretty amusing. Quote from: zhoutong I explained it 11 months ago and no one read. Plenty of people read it. It sounded like a crock of shit then and it still sounds like a crock of shit now. BTW, why was your name even on the proposed confidential settlement agreement if you were merely a Bitcoinica employee at the time that proposal was made. Why did Jesse Powell post here that you and Tihan had agreed to that proposal when your agreement should have been utterly irrelevant if you had no official role in Bitcoinica? Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: zhoutong on April 23, 2013, 11:56:00 PM Let me say a few things, Zhou Tong. I don't know if Bitcoinica was properly registered and where, but if it was, then CJH should be a member of the company and we should be able to see his name on some documents, or otherwise he shouldn't get access to the password, which is the company's assets, right? If you are not careful with that, then you have to prepare for the consequences, which is what you're experiencing now:you are unable to prove your innocence. For another, providing that you told the truth about the hacking incident, you were still being irresponsible for not properly storing the company's funds in cold wallets. Whatever maybe the case, try to stay low key, your return will not be something worth celebrating about as many people, especially victims of the hacking incident, will remain suspicious about you. Read the old thread in which Zhou trots out the Chinese relic collector story and how that person just happened to have access to Zhou's password. It's pretty amusing. Quote from: zhoutong I explained it 11 months ago and no one read. Plenty of people read it. It sounded like a crock of shit then and it still sounds like a crock of shit now. No. It was a confusion. The "password" in the reply to Goat referred to the password of the sock puppet account. It had nothing to do with Bitcoinica. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: zhoutong on April 23, 2013, 11:58:02 PM I know very little about you, but I have read all of your responses in the thread and I can say with the utmost certainty that you are NOT 18 years of age. With that said, if you're lying about that simple fact, then I have significant doubts about everything else you're saying. Unless he has excellent counterfeit ID, he's 18. He was able to incorporate NameTerrific as a company on his 18th birthday and that requires producing valid ID here. I didn't produce ID when I incorporate the company. ASIC doesn't require that nowadays. But directorship is always linked to my credit file, so there's no benefit to lie. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: BTC Books on April 24, 2013, 12:05:30 AM Very few people have met me so far Name one. Just one on this forum who has any level of trust, and is known face-to-face by other users. One. Wondering... Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Pangia on April 24, 2013, 12:08:40 AM I know very little about you, but I have read all of your responses in the thread and I can say with the utmost certainty that you are NOT 18 years of age. With that said, if you're lying about that simple fact, then I have significant doubts about everything else you're saying. Unless he has excellent counterfeit ID, he's 18. He was able to incorporate NameTerrific as a company on his 18th birthday and that requires producing valid ID here. Quote Saw that you posted a plane ticket from when you were 16? or 17? Are minors allowed to fly internationally by themselves and go through singapore and aussie customs? Yes. More interesting is that fact that the stamps are on PAGE 20 of his alleged passport. That's a heck of a lot of traveling for someone under 18. And at 17, he's also a bronz level frequent flyer. find 1 tiny lie and everything else can be unraveled. It's amazing that some of you folks actually believe this perps story. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: zhoutong on April 24, 2013, 12:10:39 AM I know very little about you, but I have read all of your responses in the thread and I can say with the utmost certainty that you are NOT 18 years of age. With that said, if you're lying about that simple fact, then I have significant doubts about everything else you're saying. Unless he has excellent counterfeit ID, he's 18. He was able to incorporate NameTerrific as a company on his 18th birthday and that requires producing valid ID here. Quote Saw that you posted a plane ticket from when you were 16? or 17? Are minors allowed to fly internationally by themselves and go through singapore and aussie customs? Yes. More interesting is that fact that the stamps are on PAGE 20 of his alleged passport. That's a heck of a lot of traveling for someone under 18. It's amazing that some of you folks actually believe this perps story. Chinese ports stamp near the visa page. Other ports stamp near other stamps. There are a few empty pages before Page 20. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Matthew N. Wright on April 24, 2013, 12:11:54 AM More interesting is that fact that the stamps are on PAGE 20 of his alleged passport. That's a heck of a lot of traveling for someone under 18. Besides admitting to constantly travelling, even my passport stamps are randomly placed by Korean and Japanese immigration when I leave and come back. They usually put my VISA stickers right smack dab in the middle of a few empty pages too. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: jimbobway on April 24, 2013, 12:13:47 AM The code may be bad (a lot better now), but that's not the direct cause of the hacks. The infrastructure is a bigger problem. As I was the only guy building infrastructure, I will take the responsibility. Objectives for my next project: - Test code ratio: 1.5 : 1 - LOC/M: 5-6 - Leave infrastructure to a more experienced sysadmin/security professional that I personally know I don't think you've figured it out yet zhoutong. The problem you have is figuring out who to trust and who to work with. 1.) You chose to work with Bitcoin Consultancy (genjix). FAIL. 2.) One of your partners stole stole your password. You trusted his computer. FAIL. 3.) You prefer the one-man-team where you code and do everything, trusting little to no one. FAIL. 4.) You hosted Bitcoinica in the cloud and trusted them, and put the wallet in the cloud losing tens of thousands of BTCs. FAIL. So in your objectives you need, "Learn who to trust". Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: chunglam on April 24, 2013, 12:17:55 AM Welcome back, Zhou.
Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: zhoutong on April 24, 2013, 12:19:10 AM The code may be bad (a lot better now), but that's not the direct cause of the hacks. The infrastructure is a bigger problem. As I was the only guy building infrastructure, I will take the responsibility. Objectives for my next project: - Test code ratio: 1.5 : 1 - LOC/M: 5-6 - Leave infrastructure to a more experienced sysadmin/security professional that I personally know I don't think you've figured it out yet zhoutong. The problem you have is figuring out who to trust and who to work with. 1.) You chose to work with Bitcoin Consultancy (genjix). FAIL. 2.) One of your partners stole stole your password. You trusted his computer. FAIL. 3.) You prefer the one-man-team where you code and do everything, trusting little to no one. FAIL. 4.) You hosted Bitcoinica in the cloud and trusted them, and put the wallet in the cloud losing tens of thousands of BTCs. FAIL. So in your objectives you need, "Learn who to trust". I didn't choose my partners. I sold Bitcoinica in 2011. I can take only advisory responsibility for anything happened in 2012. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Pangia on April 24, 2013, 12:24:06 AM I know very little about you, but I have read all of your responses in the thread and I can say with the utmost certainty that you are NOT 18 years of age. With that said, if you're lying about that simple fact, then I have significant doubts about everything else you're saying. Unless he has excellent counterfeit ID, he's 18. He was able to incorporate NameTerrific as a company on his 18th birthday and that requires producing valid ID here. Quote Saw that you posted a plane ticket from when you were 16? or 17? Are minors allowed to fly internationally by themselves and go through singapore and aussie customs? Yes. More interesting is that fact that the stamps are on PAGE 20 of his alleged passport. That's a heck of a lot of traveling for someone under 18. It's amazing that some of you folks actually believe this perps story. Chinese ports stamp near the visa page. Other ports stamp near other stamps. There are a few empty pages before Page 20. prove that you're 18. post a nice long youtube video of you speaking about everything that you've spoken about here. You can even hold up your alleged passport and show us that the person on the youtube video is the same person on the passport with the picture. Then you can answer some of the questions that have been posted here on the youtube video. That's easy to do isn't it. You can actually do that right now. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: BTC Books on April 24, 2013, 12:26:53 AM Very few people have met me so far Name one. Just one on this forum who has any level of trust, and is known face-to-face by other users. One. Wondering... Waiting patiently... Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: tvbcof on April 24, 2013, 12:28:47 AM Glad to see you back.
If you are looking for a project, could you build Mt. Gox a matching engine that that works with some modicum of performance? It may or may not be your thing, but someone of the 7 billion people on earth should be able to do something for Christsake! Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Inedible on April 24, 2013, 12:44:09 AM First of all, welcome back.
I still don't know if you're guilty or not because I haven't seen hard evidence either way. My feeling is that you're genuine but maybe I'm a sucker. There's certainly no hard evidence against you and your actions seem like the actions of an honest person. As there's no real way to clear up your past, I guess we'll only be able to tell from your future actions. Let's hope you proceed with caution and in time show yourself to be an upstanding member of the community. Good luck! Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Inedible on April 24, 2013, 12:47:40 AM This person (Zhou Tong) isn't 18. Without going into details, in my profession (for the past 20 years) I have interviewed hundreds of individuals. One of the things that we look for is a slight inconsistency in their story which we then go after it. Sometimes the inconsistency is due to something innocent (hiding an affair, minor theft) relative to what we're looking into. But more often than not, it's a slip-up on their part because they're trying to hide something else (what we're actually interested in). Once we get to that "something else", then we widen the hole in their story. Further inconsistencies are developed by them to explain away the initial lie which leads to the hole in their story becoming wider and wider, with the final outcome either being them admitting to what occurred or requesting an attorney since their back is now against the wall with a mountain of lies on top of them. My understanding is that someone's met him before and he's also posted pictures of ID as proof. That being the case, you might have painted your credibility into a bit of a corner here. For your sake, Zhou Tong had better not turn out to be 18, eh? I mean, it's going to be very hard for him to pretend to be 18 when he attends other Bitcoin meetings... Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Inedible on April 24, 2013, 12:50:39 AM Yeah, zhoutong isn't a bad guy. Maybe a few holes in the original code, then followed up by new ownership that were more careless and - boom - shit storm. Still, zhoutong made a valuable contribution to the bitcoin community with good intentions. welcome back. Once evidence started pointing towards zhou, zhou himself said that an associate of zhou's stole the password and the bitcoins. He provided this "friend's" name. And claimed the friend was involved in organized crime and also a hunter of ancient antiquities and relics. Then after outing the mysterious relic hunter, he can't or won't provide any more details about the 'real' thief's identity that would allow authorities to track him down. I don't know about you, but I don't think it's wise to rat out a multi-millionaire organized criminal. Such a person would be likely to do something to shut you up. Not like bitcoiners who get scammed and complain and do nothing. If you actually believe this ridiculous story, zhou knows the identity of the bitcoinia thief, inadvreallyertently provided him with enough info to steal the passwords, and isn't doing anything to assist in catching the thief. And if you don't, then zhou is like OJ Simpson, talking about the 'real' thief to deflect blame away from himself. Either way, I wouldn't trust him. WOW! Classic con-man. So you've verified all that information before making your conclusion or have you just accepted as fact, information posted on a public forum by a stranger? You use these same analytical skills for your 20yr career? Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Inedible on April 24, 2013, 12:54:16 AM More interesting is that fact that the stamps are on PAGE 20 of his alleged passport. That's a heck of a lot of traveling for someone under 18. And at 17, he's also a bronz level frequent flyer. find 1 tiny lie and everything else can be unraveled. It's amazing that some of you folks actually believe this perps story. Not sure if you travel much but where a passport is stamped is not a guarantee of how much a person has travelled. In some instances (a very low rate), passports are stamped chronologically but more often than not, it's random. I had friends at school (16yrs old) who travelled over 50,000 miles a year so being in a frequent flyer band is barely a basis for anything. Looks like your conclusions are all based on your own beliefs rather than hard fact. Edited: Clarifying flying miles statement. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: repentance on April 24, 2013, 01:00:18 AM Link to the thread in which Zhou introduces the Chinese relic collector as the culprit in the last Bitcoinica hack.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=95795.0 Link to thread in which AurumXchange makes public a connection between the MtGox intrusion and activity on Zhou's account. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=95738.0 Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Pangia on April 24, 2013, 01:02:57 AM Yeah, zhoutong isn't a bad guy. Maybe a few holes in the original code, then followed up by new ownership that were more careless and - boom - shit storm. Still, zhoutong made a valuable contribution to the bitcoin community with good intentions. welcome back. Once evidence started pointing towards zhou, zhou himself said that an associate of zhou's stole the password and the bitcoins. He provided this "friend's" name. And claimed the friend was involved in organized crime and also a hunter of ancient antiquities and relics. Then after outing the mysterious relic hunter, he can't or won't provide any more details about the 'real' thief's identity that would allow authorities to track him down. I don't know about you, but I don't think it's wise to rat out a multi-millionaire organized criminal. Such a person would be likely to do something to shut you up. Not like bitcoiners who get scammed and complain and do nothing. If you actually believe this ridiculous story, zhou knows the identity of the bitcoinia thief, inadvreallyertently provided him with enough info to steal the passwords, and isn't doing anything to assist in catching the thief. And if you don't, then zhou is like OJ Simpson, talking about the 'real' thief to deflect blame away from himself. Either way, I wouldn't trust him. WOW! Classic con-man. So you've verified all that information before making your conclusion or have you just accepted as fact, information posted on a public forum by a stranger? You use these same analytical skills for your 20yr career? My 20 year career has taught me that there are con-men and there are victims. Victims are sometimes reluctant to accept the fact that they are victims or will be victims. On this forum, I'm not the one who has to establish credibility. Instead I'm the one that can question the stories put forward by an individual who has not proven anything that he has espoused thus far. I'm not here to attempt to convince anyone to once again "believe" in me because I'm here with a new project and need the buy-in of forum members. This person re-surfaced after 11 months? WHY? New Project? That must be con-man talk for "New Scam". Wonder if it's a new trading site scam. P.S. -- you're willing to defend this perp without factual evidence to disprove the allegations against him? Guess, Zhou Tong has multiple user names. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Pangia on April 24, 2013, 01:08:30 AM More interesting is that fact that the stamps are on PAGE 20 of his alleged passport. That's a heck of a lot of traveling for someone under 18. And at 17, he's also a bronz level frequent flyer. find 1 tiny lie and everything else can be unraveled. It's amazing that some of you folks actually believe this perps story. Not sure if you travel much but where a passport is stamped is not a guarantee of how much a person has travelled. In some instances (a very low rate), passports are stamped chronologically but more often than not, it's random. I had friends at school (16yrs old) who travelled over 50,000 miles a year so being in a frequent flyer band is barely a basis for anything. Looks like your conclusions are all based on your own beliefs rather than hard fact. Edited: Clarifying flying miles statement. Hi Inedible, What can easily remedy some of the questions being posed here about the credibility of Zhou Tong, is a nice long youtube video where he explains everything in detail (including the organized crime figure/relic hunter). If he posts a nice long youtube video and holds up his alleged passport to proved that he's the same person that traveled on the dates of those stamps then I'll shut up and stop "jumping to conclusions" about a guy that was 17 that ran off with other people's money. Waiting for that youtube video Zhou Tong!!!!! I'm going to create a new thread just to ask for that video. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Matthew N. Wright on April 24, 2013, 01:12:31 AM More interesting is that fact that the stamps are on PAGE 20 of his alleged passport. That's a heck of a lot of traveling for someone under 18. And at 17, he's also a bronz level frequent flyer. find 1 tiny lie and everything else can be unraveled. It's amazing that some of you folks actually believe this perps story. Not sure if you travel much but where a passport is stamped is not a guarantee of how much a person has travelled. In some instances (a very low rate), passports are stamped chronologically but more often than not, it's random. I had friends at school (16yrs old) who travelled over 50,000 miles a year so being in a frequent flyer band is barely a basis for anything. Looks like your conclusions are all based on your own beliefs rather than hard fact. Edited: Clarifying flying miles statement. Hi Inedible, What can easily remedy some of the questions being posed here about the credibility of Zhou Tong, is a nice long youtube video where he explains everything in detail (including the organized crime figure/relic hunter). If he posts a nice long youtube video and holds up his alleged passport to proved that he's the same person that traveled on the dates of those stamps then I'll shut up and stop "jumping to conclusions" about a guy that was 17 that ran off with other people's money. Waiting for that youtube video Zhou Tong!!!!! I'm going to create a new thread just to ask for that video. Somehow I doubt that would answer *any* of the questions posed in this thread. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Inedible on April 24, 2013, 01:14:03 AM My 20 year career has taught me that there are con-men and there are victims. Victims are often reluctant to accept the fact that they are victims or will be victims. On this forum, I'm not the one who has to establish credibility. Instead I'm the one that can question the stories put forward by an individual who has not proven anything that he has espoused thus far. I'm not here to attempt to convince anyone to once again "believe" in me because I'm here with a new project and need the buy-in of forum members. This person re-surfaced after 11 months? WHY? New Project? That must be con-man talk for "New Scam". You're making an argument from authority with your claim of 20yrs of experience in detecting lies. You kinda need to back it up with some evidence seeing as you're impugning someone else's reputation. I don't know why he's resurfaced and you're right to be sceptical as I'm sure anyone should would be. With your 20yrs of experience you might well be correct (that he's definitely over 18 and that he's the criminal mastermind of the stolen Bitcoinica funds) but I'm just saying that you've come to a definite conclusion based on opinions (not facts) that don't support your position which, to me, casts your other opinions/conclusions in doubt. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Pangia on April 24, 2013, 01:16:39 AM Waiting for that youtube video Zhou Tong!!!!!
I'm going to create a new thread just to ask for that video. Somehow I doubt that would answer *any* of the questions posed in this thread. The defensive answer of course is to say that the video wouldn't help. Somehow, I doubt that he would ever post a nice long video of him explaining everything whilst holding up his passport for all to see. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Pangia on April 24, 2013, 01:18:43 AM My 20 year career has taught me that there are con-men and there are victims. Victims are often reluctant to accept the fact that they are victims or will be victims. On this forum, I'm not the one who has to establish credibility. Instead I'm the one that can question the stories put forward by an individual who has not proven anything that he has espoused thus far. I'm not here to attempt to convince anyone to once again "believe" in me because I'm here with a new project and need the buy-in of forum members. This person re-surfaced after 11 months? WHY? New Project? That must be con-man talk for "New Scam". You're making an argument from authority with your claim of 20yrs of experience in detecting lies. You kinda need to back it up with some evidence seeing as you're impugning someone else's reputation. I don't know why he's resurfaced and you're right to be sceptical as I'm sure anyone should would be. With your 20yrs of experience you might well be correct (that he's definitely over 18 and that he's the criminal mastermind of the stolen Bitcoinica funds) but I'm just saying that you've come to a definite conclusion based on opinions (not facts) that don't support your position which, to me, casts your other opinions/conclusions in doubt. You are most welcomed to casts doubts on my hunch because I'm not here trying to sell a "new project". In regards to impugning Zhou Tong's reputation, did I really impugn it? I think that he's done a wonderful job all on his own with that. What I have put forward is an ideal opportunity to shut everyone up. Put up a long youtube video to explain everything and hold up his alleged passport to prove that it's actually his. If you or I were in his position (attempting to establish our credibility), how difficult would that be? Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Inedible on April 24, 2013, 01:25:20 AM Hi Inedible, What can easily remedy some of the questions being posed here about the credibility of Zhou Tong, is a nice long youtube video where he explains everything in detail (including the organized crime figure/relic hunter). If he posts a nice long youtube video and holds up his alleged passport to proved that he's the same person that traveled on the dates of those stamps then I'll shut up and stop "jumping to conclusions" about a guy that was 17 that ran off with other people's money. Waiting for that youtube video Zhou Tong!!!!! I'm going to create a new thread just to ask for that video. Hi Pangia, That would definitely prove his age. (He'd probably want to mask out his passport number though.) Not sure he'd want to have a video of him talking about this incident though - certainly any lawyer would tell him not to but if proof of age is one of the issues, this would definitely sort it out. I believe a credible member of Bitcointalk once vouched for his age and his word was good enough for the masses the last time this came up but I don't remember the username. Maybe someone else does? As far as jumping to conclusions is concerned, you've stated as fact that you know he's older than 18 and through various other beliefs you claimed he was a con artist (it's part of your job to know these things after all). Personally, I don't know if he's 18 or 38 but I remember the last time this came up, I was concerned that he might be a minor and it was a bit too much like a mob after one kid. Everyone was all "well he might be an old man" and I was all like "what if he's not?". Things calmed down after a while but there were threats of physical violence at the time. Anyway, I hope your request for the video works out. Might work better if you don't come from a neutral position rather than that of "I know you're guilty!". Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: BTC Books on April 24, 2013, 01:27:34 AM Very few people have met me so far Name one. Just one on this forum who has any level of trust, and is known face-to-face by other users. One. Wondering... Waiting patiently... Oh zhoutong... hello? Over here... Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Inedible on April 24, 2013, 01:29:44 AM Somehow, I doubt that he would ever post a nice long video of him explaining everything whilst holding up his passport for all to see. I'm pretty certain you won't get a long explanation on video - it was 12 months ago, it was complex and it would be easy to remember something incorrectly. It would also be too easy for him to make a simple mistake for everyone to hang him with. He ought to be able to talk for a minute or two and show his passport though. The unfortunate thing is that all this does is prove his age. As someone said, it's the least interesting thing about this case but I agree with you that if he's lying about this, it's a good reason to doubt everything else he's saying, however, you do seem to be coming from a position of "guilty". Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: gollum on April 24, 2013, 01:30:59 AM Very few people have met me so far Name one. Just one on this forum who has any level of trust, and is known face-to-face by other users. One. Wondering... Waiting patiently... Oh zhoutong... hello? Over here... No one has met Satoshi face-2-face, still millions of people trust his creation. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: bitcoinminer on April 24, 2013, 01:31:52 AM Can we all braid each other's hair and eat sugary snacks while we watch together?
Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: BTC Books on April 24, 2013, 01:35:00 AM Very few people have met me so far Name one. Just one on this forum who has any level of trust, and is known face-to-face by other users. One. Wondering... Waiting patiently... Oh zhoutong... hello? Over here... No one has met Satoshi face-2-face, still millions of people trust his creation. At the beginning there was no reason not to trust it. Bitcoin was worth nothing and it didn't matter. Now, we trust all the developers and exchange owners who are known to us - face-to-face. That was a silly conflation, gollum. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Inedible on April 24, 2013, 01:35:31 AM You are most welcomed to casts doubts on my hunch because I'm not here trying to sell a "new project". In regards to impugning Zhou Tong's reputation, did I really impugn it? I think that he's done a wonderful job all on his own with that. What I have put forward is an ideal opportunity to shut everyone up. Put up a long youtube video to explain everything and hold up his alleged passport to prove that it's actually his. If you or I were in his position (attempting to establish our credibility), how difficult would that be? It's not a hunch when you've stated you KNOW FOR A FACT that he's lying about his age, his travelling, his passport, etc. That's a claim, not a hunch. What you then put forward is an intrusive way for someone to prove their age. It just makes me think of the times when Obama was accused of not being born in America and all he had to do was show his birth certificate. When he did that, they all claimed it was faked. Personally, if it were me, I would Skype a reliable and established forum member (one of the moderators or the forum owner). Honestly, you'd get a better response if you didn't come from this from a "he's guilty" angle. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Inedible on April 24, 2013, 01:37:35 AM No one has met Satoshi face-2-face, still millions of people trust his creation. That analogy doesn't work. Satoshi has no credibility issue, nor does Bitcoin because it's Open Source and can be independently verified. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Pangia on April 24, 2013, 01:38:47 AM No one has met Satoshi face-2-face, still millions of people trust his creation. Very true! But is Satoshi alleged to have fleeced people out of thousands of Bitcoins??? Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: gollum on April 24, 2013, 01:42:21 AM No one has met Satoshi face-2-face, still millions of people trust his creation. Very true! But is Satoshi alleged to have fleeced people out of thousands of Bitcoins??? No, but he got 1,5 million coins. you never know when he is going to dump them into the market. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: repentance on April 24, 2013, 01:44:58 AM I believe a credible member of Bitcointalk once vouched for his age and his word was good enough for the masses the last time this came up but I don't remember the username. Maybe someone else does? Perhaps you're thinking of this post by Tihan. Quote Zhou Tong is exactly who he says he is. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=97272.msg1073435#msg1073435 Tihan met Zhou in person. Whether or not Zhou's lying about his age to this community and to Australian authorities is far less interesting to me than whether he's lying about things directly related to the downfall of Bitcoinica. Telling the truth about his age doesn't prove he had no involvement in the destruction of Bitcoinica and lying about his age wouldn't prove that he had active involvement in the events which destroyed Bitcoinica. A pretty irrefutable connection was made between the stolen Bitcoinica funds and Zhou. The big question is whether or not you believe Zhou's explanation for that connection. A secondary question is whether law enforcement was ever asked to investigate that connection. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Inedible on April 24, 2013, 01:46:27 AM Very few people have met me so far Name one. Just one on this forum who has any level of trust, and is known face-to-face by other users. One. Wondering... Waiting patiently... Oh zhoutong... hello? Over here... I'm pretty sure there was someone that met him. He runs a Bitcoin business of some sort. Might be a coffee seller? I don't recall. Can anyone remember him from the previous Bitcoinica thread? Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Inedible on April 24, 2013, 01:51:28 AM I believe a credible member of Bitcointalk once vouched for his age and his word was good enough for the masses the last time this came up but I don't remember the username. Maybe someone else does? Perhaps you're thinking of this post by Tihan. Quote Zhou Tong is exactly who he says he is. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=97272.msg1073435#msg1073435 Tihan met Zhou in person. Whether or not Zhou's lying about his age to this community and to Australian authorities is far less interesting to me than whether he's lying about things directly related to the downfall of Bitcoinica. Telling the truth about his age doesn't prove he had no involvement in the destruction of Bitcoinica and lying about his age wouldn't prove that he had active involvement in the events which destroyed Bitcoinica. A pretty irrefutable connection was made between the stolen Bitcoinica funds and Zhou. The big question is whether or not you believe Zhou's explanation for that connection. A secondary question is whether law enforcement was ever asked to investigate that connection. An amazing find repentance! I remember this post but I believe there was another one. The poster attended a meeting with ZT and was a respected forum member too. Still, this is easily resolved by the video/Skype idea. As intrusive as it is, it would help ZT re-establish his credibility. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: dancingnancy on April 24, 2013, 01:54:37 AM Oh look who it is. How is the Chinese relic hunter multi-billionaire triad boss über hacker? Unfortunately he can't be reached any more. It's always easy to just go offline forever. He did return majority of the funds, just not in the right combination of USD and BTC. I don't think he enjoys the incident. He is/was living in Heilongjiang Province, which is too cold for me to even travel there (I go to China only during fall or winter). I don't think the address is where he lives though. Made up people often live in cold places. Just look at Santa. Matthew the two time scammer tag troll you paid trying to make you look like the victim in all of this is not going to work out too well. It would be best to assist in cleaning up your first mess (bitcoinica and its "hack") before you make a new project. I'm pragmatic - I want to maximize my value for the community. Unfortunately there's really nothing much I can do to accelerate Bitcoinica's liquidation. I wasn't even a shareholder or creditor (so I can't sue them for compensation or anything). So instead of hoping for the best with something I really don't have the capacity to do, I'm thinking of doing something that's 1) good for Bitcoin and 2) not requiring much trust. Zhoutong, Can you try to assist the liquidators in any way possible? Mt. Gox is telling some B.S. about how they haven't received sufficient evidence as to who owns what accounts from the liquidators. Not sure who is telling the truth anymore. If you are interested in helping out I can PM you the liquidators E-Mail. It's been like a year and I could pay for my graduate school with the amount I have in BTC right now being held hostage. Really still hurting from all of this. Perhaps you can send them account information that they are lacking, which they can give to Mt. Gox to expedite this process? As of now, no one gives a shit, except for us (the creditors). Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Pangia on April 24, 2013, 01:55:26 AM I believe a credible member of Bitcointalk once vouched for his age and his word was good enough for the masses the last time this came up but I don't remember the username. Maybe someone else does? Perhaps you're thinking of this post by Tihan. Quote Zhou Tong is exactly who he says he is. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=97272.msg1073435#msg1073435 Tihan met Zhou in person. Whether or not Zhou's lying about his age to this community and to Australian authorities is far less interesting to me than whether he's lying about things directly related to the downfall of Bitcoinica. Telling the truth about his age doesn't prove he had no involvement in the destruction of Bitcoinica and lying about his age wouldn't prove that he had active involvement in the events which destroyed Bitcoinica. A pretty irrefutable connection was made between the stolen Bitcoinica funds and Zhou. The big question is whether or not you believe Zhou's explanation for that connection. A secondary question is whether law enforcement was ever asked to investigate that connection. Hi Repentence, Age isn't that big of a deal in the grand scheme of things, BUT it establishes credibility with everything else. Lie about that and why should I believe you about anything else you have to tell me? Age isn't the issue, but he stated it and it is a statement that can be proven by him with evidence to back it up. The allegations about the theft is something that is difficult to prove or disprove, but his age isn't. Use the little lie (age) to draw him out (yes I know he's reading this). Surprisingly he hasn't responded about posting a youtube video. Like most cons he'll probably try to avoid any in-person contact and will most likely post a response, maybe even with a photo-shopped copy of a passport showing a d.o.b. with the passport # redacted as a way of saying he needs to hide his identity. Unless he posts a nice long video explaining everything and then holding up his passport to prove that what he posted is credible, he's full of it. The defense of ----"posting a video might be a poor decision relative to a court case" is also bull. He's posted enough excuses/explanation on the forum, how would a video be problematic. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Inedible on April 24, 2013, 02:04:01 AM Age isn't that big of a deal in the grand scheme of things, BUT it establishes credibility with everything else. By this reasoning, can we assume you'll accept have no credibility if he turns out to be 18? He's posted enough excuses/explanation on the forum, how would a video be problematic. Skyping a moderator would probably the way to go but video evidence would satisfy 99% of people. Explaining on a video would serve no purpose other than to re-hash what he's already written with the added penalty of any accidental mistakes made being used as 'evidence' that he's lying. If he reads a script then that's as good as what he's already posted. The only use for an explanation on video is if someone were to ask him questions at time of recording in hope of tripping him up. Not sure why anyone would subject themselves to that liability. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: repentance on April 24, 2013, 02:17:36 AM I'm still not sure what a video would prove. Zhou's had many months to polish his story, so I don't think that having slicker answers now than he had at the time the events happened would in any way make his story more credible.
Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Transisto on April 24, 2013, 02:24:29 AM WHAT IS THIS ? "He could easy find out if he used plain text password in any of his websites." What website does he have ? This was the email you were using regularly to exchange with peoples, How would some bogus "using plain text password in any of *? websites." give him access to it ? I'm asking you again ... What is this ? ^ Also why edit this posts from yesterday ? Quote Quote from: bitdragon on Today at 08:13:32 AM Into: Quote from: Elwar on Today at 06:23:37 AM You say that there is no place to short bitcoins but Bitfinex is up and running using your code from Bitcoinica. Have you checked that out? You can buy Put options through MPEX. It's not quite the Addictive nature of margin trading ala bitcoinica but definitely has a place in a solid financial plan. And dare I say that the security model inspires. Yeah, I like MPEX's model. I think it'll inspire me a lot if I'm going to start another Bitcoin venture (IF). Quote Quote from: Elwar on April 23, 2013, 06:23:37 AM You say that there is no place to short bitcoins but Bitfinex is up and running using your code from Bitcoinica. Have you checked that out? Yes. I'm not so sure whether the code is based on Bitcoinica. Anyway, I think there's still no trading venue that has the amount of trades that Bitcoinica had. At its peak Bitcoinica had 150000 BTC open interest. That's what I mean by "viable way of shorting". Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: nrd525 on April 24, 2013, 03:25:52 AM Silly drama.
Q: Why would Zhoutong lie about being 17 when he started bitcoinica? It isn't the kind of lie you tell that will encourage people to entrust hundreds of thousands of dollars with you. A: it wasn't a lie. Pangia - registration date March 31. Nice trolling. Zhoutong made major mistakes - as has been true of a lot of people in bitcoin (and a lot of software developers in general - you've had software crash on you before, yes?) - and most noticeably he made his mistakes not just with software but with money. On the other hand, there is no evidence yet that he had malicious intentions or intentionally scammed anyone and he fits the profile of a young computer programmer with lofty dreams. He has admitted his mistakes and has made some amends. Note: I'm still waiting for my bitcoinica liquidation money Sidenote to Zhoutong - Bitfinex, imperfect as it may be (and one of the biggest problems being MtGox lag) currently looks like it is much more secure and developed than your site ever was and is almost equal in transaction volume. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: ninjarobot on April 24, 2013, 03:29:59 AM This Chen Jianhai story is the biggest load of poppycock I've ever heard.
All one needs to do is to read this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=95795.msg1055627#msg1055627 And this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=95738.msg1054890#msg1054890 Lets review the facts:
Of course before Chen mysteriously disappeared Zhou stated that "Currently I'm very willing to co-operate with any investigation because this is the only way I can completely prove my innocence." and "I have repeatedly said that I have zero tolerance in this matter and I will report all his information, including his real bank account number and address to the police once the official investigation has started." However when I wanted to file a police report with my local authorities and asked Zhou to provide me the address details for Chen, I received the following reply: Quote If you insist on filing a police report on this matter, any lack of co-operation from my side can of course be used against me in the uncertain future. I'm not protecting his identity. I just deem it to be unnecessary at this point. He is not running away (AFAIK he doesn't even have a passport), and the fund return is pending Bitcoinica's liquidation. I want to go back to my own business and focus on something productive. Any information I provide now will necessarily be a burden in the near future. I strongly advise you not to involve the police before the liquidation process has any significant development. You are not obliged to report this. (But when you do, I'm obliged to provide information to either you, or the police, and obviously I would prefer the former.) My point is, there is very little benefit to this, yet the risk and potential expense are too high. I don't want to hire a lawyer or waste my time on gathering evidence or whatever. I contributed 5,000 BTC and talked to the creditors regularly exactly because I wanted to avoid any lawsuits against me. I'm all for justice, but I have already given up on Bitcoin and justice in this matter seems worthless to me. Considering the suspicion raised by community members, the questions from trusted business partners and threats of violence, I don't have any energy to fight back any more. I just want the fiasco to be over. Yet people are giving me more and more troubles. It's okay if you can't feel the pain, please just try to sympathize. I have plans to immigrate to Australia and I need an absolutely clean record. Even a criminal accusation (without conviction) is intolerable in the character check. I really deeply regret the creation of Bitcoinica. If you can forget about me, please do. I'm returning to Melbourne on October 6, 2012. Hopefully something will happen at Bitcoinica side, and you have plenty time to re-consider your decision before then. I agreed and waited for Zhou to return to Melbourne. However upon his return Zhou ignored all my follow up emails. I have never been able to obtains any details about Chen from Zhou nor have I been able to file an actionable report. In the mean time Bitcoinica creditors are still smack in the middle of what must be the largest clusterf*ck in bitcoin history with the MtGox account orphaned and frozen. The AurumXchange funds still missing and an ongoing lawsuit against the Bitcoin Consultancy by the largest creditors. Considering that Bitcoinica had around 1M USD in deposits when it got hacked, and conservatively estimating 50% of that to be in BTC, at current valuations we are talking in excess of 15,000,000 USD still pending liquidation. Or what is left of it. Now, Zhou returns 1 year later, hoping the dust has settled with his "Hero member" tag still in tact. Well played sir! I suggest that at the very least Zhou receives an "Untrustworthy" tag. Although I do realize that might be an insult to MNW whom I regard much more highly. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: repentance on April 24, 2013, 03:36:35 AM Quote I have plans to immigrate to Australia and I need an absolutely clean record. Bwahahaha. Good luck with that. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: bitcoinminer on April 24, 2013, 03:37:14 AM <golf clap> for ninjarobot - well played sir.
Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on April 24, 2013, 04:00:19 AM Very few people have met me so far Name one. Just one on this forum who has any level of trust, and is known face-to-face by other users. One. I've yet to met up face-to-face with a fellow Bitcoiner, although The Joint doesn't live that far from me. Close to the same neighborhood lives another Bitcoiner of which my dad and I once picked a giant pile of garbage from the yard of his neighbor when they were evicted. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Vod on April 24, 2013, 04:09:49 AM I suggest that at the very least Zhou receives an "Untrustworthy" tag. Good luck with THAT. Zhou has paid off the forum. Your coins are being used to update this forum's software. ;) Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: jubalix on April 24, 2013, 04:59:04 AM This Chen Jianhai story is the biggest load of poppycock I've ever heard. All one needs to do is to read this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=95795.msg1055627#msg1055627 And this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=95738.msg1054890#msg1054890 Lets review the facts:
Of course before Chen mysteriously disappeared Zhou stated that "Currently I'm very willing to co-operate with any investigation because this is the only way I can completely prove my innocence." and "I have repeatedly said that I have zero tolerance in this matter and I will report all his information, including his real bank account number and address to the police once the official investigation has started." However when I wanted to file a police report with my local authorities and asked Zhou to provide me the address details for Chen, I received the following reply: Quote If you insist on filing a police report on this matter, any lack of co-operation from my side can of course be used against me in the uncertain future. I'm not protecting his identity. I just deem it to be unnecessary at this point. He is not running away (AFAIK he doesn't even have a passport), and the fund return is pending Bitcoinica's liquidation. I want to go back to my own business and focus on something productive. Any information I provide now will necessarily be a burden in the near future. I strongly advise you not to involve the police before the liquidation process has any significant development. You are not obliged to report this. (But when you do, I'm obliged to provide information to either you, or the police, and obviously I would prefer the former.) My point is, there is very little benefit to this, yet the risk and potential expense are too high. I don't want to hire a lawyer or waste my time on gathering evidence or whatever. I contributed 5,000 BTC and talked to the creditors regularly exactly because I wanted to avoid any lawsuits against me. I'm all for justice, but I have already given up on Bitcoin and justice in this matter seems worthless to me. Considering the suspicion raised by community members, the questions from trusted business partners and threats of violence, I don't have any energy to fight back any more. I just want the fiasco to be over. Yet people are giving me more and more troubles. It's okay if you can't feel the pain, please just try to sympathize. I have plans to immigrate to Australia and I need an absolutely clean record. Even a criminal accusation (without conviction) is intolerable in the character check. I really deeply regret the creation of Bitcoinica. If you can forget about me, please do. I'm returning to Melbourne on October 6, 2012. Hopefully something will happen at Bitcoinica side, and you have plenty time to re-consider your decision before then. I agreed and waited for Zhou to return to Melbourne. However upon his return Zhou ignored all my follow up emails. I have never been able to obtains any details about Chen from Zhou nor have I been able to file an actionable report. In the mean time Bitcoinica creditors are still smack in the middle of what must be the largest clusterf*ck in bitcoin history with the MtGox account orphaned and frozen. The AurumXchange funds still missing and an ongoing lawsuit against the Bitcoin Consultancy by the largest creditors. Considering that Bitcoinica had around 1M USD in deposits when it got hacked, and conservatively estimating 50% of that to be in BTC, at current valuations we are talking in excess of 15,000,000 USD still pending liquidation. Or what is left of it. Now, Zhou returns 1 year later, hoping the dust has settled with his "Hero member" tag still in tact. Well played sir! I suggest that at the very least Zhou receives an "Untrustworthy" tag. Although I do realize that might be an insult to MNW whom I regard much more highly. This looks very comprehensive, and well set out. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: zhoutong on April 24, 2013, 05:08:36 AM I agreed and waited for Zhou to return to Melbourne. However upon his return Zhou ignored all my follow up emails. I have never been able to obtains any details about Chen from Zhou nor have I been able to file an actionable report. In the mean time Bitcoinica creditors are still smack in the middle of what must be the largest clusterf*ck in bitcoin history with the MtGox account orphaned and frozen. The AurumXchange funds still missing and an ongoing lawsuit against the Bitcoin Consultancy by the largest creditors. Considering that Bitcoinica had around 1M USD in deposits when it got hacked, and conservatively estimating 50% of that to be in BTC, at current valuations we are talking in excess of 15,000,000 USD still pending liquidation. Or what is left of it. Now, Zhou returns 1 year later, hoping the dust has settled with his "Hero member" tag still in tact. Well played sir! I suggest that at the very least Zhou receives an "Untrustworthy" tag. Although I do realize that might be an insult to MNW whom I regard much more highly. Sorry ninjarobot. I was really annoyed and depressed at that time so I didn't give a response to you. However, I have replied your email with his bank account and address information that I currently have. Hope it'll be helpful to whatever you plan to do. I'm a little disturbed by the fact that you posted my email reply publicly without my permission. It's not a big deal but I was really emotional at that time (and I wouldn't have said those words if it's not private communication). It'll be great if you can treat it as strictly personal rather than public announcement. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: simonk83 on April 24, 2013, 05:11:39 AM Welcome back. Now, about that huge crime you pulled off...
Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: laanwj on April 24, 2013, 05:19:18 AM Welcome back. You have some balls to come back here with your original name. But it's a honest gesture.
I hope you have learned from your mistakes and will be more careful this time. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: ninjarobot on April 24, 2013, 05:24:31 AM Sorry ninjarobot. I was really annoyed and depressed at that time so I didn't give a response to you. However, I have replied your email with his bank account and address information that I currently have. Hope it'll be helpful to whatever you plan to do. Thanks Zhou. I have received it and will pass it on to the Bitcoinica Liquidator. Quote I'm a little disturbed by the fact that you posted my email reply publicly without my permission. My apologies. I realize it was a bit of a d*ck move. However I do feel it is important that the whole truth is revealed and there were no disclaimers on the email. I should have asked for your permission though. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: zhoutong on April 24, 2013, 05:24:39 AM Some of you are right. I shouldn't really start this thread. It will just bring back all the arguments all over again.
I have posted conclusive evidence that I was traveling during the Bitcoinica hack and it's consistent with my claim that I was dealing with a Singapore friend (in-person) for the LR transfer. I was trying to give as many details as possible regarding CJH's involvement. That's pretty much all the available information I have. He returned almost all funds but in the wrong asset combination, and Bitcoinica failed to adjust the recovered funds to the right combination, as a result BTC liability has rocketed before the liquidation has shown any progress. There are good reasons for the forum to not label me a Scammer. One of them is the fact that I'm not. The other is the lack of conclusive evidence. I trust forum admin's rational consideration and our community will be more harmonious if there can be less finger-pointing and heartless accusations. I'm still a teenager and it was really not easy to have gone through this. It's perhaps better for me to silently focus on my work and deliver something good for Bitcoin that doesn't require much trust. My reputation is pretty much ruined in this community regardless of how much evidence I bring to the table. (It's easy to blame people.) Again, just want to say that I'm back, for the good. You always need to choose who to trust carefully and I'm well aware that any project I create in the future will only gain as much credibility as a Newbie with 5 posts. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: zhoutong on April 24, 2013, 05:28:21 AM Sorry ninjarobot. I was really annoyed and depressed at that time so I didn't give a response to you. However, I have replied your email with his bank account and address information that I currently have. Hope it'll be helpful to whatever you plan to do. Thanks Zhou. I have received it and will pass it on to the Bitcoinica Liquidator. Quote I'm a little disturbed by the fact that you posted my email reply publicly without my permission. My apologies. I realize it was a bit of a d*ck move. However I do feel it is important that the whole truth is revealed and there were no disclaimers on the email. I should have asked for your permission though. I appreciate your understanding. I said those words because I trusted you not to use any of the information against me (not strictly legal context, but rather more applicably, social context). I wanted to show some good faith and integrity but the community's blame had hurt all my confidence. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: simonk83 on April 24, 2013, 05:32:39 AM (It's easy to blame people.) Well it's not always easy to blame people, but in this case it was fairly easy, yeah. We'll see what comes of the Chen information, but forgive me if I won't be at all surprised if he's "mysteriously disappeared". Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Maged on April 24, 2013, 05:36:07 AM Zhou,
Don't be discouraged by all of the negative posts you see here. There are plenty of people watching this from the sidelines just to see how this plays out that are really on your side here. You have a lot more potential than you imagine. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Matthew N. Wright on April 24, 2013, 05:36:43 AM You have a lot more potential than you imagine. That's exactly what their worried about. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: zhoutong on April 24, 2013, 05:43:20 AM Zhou, Don't be discouraged by all of the negative posts you see here. There are plenty of people watching this from the sidelines just to see how this plays out that are really on your side here. You have a lot more potential than you imagine. Thanks Maged. I did receive a few PMs and many more emails. Some people are still happy to invite to join their startups despite all this drama. I'm here much more prepared this time, with two fairly successful businesses and frequent contacts with my best friends on a daily basis. I have also spoken to a counsellor last year. So it's not really that easy to be discouraged, to be honest. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Maged on April 24, 2013, 05:43:28 AM You have a lot more potential than you imagine. That's exactly what their worried about. What Zhou needs are some good partners who know what they're doing. Admittedly, the problem there is figuring out who that could be, as we've seen. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Matthew N. Wright on April 24, 2013, 05:44:16 AM You have a lot more potential than you imagine. That's exactly what their worried about. What Zhou needs are some good partners who know what their doing. Admittedly, the problem there is figuring out who that could be, as we've seen. I didn't say *I* was worried, I said they were. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Transisto on April 24, 2013, 06:21:09 AM Quote I contributed 5,000 BTC and talked to the creditors regularly exactly because I wanted to avoid any lawsuits against me. I'd like to remind you ; That 5000BTC !,,, You've thrown it out of the window, You haven't verified claims other than maybe glancing over them for a minute. That is an irresponsible move only someone with too many illegitimately acquired BTCs would pull while seeking both repentance and praises from the public. You're a wise ass, but time will get it back onto you. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: zhoutong on April 24, 2013, 06:26:23 AM Quote I contributed 5,000 BTC and talked to the creditors regularly exactly because I wanted to avoid any lawsuits against me. I'd like to remind you ; That 5000BTC !,,, You've thrown it out of the window, You haven't verified claims other than maybe glancing over them for a minute. That is an irresponsible move only someone with too many illegitimately acquired BTCs would pull while seeking both repentance and praises from the public. You're a wise ass, but time will get it back to you. At least I sent the largest portion of the compensation to Roger Ver, whom I know and trust very much. I believe I have also verified all claims above 1000 BTC. There may be some rough claims of 10 BTC or 50 BTC, but they represent a tiny proportion. Again, it's my money and you have no right over the allocation of the sum. EDIT: Trace the coins all you can. Aside from the 100 BTC donated by hacker I'm pretty sure the rest are legitimate coins once stored in either Mt. Gox or Bitcoinica. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Transisto on April 24, 2013, 06:32:44 AM Quote I contributed 5,000 BTC and talked to the creditors regularly exactly because I wanted to avoid any lawsuits against me. I'd like to remind you ; That 5000BTC !,,, You've thrown it out of the window, You haven't verified claims other than maybe glancing over them for a minute. That is an irresponsible move only someone with too many illegitimately acquired BTCs would pull while seeking both repentance and praises from the public. You're a wise ass, but time will get it back to you. At least I sent the largest portion of the compensation to Roger Ver, whom I know and trust very much. I believe I have also verified all claims above 1000 BTC. There may be some rough claims of 10 BTC or 50 BTC, but they represent a tiny proportion. Again, it's my money and you have no right over the allocation of the sum. EDIT: Trace the coins all you can. Aside from the 100 BTC donated by hacker I'm pretty sure the rest are legitimate coins once stored in either Mt. Gox or Bitcoinica. I had written the details of my claim "open positions" in the note field. Not giving a fuck was pretty much what your response conveyed. My claim is of almost 3000BTC Edit : I understood you did that only to gather praise from the public and then get the attention away from you ASAP. Edit 2 : It's not because these 5000 coins were legit that the stolen coins didn't made those less valuable to you. (coin mixing is rather effective and you knew it) Edit 3 : How can you claim the hacker returned everything ? He converted 20 000 btc into 100 000$ while the exchange rate was ~7$ ? He kept 50 000$ ? Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: ninjarobot on April 24, 2013, 06:55:43 AM EDIT: Trace the coins all you can. Aside from the 100 BTC donated by hacker I'm pretty sure the rest are legitimate coins once stored in either Mt. Gox or Bitcoinica. The fact that Zhou accepted 100 BTC of the stolen coins as a donation to his personal fund distribution represented a clear conflict of interest. He should have sent that directly back to Bitcoinica. I did receive some compensation from Zhou's donation fund and decided to send 100 BTC from that back to the Bitcoinica Recovery Fund managed by Patrick Murk to compensate for the hacker donation. So that should be covered now. Transaction ID: http://blockchain.info/tx-index/14361561/bb91cd10d615ffa39a092100708168567a440e3f2adb171a550de91ad990e1e9 Also note that the recovery fund only received ~15.000 BTC back from Chen Jianhai through Zhou. Although Zhou claimed that he could recover 20.000 BTC from Chen. I wonder if he is counting his 5000 BTC compensation as part of the recovery funds... And if not, why is there 5000 BTC is missing from the reclaimed funds? (It might be explained somewhere, in which case I missed it) Recovery address: http://blockchain.info/address/1N99P8Z5AQXWEYZiS6ddov9Fyc4kuGPpwJ (15,006 BTC) I have gathered some data to estimate the amount that can be recovered from Chen Jianhai: USD: about $140,000 + $5000 frozen at AurumXchange (under SJ account) BTC: about 20,000 BTC There's an unknown amount of funds left in Chris Heaslip's account and I have no way of knowing the exact balance. Chen Jianhai was only able to offer the above-mentioned amount due to the cost of his laundering activities and also the significantly lower Bitcoin price when he cashed out. If Bitcoinica or the community wants him to cover the full amount at today's prices, I'm willing to co-operate with any police investigation. But either case, my previous donation should have pretty much covered the difference. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Inedible on April 24, 2013, 07:34:47 AM Whatever happened to the Fund managed by Patrick Murk? Did he ever distribute any of those funds to the creditors?
Do people still trust those guys that ran Bitcoinica during this saga? I see they're running new businesses but I for one won't touch them with a bargepole. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Alex Zee on April 24, 2013, 07:35:15 AM It's perhaps better for me to silently focus on my work and deliver something good for Bitcoin that doesn't require much trust. My reputation is pretty much ruined in this community regardless of how much evidence I bring to the table. (It's easy to blame people.) You can help your reputation by doing a Q&A session on Ustream or even simply posting a long YouTube video. What will be your excuse for that? Don't know how to use YouTube? Don't have webcamera? Don't have mobile phone? Or that it "won't prove anything"? Maybe it won't, but it's a good start if you really want to improve your reputation. Instead, what I see is that you cherry pick posts to answer and ignore posts that are not so easy to answer. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Inedible on April 24, 2013, 07:36:44 AM Silly drama. Q: Why would Zhoutong lie about being 17 when he started bitcoinica? It isn't the kind of lie you tell that will encourage people to entrust hundreds of thousands of dollars with you. A: it wasn't a lie. Pangia - registration date March 31. Nice trolling. I'm not sure that's conclusive evidence he didn't lie about his age and registration date isn't a reliable indicator of trollality. There are trolls here that have been registered for years lol Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Inedible on April 24, 2013, 07:39:04 AM This Chen Jianhai story is the biggest load of poppycock I've ever heard. All one needs to do is to read this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=95795.msg1055627#msg1055627 And this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=95738.msg1054890#msg1054890 Lets review the facts:
Of course before Chen mysteriously disappeared Zhou stated that "Currently I'm very willing to co-operate with any investigation because this is the only way I can completely prove my innocence." and "I have repeatedly said that I have zero tolerance in this matter and I will report all his information, including his real bank account number and address to the police once the official investigation has started." However when I wanted to file a police report with my local authorities and asked Zhou to provide me the address details for Chen, I received the following reply: Quote If you insist on filing a police report on this matter, any lack of co-operation from my side can of course be used against me in the uncertain future. I'm not protecting his identity. I just deem it to be unnecessary at this point. He is not running away (AFAIK he doesn't even have a passport), and the fund return is pending Bitcoinica's liquidation. I want to go back to my own business and focus on something productive. Any information I provide now will necessarily be a burden in the near future. I strongly advise you not to involve the police before the liquidation process has any significant development. You are not obliged to report this. (But when you do, I'm obliged to provide information to either you, or the police, and obviously I would prefer the former.) My point is, there is very little benefit to this, yet the risk and potential expense are too high. I don't want to hire a lawyer or waste my time on gathering evidence or whatever. I contributed 5,000 BTC and talked to the creditors regularly exactly because I wanted to avoid any lawsuits against me. I'm all for justice, but I have already given up on Bitcoin and justice in this matter seems worthless to me. Considering the suspicion raised by community members, the questions from trusted business partners and threats of violence, I don't have any energy to fight back any more. I just want the fiasco to be over. Yet people are giving me more and more troubles. It's okay if you can't feel the pain, please just try to sympathize. I have plans to immigrate to Australia and I need an absolutely clean record. Even a criminal accusation (without conviction) is intolerable in the character check. I really deeply regret the creation of Bitcoinica. If you can forget about me, please do. I'm returning to Melbourne on October 6, 2012. Hopefully something will happen at Bitcoinica side, and you have plenty time to re-consider your decision before then. I agreed and waited for Zhou to return to Melbourne. However upon his return Zhou ignored all my follow up emails. I have never been able to obtains any details about Chen from Zhou nor have I been able to file an actionable report. In the mean time Bitcoinica creditors are still smack in the middle of what must be the largest clusterf*ck in bitcoin history with the MtGox account orphaned and frozen. The AurumXchange funds still missing and an ongoing lawsuit against the Bitcoin Consultancy by the largest creditors. Considering that Bitcoinica had around 1M USD in deposits when it got hacked, and conservatively estimating 50% of that to be in BTC, at current valuations we are talking in excess of 15,000,000 USD still pending liquidation. Or what is left of it. Now, Zhou returns 1 year later, hoping the dust has settled with his "Hero member" tag still in tact. Well played sir! I suggest that at the very least Zhou receives an "Untrustworthy" tag. Although I do realize that might be an insult to MNW whom I regard much more highly. ninjarobot - this is an excellent post. Perhaps we could use this as the basis of a definitive, factual story if you and ZT agree? It would save countless retellings filled with bias and emotion and it can be linked to so people can read up on the story there when they inevitably ask for the details. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Alex Zee on April 24, 2013, 07:47:34 AM From what I know about con-men psychology, their biggest enjoyment is not in taking things, but in the feeling of being smarter than their victims because they could trick and fool them. They see it as "outsmarting" everybody else.
So I guess Zhou now gets a nice dose of endorphins reading all these heart-warming "welcome-backs" in this topic... Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: greyhawk on April 24, 2013, 07:53:01 AM You have a lot more potential than you imagine. That's exactly what their worried about. What Zhou needs are some good partners who know what they're doing. Like the Mafia? ??? Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Alex Zee on April 24, 2013, 08:04:57 AM This is the dumbest thing ever, what is a ustream Q&A going to do, that a thread like this will not do? It's a start. If somebody would really want to improve their reputation they would looking for ways to do it, not dodging them. Some of us have very big doubts that he is 18 years old. People in 18 don't talk like that, no matter how smart they are, because even if you are a genius, you can't compress time. Certain way of thinking (which is exposed through the way one's structuring their sentences) comes with raw years of experience, you can't "shortcut" that. You can't just load a life, "matrix-style", into the head of a kid. So he can easily start with proving his age. While even his age remains suspicious, why would I have any shred of trust with his new ventures? It was pointed out here, that we are not the ones who have to prove anything. He is. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Inedible on April 24, 2013, 08:07:17 AM This is the dumbest thing ever, what is a ustream Q&A going to do, that a thread like this will not do? It would definitely prove his passport is the one used in the travelling claim as there's no opportunity to doctor it as it's live. I assume the questioning session is to attempt to 'catch him out' in his 'web of lies'. He isn't a con man, just a teenager with too much coin power, and be quite frank he is smarter than a lot of teenagers, two businesses by the time he is 18. Come on some credit and respect is due to him, but to call him a con-man is a bit overboard. I'm not sure that proving his age will do anything. It'll quieten down some who believe if you lie about your age, all other claims against you must therefore be true but that's not really valid. The best thing to do is to just let him prove himself in his future conduct and be wary, as you should be with all things Bitcoin. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Este Nuno on April 24, 2013, 08:08:15 AM Zhoutong:
How do you feel about your name being often(I think? I don't watch every episode) mentioned in a negative light on a widely viewed international television network? For others who may not be aware: Max Keiser uses the phrase "Zhoutonged" in a derogatory manner on the news network Russia Today(RT). Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Inedible on April 24, 2013, 08:13:02 AM People in 18 don't talk like that, no matter how smart they are, because even if you are a genius, you can't compress time. He just seems well educated to me. He hasn't said anything that isn't capable of coming from a 16 yr old. His naivety is what gives away his age. His behaviour is that of someone who wants to earn your trust and will do things that put him in the firing line by doing so. Since his return I've noticed he's being a little more assertive and much less of a walkover which is good. Call it projection but he reminds me of my younger self - always thinking the best of people and always hoping for the best of a bad situation and always expecting the other person to reciprocate in kind if you submit first. This attitude works only if the people you're dealing with have the same behavioural pattern but in reality, most people are out for themselves and will paint you into a corner quicker than you can turn your back. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Alex Zee on April 24, 2013, 08:27:36 AM His behaviour is that of someone who wants to earn your trust and will do things that put him in the firing line by doing so. So, recording a YouTube video would be no problem, right? Let's see how it goes. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Inedible on April 24, 2013, 08:36:40 AM His behaviour is that of someone who wants to earn your trust and will do things that put him in the firing line by doing so. So, recording a YouTube video would be no problem, right? Let's see how it goes. lol so you want to put him in the firing line? I've never disagreed that doing a Youtube video would verify his age. I'm just sceptical as to who this placates and what exactly it'll prove. Will people believe the rest of his claims if his age is verified? I doubt it. So the least interesting thing about this whole saga is verified and nothing else changes. I'd say that's almost not worth the effort. Additionally, if I were ZT I'd go for the Skype verification via a moderator. There are crazy, angry people out there who could use that video for any purpose :/ Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Alex Zee on April 24, 2013, 08:50:45 AM Will people believe the rest of his claims if his age is verified? I doubt it. So the least interesting thing about this whole saga is verified and nothing else changes. I'd say that's almost not worth the effort. You just said he "will do things that put him in the firing line", now a youtube video is "not worth the effort"? He has to start somewhere. We don't know much tangible about him. His explanations sound like a made-up fairy tales. So posting a video seems to me like a cheap and effective way to start dealing with trust issues. And dodging it on any excuse, is an effective way to reduce thrust. Additionally, if I were ZT I'd go for the Skype verification via a moderator. There are crazy, angry people out there who could use that video for any purpose :/ Skype would be a start, too. But with somebody really trusted by the community. Moderators are in a conflict of interest, because the forum gets some financial support from him as I understand. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Inedible on April 24, 2013, 08:59:02 AM You just said he "will do things that put him in the firing line", now a youtube video is "not worth the effort"? Don't get me wrong. He's done plenty to put himself in the firing line. I'm not saying he should continue to do that though. It's not worth the effort because it'd be easier for him to do a Skype with someone instead. He has to start somewhere. We don't know much tangible about him. His explanations sound like a made-up fairy tales. So posting a video seems to me like a cheap and effective way to start dealing with trust issues. And dodging it on any excuse, is an effective way to reduce thrust. Can't disagree there. Skype would be a start, too. But with somebody really trusted by the community. Moderators are in a conflict of interest, because the forum gets some financial support from him as I understand. The forum once had something like stationary or hardware that he paid for out of his own pocket but I believe it was before the fiasco. You're right though, to avoid any possibility of impropriety it should be someone not connected. We should exclude Pirate. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Alex Zee on April 24, 2013, 09:06:47 AM So let's see. My bet is that he will continue to either ignore any such requests or come up with more and more ridiculous excuses not to do it.
Either way, it will be entertaining to observe :) Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Chakraball on April 24, 2013, 09:34:13 AM I suggest that at the very least Zhou receives an "Untrustworthy" tag. Good luck with THAT. Zhou has paid off the forum. Your coins are being used to update this forum's software. ;) Many a true word is spoken in jest. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: zhoutong on April 24, 2013, 10:32:10 AM So let's see. My bet is that he will continue to either ignore any such requests or come up with more and more ridiculous excuses not to do it. Either way, it will be entertaining to observe :) Neither. You just lost your bet. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=186261.0 Wait... What was your wager? Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Inedible on April 24, 2013, 10:38:03 AM So let's see. My bet is that he will continue to either ignore any such requests or come up with more and more ridiculous excuses not to do it. Either way, it will be entertaining to observe :) Neither. You just lost your bet. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=186261.0 Wait... What was your wager? You could have made your fortune right there! Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: repentance on April 24, 2013, 10:46:08 AM That's pretty much all the available information I have. He returned almost all funds but in the wrong asset combination, and Bitcoinica failed to adjust the recovered funds to the right combination, as a result BTC liability has rocketed before the liquidation has shown any progress. You know damned well that MtGox locked everyone out of the account after the intrusion and publicly stated that they weren't going to let anyone access the funds until the legal situation regarding who had the entitlement to distribute them was clarified. But hey, let's just write a new narrative which makes you look like the hero, just like you always do. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Alex Zee on April 24, 2013, 10:47:26 AM Holy shit! That was unexpected.
That's a nice start. You've just got some partial credibility in my book now. And you must have had quite a life and be pretty smart too to write like an adult in your 18. I am surprised. Of course, there is still a chance that your dad does all the writing and you only do "public appearances", but that sounds like a crazy conspiracy theory... :) Maybe you are who you claim to be, and there indeed exists that relic millionaire collector. Crazy things happen in life. Once in a while you see a movie about some incredible story that actually did happen. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Alex Zee on April 24, 2013, 10:54:46 AM Neither. You just lost your bet. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=186261.0 Wait... What was your wager? I didn't (carefully :) ) make any specific wagers, but Ok, $5 worth of bitcoins are coming your way, just for posting this video. It was worth it :) Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Pangia on April 24, 2013, 10:57:25 AM It's perhaps better for me to silently focus on my work and deliver something good for Bitcoin that doesn't require much trust. My reputation is pretty much ruined in this community regardless of how much evidence I bring to the table. (It's easy to blame people.) You can help your reputation by doing a Q&A session on Ustream or even simply posting a long YouTube video. What will be your excuse for that? Don't know how to use YouTube? Don't have webcamera? Don't have mobile phone? Or that it "won't prove anything"? Maybe it won't, but it's a good start if you really want to improve your reputation. Instead, what I see is that you cherry pick posts to answer and ignore posts that are not so easy to answer. +++1 Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Inedible on April 24, 2013, 12:08:07 PM That's a nice start. You've just got some partial credibility in my book now. lol - I'm sure he'll be over the moon to hear that ;) Of course, there is still a chance that your dad does all the writing and you only do "public appearances", but that sounds like a crazy conspiracy theory... :) Did I not say it wouldn't change a thing? ;D Maybe you are who you claim to be, and there indeed exists that relic millionaire collector. Crazy things happen in life. Once in a while you see a movie about some incredible story that actually did happen. Now you've swung too far the other way lol Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: zhoutong on April 24, 2013, 12:09:47 PM Neither. You just lost your bet. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=186261.0 Wait... What was your wager? I didn't (carefully :) ) make any specific wagers, but Ok, $5 worth of bitcoins are coming your way, just for posting this video. It was worth it :) Thanks for the coins. I really appreciate it and I promise will put it into good use, for Bitcoin. I did it mostly for entertainment though. I just don't have the habit of recording myself and sharing with everyone. If I ever launch another Bitcoin product, I will definitely be happy to do a Skype video interview with Bitcoin Magazine or whatever Bitcoin-related media. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: zhoutong on April 24, 2013, 12:11:23 PM Also, this article from The Business Times may be helpful:
http://www.businesstimes.com.sg/premium/top-stories/epic-spore-tale-bitcoinica-20130423 Most of the content is behind the paywall, but the excerpt is good enough to get an idea of my identity, at least. You are welcome. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Alex Zee on April 24, 2013, 12:18:27 PM Did I not say it wouldn't change a thing? ;D Well, my initial proposition was Ustream Q&A session precisely so we could "tap" his mighty brain in real time and make sure there's no other person :) But this video is a good start. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: bitclown on April 24, 2013, 12:35:42 PM Good job on the age distraction, everyone. The documented multi-million dollar thefts are back under the rug again.
Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Inedible on April 24, 2013, 12:43:42 PM Good job on the age distraction, everyone. The documented multi-million dollar thefts are back under the rug again. The age issue is definitely a distraction but not an intentional one. No need for pitchforks and torches yet ;D Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Alex Zee on April 24, 2013, 12:55:22 PM One thing I would say, if you are for real, Zhou, you picked a wrong company type to start over - domain registration requires twice as much trust.
First, to trust you with money and then to trust you with the domain name itself. And for purely online services, domain name is a crucial asset. So maybe you should start with something that involves tiny amounts of money and less trust. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: maomao on April 24, 2013, 01:10:03 PM I had a question that repentance had answered previously, but I wanted to get clarification. When AurumXChange locked up your funds (was it like $50,000?), you said they never gave it back (even to this day), but repentance said it wasn't your funds but your friends, so there is no way to get it back. Can you clarify? Honestly, I don't care about those funds or your friend, I just don't like the idea of MtGox, AurumXChange, etc jacking funds from people whenever they personally feel it's legitimate to do so (without any legal request to do so) and then never answering questions about it later. Where did that money even go? I was doing a LR->USD exchange for a Singapore friend (total $100K, and $30K in XMLGold, $40K in AurumXChange, and the rest OTC). He paid me $100K in LR and I paid my friend $100K in full (taking a huge loss), so the $40K should be mine. It's a transfer from my LR account to my bank account. It's never a third-party transfer like some other said. At that time, I told CJH (the Bitcoinica hacker) about AurumXChange's accusation (I had to tell). He decided to withhold $40K from the payment to Patrick Murck. I asked him not to, but he persisted. Later, he gave me a verified Alipay account with $40K equivalent in CNY. I didn't bother to touch the funds because AurumXChange was lying to me about their correspondence. (To date I still haven't received a single email from them, despite their false claims on the forum). Now CJH is gone (phone: powered off, QQ: offline, email: no response) and the Alipay account got its password changed (most likely by him after withdrawing the funds). So AurumXChange has succeeded in ripping off $40K by using the coincidence of Bitcoinica hack and my Singapore trip (I can even show anyone my passport stamps of leaving Australia during the hack, PM me). There was no AML investigation and I didn't receive anything. I allowed them to send to Bitcoinica because I felt it's better in Bitcoinica creditors' hands rather than theirs. No matter how they feel about whether it's an insider job or not (it's not), they have my full consent to send money to Bitcoinica. (Even if it's really an insider job, the money should also be sent to Bitcoinica, with or without my consent). But they clearly didn't do anything and kept the funds for themselves. I'm no longer mad at them but I still hope AurumXchange can do the right thing. I will take the reputation hit as a punishment for not choosing business partners carefully (the Bitcoinica Consultancy) and it's understandable that AurumXchange wanted to do good for the community by revealing suspects. EDIT WITH PROOF: Bitcoinica was hacked on July 13 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=93074.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=93074.0) Depart Australia: (Passport Number blocked off) https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/6936226/exit.jpg Enter Australia: (Passport Number blocked off) https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/6936226/entry.jpg Flight Ticket: (Frequent Flyer number and Ticket number blocked off) (Note that the original flight were oversold, so I travelled on the 14th of July instead of 13th.) https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/6936226/ticket.jpg Everything you say will be used in the court. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: NedKLee on April 24, 2013, 02:38:22 PM As an unbiased observer who has not got a dog in this fight, I would like to say that after watching the video, you won me mate, I admire your intestinal fortitude, good onya.
Perhaps quoting the ASX being up some 83 odd points was a bit cheeky considering they've just wiped 2.5 Billion USD off the American stock exchanges today, but you were not to know, these things really DO happen. Normally I'd be in Melbourne tomorrow, being Anzac Day, we have a little reunion at the Great Western Hotel in Spencer street, this time it's Sydney. Be that as it may, if you'd ever like the catch up for a feed in maybe little Bourke street or Lygon street Carlton, or wherever ,let me know, it would be my pleasure. Lest we Forget. Keith Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: BTCisthefuture on April 24, 2013, 05:47:22 PM I'm unbiased in all of this.
But his is waaaay too much drama for me to ever spend a single penny (or bitcoin for that matter) on any new business you may start. It's quite obvious you are very smart and talented and it seems like you are very blessed with the family you were born into to give you oppturnities most don't have. But at 18 years old I think it's pretty obvious you still have a lot to learn about reputation and TRUST in the business world. This is something you'll only learn with time though. Actually a little advice, you might want to hire a PR staff. Kids your age really shouldn't be giving full discolsures and talking about this and that, it really does just hurt your image and rep in the long run. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: bitcoinminer on April 24, 2013, 06:07:40 PM I'm unbiased in this whole matter. But I would never trust any of my money with a person or company with this type of track record. A lot of people lost a lot of money because of your service, and as far as I know you didn't fully repay most of them. You disappear for a year and now suddenly are back and expect everyone to trust you. On top of that, you're only 18 years old. I hate to sound harsh or mean, but I would never trust my money with someone like that, let a alone a child. Best of luck to you though, I don't know you personally so I can't say anything about you personally. All I can comment on is the service that you ran and what happened with that service and how it impacted a lot of people in the bitcoin community. +1 Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: tiktoc on April 24, 2013, 08:54:17 PM Does not really effect me either way, but why does the passport stamp say 15th July and the original flight details say the arrival is on the 14th? If the stamp says the 15th would have meant you left on the 14th on a late flight or a early flight on the 15th july. Means you changed your flight to a day later and you were not travelling when the hack occurred?
Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: World on April 24, 2013, 11:58:29 PM Very few people have met me so far, but I'm going to be more open as part of the "comeback". I'll try to attend as many Bitcoiner events as possible. Welcome back, Zhou.What about attending this conference? http://www.bitcoin2013.com/bitcoin-2013-panelists.html Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: QuestionAuthority on April 25, 2013, 02:34:49 AM Bitcoin is so full of lol. I love this thread.
Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: zhoutong on April 25, 2013, 02:47:43 AM Very few people have met me so far, but I'm going to be more open as part of the "comeback". I'll try to attend as many Bitcoiner events as possible. Welcome back, Zhou.What about attending this conference? http://www.bitcoin2013.com/bitcoin-2013-panelists.html I'll travel to the United States in July. But this event is in May. So I can't attend. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: QuestionAuthority on April 25, 2013, 05:22:59 AM Very few people have met me so far, but I'm going to be more open as part of the "comeback". I'll try to attend as many Bitcoiner events as possible. Welcome back, Zhou.What about attending this conference? http://www.bitcoin2013.com/bitcoin-2013-panelists.html I'll travel to the United States in July. But this event is in May. So I can't attend. Too bad! Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: repentance on April 25, 2013, 05:42:04 AM Bitcoin is so full of lol. I love this thread. pirate's return will be even lulzier. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Matthew N. Wright on April 25, 2013, 06:09:04 AM Bitcoin is so full of lol. I love this thread. pirate's return will be even lulzier. "Hai gaiz. I need some donations for a legal fund to defend myself from the state taking away my belongings! Don't let me down fellow libertarians!" Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: zebedee on April 25, 2013, 07:12:37 AM 14+ is allowed to fly unaccompanied internationally. Some airlines might require a signed waiver from a parent. Over 6's are allowed to fly unaccompanied internationally. Speaking from experience.Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: repentance on April 25, 2013, 08:07:08 AM 14+ is allowed to fly unaccompanied internationally. Some airlines might require a signed waiver from a parent. Over 6's are allowed to fly unaccompanied internationally. Speaking from experience.Different rules apply depending on the age of the child. Generally speaking, children under 6 must be accompanied by someone 15 or over. Children between 6 and 12 must be registered as unaccompanied minors with the airline and this places restrictions on connecting flights as well as ensuring that staff (including ground staff) keep an eye on them, escort them to and from the aircraft, through customs, etc. Children between 12 and 15 can fly as unaccompanied minors at the request of their parents, but that status isn't given unless requested. Children 15 and over have no special status. Interestingly enough, if you're on the same flight as your children but in a different seating class, your children are regarded as unaccompanied minors by airlines which means you need to pay adult fare for them. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: bitclown on April 25, 2013, 09:11:03 AM The flight tickets, like the age, and like the passport, are just distractions from the real issue. Some of Bitcoin's most prolific scammers made no attempts to hide their true identity. One shouldn't automatically trust someone just because they put their face on YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqpX4Wxlnbs#t=48s), writes impressive code (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=30646.0) or arranges a meetup in Las Vegas (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=91252.0).
Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: sgravina on April 25, 2013, 09:59:38 AM Being 18 is awesome. Congratulations. I had my first sex when I was 18. I've had sex almost 2000 times since and it is still awesome.
I was a lot smarter when I was 18. My body could jump higher and didn't hurt all the time. I look at being 18 as a kind of superpower. Enjoy it. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: Justin00 on April 25, 2013, 04:32:34 PM Serious question (I'm going some where with this..)
Does the "relic collector hacker" read / write English fluently ? Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: defxor on April 25, 2013, 05:07:08 PM Tihan has met Zhou. Gavin has met Tihan. That much has been known since the Bitcoinica fiasco.
That does not change the fact that the explanation that fits all known facts and requires no leaps of faith (or unicorns) when it comes to who made off with Bitcoinica's money, times two - maybe three, is Zhou and Zhou alone. Quoting a post from way back: This tells a lot about your attitude. I hope it is a hindsight and you didn't assume Bitcoinica to be a scammer's product when it was launched. tl;dr: The road to hell is paved with good intentions. I'm quite sure you launched Bitcoinica with the intention for it to provide value to the community. As initially suggested by Patrick/Intersango and others, your claims about trade volume were very suspicious. It's likely you simply exaggerated them, not unusual when being proud of what you've created. Whether the Linode theft (where other accounts as well were swiped) just provided an excuse for some profit on the side or not I don't know, but I'm quite sure the only real money to have come out of running Bitcoinica were from user deposits. I have no personal opinion of whether it operated as a pure bucket shop or not, but others have documented the lack of visible MtGox movement even when Bitcoinica should've been hedging. When, based on how you presented the success of Bitcoinica in public, you were approached with investment offers I believe you were simply unable to admit that it wasn't as successful as you claimed. I believe you went along way too far with whatever happened, and that the Rackspace "hack" was the simplest way out when Tihan started questioning the books. Additionally, it provided yet more profit which you might've needed to be able to keep up appearances with your friends and family. After the very visible and complete failure by the Intersango people to handle the resulting mess I believe you made yet another profitable "hack" on the service. It wasn't as well planned nor executed as the previous, maybe it was simply opportunistic after having realized the release of the source code provided the excuse needed. I've posted links to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudologia_fantastica and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance since I do believe they apply. I think you're currently unable to admit to yourself and people close to you where things went wrong, and you're still hoping to be able to exit this unscathed. (I consider the above to be the simplest explanation possible that still fits all the known facts. I'm wary about the exact involvement by Amir, Patrick and Donald though - and since Tihan and Zhou supposedly have met in person it would be interesting to know exactly whom else have actually met either of them.*) But then, the only reason I really care is that if people's only takeaway from having joined the Bitcoin community is that they get constantly scammed this will never fly. I thus believe Bitcoin fraud needs to be handled by the proper legal authorities. We're way past Mybitcoin's "as long as I give 49% back you guys won't hurt me, right?" - which btw looks suspiciously close to what you're currently trying to do as well. *) Edit: Tihan's identity is verified by an upstanding member of the community, and thus Zhou's should be as well. For those who don't remember, chat logs were posted where Tihan was questioning why the business they bought didn't make the money Zhou had claimed it did. That provides much of the rationale for what then happened. Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: akipfer on April 25, 2013, 05:16:17 PM It has been exactly 345 days since I left Bitcoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=81581.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=81581.0)). Nothing really has changed, except the soaring prices (it doesn't have a lot to do with me other than seeing my out-of-pocket 5,000 BTC personal compensation is valued at >$1 million at peak, that was over 80% of my entire Bitcoin savings and I didn't purchase more after the incident). Bitcoinica LP is still not liquidated with zero progress of the fund return. In fact, I have been following the forum for some time (I changed my forum account password to resist my temptation to login again). I have been searching my name every 9 days ever since I logged out last time. When I left Bitcoin, I felt that I was not adding value to the economy by developing Bitcoinica because speculation is a zero-sum game. But now after seeing speculative activity sky-rocketing without a viable solution to short Bitcoin: I'm feeling a bit regretful that I sold Bitcoinica. Without selling Bitcoinica, the Linode hack would still happen, but the platform can still survive with the profits it generated. There wouldn't be the Rackspace hack or the Mt. Gox hack because the email server wouldn't be compromised and the source code wouldn't be leaked by an insider. The platform might still be around to serve Bitcoiners by maintaining the price stability more effectively than a single long-only exchange. But that's daydream. I'm not going to start another Bitcoin exchange. Bitcoin is not just a speculative vehicle. It's the first currency/commodity/whatever with both 1) strictly limited quantities and 2) native mechanism to be transmitted over data networks. We desperately need killer apps that make Bitcoin a truly global alternative currency that replaces some of the functions of the traditional banking system. (Note that I'm not so ambitious that Bitcoin will replace fiat currencies. I think it's more beneficial to the world economy by being a parallel/alternative currency, like gold. This is just an opinion, though.) The Bitcoin community has given me nightmares (mainly the reputation hit) but I'm never giving up on Bitcoin. True believers are going to be believers forever. I don't really have any clear ideas at the moment, but I'll be more than happy to build a killer app for Bitcoin from stratch. If you have any thoughts, feel free to PM me or email me at bitcointalk@zhoutong.com. I'm also answering any questions you have in this thread. I really hope that I can provide valuable service to the community and regain the lost trust/reputation by building something really useful. PS> Despite my repeated clarifications, I want to say the same thing again: As I had no financial interest in Bitcoinica LP after early 2012, I had no savings that were owed or distributable to Bitcoinica creditors other than the 5000 BTC compensation out of my personal funds. As I was neither the director nor an owner of any Bitcoinica-related entity since then, I had no power to do anything to help the creditors. I know a lot of people are being hurt by the incident. So is me. I really hope that my previous compensation was valuable and useful to the people being hurt. 5000 BTC at peak Bitcoin price was several multiples of Bitcoinica's sale price but I had no regret for doing something I could to help people in need. Why don't u make a trader, like 'mercadolivre.com.br' where the trader, don't keep the entirely money(btc/ltc/nvc whatever is it) is just buy and sell it to anynone, try to understand how mercadolivre.com.br works....if u understand, u will notice why im saying this... just in case, if the trader website get hacked, all saving(almost, if not all) will be gone(stolen). if only keep the digital currency while selling/buying, there is no such thing as that. did u see where im going with this? also there is no BTC IS $x price, anyone buy/sell at his own price(cause MtgoX is good, but if it fall, IT FALLS, and as always, we (all other coins) FALL TOGETHER like an excrement falling from an airplane(tbbt quote ;d ) Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: bitcoinminer on April 25, 2013, 05:25:41 PM Getting GOXXXED or Zhonged is what BitCoin is all about. You bring in new people, get them interested, and then crush all of their hopes and dreams.
It's sort of like being a Jehovah's Witness - you have to recruit new members :) I only partially blame the scammers. I view BitCoin as gambling, even if others dont. I took a gamble with about 50 BTC having someone develop a site for me a year and a half ago. It was only a couple of hundred bucks then, and of course they worked on it for awhile, then just disappeared. Now, it's worth a few thousand and I'm a little irritated, but oh well. That's the risk you take. I'm working on some solutions behind the scenes to increase trust and accountability in the community. Stay tuned over the next few months :) Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: gollum on April 25, 2013, 09:53:58 PM Zhoutong - Send me a PM if you are interested in partnership for bitcoin projects.
Title: Re: I'm back! Post by: repentance on April 25, 2013, 10:16:35 PM Tihan has met Zhou. Gavin has met Tihan. That much has been known since the Bitcoinica fiasco. That does not change the fact that the explanation that fits all known facts and requires no leaps of faith (or unicorns) when it comes to who made off with Bitcoinica's money, times two - maybe three, is Zhou and Zhou alone. Quoting a post from way back: This tells a lot about your attitude. I hope it is a hindsight and you didn't assume Bitcoinica to be a scammer's product when it was launched. tl;dr: The road to hell is paved with good intentions. I'm quite sure you launched Bitcoinica with the intention for it to provide value to the community. As initially suggested by Patrick/Intersango and others, your claims about trade volume were very suspicious. It's likely you simply exaggerated them, not unusual when being proud of what you've created. Whether the Linode theft (where other accounts as well were swiped) just provided an excuse for some profit on the side or not I don't know, but I'm quite sure the only real money to have come out of running Bitcoinica were from user deposits. I have no personal opinion of whether it operated as a pure bucket shop or not, but others have documented the lack of visible MtGox movement even when Bitcoinica should've been hedging. When, based on how you presented the success of Bitcoinica in public, you were approached with investment offers I believe you were simply unable to admit that it wasn't as successful as you claimed. I believe you went along way too far with whatever happened, and that the Rackspace "hack" was the simplest way out when Tihan started questioning the books. Additionally, it provided yet more profit which you might've needed to be able to keep up appearances with your friends and family. After the very visible and complete failure by the Intersango people to handle the resulting mess I believe you made yet another profitable "hack" on the service. It wasn't as well planned nor executed as the previous, maybe it was simply opportunistic after having realized the release of the source code provided the excuse needed. I've posted links to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudologia_fantastica and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance since I do believe they apply. I think you're currently unable to admit to yourself and people close to you where things went wrong, and you're still hoping to be able to exit this unscathed. (I consider the above to be the simplest explanation possible that still fits all the known facts. I'm wary about the exact involvement by Amir, Patrick and Donald though - and since Tihan and Zhou supposedly have met in person it would be interesting to know exactly whom else have actually met either of them.*) But then, the only reason I really care is that if people's only takeaway from having joined the Bitcoin community is that they get constantly scammed this will never fly. I thus believe Bitcoin fraud needs to be handled by the proper legal authorities. We're way past Mybitcoin's "as long as I give 49% back you guys won't hurt me, right?" - which btw looks suspiciously close to what you're currently trying to do as well. *) Edit: Tihan's identity is verified by an upstanding member of the community, and thus Zhou's should be as well. For those who don't remember, chat logs were posted where Tihan was questioning why the business they bought didn't make the money Zhou had claimed it did. That provides much of the rationale for what then happened. Additionally, we know from Zhou's own posts that Zhou was allowed to retain all profits from Bitcoinica for several months after it was acquired by Wendon. He was then paid between $8000 and $10,000 per month to run Bitcoinica prior to the Intersango guys coming on board (Bitcoinica was already "leaking equity" during this time). From documents made public by Amir, we know that following the Intersango guys coming onboard, Tihan asked Zhou not to take any further payments from Bitcoinica until the financial clusterfuck was sorted out - the Intersango guys had already agreed that they would take no payments at that time. The Intersango guys coming onboard had a significant impact on Zhou's status within the organisation as well as the financial benefits he received from Bitcoinica. Let's also remember that Zhou posted about changes made to the LastPass account after he'd resigned as an employee - changes he knew about because he'd tried to access it. Zhou never played well with the Intersango guys and in my opinion he undermined them at every opportunity. Whether he believed that if enough things went wrong he'd be put back in charge or whether he preferred to see Bitcoinica destroyed rather than under the control of others is debatable, but Zhou's ego played an enormous part in the downfall of Bitcoinica. It's kind of horrifying that if AurumXchange had not made public the connection between the MtGox intrusion and Zhou's accounts, people would be unaware of it to this day and there may have been no recovery of any funds from that intrusion. Recovery or not, it still stinks to high heaven that there's been no criminal investigation of that event. When that connection was established, all of the Bitcoinica hacks should have been made the subject of a criminal investigation. That Zhou actually asked people not to involve the police because it might affect the likelihood of DImmi approving his application just confirms the extent to which he acts out of self-interest. Zhou has the self-centred teenager view that it doesn't really matter what happened because most of the funds from the MtGox intrusion were recovered. It does matter, though, because the lion's share of the blame for the failure of Bitcoinica is being placed on others and the MtGox intrusion was what made a difficult situation irretrievable. |