Bitcoin Forum

Bitcoin => Group buys => Topic started by: Kernel32 on June 02, 2013, 02:34:14 PM



Title: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: Kernel32 on June 02, 2013, 02:34:14 PM
LAST UPDATE:
The negotiations failed miserably on one crucial aspect. Josh DID NOT allow us to TEST chips before ESCROW release.
I call this project a success on finding the most probable point of BFL selling chips. It is very much possible, they just want to get rid of third quality chips and make some money on the side. Than blame all of it on community devs.
PROJECT CLOSED. BIG THANK TO ALL INVOLVED!

65 nm efficient BFL chips Group Buy under the conditions:

- BFL delives sample chips and datasheets to board developers on time previously agreed on. (two weeks- pending)

- BFL delives ordered chips in quality and on time previously agreed on. (100 days - accepted)

- They don't get the money if they don't deliver ON TIME. (100% ESCROW by John K. - accepted)

UPDATE 1: Josh/BFL accepted our escrow offer [June 06]

STATUS: GB not open yet, Refining deal with Josh, discussing board development options with burnin, Chris/BkkCoins (Klondike), allten and other community developers


We have now three lead community developers - burnin, Chris (Klondike) and allten - considering BFL chip board. Under some conditions of course. We may have the power to make this happen. (Or not.)



Random selection of BFL chips will be put trough hash test previous to ESCROW release. My Group Buyers either get quality on time or money back from John K. I know the idea of actually recieving a BFL product seems ridiculous, but two days ago a lot of people laughed at me about 100% escrow with BFL. The approach used now is different. No upfront, no shit policy.
Remember BFL needs the community to produce a mining board or they won't sell ... a single chip.[/b]

Original message by Josh:
Quote
Butterfly Labs will begin selling bulk chips to individuals and companies starting in June, 2013. Chip delivery schedule is approximately 100 days through end packaging once your order is placed. We will be providing reference documentation, reference design/schematics, and foundry receipt/documentation.

Grade A chips have 16 engines and will do 250 MHz comfortably, equating to 4 GH/s per chip.

Chips will be graded and priced as follows:

Grade A: 16 Engines - $97/chip
Grade B: 15 Engines - $93/chip
Grade C: 14 Engines - $89/chip

Grade D: 13 Engines or less - $83/chip

Our chips will be provided in minimum lots of 100 with the following price structure:

100 - 999 chips - Regular Price
1000 - 9999 chips - 5% discount
10,000 - 99,999 chips - 10% discount
100,000 or more - 20% discount

Chip orders will require 50% down and 50% upon order delivery. Payment can be made via BTC (preferred) or bank wire.

Advantages of BFL chips:

1/2 the power usage per GH as the closest competitor
1/10th the silicon area per GH as the closest competitor (Very high performance density)
You can use off the shelf heat sinks depending on your chip layout due to FCBGA package vs custom underside heat sinks as required on some QFN packages. You don't have to design and manufacture heat sinks!
Proven design currently operating in the field and ready to go.


Funds would be probably gathered in BTC as order takes place and incrased/decrased based on BTC to dollar fluctuation before hand-to-hand payment. No cost (full refund) bailout.

Let me know what do you think. I can try to negotiate our terms of deal if there is enough willing people behind me.

EDIT 1: I described the situation and conditions to BFL sales. Awaiting reply.

Quote
Greetings Butterfly Labs,

I represent some of the BitcoinTalk.org community members willing to buy your ASIC chips. There is demand and I expect a significant order if we manage to agree on some basic business terms.

We would like you to guarantee delivery date both sites agree on. 100 days for example with a small reserve for unexpected events. To make sure no other delays occur, John K. is willing to 100% escrow the transaction.

You can present your attitude to such conditions and propose your own to the community as email reply or directly by posting in the BFL Chips Group Buy Thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=223571

Thank you very much,
Kernel32
BitcoinTalk.org community member

EDIT 2: Josh/BFL agreed.

EDIT 3: Awaiting another reply to following proposal:


Quote
Hi Josh,

Thank you for your answer.

John K. already expressed his good will to do the escrow.

Where I can't get you any hard number on how many chips we will buy, it's certain that the community is willing to invest a lot in this.

To get the most interesting deal possible and all of the potential/undecided costumers involved, you could give them some guarantees, that way they can put any doubts behind. Could we agree on random chip selection hash test attended by our representative before escrow release? Community based board development is also a very good motivation. Are you able to arrange sample chips (even with only some cores working) and chip documentation delivery to (2-3) community lead developers in let's say two weeks?

As the the number of chips could be pretty high, let me please know what proportions of grade A, B, C .. chips are most beneficial for your company.

Thank you Josh,
Kernel32
BitcoinTalk.org community member


Title: Re: BFL chips group buy #1 - survey
Post by: loshia on June 02, 2013, 02:38:51 PM
No No and No

Come on dude are you joking?  BFL is joke that is all. I will trow my money in garbage but i will never buy a nut from BFL even it is in stock and it ships on next day

That is my opinion

Best luck to all of BFL customers though




Title: Re: BFL chips group buy #1 - survey
Post by: Kernel32 on June 02, 2013, 02:41:09 PM
No No and No

Come on dude are you joking?  BFL is joke that is all. I will trow my money in garbage but i will never buy a nut from BFL

That is my opinion

Best luck to all of BFL customers though

You are very right, that's why I intend to use money as leverage and don't give them a penny on preorder. (Other people did >> Horrible failure)

They could accept this if they are in need of money and board manufacturing is the real bottleneck.


Title: Re: BFL chips group buy #1 - survey
Post by: loshia on June 02, 2013, 02:44:54 PM
No No and No

Come on dude are you joking?  BFL is joke that is all. I will trow my money in garbage but i will never buy a nut from BFL

That is my opinion

Best luck to all of BFL customers though

You are very right, that's why I'm intending to use money as leverage and don't give them a penny on preorder. (As other people did.)

They could accept this if they are in need of money and board manufacturing is the bottleneck.

Dude,

They do not have a working (shipped) product yet. what chips are they selling? I do think that there are a lot of crazy people who will trow again millions on that venture and it will be about time for BFL to disappear completely and forever!



Title: Re: BFL chips group buy #1 - survey
Post by: jspielberg on June 02, 2013, 02:45:32 PM
I guess I don't understand how this would work...

You would collect the full chip cost and pay BFL half (since they need 1/2 up front for an order), and  the remaining half would be in escrow?
Then if they don't deliver in 100 days... the 1/2 that is in escrow will be returned to the people in the group buy?

Or are you saying you would wait for other people's orders to ship in 100 days... and then if they do... then you will put in a full order so you would be 200 days out (Dec. 19th)?

I must be missing something as neither of those sounds that appealing


Title: Re: BFL chips group buy #1 - survey
Post by: Kernel32 on June 02, 2013, 02:47:19 PM
You would collect the full chip cost and pay BFL half (since they need 1/2 up front for an order), and  the remaining half would be in escrow?

No, giving money to BFL is same as throwing them away. Full hand-to-hand business is the only way with BFL. No upfront.

We are not sheep, we are the costumers and we make the rules. That's economy 101.


Title: Re: BFL chips group buy #1
Post by: Kernel32 on June 02, 2013, 02:51:30 PM
BFL don't make chips as far as i know. So what are you looking to buy from them?
They announced chip sales. https://forums.butterflylabs.com/announcements/3014-butterfly-labs-announces-bulk-chip-sales.html
i wouldnt trust them for a dime.
I wouldn't either.


Title: Re: BFL chips group buy #1 - survey
Post by: jspielberg on June 02, 2013, 02:52:48 PM
You would collect the full chip cost and pay BFL half (since they need 1/2 up front for an order), and  the remaining half would be in escrow?

No, giving money to BFL is same as throwing them away. Full hand-to-hand business is the only way with BFL. No upfront.

We are not sheep, we are the costumers and we make the rules. That's economy 101.


I guess this hypothetical is really geared to ask BFL... They have stated that the terms of the chip purchase is 1/2 up front.

Best to ask on the BFL forum rather than here.  My guess is that they won't be interested in your offer.

My guess is that this line of investigation is a big waste of time (like most BFL threads/discussions).


Title: Re: BFL chips group buy #1 - survey
Post by: Kernel32 on June 02, 2013, 02:55:21 PM
I guess this hypothetical is really geared to ask BFL... They have stated that the terms of the chip purchase is 1/2 up front.

Best to ask on the BFL forum rather than here.  My guess is that they won't be interested in your offer.

My guess is that this line of investigation is a big waste of time (like most BFL threads/discussions).

You are possibly (90%) right. But it is worth a shot.

If there will be people throwing money at them, it is hopeless (100%) .


Title: Re: BFL chips group buy #1
Post by: driksson on June 02, 2013, 02:59:17 PM
if chips is what you want, look for avalon group buys, there's a few already shipped here on the forum.
They have at least delivered in the past, and seems to be trusted. (around 300mhash per chip, and 16 chips per board).


Title: Re: BFL chips group buy #1
Post by: Bitcoinorama on June 02, 2013, 03:01:54 PM
if chips is what you want, look for avalon group buys, there's a few already shipped here on the forum.
They have at least delivered in the past, and seems to be trusted. (around 300mhash per chip, and 16 chips per board).

None have shipped, as of last week all monies were still sitting in Bitsyncom's chip buying wallet = ~ 760,000 Avalon chips at Bitsyncom's pricing.


Title: Re: BFL chips group buy #1
Post by: Kernel32 on June 02, 2013, 03:05:05 PM
if chips is what you want, look for avalon group buys, there's a few already shipped here on the forum.
They have at least delivered in the past, and seems to be trusted. (around 300mhash per chip, and 16 chips per board).
Check. I'm going for Burnin's 20 boards. ;)

I described the situation and conditions to BFL sales. Awaiting reply.






Title: Re: BFL chips group buy #1
Post by: driksson on June 02, 2013, 03:05:33 PM
if chips is what you want, look for avalon group buys, there's a few already shipped here on the forum.
They have at least delivered in the past, and seems to be trusted. (around 300mhash per chip, and 16 chips per board).

None have shipped, as of last week all monies were still sitting in Bitsyncom's chip buying wallet = ~ 760,000 Avalon chips at Bitsyncom's pricing.

aha. thanks. but BFL selling chips at this stage, potentially providing more difficulty ahead of people ordering products a year ago is horrible.
I doubt they will send a single chip. And do they really do their own?


Title: Re: BFL chips group buy #1
Post by: Zubilica on June 02, 2013, 03:07:25 PM
    
Quote
Re: BFL Group Buy[ANY GRADE]
Today at 04:04:57 AM
   
Reply with quote  #12
Just FYI, I'm still skeptical of whether I should escrow BFL chip group buys. :/ I would prefer that the chips were somewhat more confirmed before even starting this as given their track record, 100 days could easily turn into 1000 days... (and I'll need to hold the coins for god knows how long Shocked)

John (John K.)

This

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=223005.msg2345713#msg2345713

If there is a change of heart from John K. i may throw a few satoshi.


Title: Re: BFL chips group buy #1
Post by: Kernel32 on June 02, 2013, 03:07:43 PM
.......
I doubt they will send a single chip. And do they really do their own?
They outsource for sure, but there is most likely a contract that would prevent us to go straight to source.

   
Quote
Re: BFL Group Buy[ANY GRADE]
Today at 04:04:57 AM
   
....100 days could easily turn into 1000 days....

John (John K.)
They don't deliver in  <= 100 days - deal is off, good bye. That's the only way with them. No eternal waiting and crappile of excuses.

According to what we know, they have the chips (and possibility to order them as they go), but have problems manufacturing the boards.


Title: Re: BFL chips group buy #1
Post by: Bitcoinorama on June 02, 2013, 03:19:46 PM
.......
I doubt they will send a single chip. And do they really do their own?
They outsource for sure, but there is most likely a contract that would prevent us to go straight to source.

   
Quote
Re: BFL Group Buy[ANY GRADE]
Today at 04:04:57 AM
   
....100 days could easily turn into 1000 days....

John (John K.)
They don't deliver in  <= 100 days - deal is off, good bye. That's the only way with them. No eternal waiting and crappile of excuses.

According to what we know, they have the chips, but have problems manufacturing the boards.


You know if John K chooses to honour such purchases from BFL they could be dead in the water. They need community assistance on this.

I can't see them convincing DIYers any other way, aside direct credit card payment.


Title: Re: BFL chips group buy #1
Post by: Kernel32 on June 02, 2013, 03:29:32 PM
You know if John K chooses to honour such purchases from BFL they could be dead in the water. They need community assistance on this.

I can't see them convincing DIYers any other way, aside direct credit card payment.
John K's escrow would be the optimal way to go. If BFL don't accept, the fish stinks and we know what's going on (again  >:().

I don't want to bother John too much just yet. We'll see what the BFL reply will be. If any.  ;)


Title: Re: BFL chips group buy #1
Post by: megvon on June 02, 2013, 04:15:26 PM
another butterfly scheme, orders not deliver but want to sell chip


Title: Re: BFL chips group buy #1
Post by: Bicknellski on June 02, 2013, 04:16:41 PM
Scam. More money for BFL and 0 delivery... one more person to ignore and one more thread to ignore.


Title: Re: BFL chips group buy #1
Post by: whisper on June 02, 2013, 04:25:53 PM
I thing First they must fill all orders and after selling chips! This is not fair, this is not right...


Title: Re: BFL chips group buy #1
Post by: Bitcoinorama on June 02, 2013, 04:33:56 PM
I thing First they must fill all orders and after selling chips! This is not fair, this is not right...

Dude sorry to break it to you, but they are either doing this because;

1. They need to fund continued development of your pre-orders after months of set backs.
2. They aren't capable of developing your pre-orders and need to open source solutions.
3. They no longer want to develop your pre-orders.

I suggested 2. last week on this forum and I think it's the best route for them personally.


Title: Re: BFL chips group buy #1
Post by: Exoskeleton on June 02, 2013, 04:51:42 PM
I would never sink a penny into this idea for 100 reasons Im not going to bother to list. Im not sure why you think BFL will reserve chips for us with zero upfront payment to them. I don't know how you think your going to convince them to go along.

What do you think the chances are they will deliver in under 100 days? I think your going to waste your time. They won't go for it and this whole thing is a total waste of time for everyone involved. And this whole escrow thing will just tie up everyones money. John K is ready to pass on this and I don't blame him one bit.


Title: Re: BFL chips group buy #1
Post by: Bitcoinorama on June 02, 2013, 04:55:55 PM
I would never sink a penny into this idea for 100 reasons Im not going to bother to list. Im not sure why you think BFL will reserve chips for us with zero upfront payment to them. I don't know how you think your going to convince them to go along.

What do you think the chances are they will deliver in under 100 days? I think your going to waste your time. They won't go for it and this whole thing is a total waste of time for everyone involved. And this whole escrow thing will just tie up everyones money. John K is ready to pass on this and I don't blame him one bit.

You also need to consider the shady reasoning as to why this was announced on a Saturday afternoon...

Smacks of the corrupt BS Obama/US Gov does when he/they  wish the 'president' to sign a executive order on Christmas Day or over the weekend without objection. Actually means less grief come during the week when more people are around to voice protest. Let them digest it over a Saturday night and Sunday, surprise the rest come Monday, when it's old news...


Title: Re: BFL chips group buy #1
Post by: PuertoLibre on June 02, 2013, 04:58:08 PM
I wonder if this builds confidence in BFL pre-order customers or if that is like the last red sign before driving off a cliff?


Title: Re: BFL chips group buy #1
Post by: Kernel32 on June 02, 2013, 05:03:58 PM
Scam. More money for BFL and 0 delivery... one more person to ignore and one more thread to ignore.
I'm not giving BFL any money. Read at least the first post please.

I'm trying to relocate leverages as we are the costumers and we should make the rules. Not supplier.


What do you think the chances are they will deliver in under 100 days? I think your going to waste your time. They won't go for it and this whole thing is a total waste of time for everyone involved. And this whole escrow thing will just tie up everyones money. John K is ready to pass on this and I don't blame him one bit.

They like to waste time of customers that already paid. Why hurry? Let's change that and give them some motivation.

I wonder if this builds confidence in BFL pre-order customers or if that is like the last red sign before driving off a cliff?

I would be ****** as hell.  I have no big order pending at BFL. So I'm OK with the chips.

I thing First they must fill all orders and after selling chips! This is not fair, this is not right...

There are only a few things right about BFL.


Title: Re: BFL chips group buy #1
Post by: KS on June 02, 2013, 05:11:46 PM
Scam. More money for BFL and 0 delivery... one more person to ignore and one more thread to ignore.
I'm not giving BFL any money. Read at least the first post please.

I'm trying to relocate leverages as we are the costumers and we should make the rules. Not supplier.


What do you think the chances are they will deliver in under 100 days? I think your going to waste your time. They won't go for it and this whole thing is a total waste of time for everyone involved. And this whole escrow thing will just tie up everyones money. John K is ready to pass on this and I don't blame him one bit.

They like to waste time of customers that already paid. Why hurry? Let's change that.

Break a leg.


(just to make sure there is no language barrier, don't take offense plz, it's a positive reinforcement)


Title: Re: BFL chips group buy #1
Post by: Bitcoinorama on June 02, 2013, 05:13:35 PM
Scam. More money for BFL and 0 delivery... one more person to ignore and one more thread to ignore.
I'm not giving BFL any money. Read at least the first post please.

I'm trying to relocate leverages as we are the costumers and we should make the rules. Not supplier.


What do you think the chances are they will deliver in under 100 days? I think your going to waste your time. They won't go for it and this whole thing is a total waste of time for everyone involved. And this whole escrow thing will just tie up everyones money. John K is ready to pass on this and I don't blame him one bit.

They like to waste time of customers that already paid. Why hurry? Let's change that.

Break a leg.


(just to make sure there is no language barrier, don't take offense plz, it's a positive reinforcement)

Idiom meaning, "Good Luck" ;)


Title: Re: BFL chips group buy #1
Post by: Kernel32 on June 02, 2013, 05:13:45 PM
Thank you KS. Will do my best.


Title: Re: BFL chips group buy #1
Post by: KS on June 02, 2013, 05:14:47 PM
Scam. More money for BFL and 0 delivery... one more person to ignore and one more thread to ignore.
I'm not giving BFL any money. Read at least the first post please.

I'm trying to relocate leverages as we are the costumers and we should make the rules. Not supplier.


What do you think the chances are they will deliver in under 100 days? I think your going to waste your time. They won't go for it and this whole thing is a total waste of time for everyone involved. And this whole escrow thing will just tie up everyones money. John K is ready to pass on this and I don't blame him one bit.

They like to waste time of customers that already paid. Why hurry? Let's change that.

Break a leg.


(just to make sure there is no language barrier, don't take offense plz, it's a positive reinforcement)

Idiom meaning, "Good Luck" ;)

Don't jinx it! :)


Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW - Kernel32
Post by: RandyFolds on June 02, 2013, 05:36:06 PM
Holy fuck. The moneygrab has gone even bigger. Pure fucking madness to throw good money after bad.


Title: Re: BFL chips group buy #1 - survey
Post by: PuertoLibre on June 02, 2013, 05:41:30 PM
No No and No

Come on dude are you joking?  BFL is joke that is all. I will trow my money in garbage but i will never buy a nut from BFL

That is my opinion

Best luck to all of BFL customers though

You are very right, that's why I intend to use money as leverage and don't give them a penny on preorder. (Other people did >> Horrible failure)

They could accept this if they are in need of money and board manufacturing is the bottleneck.

You sir, are doing it right.

Though, I don't think BFL will accept your terms...unfortunately.

But you have my full hearted blessings.


Title: Re: BFL chips group buy #1 - survey
Post by: PuertoLibre on June 02, 2013, 05:42:59 PM
You would collect the full chip cost and pay BFL half (since they need 1/2 up front for an order), and  the remaining half would be in escrow?

No, giving money to BFL is same as throwing them away. Full hand-to-hand business is the only way with BFL. No upfront.

We are not sheep, we are the costumers and we make the rules. That's economy 101.

Give this guy the Trophy for BitCoinTalk 2013.

He got it right!


Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW - Kernel32
Post by: Kernel32 on June 02, 2013, 05:47:57 PM
I would never sink a penny into this idea for 100 reasons Im not going to bother to list. Im not sure why you think BFL will reserve chips for us with zero upfront payment to them. I don't know how you think your going to convince them to go along.

What do you think the chances are they will deliver in under 100 days? I think your going to waste your time. They won't go for it and this whole thing is a total waste of time for everyone involved. And this whole escrow thing will just tie up everyones money. John K is ready to pass on this and I don't blame him one bit.

*IF* BFL would accept the conditions, they would probably deliver. Why bother to negotiate in case they can't or plan not to. There is nothing for them in it (contrary to they'r 50% upfront scheme - what a joke).

Though, I don't think BFL will accept your terms...unfortunately.

The odds are not too high. I'm aware of it. But at least we can show them, we are not bunch of idiots to get scammed over and over.

But you have my full hearted blessings.

Appritiate it.


Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW - Kernel32
Post by: John (John K.) on June 02, 2013, 05:48:25 PM
I might be open to do this if there was a set period (say 1 month?) where BFL will have to release more proof on the issue like reference designs/chip examples etc, and a definite period where the escrow get released back to the buyers if BFL still does not ship. (say 100 days like they promised?)

Anyhow, I'm still waiting and watching this. I don't want people to get their coins tied up too long (and me increasing my risks of holding the coins even longer) if BFL keeps delaying. If anyone has a better idea of what's going on I'm all ears.  :)


Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: Kernel32 on June 02, 2013, 06:55:25 PM
I might be open to do this if there was a set period (say 1 month?) where BFL will have to release more proof on the issue like reference designs/chip examples etc, and a definite period where the escrow get released back to the buyers if BFL still does not ship. (say 100 days like they promised?)

Anyhow, I'm still waiting and watching this. I don't want people to get their coins tied up too long (and me increasing my risks of holding the coins even longer) if BFL keeps delaying. If anyone has a better idea of what's going on I'm all ears.  :)

Thank you for taking the time John.

I would maybe also add a condition of at least one capable board developer involved before any funds are collected. IF there is a reason to do so anyway. ;)


Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: Bitcoinorama on June 02, 2013, 07:07:15 PM
Look, one huuuge issue is the lead time in developing a valid PCB and working prototype, seeing as BFL haven't managed one to opensource themselves either...!

They'd need to be supplying advance chips to DIY board developers to make this work in their favour...

F**k they need to do that to complete their existing pre-orders anyway!!


Title: Re: BFL chips group buy #1
Post by: Bitcoinorama on June 02, 2013, 07:08:03 PM
Scam. More money for BFL and 0 delivery... one more person to ignore and one more thread to ignore.
I'm not giving BFL any money. Read at least the first post please.

I'm trying to relocate leverages as we are the costumers and we should make the rules. Not supplier.


What do you think the chances are they will deliver in under 100 days? I think your going to waste your time. They won't go for it and this whole thing is a total waste of time for everyone involved. And this whole escrow thing will just tie up everyones money. John K is ready to pass on this and I don't blame him one bit.

They like to waste time of customers that already paid. Why hurry? Let's change that.

Break a leg.


(just to make sure there is no language barrier, don't take offense plz, it's a positive reinforcement)

Idiom meaning, "Good Luck" ;)

Don't jinx it! :)

Unfortunately, that genuinely was my nickname at uni.

Jinx's can be positive as well though...;)


Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW - Kernel32
Post by: Exoskeleton on June 02, 2013, 07:12:06 PM
I might be open to do this if there was a set period (say 1 month?) where BFL will have to release more proof on the issue like reference designs/chip examples etc, and a definite period where the escrow get released back to the buyers if BFL still does not ship. (say 100 days like they promised?)

Anyhow, I'm still waiting and watching this. I don't want people to get their coins tied up too long (and me increasing my risks of holding the coins even longer) if BFL keeps delaying. If anyone has a better idea of what's going on I'm all ears.  :)

I guess what Im trying to say is that I don't think the conditions that you are outlining above will be met. They will want the 50% and there will be no way for us to know if they will refund it or not in 100 days time when we ask. I'll be following this issue as well and its nice of you to humor this idea however unlikley some of us think it is to happen.


Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: KGambler on June 02, 2013, 07:50:27 PM
I think there is no chance that BFL will agree to this - none at all. 

BFL is desperate for cash.  Even if BFL had enough on-hand capital to accept, some existing customers would be tempted to cancel their existing pre-orders and post up with the chip escrow instead.  This whole idea is the direct opposite of what BFL is trying to achieve.

Good luck though.


Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: Bicknellski on June 02, 2013, 07:56:03 PM
Just on principle. Why would any buy a BFL product? Simply a NO! Let them rot. This is how you repay them for all the lies and BS. You simply don't buy any more of their products. There is no win win here. Let them rot on the vine that is what they deserve. Let them fulfill their contractual obligations and everyone can move on to be better products coming out right now.


Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: KGambler on June 02, 2013, 08:01:23 PM
Just on principle. Why would any buy a BFL product? Simply a NO! Let them rot. This is how you repay them for all the lies and BS. You simply don't buy any more of their products. There is not win win here. Let them rot on the vine.

They are an extremely scummy company and have done many underhanded things, but people are not going to pass up a chance to acquire a money printing machine.  Will BFL ever ship in bulk?  Probably not - but if they do, they will have no shortage of customers.

My favorite BFL low-life scam tactic was the fake 1,000 BTC charity donation "gaurantee".


Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: a1phanumrc on June 02, 2013, 08:08:55 PM
My favorite BFL low-life scam tactic was the fake 1,000 BTC charity donation "gaurantee".

Yup. They will never see a BTC from me because of this (and the other BS).

I have Josh on record here stating BFL will honor the donation.

It's June. Who got it?


Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: smoothie on June 02, 2013, 08:14:36 PM
It is refreshing to see some people being smart and looking before they leap.

Unlike those June 2012 BFL preorder customers.


Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: jspielberg on June 02, 2013, 08:16:54 PM
I think there is no chance that BFL will agree to this - none at all. 

BFL is desperate for cash.  Even if BFL had enough on-hand capital to accept, some existing customers would be tempted to cancel their existing pre-orders and post up with the chip escrow instead.  This whole idea is the direct opposite of what BFL is trying to achieve.

Good luck though.

I tend to agree... I think BFL is on the ropes.

I speculate that if they weren't dying for cash they would have priced in BTC... but I think they need the cash and they need it now.

I would say there is no chance that BFL will accede to the demands of this buy for just 100 chips.  They would much rather put the risk on the customer and if they need the money, then it works against them to foot all the risk up front.

Best of luck though... you might get "lucky" and they agree.


Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: ecliptic on June 02, 2013, 08:17:52 PM
Just on principle. Why would any buy a BFL product? Simply a NO! Let them rot. This is how you repay them for all the lies and BS. You simply don't buy any more of their products. There is not win win here. Let them rot on the vine.

They are an extremely scummy company and have done many underhanded things, but people are not going to pass up a chance to acquire a money printing machine

Avalon is already selling chips though.


Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: PuertoLibre on June 02, 2013, 08:20:22 PM
I might be open to do this if there was a set period (say 1 month?) where BFL will have to release more proof on the issue like reference designs/chip examples etc, and a definite period where the escrow get released back to the buyers if BFL still does not ship. (say 100 days like they promised?)

Anyhow, I'm still waiting and watching this. I don't want people to get their coins tied up too long (and me increasing my risks of holding the coins even longer) if BFL keeps delaying. If anyone has a better idea of what's going on I'm all ears.  :)

Thank you for taking the time John.

I would maybe also add a condition of at least one capable board developer involved before any funds are collected. IF there is a reason to do so anyway. ;)

My God,

You are doing everything right! What the hell is wrong with all the other threads that they aren't seemingly even doing half of what you are doing...

I am gonna guess you are the "go to" place for the first BFL batch order. I don't see it happening in the other threads. (Well except maybe with MrTeal.)


Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: PuertoLibre on June 02, 2013, 08:22:55 PM
Look, one huuuge issue is the lead time in developing a valid PCB and working prototype, seeing as BFL haven't managed one to opensource themselves either...!

They'd need to be supplying advance chips to DIY board developers to make this work in their favour...

F**k they need to do that to complete their existing pre-orders anyway!!
Good idea, and this is something they can actually do right now.

See, there is always a silver lining if executed right.


Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: PuertoLibre on June 02, 2013, 08:29:21 PM

My favorite BFL low-life scam tactic was the fake 1,000 BTC charity donation "gaurantee".
I recall that, it really got under my skin.

Whats worse was BFL_Josh (Inaba) was letting people fight it out "over which charity" would be getting the winnings if they lost the bet.

All vapor, no substance.

He recently admitted on the BFL forums that they missed their power numbers. Plainly stated in no uncertain terms. The only question left is when the Mods and Admins are going to carry out the penalty. It's pretty black and white at this point.


Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: tvbcof on June 02, 2013, 08:49:52 PM
...
He recently admitted on the BFL forums that they missed their power numbers. Plainly stated in no uncertain terms. The only question left is when the Mods and Admins are going to carry out the penalty. It's pretty black and white at this point.

Don't hold your breath.

BFL is to bitcointalk.org as HSBC is the the US justice dept.

Not only bitcointalk.org, but the Bitcoin Foundation who provided BFL with a scamming platform at the 2013 conference.  Now if only they could put some resource into actually addressing frauds, thefts, and scams, that would be great.  Until then, they are pretty much as useless as tits on a boar hog in my opinion.

 edit: quoting.


Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: Kernel32 on June 02, 2013, 09:31:02 PM
Just on principle. Why would any buy a BFL product? Simply a NO! Let them rot. This is how you repay them for all the lies and BS. You simply don't buy any more of their products. There is no win win here. Let them rot on the vine that is what they deserve. Let them fulfill their contractual obligations and everyone can move on to be better products coming out right now.
A lot of people let BFL literally take they'r money away without any hard guarantees (inc. myself). Not every company would take advantage of those people. BFL did. Its about the managers in charge of the company and they'r decisions.

There is a theory, that only scammable people can be scammed. This is not completely true, but you can keep the chances to a minimum.

I'm trying to do real business where costumer has guarantees and get what was agreed on and paid for. That is completely new attitude.

We are not under stress nor vision of becoming filthy rich tomorrow (still would be OK if that is the case). Let's do it right this time.

90% our conditions will not be met. We had the balls to argue with butterflies. It could prevent somebody else getting scammed. >> I call that a win  ;)
9,9% we make it happen >> Epic win.
0,1% we get scammed by John K., THE government, board manufacturer or UFOs >> Epic fail.


Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: tvbcof on June 02, 2013, 09:35:55 PM
...
90% our conditions will not be met. We had the balls to argue with BFL. It could prevent somebody else getting scammed. >> I call that a win  ;)
9,9% we make it happen >> Epic win.
0,1% we get scammed by John K., THE government or UFOs >> Epic fail.

I'd call tying up one's money for something which is inflexible and poorly implemented and likely to be obsolete by the time it is delivered even if a miracle happened and it was delivered on time an Epic fail.



Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: Kernel32 on June 02, 2013, 09:37:28 PM
I'd call tying up one's money for something which is inflexible and poorly implemented and likely to be obsolete by the time it is delivered even if a miracle happened and it was delivered on time an Epic fail.

I agree with you. We don't want that to happen. (BFL costumers already know what you are talking about.)

EDIT: Remember BFL needs the community to produce a mining board or they won't sell ... a single chip.


Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: smoothie on June 02, 2013, 10:08:26 PM
I'd call tying up one's money for something which is inflexible and poorly implemented and likely to be obsolete by the time it is delivered even if a miracle happened and it was delivered on time an Epic fail.

I agree with you. We don't want that to happen. (BFL costumers already know what you are talking about.)

EDIT: Remember BFL needs the community to produce a mining board or they won't sell ... a single chip.


Perhaps that is what they are hoping?

lol "let's let the community come up with the board since we can't".



Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: Kernel32 on June 03, 2013, 06:43:56 AM

EDIT: Remember BFL needs the community to produce a mining board or they won't sell ... a single chip.


Perhaps that is what they are hoping?

lol "let's let the community come up with the board since we can't".

It seems that is the strategy of BFL. Or some combination of that and desire to make a quick buck plus the fact that BitSyncom (Avalon) sells they'r chips in vast quantities (dominates the market previously owned by butterflies).

They need the board and they need the costumers. What is there for us of it? Let's see.


I might be open to do this if there was a set period (say 1 month?) where BFL will have to release more proof on the issue like reference designs/chip examples etc, and a definite period where the escrow get released back to the buyers if BFL still does not ship. (say 100 days like they promised?)

Anyhow, I'm still waiting and watching this. I don't want people to get their coins tied up too long (and me increasing my risks of holding the coins even longer) if BFL keeps delaying. If anyone has a better idea of what's going on I'm all ears.  :)

Thank you for taking the time John.

I would maybe also add a condition of at least one capable board developer involved before any funds are collected. IF there is a reason to do so anyway. ;)

My God,

You are doing everything right! What the hell is wrong with all the other threads that they aren't seemingly even doing half of what you are doing...

I am gonna guess you are the "go to" place for the first BFL batch order. I don't see it happening in the other threads. (Well except maybe with MrTeal.)

Thank you for the support PuertoLibre.

The word is out there. BFL's turn now.


They can't stop the signal.


Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: GalaxyASIC on June 03, 2013, 06:57:28 AM
Where did you see that "BFL needs the community to produce a mining board or they won't sell ... a single chip." ?


Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: KS on June 03, 2013, 07:50:35 AM
Where did you see that "BFL needs the community to produce a mining board or they won't sell ... a single chip." ?

Stands to reason, they're not selling boards, so *someone* needs to make them. They can't sell chips if there aren't any boards to plug them in. Unless you're in the collector keychain business.


Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: Kernel32 on June 03, 2013, 08:12:42 AM
Where did you see that "BFL needs the community to produce a mining board or they won't sell ... a single chip." ?

It is possible someone will buy the chips without board development emerging, you are right. There is o lot of people, some are insane, some may know more than I do.

Stands to reason, they're not selling boards, so *someone* needs to make them. They can't sell chips if there aren't any boards to plug them in. Unless you're in the collector keychain business.

BFL will probably not find a corporation willing to take the risks of developing a board given the previous fail. (And risks of being accused of dealing with the devil himself, burned.  ;D )


Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: AsicBite on June 03, 2013, 09:45:34 AM
Hi I an new to BTC but I am researching it for the last week , here is the video on YT that I guess most of you saw , but I am wondering if this guy is somehow connected to BFL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vw7kVfJ5X5Y - Jalopeno teardown by codinginmydream
There is also other video showing Jalopeno in work.
My question is, is this a proof that BFL has developed a working board or this is just a scam , it seems legit to me?


Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: Kernel32 on June 03, 2013, 09:58:32 AM
Hi I an new to BTC but I am researching it for the last week , here is the video on YT that I guess most of you saw , but I am wondering if this guy is somehow connected to BFL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vw7kVfJ5X5Y - Jalopeno teardown by codinginmydream
There is also other video showing Jalopeno in work.
My question is, is this a proof that BFL has developed a working board or this is just a scam , it seems legit to me?


Hi. This might help you. http://bfl.ptz.ro/ It's a list of some people that received Jalapenos so far (and more unlucky ones still waiting to give you the whole disastrous picture - considering most people did not register in that form, this is HUGE ...). You can contact most of Jalapeno owners with further questions by PM. There is however no guarantee costumers and products delivered on the list are not fictional. Validation requires more research: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=222762.msg2344169#msg2344169

They (butterflies) sort of managed to scam people even if they deliver product at the (far away) end. Very creative.

Read more in PuertoLibre's signature above if curious how that is even possible.


Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: AsicBite on June 03, 2013, 10:09:39 AM
Hi I an new to BTC but I am researching it for the last week , here is the video on YT that I guess most of you saw , but I am wondering if this guy is somehow connected to BFL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vw7kVfJ5X5Y - Jalopeno teardown by codinginmydream
There is also other video showing Jalopeno in work.
My question is, is this a proof that BFL has developed a working board or this is just a scam , it seems legit to me?


Hi. This might help you. http://bfl.ptz.ro/ It's a list of some people that received Jalapenos so far (and more unlucky ones still waiting to give you the whole disastrous picture - considering most people did not register in that form this is HUGE). You can contact most of them with further questions by PM.

They (butterflies) sort of managed to scam people even if they deliver product at the (far away) end. Very creative.

Read more in PuertoLibre's signature above.

Thanks Kernel32 , what I understand is they have working boards , but they won't sell them, instead they need community to develop opens source boards.
As only few orders are delivered , they are just buying time to mine with already produced units , until Avalon chips started shipping at which time they can start shipping their products - IMHO , and they want to cash in more with BFL chips , hm if they take your proposition of escrow I will throw couple of BTC
Thanks for clarifying !


Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: Kernel32 on June 03, 2013, 10:43:00 AM
Thanks Kernel32 , what I understand is they have working boards , but they won't sell them, instead they need community to develop opens source boards.
As only few orders are delivered , they are just buying time to mine with already produced units , until Avalon chips started shipping at which time they can start shipping their products - IMHO , and they want to cash in more with BFL chips , hm if they take your proposition of escrow I will throw couple of BTC
Thanks for clarifying !

We cannot be sure, but this is our best guess of what's going on in BFL right now.

Thank you for your support AsicBite.


Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: MadHasher on June 03, 2013, 10:52:25 AM
Hi,

I would be interested if they accepted the escrow but they won't. They don't have the kind of money to put the orders in.

Still, if you get a positive reply back, count me in.

Best regards


Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: Serenata on June 03, 2013, 11:45:49 AM
...hand-to-hand payment...

What if BFL do deliver chips but:
  • They're not working?
  • Half of them are dead?
  • The reference desigh is bad?
  • Something else here...

Besides hand-in-hand trade, I'd recommend the payment to BFL being made after the chips are build into boards that work.


Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: Flying Hellfish on June 03, 2013, 11:58:29 AM
Where did you see that "BFL needs the community to produce a mining board or they won't sell ... a single chip." ?

Welcome back, it looks like you have been away for a couple months how is the 20nm mining chips coming along.

Sorry for the OT derail but I think new folks and people who forgot should be reminded.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=158044.0



Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: FatMagic on June 03, 2013, 12:52:42 PM
I am interested in this group buy when it comes up. Call me crazy, but I'm willing to bet on BFL for this one. Will watch this thread. Thanks Kernel.


Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: Noitev on June 03, 2013, 12:59:29 PM
I might throw money at this with reliable 100% guarantees/ escrow.


Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: YipYip on June 05, 2013, 03:41:29 AM
Had any response from BIG FUCKING LIES ...lol

Let me guess .ummm...umm..NO

..lol


Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: LazyOtto on June 05, 2013, 06:11:31 AM
Among other reasons I won't participate in this is that it seems Kernel32 can't communicate without shouting.

This thread is just too noisy for me to read.   :P


Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: Kernel32 on June 06, 2013, 04:42:36 PM
What if BFL do deliver chips but:
  • They're not working?
  • Half of them are dead?
  • The reference desigh is bad?
  • Something else here...
Besides hand-in-hand trade, I'd recommend the payment to BFL being made after the chips are build into boards that work.

This would be most likely solved by hash test of randomly selected chips on BFL reference long/short board before escrow release.

Community board developer(s) opinion(s) on the reference design are crucial to start the Groupbuy itself.


Among other reasons I won't participate in this is that it seems Kernel32 can't communicate without shouting.

This thread is just too noisy for me to read.   :P

Sorry if it seems that way to you. I do bold font only for easy visual recognition of my posts in thread started by myself. I wish there would be some better feature of this kind integrated in the forum engine.

Had any response from BIG FUCKING LIES ...lol

Let me guess .ummm...umm..NO

..lol

There is no response yet. They are most likely in no rush and wait for someone willing to take the 50% upfront "risk". All we can hope for is nobody this "eager" exists. For his sake.

Thank you for the support guys.


Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: Kernel32 on June 07, 2013, 02:10:42 AM
Good news everyone,

http://www.chooseomatic.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/farnsworth.jpg

we just got reply from Josh/BFL. They would accept our 100% escrow deal.


Quote
Hello,

For this particular instance, I would be willing to facilitate a 100% escrow with John K. for this transaction.  How many chips are you wanting and have you cleared this with John K. first?

Thanks,

Josh

At this point, we need to make sure board developers are willing, able and have the resources/datasheets/sample chips at the right time to get the advanced 65 nm BFL-based miners going and out there ASAP. I'll let you know what their opinions are.

If developers give us the green light, we'll refine the deal and open (in cooperation with John K) first batch orders.

Stay tuned.


Title: Re: Chips - BFL ASIC - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: Noitev on June 07, 2013, 02:13:52 AM
Sure. with john k, I'd put a couple thousand in. pm me when orders open up, I'd like to be first :P


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED] - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: Bicknellski on June 07, 2013, 03:48:23 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtVx26LlNXA <--- Yifu Guo of Avalon skeptical of Butterfly Labs


Why would anyone do that?


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED] - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: PeZ on June 07, 2013, 05:41:25 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtVx26LlNXA <--- Yifu Guo of Avalon skeptical of Butterfly Labs


Why would anyone do that?
It's funny how Yifu is your go-to-source for opinions when he is BFL's direct competitor. It's like asking Mcdonald's CEO what he thinks of the Whopper.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED] - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: wrenchmonkey on June 07, 2013, 05:52:06 AM
Interested, but only if there's a respected hardware developer (like burnin or BKKCoins who is willing to get on board with a design). I'm somewhat vested in BKK's Avalon design at this point, and would definitely be interested in his feedback regarding a BFL chip based project.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED] - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: PuertoLibre on June 07, 2013, 05:57:46 AM
@ Kernel32

Congrats on the negotiations. You are (IMO) the most viable thread regarding group buys for BFL. You deserve more than one round of applause. May the chips flow freely through your group buy. Good luck!


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED] - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: tvbcof on June 07, 2013, 06:09:30 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtVx26LlNXA <--- Yifu Guo of Avalon skeptical of Butterfly Labs

Why would anyone do that?
It's funny how Yifu is your go-to-source for opinions when he is BFL's direct competitor. It's like asking Mcdonald's CEO what he thinks of the Whopper.

Yifu seemed to have a fairly high opinion of ASICMINER.  I do also.  Their 130nm chips strikes me as the most impressive.  Avalon's 110nm second, and the supposedly 65nm one being pawned by BFL is either not 65nm, or is a steaming little piece of shit.  Or both.  I'd certainly be writing this into any escrow agreement although it doesn't actually matter exactly why it sucks so badly I suppose.

If BFL is going to go with 100% escrow, I would say there is a damn good chance that whatever they deliver would otherwise be thrown into the dumpster.



Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED] - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: wrenchmonkey on June 07, 2013, 06:29:41 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtVx26LlNXA <--- Yifu Guo of Avalon skeptical of Butterfly Labs

Why would anyone do that?
It's funny how Yifu is your go-to-source for opinions when he is BFL's direct competitor. It's like asking Mcdonald's CEO what he thinks of the Whopper.

Yifu seemed to have a fairly high opinion of ASICMINER.  I do also.  Their 130nm chips strikes me as the most impressive.  Avalon's 110nm second, and the supposedly 65nm one being pawned by BFL is either not 65nm, or is a steaming little piece of shit.  Or both.  I'd certainly be writing this into any escrow agreement although it doesn't actually matter exactly why it sucks so badly I suppose.

Not surprising, since ASICMiner doesn't pose a real threat to them in terms of market share. It's easy to be generous with a company that is no serious threat to your own. BFL's chip still consumes less than half the power of Avalon's, so if it's a steaming piece of shit, it's still better than Avalon's, and if it's not really 65nm, then it's REALLY showing Avalon up...

Quote
If BFL is going to go with 100% escrow, I would say there is a damn good chance that whatever they deliver would otherwise be thrown into the dumpster.

Based on WHAT (other than your obviously biased contempt for BFL)? You think BFL wants to further damage their reputation by sending out a bunch of non fuctional chips? LOL, the leaps you people will take to justify your BFL hate are incredible.  :D :D


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED] - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: ryanb on June 07, 2013, 06:43:50 AM
count me in once you start the group buy with guaranteed chip delivery not just a promise


Title: Re: BFL chips group buy #1
Post by: t13hydra on June 07, 2013, 06:46:26 AM
BFL don't make chips as far as i know. So what are you looking to buy from them?
Hm.. i see post now. interesting to start selling chips before selling complete products on wait since june last year.
i wouldnt trust them for a dime.
They do make devices and they have shipped too. Unfortunately they move with the speed of a snail on NOS. Noone trusts them and hell i wouldn't trust them even to hold my beer for a sec. I have thrown out $800 already and now waiting for a device to be shipped on the "40th of April"...
Anyway, good luck with the GB. If anything moves, maybe i'll jump in, but not now.


Title: Re: BFL chips group buy #1
Post by: wrenchmonkey on June 07, 2013, 06:48:55 AM
BFL don't make chips as far as i know. So what are you looking to buy from them?
Hm.. i see post now. interesting to start selling chips before selling complete products on wait since june last year.
i wouldnt trust them for a dime.
They do make devices and they have shipped too. Unfortunately they move with the speed of a snail on NOS. Noone trusts them and hell i wouldn't trust them even to hold my beer for a sec. I have thrown out $800 already and now waiting for a device to be shipped on the "40th of April"...
Anyway, good luck with the GB. If anything moves, maybe i'll jump in, but not now.

You realize that you can get your $800 back by just asking for it, right?  ::)


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED] - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: dan99 on June 07, 2013, 06:49:03 AM
might be interested if can be guarantee and with escrow


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED] - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: tvbcof on June 07, 2013, 06:49:39 AM

Yifu seemed to have a fairly high opinion of ASICMINER.  I do also.  Their 130nm chips strikes me as the most impressive.  Avalon's 110nm second, and the supposedly 65nm one being pawned by BFL is either not 65nm, or is a steaming little piece of shit.  Or both.  I'd certainly be writing this into any escrow agreement although it doesn't actually matter exactly why it sucks so badly I suppose.

Not surprising, since ASICMiner doesn't pose a real threat to them in terms of market share. It's easy to be generous with a company that is no serious threat to your own. BFL's chip still consumes less than half the power of Avalon's, so if it's a steaming piece of shit, it's still better than Avalon's, and if it's not really 65nm, then it's REALLY showing Avalon up...

As Yifu points out, such a small advantage going from 110nm to 65nm indicates some serious problems...or deceit.

In fact, by my read of both ~ngzhang's characteristically up-front comments and the numbers, Avalon's chips themselves are kind of a quick-n-dirty hack.  So, using them as a baseline at the 110nm size makes the BFL handled chips look even worse.

Quote
If BFL is going to go with 100% escrow, I would say there is a damn good chance that whatever they deliver would otherwise be thrown into the dumpster.

Based on WHAT (other than your obviously biased contempt for BFL)? You think BFL wants to further damage their reputation by sending out a bunch of non fuctional chips? LOL, the leaps you people will take to justify your BFL hate are incredible.  :D :D

Pffft.  How could anything 'damage' BFL's reputation at this point?



Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED] - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: wrenchmonkey on June 07, 2013, 07:00:43 AM

Yifu seemed to have a fairly high opinion of ASICMINER.  I do also.  Their 130nm chips strikes me as the most impressive.  Avalon's 110nm second, and the supposedly 65nm one being pawned by BFL is either not 65nm, or is a steaming little piece of shit.  Or both.  I'd certainly be writing this into any escrow agreement although it doesn't actually matter exactly why it sucks so badly I suppose.

Not surprising, since ASICMiner doesn't pose a real threat to them in terms of market share. It's easy to be generous with a company that is no serious threat to your own. BFL's chip still consumes less than half the power of Avalon's, so if it's a steaming piece of shit, it's still better than Avalon's, and if it's not really 65nm, then it's REALLY showing Avalon up...

As Yifu points out, such a small advantage going from 110nm to 65nm indicates some serious problems...or deceit.

In fact, by my read of both ~ngzhang's characteristically up-front comments and the numbers, Avalon's chips themselves are kind of a quick-n-dirty hack.  So, using them as a baseline at the 110nm size makes the BFL handled chips look even worse.

If the position is that they didn't squeeze as much performance as it technically possible out of that die size, then I agree. However, the performance IS better than anything else currently on the market. So, you know...

They're still the best game in town. Either they squeezed a shit-ton more performance out of a larger die size than Yufu was able to (which makes Yifu look bad), or (and I think more likely) it's really a 65nm die size, and they didn't optimize it as much as they potentially could have (which is still a better performing chip than anybody else's).

Quote
Quote
If BFL is going to go with 100% escrow, I would say there is a damn good chance that whatever they deliver would otherwise be thrown into the dumpster.

Based on WHAT (other than your obviously biased contempt for BFL)? You think BFL wants to further damage their reputation by sending out a bunch of non fuctional chips? LOL, the leaps you people will take to justify your BFL hate are incredible.  :D :D

Pffft.  How could anything 'damage' BFL's reputation at this point?

Right, it doesn't seem like you should have to take such radical leaps to find something to dislike. Why not just stick with the justified reasons to not like them, like the continuous delays and missed targets? Why does one need to make up additional baseless nonsense in order to justify already justified frustration? That's what I don't get. People are in a 'full-retard' race with each other to come up with the most absurd reasons to be frustrated with BFL, when there are already a couple of perfectly good reasons. Thank you for making my point.

If you want to be angry at BFL, be angry for real reasons. It will lend more credibility to your argument.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED] - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: tvbcof on June 07, 2013, 07:21:10 AM

Quote from: tvbcof
Quote from: wmonkey
Quote from: tvbcof
If BFL is going to go with 100% escrow, I would say there is a damn good chance that whatever they deliver would otherwise be thrown into the dumpster.

Based on WHAT (other than your obviously biased contempt for BFL)? You think BFL wants to further damage their reputation by sending out a bunch of non fuctional chips? LOL, the leaps you people will take to justify your BFL hate are incredible.  :D :D

Pffft.  How could anything 'damage' BFL's reputation at this point?

Right, it doesn't seem like you should have to take such radical leaps to find something to dislike. Why not just stick with the justified reasons to not like them, like the continuous delays and missed targets? Why does one need to make up additional baseless nonsense in order to justify already justified frustration? That's what I don't get. People are in a 'full-retard' race with each other to come up with the most absurd reasons to be frustrated with BFL, when there are already a couple of perfectly good reasons. Thank you for making my point.

If you want to be angry at BFL, be angry for real reasons. It will lend more credibility to your argument.

I'm not angry at all.  I'm heartily amused by the whole thing.  Lots of us (mostly others) have been very active at saving would-be victims a ton of money over the last year or so, and it seems that some of the newer participants in the economy are recognizing this and appreciating it.

I am pretty disgusted at BFL's business practices.  I see no way to argue that a lot of the crap that Josh has spewed has not been bald-faced lies with no hope of being true.  Similarly, I went all the way to the point of paying for their high-end item with no indication that it was a 'pre-order'.  These guys are scum-of-the-earth in my opinion and anything that anyone does to make their scams less profitable for them is A-OK with me.

The only saving grace that these guys have is that rather then victimizing senile oldsters as in the last rendition of Sonny's scammery, they are victimizing greedy Bitcoin miners.  It still suck though.



Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED] - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: wrenchmonkey on June 07, 2013, 07:30:13 AM

Quote from: tvbcof
Quote from: wmonkey
Quote from: tvbcof
If BFL is going to go with 100% escrow, I would say there is a damn good chance that whatever they deliver would otherwise be thrown into the dumpster.

Based on WHAT (other than your obviously biased contempt for BFL)? You think BFL wants to further damage their reputation by sending out a bunch of non fuctional chips? LOL, the leaps you people will take to justify your BFL hate are incredible.  :D :D

Pffft.  How could anything 'damage' BFL's reputation at this point?

Right, it doesn't seem like you should have to take such radical leaps to find something to dislike. Why not just stick with the justified reasons to not like them, like the continuous delays and missed targets? Why does one need to make up additional baseless nonsense in order to justify already justified frustration? That's what I don't get. People are in a 'full-retard' race with each other to come up with the most absurd reasons to be frustrated with BFL, when there are already a couple of perfectly good reasons. Thank you for making my point.

If you want to be angry at BFL, be angry for real reasons. It will lend more credibility to your argument.

I'm not angry at all.  I'm heartily amused by the whole thing.  Lots of us (mostly others) have been very active at saving would-be victims a ton of money over the last year or so, and it seems that some of the newer participants in the economy are recognizing this and appreciating it.

This was a general "you," as I don't think the original comment in question was yours. But you've clearly got some anger toward BFL.

Quote
I am pretty disgusted at BFL's business practices.  I see no way to argue that a lot of the crap that Josh has spewed has not been bald-faced lies with no hope of being true.  Similarly, I went all the way to the point of paying for their high-end item with no indication that it was a 'pre-order'.  These guys are scum-of-the-earth in my opinion and anything that anyone does to make their scams less profitable for them is A-OK with me.

So the ends justify the means, eh? Sorry, I don't buy it. If you can't base your argument on sound facts and logic, your argument is weak and flawed. If you have to tell lies and half-truths to get people to agree with you, then it betrays your lack of belief in your own cause.

Quote
The only saving grace that these guys have is that rather then victimizing senile oldsters as in the last rendition of Sonny's scammery, they are victimizing greedy Bitcoin miners.  It still suck though.

So you believe that BFL is just scamming, with no intention of shipping products? If you actually believe that, then I can respect it (although, I think you're incredibly ignorant to believe that). If you don't actually believe it (which I think is more likely the case), you're spreading falsehoods to support your cause, because you don't actually believe your position has enough merit to stand on its own based on fact. And I pity you.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED] - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: Plissken on June 07, 2013, 07:35:10 AM
Chip delivery schedule is approximately 100 days + two weeks + two weeks + two weeks?????.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED] - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: ummas on June 07, 2013, 08:12:29 AM
100 + 4-6 weeks


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED] - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: Operatr on June 07, 2013, 08:19:43 AM
Come on, don't support these assholes ::)


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED] - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: Tigggger on June 07, 2013, 08:43:13 AM
Come on, don't support these assholes ::)

Chips Ordered: 0

Nobody is :)


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED] - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: tiros on June 07, 2013, 09:34:48 AM
I guess they would like to sell chips for us to build miner even if they still haven't demonstrated serious production (lol  :D).
Even so miner larger then 5Gh/s power would be something like a single chip product , and it seems to be they are not up to the task building anything larger then jalapeno or what ever its called.

If they don't know how to build it, how could we expect us to know how, when its their product!?
They will give us their board design & stuff? If they have it they would be shipping their products long time ago.
BFL will be in real trouble once Avalon starts shipping chips, and it might be game over for those who ordered any of BFL ASIC products.

To sum that offer up it looks like bull shit packed in box of horse shit, tbh.
Anyway good luck with that, after all maybe I am wrong.

Of yes, that proven design line from Josh made me chuckle.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED] - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: Kernel32 on June 07, 2013, 10:40:57 AM
100 + 4-6 weeks


That is the pattern, but not the case this time. ESCROW will be released in 100 days no matter what. To BFL if they deliver the real thing in time or back to my Group Buyers.


You realize that you can get your $800 back by just asking for it, right?  ::)

If we succeed to get developers all they need (documentation, samples) as part of the deal, that will be very good news for BFL "pre-order-scheme" costumers. Josh stated that they can convert the pre-orders into chips. (Or ... well get refunded)


Chips Ordered: 0

Nobody is :)

Please note, that the Group Buy is not open yet. I'm refining the deal and discussing options with community board developers. (Chips without boards are worth nothing.)


As Yifu points out, such a small advantage going from 110nm to 65nm indicates some serious problems...or deceit.

In fact, by my read of both ~ngzhang's characteristically up-front comments and the numbers, Avalon's chips themselves are kind of a quick-n-dirty hack.  So, using them as a baseline at the 110nm size makes the BFL handled chips look even worse.

Quote
If BFL is going to go with 100% escrow, I would say there is a damn good chance that whatever they deliver would otherwise be thrown into the dumpster.

Based on WHAT (other than your obviously biased contempt for BFL)? You think BFL wants to further damage their reputation by sending out a bunch of non fuctional chips? LOL, the leaps you people will take to justify your BFL hate are incredible.  :D :D

Pffft.  How could anything 'damage' BFL's reputation at this point?

As stated above, random selection of BFL chips will be tested previous to ESCROW release. My Group Buyers either get quality on time or money back from John K. I know the idea of actually recieving a BFL product seems ridiculous, but two days ago a lot of people laughed at me about 100% escrow with BFL. The approach used now is different. No upfront, no shit.

Like it or not, the main question of future bitcoin mining isn't "Should I use GPU, FPGA or ASIC?", but "How efficient is my ASIC?"
BFL chips as demonstrated on BFL's short board (Jalapeno) are twice as efficient as Avalon's right now. That's a fact. Not saying Avalon is bad. I purchased a lot of Avalon chips.

Butterfly chips have most likely a big potential for tweaking (given the specs development during production and testing). But don't count on that. That is only my wild speculation right now.



It's funny how Yifu is your go-to-source for opinions when he is BFL's direct competitor. It's like asking Mcdonald's CEO what he thinks of the Whopper.

I like Yifu very much, he is a great man and a very capable entrepreneur. But I have to agree with PeZ on this one.

Sorry for reacting mostly to the negative posts, but those need answers. Thank you for the support.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED] - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: CumpsD on June 07, 2013, 10:43:40 AM
Looking forward to see how willing they are to send documentation and reference designs when we get any board builder on board.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED] - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: Kernel32 on June 07, 2013, 10:53:57 AM
As Chris/BkkCoins (Klondike board developer) in our communication stated:

Quote
If they (BFL) manage to ship real chips I'll be surprised and if they put out a chip spec doc I'll have a look to see if I could design a board for it, but for now I'm working on this one (Avalon )and hoping that Avalon actually does ship samples in a week or two.

Chris.

I say let's get hands of developers on BFL sample chips (and docs) in two weeks same as Avalon.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED] - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: philips on June 07, 2013, 11:09:55 AM
Looking forward to see how willing they are to send documentation and reference designs when we get any board builder on board.

The promise is there:
Quote
We are going to be releasing the specs and reference board designs, so someone will develop their own firmware.

Josh 06-06-2013 06:20 PM in Shoutbox.
But when, who knows.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED] - Group Buy #1 - 100% ESCROW John K. - Kernel32
Post by: Kernel32 on June 07, 2013, 11:42:23 AM

The promise is there:
Quote
We are going to be releasing the specs and reference board designs, so someone will develop their own firmware.

Josh 06-06-2013 06:20 PM in Shoutbox.
But when, who knows.

I wrote another email to Josh as follows:

Quote
Hi Josh,

Thank you for your answer.

John K. already expressed his good will to do the escrow.

Where I can't get you any hard number on how many chips we will buy, it's certain that the community is willing to invest a lot in this.

To get the most interesting deal possible and all of the potential/undecided costumers involved, you could give them some guarantees, that way they can put any doubts behind. Could we agree on random chip selection hash test attended by our representative before escrow release? Community based board development is also a very good motivation. Are you able to arrange sample chips (even with only some cores working) and chip documentation delivery to (2-3) community lead developers in let's say two weeks?

As the the number of chips could be pretty high, let me please know what proportions of grade A, B, C .. chips are most beneficial for your company.

Thank you Josh,
Kernel32
BitcoinTalk.org community member

Two weeks to get the samples to developers. Sounds fair?

Let's see what happens next. Stay tuned guys.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: 67152398 on June 07, 2013, 12:09:15 PM
Another scam


 >:(


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: Kernel32 on June 07, 2013, 12:17:24 PM
Another scam
 >:(
Seriously man, did you read any part of this thread? Can you explain why do you think this is a scam 67152398 ?

It's a good thing to be careful, but c'mon we have John (not the same person as Josh ;) ) .


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: blo on June 07, 2013, 12:44:42 PM
I think if the board developers would be interested and they will be able to get a working prototype in a short time, it immediately becomes a lot more interested people.

In this case, I'm ready to put some money in this.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: Operatr on June 07, 2013, 03:13:50 PM
Another scam
 >:(
Seriously man, did you read any part of this thread? Can you explain why do you think this is a scam 67152398 ?

It's a good thing to be careful, but c'mon we have John (not the same person as Josh ;) ) .

BFL itself is the scam, get real.

Zero products shipped from the revised BitForce line (Jalepenos are older and no longer offered, Little SC was supposed to replace it, none have shipped at all in over one year)

Now offering chips that are just as much vaporware as their ghost machines

And they are apparently wasting time on their own charity thing?

BFL and all of their cronies earned a scammer tag here, that should be enough to kill this thread right here and now.





Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: Zubilica on June 07, 2013, 03:23:01 PM
Till now every aspect is covered, and this not deal where the manufacturer can delay or postpone, 100 days is the deadline. I'm really hoping that you can convince some hardware developers to contribute. Break a leg.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: burnin on June 07, 2013, 05:14:53 PM
I would start work on a custom BFL-chip board once i'm done with the Avalon development.
(I am sure can recycle some design aspects which should speed things up)
But It would need encouraging news from them that indicate that we can really expect them to deliver + documentation on the chips.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: trepex on June 07, 2013, 05:28:19 PM
Is it just me, that did the math and wondered about the results?

Grade A: 16 Engines - $97/chip  =  6.0625 $ / engine
Grade B: 15 Engines - $93/chip  =  6.2000 $ / engine
Grade C: 14 Engines - $89/chip  =  6.3571 $ / engine

So no one would "order" the Grade B/C chips. I would expect those chips to be cheaper (not absolute, but per engine) so that they can still be sold.

Ralf


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: tom_o on June 07, 2013, 05:38:41 PM
Is it just me, that did the math and wondered about the results?

Grade A: 16 Engines - $97/chip  =  6.0625 $ / engine
Grade B: 15 Engines - $93/chip  =  6.2000 $ / engine
Grade C: 14 Engines - $89/chip  =  6.3571 $ / engine

So no one would "order" the Grade B/C chips. I would expect those chips to be cheaper (not absolute, but per engine) so that they can still be sold.

Ralf

The silicone and dev costs are the same, but yeah odd results. nice to get binned parts though whereas Avalon apparently 5% are DOA.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: nave on June 07, 2013, 07:04:27 PM
So I haven't been following all of the BFL drama over the past however long, but I have another concern that might be of note to this group buy.

We know that they have actual chips that work, they've shipped (a few) Jalapenos. But from what I've seen of the tear down of these devices they have 2 working chips on a board designed to house 8 chips, with a pretty beefy heatsink and fan on those two chips. They've stated they missed their power numbers, and thereby the chips run hotter than they intended. Is it possible (me not being much more than a hardware layman) that these chips run too hot for any reasonable cluster size on a PCB?

If so, then BFL could ship the chips, fully complying with the terms of the group buy, and have the money released from escrow, only to have the buyers holding chips that overheat constantly and have to be throttled or have fewer chips placed per board than intended. I think it was a surprise to a lot of people (myself included) that Josh agreed to the full escrow deal. Maybe this is why? They have a ton of chips and can only use a few per board? It would only make sense to sell them and get all the money they could out of their (our) investment at that point.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: k9quaint on June 07, 2013, 07:11:29 PM
So I haven't been following all of the BFL drama over the past however long, but I have another concern that might be of note to this group buy.

We know that they have actual chips that work, they've shipped (a few) Jalapenos. But from what I've seen of the tear down of these devices they have 2 working chips on a board designed to house 8 chips, with a pretty beefy heatsink and fan on those two chips. They've stated they missed their power numbers, and thereby the chips run hotter than they intended. Is it possible (me not being much more than a hardware layman) that these chips run too hot for any reasonable cluster size on a PCB?

If so, then BFL could ship the chips, fully complying with the terms of the group buy, and have the money released from escrow, only to have the buyers holding chips that overheat constantly and have to be throttled or have fewer chips placed per board than intended. I think it was a surprise to a lot of people (myself included) that Josh agreed to the full escrow deal. Maybe this is why? They have a ton of chips and can only use a few per board? It would only make sense to sell them and get all the money they could out of their (our) investment at that point.

That would certainly explain why they have not released the Singles or Mini-rig prototypes. Those are supposed to be densely populated boards. Perhaps the chips cannot be kept cool. Very hard to say until they release specs and samples.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: Rampion on June 07, 2013, 07:18:35 PM
Guys, what's the need to hurt yourself? Is greed so blinding, really?

Let it go. We got in the arse with BFL. We suffered, and now we accept we will never get our Singles, Mini Singles and Mini Rigs.

Don't add insult to the injury. So now they sell their chips in order for the community to find out how to design units from them? And you BUY?

Seriously guys. Have a little bit of self-respect at least.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: philips on June 07, 2013, 07:47:24 PM
Update:
Quote
Chips are sold in mixed grade lots.
https://products.butterflylabs.com/65nm-asic-bitcoin-mining-chip.html


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: ThatBitcoinGuy on June 07, 2013, 09:03:53 PM
...and just like the cans of Planter's mixed nuts, there ain't gonna be many pecans.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: newmars on June 07, 2013, 09:29:47 PM
why they plan to sell mixed grade lots?


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: MrTeal on June 07, 2013, 09:32:29 PM
why they plan to sell mixed grade lots?
Because with their previous pricing and allowing people to pick their grades, they would never sell anything but grade A chips. Now they don't have to worry about demand for one type being higher than the others.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: nave on June 07, 2013, 09:38:27 PM
So I haven't been following all of the BFL drama over the past however long, but I have another concern that might be of note to this group buy.

We know that they have actual chips that work, they've shipped (a few) Jalapenos. But from what I've seen of the tear down of these devices they have 2 working chips on a board designed to house 8 chips, with a pretty beefy heatsink and fan on those two chips. They've stated they missed their power numbers, and thereby the chips run hotter than they intended. Is it possible (me not being much more than a hardware layman) that these chips run too hot for any reasonable cluster size on a PCB?

If so, then BFL could ship the chips, fully complying with the terms of the group buy, and have the money released from escrow, only to have the buyers holding chips that overheat constantly and have to be throttled or have fewer chips placed per board than intended. I think it was a surprise to a lot of people (myself included) that Josh agreed to the full escrow deal. Maybe this is why? They have a ton of chips and can only use a few per board? It would only make sense to sell them and get all the money they could out of their (our) investment at that point.

That would certainly explain why they have not released the Singles or Mini-rig prototypes. Those are supposed to be densely populated boards. Perhaps the chips cannot be kept cool. Very hard to say until they release specs and samples.

Exactly. I might suggest to the group buy that previous to the escrow being released they are able to test a fully populated board with sample chips that are running at full speed and on all cores in order to be able to see how much heat they're putting out and work out a suitable cooling solution if one exists.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: k9quaint on June 07, 2013, 09:41:43 PM
Guys, what's the need to hurt yourself? Is greed so blinding, really?

Let it go. We got in the arse with BFL. We suffered, and now we accept we will never get our Singles, Mini Singles and Mini Rigs.

Don't add insult to the injury. So now they sell their chips in order for the community to find out how to design units from them? And you BUY?

Seriously guys. Have a little bit of self-respect at least.

Nobody has bought anything yet. AFAIK the group buy is not open. This is just an exploratory thread to see if BFL can offer (and keep to) terms that would entice the community to buy their chips.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: newmars on June 07, 2013, 09:46:38 PM
will the chips in the mixed lots be specifically labeled with "A", "B", etc?

why they plan to sell mixed grade lots?
Because with their previous pricing and allowing people to pick their grades, they would never sell anything but grade A chips. Now they don't have to worry about demand for one type being higher than the others.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: Xian01 on June 07, 2013, 10:09:58 PM
will the chips in the mixed lots be specifically labeled with "A", "B", etc?

 I believe a certain "Forrest Gump" quote about a box of chocolates is apropos about now.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: MrTeal on June 07, 2013, 11:11:36 PM
will the chips in the mixed lots be specifically labeled with "A", "B", etc?

why they plan to sell mixed grade lots?
Because with their previous pricing and allowing people to pick their grades, they would never sell anything but grade A chips. Now they don't have to worry about demand for one type being higher than the others.

No. Each chip will be labeled with a custom code and a set of clues, leading the purchaser through a set of puzzles each more devious than the last. It is only when you've gone through every challenge and survived an epic plot twist that the final grade will be revealed.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: k9quaint on June 08, 2013, 02:55:07 AM
will the chips in the mixed lots be specifically labeled with "A", "B", etc?

why they plan to sell mixed grade lots?
Because with their previous pricing and allowing people to pick their grades, they would never sell anything but grade A chips. Now they don't have to worry about demand for one type being higher than the others.

No. Each chip will be labeled with a custom code and a set of clues, leading the purchaser through a set of puzzles each more devious than the last. It is only when you've gone through every challenge and survived an epic plot twist that the final grade will be revealed.

And there is a cake.
http://cdn.themonolith.com/wp-content/uploads/Portal-cake1.jpg


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: Kernel32 on June 08, 2013, 12:34:49 PM
I would start work on a custom BFL-chip board once i'm done with the Avalon development.
(I am sure can recycle some design aspects which should speed things up)
But It would need encouraging news from them that indicate that we can really expect them to deliver + documentation on the chips.

Thank you burnin very much for taking the time.

We have now two lead community developers - burnin and Chris (Klondike) - to consider BFL chip board. Under some conditions of course. We may have the power to make this happen. (Or not.)


...........
Seriously guys. Have a little bit of self-respect at least.

We are the first to actually negotiate with BFL. That indicates BTC community is not a bunch of idiots to throw money at them with no guarantees at all. I see a lot of self-respect in that.

In business world, you don't make deals according to your feelings. You take advantage of the best available on the market and take maximal possible precautions. I'm not responsible for their previous costumers that took lesser precautions.

The truth is BFL may have the best chip technology - they invested a lot of money in their chip (maybe too much), no doubt at all.

They can't handle the board manufacturing and that's where community can take over and profit. That is a business opportunity to me.


........ and now we accept we will never get our Singles, Mini Singles and Mini Rigs.

Don't accept it and get your money and self-respect back. You kind of support what BFL does by not making so.

Another scam
 >:(
Seriously man, did you read any part of this thread? Can you explain why do you think this is a scam 67152398 ?

It's a good thing to be careful, but c'mon we have John (not the same person as Josh ;) ) .

BFL itself is the scam, get real.

Zero products shipped from the revised BitForce line (Jalepenos are older and no longer offered, Little SC was supposed to replace it, none have shipped at all in over one year)

Now offering chips that are just as much vaporware as their ghost machines

And they are apparently wasting time on their own charity thing?

BFL and all of their cronies earned a scammer tag here, that should be enough to kill this thread right here and now.

C'mon man. BFL does not manufacture the chip. You really think they are producing 65 nm chips by themselves? They have only licence to resell it. With 100% escrow I don't see any problem in that.

I'm not willing to (group)buy any boards/devices made at BFL.


So I haven't been following all of the BFL drama over the past however long, but I have another concern that might be of note to this group buy.

We know that they have actual chips that work, they've shipped (a few) Jalapenos. But from what I've seen of the tear down of these devices they have 2 working chips on a board designed to house 8 chips, with a pretty beefy heatsink and fan on those two chips. They've stated they missed their power numbers, and thereby the chips run hotter than they intended. Is it possible (me not being much more than a hardware layman) that these chips run too hot for any reasonable cluster size on a PCB?

If so, then BFL could ship the chips, fully complying with the terms of the group buy, and have the money released from escrow, only to have the buyers holding chips that overheat constantly and have to be throttled or have fewer chips placed per board than intended. I think it was a surprise to a lot of people (myself included) that Josh agreed to the full escrow deal. Maybe this is why? They have a ton of chips and can only use a few per board? It would only make sense to sell them and get all the money they could out of their (our) investment at that point.

That would certainly explain why they have not released the Singles or Mini-rig prototypes. Those are supposed to be densely populated boards. Perhaps the chips cannot be kept cool. Very hard to say until they release specs and samples.

Exactly. I might suggest to the group buy that previous to the escrow being released they are able to test a fully populated board with sample chips that are running at full speed and on all cores in order to be able to see how much heat they're putting out and work out a suitable cooling solution if one exists.

Fisrt of all, love your avatar nave. Secondly, this is a fruitful discussion I was hoping for to see here. Thank you guys (and also to others discussing and expressing support).

It seems the 65 nm chips are generating a lot more heat, than BFL expected. Where being unable to put 8pcs of 4 GH/s chips on few square inch board may discard some cute-black-box designs, for most of BTC miners the size of the board is not as crucial. (Remember GPU rigs?) They are not to keep on the desk anyways. Community developers need to reestablish what "fully populated board" means. I'm pretty sure the hash/board-square-inch  ratio would be still noticeably better than 110 nm Avalon's. My best guess is twice (as 65 nm chip consumes twice less power).

Is anyone here able to measure his Jalapeno heat parameters?
For example putting it into polystyrene box and measuring temperature over time. Maybe start with low temperature and don't go too high. Remember, it was manufactured by BFL. ;)


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: Tigggger on June 08, 2013, 02:21:37 PM
They can't handle the board manufacturing and that's where community can take over and profit. That is a business opportunity to me.

I thought it was more board design problems than getting them made, but dont want to troll so...

Almost all of the talk in burnin and bkk's threads is over my head but they seem like very smart people, who I would have confidence in to get them working and in production fairly quickly.

That presents the problem, avalon can sell chips because they aren't making any more hardware. If BFL release all the details needed and the guys above get a board working it would surely decimate BFL's order queue.

So what is their reasoning ?

It seems the 65 nm chips are generating a lot more heat, than BFL expected. Where being unable to put 8pcs of 4 GH/s chips on few square inch board may discard some cute-black-box designs, for most of BTC miners the size of the board is not as crucial. (Remember GPU rigs?) They are not to keep on the desk anyways.

I concur, they seem to be spending more time and money trying to get them into cases because they already bought them instead of just saying. Look we messed up, power and heat is more than we expected so now the board is 2/3/4 times as big and it needs a new case, or comes with 2 pieces of plywood to mount it on.  Whilst looking nice is good I suspect most people would sacrifice that to get it quicker


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: Kernel32 on June 08, 2013, 03:06:59 PM

I thought it was more board design problems than getting them made, but dont want to troll so...

You are most likely right. Manufacturing should be easy while having a good design.


Almost all of the talk in burnin and bkk's threads is over my head but they seem like very smart people, who I would have confidence in to get them working and in production fairly quickly.

That presents the problem, avalon can sell chips because they aren't making any more hardware. If BFL release all the details needed and the guys above get a board working it would surely decimate BFL's order queue.

So what is their reasoning ?

...........

I think they are sick of the design problems. I truly believe they did not picture nor intended this to happen.

The easy solution to make somebody else overtake board design and convert most of the pre-orders to chip sales seems probably very appealing to BFL right now.

They could come up with a motivation instrument for pre-order costumers. For example chip discount. That could make the magic happen, giving the fact those costumers are still interested in mining by not getting refunded already.

Butterflies would most likely also manufacture devices based on community board design. Or move to Bahamas finally. Who knows.


Please note, that most of this is only my wild speculation.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: Tigggger on June 08, 2013, 03:24:32 PM
The easy solution to make somebody else overtake board design and convert most of the pre-orders to chip sales seems probably very appealing to BFL right now.

Funnily enough in the very first post in this forum saying they were selling chips, I said something like "Maybe it's a cunning ploy to get BKK to design a board that actually works"

Quote
They could come up with a motivation instrument for pre-order costumers. For example chip discount. That could make the magic happen, giving the fact those costumers are still interested in mining by not getting refunded already

Please note, that most of this is only my wild speculation.

Possibly, my own speculation given their history is that they saw the huge amount of avalon chip orders and thought it was an easy to way to raise large amounts of needed cash.

Unforunately for them I don't think either of these options is going to happen, they've been telling too many lies for too long for large numbers of people to spend anything with them.  BFL's window is closing.

Anyway, good luck with the group buy



Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: wrenchmonkey on June 08, 2013, 03:36:29 PM
To those who are so concerned with heat dissipation, why not just go water-cooled. I don't really care about having a small cute little case that sits on my desk. I think we'd probably be fine using standard heatsinks on each pair of chips. This would require a slightly larger board area, but we're all going to be doing custom cases. If it turns out that we need more heat dissipation than we can get with heatsinks, throw a water block or two on there, and call it a day.

Ultimately, I see it as virtually a non-issue. The question now, of course, is whether it's worth paying the same $/hash to get these chips. I'm thinking BFL needs to come off their price by roughly $25/chip at a minimum. If they can come down to $50, they'll sell like hotcakes.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: k9quaint on June 08, 2013, 04:15:18 PM
To those who are so concerned with heat dissipation, why not just go water-cooled. I don't really care about having a small cute little case that sits on my desk. I think we'd probably be fine using standard heatsinks on each pair of chips. This would require a slightly larger board area, but we're all going to be doing custom cases. If it turns out that we need more heat dissipation than we can get with heatsinks, throw a water block or two on there, and call it a day.

Ultimately, I see it as virtually a non-issue. The question now, of course, is whether it's worth paying the same $/hash to get these chips. I'm thinking BFL needs to come off their price by roughly $25/chip at a minimum. If they can come down to $50, they'll sell like hotcakes.

Zomg, I agree with Wrenchmonkey about something. One heatsink + fan per chip, or a waterblock per 2-4 chips should handle the heat problem. Unfortunately, that raises the price of a unit by $15 - $35 per chip used (including copper sinks/blocks, pump & plumbing). That sort of expense shreds BFL's bang for the buck.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: erschiessen on June 08, 2013, 04:18:14 PM
Encased in a mineral oil bath?


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: turtle83 on June 08, 2013, 04:26:15 PM
Encased in a mineral oil bath?

then u need to figure out how to keep the oil cool...


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: k9quaint on June 08, 2013, 04:36:20 PM
Encased in a mineral oil bath?

To move the heat away from the chip,:
One should use copper. Copper has far higher thermal conductivity than mineral oil (like 50x). So, more chips will need more copper sinks in contact with them.
To move the heat away from the copper:
If you go with water blocks (or mineral oil blocks), then you can use less copper and move the heat away from the copper faster with water (or oil). I don't think you will save money or power consumption that way since the plumbing adds cost and complexity. A bit more copper with some fans for each cluster of 2 chips should be sufficient.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: wrenchmonkey on June 08, 2013, 05:24:10 PM
To those who are so concerned with heat dissipation, why not just go water-cooled. I don't really care about having a small cute little case that sits on my desk. I think we'd probably be fine using standard heatsinks on each pair of chips. This would require a slightly larger board area, but we're all going to be doing custom cases. If it turns out that we need more heat dissipation than we can get with heatsinks, throw a water block or two on there, and call it a day.

Ultimately, I see it as virtually a non-issue. The question now, of course, is whether it's worth paying the same $/hash to get these chips. I'm thinking BFL needs to come off their price by roughly $25/chip at a minimum. If they can come down to $50, they'll sell like hotcakes.

Zomg, I agree with Wrenchmonkey about something. One heatsink + fan per chip, or a waterblock per 2-4 chips should handle the heat problem. Unfortunately, that raises the price of a unit by $15 - $35 per chip used (including copper sinks/blocks, pump & plumbing). That sort of expense shreds BFL's bang for the buck.

This is true, and I considered that, but considering that each chip, running at 2.5GH-4GH, the density more than makes up for the cost difference. Each chip is the equivalent of roughly one of Burnin's boards, or a Klondike k-16 board, which each requires its own heatsink and board anyway. If we can use fewer boards, less power, and less real-estate than the equivalent in Avalon chips, there would actually probably be a small savings (board and assembly costs), even after accounting for the heat sinks. Not to mention that Burnin's and BKK's boards also require either individual heat sinks for each 4 chips, or one large heat sink. If we're buying heat sink material by the bar and cutting them down, we really are only paying for heat sink area, not the actual individual sinks, so it doesn't ultimately matter if we use one giant one, or several smaller ones.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: philips on June 11, 2013, 02:00:17 AM
Small update from Josh (shoutbox):
Quote
We will be dropping the price for the chips to ~75 bucks each or so. Not guaranteed on that price, but it'll likely be close to there.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: hax0red on June 11, 2013, 02:14:22 AM
Encased in a mineral oil bath?

To move the heat away from the chip,:
One should use copper. Copper has far higher thermal conductivity than mineral oil (like 50x). So, more chips will need more copper sinks in contact with them.
To move the heat away from the copper:
If you go with water blocks (or mineral oil blocks), then you can use less copper and move the heat away from the copper faster with water (or oil). I don't think you will save money or power consumption that way since the plumbing adds cost and complexity. A bit more copper with some fans for each cluster of 2 chips should be sufficient.


I would simply buy a Corsair H60 or H110 and use thermal adhesive to mount the block once I was satisfied it could do the job. I mounted a H55 to my 7870 using zip ties and it never went above 57C at 1225mhz  core (tahiti chipped version) so I already have experience with conditions that aren't exactly ideal and it worked out just like my custom water loops have and honestly took far less time but once the adhesive is used and sets there is no going back.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: k9quaint on June 11, 2013, 02:40:21 AM
Encased in a mineral oil bath?

To move the heat away from the chip,:
One should use copper. Copper has far higher thermal conductivity than mineral oil (like 50x). So, more chips will need more copper sinks in contact with them.
To move the heat away from the copper:
If you go with water blocks (or mineral oil blocks), then you can use less copper and move the heat away from the copper faster with water (or oil). I don't think you will save money or power consumption that way since the plumbing adds cost and complexity. A bit more copper with some fans for each cluster of 2 chips should be sufficient.


I would simply buy a Corsair H60 or H110 and use thermal adhesive to mount the block once I was satisfied it could do the job. I mounted a H55 to my 7870 using zip ties and it never went above 57C at 1225mhz  core (tahiti chipped version) so I already have experience with conditions that aren't exactly ideal and it worked out just like my custom water loops have and honestly took far less time but once the adhesive is used and sets there is no going back.

An H110 would almost certainly do the job, but that is an extra $130 per chip cluster. That cooling expense drops BFL's price/performance below Avalon's.
Plus, scaling chip clusters would be hard with all the extra plumbing required.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on June 11, 2013, 03:18:38 AM
Small update from Josh (shoutbox):
Quote
We will be dropping the price for the chips to ~75 bucks each or so. Not guaranteed on that price, but it'll likely be close to there.

Sales are so brisk, outta the kindness of their hearts they're offering a discount. Now why didn't they do that for their actual miners?


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: philips on June 11, 2013, 03:30:38 AM
FFS man,
when they raise the price = they're evil,
when they lower the price = they're evil.

Whatever they do, is not good enough for some.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: Bicknellski on June 11, 2013, 03:43:29 AM
FFS man,
when they raise the price = they're evil,
when they lower the price = they're evil.

Whatever they do, is not good enough for some.

When they fail to ship and lie about many aspects with regards to their build and timelines they are not evil, they just lack morality and ethical boundaries the most of us in the community find reprehensible. No one in their right mind is going to waste their time producing a design that won't have chips available. Given the fact that Avalon is going to 55nm undercuts everything BFL is doing and pretty much closes the door on them especially if Avalon gets those chips to market in 4 months time. If some of the work already done on the Klondike can be morphed into the Bonanza... well I would say people doing a new BFL PCB design are going to have a dead end road as no one is going to buy it.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: philips on June 11, 2013, 03:46:43 AM
FFS man,
when they raise the price = they're evil,
when they lower the price = they're evil.

Whatever they do, is not good enough for some.

When they fail to ship and lie about many aspects with regards to their build and timelines they are not evil, they just lack morality and ethical boundaries the most of us in the community find reprehensible.

OK, I will fix it:

when they raise the price = they lack morality and ethical boundaries the most of us in the community find reprehensible,
when they lower the price = they lack morality and ethical boundaries the most of us in the community find reprehensible.

Whatever they do, is not good enough for some.

There.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: Bicknellski on June 11, 2013, 03:50:11 AM
They haven't done anything...

Where are the units?

Where are the chips?

Where are the documents for someone to actually design a PCB?

If you actually think these people at BFL can be trusted to put all the necessary information out and have working "grade A" chips the you are delusional. Seriously what does price have to do with anything given their track record. No one is going to design anything for these chips it would be a waste of time. They can't even design a board and they have had 11 months! Also who wants to buy from BFL at all? They pretty much slit their own throats and as a community no one especially PCB designers should come to their aid. Let em rot.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: philips on June 11, 2013, 04:08:12 AM
They haven't done anything...

Where are the units?

Where are the chips?

Where are the documents for someone to actually design a PCB?

If you actually think these people at BFL can be trusted to put all the necessary information out and have working "grade A" chips the you are delusional. Seriously what does price have to do with anything given their track record. No one is going to design anything for these chips it would be a waste of time. They can't even design a board and they have had 11 months! Also who wants to buy from BFL at all? They pretty much slit their own throats and as a community no one especially PCB designers should come to their aid. Let em rot.

If trusting BFL is delusional, then I am delusional and that's my problem, please don't try to cure me. So far they delivered 6 units to me, so I am OK with being delusional.

Who wants to buy from BFL? I am pretty sure they will and have lots of customers (but then again, I am delusional).

Let them rot?
  ;D ;D ;D
Man, you have issues or really love theatricals.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: Bicknellski on June 11, 2013, 04:51:35 AM
They haven't done anything...

Where are the units?

Where are the chips?

Where are the documents for someone to actually design a PCB?

If you actually think these people at BFL can be trusted to put all the necessary information out and have working "grade A" chips the you are delusional. Seriously what does price have to do with anything given their track record. No one is going to design anything for these chips it would be a waste of time. They can't even design a board and they have had 11 months! Also who wants to buy from BFL at all? They pretty much slit their own throats and as a community no one especially PCB designers should come to their aid. Let em rot.

If trusting BFL is delusional, then I am delusional and that's my problem, please don't try to cure me. So far they delivered 6 units to me, so I am OK with being delusional.

Who wants to buy from BFL? I am pretty sure they will and have lots of customers (but then again, I am delusional).

Let them rot?
  ;D ;D ;D
Man, you have issues or really love theatricals.


No theatrics...

Where are the fucking the miners?
Where are the fucking chips?
Where are the fucking design specs to make a PCB work with the chips?
Which kind of fucking chips will they ship grade D?


Dude stop being a poster boy for a lost cause. BFL is a turd that won't even float.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: philips on June 11, 2013, 04:55:37 AM
Quote
Where are the fucking the miners?
Where are the fucking chips?
Where are the fucking design specs to make a PCB work with the chips?
Which kind of fucking chips will they ship grade D?

Gee, wipe that foam man...just a little more...there.
I can understand complaining, but you just went berserk there, red eyes and all.
I thought you were a teacher or something  ???


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: wrenchmonkey on June 11, 2013, 06:15:41 AM
BFL has shipped 3 months worth of Jalapeno orders in about a week's time. This is why Bicknellski and his fellow BFL trolls are getting desperate, leading him to search for all terms BFL, and post nonsense in every thread he can find, including posts that have been dead for months. Also why he's clearly over his limit on the 'rageahol'...  ;D


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: Inaba on June 11, 2013, 06:18:22 AM
I think he passed his limit about a week ago.  He's on an epic bender at this point.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: Bicknellski on June 11, 2013, 06:19:37 AM
Proof? Evidence?

Those be nice to have.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: josiasrdz on June 11, 2013, 08:10:32 AM
I don't see the problem with this group buy...best case scenario we get miners that are superior to avalons 100 days from now, worst case scenario we get our money back


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: mezzomix on June 11, 2013, 08:39:34 AM
Oh, I remember a story about a 1000 BTC charity bet and BFL founding their own "charity". Guys, buy those chips from BFL and we will see in 100 days if BFL found a way to weasel out of the deal and keep your money.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: CtmanGer on June 11, 2013, 08:46:51 AM
Who would buid a miner out of that chips? So for 40gh it would be 1000 $ plus 1000-2000 $ or even more?


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: PuertoLibre on June 11, 2013, 01:34:31 PM
I'd be interested in around 1,000 chips towards the group buy.


https://products.butterflylabs.com/65nm-asic-bitcoin-mining-chip.html

It looks like they are for sale now. $75/each (Much better price) What is the status of this thread?

I did hear that prior to the price change they would be giving discounts based on quantity, hopefully this translates into even better prices for the group buy.
LoL!

They aren't selling at all compared to the Avalon chips which have a known working implementation.

Seems they slashed the price by [very roughly] ~25% to try to lull people into buying chips without the board....Yikes...

Reeks of desperation.

The old offer:

Original message by Josh:
Quote
Butterfly Labs will begin selling bulk chips to individuals and companies starting in June, 2013. Chip delivery schedule is approximately 100 days through end packaging once your order is placed. We will be providing reference documentation, reference design/schematics, and foundry receipt/documentation.

Grade A chips have 16 engines and will do 250 MHz comfortably, equating to 4 GH/s per chip.

Chips will be graded and priced as follows:

Grade A: 16 Engines - $97/chip
Grade B: 15 Engines - $93/chip
Grade C: 14 Engines - $89/chip

Grade D: 13 Engines or less - $83/chip

Our chips will be provided in minimum lots of 100 with the following price structure:

100 - 999 chips - Regular Price
1000 - 9999 chips - 5% discount
10,000 - 99,999 chips - 10% discount
100,000 or more - 20% discount

Chip orders will require 50% down and 50% upon order delivery. Payment can be made via BTC (preferred) or bank wire.

Advantages of BFL chips:

1/2 the power usage per GH as the closest competitor
1/10th the silicon area per GH as the closest competitor (Very high performance density)
You can use off the shelf heat sinks depending on your chip layout due to FCBGA package vs custom underside heat sinks as required on some QFN packages. You don't have to design and manufacture heat sinks!
Proven design currently operating in the field and ready to go.


I noticed on their site it now reads that they are selling mixed lots...?

Does this mean they are no longer sorting out the Grade A's from the D's or what?

Is this going to be like an easter egg hunt where one has to figure out what chips are grade A's? Also read yesterday that they want the buyers to create their own firmware. Kind of a tall task! (Can't they just give the board makers their own reference firmware(s)?)

If they keep making it harder and harder to turn those chips into actual mining rigs they might as well keep slashing the damn prices! Gonna need to pay a whole development team just to figure it all out.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: hax0red on June 11, 2013, 04:09:12 PM
Encased in a mineral oil bath?

To move the heat away from the chip,:
One should use copper. Copper has far higher thermal conductivity than mineral oil (like 50x). So, more chips will need more copper sinks in contact with them.
To move the heat away from the copper:
If you go with water blocks (or mineral oil blocks), then you can use less copper and move the heat away from the copper faster with water (or oil). I don't think you will save money or power consumption that way since the plumbing adds cost and complexity. A bit more copper with some fans for each cluster of 2 chips should be sufficient.


I would simply buy a Corsair H60 or H110 and use thermal adhesive to mount the block once I was satisfied it could do the job. I mounted a H55 to my 7870 using zip ties and it never went above 57C at 1225mhz  core (tahiti chipped version) so I already have experience with conditions that aren't exactly ideal and it worked out just like my custom water loops have and honestly took far less time but once the adhesive is used and sets there is no going back.

An H110 would almost certainly do the job, but that is an extra $130 per chip cluster. That cooling expense drops BFL's price/performance below Avalon's.
Plus, scaling chip clusters would be hard with all the extra plumbing required.

 True but if you can get away with an H50-60 sized cooler they can be had at $40-50 for restocked/refurbished units as well as the Antec 620s. Consider that with possibility of overclocking and you may have potential worth looking at which IMO gives reason for second thought as far as  Avalon vs BFL processors once widely available. But for now I would stick with a company that delivers more consistently.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: Rampion on June 11, 2013, 04:26:12 PM
So... The chips will be shipped and hashing before any non-Jalapeño customer receives their unit, right?

Cool.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: Lucko on June 11, 2013, 06:58:38 PM
Interested. I can even help you with EU build boards... Probably also some R&D making batter boards. Plans just need CE markings... But I'm limited in a amount of money for this.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: Kernel32 on June 11, 2013, 10:56:05 PM
We received BFL reaction regarding sample chips request and hash test of produced chips before escrow release possibilities.

Quote
I can provide you with sample chips prior to the chip purchase, yes. It would obviously be a limited number of chips, but we can certainly spare a few of course.

How are you proposing to do the random chip selection hash test prior to release?  In principal I don't have a problem with this, however there are some practical pitfalls here, chiefly what if you don't have boards or a test rig ready to do a proper test of the chips, do we then wait until you are ready?  

I hope to have the reference documentation done this week.  We are pretty time crunched getting the singles and MR ready to ship, which should also start this week.  Once that starts rolling we can focus more on the technical documents.  

By now, I'm sure you've seen the new pricing and the fact that the chips will be shipped as a mixed lot, so it probably renders your final question invalid.  If not, let me know.


I'm glad BFL agreed on shipping 65 nm chip samples to community mining board devs.

If developers get chips and quality documentation (*might* be even this week), they would be able to estimate board design/prototyping period(/feasibility). That is crucial info to have before actually opening the group buy.

Sample chips distribution is my top priority right now.

BFL also agrees on HASH test prior to escrow release. I would like them to make few Short Boards (Jalapenos) available for testing. (If there is no 65 nm community mining board at hand already.)

Mixed lot structure:
- 60% Grade A (16 engines - equals to 4.00 GH/s)
- 20% Grade B (15 engines - equals to 3.75 GH/s)
- 15% Grade C (14 engines - equals to 3.50 GH/s)
- 5% Grade D (no less than 12 engines - equals to no less than 3.00 GH/s)

Clock rate (speed) of engines is between 250 and 294 mhz. That means about +/- 7,5% individual hash rate fluctuations. Price for 60/20/15/5 quality lot is $75/chip.

I have yet to find out whether Grade of the chip is known prior to usage (Group Buyers would be compensated for buying lower quality chips) or not (lottery style).

I get quite a lot of PM's of people asking how to join the Group Buy. Please notice, we are still in preparation phase. Making sure our deal with BFL is safe and sweet.

Some also asked about shipping/VAT, whether this is a US/EU/Asia based group. Well, this is international group. All of the chips will be sent from warehouse in California directly to costumers/chosen board manufacturers with possibility of merged shipment to EU.

Thank you so far. I'll keep you posted.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: delaria on June 11, 2013, 11:30:09 PM
i have a slight interest for about 500 chips. Still thinking about it though.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: josiasrdz on June 11, 2013, 11:41:26 PM
are you going to sent half of the sample chips to burnin and the other half to bkkcoins?


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: Hiroaki on June 12, 2013, 12:30:39 AM
SCAM SCAM SCAM

First they should ship all the other units !!!
Unbelievable how they treat the whole bitcoin community !!!!!

I m surprised that they are not scared of their own customers ;)


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: TheSwede75 on June 12, 2013, 01:39:53 AM
I have to say that I am almost blown away by the amount of butthurt! Yes, we get it. You haven't gotten your BFL miners yet, cry cry. The chips are a PROVEN design, delivered by GLOBAL FOUNDRIES! BFL and their development delays have nothing to do with it. Jeez, you cry all over the forum, how about sticking to one of the other 1000 threads about BFL orders?


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: josiasrdz on June 12, 2013, 01:47:30 AM
I have to say that I am almost blown away by the amount of butthurt! Yes, we get it. You haven't gotten your BFL miners yet, cry cry. The chips are a PROVEN design, delivered by GLOBAL FOUNDRIES! BFL and their development delays have nothing to do with it. Jeez, you cry all over the forum, how about sticking to one of the other 1000 threads about BFL orders?
This^^ bfl may be incompetent, but the combination of global foundries, burning and bkkcoins is not :P bfl is just going to be the middlemen between global foundries and the persons making the boards


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: k9quaint on June 12, 2013, 01:55:19 AM
I have to say that I am almost blown away by the amount of butthurt! Yes, we get it. You haven't gotten your BFL miners yet, cry cry. The chips are a PROVEN design, delivered by GLOBAL FOUNDRIES! BFL and their development delays have nothing to do with it. Jeez, you cry all over the forum, how about sticking to one of the other 1000 threads about BFL orders?

Global foundries can reliably make chips.
If you could order the chip direct from GF without going through BFL, then you would have no worries (other than the chip being sensitive to heat damage due to poor design, or something weird like that). Since BFL is involved, delays and broken promises are to be expected given BFL's track record. The exact form those delays will manifest as cannot be predicted.

It would be a delight for once to listen to BFL say "Two more weeks! (TM)" and have it arrive in less than 14 days.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: Abdussamad on June 12, 2013, 02:39:31 AM
I don't see the problem with this group buy...best case scenario we get miners that are superior to avalons 100 days from now, worst case scenario we get our money back

Worst case you've locked up your money for 3+ months and have to pay John's escrow fees.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: Abdussamad on June 12, 2013, 02:42:53 AM
@Kernel32 who are you? You have few posts and you only joined in April this year. Why should anyone trust you?


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: k9quaint on June 12, 2013, 03:13:01 AM
I don't see the problem with this group buy...best case scenario we get miners that are superior to avalons 100 days from now, worst case scenario we get our money back

Worst case you've locked up your money for 3+ months and have to pay John's escrow fees.

Worst case is BFL's chips MTBF is 3 months.
Second worse case is the chip lot distribution much worse than BFL claims (I'd rather pay $90 for a known product than $75 and trust BFL's math ;)
Third worst case is the community also has trouble getting boards to work causing delays (BFL was not incompetent, the chips are finicky and not a slam dunk to support on a board)
Fourth worst case is KNCMiner delivers early with better bang for the buck and hashrate goes through the roof.
Fifth worst case, Tebow starts at QB for the patriots.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: PuertoLibre on June 12, 2013, 03:27:28 AM
@Kernel32 who are you? You have few posts and you only joined in April this year. Why should anyone trust you?
Because unlike every other BFL chip thread, he (kernel32) has done everything perfectly right.

There is no possibility of losing your money up until the chips arriving. Whether or not Kernel32 finds the developers to turn those chips into boards is the only risk.

I cannot more highly recommend this (and only this) particular group buy.

If you want guarantees on the chips, this is the place to conduct business.



Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: PuertoLibre on June 12, 2013, 03:37:58 AM
@ Kernel32

Could you get in contact with BFL and clarify this point? I tried to get the answer through theswede but he didn't seem to have any idea about it.

=======Reposted======


2. Ordering is from Global Foundries that also handle delivery

Will the tracking information come straight from the packaging facility or from BFL offices?

If you don't know, could you find out?

I am worried that BFL is going to send us the defunct lot they are using right now instead of the brand new lot that will be baked at the Fab. I don't want yesterdays revision that has caused so many problems (let them deal with those). I want the latest revision fresh from the Fab.

======reposted======


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: Unacceptable on June 12, 2013, 03:42:18 AM
If they come straight from the "fab" won't they still need to be "bumped" & "packaged"??

So you need to send them to another place or two........................or will the "fab" handle this??


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: MrTeal on June 12, 2013, 03:46:35 AM
If they come straight from the "fab" won't they still need to be "bumped" & "packaged"??

So you need to send them to another place or two........................or will the "fab" handle this??

BFL arranges the bumping and packaging at their contracted facilities, it's not handled by GloFo.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: RandyFolds on June 13, 2013, 07:33:01 AM
If they come straight from the "fab" won't they still need to be "bumped" & "packaged"??

So you need to send them to another place or two........................or will the "fab" handle this??

BFL arranges the bumping and packaging at their contracted facilities, it's not handled by GloFo.

The only bumping being done by BFL consists of white powder going into their noses, conveniently purchased from silkroad with all of your BTC. It's only a matter of time until josh goes out Scarface style.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: Unacceptable on June 14, 2013, 03:37:18 AM
If they come straight from the "fab" won't they still need to be "bumped" & "packaged"??

So you need to send them to another place or two........................or will the "fab" handle this??

BFL arranges the bumping and packaging at their contracted facilities, it's not handled by GloFo.

The only bumping being done by BFL consists of white powder going into their noses, conveniently purchased from silkroad with all of your BTC. It's only a matter of time until josh goes out Scarface style.

Thats funny  :D

I'm from Miami,fl & remember all that scarface stuff when it was going on,very scary ;)


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: CtmanGer on June 14, 2013, 09:41:29 AM
Whats the status?

Especially board development.
Chips alone are worth nothing. At least for me.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: piit79 on June 14, 2013, 09:51:44 AM
Whats the status?

Especially board development.
Chips alone are worth nothing. At least for me.
I don't think BFL have released any documentation for the chips so nothing can be done until they do...


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: PuertoLibre on June 14, 2013, 10:00:21 AM
They like to keep people in perpetual suspense.  :D


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: josiasrdz on June 14, 2013, 10:13:23 AM
The documentation for the chips is going to take two more weeks  :P


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: driksson on June 14, 2013, 12:07:38 PM
The documentation for the chips is going to take two more weeks  :P
Right, so without documentation, they can sell 1TH chips for all they care, without documentation how can they expect orders?
Will they send sample chips upon order placed? I believe this is the only way for board developers to be able to test their boards..
I have my doubts about this whole setup.. it just feels like, a SETUP!
Will follow though.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: marto74 on June 14, 2013, 02:05:01 PM
Just wondering , what 100% escrow deal?


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: piit79 on June 14, 2013, 02:10:16 PM
Just wondering , what 100% escrow deal?
How about reading the thread? ;) Basically, BFL accepted payment via escrow - they only get paid if they deliver by the deadline specified (100 days from order).


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: KS on June 14, 2013, 02:14:56 PM
Just wondering , what 100% escrow deal?

welcome to page 1! I mean 9!  :D


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: marto74 on June 14, 2013, 02:29:29 PM
Why then the order is not open


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: KS on June 14, 2013, 04:17:49 PM
Why then the order is not open

welcome to page 1! I mean 9! :D

Bis repetita. See below, BFL made some changes, they're still talking though the details etc. (and... no documentation yet)

65 nm efficient BFL chips Group Buy under the conditions:

- BFL delives sample chips and datasheets to board developers on time previously agreed on. (two weeks- pending)

- BFL delives ordered chips in quality and on time previously agreed on. (100 days - accepted)

- They don't get the money if they don't deliver ON TIME. (100% ESCROW by John K. - accepted)

UPDATE 1: Josh/BFL accepted our escrow offer [June 06]

STATUS: GB not open yet, Refining deal with Josh, discussing board development options with burnin, Chris/BkkCoins (Klondike), allten and other community developers


We have now three lead community developers - burnin, Chris (Klondike) and allten - considering BFL chip board. Under some conditions of course. We may have the power to make this happen. (Or not.)



Random selection of BFL chips will be put trough hash test previous to ESCROW release. My Group Buyers either get quality on time or money back from John K. I know the idea of actually recieving a BFL product seems ridiculous, but two days ago a lot of people laughed at me about 100% escrow with BFL. The approach used now is different. No upfront, no shit policy.
Remember BFL needs the community to produce a mining board or they won't sell ... a single chip.[/b]

Original message by Josh:
Quote
Butterfly Labs will begin selling bulk chips to individuals and companies starting in June, 2013. Chip delivery schedule is approximately 100 days through end packaging once your order is placed. We will be providing reference documentation, reference design/schematics, and foundry receipt/documentation.

Grade A chips have 16 engines and will do 250 MHz comfortably, equating to 4 GH/s per chip.

Chips will be graded and priced as follows:

Grade A: 16 Engines - $97/chip
Grade B: 15 Engines - $93/chip
Grade C: 14 Engines - $89/chip

Grade D: 13 Engines or less - $83/chip

Our chips will be provided in minimum lots of 100 with the following price structure:

100 - 999 chips - Regular Price
1000 - 9999 chips - 5% discount
10,000 - 99,999 chips - 10% discount
100,000 or more - 20% discount

Chip orders will require 50% down and 50% upon order delivery. Payment can be made via BTC (preferred) or bank wire.

Advantages of BFL chips:

1/2 the power usage per GH as the closest competitor
1/10th the silicon area per GH as the closest competitor (Very high performance density)
You can use off the shelf heat sinks depending on your chip layout due to FCBGA package vs custom underside heat sinks as required on some QFN packages. You don't have to design and manufacture heat sinks!
Proven design currently operating in the field and ready to go.


Funds would be probably gathered in BTC as order takes place and incrased/decrased based on BTC to dollar fluctuation before hand-to-hand payment. No cost (full refund) bailout.

Let me know what do you think. I can try to negotiate our terms of deal if there is enough willing people behind me.

EDIT 1: I described the situation and conditions to BFL sales. Awaiting reply.

Quote
Greetings Butterfly Labs,

I represent some of the BitcoinTalk.org community members willing to buy your ASIC chips. There is demand and I expect a significant order if we manage to agree on some basic business terms.

We would like you to guarantee delivery date both sites agree on. 100 days for example with a small reserve for unexpected events. To make sure no other delays occur, John K. is willing to 100% escrow the transaction.

You can present your attitude to such conditions and propose your own to the community as email reply or directly by posting in the BFL Chips Group Buy Thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=223571

Thank you very much,
Kernel32
BitcoinTalk.org community member

EDIT 2: Josh/BFL agreed.

EDIT 3: Awaiting another reply to following proposal:


Quote
Hi Josh,

Thank you for your answer.

John K. already expressed his good will to do the escrow.

Where I can't get you any hard number on how many chips we will buy, it's certain that the community is willing to invest a lot in this.

To get the most interesting deal possible and all of the potential/undecided costumers involved, you could give them some guarantees, that way they can put any doubts behind. Could we agree on random chip selection hash test attended by our representative before escrow release? Community based board development is also a very good motivation. Are you able to arrange sample chips (even with only some cores working) and chip documentation delivery to (2-3) community lead developers in let's say two weeks?

As the the number of chips could be pretty high, let me please know what proportions of grade A, B, C .. chips are most beneficial for your company.

Thank you Josh,
Kernel32
BitcoinTalk.org community member


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: flowdab on June 14, 2013, 06:50:21 PM
FWIW I've paid for an order of chips and have requested developer chips and reference docs. When I get those I will post the docs here and then send the chips to whichever dev's have the community's support and can put the time into actually producing an actual working board.

*Note - I don't want to hear how this is a stupid purchase. I've done my risk assessment and think this is a good commercial opportunity. If you disagree with that then please keep it to yourself.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: k9quaint on June 14, 2013, 06:56:48 PM
FWIW I've paid for an order of chips and have requested developer chips and reference docs. When I get those I will post the docs here and then send the chips to whichever dev's have the community's support and can put the time into actually producing an actual working board.

*Note - I don't want to hear how this is a stupid purchase. I've done my risk assessment and think this is a good commercial opportunity. If you disagree with that then please keep it to yourself.

Or, if people think it is a bad purchase they could post it here and you could refrain from reading it. Unless you work for the NSA that is.  ;D


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: flowdab on June 14, 2013, 07:03:35 PM
FWIW I've paid for an order of chips and have requested developer chips and reference docs. When I get those I will post the docs here and then send the chips to whichever dev's have the community's support and can put the time into actually producing an actual working board.

*Note - I don't want to hear how this is a stupid purchase. I've done my risk assessment and think this is a good commercial opportunity. If you disagree with that then please keep it to yourself.

Or, if people think it is a bad purchase they could post it here and you could refrain from reading it. Unless you work for the NSA that is.  ;D

Ha!

NSA: Not bad guys, just people with boring jobs who spend all day on the internet.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: newmars on June 15, 2013, 02:17:45 AM
when will Reference documentation be released to open source?


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: CoinHoarder on June 15, 2013, 02:22:01 AM
when will Reference documentation be released to open source?

Three to six weeks.  ;)


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: KS on June 15, 2013, 10:54:24 AM
FWIW I've paid for an order of chips and have requested developer chips and reference docs. When I get those I will post the docs here and then send the chips to whichever dev's have the community's support and can put the time into actually producing an actual working board.

*Note - I don't want to hear how this is a stupid purchase. I've done my risk assessment and think this is a good commercial opportunity. If you disagree with that then please keep it to yourself.

Good for you! Haters will be haters but if you have done your due diligence and think this is the right move for you, go for it. You make up you own decisions, not the crowd.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: piit79 on June 15, 2013, 11:16:12 AM
*Note - I don't want to hear how this is a stupid purchase.
Man, that was a stupid purchase! ::) Nah, just kidding (you were asking for it :) )

There is often a very fine line between stupid and brave :)


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: Zubilica on June 15, 2013, 03:40:17 PM
It seems that 75$/chip isn't the lowest value for the chips.

https://forums.butterflylabs.com/announcements/3272-customer-appreciation-chip-credit-program.html


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: John (John K.) on June 15, 2013, 05:25:51 PM
*John is still looking from the sidelines*


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: k9quaint on June 15, 2013, 05:29:52 PM
*John is still looking from the sidelines*

One of the qualities I look for in an escrow is the ability to convincingly pull off referring to themselves in the third person.  ;D


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: PeZ on June 15, 2013, 06:05:35 PM
It seems that 75$/chip isn't the lowest value for the chips.

https://forums.butterflylabs.com/announcements/3272-customer-appreciation-chip-credit-program.html
Can you stack the discounts in a single order?


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: piit79 on June 15, 2013, 06:07:58 PM
Can you stack the discounts in a single order?
Like get 3*100 discount coupons and get 100 chips for free? :-D I think that question does not need to be answered.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: filharvey on June 15, 2013, 06:46:27 PM
In Josh's post on the the bfl forum he mentions $75 per chip. So have chip prices been reduced already?


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: Lucko on June 15, 2013, 07:03:01 PM
In Josh's post on the the bfl forum he mentions $75 per chip. So have chip prices been reduced already?
Yes...


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: flowdab on June 15, 2013, 07:10:03 PM
*Note - I don't want to hear how this is a stupid purchase.
Man, that was a stupid purchase! ::) Nah, just kidding (you were asking for it :) )

There is often a very fine line between stupid and brave :)

Agreed! Hopefully I'm the latter and not the former.

And I was asking for it. :)


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: cycloid on June 15, 2013, 11:09:58 PM
K So I got credit for 100Chips from BFL I dont want to sell it would like to work out a deal with some one who is building mining units PM me

Cheers


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: Unacceptable on June 15, 2013, 11:46:56 PM
IF,BFL states in WRITING the chips will be delivered by such & such a date & IF you guys can get a working board,I will be in with my measly 16 chip credit  8)

We need to see this documentation though,or at least a promise from the group buyer in some way.............Either way,I'm not going to wait another year for them to get the ball rolling  ::)


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: EvilLizardApparel on June 16, 2013, 12:11:54 AM
As long as there is proof of board development, and assembly capacity (I would pay an extra fee for someone to assemble and test), I would gladly add atleast 300-400 chips to the group buy.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: newmars on June 16, 2013, 12:14:07 AM
Credit program will be incorporated into the group buy?


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: Zubilica on June 16, 2013, 05:21:33 AM
Chip data.

https://forums.butterflylabs.com/announcements/3014-butterfly-labs-announces-bulk-chip-sales.html

BFL SC  firmware.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=235312.0;topicseen

Kaboom , this may work.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: turtle83 on June 16, 2013, 05:27:38 AM
Chip data.

https://forums.butterflylabs.com/announcements/3014-butterfly-labs-announces-bulk-chip-sales.html

BFL SC  firmware.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=235312.0;topicseen

Kaboom , this may work.

What does FPGA firmware/bitstream have to do with ASIC?


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: MoonShad0w384 on June 16, 2013, 09:42:49 AM
I'm in with my 40 chip credit. Watching this thread.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: MoonShad0w384 on June 16, 2013, 09:45:27 AM
Chip data.

https://forums.butterflylabs.com/announcements/3014-butterfly-labs-announces-bulk-chip-sales.html

BFL SC  firmware.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=235312.0;topicseen

Kaboom , this may work.

What does FPGA firmware/bitstream have to do with ASIC?

Presumably this is the firmware that runs on the micros in BFL units. As Luke-Jr states, it's for BitForce SC (ASIC), not FPGA.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: Wardan_reloadeD on June 16, 2013, 10:29:36 AM
I have 32 credits for sale at 6btc. PM me.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: Kernel32 on June 16, 2013, 01:50:19 PM
FWIW I've paid for an order of chips and have requested developer chips and reference docs. When I get those I will post the docs here and then send the chips to whichever dev's have the community's support and can put the time into actually producing an actual working board.

*Note - I don't want to hear how this is a stupid purchase. I've done my risk assessment and think this is a good commercial opportunity. If you disagree with that then please keep it to yourself.
flowdab, you took quite a risk, but it could pay off.

Until developers have sample chips/documentation and are sure they can design a working board (or at least one of the lead developers is) it's too risky for the majority of potential group buyers (including myself).

We'll see pretty soon whether BFL is really willing to deliver sample chips/docs or it was just marketing move to sell as much useless chips as possible. Speaking of useless chips...


.......
I am worried that BFL is going to send us the defunct lot they are using right now instead of the brand new lot that will be baked at the Fab. I don't want yesterdays revision that has caused so many problems (let them deal with those). I want the latest revision fresh from the Fab.
......
Could you get in contact with BFL and clarify this point?

Although we should be able to find out what revision and quality the chips are during random hash test (prior to escrow release), this is still a very important matter to look into. Thank you for pointing this out. Let you know as soon as there is some reply from BFL.

Credit program will be incorporated into the group buy?

I didn't discuss credit program options with Josh yet, but it should be incorporated. I see no obstacles there.

Thank you for the support guys. Stay tuned.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: phantastisch on June 16, 2013, 02:05:11 PM
FWIW I've paid for an order of chips and have requested developer chips and reference docs. When I get those I will post the docs here and then send the chips to whichever dev's have the community's support and can put the time into actually producing an actual working board.

*Note - I don't want to hear how this is a stupid purchase. I've done my risk assessment and think this is a good commercial opportunity. If you disagree with that then please keep it to yourself.
flowdab, you took quite a risk, but it could pay off.

Until developers have sample chips/documentation and are sure they can design a working board (or at least one of the lead developers is) it's too risky for the majority of potential group buyers (including myself).

We'll see pretty soon whether BFL is really willing to deliver sample chips/docs or it was just marketing move to sell as much useless chips as possible. Speaking of useless chips...


.......
I am worried that BFL is going to send us the defunct lot they are using right now instead of the brand new lot that will be baked at the Fab. I don't want yesterdays revision that has caused so many problems (let them deal with those). I want the latest revision fresh from the Fab.
......
Could you get in contact with BFL and clarify this point?

Although we should be able to find out what revision and quality the chips are during random hash test (prior to escrow release), this is still a very important matter to look into. Thank you for pointing this out. Let you know as soon as there is some reply from BFL.

Credit program will be incorporated into the group buy?

I didn't discuss credit program options with Josh yet, but it should be incorporated. I see no obstacles there.

Thank you for the support guys. Stay tuned.


Well transfering credits should be no problem.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: Lucko on June 16, 2013, 03:53:48 PM
What are we still waiting for? I think that we have all we need. Well only chips are not with developers jet. All else has been meet... So could you open GB?

EDIT: Unless we have some guarantees that we will receive them first... Time is BTC


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: CumpsD on June 16, 2013, 04:27:31 PM
What are we still waiting for? I think that we have all we need. Well only chips are not with developers jet. All else has been meet... So could you open GB?

EDIT: Unless we have some guarantees that we will receive them first... Time is BTC

Documentation.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: Lucko on June 16, 2013, 04:29:26 PM
What are we still waiting for? I think that we have all we need. Well only chips are not with developers jet. All else has been meet... So could you open GB?

EDIT: Unless we have some guarantees that we will receive them first... Time is BTC

Documentation.
Wasn't that published?
Chip data.

https://forums.butterflylabs.com/announcements/3014-butterfly-labs-announces-bulk-chip-sales.html

BFL SC  firmware.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=235312.0;topicseen

Kaboom , this may work.
I'm not registered so I can't download PDF... But I thought that was that...


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: piit79 on June 16, 2013, 04:37:33 PM
Documentation.
Wasn't that published?
Chip data.

https://forums.butterflylabs.com/announcements/3014-butterfly-labs-announces-bulk-chip-sales.html
I'm not registered so I can't download PDF... But I thought that was that...
Yes, I looked through the PDF and as far as I can tell it actually looks like a fairly detailed technical documentation with pinouts, level specifications and timings.

For those who aren't registered in BFL forums: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/50609214/BFL%20SHA2%20Spec%20Rev2.2%20-%20Release-1.pdf


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: Lucko on June 16, 2013, 04:42:35 PM
For those who aren't registered in BFL forums: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/50609214/BFL%20SHA2%20Spec%20Rev2.2%20-%20Release-1.pdf
Thanks!


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: newmars on June 16, 2013, 06:43:40 PM
thanks for sharing
will take a look

Documentation.
Wasn't that published?
Chip data.

https://forums.butterflylabs.com/announcements/3014-butterfly-labs-announces-bulk-chip-sales.html
I'm not registered so I can't download PDF... But I thought that was that...
Yes, I looked through the PDF and as far as I can tell it actually looks like a fairly detailed technical documentation with pinouts, level specifications and timings.

For those who aren't registered in BFL forums: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/50609214/BFL%20SHA2%20Spec%20Rev2.2%20-%20Release-1.pdf


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: Lucko on June 16, 2013, 07:04:56 PM
This supposed to be PCB schematics

https://forums.butterflylabs.com/announcements/3295-bitforce-sc-pcb-schematics.html


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: 2weiX on June 18, 2013, 07:42:56 AM
I have 32 codes that I would be willing to put forward to this groupbuy if there is a real chance (as in "100%") that there is a EU-based (preferred: burnin) assembly that provides "ready to run" rigs/boards/blades.



Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: nottm28 on June 18, 2013, 11:38:28 AM
watching (with 8 chip credits)


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: ziptie on June 22, 2013, 06:23:29 PM
The only bumping being done by BFL consists of white powder going into their noses, conveniently purchased from silkroad with all of your BTC. It's only a matter of time until josh goes out Scarface style.

Lol :D This company seriously has gone off the deep end.  One thing is for certain, their goal is to remain profitable as long as possible, do you think that can be achieved by flooding the market with ASICs?  Nope.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: RandyFolds on June 22, 2013, 06:48:12 PM
The only bumping being done by BFL consists of white powder going into their noses, conveniently purchased from silkroad with all of your BTC. It's only a matter of time until josh goes out Scarface style.

Lol :D This company seriously has gone off the deep end.  One thing is for certain, their goal is to remain profitable as long as possible, do you think that can be achieved by flooding the market with ASICs?  Nope.

It is likely that their highest achievable profit margin is splitting right now, unless some wild new tech is being developed by their assembly ninja in a super secret underground development facility. The source of all their shipping delays is likely their ceaseless work on the development of the Schwarzgerät, which will be installed in the mysterious jet black 1.5 petahash miner housed in an erotic Imipolex G case with serial number 00000.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: Inaba on June 22, 2013, 08:54:54 PM
The only bumping being done by BFL consists of white powder going into their noses, conveniently purchased from silkroad with all of your BTC. It's only a matter of time until josh goes out Scarface style.

Lol :D This company seriously has gone off the deep end.  One thing is for certain, their goal is to remain profitable as long as possible, do you think that can be achieved by flooding the market with ASICs?  Nope.

It is likely that their highest achievable profit margin is splitting right now, unless some wild new tech is being developed by their assembly ninja in a super secret underground development facility. The source of all their shipping delays is likely their ceaseless work on the development of the Schwarzgerät, which will be installed in the mysterious jet black 1.5 petahash miner housed in an erotic Imipolex G case with serial number 00000.

God damn it, Randy.  Who leaked our design documents to you?  FFS.  BTW, it's not jet black, it's matte black, for stealth.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: KyrosKrane on June 26, 2013, 09:55:18 PM
Keeping an eye on this.  I'd be interested in plug-and-play miners, not individual chips.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: CanaryInTheMine on June 26, 2013, 10:14:42 PM
I was at BFL today to drop off payment for my group buy's chips.
Company is legit, I met Dave and Jody, who by the way is super sweet and very nice, so please be nice to her!!!
People were there working away. I thought that the office space/location was very appropriate given the current growth/stage of BFL: not unnecessarily fancy and also not in a low cost location, just about right.


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: Lucko on June 27, 2013, 07:06:31 AM
I wish they would answer mail more often... For example I still don't know how long will I have when I get a notice that I need to pay other 50%...


Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: tvbcof on June 29, 2013, 04:42:08 AM
I was at BFL today to drop off payment for my group buy's chips.
Company is legit, I met Dave and Jody, who by the way is super sweet and very nice, so please be nice to her!!!
People were there working away. I thought that the office space/location was very appropriate given the current growth/stage of BFL: not unnecessarily fancy and also not in a low cost location, just about right.


I wonder if giving them money made them 'super sweet and very nice'?  Did Dave show you his knife?



Title: Re: 65 nm Chips - [BFL ACCEPTED 100% ESCROW by John K.] - Group Buy #1 - Kernel32
Post by: CanaryInTheMine on June 29, 2013, 04:48:43 AM
I was at BFL today to drop off payment for my group buy's chips.
Company is legit, I met Dave and Jody, who by the way is super sweet and very nice, so please be nice to her!!!
People were there working away. I thought that the office space/location was very appropriate given the current growth/stage of BFL: not unnecessarily fancy and also not in a low cost location, just about right.


I wonder if giving them money made them 'super sweet and very nice'?  Did Dave show you his knife?


no, he didn't... I was a suprise from what I've gathered...  I think Inaba though I was bs'ing him when I PMed the day before stopping by but maybe not, dunno for sure.
Although I would have loved to see Dave's knife!  I'm known to travel with several kinds of tools myself  ;D