Bitcoin Forum

Hi,

I see a lot of great projects..
But also a lot of project which I don’t like.


Here is why
Not every project needs blockchain. Or not every blockchain project will survive.
In a project you need also a good businessplan and marketing.

Example
I saw Friendz which is a social media project. Nice plan but don’t think it will replace Facebook because
it is in blockchain. You need a lot more.. A LOT MORE to best orher companies with a centralized system.

Be carefull and good luck with your investment

I Agree. Now just everyone is doing different projects adding to them the word blockchain and start the ICO. And is it necessary in general? And is it necessary in blockchain? Just want to collect easy money

Yes, you are right. Some projects are scam and such project is faced with dump at a point, where the developer would have dumped all his coin and leave other holders to struggle with the remaining until it is dead.
Some of these projects eventually do not list at good prices, after listing on exchanges.

Yeah cant argue with that, sometimes people come with really weird project but its not completly their fault anyway, i mean if there a demand there will be another person become suplier right ?

Of course, because some of them are really copy cat of a previous project, they just added few variations and changed the name, so if you are really into crypto investors you will notice this a lot and most probably won't invest on those.

That's why we should use our common sense here. You need to filter out every ICO that's been popping around and not just joined because of the hype that surrounds it. And later turns out to be a scam.

Interesting you to put Friendz, because the moment I see this project, I have a good chuckle and I agree that it will face a hard time to succeed but who knows. But at this point, I will not put any investment on them. Sorry.

Definietly agree. People are trying to blockchain everything. Let's be honest. A blockchain for dentists?! Who is going to accept tokens for dental procedures and who is going to buy them to pay for these procedures? I think in the next few years we will see plenty of blockchain tokens die off. Darwinism for crypto. As for Friendz- Steemit is proving that wrong. Facebook is going downhill from here. Give it another few years and it's going to go the way of Myspace. This is mho

I prefer a unique project, meaning the implementation of blockchain on something new and certainly will facilitate human life, I'm sure such projects will be a huge success

You are absolutely right and not every project is worth, but all of them want to raise money. We have seen some really absurd ideas that are trying to adopt block-chain technology.

I noticed this as well.  People are trying to bank off the word blockchain by adding it to every single project they can think of and then starting their ICO sales.  There are many scenarios where trying to transition to blockchain is not worth it or too complicated, making it not worth the effort. 

I can tell you some similar project as friendz tried to replace the existing one in our life which is not possible in my opinion just like matchpool tried to replace tinder but it less on the adoption and it will never have happened.
We don't need companies with centralized system but we need more companies to discovering the new problem and give the innovative solution.

True. There are so much projects that are now leaning on to blockchain and they all think that its part of the project though there's no need of it. There's no use for them to take part of it and for those projects that are failing in the mid-run, they only took the money of their investors.

Not all projects that has good business plan and marketing becomes successful.

I agree that many projects will fail. And I also agree that friendz won't replace facebook.
But it's a good idea to use blockchain technology for a social media. What's the problem?

There's no problem if you'll use or upgrade a present service/social media entangled with blockchain. As long as the developers of it are working hard and happy to see their project is operating, they will not take a look at short term success. Facebook didn't became successful overtime, it took so many years before it has been recognized worldwide. I agree that many projects fail and the main reason of it are;
- the project isn't needed by the community.
- the developers are not serious with it.
- the project is a joke.

I agree with you, not all projects need a blockchain integration. If the platform is doing just fine on its own, why change it into blockchain based, if that is only going to cause problems. You got to ask yourself with every project the question: "Are they solving real-life problems with integrating?" If they are, then I guess the project has a good future. But if they are just copy pasting established platforms with blockchain integration in order to earn, then this is bad. At least in my opinion. :D

virtually none of them have a long term future.

in 5-10 years there probably won't be more than 3-5 projects around that are around now. all of the thousands of others will achieve nothing and fail.

even after all this time hardly anyone has figured out what use a blockchain actually has out in the real world and i think it's gonna take many more years before we do. right now it's still in the solution looking for a problem phase.

no one should stay married to anything. keep a long term position by all means but take that profit and then some when the opportunities arise.

Thank you for your warning and I will be more careful in the future.

I think the same as you. Many projects will not succeed in the long term because the competition is too big, but you also have to say that many projects simply do not have a good team, advisor or marketing. but there are also many projects that are just too slow to work and take too long to develop their blockchain, so projects that quickly bring a working product to the market will also prevail.

Successfully of the project depend on many factor, that is team founder, aim of the project, development of the project, unique project and benefits that they offer , and support from the community. There are new project and ICO everyday that mean alot of competitor in the market and some of them will fail. And 90% project failed because the team founder not professional and does not have any inovation to make their product more interesting.

Especially now many ICOs are not clear. which usually ends a scam.
indeed only the top 10 of the best Coinmarketcap for the future!

People are seriously just trying to profit as much as possible in this ICO rush. Lots will collapse and die and only a few will prove their worth.

We already know that apart from the newbies. But do you know any project that has a chance to be successful? I reckon you don't, the same as me.

In any case, I would like to see the list of the projects that you think will be successful just to see if you heed your own advice. Thank you.

True, a lot of projects now smell like soft scam,
I mean their business model still can run without token, or in other words token doesn't add value.
Wiseman said in order to beat existing company you will need to do 10x or 100x better.

This is correct, even if it has great potential, ico has been successfully held, and there will be various problems after the project enters the implementation stage.

Yes, you are right. Sometimes developers are so much more optimistic than they really are. I, as an investor, remain at a loss, exactly how they will compete with large business sharks. Of course, we can assume that any project occupies a certain place in the economic niche. But will it be so profitable to justify these investments that go to ICO? This is the main question.

To be honest the decentralised project doesnt need to prove themselves in front of the centralised one as it is completely different thing. I mean the working nature for both of them is different and they works on their own principle. The user base completely different and you can not beat the crypto market itself as you can both social here and earn some extra bucks too. Just keep in mind that comparison comes in when two projects are having the same level of development. I know many projects which are in competition with the social platform like Facebook. The name is Sociall, a decentralised platform and worth than Facebook considering Facebooks recent acts!!

That's why I prefer to invest in blockchain platforms. Here you need blockchain for sure, level of hype is usually much higher and success investments more often than fail.

The reason may be not only in the unpreparedness of the team or ignorance of the process, but the fact that it is more profitable for them to collect money on pre/main sales and leave  :D

It is as if some projects developers do not know the exact meaning and significance of blockchain technology. All they want is profit, where most are created for selfish interests. One thing i know is that, if there is any project, that does not put its value into consideration, may not really go far, which means that it might fade away soon.

Most projects need not deploy their projects on blockchain. They can be accessed off chain and because  everyone wants a funding and easy money, today every project not only launches on a blockchain but also has their own utility tokens. These services can still be paid for with either ETH or Bitcoin.

you mean to say they already planned it to scam people? yes some ico does but not all because there is still few of them that are legit and does their job verry well. Some are dedicated to their project and wont get tempted to runaway the collected funds allocated for the project itself. not all projects on the blockhain has a good future because some of them are poorly built or lacking of budget in order to support their developments but i think if many people do give their support for those project, i dont think they'll failed at the end.

that's right. there are so many projects right now, so it's difficult for them to differ one from another. and it's getting harder and harder every day for nice and worthy projects to clean their way to success.

Your statement is totally true, personally I don't like projects that have nothing to do with blockchain, but are just in the space to use the blockchain hype to raise fund for their project, I think this is what Friendz and some of these projects are doing, Facebook as the strong hold of the social media platform and will take something great to displace them from that top

I support the author, in places it seems that it is just some misfortune to push a blockchain to all spheres of life, even there where he is really displaced and isn't necessary. My example where the decentralized management with the help a blockchain was described as something new it is Uservice, under repair cars the blockchain isn't necessary.

I quietly agree with you and when you look around the forum you will see that out of many ICO which is listed only few are really worth and really need the technology. when you read many of this project whitepaper you will realize some of them dont need blockchain technology because they have not convincingly explain what exactly they want to use it for. all you see them saying is that they want to reduce transaction cost and transparent data processing and storage.

More like most of the ICO project will die since they are made just to earn a quick buck.
And not every project needs a blockchain but ICO is a good way to rise money which would be very difficult otherwise.

Not sure if social platforms need blockchain or not, but which I feel needed is PRIVACY.

Facebook, Twitter & Google doesn't give us any privacy.
If you flirt with a girl even if you have a wife - they know everything. Even if you fart, they know about it as well.

They take access and keep records to your contact list, media and many other things which we may not know. WHERE IS OUR PRIVACY?

This is the wild west of projects popping in on a daily basis and the possibility to make or pool money with a small amount of advertisement will encourage more people to come up with ideas that will attract people and most of them are not even having plans to complete the project after pooling in the money and these practices should be stopped and we need to regulate these new projects.

Before a good business plan and marketing strategy is achieved, there should be a good team behind it first. A great set of people with enough experience and skills will allow the project's smooth sailing. Also, from great people, great ideas will be produced as well.

It is important to check, not only the project's white paper, so on and so forth. Check the team behind it. If they have handled successful projects in the past, then you can consider investing on their new project.

Agreed. There actually has to be a purpose of blockchain use otherwise project will fizzle out.

of course.The reality of the matter is that for now decentralized systems cant beat centralized systems given the fact that majority of people are more into and are used to centralized systems and also the fact that these centralized systems spend a  ton of money to market and beat their competitions.Probably in the near future there will be a shift to decentralized systems.Most of these blockchain projects are rushed and then they realize there alot of hurdles to cross then they get stuck.For example we cant expect most of these projects to beat banks in competition for now.

Yes, I agree with you. Each project has goals and benefits that may or may not be accepted by audiences. The more acceptable the more will attract investors who can grow the project. Project targets achieved certainly provide great benefits. In contrast, projects that fail most of those who do not reach their targets because there are no investors or products that are less desirable.

Many of the blockchain projects will fail because of this factors:

1. Project is just made to collect funds to scam investors.
2. Even if the project is good it did not collect enough funds to start the project.
3. Project does not provide and innovation to the target market or it just have many competition.
4. Project is not well thought.

That is why we shoud do a research first on what blockchain project we would want to invest our money and/or time.

5. Project does not have a good niche market and the platform does not have use for the future.
6. Project's future revenue is not feasible like any other ponzi schemes.

I would say its true and I agree about that because they will always have project that failed and I think its too bad because no demand on it, bad project or the team is too force the project so the project not go very well, but if there are good project you can get benefit multipletimes from it

yeah you are right, not every project needs blockchain, for me blockchains are need where trust is required, and it is obvious not every blockchain project will survive in the long run because they will die a natural death because there will be no real use value for it. So always be careful with project you invest in.

Although the project is good but if the team make wrong decision in development then it will not give maximum result, need great people and momentum. I think it is not only for blockchain related project but for all project.

I am  agree. Not all of blockchain projects will have success in future. I even think that most of projects which exists now will disappear in future, some of them, maybe very soon. But a little part of existing projects will very very successful. Its a pity but we can know which of them will die, which survive. We just can try to guess.

I think that this is true in all the industries. Not all the new players in an industry will be succesful , they need to stand out and to be better than the competiton in order to be succesful.
This is true for the crypto market, you just need to find those projects which are better than the competiton.

I agree to what you say. There are a lot of project that are very interesting at the beginning. But later the project becomes useless. So we really need to study the project very well before we invest to it.

   Agreed, not every project is worth investing in, due to its lack of a visualization of its future, not just the future of a projects goals, but a visualization of a projects direction. When looking for investments, one should consider the possible impact a project might have if it's on schedule to meet its goals, especially if it is an original and innovative idea.
   

I think that one of the key factors for the development and success of the project's blocking is marketing and advertising, because if people do not find out that there is a good project, they do not invest in it.

Regarding the social media project that you mentioned, I am also not convinced that it will replace Facebook. But there is good market for any such platform that shares its revenue with the users.

Unfortunately, it's true. I do not know if the attempt to regulate ICO will solve this problem. Most likely this will remove the bulk of the scammers. But projects that are real, but absolutely unpromising in nature will remain. I'm sometimes just amazed at how these projects can collect millions of dollars? How?

Even with a great concept or successful funding, we can't say anything successful yet if people won't be using the platform or product. It's hard to say upfront, but at least you could make assumptions yourself beforehand, just don't use the price as the indicator of success. Price will come only after the network has grown. other cryptos that have a steady price or stable price doesn't mean a successful one.

90% of startups will usually fail. In a short term they can raise after getting listed on the exchanges, however if those scam ico will be caught in a bear market, they will be wiped out from coinmarketcap.

According to the recent statistic, only 8 percent of the blockchain projects are becoming successful and implementing their products.

I would say otherwise - a small number blockchain projects really have a future. I think that only a third, maybe even less. There are to many of them..

I am very cautious about investing in ICO blockchain projects, as there is a very large amount of fraud, so you can easily lose all your money.

It is true and sometimes projects that are failing, they're not refunding the moneys they got from the investors. So we have to be more careful when choosing projects to invest.

I agree!!! Some projects in general with a not understandable idea, do not understand why they need a blockchain, purely to collect money, this is my opinion

This is correct. No one can predict their later development. We can only observe it from the perspective of development potential and prospect. There are too many problems to be considered in the further future.

Yes, you are right. Sometimes developers are so much more optimistic than they really are. I, as an investor, remain at a loss, exactly how they will compete with large business sharks. Of course, we can assume that any project occupies a certain place in the economic niche. But will it be so profitable to justify these investments that go to ICO? This is the main question.

Many investors on the wave of crypto popularity approached this issue with excessive ease and even frivolity, thinking that any crypto and sharpened project under it is capable of giving them a profit. As a result, money was spent on unpromising projects that did not justify their existence. ICO projects in the near future will reach a whole new level of quality and reliability, so working with them and investing will be more profitable and safe.

Of course, we can assume that any project occupies a certain place in the economic niches But will it be so profitable to justify these investments that go to ICO? This is the main questions .

you are very correct. it is a shame that projects which does not require the blockchain to do their work are getting onboard the crypto craze and are doing their own stuff. it all comes down to investors or contributors losing out their hard earned money...

i feel as if the craze is dieing out now though. let it go out so that good projects can stand to advance the blockchain technology.

Blockchain can be used in all aspects of technology. Especially the one that OP mentioned above. Even though the project is shit. Marketing is just the key to success. Let Mcafee hype that shit project and let's see how much fund they will raise.

The problem is that there are a lot of projects that are fake, they try to do something that they can not achieve after all. Just like it happened with a lot of ICO projects in the past.

Yeah, looks like many project just understand how popular blockchain right now is and only try to collect more money.

I wait moment when will begin time when most of projects will show developments then it will be clear. Same situation with .coms, global corporations survived  and everything has come in a quiet tendence.

I do agree with your idea. There are many blockchain and only the best will survive and be used in the real world. As you can see, bitcoin, ethereum, NEO, litecoin are very promising. I have the strong belief that they will all be accepted in a near future

Truer words have never been spoken. People seem to flock to a project just because it has its own blockchain forgetting that there are coins that do not have their own blockchains that are doing better than coins with their own blockchain

I agree, even if the ICO offers that they have an exclusive blockchain, it takes time for them to be able to fully function it and apply it on their platform. I have seen coins that they offer their own blockchain, some of it has been successful, and the rest of it is just a failed project, even some ICO that has a blockchain didnt reached its softcap. So before you invest, make sure to do your own research first.

Of course, not everyone, in my memory, had ideas with a sawmill, cemetery and other projects. Ie they try to screw the blockade everywhere, without thinking that there it is absolutely not needed and will not receive any development or support.

There are a lot of copy project and there are really crazy projects. There is no way to every project has a future, i think more than 60% projects is scam

We must to screen it and filter it before we joined any certain blockchain project we need to select it properly a potential one and can be marketable in real world participating any one of them can also attract other member to join also be sure to pick the idealistic project.

yes I agree with you because I know a lot more people believe with altcoin that has blockchain technology and I like this coin that is Ethereum and Bitcoin because these two coins have a profitable blockchain technology and then why do you say if not all the blockchain project have a future, and what might you be deceived

Of course, a lot of projects based on blockchain appear on the world market . They need to study well and those that seem unfit to you should follow in the trash.

Yes, it is true that not all projects are real and not a scam. You need to choose wisely on the project that you are going to join. Some techniques are gathering information, researching about the project and make a background review about that activity.

I think personally, I'm alike with you because already Many projects will not work in the long run because the competition is too big, but you also have to say that many projects do not have good teams, advisers, or marketing. but there are also many projects that are too slow to work and take too long. not all projects require blockchain integration. If the platform is running well, why turn it into blockchain based, if it will only cause problems.

Another person become demander. And the fault sometime comes from team who has no ability and experience to manage a project.
Because team is very important. Great idea can not be great if its not supported by good experience team.

That is true, not all will become successful. There will be a loser at the end of the year. The strongest one will become successful which will prevail their legacy in the entire world with their excellence.

I completely agree with this statement. There have been a recent uptick of projects, which are just copy/paste ICOs of the same thing over and over again. And most of them is a project which I do believe does not really need a Blockchain. We need to find a way to sort out the good ones from just the money grabs.

basically, to choose a project, as an investor and bounty hunter we must really understand about the project that will be followed. now there are many scams ico and it makes a lot of people get the loss, therefore we should be able to choose a good ico to invest.

Actually alot of them dont have much of a future. Only the best will survive.

Very true and very good use of a simple example.

Hopefully examples like this, that clearly show why not all ICOs are real projects, will serve to educate the majority of people who blindly buy into ICOs expecting tremendous gains. Education is a step towards and mass adoption. The more people become savvy with cryptocurrencies the sooner it's true value will be realized.

the blockchain is a great technology but it can not be applied to all things. many projects are sometimes not very suitable for blockchain so if this is applied to an in-flight therein are certainly less get the maximum appeal. so I think the implementation of blockchain should also look at what projects will be applied in order to sync.

Exactly.  All the projects that we see combine with the blockchain, and throw them on the ICO, just to get the investment!

So every want to determine where investments do not just see the movement of its coin prices alone, it could have made us deceived. Determining where to invest by looking at the token project is the best thing, although it will meet DUMP, but with confidence the token will have a stable price if the crypto currency market returns a bull run. Many token projects fail to compete in the market and leave only their names because they do not have a good function to make investment for the future.

Blockchain projects often fail after the end of the calling period because 90% of the plans do not attract enough capital to develop their projects. Many projects get worse and fail after being listed on the first exchange.

A lot of projects/coins in the cryptocurrency market won't be there in the next 2 years. It's not just a situation of block chain projects.

The majority of blockchain projects don't even understand about what is the meaning of the blockchain itself. In fact that they are creating a non sense thing which mentioned the decentralized system to create FOMO.
Not all of cases can use the blockchain system

Obviously, not every business has a future either.

Yes, many blockchain projects do not require ICO.
So I think that's the problem with most projects right now, maybe they don't need blockchains. ;D

Blockchain is something which I love most. You have to understand something before doing anything. Most of the investor in this crypto place they know nothing they just want only profit. They know only someone who has doing gr8 profit by using blockchain. But it's a matter to understand where are you investing your fortune.

Think twice before investment because now a days most of the blockchain are scams. If you think deeply most of them will fail in some years. Now people will ask me what makes me think that then ask your self what you give to return to them by using your chain system right? Why you think it will work I mean seriously why where most of the people are including in this system.
It's like buying a house and you are the ones who pay rent to someone else to live in your house funny inst it? My advice to all the new be who are involving in blockchain system plz understand the market 1st coz there are lots of wolves is this market pace who are eagerly waiting to cheat your valuable money form you.

The problem of our world that startups are getting money too slow or no money, so they switched to blockchain and thats why there is a lot of project which dont need blockchain.

I agree with the author completely. Not all projects need blocking and vice versa, many projects need, but they do not. Well, the market should always be considered.

Of course not all projects are going to survive, in fact less than 10% of the projects are going to last in the long term. For a project to be successful it needs continuous development happening for it and an active community, without these things a project cannot and will not survive.

Actually this is true that not every blockchain project has a good future because there’s a lot of competitors who tried to compete to the quality and price to attract investors in this kind of business.

That’s obvious, more than 50% of projects die within 1 or 2 years. Even the profitable ones come to an end, not to mention the projects made by inexperienced developers aching for fast money. I guess only 5-10% of the projects we see now can survive next 5 years.

That is the true, we should always consider that thing
because in business career not all people will be granted a success because there are times lots of people fail and suffer from major loss and burden.

Whatever has no good usecase that is applicable to its set goal should not be invested in. As a matter of fact, research every project and test its genuineness. I believe all projects on blockchain should have a good tech with good application.

At this moment there are so many bad and senseless projects on the market. I think only 5-10% of them have chances to survive and achieve something.

A lot of projects are trying to get money and that is the end. They don't care about community, investors, etc. Most of projects don't need blockchain as technology and transparency!

No doubt about that.  Not all project got a workable product, most are just into it to make money for themselves and move on to the next phase. This has become order of the day as more project keep springing up on daily basis.

The fact that a project is listed on the blockchain, doesn't guarantee its success in the market. For some, it's just a good way to promote their shitty coins. I have heard of so many cases where a blockchain project failed. There are lot of scam coins there, just be careful on what you choose  to invest in.

You couldn't be more right.

The reason is simple - the unregulated ICO structure has allowed for opportunistic groups to make money from posturing and speculation, meaning that many projects out there lack the tech or partnerships to have any real future in this space.

The irony is that many of these projects garner more investment and support from investors owing to their marketing allowing for price fluctuations, whereas investors are often put off by more long term and legitimate projects. This is Crypto in a nutshell.

But with regulation soon to be kicking in, I wouldn't be surprised to see a shift in people's priorities.

Website - https://energitoken.com/
Telegram - http://t.me/energitoken
Twitter - https://twitter.com/EnergiMine]
Medium - https://medium.com/energitokennews
Reddit -   https://www.reddit.com/r/EnergiToken/
Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/energi.token/?hl=en
ANN - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4629116.0
 

I actually consider on what you are saying. Yes, not all of the blockchain projects have a great future ahead. We understand that investing in these projects are risky in a whole new level, because most of them were not backed by established companies. However, I do believe that greater risks come greater rewards. We just have to be good enough in choosing a project that has an amazing roadmap, backed by an established company or insititution, reputable team members with established LinkedIn accounts and so on. Just my two sats.

I agree, most of the project that is being launched lately is about launching their own blockchain, the investors will be interested since it is something new, something that will make them profitable, but not all of them become successful.

Only the strongest survive. Not all projects can have a good future ,with prospects .

I believe a good future for any project. Is in effective work. And also in the improvement and promotion of this project. You need to constantly monitor everything and adjust. And unfortunately, not all developers do it.

Numerous speculators on the flood of crypto fame moved toward this issue without hardly lifting a finger and even unimportance, suspecting that any crypto and honed venture under it is equipped for giving them a benefit. Therefore, cash was spent on unpromising undertakings that did not legitimize their reality. ICO extends sooner rather than later will achieve an unheard of level of value and unwavering quality, so working with them and contributing will be more productive and safe.

ofcourse. most of us are aware that even 90 percent of the existing blockchain based projects are crap. they just launched their ico to collect money and that is it. they dont care about the roadmap or the product at all.

the blockchain technology still new, and there are a lot of problems to solve. I think they need more time to overcome the traditional technology.

I absolutely agree, and I think, moreover, most Blockchain projects have no future because of their out-of-date nature and huge competition in the field, there is simply no room for everyone.

The perfection in the development leads to the success of the project. When it comes to blockchain, people find this to be entirely new. Even high profiled developers find it difficult to program. Slowly things will progress as more and more developers were getting into blockchain development finding its effectiveness.

Totally agree with you, People should not aim for alternative project of popular service, eg - Facebook Social Network rather than they focus on unique yet needy project which helps to make the future better and secure. 

But the fact is that the plan is only a formality for the whitepaper, while the facts in the field are not like that. The ICO project = the project collects money from investors then throws junk coins in the exchange market, investors don't get the profits they want, while the developer team makes profits outside their target. Except for ICO projects that have teams of big people in the cryptocurrency world  :D

All because many developers are not set on the long-term development of the project, which is promoted. Money decides everything, and when a lot of them-even more so.

I absolutely agree that many projects are likely to die, just as many will be created. Competition in this area is growing rapidly and will survive as always only the strongest.

What the OP stated is a business fact. 
Before starting or investing in a project, the demand should be considered because without demand for the project it will fail no matter the money raised in ICO.

Yes,I'll agree with you that we are here just trying to have an extra income for our daily needs.But sometimes it can be successful and it cannot.

Truly, I concur with you. Each task has objectives and advantages that might possibly be acknowledged by groups of onlookers. The more satisfactory the more will pull in financial specialists who can develop the undertaking. Task targets accomplished surely give incredible advantages. Interestingly, ventures that flop the greater part of the individuals who don't achieve their objectives on the grounds that there are no financial specialists or items that are less attractive.

Absolutely. Many projects do not think ahead. They want here and now. And how do we know that blockchain projects are based on a long-term perspective.

Of course, not every project needs a blockchain. But if you look far into the future, then we will see that our whole life is happening in the blockchain. All actions are recorded and stored there. Therefore, perhaps the developers are right that they do all the projects on the blockchain technology.

Course I do. Using a block chain does not guarantee 100 percent results. You need to invest in your project and control it.

Yes that was true. We cannot deny that every project will succeed. Some projects were lacking of investors that's why they turned out to be a failure. Others were left by tge developers. No matter how other projects failed, atleast they have tried it in blockchain basis.

I think you are very right and correct.
Alot of projects don't even need to waste their time because the niche they are focusing on is already taken and their project doesn't have a solution or a wow factor that would disrupt that particular space.They end up wasting investors resource because more than half of those projects end up dead.

This is the truth many of the projects launching on blockchain are real garbage, some times when I finished reading some Whitepaper I just imagine how some people could so naive as to invest in such projects because just from reading the Whitepaper you should be able to know that they will have little to no future.

Oh, absolutely. There is just not enough space for all of these projects to thrive in and competition strips us down of the projects that can't compete or grow.

It all depends on the quality of the project. If the developers came to the point with all the subtleties, the project can have good prospects.

I agree with OP as i am seeing lot of good projects whose value is almost 90% down, ya it is true that this project is running good but right now the price has gone more then 90% down but cannot say of future as the project is running good and it can give you lot of profit if you can hold 1 or 2 yrs.

Numerous speculators on the influx of crypto prevalence moved toward this issue without hardly lifting a finger and even paltriness, imagining that any crypto and honed venture under it is fit for giving them a benefit. Therefore, cash was spent on unpromising ventures that did not legitimize their reality. ICO extends sooner rather than later will achieve an unheard of level of value and dependability, so working with them and contributing will be more productive and safe.

I think that developers are thinking that only by getting into blockchain their project would be succesful, I mean, blockchain is indeed the technology of the future but it still has to be done the right way.

Of course, I agree! The success of any project will depend on who is behind it, as well as on many external circumstances.

Most of the projects doesn't need blockchain at all actually. They made ICO only to collect more money that they wouldn't get from VCs. As for social media platforms they need some combination of centralized and decentralized systems for fast work and censorship resistance.

Most new projects fails because they are only to make easy money. It do not make sense some ICOs prizes when they are only copys, but there are lot of people who is investing their money on them; they create demand, and some smart guys are ready to create offers.

If the ICO project based on Blcokchain wants to be successful it should be different from other people.
If Friendz ICO duplicates the yga system on Facebook.

Yesterday I also saw the HOWDOO Project and the project failed too.

We should just think about it, if all the project has good future or success, then tons of people will invest into blockchain project but that's not the reality. instead, it's called natural selection where the weak lose and the strongest survive
about investor it's not a death sentence to a project, lack of investor could still make the devs continue the project to the point where it can be a huge success, just see some airdrop project that's still holding until now.

Right! Not all blockchain projects have a good future. China, for example, has had many policies to support blockchain development in the country, but blockchain projects in China are mostly "sinking" gradually. The success rate is very low.

Yes. Lots of projects have been started after seeing the bull runs in last year. Some project have been launched only by targeting collecting the money. As the OP said, some projects don't even need the Blockchain technology. So we have to select the projects very carefully before investing.

blockchain technology may indeed constitute a good technology to use. and it's true it's not all of it can be applied in a variety of ways. Sometimes there are some systems that do not fit or are not supposed to be blockchain there is in it but the overall technology blockchain itself well enough to use.

It seems like the past 12 months everyone believed they could create a new Blockchain project and cash in on the boom times since the Bear market hit us all of that excitement has been muted as most people have lost money on ICO projects. Similar to most new businesses I think a lot of the crypto projects launched will fall by the wayside and the tokens left held by people will be worthless so people should be careful with the projects they choose to invest with.

Yes it is right every blockchain has not bright future. I saw too many are here on crypto to just collect money, they donot have vibal project and in some projects you can see they donot have even team for marketing. How these projects will success they all are scam, they are here for just collect money. So I suggest every bounty hunter to beware of these fake bounties and if you see this house that is fake so tell others also to avoid them. Before starting bounty spend your full time to check whether this is good or scam .

Yes, certainly. Many projects have failed and are not being further developed. Such projects most and the price of the coins lying at the bottom.

Of course, probably a lot of people know about this, but all the same now it seems to me that people very early start talking about the fact that crypto currencies can really change the world, I think that they simply will not be given the opportunity to do it.

I think you are right, I admit many good projects, but stopped in the middle because of their lack of business plans. But we should support all forms of development in order to be better, especially in the world of cryptocurrency.

You're right.. not every project becomes successful... For the ico project to become successful, it is necessary that a good, really useful product is behind it. And a strong team promoted this product...

I fully agree with you. This is really so and this fact upsets me. But alas, we are nothing with these I can not do, as this is outside our area of influence. So that this phenomenon, can change only over time and the not fact. Since the blockchain technology itself implies that it (the project, the idea) does not belong to anyone, therefore there is no one to take responsibility for such projects. Therefore, there is no one to punish for bad projects.

Agreed. Since the future is more for the idea itself, or rather the project that will use blockchain, success always depends primarily on the quality of the product. For example, there may be such a situation that some product on the blockchain will start well, someone will earn money on this and throw it into the corner of weekly projects !

Of course, not even bitcoin will survive forever, but it is unclear if the latest chains that are technologically advanced may be the winners for a long term.

Yes of course you are right, now under the technology of blockchain trying to adjust everything that comes to hand, although not everything is suitable and there are many existing systems that have earned the respect of society without the use of blockchain. It is impossible to invest thoughtlessly in such projects, it is necessary to study projects before investing in unnecessary copies.

I see so many projects also.. so many all trying to cop cat steemit.com without any unique project. It is so true, not all blockchain projects has a good future some will just end up so soon because they are just a copy cat of another.

Of course, it is a huge work and communication technical characteristics of the PC, in order to make it good, safe and stable.

Blockchain doesn't mean success at all, I bet a lot of people believe it because it is a really innovative system at the moment, however it's potential isn't being squeezed the way it should be.

Ofcourse, the market has different motifs and not all will be successful even if it is connected to blockchain. Investors will be meticulous on choosing the right investment which has the highest potentials to compete into the market.

I think 5 or 10 percent is kind of excessive, that would mean that blockchain is being practically wasted at all, maybe 20 percent of the projects are promising and well made.

Agreed. Each blockchain is a unique technology, but there is a kind of competition between the blockchain, the struggle for the rate of cryptocurrency and users. One blockchain project becomes more efficient, investment, the other against the background of the previous one becomes unattractive and after a certain time fades into the background and "fades".

The whole market of cryptocurrency with blockchain technology is still evolving and how are we going to get to see what works and what doesn't if there is no testing, experimentation, boom and burst. This early growing pain of cryptocurrency activities is inevitable.

I agree that not every blockchain project has a bright future, because the topic of cryptocurrencies has not yet fully discovered itself.

You're right. Many ICO offer ridiculous ideas only so that their creators can earn easy money. Only 10% of ideas really need a blockchain.

Yes, I very much agree with you. There are some ICO projects that don't have any future scams, so we must carefully read the white papers and roadmaps of the project before investing in the ICO project to understand the authenticity of the work team. Wait, only those truly high-quality ICO projects are worth investing, and we should be cautious when investing.

Yes, I agree. Not always blockchain project is done by knowledgeable people, not always people count on their strength. The human factor is always present.

You are saying the damn truth, only few projects will survived. Apart from having a great idea and good intention building a business is not an easy tasks of which many projects' team may not have th needed capacity and experience

I'd rephrase that a little. Not all blockchain projects have a blockchain. That's why they don't have a good future. Only bankruptcy and oblivion, that's what awaits them.

Its true, many project just want to make profits for the team. Right now many different token or coin in market with similiar project. I am believe some of that will be death and not useable. Some coin worth to hold for long term and some dont.

Yes, it`s true. This is impossible for all projects be successful, only best ones and really needed will have future. We must analyze projects before investing in.

That's true, not every blockchain project has a good future. So that's why we have to understand the project well, or we will be trapped. It is very important for us to read any information about the project.

Not all the blockchain projects will survive, but  even social media needs blockchain. It does not mean that some project will replace Facebook, rather Facebook starts using blockchain technology. We could see these days when 50 million Facebook users were hacked. Personal data  protection needs blockchain.

For investors it is difficult to know the authentication of a project. Those who make money for themselves will no doubt die one day and they have no long bright future. On the other hand good projects run for long time and people also invest in those projects because they know that these projects are not scams and will not disappear from the market.

At the moment, I would say that almost every project that appears new fails, what can we say about a good future. After ICO, prices fall off very low, because of this, no one wants to invest in a project on ICO, and as a result, a lot of projects turn out to be scam projects, which greatly undermines confidence in ICO and crypto currencies in general.

Point is that majority of blockchain projects supposed to be s scam or changes their mind once collected money on ICO and these guys don't waste money on product development, they buy luxury things and pay marketing expenses to pump their token and get rid off their own tokens. Moreover each idea can be burried under competitors pressure and weak team and multiple of reasons. That's why not every blockchain has a good future.

Yeah you are right. Blockchain not related to all projects. I think that blockchain will never backup a project which is not authentic and reliable. They will never compromise on their image. People trust blockchain the most. They will only promote those projects which are doubtless in its reliability. You are right that a project which has no blockchain has no good future. People do not trust them at all.

I totally agree. Natural selection has not been canceled. It is the law of life - the strongest survive. The best technologies, the best platforms, the best marketers. Nothing else.

It is quite logical that not all projects will survive. The problem with most projects is that they focus more on the theoretical part of the issue, but when it comes to the implementation of technologies in real business cases, nothing happens. It's really complicated.

Decentralised social platform is good idea.
I'm not sure how much info about facebook censorship you have but it's BIG thing. Not even mentioning countries that censorship internet (yeah China, I'm talking to you).
20 years ago Internet was a decentralised network and that's why it thrived, now internet is in hands of giant companies and we need to move to something less controlled.

I agree with the author of this topic; There are many projects in which the block chain is used indirectly mainly for payment by coins, but there are projects that the block chain needs, I will give in the example of @swachhcoin. The project will pay people for their trash. At the moment there is a 10% bonus, you can buy coins by the end of October. I advise you to see the project.

Blockchain and cryptocurrency are now very popular and many people use it. Therefore, it is always worth studying the idea of the project before investing, because it may be so that his idea will be lifeless and useless. No matter how beautifully the road map and white paper were painted, if the idea was initially useless, then nothing will help.

There are some projects that are actually masterminded to rip people off and such projects no matter how much have been raised through ICOs are not going anywhere no matter how far they might have gone until now.

Exactly, even if the ico project has its own blockchain, surely we cant determine if it will be successful especially in a long run. We must go back and carefully read the whitepaper, if it is good in the long term and can it attract more investors to its features.

This is the truth, a lot of people tend to think that since something is a blockchain project then it is destined for greatness but that is not the case, The fact is that just because it is a blockchain project does not guarantee success of the project, it has its risks and there is always a likelihood that the project will fail if it is not properly worked on

In our time, it is quite difficult to come up with something. And there is always a startup, which later will be a fraud