Bitcoin Forum

What's more better,Firstly token listing in exchanger and than distribution token or distribution token before listing in exchanger?

I prefer token list from exchanger and from distribution token, because if the exchanger is clear the token will definitely be distributed especially if the token listing in the popular exchanger.

Distribution of tokens and then listing on the exchange it is a good start. Why not the other way around? If the token has been listing in exchange before distribution, it will happen price dumper caused by the hunter.

I observe that the tradition has been to distribute token before listing in an exchange. I'm thinking that the reason for that is to settle off the supporters of the project on time because most times, it takes a whole lot of time for tokens to be listed maybe because of financial constrain , and so, keeping participants also waiting that long might lead to bumping the thread unneccessily and hate comments.

But, I think any one that comes first shouldn't really matter if the management is sincere.

depends on the project, many projects are really hard to get listed and some are listed even before the tokensale ended.

Different actions with different benefits for each individual who are supporting the project. In my opinion, it's better to distribute the tokens first before the listing, why? simply because who would sell if there is nobody who got/hold the tokens? how could it circulate? the team would sell it on exchanges first after they conduct an ICO? Very no no.

To me listing a token in an exchange before distributing  is better. This will show seriousness on the part the developers and also give  sense of belonging to the investors and the promoters. Both the investors and promoters will be assured of reaping from their effort immediately distribution happens.

I think it's better listed on the exchange and then distribute tokens because it could close the possibility for early investors who get bigger discounts to take short-term profits by dump their tokens on an unofficial exchange.

Example; You can see some Tokens on Decentralized Exchanges, which use contract address as URL to their market

Distribute all of the token and then listing your token in exchange site., it's much better in my opinion consider you can try to make sure there was no investor that missing to get the token.
It will create a good situation for your token. If those investors have been getting when they deserve and then you can start your application to the exchange site and ask them to help you to vote your token.

I think the token unlocking should take place at the same time as the official launch of the exchange. If the token is unlocked in advance, it is easy for the encryption price to be lower than the offer price.

I think it's better to distribute token before listing in exchanger! So everyone who has the coins will be in the same conditions. Maybe I think foolishly, but it seems to me that it will be correct.

According to me at first the token needs to be listed and then it should go for distribution. After listing, the token will be able to get the confidence of the investors and listing will also help to have more efficient distribution.

Depends on how promising or popular the project is, some get listed in no time whereas others take time to get into the list. In my opinion, listing a token in an exchange before distributing is the right way to do it.

Distributing tokens and listing after distribution might be the better option but sometimes it depends on the project designed. Some projects are designed with listed before ecosale. Actually, it's the management's planning for their business.

Solely depends on the nature of the project, some are hard to get listed whereas others are not. In my opinion, listing a token in an exchange before distributing should be the way.

In my opinion it may vary time to time. But, I think it is better to distributre the token before exchanging.

It's been a normal thing for a token to first be listed in an exchange, before getting distributed. Almost becoming a tradition. I don't see anything wrong with it though, and since this has been working for them for a while now, why not go ahead with it?

When you say exchange it depends, if its cex or ddex . some ICO distribute to their investors so they can generate volume on ddex before going to cex. But better still if they on their own can list on cex exchange and distribute token. Investors can know how serious the project is.

The price dump is never caused by bounty hunters, it will be caused by the whales and pump and dump groups that have joined the ICO as they would have majority of the token distribution. But I agree with you as it can be dumped quickly by such manipulators it is a good way to start to distribute the tokens first then list the token in the exchange.

The projects or tokens which has good advantages and future benefits should get the highest priority. Token listing would be great for the investors to judge.

Two things are equally important, the distribution of tokens after getting the exchange then many will be happy and can be sold anytime. Only time is sometimes constrained and sometimes long.
Token distribution prior to exchange, this is also good because the holder already feels has a token but can not yet be sold because there is no market yet. It may also take some time to get the market and sometimes the holder is confused and afraid of being a dead token.

Listing before distribution will be a cause for market dumping of this token... Peoples will just start selling the token if they are already listed. But its not then they will wait and you can choice a right time to list it any exchanger. So distribution 1st and listing latter is right decision.

For me better distribution token firstly than token listing in exchanger. Due to if token listing in exchanger before the distribution, it will make the market fluctuacy going falling down immediately when the distribution. As you know, all bounty hunters always sell their token without thinking the effect will be caused. If sales more than purchases, then the price of coins or tokens will be meaningless.

Token distribution and follow by exchange is a good way to move. Many exchanges requires for more holders of the token before listing.

Both the ideas are looking good and both are practical and i personally face both the situations while trading the newly created cryptocurrencies. The best way I think first listing on the some best exchanges you have and then distributing the token by this way the members stay active till the distributions have not happened and also the Prices of the token doesn't manipulate a lot.

The best way I will suggest in a case like this is to distribute tokens first before listing, in fact, investors should gprequest for their token before any project will list on any exchange. One project listed before distrusting tokens to their investors meanwhile they have already distributed tokens to the advisers, it the advisers that dumped and killed the price of that coin and up till now it is struggling to rise.

I have witnessed tokens been listed after distribution and it is really not nice. Lots of dumping and the prices eventually dumps below ico price. But I am still observing this project that is already listed tho token distribution hasn't yet started.the outcome will inform my judgement on which one is better.

For investors, it is better that the distribution be after listing on exchanges. Since they can sell their bonuses (if they want) after ICO. And for me it is better) when I know how much I will get (even if the price will fall)

Good question.

A guess it boils down as to where the tokens will be listed. If its in a exchange that has a good reputation then I prefer it that way. But if the tokens will be just listed on a shit exchange and individual will just used it as a pump-and-dump scheme then its not good because I'm sure that the price will easily plummet. At least in a reputable exchanges, it will be hard to pump-and-dump it, in my view.

Actually listing the Token and it involvedness of exchange is really great because most of them follow this system also we can know about those from exchange also listing the token before in exchange is good I think because it will be more beneficial.

I chose token already listing on exchange, then distribution of coin division. If ico is listing on the exchange, then we can see the price of the coin sale and of course we can predict the price of coins for the future so that we can think of strategies to get profit.

both in my opinion very good depending on the developers in keeping the market prices remain stable and not decreased but what is currently mostly done by the project is the distribution and token list on the exchange

In my opinion is better to make the token in exchange first so that after the distribution, the participants can sell or buy the tokens on the official exchange, not in the other exchanges. It may be able to maintain the price. But, the difficulties are that the investors and other participants always force to get faster distribution after ICO ends.

Token should be distributed to ico investors first before listed on any exchange,,
Thats the right my friend

definitely listing token before distribution, if the tokens are distributed before a main listing then the tokens will be on DEX's straight away, with low volume it can be risky for the price

With the Token of ICO projects, being listed on exchange floors is the most important. The distribution may be delayed, but if the exchange floors listing is delayed, then the ICO project is not potential at all. So I like the ICO campaigns that the Token is listed before the Token distribution starts.

Everyone awaits the token list after the token is distributed. If token list first in my opinion is better. We can follow the development of token prices in the market and can make the token as a place of investment. Buying tokens for trading some people will see a token list at a good exchange place.

if you are unsure of the token project you should not list first let alone invest, unless you are sure that the token project that has not been listing will be successful, so it is safer you invest in coin that already exist in market, but do not miss to monitor token movement is because if you miss the info then it's a huge loss, remember invest should be the right time too

It's not good to list the tokens before distributing the tokens, this will favor some people and dis-favor some people, the best way to go about it is to list the distribute the tokens and make sire that everyone has gotten their tokens then you can list the tokens, this will be fair to everyone.

Seeing the list of exchanges before investing is the good decision. It makes sure the project has the vision. Almost good ICOs have their list in whitepaper.

The registered exchange will be better and can increase the trust of various parties, please note that token already registered it will be easier to know the circle and can be analyzed the existence of the token.

The best strategy as regards token listing on exchanges and distribution is often a Grey area for cryptocurrency projects. Some projects will announce their listing first then distribute while others will distribute then announce.
I believe for projects to have a successful listing and prevent price dump after exchange listings, exchange fees should be included in the projects budget and also bonuses should be reduced to lower than 30%. Bounty tokens should also be locked for a certain period to prevent bounty hunters from dropping  the market value of their tokens.

I always salute those companies that after every ICO of them, they're working right ahead with the token listing, and before they distribute the tokens either for the team, investors or bounty hunters, they're already listed. Its a sign that these companies were legit and has the potential to be atop in every category in crypto world.

The exchange site contains a lot of volume from the various place. The volume means the valuation. Anyways to be listed on the exchange site will be helpful to push the price of the token through give em' the more volume. You can understand the capacity as the demand to the token itself. That's the point any project interested to list their coin to the exchange site as soon as possible.

the best option of course is:
1 passing ISO, then paying tokens,
2 then listing on the stock exchange (preferably large), as a rule,
3 only so the price can rise.
If there are any big delays between these stages - the confidence will be on the project.

I always wait for a significant increase in the token after several listings on large exchanges, which in the long run gives very good results. Unfortunately, in the descending market, tokens tend to be at the bottom as well. So now we are waiting for the growth of the whole market.

I believe token listing on exchange is better because we can do the next step, buy and sell without worry about the market. In this situation many investor or trader take speculation before listing on exchange and that will create big dump, many coin become cheaper after listing. Part of the risk we will face it but after listing is the right option, you know the supply and demand in the right number.  

I personally prefer distribution done before the official release is announced. Distribution always takes time, and I think there will always be technical issues. So ensuring all distributed tokens may be fairer for all token holders, at least all tokens from participant ico have all confirmed.

For a long term investment the order does not metters at all. From the short term investor/trader points of view better will be to get tokens. Because trader can get token, send them to the exchange and at first trading minutes to sell them, especially if the exchange is - Binance. Usually coin pumps in the first 5-10 mins of the listing.   

But if we choose the token that has been listed in exchange, then the distribution of coins. If ico is listed on the exchange, then we can see the price of the coin sale and of course we can predict the price of the coin for the future so we can think of a strategy for profit.

Token listing before the disrtribution of token is a good way to attract more investors in your project.
this is a good thing to get more attention.
First secure a listing in a mid level exchanger.
then after the distribution go for one of the best exchange.

Will obcorse distribution first before listing in some exchanger because it is unfair to some late investors that some are already selling there tokens in the market and some are still not yet recieve there coins.

Maybe it depends on the coins ICO or crowdsale because some company are listing there coins in some market exchanger and doing there crowdsales to raised funds. But for me in my openion i do like distribution first before list in the market.

Actually, you might waiting until token official listed on exchange. After information about that and system was ready.

Tokens should be first distributed and then listed on exchange.
I took part in the bounty of the project which did it vice versa and its token fell almost 50% by the end of the campaign - imagine how frustrated all the participants were.

Usually of course there is a distribution and then the tokens go to the exchange .Naturally for the ico it is better otherwise they will not be able to raise funds .But after they go to the exchange price falls very quickly, as all who participated in the bounty or airdrop drain everything! So I would prefer first listing and then bounty

to me the best is to paid before listing it on exchange so that it will it's price, but once it's listed before paying earlier investors will spoil the market, so i suggest payment before listed so that the market it value.

I think I agree with your suggestion that it is better to distribute token first before listing on exchange site because this can help to build the trust of the community and it will also help to get good demands as long as the project is a good one with promising potentials.

Personally I preferred listing of token before distribution this will enable the hodler to subject the token to analysis before taking a decision of hodling or dumping I participated in volttech bounty and the token had already been listed while the token has not been distributed yet while this gives me room for a decision of dumping or hodling. a drop in the price of a token is usually attributed to bounty hunters due to dumping of course a prosperous coin will surely rise again.

I think listing of token on exchange at first and then distribution of it. If the tokens get listed first on Exchange, I think the market demand of it rises. So after distribution, there will be a demand in the market to buy the tokens. But it may vary according to the projects.

If token isn't listed you can get more profit. But it isn't a rule. Sometimes better to buy listed tokens. You should always make a project research.

For this crypto world and unregulated investment and transaction for a credibility and legitimacy of a token it is much better to list it on exchange first so that it will encourage more investor to buy those token and besides price dumping from bounty hunter has a little influence of the price since most of the bounty distribution is only 1 to 2 percent of the total supply of the token.

If I were to choose, I prefer to receive the token before listing. Because it's an assurance that I get what I have work for, like in bounty campaign. Though I usually don't dump coin in the exchange but I want to have assurance that I receive my share.

It will be more interesting if the token has been distributed before the centralization exchange begins. That way we can know the transparency of the developers about the number of tokens that have been distributed or sold, and the remaining unsold tokens. There will always be the possibility of transactions, on the dex market at a price much lower than the ico price, but on a good project it will not be a big deal.

I would prefer a distributed token first. Because then, some cheap tokens that are sold before the release will be purchased first.
So that way, most likely the opening price will be quite high, at least close to ico price.

it is much better if the exchange is available before the distribution, rather than the former distribution but the exchange is not necessarily available, much token distribution experience but until now the tokens are garbage, with the exchange available it means the tokens have been proven to have prices in the market

There are always advantages and disadvantages of each, because on projects with good communication, the community can have an influence to determine the strategy. I see recently the designated exchanger was aborted by the developer due to a distribution system error. But it may be very interesting, if the distribution is done after getting a deal with some exchangers.

I think it doesn't matter how long it takes to list the tokens, it can be at the beginning, in the middle or at the end, because I think that if the project is good there will be no need to keep the investors with the tokens, the developers can also apply a strategy like holding to give token rewards to the loyal investors who stay with the tokens until the end by multiplying their stakes.

I think it has to be listed first before distribution..We cannot say that hunters are the one causing the dumping of the token price, mostly hunters hold their coins specially if they have such a small portion of the reward.People joining the ICO,investors are playing with the price of the token since they hold more than the hunters

It’s always good to list on exchange first
Then have tokens locked until all investors token are shared, tokens remains locked until all bounty rewards are paid
And then trading can commence

I prefer that strategy

I prefer the token list in the exchanger so that once distributed we can sell the token and increase the confidence in the search of the token terrsebut, may be able to follow their token sales program.

I prefer cryptocurrencies that are listed on an exchange before distribution but it's all up to the exchanges to decide if they want to list a coin or not.  It's not up to the developers as everything is open source and exchanges can list a coin without the developers even knowing about it.

Most of the ICO gives the bounty rewards first before they work on the listing of that coin. But some other ICO just like MozoToken where already pre-listed at the coinrail while they are still running the crowdsale. I think if its a good project exchanges will happen at no specific time but I hope it will not take longer.

You are right. If the distribution of tokens and followed by exchanges is a good way. their token also has the advantages and benefits of the future that should get the highest priority. so they need better distribution first than the list of tokens on the exchanger. Because if the token list is exchanged before its distribution, it will make market fluctuations soon fall when the distribution.

In my own opinion, It was better to distribute the token before it goes to exchanger because in this way, there will be more people who is going to be capable of investing.

if the coin went to the exchange, and the distribution went, believe a large profit isn't worth it. But on the other hand, the coins of which are not yet on the exchange, and are being distributed, there are no guarantees that they will be added there.

I prefer to distribute tokens first before listed in exchange because usually if we already hold a token, it will be easily sold in the exchange. But the problem is that many dumping cases often occur when tokens are listed in less popular exchanges. moreover, it is the only exchange that can be used. it will be very difficult for us all.

My opinion is that the project must first withdraw its token to the exchange, and then within a month to transfer the tokens to its investors and bounty hunters.

Smile, if token is listed before distribution,then who are the ones selling in exchange. Dev Team selling or investors?
That would even cause more damage to a fresh project

It looks like the distribution of tokens once listed on the exchange will be better. This will eliminate the chance of buying and selling early and the potential of each other's blame.

You're correct mate anything comes first as long as team really cares for their commitment to the community who gives support to since from day one of the project and now comes up the paying period its their obligation to settle all necessary things on their part.

if  token distribution prior to the listing exchange is at risk for dropping token price if  smartcontract is not locked, most of the many who sell in the unofficial market (dex exchange) such as forkdelta / etherdelta it is better to list the official exchangers first new distribution of tokens

I prefer when the token first comes out on the exchange. So it is clear that the project did not deceive you, and you do not have to wait long for the token to enter the exchange.  Although I'm comfortable with both.

Token distribution after the listing is a good idea, but people will get too nervous waiting for them)) investors usually ask "when distribution?" in telegram groups the next day after the ico ends))) so admins will go insane)

Now many companies, as I see, are dragging out time before listing. Waiting for the market to go up sharply

It definitely varies in to what the project roadmaps have, but if your managing a project with this total supply and your existing circulation, it's way better to distribute 50% of the tokens and at the same time apply for listing, most of the exchanges requires a projects to have , community, circulating supply, number of wallet addresses that the coin/token have, and a set of volume to get listed.

In my opinion, such things as time of listing and so on are important only for coins, the purpose of which is price manipulation. For normal projects this generally does not matter.

If tokens distributed before listing in exchange , we can see how price fall down and people start panic sell. I don't like this situation.

I think there isn'tt much difference in this. If the token is quite popular and it is invested in a very large amount of money, then its price will not fall after entering the exchange.

I think distribution fierst would be better because atleast, participants or investors would be assyre that they will earn their tokens and waiting would be their only problem. If it would be listing that would be first, the investors would be still worried wether they will recieve their reward or not. But still, some users do prefer the other way around.

It should be token distribution first I know that sounds selfish for the bounty hunters but what happens today is people keep on dumping the price immediately so for it to be fair the tokens should be distributed then the token listing should follow so everyone could sell at the same time.

I think the second option (distribution token before listing in exchanger) is more preferable for users. Otherwise, who will trade these tokens on the exchange?

It really doesn't matter if project is legit, it does matter only if token is not legit and their creators want to dump all tokens on someone.
I prefer token distribution then listing on exchange tbh.

I read this topic and understand that the biggest part of people provide first example, but when this connect with this people, i am sure at 90% that they want token and only then - distribution.

First example more interesting to me. It's help to stabilize price of tokens and we can't see dump of tokens. To me it's necessary.

I think it is better to distributre the token before exchanging. it's much better in my opinion consider you can try to make sure there was no investor that missing to get the token.

I think it is better for a coin to be listed in an exchange first before being distributed to bounty hunters. It is important that people will be able to sell their coins after recieving it rather than waiting for too long for it to be listed until the prices of a coin drops down where we won't be able to gain a better profit.

I think that everyone is more suitable for the distribution and then listing. From the perspective of people working bounty, they are interested in getting a token first and then selling it as soon as possible through the ICO price in order to make the best profit.
Therefore, way of investor perspective as well as developers , is that they benefit from that by buying at lower price then they had when project was developed.

The first thing that should come first is token distribution and then follows by token listing. Without the former the later is just meaningless

it is greatly improved if the trade is accessible before the conveyance, as opposed to the previous circulation however the trade isn't really accessible, much token dissemination encounter yet as of not long ago the tokens are rubbish, with the trade accessible it implies the tokens have been demonstrated to have costs in the market

I think that the distribution of tokens and then listing on the exchange it is a good start. It is my personal view of how it must be but certainly is not always the case. That all you must read before using tokens.

hello! distribution maybe..? somehow i feel better about it. it's only personal opinion and experience, though. anyway, good luck with your ideas and its results ;)

it is better to enter the exchange first token rather than the token distributed but not yet enter the exchange, many ico projects when finished sales, the tokens have been distributed but not enter the exchange with a relatively long time, it makes investors losers with the occurrence of inflansi when the increase.

if listed on the market when the market price is experiencing a considerable decline in it seems to affect the price of the listed coin, it could be the price even directly decreased so sharply. because the time of entry into the market is the most decisive time

I think it's better to exchanges listing first, then distribution.
But these have a negative effect I guess. Due after the token distributed either after or before a token registered in the market, the price will decrease immediately.

Fot me  personally, is better listing on the exchange and then distribute tokens because in that way you really can earn if you invest. But it's up to you what to choose. Every project are different and situation can change in every day.

I think the best way is to ensure the distribution of tokens first to every investor and bounty hunters wallet, and then have the tokens locked against any form of transfer.

Then exchange listing gets finalized and resolved. before tokens are unlocked and traded on exchange.
this keeps everyone on a safe side.

Perhaps it relies upon the coins ICO or crowdsale on the grounds that some organization are posting there coins in some market exchanger and doing there crowdsales to raised assets. In any case, for me in my openion I do like dissemination first before list in the market.

Perhaps it relies upon the coins ICO or crowdsale in light of the fact that some organization are posting there coins in some market exchanger and doing there crowdsales to raised assets. Be that as it may, for me in my openion I do like circulation first before list in the market.

It is better to block token and unblock it after  listing on the large stock exchange. If they give tokens before the listing then they will appear on decentralized exchanges and its price will be very low.

That happened the price was very low because of the bounty hunters selling their token after distributing. Hunters are not mostly holding their token they are probably selling quickly their token share as a reward. And make the dumped the price of the token in the market and possible to not recover and make the token turn to cheaper price. So, it good to distribute first and then after a week list on the exchange.

I think token distribution before and then listing coin exchanges is a good order. Although investors can trade on the decentralized exchanges, I think this will help the tokens have more time to stabilize its value.

I would think if you could get it listed on the exchange first you would have a much better ICO/Airdrop with much more positive participation.  I think at this point any project which could debut with a coin already on the exchange it would far exceed anything a competitor could do without it the token listed. 

It's really on the project team's hand. Some of ICOs list it after the distribution, Some of ICOs list in exchange before the exchange. But I hope if the project has good future updates, list after the distributions is a good thing. Because of listing before distribution will cause to the dump the coin price. We all know how hard it happens in Etherdelta and Folkdelta. Many hunters sell their tokens at very cheap prices. This directly effects to the project. So I also believe list after the distribution is great than dump the coin price.

The best listing time for me is after the distribution end. It can be as soon as the distribution or wait for some period of time. Listing before ico end will cause bad dump for sure.

For me, it is better for tokens to be listed after distribution or at the end of the project. I think that is better.

There is no universal rule. So much depends on the state of the market. In a growing market, it does not matter, and in the falling market it is better to wait and not to do a token listing.

The best option is to lock token distribution after that listing on exchange should follow the last thing should be unlocking of token.

I generally sit tight for a huge increment in the token after a few postings on extensive trades, which over the long haul gives great outcomes. Shockingly, in the diving market, tokens have a tendency to be at the base also. So now we are sitting tight for the development of the entire market.

Why would there be listing before distribution of tokens. Except you are referring to bounty hunters receiving tokens after listing. As for investors, i expect they should receive their tokens first.

Any developer that lists before distributing tokens to investors needs to be suspected. I would even say that he has breached the rules of investment. Only put the horse after the cart and not the horse before the cart. So, listing should come first.
I have not also seen such a situation before. Although, i do not know if it had happened to anyone, but it is not a normal thing. Who would then sell if listing should come first.

The best option, in my opinion, is first a token distribution, then the launch of the project, at least the beta version, and after all this - listing on any exchanges! Only in this case it is possible to expect that the value of the coin on the exchange will not fall and on the contrary it will even grow!

what should be done is the distribution of tokens first, because it's useless if the token listing is done first there will be no trading movement because no one has the token yet

Even better solution is to first get the token on one of the top exchanges with intense daily volume. Then to do weekly distribution so that price will not be so low than initial and in the meantime it will have time to recover and be even bigger before next distribution.

Dear friend,
 I am a junior rank only, I think I want the token distribution first and then exchange listing on. At that time, you can control the price better. Especially, when the price go downtrend quickly, if you do not have anything, no more; but if you have tokens, yo can buy it immidiatly.

It will be much better that coin get listed before the distribution because if they will launch before the distribution then in that case people will have trust that they will be able to make easy buy much amount of tokens and also they will have positivity over to have tokens of that coin .
But in actual it doesn't happen the same , most of the times when we came across the ICO then we found that they are make distribution first and after that they launch the coin at worst exchange .
Here in the present time such works like to launch the coin after the distribution is leading into big scam , for exmaple KYC.legal token Results into a type of scam , they launched the coin at a useless exchange and there is no any type volume so that atelast we can make a small amount of money back of our Investment .
So keep in your mind always that ICO = scam , and nothing whatever they will do , only form own profit .

I figure it doesn't make a difference to what extent it takes to list the tokens, it can be toward the start, in the center or toward the end, since I imagine that if the undertaking is great there will be no compelling reason to keep the financial specialists with the tokens, the designers can likewise apply a procedure like holding to give token prizes to the devoted speculators who remain with the tokens until the end by increasing their stakes.

Now there are a lot of Tokens like the price and the name. There are Tokens that are already on the stock exchange that are on the way, but there are those who did not go to the stock exchange. The project projects, and that would leave Tokines on the stock exchange, at least 70 airways must be plugged in for it. Who do you think will embody.

I would prefer the token to be listed in the exchanger first, after that the distribution process is carried out. because if the distribution is done first, it feels very bored waiting for the launch token in the market, because it can't see the exchange value.

Listing before token distribution to bounty hunters. Team need to avoid a massive dump from those hunters who pick to dump the coin than holding it. So first the ICO investor will receive their coin and trade above ICO. After a month, the volume is in stable so distribution will soon to follow

I don't think it will be like that because the Campaign Bounty only gets 1% -3% of the total token sales.

We open our eyes carefully, how can 3% of all tokens put together by all hunters decrease the price of the Token listing on the Exchange?
While the decrease in tokens is about 20% on average

Personally, I think it is better to get token listed on an exchange list before the distribution of token to participants because with that, It will help participants know how promising and potential it will be.

for me, it's the same. I don't care about the price of tokens. the most important thing is that I get income from the bounty. I immediately sold it if I got the bounty token. and I'd hold bitcoin rather than hold tokens.

better, distribution token before listing in exchange. because we can sell it at the highest price. rather than a token listing in exchange and then distribution token. we will get a little income.

It makes more sense to distribute your tokens first before you list on exchanges, listing of exchange before distribution make no sense since no one has the tokens to sell

Token listing is great because from this you can be able to create a future plans that you want to be happen for the benefit of your future. From this you scan create a guideline towards to your success.

It all depends on the particular project. Successful projects have already reached 2-3 crypto-exchange exchanges and are still holding the company's bounty to increase their community

Hm I think its depending on the current market situation, if a token has been listed on exchange in this time, when its on bearish market, its easy to be dump for sure.

both of them are no problem for me. if a listing in exchanger and then distribution token, we only need to sell the token directly. because if the bounty hunter gets their token. they will sell it. but if the token price hasn't reached ico's price, we better wait for it.

It doesn't matter. If investor wants to sell tokens, he will do this! On the other hand, project with exchange listing have more community trust!

in my opinion it's better to listed on the exchanger first. because the distribution of tokens before listing on the exchanger is one of the causes of the token being dump.

Listing before delivery will cause the dumping of this token ... People will only start selling token if they are listed. But not at the moment they will wait and you can choose a suitable time to list it any swap. So, distribution 1 and the following list is the right decision

Finish all the distribution and then open the exchange.
this will be fair for all as all the investors will have their tokens before listing.
Its is the best also if you will have a listing in an exchange even the ICO is not ending. but never open it until distribution is done.

A list of tokens in an exchanger and then listing on the exchange is a good start. because if the token has been entered in exchange before it is distributed, there will be a price drop caused by bounty hunters who sell their tokens.

I think the token is better registered on the exchanger before the distribution token because if the distribution token before the exchanger listing i am not sure certain that the token will be registered on the exchanger. I say it because i have experienced that and until now the tokens I have received have not been registered on the exchangers to date.

Very nice question and also interesting!!!
In my opinion it's right to distribute token first and then only list it in the exchanges. Because if vice versa than the token price would have deep falling.

I know the EOS token. It has the largest capitalization at the time of writing, amounting to almost $ 6 billion, which is the largest capitalization of tokens based on Ether.

Token listing is a great thing because it list all great tokens wherein recommended by the public and many people says that investment is very reliable and god company for investment.

It depends on the situation of what is better between these two, if you have already the token but no exchanger then it is useless. If the token is already listed but you don't received your tokens then it so annoying once you received your tokens with a lower price already in exchanger. So in terms of that, it will depends on the mood of the trader whether what he wants to comes first.

Exchange listing first before distribution,
But, if it is possible the token will be lock until distribution to all participants in an ICO is done.
It will be fair for all and a nice way to treat your investors.

For me distribution of tokens but the exchange listing is on going.
It is better for everyone to have their tokens first before listing.
but the team ICO should not delay any listing. a week or 2 after distribution is long enough.

With a good exchange that has a decent volume the distribution will come automatically and it will make the token to spread more and more but without a good exchange and a good plan for mass adoption, it's hard for a token to get listed on big exchanges.

I agree on that, they should distribute the tokens before placing it in the market because in this way, participants will be able to sell their coins at its highest market price.

hopefully, the better the price of the current token in order to be able to come back again at the highest price, because at this time almost all tokens have decreased

Token listing is the way to inform other people which is the best token and the new tokens in the market, therefore it was created to make the process more convenient and accessible.

It is best to secure a good exchange first before distributing the token to the bounty hunters or unlocking the token to the investors especially to the angel investors, in order to secure that there is no possible dump situation coming thru the token.

In my case of firstly distribution then listing exchanges are suitable. Because after listed token releasing is dumping market and very hard to recover it.

I prefer Firstly token listings in exchanger and than distribution token because then I can see how the coin plays in the market, whether it has good prospects or not for the future by observing the development of the price of the coin.

For listing token first is good and better for we are bounty campaign participants, but we have know how about price after giving by bounty campaign will be drop by investor. We can know how much our coin and how much money we can earn after distribution of token.

My advice is to register a token. First the token must be registered and then must go for the existing distribution. After registering, tokens will be able to get the trust of investors and that is a good opportunity and the list will also help to have a more effective and efficient distribution, bro.

I don't see any reason why a token would list on an exchange, before distributing their custom tokens / coins.
Holders are the traders who would build volume and create the hype around the project.
There are so many digital currencies and you would want to make an instant impact in the market.

Distribution has to be done once the bounty and public sale is finished, for the hunter and investors to be clear on their token and the team also can face their major road map than running up and down to get listed and start think of how to get token distribute which I think is not a good shape to go.

Distribution first before listing is best and reduce stress .

The same time, important to get it on exchanges quickly after an ICO imo though, before the hype dies down.

Well I think it would be great if the coin is listed already before distribution, at least it will be easier to liquidate if you want to. This makes the coin more accessible to buyers and sellers. On the other hand, the down side would be that there will be great amount of dumpers that could drive the price low too fast.

I prefer cryptocurrencies that are listed on an exchange before distribution. And there will be more people who is going to be capable of investing.

the important thing is listing on good exchanger, bcs it is hard enough to do
even if The sooner the better, it'd be value-added for a coin

First TDE ( token distribution event ) and then listing on the exchanges is better solution for me.
Sometimes being listed on exchanges requires time and the investors should get their tokens and not waiting for listing.
It is preferable if  there is not huge time gap between TDE and listing.

If the coin is releasing and putting coins on an exchange wait a week then invest in it because the price could receive a flash dump.

I don't see reasons why tokens would be listed without distributing the tokens at first. The other idea might be because the team of the project aim to achieve price stability of the tokens such that the price woukd have been set before trading starts. Either ways, tokens should be distributed before exchange.

Now listing of any token comes from the sum which creators of a token are ready to pay. Now everything is on sale  ;D

Bounty hunters have no effect on that because I'm sure the Bounty Hunter only gets about 1-2% of the token sales.
The logic is this, how can 2% of tokens make DUMP up to 50%?

LOL

List the token first in exchanger then distribute the token to ICO investors. This is best strategy to prevent the dump of token coming from weak hands bounty hunters. Maybe you set bounty distribution date atleast 1 month after token listed in exchange because some bounty hunters dont care about the project they only want quick money so they dump the token immediately and find another ico bounty campaign.

listing a token before invest is good plan. but need to find and have alot information about the market . it's help you a lot

Theres no more assured than listing first in exchangers before distributions because atleast we may have the value already but this is why most hunters and investors become dumpers as they are greedy about the amount they might have

While distribution before listing is more pofitable as the value still fresh when the coin/token listed

The question here is "Better" for who? for ICO investors, Team of Traders?
As an ICO Investors, I think I want to receive my token before it is listing on exchanges.

Much better distribute the token first before list it on the Exchanges,because in my observation on the projects that is first listed on the Exchanges the value of their tokens is not increasing even without dumpers and the market buy and sell is not active.

Better to whom? If we speak about investors, it is better to send tokens them first and then list to exchanges and afterwards send to bounty hunters in order to avoid dump. But sucessful ICOs send locked tokens and unlock at the moment of listing on CEX exchange to prevent DEX trading

the first is the distribution of tokens, it is very likely to be a scam if they make a list in exchange first especially if it is a famous exchange. I prefer the distribution of tokens then waiting to enter the next exchange.

are you talking about bounty distributions or ico investor distributions. probably bounties. i prefer it to be listed frst because as soon as it is listed they have more volumes so if you want to trade it, it will be much easier.

Sometimes it is better that the project immediately after the end of ico went to the exchange. There is at least some trust on my part for such projects. Investors also need to give tokens before distributing it to bounty hunters. Then investors on the exchanges will make a normal price and there will be no such sale. But it is not necessary to hold tokens for too long at best for 2-3 weeks and then distribute everything along a quiet one.

I am not certain if the OP is talking about the benefits or better put the preferences of bounty hunters or the usual investors. From my observations it is pretty rare to witness listing of the token on exchanges and only after that the unlocking/distribution of it, the both actions tends to happen in the narrow time frame.

Now listing of a token costs much. Now it is necessary to pay that your token appeared at any exchange. So this system works  8)

It seems for me that every holder should receive token once he payed for it, so tokens should be distributed immediately before tokensale finish and then it will be listed after the end of token sale.

I think distributing token before listing is the best and this is even the option that most projects used. This will give all investor equal opportunity whether to sell their token instantly or hold for a while.

For sure it is better first for a token to be distributed and then listed on exchanges, in that way we will see more trading volume and new people will be more attracted to the coin.

Listing is possible right at the ICO stage, or even before it, so listing usually comes first. However, listing does not have any value, while listing on exchanges is one of the most important parts of development of most tokens.

Exchangers define the reliability of tokens. Just take a look at huge exchanges: it is very hard to find several tokens from fake ICOs on them, while the lesser the exchange, the more of trash tokens could be noticed.

You forget that you can pay for listing, while there is no chance to pay for listing on huge exchanges, because they care about reputation much more than they care for their money. Distribution shoudl take place right after listing.

I think prepayment will be better.  Because that would prevent the dev team from selling that the investor would only be able to see. That is unfair with investor.

I prefer when token already listen somewhere when I got it, and also I prefer delay destribution tokes for bounty hunters for month or two. Unfortunatly for me distribution passes almost always earlier than listing. 

I cannot find any point at listing undistributed token on the exchange. First off people need to obtain their tokens, and only then they shoudl decide what would it be better: to trade them or to hold them. However, trading option is completely necessary.

The ideal is first TGE (token generation event) then TDE (token distribution event) and then the listing.
There shouldn`t be huge  time gap between, ideally one event followed by another. If the ICO delivers the
tokens prior to listing the tokens are usually dumped on decentralized exchanges.

I prefer exchange listing before bounty distribution to avoid dumping because most of bounty hunters sell it for a lower price if there is lack of buying the token

As for me it is better to receive firstly tokens, because I feel safer in this case, I know that tokens are on my wallet and it is good. I don't estimate it from a side of company

I think tokens that have not been listed before they are distributed are much more attractive to me because there are still surprises waiting for us at the time of listing later, tokens that have been listed but have not been distributed may be more promising because we do not need to be confused about exchange what the token will be listing , but usually tokens that listing first tend to be easier to dump

I am better with distribution tokens before listing on the exchanger is better because the tokens I will have got are in my wallet. that way I can also monitor the price from the first when the token is listed on the exchanger and will not miss the moment when the price is experiencing a pump and can immediately sell it to take advantage.

The problem is most crypto exchanges charge high sums of money. Most projects cannot pay such high fees because it means less money for development.

The project will not earn anything if its coin does not enter the stock exchange, or rather, it will earn the investments that it received, but in the future it will either have to close or use the collected funds to stay afloat, while the interest in the token itself will be less and less.

I always watched and monitor tokens listing in coinmarketcap and idex the two market exchange for me is very realable, pi have some token in my mew waiting to become valuable i git it from the bounty reward.

The ideal from my opinion is distribution first, and listing withing short time after distribution completed.
Delayed listing can damage the price of the token because unlocked tokens can be traded in the DEX with any price.

It seems to me that distribution prior to token listing is the best solution,but at the same a good idea is locking tokens to prevent negative affect of selling on DEX exchanges

I prefer distribution tokens before listing on exchangers. surely the bounty hunters like that. and usually the bounty that I followed did that.

Now it is very difficult to place tokens on the exchanges. Now demand big money for this placement. It is necessary to pay the exchanges

I prefer token listing first but I rarely see an Ico that get listed on big exchanges before the distribution.

The answer is obvious. You have to distribute the token first before you list it in any trading platform because it is useless to list the token without the token circulating the market. Listing the token too early have a negative impact on imvrstor and they will think that the team are selling their holdings too early.

Best to get the ICO tokens distributed first before it hits the exchange. There's nothing and no one to exchange if there are no people holding the token.

Registered tokens first before distribution, this will be a more alive token and can be appreciated. Maybe with a low value and the development team will continue to work for the development of coins well, maintaining will be more difficult than when entering the list.

there is no better comparison. I think this concerns how the team and dev work to build investor confidence and have a strategy to increase the token value after entering the exchange.

everything depends on the developer to work around it. I think this requires team discussion
I am not sure about this, my knowledge is limited. but the developer and team should have plans and strategies to get around every situation, especially in the case of dump tokens.