Bitcoin Forum

KYC has recently been asked to finish the bouty program. This makes it difficult to update people's information. For example, participants did not update information, or some people were afraid of giving out their information because it was confidential, or some KYC could not be updated because of some program error. .
With all the above reasons, participants do not have a bouty so they do not even have their tokens, although they have devoted a lot of their time to working for a long time.
I think the bouty manager should announce KYC as soon as it launches the bouty program instead of announcing it at the end of the program. This will allow participants to prepare KYC from the beginning.

I agree on this. KYC should be announced before the program start so as to give a heads up to participants that it will be implementing one. Also, this is in consideration of the security risks involved for the participants who will give out their KYC information which is usually confidential in nature.

I experienced this once but luckily I passed the kyc. Maybe the ico asked for bounty kyc and it has nothing to do with bounty managers so don't hate them.

the agreement and disagreement from Kyc against the Bounty is currently a matter of discussion, but I myself think positively of Kyc as possible to minimize cheating, although honestly I disagree with the existence of KCC for bounty participants because the tokens owned by bounty participants are very few and that does not mean big, i just agree if kyc is only allowed for investors.

completely agree to it. Though I strongly support KYC implementation even for bounty participants as it reduces fakes/scams/etc. However, if KYC is necessary, it must be announced in the beginning of campaign itself, by this the genuine participants know about the KYC requirement in advance and can participate accordingly.

KYC or not is developer team decision, as bounty hunter we should follow the rules. I agree about announce KYC as soon possible but some people never up date information/ read notice from social media or telegram channel, they only focus like and share. KYC is simple rules, do that and get pay.

I completely agree. I have suffered more than once from such a policy. In the beginning they say that the KYC is not necessary to pass, and then at a certain moment they change the rules - and require verification. And of course they are right, but we are not

I do not mind passing verification, but the main thing is to warn about it in advance, because I can not always follow all the news and changes. And it's profitable for projects, many bounty hunters will not get their tokens because of it, and you will not prove anything.

yes KYC is great method to avoid cheaters. because some people are using multi accounts to get more rewards. also i think making them KYC verified in the start of campaign is easier for them. i have seen that happening in lot of bounty campaigns

It's high time bounty managers started announcing KYC as soon as they introduce a project. Bounty hunters cannot be robbed of hard earned token because of KYC. If I know I don't have KYC and it has been announced that partipants must pass KYC, I wouldn't bother myself participating.

Yes it can be given from the beginning of the bounty program and some campaign are following also like Entrymoney campaign. But KYC needed for bounty because now there are too much cheater in bounty  program. I can say Tradtex bounty program 13 times using my name in different way. So if there are in KYC, payment will not miss. Otherwise cheater will carry your tokens.

Yes I agree that bouty manager should announce KYC as soon as it launches the bouty program. But this was implemented as obligatory recently so maybe they did not plan to do it

First of all bounty not bouty.

Second, unfortunately, some bounties asking for a kyc. I have respect that they told in day one and you know when you entered it. But i hate that they announced it in the last second.

Well though some projects are coming up with this idea of kyc and I believe they have their reasons but nonetheless, this should not affect how bounty hunters make their ways in maximizing their profits. Also, I believe bounty hunters should not be disturbed of kyc if kyc is to satisfy its main aim.

actually this is a KYC application for additional security. So there happen multiple account and claim rewards become more secure. However, many also dislike this KYC system.

One positive thing when announcing kyc at the beginning of the campaign, with kyc is certainly more good for both of them so that they are able to add confidence if their performance is good and appropriate to get prizes.

yeah this is very necessary that all should declare it in the beginning of bounty campaign so the people's who havenot their kyc or those who is afraid to share their personal information would maintain distance with these bounty campaign they should inform about all terms and conditions at the time of launching so the time and energy of participate don't get waste.

Most likely because of confidentiality for those people who don't cheat the system, since I knew a couple of people who did KYC for their airdrop/bounty however they got the 3 worst possible results which is: scammed coin, their bounty is not honored and lastly is that they got the bounty however the coin itself does not have any value.

So RN they're in panic as they are receiving emails from random airdrops that asked them to signup, where they dont even remember signing up for them. It's also the same reason why I'm hesitant doing a KYC especially in some newly born websites.

TLDR: I'm just scared if someone might use my ID/Passport for their own benefit.

I hate this when they didn't told at the first place. Most of the time i think that they don't want to give out bounty and with asking kyc at the end, trying to decrease the budget. Because not everybody passing the kyc.

I already wrote this kind of thread way back "March 2018" and the response was positive new Bounty Campaigns are include KYC Announcement in there Official Bounty Thread. But suddenly as always many Bounty Hunter was not paying attention to read the "Rules and the KYC Requirements" in the thread before joining  the Bounty Campaign. in the End there was heck!

Hi
KYC "Know Your Customer" is the best thing to identify your participant. But bounty program must clarify it in the starting  that KYC Is Necessary to participate and claim your rewards. 

it happens in many bounty campaigns, but for me, bounty hunters doesnt need to undergo the kyc process because they are not even an investor. there's no need to their identity, but if it requires the bounty participants, they cant do anything about that.

I participated in one campaign in which I passed the KYC before registering for participation.
I think it's right!
But if you are asked to pass the KYC at the end of the Bounty - then a person may disagree and simply not receive a reward!
In general, I'm against the KYS, I don`t want to disclose my data to other people.

Taht is the trouble that we bounty hunters face nowadays, they get free promotions if we can't provide KYC. If in the first place they said that they required KYC people who can't do kyc will not join. Those managers should know that. It happened to me before and that is very unfortunate. Your efforts results to nothing.

Here I'm not saying KYC is not needed. I would like to say that KYC should be informed from the beginning instead of the final announcement.

Look at it from the other side - it significantly reduces the potential number of participants and as a result increases your dlolu rewards. In all there are positive and negative sides)))

Lots of people writing that KYC can help to avoid scum) I want to see documents of devs before they making ann thread) I'm for KYC for ICO team) They are taking our money they have to prove themselves)

I agree with you, I think that asking KYC after the end of the bounty when all the work is done is not quite honest, besides, I'm sure that they are aware of it from the very beginning. In general, I have a positive attitude towards KYC, and if the project is good I trust them.

I don't prefer to share my personal information just for bounty. And I'm trying not to participate those campaigns which require KYC.

I think we should take a look at on how much we earns from that project. If it worth the efforts i think doing KYC might be fair enough to claim our rewards. But when we only got $5-$20 but required KYC to claim it, well thank you dev.. You can keep my rewards, im not gonna give them my personal private data for that amount of money

I agree with you. ICOs and projects should announce in the first place if KYC would be required. I'm a bit hesitant too to just give out information and details since sometimes there are projects that turn out to be a scam in the end. Also, I just think that it kind of misses the point with the nature of anonymity in blockchain technology.

Unnecessary problems this procedure. Passed only a couple of times - but for some reason once did not pass-and it turns out that the work was done in vain. So I have a very negative attitude towards it

Nowadays there are more and more bounties who require an KYC, before receiving bounty tokens. In my opinion is it better without KYC, but my expectation is that in the next months more bounties will require KYC.

KYC must be notified at the start of the bounty, not when the registration of tokens begins.
I think it's better, because all participants cant do KYC.

Almost all bounty managers write in the announcement the following: during the entire period of the bounty the manager has the right to change the rules of the conduct at his own discretion.
When you fill out the form, then you agree with the rules, which is why I have a question: why are you dissatisfied with what you yourself agreed to?

actually, KYC is also important because with a KYC system it will reduce a cheating. but there are many bounty hunters or investors who object to this system. But I think if we have all the info needed it won't be burdensome. we only need to collect our personal data. I think that's a natural thing.

If it were for me the presence of KYC is certainly not a problem. for those of us who did play honest, of course the KYC is common. Because the system is indeed for it security. We only stayed just follow, how that was ordered when the KYC form filling.

I joined a lot of bounty campaign and more of them don't required kyc for all the bounty hunters. But some required to do the kyc for the reason that they have to know if you are not coming from the banned country and there is nothing wrong to do the kyc if they accepted the documents that not limited only for passport to verify the kyc. Because there are many hunters that have no passport and the only thing they have is ID.

KYC to do it is a good thing,from KYC it also realize that the information that the person gave about himself is right or wrong . the company will also be able to work properly on those people who are working in it.they can get the  facilities they need to give them in the right way. i agree to KYC.

Oh man.   At first I thought this said KYC for Booty.  LOL.  I may actually send in my paperwork for that. 

But on the big switcheroo at the end I feel as though the bounty manager should be given a negative trust for that one.  That's pure deception.  No one with a brain would send in KYC documents over the internet to a non government official so simply rip us off. 

I think That projects should announce all information from begin program.

It is unfair that the passage of KYC is announced at the end of the bounty program. For me, this is crucial in the decision to join the bounty program. If there is KYC - I do not participate. Because I do not trust to give my personal information to unknown persons on the Internet. I don't think it's safe. After all, hackers and scammers at every step.

In my opinion, the manager's bounty doesn't know if there is a Kyc requirement without getting a word from the developer. Sometimes the developer is late to announce information about Kyc, and this makes us confused and afraid to provide information about the Kyc requirements. I think Kyc is very good at avoiding fraud, and this is very helpful to reduce the actions of bounty participants who cheat.

I do not want to give my personal details to strangers. If at the end of the bounty campaign  they ask me to pass KYC, I'd rather sacrifice coins.

I agree with you completely, but you see they have a simple rule they may at their discretion change the rule any company you did the work and they can be as cunning as possible, the easiest example of this, they divide the tokens between all participants, and then all the checks on KYC and people who are not KYC get tokens, but tokens of their share to the remaining participants, this is a tricky economy without which this world would not exist.

to me it's normal! KYC It will not take long, you can spend some time to do it. Avoid cheating in bounty would be better.

Real and reliable projects ask for KYC,I really appreciate this initiative because it helps to discourage the scammers having fake accounts in social media and Bitcointalk can be detected by KYC procedure.The real participants will be encouraged by KYC his or her performance will show how promoted the project.Other hand companies also know that is there real buyer or investor and positive use of investment.

It happened on many campaign that KYC requirement is not be announce at the beginning of campaign. So, people who joining many campaign don't know information regarding KYC for bounty hunter amd they lost the tokens.

KYC- it's no longer a problem to create as many identical topics on this forum. Who doesn't want to submit their data - buy the necessary data on the black market , is really inexpensive. Unless , of course , you win $ 50 with a bounty. Then just photoshop it (your id) ;)

I do not like bounty campaigns that require KYC, but sadly many projects now require KYC to force the end of the project. This is uncomfortable for me and probably for all bounty hunters. I also agree with you the bounty manager should request KYC from the beginning when posting.

many users here are also asking why kyc is being announced at the end of the bounty program, and many people are against it. its true that if they require kyc they must announce it at the very first place.
but for me, bounty hunters dont really have to do kyc since bounty hunters must remain anonymous.

This is all, of course, correct. To declare that the KYC will be checked only at the end of the ICO, it is a fraud, a fraud, to a certain part of the participants who for various reasons do not want to pass it, do not pay the tokens they earned.
 However, it is also necessary to take into account that the requirement to pass a KYC test in respect of participants in the ICO generosity campaign is generally illegal. No document explicitly requires that such an audit be conducted for members of the ICO generosity campaign. We are not investors and therefore such an inspection against us should not be conducted.

It's fair to announce KYC before the start of the bounty, but unfortunately complaints never give you your time back, you should easily avoid the manager and do bounty somewhere else.

KYC is needed to avoid the scammer, regulator makes KYC and ICO project must do it
i think there isnt problem if you re fair to do bounty, just simple step to fix KYC

or maybe the people on the bounty campaign just didnt ask if there would be a KYC program for the bounty you should ask first before joining in, asking doesnt hurt, bounty manager doesnt have any control for KYC the project decide if they will conduct it.

Kyc is good for bounty it's just that it's good for the team management because they will be able to fish out scammers. But on the other hand disclosing one's Identity so as to receive token isn't good enough.

The idea of KYC for Bounty hunters is a bit weird.
If there is a Bounty that requires KYC, it should be obviously announced initially in Bounty conditions.
Otherwise it looks unfair and can be considered as a red flag for the Bounty.

In my own opinion, I don't see any need for the so call KYC in the world of Cryptocurrency be it bounty, airdrop or ICO. Many people wouldn't be comfortable to submit their confidential to someone they do not know nor whom they have not seen for once It would have been better If this KYC of a thing could just be trashed out in Crypto.

KYC is not a bad thing, because nothing is wrong if a company know her client. the only bad thing there is that when the rules are not made clear from the beginning of the bounty program and at the middle it now come up with KYC. it is disgusting.

How much longer can you talk about KYC? I think that all this has already been tested many times, the KYC process is clearly made just to improve the situation with the procedure of KYC for investors. This is normal. But as for KYC for bounty this is not normal.

I agree with you that KYC is good, but only if I send my data to honest people. And in the crypto industry there are a lot of scammers who want to steal your personal data.

This is the problems that many bounty campaign had because when they started legislation was not so strict so kyc was not allowed. Now many bounty campaigns requires kyc since beginning

This contest doesn't require any KYC. Just enter your email and join telegram group and you're in.

More info: https://coincodex.com/article/2154/200000-adb-token-giveaway/

KYC is one method used to reduce many accounts, so I support it. provided the Bounty is really real and what is requested from KYC is normal then I don't think it's a problem. we only need to be careful when filling in KYC.

Kyc shouldn't be compulsory for bounty hunters, probably team are using it as opportunity to reduce the number of people that will be rewarded the worst part is that the decision will be communicated at the end of campaign.

I think bounty managers shoukd take it upon themselves to enquire from the team if kyc will be mandatory to receive bounty rewards which would have been included in the preliminary post of the bounty. So that any bounty participants would have known from the outset and not when they have worked at when the reward is to be distributed , they will be unable to do it and it will just be a waste of time and effort.

Bounty managers should know when kyc is required as they themselves will have to go through the process to get their payment. Good ones will inform us on the original post whether or not kyc is required for their bounty program, if not then stay away from those manager who only tell you at the end.

I think the notice of KYC should be made known to all the bounty participants before the bounty kicks off to enable those who are not comfortable releasing their documents avoid such bounty. It won't be fair on the parts of the bounty hunters if they are not aware and at the end, it will be announced.

I have notice that bounties that requires KYC sometimes become very successful and I have noticed it for so many days since I came to this crypto business.

I agree with the author, I also do not like this situation when the bounty project at the end of the signature of the company changes the conditions with the help of KYC, which recently happens often. Perhaps, unscrupulous bounty companies want to save on payments of rewards in this way, because not all crypto-enthusiasts are ready to share their own information for their security.

Some bounty managers are not attentive in their job, they don't share KYC information before the bounty, rather they share when the bounty ends. Many people can't update all the time, that's why many people lose their earned coins, because of the KYC procedure. Yes, it is good to prevent scammer, but the bounty manager should share KYC information before the bounty starts officially.

I absolutely agree with you thoughts. With the amount of cheaters in the bounty campaign, that is why they are doing this KYC thing. It is for those cheaters that have multiple entries and those honest bounty hunters are affected. It is now becoming a trend that most of the bounty campaign are asking for KYC at the end of the campaign to caught these cheaters off guard.

I believe that for bounty programs KYC identification is necessary. This will help to save the campaign from dishonest players using many accounts. Better, of course, it is carried out at the beginning of the campaign bounty. Otherwise, if it is done at the end, then the already distributed coins do not return to the pool if someone does not pass the KYC verification

Yes some ICO exists which require a token to take KYC. And I think this is not good because I never experienced fraud ICO. Then I followed the ICO project and to get the token must perform charging KYC. And KYC is already done and so far haven't gotten in return.

I know some bounty requires KYC for their project but some participants are hesitate to submit their personal information especially online for it is easy for the hackers to acquire your information. Nowadays, many incidents of report that some of hackers uses your information to scam others. I know KYC is important but the safety is more important.

they do it to make sure people not creating multi account to participate in bounty program, but sometime this process is very slow, bounty participant need more time till get accepted, i was participate on a project, and it take me 2months to get verified

Kyc is conducted to know real people participating in the bounty i like kyc it used to fix out scam peoples in a project,

It's time to cancel KYC for generosity. In the end, we hunters get a penny of tokens, and the passage of KYC is not the right procedure for sending our data to those who can, do something with them

I just find it ironic where before KYC is not required in crypto, specifically in bitcoin as it's main purpose is to do transaction anonymously but rn from exchangers, bounty or airdrops and even the wallet itself , hi coinbase/coins.ph, requires to do a KYC. I guess it might be just me, but KYC defeats the purpose of cryptos.

I don't know what is their purpose for asking bounty hunters to do KYC, because bounty hunters are considered as partners, not customers, so they don't have any legal related to do KYC. I was upset when there were some bounty campaigns asked bounty hunters to do KYC after the campaign had finished but they didn't announce that bounty hunters must do KYC before or when starting their campaigns.

I agree to KYC when joining the bounty. This will be fair to everyone and avoid cheating.
Bounty campaigns should perform kyc

Yes its true they announce the kyc at the small time period it happens in a couple of days and theres a deadline schedule,so it happens when some of the participants cannot update their telegrams due to any kind of reasons,they  cannot get their tokens that they've worked for and it happens to me also i was so dissappointed.

Yes it should be announce at the very beginning so that you have a choice to make if you're going to fill all the information or will stay anonymous. So it won't be waste of time that you won't get tokens because you don't want to pass KYC   

Well, honestly i be more preparable submitting each either of the two process as long as the bounty campaign that i was working is really good project which has potentially promising. This is because we are here in this new technology to earned profit not by cheating to earned.

It riled up my anger when a bounty campaign does announce kYC program after the end of the period. So for me had nothing to give any I'd, or government issued papers. How do I get my reward just because of this shit kyc.  I waste my effort and time on this kind of project.

In my personal opinion, I think that the bounty participant doesn't need to perform KYC since they don't get the coin/token from purchasing it.
They had their right to get the coin/token due to they already helping to promote the project through the campaign.

Kyc is a necessity that must be present in every program as we did not want, and there are several reasons for this from the team. And for the participants this point is not unambiguous, but I do not see anything critical that would pass the kyc. This is also insurance for the team, because not all the inhabitants of the planet can participate in bounty campaigns.

I don't have any trouble with KYC of bounty campaign :). I think it's really easy to pass KYC of bounty campaign :). There are some bounty campaigns don't accept participant from some countries so you just need to prove that you don't come from those countries then everything will be fine :).

My advice do not do any bounty work before you pass the KYC, even though you will be late to join the program, but it will better rather than you do all the work but you got nothing for it.

I agree with your statement about the need for the bounty manager to announce KYC since the beginning of the bounty program. This is necessary because it is a consideration of the decision to participate in the bounty program or not. So that participants will feel safe and comfortable in their hard work.

I think KYC contradicts to the anonymous aspect of crypto. Of course it is very useful info for the business but on the other hand is safety of the participant. I agree with you that managers should mention this condition before beginning of bounty campaign.

Hi there!

Definetly they should announce this before the bounty program is live! People are assuming they dont need it in the beginning, and maybe they dont want perform KYC for there rewards its ridiculous! And all of a sudden you need to perform the KYC that you didnt want to in order to get your payment. You worked for it under other rules so maybe you can do something legally? I really dont know but it isnt fair to be honest.
Greetings! 8)

Unfortunately, this often happens, and you have to pass KYC in order to collect your reward!

KYC is the procedure I really hate to do but if the project are really trustworthy so it means that you can do that without being aware of somebody stealing your documents and use it for their filthy deeds.

I have mixed feelings about KYC. On one hand it takes away the "pseudonymity / anonymity" of crypto, and I don't like the idea of sharing confidential info with strangers, but on the other hand it helps reduce the possibility of bounty hunters trying to take advantage of campaigns using multiple accounts, in a way it makes the campaign seem more legit. However, I do agree that KYC should be announced at the beginning of the campaign, or at the latest within the first couple weeks). When they add that requirement towards the end, or just before counting stakes I feel like it is a way to cheat on participants and not pay everyone.

I concur on this. KYC ought to be reported before the program begin in order to surrender a heads to members that it will actualize one. Additionally, this is in light of the security dangers required for the members who will give out their KYC data which is typically classified in nature.

Я вoт пoкa нe yчacтвyю в бayнти, гдe КУC. Чтo=тo мнe КУC нe нpaвитcя, пoэтoмy и нe yчacтвyю.

Unfortunately this happens very often . Here the choice is yours: you can no longer follow this Manager . Or, to not have spent time in the empty, and you can go through this procedure . It is not so complicated - and if the project is worth it, you can spend a little more time

There are lots of people which having a trouble every time they passed their KYC on the bounty management because most of them does not have the enough documents, information, and valid IDs to verify their identity. I think it is not necessary to do KYC at bounty campaigns because bounty hunters are not investors and they can help the ICO improve their community.

Yes, kyc for investors I think is very feasible and must be done, if for the participants of the bounty I think that it feels necessary to be eliminated, as you said, the number of tokens owned by the bounty participants is not how much better Kyc is removed from the bounty participants.

Yes i thought everyone who have finish KYC can do the bounty.

it will minimize the probability that someone have multiple account to do the bounty. and it would be more fair.

But I hope the KYC for bounty Hunter not take soo difficult than Investor KYC.

must make a difference between KYC for BH and for Investor.

Sometimes real projects need no KYC. But i think they can choose another way to know their customers. KYC is the way to control their business. Maybe in the future the info of all people will upload online and we will do KYC easily.

KYC is much avoided by many people. but for the moment many once a notice stating the need of KYC and not at the beginning of the bounty. This will also facilitate the bounty hunter chose the bounty they want to with KYC or not.

I really hate kyc because i do not have any to pass. What if one project declared kyc program at the end of the campaign. So i do not have any chance to.claim my reward just because of this. I ONLY HaVE STUDENT ID, not government issued so it will be rejected if i do. Let say I participate 4 months in their bounty campaign, then feel the same as being scam

I think that KYC  is an opportunity to control the crypto-currency market at least somehow, it would be better if the laws were written for  cryptocurrencies , but for this time being this is not serious.

Projects intended not to inform hunters about kyc at first place, then they will tell this after the bounty so they can less the payment in the pool, i mean some of hunters are not participating on the bounties that has kyc because of some reason, therefore projects grab this chance to do hunters job as free until the end of ICO.

Very accurately, the program manager should have a four-day notice when the program starts so that the player chooses and prepares KYC for a long time to finally know KYC or after a long time. At the end of the new reward notification

Kyc is only for customer/client, (know your costumer) so how it be implement to bounty? Many bounty hunters are Dissapointing to this kyc, because when you participate in the bounty and you confident that it has no kyc, but at the end its has, more of us bounty hunters dont want to join on any bounties that has kyc because of our personal reaons, but threads didnt announce that they have,

I also agree that KYC requirements should be announced up-front at the start of any bounty program, however personally I do not have a problem in giving the information to complete a KYC. There is no such thing as confidential documents. You show them to people almost every day when you apply for local services, when you travel beyond your countries borders, even when you go for a drink in a bar. Most KYC are to stop people cheating and making multiple applications, others are to satisfy government regs.

Asking a bounty hunter to provide KYC is a rogue act. The bounty hunter is not an ICO investor, and the way to get the token is not through purchase. It is more like a promotion of employees, asking the employee for KYC is ridiculous.

Gradually, the idea o KYC is integrated in almost all recent bounties. I have my personal disagreement to this initiative because of how risky it can be for the participants since no one knows when when such sensitive information will get into the hands of a wicked person.

I think KYC should be done before the program starts. Because it is at least unfair-many participants of the bounty simply can not pass the KYC and do not receive their tokens, it turns out they worked in vain.

your opinion is right, but as a bounty hunter, we can't do anything if bounty manager annoucements KYC required at the end of campaign, you don't receive any reward if decided not to do KYC, each bounty campaign not guarantee give your reward or it's just waste your time doing free work for them, so check your reward value in final spreadsheet to decided your action, past the KYC progress or forget the bounty

Even if I don't agree with you about KYC for bounties, because I think it's a good thing.
You have a point... we need to know who is going to hold our datas.... and be sure no one is going to sell them.

KYC is now the best way to confirm that you did not cheat.
in ICOs and bounties, always have someone tried to cheat, using multi accounts.
I know they still try to cheat, but it helps. partly

I think it is necessary that the bounty hunters receive a small reward for their effort in a few months. Of course the BM should be clear about KYC from the beginning

if you know the Bounty Dehedge Token is exactly what you are talking about here.
at the beginning of the campaign it was normal and there was no word "KYC needed" but after the bounty campaign finished boutny the manager asked KYC.

and that was Ianbgsung's request from the Dehedge Development Team, a pity!

Thanks I learn something from your post. 3-4 weeks left until the end of bounty campaigns. I'll be careful about that.
and check our 6 bounty programs which you can take part in simultaneosly!

The bounty manager has a different way to organize bounty hunters / participation, in my opinion he has the right to announce KYC at the beginning or at the end of the bounty, I have no problem with that, which I fear is only the bounty manager does not pay the participants in full.

KYC is a requirement that is widely avoided by the bounty hunter. whether for reasons of what certainly when there is a KYC then they seek safe so that the identity they have not fallen into the wrong people. but many have been announced at the beginning of the bounty if need KYC and not. This will be quite important given the course is nothing like the KYC and approve or not.

I do not understand the reason why a bounty hunter who is not an investor is being asked to do a KYC before his bounty reward can be sent. This  does not make any sense  to me and I believe it is another scheme to deny the bounty hunters their hard earned reward. Some times nobody will be informed at the inception of the bounty of the KYC only for them to comeup with the issue of KYC at the end of the bounty not even at the thread but at their telegram page. If by chance you did not see the notification on telegram and it is closed you have lost your reward.

I agree, because I don't want to disclose my data and I don't trust to ICO , my data can be leaked. That's why I pay attention to requirement prior to participate and this rules changing is awful.
Bounty participants aren't customers, that's why they aren't obligated to pass KYC

I understand your point but if  you are a bounty hunter and participate in signature campaign you  have no choice but to pass an kyc to get your bounty rewards. Perhaps there's a purpose why the bounty required KYC for participants like avoid using multiple accounts.

Main purpose is to comply with the regulation, if not the project imposed to a serious risk of being closed down by the authority. preventing people from cheating is an additional bonus and as far as I know most of the project requiring it too for the people who invested I think that's fair enough for both of the side but sometimes it's just too risky to give away our really important data to someone we don't know didnt it? that's why if I can I will avoid such thing.

we know that many people still have a problem about kyc to join a bounty. we know that in kyc we have to collect our personal data. there is also a kyc that uses a passport and it is troublesome for people who don't have it. but kyc is a rule in a bounty and we must obey it.

When they announce if it required or not at first, it is totally understandable but when they say it at the end, it is not ethical.

Kyc is used to verified the number of participants in bounty, it fixed out scammer... it bring the truth out

actually I also want the same thing about KYC requests for each bounty program. if KYC is requested 1 week after the program was launched.
after I learned some time back by reading every information about the bounty, KYC requests were subject to regulations.

To me, I only accept KYC when the amount of money I earn from the bounty is over $ 1000, which is a pretty big amount for me, so I accepted to give my information to someone. However, for those who earn less, that is a mistake, many bounty hunters will not participate with KYC conditions.

I have seen that now KYC has been one of the major tools in ICO's. What I have realized is that those ICO's that involves KYC has been successful. So for now I think KYC is good and involving it in their bounties is not something new.

As a bounty hunter, we have to follow the rules. KYC or not is a decision of the development team but it needs to be announced before the program starts to let community members know it will be applied.

Actually, asking for kyc in the final program is a good way. It will make cheaters waste their effort. Those who diluted the stakes will have to give up the common parts they have cheated.

The KYC may be good in many aspect, but to me, it has been a complication. It has deprived me of some of my tokens. I never knew KYC screening will appear when I register for the campaign and I didn't have a few criteria which they were asking for, it was really painful. So for noe any campaign that is bound by KYC, I avoid.

There are cases when the ICO team simply don't know from the beginning that they will need to require KYC for bounty hunters. If the legal team decides they can't distribute any tokens without KYC verification, then I understand why it happens that way

There's a lot of bounty campaign at the beginning saying that after the ICO are required KYC and some of them after the campaign the announce that need to pass KYC. There are simple way if you don't want an bounty that required KYC you should leave and find another campaign that no kyc needed.

I hate every campaign where is KYC required. They will not share the rest of tokens for honest participant, they will keep them.
I do not understand why I have to provide KYC them, I didnt buy anything...

I agree with the implementation of KYC in bounty campaign because it help to decline the scam or fakes, so we should follow the step as per given in guidelines in KYC and complete and do not panic for it instead support it.

I agree with you. Bounty campaigns if required by KYC should be announced early to participants prepare or refuse to participate.

Looking at how KYC's are, they were brought for devs to know their customers and considering bounty hunters, I think we are all part of the customers so involving KYC into bounty does not matter most. To me I think it's the best for all Icons.

I think not need complete KYC  for bounty and recieve few tokens and for this give you personal info to people that you dont know what can do with yours data i some afraid,for investors with big money maybe is right but for bounty i think not good idea.

When the company notifies the need to transfer KYC from the very beginning of the project, I can participate in it or not, there is nothing wrong with this. But I do not like when they introduce KYC after the bounty campaign.

I think kyc is unnecessary. I think the participants do not like this situation. I do not prefer that bounty if there are kyc in bounty terms.

I agree to the full 100%. Managers should warn in advance about the need to pass KYC. Because it's not always possible to keep track of all the news and updates, and as a result, you may not get your earnings for bounty

I have suffered more than once because of the need to pass the KYC at the end of the company, and even gave a limited time for verification - accordingly, who did not have time to pass that did not receive anything. And I was among those who did not pass. And all because of the fact that they did not warn immediately about this.

Yes. Announcing about KYC at the middle of or at the later stage of a bounty campaign is not fair. Because at that time the hunters may have dedicated their time and efforts to promote that ICO. So the mangers must inform the hunters about the KYC status at the start of the campaign.

I think KYC should be ask at the end of the bounty campaign. You don't want to provide your information without getting anything. It is not worth it providing your personal information if the bounty campaign fails. Better to submit it once you already know that the bounty is successful. At least you already know you have earned something in exchange on providing your personal details. KYC really helps us eliminating multiple account users, it has a good advantage.

Yes you are right, kyc should be announced at the beginning of the company. Since there are people who basically do not want to pass kyc, and when they finally find out about kyc they get it, they've wasted their time.

I agree with you, the manager or team should inform in early if need a KYC in the bounty program, because that can be a consideration also for participants to participate or not. but usually the KYC is announced at the end of the bounty because of the large number of spammers, many cloning accounts are trying to get a lot of payment, so they have to fill KYC to reduce it all. but I would like have KYC announced at the start before the bounty runs.

It is very inconvenient to fill the KYC form when you are not buyer but just a bounty participant. But we should become accustomed to it because Bounty could be a good instrument for money laundering, so there should be a KYC procedure.

Why would bounty participants don't update their information about the bounty? It would be a negligence of their part if they miss the kyc as announced by the project owner. It is not hard to do a kyc on a project. Also, it is good to have kyc to trace those participants who have multiple accounts in the campaign.

Support the author. Not all participants want to give their personal data is unknown where. ICO is much easier and cheaper than IPO, but there are more risks for bounty hunters. I understand that in some countries KYC may be part of the law, but it is necessary to respect bounty hunters, and inform them about the need for KYC in advance.

Good point, there are bounty that I have seen suddenly changing their rules at the last minute and requiring bounty hunters to submit KYC, that sucks, because majority of us doesn't want to submit our personal data, so you ended up in a dilemma wherein you either wanted to submit and get the token payment for all your hardwork, so simply not pass because you are afraid that your personal data might be leaked somewhere.

KYC sometimes needs to be used, and this is indeed to avoid cheating. I think this doesn't need to be worried because there are indeed more crypto users, even though the owner is anonymous but I don't think there is anything wrong either.

I am really fed up on other ICOs that ask for KYC when the bounty campaign almost ends and it's not actually written or announced that a KYC is needed before the start of the campaign. In my opinion too, KYC is risking yourself in identity theft and might even the key for others to have their account get hacked because you are giving your vital information to them.

There are a lot of bounty campaign that are open for everyone. KYC is the best thing that has been invented in bounty campaign because there are a lot of dummy account who take advantage those who doesn't have a knowledge in doing such a stupid thing like making some dummy account to produce a lot of money. KYC is the best because the campaign is really secured and cannot be easily hacked.

I hate when at the beginning of the bounty programm managers do not talk about the passage of the kyc, and then at the end it turns out that the kyc must pass

Actually i'm always experience participating bounties and till the end of the bounty are they gonna using a KYC.
So it will can going too long to distribute the bounty rewards because of the KYC required.

I only accept KYC when the amount of money I earn from the bounty is over $ 1000, which is a pretty big amount for me, so I accepted to give my information to someone. However, for those who earn less, that is a mistake, many bounty hunters will not participate with KYC conditions.

it should be better if the info about Kyc is explained at the beginning of the bounty,
I have experienced a bad thing because of kyc, because of the lack of communication between the dev bounty project and the participants, I and the other participants did not get tokens because of the late info bout kyc.

it's very sad when you give your time to participate, but the result is nothing.

If KYC procedure was not specified right from the beginning of the bounty campaign , but was set as mandatory just in to weeks before the end of campaign , I think it can be considered as a scam . Unfortunately such cases are not rare nowadays , but I hope all those scammers would be tagged with red trust to prevent scam in the future.

I did not understand a single thing of this post.
I don't think that KYC is a reason to hold distribution of tokens. They cannot check every single document they have. Usually the delay is due to another reasons.

Honestly, i agree about KYC if they as good developer not abuse the document for own consideration. Actually, KYC procedure is only applicable for the investor that want to buy the token. Yesterday i passed the KYC and i get my token from bounty reward, and i'm really happy.

It has deprived me of some of my tokens. I never knew KYC screening will appear when I register for the campaign and I didn't have a few criteria which they were asking for, it was really painful. So for noe any campaign that is bound by KYC, I avoid.

Many ICOs seem to be of the opinion that it is sketchy to hand out tokens without performing KYC checks. Personally, I'm not sure where this comes from as I've never seen legislation requiring you to perform identity checks to give away money. For example, you wouldn't ask for KYC for a competition, giveaway or when giving away free samples would you? However, a lot of projects are taking it to the extreme by doing these checks due to regulatory uncertainly and AML compliance.

I guess one good thing is it reduces the number of bots/multi-accs paid out by bounties

Indeed its very frustrating doing all those bounty tasks and ending up you can not receive the bounty stakes because you can not pass the KYC. Bounty manager should announce the KYC early on the campaign so it will be transparent to the participants.

Author is right on some point Bounty managers must announced that KYC is Compulsory, but KYC is a medium to prevent fake accounts and identify the authenticity of their participant.

actually not as you said, there are many goals in KYC verify.
and for the participants, this can also be a factor so that farmers cannot multi-account in one project.

I don't see any problems with passing the KYC process. When you receive coin you potentially becomes an investor, that's why kyc can be applicable. If you are honest person kyc shouldn't be any problem to you.

The KYC audit is generally illegal for members of the ICO generosity campaign, since it should only apply to investors. Moreover, demanding to pass such a check at the end of the ICO campaign, it already looks like a fraud, because the meaning of it is only in not paying the earned token to the participants of the ICO generosity campaigns. In this case, you need to require the ICO team to provide information on what basis they require bounty hunters to provide confidential information. I'm sure it's just arbitrariness on their part.

I think that KYC  is an opportunity to control the crypto-currency market at least somehow, it would be better if the laws were written for  cryptocurrencies , but for this time being this is not serious.

Yes, you are right... Announcing KYC requirements from the start of campaign will reduce participants joining bounties because not everyone have the identity they usually request for, personal information is strictly ment for personal use, so people don't want to start giving it out.

I think you're right. Many participants in the bounty of companies can't get the reward just because they have a problem with KYC and div just burn the tokens not being distributed among the other participants.

On the one hand, this is rightly done, that it is necessary to drive KYC to verify the identity, but on the other hand not. You can be late with the input of the identity confirmation and everything that worked then for nothing.

well, actually for KYC regulation it's very useful and good, even for a bounty hunter. but, you're right. sometimes they inform you to fill KYC at the end of the ICO, and sometimes so many participants are not ready for it. I think that is also the reason why the payment of a project is long. maybe the best solution is to notify the rules regarding filling KYC before the bounty participants register.

I don't have any problems of doing KYC procedure but I understand that for some people this can be a problem so I hope that every bounty manager will write at the beginning of the campaign if KYC is required or not.

More than one years I have active on bounty campaign project and found only one campaign have I participated needed KYC. I was upload my document and approved than they sent me coin from bounty campaign reward. Next time I am checking which one bounty campaign needed KYC and I leave it.

In some cases, the requirement for KYC identification procedure arises later, this may happen as a result of new legal requirements or a change in the opinion of the project's lawyer.

It would be nice if every program has a KYC. In that case we wouldn't see as much participants as we can see nowadays. It's really nice to know that no one can use multiple accounts and KYC is helping us to do that.

I do not like when asking KYC to get earned tokens for Bounty. when you work long and then you find out that you need to go through it, then you have to. but if I know about it at once, I usually do not take it bounty

I agree that for the participants of the bounty campaign it is necessary to announce in advance the need to pass KYC. Some campaigns neglect this. It's very ugly, but unfortunately, the rules are set by them and we can not help it.

Nowadays it is stated at the beginning of every program that there will be kyc
But for me as a very inquisitive person, I go to the bounty telegram chat first and then I inquire if there is kyc (know your customer) before I embark on the project

Because sometimes I’m opportune to join bounties with kyc
And sometimes my schedules does not permit me such time

Most importantly doing research about bounty programs are good, it informs us what to do regarding kyc
If the program is worth it, yes kyc is good
If the bounty is not worth sorry no kyc

One of the projects I participated in announced KYC before the beginning of the second phase of bounty.
Well I personally did not experience any problems with passing KYC and was approved in a couple of hours. So I wonder what is the problem everybody has about giving their ID and a selfie?

You're definitely right because the KYC issues arise last year during the time of crypto currency high traffic which literally leads to a lot of crypto currencies traders/investors been scam through fake ICOs and ROI investment. So, KYC was implemented by the US SEC and senior regulators which I believed they are trying to track crypto currency user cause the ICOs/crypto investment company are those that ought to be register or have license in other to protect the crypto traders/investors. However, most bounties from EU don't ask for KYC.

I fully agree that we need to talk about KYC at the very beginning of the company. I often went through it , and a couple of times just did not know that it needs to go and just happened to have done his job in vain . This is very upsetting

KYC is for investors, not something that has to be enforced on people that do some promo work for you. That's something people need to understand.

These two are really different things. KYC is also known as Know Your Customers which is meant for investors to fulfill before getting their tokens. In essence, bounty hunters are no investors and should not participate in KYC.

it is very unpleasant when you need to go through this procedure, which you did not know at the beginning of the company. It is at least weeds out the scams and double accounts, but he brings a lot of headaches fair participants

I am generally against this procedure and believe that it contradicts the concept of crypto currency as such. I have already gone through several KYS procedures for companies and not all of them say ahead of time. It is unpleasant.

Not so long ago, this procedure was included in the cryptocurrency, and so much caught in it. I increasingly run into her at her work and I found that very annoying. I do not mind to provide your data, it's just a very long and tedious . Maybe something goes wrong and you get nothing for your work .

It is hard to join bounty that require KYC because not all have valid ID to verify the accounts. I do not have that the reason why I do not choose that kind of project. KYC is good only to those who want to invest on the project for the security. As a supporter and wanting to earn tokens for our service, we do not need KYC because we can be trusted without it.

I absolutely agree with you, if in bounty company provides for passage of KYC, bounty Manager should announce this at very beginning of company. B / M must coordinate this issue with leadership ICO company, on behalf of which he makes  bounty.

It is very annoyed to have put so much on a project and at the end you asking for KYC , that alone show how that project is not trustworthy and having KYC for bounty is also just out of if , because I don't know why I should give my details to you all in the name of buying your token with my money or using my time to help promote your token when it has not even be stamped that is a good project or will be one and more this is a decentralized technology which yet has no regulation or what so ever and I don't think KYC is even need to be think about , if the token get listed on exchange does that mean the only people to have KYC will eventually trade it capital NO , so I don't even support kyc when it comes to ico or bounty but only an exchange which I a centralized are ok to give to.

maybe you are wrong, in this forum there are now rules of merit, this regulation is enough to prevent people from using many accounts in the bounty, KYC on the counter bounty is very unfair, KYC is actually used for investors to prevent money laundering transactions

Why it so hard to you to send KYC?, all the problem that I see if you have a multiple accounts. Or you just want to hide your real identity because you are not proud on what you did as a bounty hunter?

Waiting for your answer...

Indeed, I am very afraid to participate in bounty projects that require KYC, as this is important personal information, should not be known to others. They can use them for bad purposes.

There are projects that require KYC while others do not. In fact, it has both positive and negative sides. To be aggressive is to avoid the spam, cheat account to the campaign, the negative side, we must be clear when our personal information can be used for another wrong purpose.

I think KYC thinks it's very good at avoiding fraud, and this really helps to reduce the fraudulent actions of bounty participants.Maybe in the future everyone's info will upload online and you will do KYC easily.

Actually, this does not need to be complicated for the bounty, the bounty must continue to prepare KYC even though it is not requested by the project manager. And it has become a matter of no surprise that the KYC problem is, at least and it is better that the bounty prepare early before entering the project participants.

KYC and indeed also the bounty has a pretty tight relationship. Moreover, this KYC often help in the success of a bounty. Typically these additional KYC is required as security. because of the bounty with this KYC I value more safe and reliable.

kyc is the rule in a bounty for investors or bounty hunters. we know that the rules in a bounty must be followed, so we can join into it. so many people questioned about kyc and I think they have a reason for that, one of them is the lack of complete identity that must be collected.

Some bounty campaigns have this issue of late announcement of KYC program. I have opinion about this, since i have one bounty campaign which is ended successfuly but bad news come in. "For all bounty hunter, kindly pass your kyc documents". I do not get any reward since i dont have any to pass in, well im not too disappointed since im just social campaign participant but im quite pissed of, what if i do signature campaign.

We will be on war

Most Bounty does not require KYC to get the reward.
And of course I will never join Bounty that requires KYC documents - Keep your private data safe.
Do not "Sell" your sensitive information (Government ID, full name, birthday, Passport...) for some penny.

Most project that goes through kyc doesn't require for kyc from bounty participants before they can get their token or coin

I don't really believe in this thing call know your customer (kyc) so I always ignore projects that ask for kyc because I am not a fan of it

I also think that KYC should be warned in advance, not at the end of the campaign bounty. As a rule, the bounty takes more than one month and it will be insulting that in order to get your honestly earned coins, you must provide your confidential data

I agree with you that KYC should be announced at the beginning of the bounty, but maybe  the bounty managers themselves don't know KYC is requires for bounty hunters from the beginning until the end of the bounty.  It's all decided by the developer team that there is a KYC required. I often experienced this, and it doesn't matter in my opinion. The decision in our hand as a bounty hunter, whether we want to do KYC or not. In order to not miss any information related to bounty including KYC, we as bounty hunters have to read frequently any information in main telegram or bounty telegram.

You are right. Don't try to sell your information because it can used to bad thing, I also don't want to join in bounty that need kyc because you don't know what they will do after they recieved your personal information.

I don't think KYC is really necessary for a  bounty in my own opinion and I don't really think bounty managers should take bounty serious more than necessary on their influencers

Yes you are right, but I do hate KYC when it comes to things like this; bounties! The reason is because some of these are not genuine and they can sell your information on dark web.

The main problem is that I don’t even know what exactly these people do with users information, I don’t know why they even sell it, but whatever reason for that, I believe it is very bad and can lead to several problems which is why anyone giving out their information should be very careful these days.

I actually do think the same thing, I one time witness my friend struggle with the kyc issues but luckily for him, he overcame it. In feel it should also be announced much earlier so as to not inconvenient and create problems for people.

If there is going to be kyc. Those bouty manager should announce KYC as soon as it launches the bouty program instead of announcing it at the end of the program. This will allow participants to prepare KYC from the beginning.there are some scammers in moneytoken bounty. That make the manager launch kyc when its time to distribute the bounty rewards. A lot of people were left aside. So kyc if necessary should be announced in the beginning.

If KYC has been told since the beginning of the Bounty at the start, of course, it very well. Because that way the participants of this project is to know when to use KYC. So if you already know the course they can decide from the beginning will join or not. And those who will join certainly have prepared from the outset to conduct KYC.

KYC is the acronym of Know Your Customers, which means it is only meant for customers and since bounty hunters are not customers, I don't see any reason why they should pass KYC before they can get their token.

I completely agreed to the facts that KYC should be announced from the beginning of a bounty ,many people suffered from the hard blow of revealing the needy of KYC at the end of a bounty ,its painful after so much works for weeks .one other thing,they should announce countries that can't participate in the bounty too at the very beginning .

In my opinion, we should follow their request, because your friend made the request, so it was difficult for KYC, I also experienced and I always overcome the requirements in a easily way

I couldn't agree more. I think it's easier for them to verify KYC at the start of the event. I've seen this happen in a lot of bounty activities. When they finally said it, it was not ethical.

The real reasons is undefined. But  I think that most real reason it is decreasing of Bounty payments. ICO it is businesses and real reason should have clear economic sense.

if it has become a rule in a bounty, then we must obey it. with the kyc we must collect our personal identity. there are many people who support it and some don't. many people can't because they have a reason for that. but as a bounty hunter and also an investor, we must comply with the rules that exist.

I feel happy if KYC is needed to get tokens or coins, because many people have many accounts and it makes me feel disadvantaged. KYC is the right choice to use.

People have been mincing these word together. Even devs are supposed to diffentiate between this two terms: KYC-verification and Bounty hunters. In as much as kyc is meant for customers and bounty hunters are not customers, then they shouldn't be requested to pass KYC.

i think KYC procedure was needed to avoid and pinpoint the cheater, so the Project wont go dump by the cheater whos got a lot of reward by submit multy account.

I am neutral about KYC procedure, but I also think that it should be announced from the very beginning, as some participants do not want to pass it in principle. The forum is usually written that they have the right to change the rules throughout the campaign, so we must be prepared for everything.

You can keep my rewards, im not gonna give them my personal private data for that amount of money  8)

I think the KYC during and after the bounty campaign was a tactic to delay the token distribution especially with the bearish market. This happens a lot in the past. I also agree that the bounty manager had to announce the KYC before the bounty so the participants had an idea and handle it early.

With this a bounty hunter had option if they want to participate or not for privacy reasons.

KYC was respected and followed well by bounty hunters and managers until people started using it as a scam. KYC is now not that used anymore. A few bounty hunters request that bounty hunter does fill these forms. Hunters do hate it though, but if you are to fill and get your tokens, why not?

I agree with this opinion. KYC should be informed at the beginning of launching a bounty campaign so that all participants are ready to provide their data. I joined a number of bounties and needed a KYC, and several times my KYC was rejected. even though I have worked optimally in following each regulation of the bounty manager

more recently, I was strongly against KYS , but looking in the bounty comes crazy number of bots I think KYS exit from this situation. on the other, how to deal with bots I don't know(

This is the best way to do things. The manager should announce that their is KYC before anything starts. If their is KYC in any program, it should be announced before tbr commencement of any bounty

KYC is needed to  bounty program because it can avoid the scammer and fraud. Those people who are very greedy fill the form twice to get more stakes. Now the people pay attention before prior to participate.

Indeed, if a certain ICO will require KYC to the bounty then it is right to declare it in advance so that the hunters will think twice before joining and its better for the hunters to prepare their KYC credentials in advance because i see it all the same procedures and requirements if KYC will really be require. In these ways we could reduce the time to be wasted and the possible delay.

In my opinion, the exposure of KYC in the Bounty was very good to reduce participants who cheated on the Bounty campaign. so it can save tokens from fraudulent bounty participant accounts.

Bounty with KYC I strongly agree with this because having a positive impression besides that with KYC can minimize multiple accounts, we all know that many bounty hunters have multiple accounts.

Well, there is no problem with me if the bounty program needs a process of submitting KYC requirements as a another way of verifying person identity because it can add more security for people who wants to make fraud and scam. And also for criminality act of doing.

I agree with you mate don't hate the Bounty managers,that is not their decision to make the Bounty participants to perform kyc that is CEO decision,because their are some country that cannot participate in their ICO due to SEC regulation or the CEO detect that many cheaters participating in their Campaign.

Not all bounty programs must do KYC Verification. But, if that must include KYC, as participants must do it. Not updating information, I think it's the fault of those who don't see the latest information from the bounty program, or they don't enter the telegram group from the bounty project. Each participant must enter their telegram group to get the latest information about their bounty.

I think KYC is a nuisance and create the gap between users with the project. This is hindered and the negative impact to the project, users will be more skeptical, projects are really good? Personal information is an important issue, the question arises: Project collects personal information of the user to what purpose? There are many ways to fight fraud and the use of the KYC is an unwise

I myself think positively about Kyc as much as possible to minimize cheating. KYC or not is the decision of the development team, as a gift hunter we must follow the rules. Maybe ico asked for a kyc gift and it has nothing to do with the gift manager so don't hate them. even though I don't like KYC for bounty hunters.

That is true. It would be unfair if the KYC will be announce after the bounty program with all the efforts and time that you've commit to that project. I would agree for the bounty manager to announce it ahead of time to receive the tokens that the bounty participants have worked on for a long period of time.

The practice of requiring the passage of a KYC check for participants in the ICO generosity campaign is generally illegal both at the beginning of the ICO company and at its end. This check should only be carried out by investors, and the head hunters are not investors. The KYC check is designed primarily to prevent possible investments of dirty money and the fight against terrorism. What is the attitude of the participants of the ICO generosity campaign, which advertise a specific ICO project? Especially outrageous is the requirement to pass a KYC test at the end of the ICO campaign. This is generally similar to the open fraud of the ICO team and this practice must be eradicated.

this is not good and it is entirely discouraging for bounty hunters, its very unfair why they should decide to have bounty hunters go through KYC at the middle or even at the end of the program, am not in support of this.

am suspecting that most of this bounty managers are doing this probably to intentionally deny many bounty hunters their right of earning tokens after working for them and its very unfair, KYC should be stated at the beginning of any bounty program and not at the end.

maybe KYC can help the projects to become scam so people and especially the investor can feel safe to invest their money with the project. but some of us do not accept if KYC is applying with the participants of the bounty campaign because they feel that they are helping the project to get success in the beginning so the project can continue to reach their goals.

In starting kyc is not imp...abd suddenly they are changing rules which are wrong...but is do for our online safety.kyc is a verification when a custmor use crypto world..it is good so no one can get your information..So i think it is better.

I strongly agree with your opinion, the bounty manager must announce KYC since it was first launched by the bounty so that those who are able to meet the requirements can immediately join and those who cannot fulfill the requirements can choose another bounty, if they announce at the end of the campaign and many participants do not can fulfill the claim claim requirements then this will be a waste of work for participants

that's right, because not all bounty hunters are agree with kyc process, if the bounty hunter will not pass kyc process, they wont be able to receive their reward. that's why they should announce it first if they will undergo kyc for their project or not.

Yep. KYC procedures or requirement shall be informed from the very beginning. HOwever, remember that they also have notes, basically on the general guidelines, wherein they can change some bounty rules including KYC. So I think that's where they can rebut our stand on the KYC. Secondly, there are also circumstances that lead them to require KYC even at the middle of the bounty, such as regulations under which the project or the company handling the project is functioning. So, it is also a risk for bounty hunters to accept such rules and terms in every bounty campaign.

I'm not afraid of providing my information for the bounty manager if needed. There are so many people who playing with us by multiply accounts. This is not fair.

Kyc is the guarantee of generous payments and reliability in the bounty ,. The percentage is much higher for those bounties that require kyc compared to those that do not require, so requesting documents is a step to trust and on this already we are smoothing out I'm impressed that the bounty is better, and it is, bounties that require kyc worth doing without hesitation, a guarantee of generous payments of 100%

Yes it is obvious these days that most projects now want bounty hunters to fill kyc before withdrawing token. It is good because it will help them to get rid of scammers and those with multiple accounts.

unfortunately, in such a situation there is always a chance that our data will reach fraudsters who can use them for their own mercenary purposes. Guarantees of bounty members do not have any

Apparently almost all Bounty companies will soon be demanding the provision of personal data. Perhaps it really is a requirement of the state that the ico company should report how coins are realized.

Thats a new reality, KYC everywhere due to regulations.

The thing is that a lot of projects are clueless about the potential issues when "giving" away their tokens without knowing where those tokens actually go. So a lot of times this revelation comes in the middle of the campaign or at the end when they realize that everything is not that easy.

As for me, this is unnecessary. I do not like revealing my trusty data. It is dangerous. It will never be 100% whether ICO is not a scam and your data is not sold out ...

I agree that KYC is more needed for investors than for participants of generosity, and I think it's right when warned at the beginning of the company about the passage of KYC.

Today there is a real choice where you can choose Bounty Company without registering KYC. But here no one will give a guarantee that this will be a really promising project.

Yes, I agree with the statement that the bounty manager should announce KYC at the beginning, so that participants will better prepare it. I, as a bounty hunter, do not make KYC a problem, the important thing is that the hard work that has been done gets paid in kind, and by getting KYC data security guarantees.

kyc is very important because there are so many investors who participate, so the data from each investor is needed. all of the data is important because it can be one proof and reduce fraud.

Issues of KYC sometimes becomes very disturbing when bounty participants are not giving a prior notice of KYC before the distribution of bounty rewards. i think from now onwards any project that requires KYC should announce it at the very beginning so that bounty participants can be aware before they participate.

Right not most bounties project organisers and manager seems to me more often demanding for k. Y. C which is know your customer. We this helps them identify their customers and also know their nationality I think this is very helpful for a secure project

Kyc is using for avoid money laundering .How can bounty hunter be money launderer ?  he is hard working man who want to earn coins. So kyc for bounty hunters is stupid .

I agree. and also give participants the right to choose. many do not want to participate in the company where you need to pass the KYC. Announcing this at the end of the company is not an honest behavior on the part of the manager

i will neve do KYC if at first i know that there will be.
this is not applicatble.
KYC is just for investors who must not invest with their respective county.
but if a bounty needs that i dont have a choice then.

Thats the problem with most campaign managers i feel its an act of wickedness or they have their own hidden  intentions to be carried out its very painful to work and go through the stress of working for weeks or sometimes months and not get paid please they should change that orientation cause its not funny

i dont think its good for the bounties to be doing kyc because its just wasting of time,,futhermore most campaign will not demand for kyc at start,,but when when they now see that they cant find any means of paying the bounties,they will now requesting for kyc which is not in thw plan,,,so as for me i dont like bounty to be doing kyc

Bounty and k. Y. C which is know your customer quite compliment each know your customer helps bounty project organisers to know more it's investors and bounty hunters this is a security measures

Bullshit. KYC for investors is wether "a security measures" nor a factor for success of ICOs. The team has to be honest, not the investors, so actually it's other way round  ;)

I completely agree with you in the sense that you must declare even at the start of a bounty campaign to pass the KYC. But most often it does not depend on the bounty manager. Such moments are solved by the creators of the project. They can warn about confirmation of KYC only at the end of the campaign bounty, although at the beginning they were silent about it. This is the problem.

I think kyc could be a way that bounty managers use in order to reduce the number of participants that get a reward, as it is know that a lot of people don't like being part of kyc.

He has a very simple motive to have a lot clients. That why they talking about KYC in the end. Firstly they right in that they can make a change in any moment.

and for now every bounty that uses KYC must be notified when the campaign thread is posted, so that those of us who do not like KYC can avoid it and also we will not lose prizes when distributing tokens because KYC is announced when the distribution of tokens will be given

KYC is one of the ways for checking double entries to a particular project and also for verification purposes. I'm not against it but it should be stated in the beginning of each project because not every crypto member is comfortable with it.

I don't really like the idea of bounty for Kyc but there are some bounties we do that requires kyc and if we don't provide it, we don't get our tokens which can be disappointing. Every participant should be aware ahead whether kyc will be required or not for the project.

Personally, I absolutely do not mind the KYC. If the campaigns ask them to pass - it means it's not just that - it means they are obliged to do this by some legislative acts. It is advisable, of course, to know about this at the beginning of the work in the campaign, and not after its end.

KYC is indeed effective for reducing multiple accounts. I also strongly agree if it is informed from the start, so no one will commit fraud in the bounty. And I really agree that as long as our identity is guaranteed security.

Yes, It will be very healthy if devs can mention about KYC before the start. Some members hate this and they should, therefore, be informed about it first before they get into it.

KYC is a compliance requirement for most countries. It is a regulation put in place by Central Banks. This is to avoid Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing. KYC verification is a crucial part of many transactions. I would gladly oblige/ follow the requirement for KYC if needed. However, they will need to provide the clause that they will only use our data / document for verification purposes only. You may email them first before submitting any documents.

I work in Compliance for a Bank. Soo i handle with fake id's on a daily basis.

I have never participated in a bounty campaign that uses kyc because I still doubt identity theft, so I prefer to participate in a bounty campaign as usual on bitcointalk or on bounty platforms like bountyhive, bounty0x and others

I think from now on, every project that requires KYC must announce it at the beginning, so that the bounty participants can be aware before they participate.
KYC problems sometimes become very disturbing when the bounty participants do not give prior notice from KYC before the distribution of prizes.

at the beginning i thought kyc is alright, but after realizing how many ico scam there are, i'm no longer a fan of kyc. i read that scam ico people sell the data in darknet. that's why I'll probably avoid kyc.

Yeah, actually I have opinion about this, since i have one bounty campaign which is ended successfuly but bad news come in. "For all bounty hunter, kindly pass your kyc documents". I do not get any reward since i dont have any to pass in, well im not too disappointed since im just social campaign participant but im quite pissed of, what if i do signature campaign. As we know that some bounty campaigns have this issue of late announcement of KYC program. Right?

When i was still very new to bounty and i had just started signature campaign. The was a project i participated in, it was after the ICO that it announced that bounty hunters should submit their details for KYC. Now, it was not as if i did not have the document to pass KYC, but because it did not announce prior to the start of the bounty, i decided not to participate in the KYC, because i did not trust their system with my details.

Yeah you are right, it is good for bounty managers to state if kyc is required or not before the bounty starts, most people don't like joining program that requires kyc because they are afraid of their personal data been stolen, I think it is very bad for bounty to require kyc when the bounty has finished and ended, it is not good.

This is all due to unscrupulous managers. The need for KYC is clear to everyone, but that's just why not specify its cost at the very beginning...

yes I totally agree with this idea, KYC rules are set from the start of the campaign

There are currently popular, bonus programs in some ICO projects already available KYC. It's not good, when the requirements are downright ridiculous. Perhaps, Bouty is no longer appealing to everyone.

Imo KYC goes agains crypto spirint, privacy and etc. But for an ICO I see not probs, unless there are some retarded things like prove-of-residence

In the past KYC was set later or in the middle of the bounty because the ICO team wasn't aware about the legit stuff and started a bounty without being informed or filling some requirments that require the governments.
But now I see that many bounties require KYC from their participants in order to get paid, some others don't require but still is a risk if they will require at the end of the bounty which is the moment the participants get angry.

You've really raised a very good point, some KYC request for bank account statement and other government issued documents which is confidential to individual, announcing KYC at the end of the bounty program is wrong, all managers should notify every member about the KYC at the beginning of the campaign.

I agree with it. It takes time for you to decide whether you have to give personal information or just leave the bounty without receiving payment. It is been hard when it requires near the end of the campaigns because they give deadline when to submit but you do not have any valid identification card to verify and take long to process. I once joined that kind of bounty and worse thing for me not to comply with the requirement, I gained nothing from it.

KYC Actually it is also good in reducing actions such as cheating by participants to be able to make less fraud happen. but on the one hand this is not good because it is our data and can be misused

I do not submit or participate in KYC related norms generally because I am not sure how will the KYC be misused it. When FB can do it then why can't this unknown guys can misuse your data . Only if I know for sure or some of my friends whom I know have recommended as they might be their friends who have started then only I participate for those bounty with KYC if they require.

strongly agree with what you conveyed, because the announcement about KYC is always at the end of the bounty so that the participants not only doubt but also many who do not know about it so that the tokens are not distributed equally to participants who have completed their tasks.

Yes it is true, to some extent this is a trick that is often used by ICO organizers. Usually, more than half of the budget bounty is saved by devs, because many people refused to pass the KYC.

No reason why bounty hunters should need to do KYC, I'd avoid any bounties asking for it to be honest, not worth the risk.

A bounty manager should announce if the team wants KYC for the bounty participants.
But sometimes even the manager doesn't know that the participants needs to do KYC.
If you will not do KYC as they want then you will not have any prize to claim.

BTW, at the general rules of the bounty page, there is always a memo that the team and the manager have the rights to change any rules.

A lot of people cheating bounty program and join with multiple account, KYC is a best way to reduce cheater, actually KYC is just for ICO Contributor, it's the process of a business identifying and verifying the identity of its clients, prevent cryptocurrencies fund used for illegal activities, as a bounty hunter our privacy and sensitive information already giveaway to project owner after complete the KYC progress

Yes, as much as the investment is risky, KYC is also very risky thinking that you give your personal informations and that makes it risky though is the programs security but how about our security so it is good thing to  announced before the program so people will not surprised at the end of the bounty.

some introduce KYC after the calculation of steaks, and then send coins only to those who passed the KYC procedure. That's tricky...

Rules for the ICO is currently tighter and this form to reduce acts of fraud. A lot of cheating going on so the ICO gives everyone for doing KYC. KYC process and is widely used before the participants get bounty reward. And such a process is already often done.

Many managers do this and it seems to me sometimes it's done specifically so that as few people get their awards. There are a lot of such examples. For example, change the signature rules in the middle of the campaign and you have to go every other day and check whether the number of posts or characters has changed. The same happens with the SCC. The need to provide documents is reported suddenly and gives too little time to pass it

I recently only took part in bounty campaign  and passed KYC. It's easy and does not take much time. In addition, it shows that it is serious project  and that it is not a scam.

Your suggestion is very good, I agree with your point of view, your article needs to be forwarded to more communities, so that more bounty managers can see!

yes I agree, the bounty manager must announce KYC at the beginning they launch a bounty campaign. because there are bounty hunters who are not willing for kyc.

Bounty is some kind of daily work for a lot of people. I think they have a right to know if the campaign requires KYC before they start any bounty. I hate they make major changes about bounty campaigns, minor changes indeed possible.

Well, KYC is something I really don't want to pass, but now I have to do that,due to regulation.
Majority of ICOs launch this kind of process and all hunters and investors are obligated to do that.

They really should announce if they are going to be using kyc for the process before people start signing up for it. Personally I would never register for a bounty that requires kyc to claim your rewards so if I did a bounty and at the end they tell me that I would need to do kyc before claiming my coins then I would feel scammed so they should always state it at the beginning of the campaign, so people know what they are getting into.

I think it is necessary to inform in advance about this. First I have to have a choice. That would be the right decision. In fact, I do not mind passing the KYC.

If you want to get your rewards you need to follow the rules of bounty manager or the team. A lot of bounty hunters are against about the kyc but we have no choice we need  to pass our information. I know you are getting worried to give your identification but we need to trust and hope that nothing bad happens.

It is a very unpleasant situation when the KYC procedure is spoken only at the end, when all the work is done. I'm not against it - but it is better if you will talk about her in the beginning - many people simply will not participate and will earn more who participated

But if they need KYC to expose those hunters with multiple accounts i will support it

I really avoid bounties that have to do KYC,, and i always ask in their telegram group before joining so i always avoid bounties that require KYC,, why do i avoid ??? because i don't want to give my data just to get paid,, KYC is only used by investors to keep the assets they invest,

Yes, it is quite important to know your customer even though it is used only for getting promotions throught social media and like this kind of way doing this promoting. It is very unique way to have security measures with staff behind projects all the above.
Really reasonable expression to take part in this all the way.

Yeah, I Also note about that and have some experiences about passing KYC for bounty. Actually, KYC is for the customers, in this case I think that it is for the investors. However, some bounty participants from some projects are also required to fulfil the KYC to get its reward. I think that since it is valuable enough for the reward, I will involve to fulfil the KYC. But, if it is suspicious and small reward, i will leave it.

I fully agree that managers should at the very beginning to warn you that you will need KYC, and not after you have done the work

I think that it is not so difficult to go through this procedure, unless you want and are afraid, then it is better to abandon this company.

No mate I think it is better. Because some of the peoples are doing same bounty campaign with multiple accounts. also, they are putting the same posts. They are only purposed the earning of money. 

KYC identification is a salvation from a large number of multi-accounts and a chance to increase their earnings on bounty campaigns.

It is probably only good side to making KYC-s. Personally wouldn't do KYC because I am not confident what will they do with my personal information.

Please check the spelling, is it "bounty" or "bouty"?
This is a an academic platform.Well,my opinion. I will say that if you have nothing to hide ,why afraid of kyc?Kyc is good for hunters as it helps to detect cheaters with multiple accounts in a single project.So kyc should be a requirement to receive bounty rewards and this will help to prevent cheating which does not help a project.

yes the bounty manager usually announces that KYC at the beginning of the bounty started, some bounty managers have done it like btcltcdigger and amazix.

it's true that it's not so difficult if the bounty project is convincing is not a problem, we often encounter impromptu KYC that makes many people worry. precisely the procedure is aimed at increasing the security of multiple accounts or other cheating.

Of course, the provision of personal data can solve the problem with Multi accounts in Bounty companies. Nevertheless, each of us is concerned about the safety of our personal data and therefore everyone believes that the provision of KYC and Bounty campaigns are incompatible.

I think KYC is a must pass. This is a guarantee that a single user and a bounty member cannot create content from different accounts. Therefore, it is important and necessary as for me.

Only a few bounties need KYC to receive tokens but not all bounties, I think you can confirm the manager or admin on the telegram about KYC discussions before joining the bounty

I also think that this would be the most correct decision because indeed many of them lose their money because of this.

I believe this topic have been raised here times without no, still yet nothing has been done to help situations as regards it. Instead of seeing changes, things are getting more worse contributing largely to make things worse more than  they have always been.

I don't pass KYC in any projects. Of course, after analyse I give my documents to the ICO. I think that all our documents are published in the Internet for a long time before this ICO

Most of the bounty managers are guilty of this claim because some of them will write it very bold at the beginning of the bounty that there is no KYC but all of a sudden, its the same bounty manager that will announce KYC at the end of the bounty project. I see this as an unjust act by both the bounty manger and ICO team.

in any case, many claim that by providing personal data, the company is confident that the bounty of the company does not involve twins. But it seems to me that they care little.

I also agree that if you need to pass the KYC, you should warn about it in advance. Sometimes managers do not know exactly whether the KYC is provided for some ICO, but in this case they put a note that the passage of the KYC may be necessary.

It is true that it is not too difficult if a convincing gift project is not a problem, we often face KYC that is never finished and makes many people worry. Also, some KYC cannot be updated due to some program errors. That's why participants don't have bounty so they don't even have their tokens.

Yes, I agree when procedures need to be KYC Announces at the beginning of the campaign. Because this is very important to the participants. If the participants already knew that the project use KYC certainly they've prepared from scratch. KYC procedure is indeed until recently many of the participants objected because they felt anxious if their personal data is misused.

I don't like if the KYC is announcing at the end of the bounty because this could make people cannot get the rewards at the end of the bounty. It is better to announce KYC in the beginning so people will know about that and they can decide to join with the bounty or not. I don't want to give my identification because I don't know what they want to do with mine but I don't know what the other people reason is.

Know Your Customer (KYC) is a kind of verification that some projects do employ to proof whether their customers are actually human being or not. It's also a means of having some personal data of their customers.
A lot of bounty hunters do not like KYC probably because the project inform them late or some other reasons.
However, my orientation about KYC as a bounty hunter is that, I do attached more seriously and importance to projects with KYC because I have the feelings that they are more authentic and likely to be more successful which at times my assumption are not true.
My advice to projects that requires KYC is that, it should be stated at the onset of the project and the data of their customers should be properly and ethically handled.

I think that KYC regulations will be announced early, because it will look fair, if it is announced at the end it will be difficult to receive from some bounty participants.

I think the bounty manager should have announced that at the end of the campaign it was obligatory to fill in the KYC, so that if there were bounty hunters who did not want to fill in the kyc they would not join the bounty.

In fact, I don’t mind giving out personal data while participating in a Bounty company. But I would like to know about this at the beginning when I register with the Bounty company.

It is very annoying when programs do not announce kyc during the program and it comes up after the program and sometimes and lasts for e very short period of time with no proper information.It should be announced earlier

Many campaigns speak about passing of verification after completion of a campaign. It is not honest. Successful campaigns do not want to pay.

From my perspective, sometimes it could be of the best interest to honest bounty hunters as KYC will expose and disqualify dubious hunters who sometimes might have signed up with up to 5 alts in a single bounty campaign, even after knowing it is against the bounty rules and regulations.
But still, that doesn't justify the fact that it should have been stated when starting the campaign.

I think sometimes bounty managers or project's marketing team consciously do not express KYC rule at the beginning of the bounty. So they have more participants and when distribution starts the pay less.  KYC should be announced before the program starts, if not, they do not have such right after bounty ends. But it is our mistake, we should not follow such manager's bounties and we have to fud such projects. So other bounties cannot cheat bounty hunters.

I also act in a similar way, but in one campaign the rules of participation changed at the end of the campaign and in order to receive the award it was necessary to pass the KYC. It is a pity that it is impossible to punish the project developers for changing the rules.

Bounty managers often are hired professionals, which are not a part of the team. Also during the process of preparation to ICO team decides, should they introduce KYC for bounty hunters or they will risk a bit with the interpretation of the law so they themselves may do not know.

Well, usually in the bounty which require kyc usually pay very well , well, I can say that I was caught , so I think in such bounty, few involved people

Even if the manager from the very beginning will report about KYC, the participant just won't participate in him. If he doesn't want to transfer the personal information to someone, then doesn't matter when the manager reports about need. Often happens that even he doesn't know whether the KYC company will carry out or not.

KYC brings a lot of inconvenience. I don't like it when the bounty changes the terms at the end.

Eventually every bounty program announce the KYC in the starting stage. But sotimes we found in the end. But that's the bounty manger who making things more hard. Good managing teams knows the time and importance of KYC but some don't care. Even so many scammers also in bounty that's why also it's important KYC.

Hi there!
 
Definetly KYC needs to be announced befor the bounty instead of afterwards, imo bounty and airdrops dont need KYC at all.
You aint a custumor more a employe in terms of bounty.

Kyc is needed when you buy something not when you earn them.

Greetings! 8)

If under the terms of the bounty campaign is necessary KYC, then I fulfill the conditions.  Mostly for this I use a driver's license.  But if they demand a KYc at the end of the campaign, I think that this is not fair to the participants and is a fraud.

Although the ICOs have all the power to add extra requirements or new rules in their project, I think it's a rather suspicious move, since many bounty hunters like me, do not participate in ICOs that require KYC, and indicating it at the end of the bounty is something quite scummy and untrustful

You are quite right that bounty managers should have disclose information concerning kyc to bounty participants at the beginning of the bounty but the truth is that most times, bounty managers are also ignorant of the fact that kyc will be required from the beginning. They might also become away towards the end of the bounty campaign.

Please revise the title of the post. You wrote the wrong word "Bounty"

KYC, for Bounty campaign, is not as terrible as it paints. It is what I can see with the experience of the Bounty campaigns that I have participated.
In all the times that I participate, they have given enough time to send the documents. Only participants should be aware of the Bounty manager updates usually in Telegram.

KYC is supposed to be confidential and everyone definitely doubts if had to submit personal data. KYC and I think should be informed from the very beginning of the project will begin. So that all the participants to join in the project, they've prepared since the beginning. And when personal data are needed they are already ready to fill.

Although I am against the KYC procedure, I am against this procedure only for investors. But the participants of the bounty must pass it, so much to reduce the number of scams among the participants. But the Manager should announce the need for this procedure at the very beginning. For some reason I can not pass KYC and then all the work was done in vain

I personally consider this a fraud when, by bringing the company to bounty until completion, managers put forward the rules for passing KYC and find reasons for non-payment of laid coins

many indeed statement regarding KYC is informed at the end of bounty and this is not fair. When does require at least this KYC is informed from the beginning because it will certainly be a consideration whether to follow it or not. many are doubtful against the security of the KYC and surely this will be a hindrance in the results.

I agree with you. It's not fair. However, you cannot do anything here, because it is written in the rules of the bounty of campaigns that the rules can be changed. As a result, one has to either not participate in such bounty campaigns or agree to their terms.

I have a neutral attitude towards KYC, but I also think that it should be announced from the very beginning of the bounty campaign. Otherwise, it looks like the project just wants to save money, and to pay less tokens to some participants who in principle do not want to give their data and personal information.

I agree to implement the Kyc program because it can minimize abuse of accounts. But what if the project is scam then we will feel disadvantaged. Is there a possibility to abuse Kyc's data

I have a negative attitude towards KYC in bounty company. But if there is a KYC, it must be declared in the General rules at the very beginning of the company so that everyone knows that the bounty company conducts KYC.

Personally, I am suspicious of those projects where they are asked to send their documents. I do not understand why this is necessary for the project, where the developers themselves hide their personal data.

KYC is a proof of ownership we pass the identity we give to the manager, but KYC is not a decision from the manager, but from the team, it is difficult for us when the KYC process is carried out when the bounty is over, but it is our risk that must be faced as a bounty hunter .

Just tell me why you need to go through KYC to take part in the bounty? it's so stupid, because bounty hunters do not pay anything, they definitely should not figure among investors, because KYC was created for investors.

I agree with you. If kyc is necessery in that bounty Bounty managers should do that ann before ending time. Also the other thing is in my opinion kyc is really unnecessery for bounties..
Because icos doing that kyc for anti money laundering etc. but in bounties we are not giving any money to anyone.. They are giving to us useless tokens.. so why kyc needed ? for bounties.. terrible.

If the ICO has the KYC for the Investors then we should do it also as a bounty hunter.
Well, it is not good for anyone of us, it is all for the ICO side goods.
But still It is on the team decisions to make KYC or not.

It is a normal situation for a bounty program that the ICO team requires to do KYC. This process helps to identify a lot of scammers and people that are using multi accounts to earn more from one campaign. KYC process is great and the less participants will pass it, the rewards would be.

I believe that KYC for bounty participants is a very good thing, because it prevents scam and cheating from unfair bounty participants.

This is what I think too, if you are organizing a bounty that is going to require kyc to get out the rewards of the bounty then you might as well put it at the announcement so that people will know what they are signing up for instead of allowing people to sign up for bounties and after finishing they find out that they have to do kyc which they do not want to do

Yes, that's why most bounty campaigns now require KYC. There are too many cheats and there are too many bot/multi accounts. KYC will solve all of these problems, but not 100% but it will limit a lot and honest bounty hunters will get more than the tokens

The KYC part should be announced before the bounty commence or early in bounty days for the bounty users to know that KYC is required. Because most of the bounty hunters right now still dont have the valid requirements to pass KYC.

Kyc is just a few steps to know your costumer,and its a part usually when we participate in a bounty,so yes lets coordinate with them and support their  needs in times of providingbour self identity for a reasons.,so for us lets just be aware and alert to those unidentified or scammers.

No time for verify KYC at bounty campaign, when seeing at the first time at bounty tread, I try check needed KYC or not before joining, without KYC for getting payment I will joined and need KYC I will leave their project.

Yes, must be KYC announce early in the campaign, so that the participants know about it. If participants already know since the beginning, naturally they will also prepare their personal data. But there are some people who do not agree about the project campaign gifts to use KYC. Because according to them handing over private data is too risky.