Bitcoin Forum

Other => Meta => Topic started by: The-One-Above-All on July 31, 2019, 10:41:15 AM



Title: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on July 31, 2019, 10:41:15 AM
Local rules - this is a discussion regarding the observable instances of DT members engaging in clearly negative and untrustworthy behaviors only. Those on default trust DT1 DT2 DT3 may be discussed and nobody else.

** it is possible there is some incorrect information here, however NOTHING we have seen leads us to believe it is incorrect currently. We will amend this post if it comes to light any parts of it are incorrect.


So our DT has been taken over by a bunch of people that are OBSERVABLY DIRTY.  These people have been allowed to game the merit system,  rewarding each other for their low functioning spew and now due to a genius level design they are AUTOMATICALLY "trust worthy" ??

Oh really? so although Theymos seems to only just be waking up to the FACT that many of these scum bags on DT will do or say ANYTHING to ensure they remain in DT and merit cycling circles here. He seems not to have noticed they leverage these positions to ENSURE they grasp hold of the highest paying and most lucrative sig spots via their PALS who (also DT and merit cyclers).

If this was not enough...  the clues are

1. They mostly all cycle merit to each other
2. They mostly  all vote to include each other on DT (via their foolishly given right to be the ones to decide on WHOM is eligible for DT)
3. They mostly all seem to be creaming off the best paying (in btc) sig spots via their pals who are campaign managers.
4. The central cluster of Dirty Turds also seem to exclude the same people from dt.
5. They will use the "TRUST" system to punish whistle blowing of their prior observable wrong doing.




If you happen to be dumb enough NOT to clearly see how this operates then try reading over this thread a few times until it penetrates your skull.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5088852.0

It is clear the entire systems of control reward and encourage gaming of these broken systems and that they are WIDE open to gaming and manipulation.


If that was NOT ENOUGH let us examine some OBSERVABLE INSTANCES  of their prior wrong doing that is UNDENIABLE.

THIS LIST WILL BE UPDATED AS WE HAVE THE TIME AND INCLINATION. Feel free to add your own RELEVANT and ON TOPIC information regarding the observable prior behaviors of DT members that demonstrate they are clearly not suitable for a position of trust.


Without further ado - The DIRTY TURDS or as we know them DT members.

Investigate these for yourselves to confirm, they are fully verifiable - unless they have done a nutildah and gone and edited their post histories trying to mislead people about their past wrong doings.


TMAN

This person is clearly a low functioning imbecile. We have previously challenged it to present it best original thought inspiring posts for analysis (since his account was showered in merits to boost it from hero to legendary. He could not provide ANYTHING of real value or merit. He claims he is given merit because people find his swearing and sexual deviant ramblings are entertaining. So he has zero value with regard reaching the optimal solution or opinion. He simply does not have the capacity to add any kind of value to this board.

He is also implicated in some VERY dirty and dangerous behaviors here.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1764757.0

His known PALS both owlcatz and lauda are both implicated in the same extortion attempt.

Seems Tman also is not above a bit of scamming directly when it suits him (we quote OG below who discovered this)

"TMAN used minerjones to anonymously auction a KIALARA and then attempted to manipulate the auction by stating, "wow this has to be a record low for a sub #100 serial. if I didn't have so many I would be snapping this up"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1931778.msg19286369#msg19286369

Admission it was his auction:
"Dude I haven't crossed paths with OG in over 6 months, it wasn't until he derailed my auction hosted by MJ that this kicked off."
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1946142.msg19349060#msg19349060 "


Tman has also admitted in black and white that he used the trust system to punish those that present observable instances (facts) of wrong doing by his friend Lauda.

You can not red trust for fact based posts.

Can, have and will.

if you don't like it I suggest you petition all other DT-1 members to exclude me or if they feel that my tagging of you is not needed or accurate they will reach out to me like adults and have actual fluid conversations

so - Like it or fuck off back to your hole.


xxxx laters sexy pants

Tman blackmailing people buying some debt for 1 satoshi then trying to use threats to get the person to pay him magnitudes more under threat 

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5206130.msg53238785#msg53238785

Tmans shit posting, low level swearing and sexual deviance

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5138619.msg50867819#msg50867819


This DIRTY TURD is currently a merit source and DT.  Time to flush that filthy piece of shit.


Nutildah

This idiot has gone as far as to define himself EVIL and willing to knowingly facilitate scams for a price.

In 2014 he was running around this board screaming for people to have negative trust for selling accounts here. He claimed they were EVIL and knowingly facilitating scamming.

In 2016 he decided to turn EVIL and knowingly facilitate scamming himself for the small price of 0.3BTC which was the price he offered his account for sale for.

Later (like many months later) SOMEONE announced from the nutildah account it was no longer for sale.


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5134507.msg50719875#msg50719875

So he is either

1. EVIL and willing to facilitate scamming

or

2. A liar who now claims he never sold the account and is the original nutildah.

He has also abused the trust system to try to discredit people that have whistle blown on his prior actions.  Now he starts some "official trolling poll" it looks like quite a few persons on that poll are certainly NOT trolls and their posts and central points have never been refuted successfully. It looks like another attempt to TRY to discredit whistle blowers and silence those who mention these DIRTY TURDS prior observable wrong doing.

TO DATE NO DT HAS GIVEN HIM RED TRUST ALTHOUGH MANY LOVE TO SLAP RED ON OTHER ACCOUNT SELLERS/BUYERS. Those that certainly do not knowingly wish to facilitate scamming or want to turn evil. His pal lauda said there is nothing that can be said that would cause him to red trust nutildah. Sounds like some serious double standards don't ya think???


Lauda or LaudaM

Well, where does one start with this filth bag. Scammer, liar, trust abuser, implicated in extortion schemes and shady looking escrow deals.

If a persons should even present observable instances of his wrong doing he plastered their accounts with red trust, that was doubled up on by TMAN, Owlcatz and Yogg the fool.

Here read Lauda the (prior) MOD, DT, - one of the most widely trusted members here (by other scumbag DT members)  These corrupt bunch of shit stains would not even remove him from DT after seeing this evidence many times.  Even at the request of Theymos they would not remove this filthy piece of scamming dirt. Finally he was removed from DT1 by theymos manually. NOT for all this prior observable scamming and dangerous actions but it seems because he was still determined to use the trust system to silence any critic of his.  For some reason his OBVIOUS prior abuse still remains as a mark other members accounts WHY??

Enjoy Lauda's CV for a trust position. We quote our own prior investigative work and that of others investigative work below.

1.  lauda, owlcatz , tman - extortion attempt which many senior members believe WAS a real attempt to extort another member

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1764757.0

a/ what flag is suitable for a directly effected member
b/ what flag is suitable for a concerned member that was not directly effected?

2. laudas et als shady looking escrow dealings concerning 3000BTC

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4895354.msg44083126#msg44083126

a/ what flag is suitable for a directly effected member
b/ what flag is suitable for a concerned member that was not directly effected?

3. laudas PROVEN lie for financial gain (SCAMMING) that he was on the launch of xcoin/dark and there was NO Instamine whilst holding bags of it.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=560138.msg6748208#msg6748208

a/ what flag is suitable for a directly effected member?
b/ what flag is suitable for a concerned member that was not directly effected?

If you say you would encourage others to read though his post history you got a scam tag which his friends Tman, Yogg and owlcatz then doubled down on when you started to point out that people should be made aware of their trust abuse. SCUM BAGS that are still on DT ???


This Dirty Turd has been semi- flushed but there are serious stain marks left in the bowl.  

xtraelv

Undeniable scammer supporter. Claims the observable instances in the intial post are NOT grounds for red trust and are not scamming. Claims that Tmans auction scamming deliberate deception for financial gain and trying to punish and shut down other members giving fair appraisal of the item is not scamming or financially high risk behavior. He claims that is behavior that is fully acceptable from a DEFAULT TRUST member here. He is also on default trust due to the mutual back scratching support from other undeniable scammers aside from tman.

He claims that deceiving people deliberately for financial gain is not scamming it is  "ONLY MAKING COMMENTS"  which anyone is allowed to do he says, so presumably if you only lie or scam using words here you can adopt the "ONLY MAKING COMMENTS" defense and you will be okay. Well if you are DT friend of xtraelv that is. If you are not he will red trust you for " not answering questions" about "possible" scamming.

Also started some very worrying under age sex references several times that he seemed to keep going on about even though there was no reason for him to suddenly bring that up (except in his over fucked up mind)  Go read his excuses and bullshit to excuse UNDENIABLE SCAMMING.

This post is our summary of his moronic slobbering and scammer defending.  But if you want his actual imbecilic words track back a few pages from this post..

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170789.msg53001936#msg53001936

SCAMMING FOR MONEY using only words is " ONLY MAKING COMMENTS". anyone is free to make comments xtraelv says.

If you are not DT members I am not sure the " ONLY MAKING COMMENTS" defense will work for you.  I mean don't try making comparisons with xtraelv, he claims having independently verifiable undeniable observable instances of his friends undeniable scamming....is the same as him accusing you with no evidence of stealing a giraffe and killing it. A person devoid of all logic and reason. Highly financially dangerous, perhaps so more than the scammer tman who does not will not even deny it was scamming. His crazy excuses are hilarious go view the xtra elv policeman sketch and compare them to his excuses on the prior pages. That is NOT us just messing with him. Look at his excuses.




VOD

This idiot uses the trust system to punish a person for requesting he presents some form of evidence before repeating an accusation against one of the most trusted members of this board. YES gives red trust because you will not allow him to sully your thread with ANOTHER repetition of a prior accusation (that is there 2x already) without presenting evidence. A fucking nut case.

Also thinks it is fine to dox a forum treasurer placing both them and the boards funds in danger.

Supporter (by inclusions) of MANY other observably untrustworthy scum bags on this board.

Another scared little bitch who is intimidated by lauda and his gang - this clearly demonstrates the systems of control are broken and that he is weasel and pussy. Read his quotes in the post below.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5137144.msg50915510#msg50915510

Not the very most stinky of the DIRTY TURDS here but still one that needs to be flushed.


Yogg

This person is possibly an Alt of lauda or Tman or Owlcatz. A total abuser of his trust position. This dumb untrustworthy piece of shit believes that if someone ADMITS to giving you red trust for posting facts about observable prior wrong doing (OF HIS FRIENDS OR ALTS) then if you say if you don't remove the TRUST ABUSE (given for whistle blowing) you will be making sure everyone knows about what happens... Then YOGG will say that is reason to back up his PALS trust abuse and add more red trust.

Yogg of bitcoin talk is untrustworthy I would advise against using any services provided by user yogg of bitcointalk as we view him as highly untrustworthy and keeps company and supports those that are OBSERVABLE scammers and liars.

We would say you can consider yogg of bitcointalk a proxy or alt of lauda or tman.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5098315.0


HHampuz

Another dirty scumbag with a fine pedigree of supporting scammers trust abuse and many other fine examples of UNTRUSTWORTHY behaviors.

Investigate him for yourselves. Start here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5147938.msg51448589#msg51448589 and also take note of the initial post in that thread.

Supporting Lauda and Tman regularly and the supporting of the doxing of our forum treasurer is really an indication of the sort of dirty turd we are dealing with here.


LFC_Bitcoin (Lauda's Felching Clown)

This is a spineless, weak and pathetic individual that was CLEARLY DEMONSTRATED to be a BITCH of lauda's gang.

He will even turn against his "supposed" friends out of fear for losing favor with his masters on this board.

Lauda's Feltching Clown -

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5136759.0

Read above thread.

Can be considered a proxy or alt of lauda in our opinion. His posts before 2017 are thousands of 1 liner speculation crap. Low value bitch and slime ball.  Not to mention a trust abusing piece of dirt.


The Pharmacist AKA Huge Black Woman.

The smarmacist, a sneaky snake tongued fool. Lecturing others on financially motivated shit posting and "trolling". Then what do we find out about this weasel?

He has been sneakily using a sock puppet account to racist troll spam ANOTHER sig for extra btc dust. This other puppet racist sig spamming troll account is HugeBlackWoman

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1702409.msg17808231#msg17808231

Only others are trolls and financially motivated shit posters.

The funny thing is he got busted whilst trying to move from one sig to a higher paying one. Sneaky devious and double standards shit poster.  Ask him to present his best thought inspiring posts and he can NOT. He is not capable of producing posts with original value. When asked what his best achievements on this board were in all the years he has been here he said that is was....GETTING ON TO A HIGHLY PAID SIG CAMPAIGN.

Has until recently been a HUGE supporter of the proven liar and scammer lauda, including him on DT, and many other dirt bags like Tman ect.  A truly corrupt and disgusting little gimp.  He said once he did not know if lauda scammed people or not with the escrow but he would SUPPORT HIM ANYWAY regardless. Apparently out of loyalty. Sounds like just the person you want on DT.

Calls out observable instances of truth as TROLLING to try to discredit whistle blowing.

Not the worst of the worst, but people like this sneaky double standards little shit entrench the REAL bad guys into positions of power. Should be removed from DT and merit source at a minimum. Take his sig away and watch that account never post again. His ONLY redeeming quality seems there is a limit to the depth he will plant his tongue in laudas ring piece. He flat out refused to exclude bill gator so we can perhaps leave him his sig for now the broke down bum and hope he improves his behavior. Perhaps hope for this scum bag in the future but we don't see any market improvement regarding branding observable instances of truth as TROLLING. Idiot.


Suchmoon aka suchmoron.  Not bad BBW open to offers if wins. Face ntb I guess and we have a hot air balloon crashed in a field near our place to cover the rest. Get your votes in now. If you're a breast man then change your votes to suchmounds now you will NOT be disappointed. This information is based upon a possible photo of suchmoon that someone shared with us. If it turns out to be a big guy with lots of back hair then that's life on bitcointalk - got to get bones interested as well.


Seems to be a front man for the gang of liars and scammers and other untrustworthy scum bags.  No observable financially motivated wrong doing and does not spam a sig NOW A CHIPMIXER SIG SPAMMER LIKE MANY OF THE OTHER DIRTY TURDS HERE. That is where the good news ends with this fat slob. She includes many of the MOST untrustworthy shits on this board on to DT. She is possibly an alt of lauda. We say this on the basis that she was always found kissing Theymos ass hole UNTIL Theymos must have been fed a RED PILL and suddenly realized that EVERYTHING we had been saying about Lauda using the trust system to punish whistle blowers and just generally using it for his own purposes was TRUE. Theymos even then decides to be nice to lauda and not just announce lauda is blacklisted for being a scumbag and trust abuser. Rather theymos asks over 100 other members to simply exclude Lauda from DT. I mean considering Lauda is a proven scammer and implicated in ALL manner of other untrustworthy actions seems quite fucking reasonable. Suchmoon then stabs theymos in the back trying to spin that THEYMOS is now being sneaky and devious and that is NOT APPROPRIATE to request a proven liar, scammer and trust abuser implicated in many other financially motivated wrong doings is removed from a position of TRUST LOL

Yeah because to be sneaky you would send it to 100 of laudas known pals and that is so unreasonable. So suddenly suchmoon trys to spin this kind act into a negative sneaky and heavy handed action??? why react like that after kissing theymos ass forever?  seems like there is some VERY CLOSE connection between the lauda account and the suchmoon account.

Also gross double standards from this slob. Has given red trust to people for supporting or advertising for "possible scams" then decides to include on DT a proven liar and scammer also implicated in MANY other financially motivated wrong doings.

She also tried to claim bill gator was UNTRUSTWORTHY for presenting a PM from Lauda's Feltching Clown because she claims these are PRIVATE messages and can not be presented in public. Then it was found SHE HERSELF had posted in public other members private messages to her.

Suchmoon spent weeks pretending to believe merit is a valid and reliable metric that is not subjective manipulated junk that is gamed and dangerous ( so her and her pals can continue gaming it to control rank and trust score of other members). Then she debunked her entire argument by saying that "good poster" and " bad poster" are MEANINGLESS terms without strict definition and criteria to measure them against. LOL suchmoron.

Tries to get people banned straight after they dare to disagree with her or the gang (she supports) agenda here. Her suspected sock puppet is ScumBuster. Uses the gamed metric of deleted posts and some weak sauce copy and paste crap to target specific individuals. Sneaky and devious.

Certainly not DT material nor merit source. Perhaps not a scammer but certainly a supporter and protector of known scammers and liars and still a Dirty Turd that needs flushing. Only worth engaging with if you like to have some banter with a BBW.



Owlcatz

Implicated in the same extortion attempt with her dirty turd pals Lauda and Tman. Also seems to run to double down on the trust abuse that her pals lauda and tman leave to try to cover their skid marks on this board. They think by slapping red trust on your account that it stops people believing in the independently verifiable instances of their prior wrong doing.

Also includes the same bunch of lying and scamming dirt bags she apparently tries to extort with and trust abuse with.

Not really worth any further mention. Pretty much just another proxy of lauda and tman.

Agent foxpoop aka foxpup. - the merit fountain that new stops giving to his fellow merit cycling dirty turd pals, often for total shit posts. If you try to scrutinize his statements/opinions (which he voices as if they are valid rebuttals) he will simply say opinions don't need to be based upon reasoning. So presumably anything he says must be discounted until you validate it for yourself. Like his opinion of the other dirty turds being trustworthy perhaps lol.. I mean of course you want to make some a merit source and give them a TON of merits to hand out based on his " opinions" on the value of their post. You can see where that may be a problem haha. I mean if you can not then just take a look at some of his merit allocations. I mean if you are ever found giving Tman a merit then this really should be instance blacklisting and investigation into possible sexual deviance haha

nullius aka nerdius or noobius

The waffling nerd speak twat is a lauda scammer support. This account bounced back after 1 year slobbering around in mommy's basement to launch a TRUST ABUSE on poor old CH for..... yep apparently because cryptohunter said, that although peasant plagiarists should be banned it is in bad taste to ridicule their stories of hungry families and lives of abject poverty. NERDIUS says that "suggesting" that people should not ridicule them is UNTRUSTWORTHY and certainly reason to fear trading with CH. NERDIUS says that even though he was starving and poor once, he feels no empathy (actually he has previously made a lengthy boring and pathetic post where he states he does not have empathy and empathy is something to distance yourself from of course backed up by another sociopath (lauda).  These couple of filthy dumb cunt peasants say other peasants deserve no empathy now that they have succeeded in assuring themselves regular food from scamming or supporting scammers it seems. He seems to often boast he was one of the most merited and even had merits from gmax. WHO GIVES A FUCK. This nerd is a low functioning twerp who has sat there memorizing other peoples hard work and polishing his English. However you can NOT polish a turd. He seems to be trying to emulate the posting style of anonymint (but failing miserably) also anonymint would not be easy to crush in debate like nerdius.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5214166.0

Keep an eye on this dirty lauda assfeltcher. Looks like another sociopath that will hang with the worst scammers asslicking them in public whilst seeking spurious grounds to trust abuse honest members who speak up against his scamming pals.


Other turds that need flushing that are not even worthy of making the poll.



Adolphinwolf  - this dumb piece of shit thinks you can give people a scam tag for self moderating their own thread and deleting garbage with no supporting evidence. Also supports scammers and liars. Trust abuser and general scum bag.

Direwolf ( or something like that, we can't even be bothered to remember his username it's such a low functioning burger flipping dreg) claims that observable truths (facts) like the pharmacist also being HugeBlackWoman are actually the OPPOSITE of facts. Trying to discredit the truth is UNTRUSTWORTHY. Supports scammers being on DT also.

SaltySpitoon - seems to think he can change his definition of "words" to their opposite to protect a proven scammer like lauda. We mean change the definition within just one thread to one that suits him better when the rest of his argument was debunked.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153864.0

Not sure if he is untrustworthy or was just exposed to some lemon extract that day.

1miau - Liar, trust abuser and general imbecile. Seems to lack comprehension of the English language also. Supporter of other untrustworthy scum bags. Flush this turd asap.

Bitmover - trust abuser and general idiot. Thinks he can use your account as an example of one that requires further punishment and then when you stand up for yourself he says it is unfair to make a sensible and credible defense and call him out for being thick as shit.  Thinks you can have a scam tag for this?? fucking bozo... ah that reminds us.

Moronbozo - known to his pals as marlboroza or some stupid name. Trust abusing scum bag and supporter of scammers and liars like lauda. Tried to give a true legend a scam tag by tricking him with "scare quotes" mixed in with other REAL quotes of what the true legend had  said previously. Makes up strange accusations like you are a spammer of....... WORDS. Yep no more spamming words. Dumb fool that needs to be flushed with the other turds stinking up the board. More weird and annoying than anything else. He seems incapable of making a clear point. Well tbh there is not much it seems capable of except being a general fool and entertainment.

Lafu - dumb ass shit poster who is also a trust abuser. Supporter of liars and scammers on DT. Also associated with an exchange that looks to have pulled a huge exit scam. Beware of this snake.

o_e_l_e_o - some low functioning fool and ass licker. Not really worthy of even a mention but still a dirty turd supporter.

mosprognoz - or some shit name is a scammer supporter and moronic troll, that claims presenting observable instances of financially motivated wrong doing my DT members = mental illness and trolling. Clearly a supporter of LAUDA if not lauda himself. Showing a nice willingness to work and profit WITH scams he has defined as scams himself previously. That thread was archived once he started to BLACKMAIL and extort eddie and even turned nasty on poor old chunky trunks suchmoon, trying to claim she is perhaps guilty of scamming people (this is largely believed to be untrue to be fair to her or at least unproven). These types are only nice whilst you let them scam or work with scams for their own profit.

Erratic judgement ? Could you please quote some of them and prove that they are Erratic ?

Bankera is a scam:

I can't do anything else. All what I could I have done. Now there are undeniable facts that bankera is a scam supported by bunch of paid shills and spammers. Remember my word. After one year the situation will be even worse.  I am out of here. Enjoy talking to yourselves and riding a dead horse.

But maybe they could make you some money if they could run your "friend's" ICO?

Is it possible to run a ICO via bankera exchange ? My friend is planing one, and searching for an exchange for doing ECO (Exchange Coin Offering.) That can be very profitable for all of us. Whom shell I contact to get an answer for that ? Thanks in advance.

And a scam again, I guess they didn't take your "very profitable for all of us" offer?

It is a well masked PONZI scheme.



Hilarious and co/ Hilarious etc

This mod is CORRUPT and bias. He supports KNOWN and PROVEN scammers on to DT1. He deletes on topic relevant posts of those that go against the group of dirty turds. He refuses to delete a low value garbled insult like this

Here she goes again, who put a dollar in the cunt?

He posts off topic irrelevant crap in the " funny threads section"  and when you voice an objection or post your own on topic reply he just moderates your post away.
Starts crying if you suggest sigs should be removed ( He spams 2 sigs)
Says your posts are rubbish then when challenged to present the rubbish posts he refuses and says I can believe they are rubbish if I want.
Scum bag

Flying Hellfish

Another dumb ass in a mod position. How can someone as thick as shit like this be allowed to be so obviously bias and be permitted to stay in a mod position??.
Should be flushed with his turd idols like tman and lauda (same fortunejack sig spammer) possible alt of tman, lauda, all those fortunejack spammers sound VERY similar at times. Beware and keep an eye on him.





These lower level micro turds need to be kept well away from positions of trust.




LOTS MORE COMING SOON

All backed with observable instances of clear wrong doing get ready to vote for the stinkiest DIRTY TURD on this board.










Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on July 31, 2019, 10:43:09 AM
Reserved for more Dirty Turds.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Lauda on July 31, 2019, 11:34:30 AM
I'm no longer DT, thus remove me from this list and cry somewhere else about your pathetic life kiddo. :-*


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Foxpup on July 31, 2019, 01:14:00 PM
I'll gladly take Lauda's place. The observable dirtiness of my foxhole can hardly be in dispute. :P


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: suchmoon on July 31, 2019, 01:14:46 PM
Seems like your new trollthread is working - you're currently leading the troll poll: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5168331.0


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: nutildah on July 31, 2019, 01:20:48 PM
Seems like your new trollthread is working - you're currently leading the troll poll: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5168331.0

Well, there's no better way to troll a troll poll than a poll made by a troll...

Bravo OP, really working hard to win my poll with this mountain of text I will never read. Kudos for your perseverance in... whatever it is you are trying to do.

Oh, also, your subject title needs more question marks. Not sure if its a question or if you're just trolling.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: LoyceMobile on July 31, 2019, 01:30:04 PM
I'm no longer DT
You're still DT2. And I'm bored enough to open a topic from am ignored user.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: mosprognoz on July 31, 2019, 02:41:40 PM
I'm no longer DT

Don't pay attention to trolls and scammers. You are still DT and I trust you. I removed you from my trust list and the system still showing me your feedback as trusted. I did that, to check if you are still DT. Now I will add you to my trust list again.



Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The Sceptical Chymist on July 31, 2019, 04:02:17 PM
You're still DT2.
That's always been good enough to get complaints from everyone--at least it was back before Theymos changed everything up.

The only DT members listed by OP who've been involved in real drama are Vod and Lauda.  Everyone else is sort of new to DT and haven't had many accusations against them except from angry trolls.  And none of them need to be flushed out of the system IMO.

You know, I thought all of this crap had died down.  The troll brigade has been at this since late last year.  How long can you keep protesting in the face of mass indifference before you realize the problem isn't external?


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: suchmoon on July 31, 2019, 04:09:01 PM
How long can you keep protesting

As long as we keep feeding them I think. All they want is some sort of soapbox, the soothing sound of their own voice, and the warm feeling of someone noticing them.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on July 31, 2019, 04:25:43 PM
Lots of predictable replies from the observable dirt bags here.

Look you sniveling wretches and bottom feeding ass feltchers like moronpigsnoz ( or whatever your shitty turd world name is that we can't be bothered to waste time on) IT IS VERY SIMPLE... all you have to do is make a successful refutation of the Observable wrong doing and double standards we have presented and we will remove or update them. Take your time, there is no hurry.

There is no point screaming TROLLING.. when people can verify these observable instances for themselves.

This is the issue idiots like nutildah face. They scream trolling but then can not demonstrate that these "trolls" have presented any incorrect information.


So in their minds


Inconvenient Truths regarding their prior wrong doing = TROLLING  lol

Sorry dip shits that is not Trolling, that is simply the presentation of observable instances that you WISH to deny but can not.

People voting on that stupid troll poll can not demonstrate that our posts contain incorrect information.  Since most of them refer to observable instances on this board then they should have no trouble doing so. THEY CAN NOT.

To all those other concerned dirt bags that are worried they will not get a mention like: Agent foxpoop, suchmoron, et al. Do not worry, this poll should allow persons to change their votes so it will be running for quite some time whilst we get the odd moments to compile your observable dirty deeds and double standards.


Mean time just support your scamming lying dirt bag pals that are basking in their rightful glory here in their DIRTY TURDS poll. Your time will come scumbags.  We will ensure you get all the attention you deserve.

Nutildah is one of our new fav bitches to slap around with their prior observable behaviors. How dare that EVIL SCAM FACILITATING, Micro btc loan begging dreg start a trolling poll on meta.

Nutildah hahaha .. just a few extra tit bits regarding that div. Apparently Nutildah was a NEM stakeholder (worth 300BTC ALONE) and early dash investor. Been here since 2014 (apparently) recently begging for 0.02btc loans. Haha imagine that kind of skill. To end up a broke down bum after all of that opportunity just slipped through its dirty little turd world paws. Now left sig spamming ANY PIECE OF SHIT dangerous scheme for micro dust. Nutildah will even dispute flags (if he is being paid) that other DT's (and they are corrupt scum don't forget) are forced to recognize are dangerous to other members for some micro btc scraps. Imagine what he will do for 0.3BTC - well, actually you do NOT need to imagine because  he already told you all he will turn EVIL and knowingly facilitate scams for 0.3BTC right?

DT and merit source we believe. Haha - what a perfect choice for both of those.

Who wants nutildah level investment advice? I mean look at his merit score. He must know his stuff right? I mean that level of trading talent must take some serious knowledge and study?  right?  Where are the Nutildah trading tips I want to send them to bezos and gates. Those 2 need to know what it feels like to live in the pharmacists shoes (well trainers with holes in).  

Nutildah aka THE ANTI-MIDAS - quick shower him in merits for his stupidity and false claims of trolling where he can present no counter argument.


This is not trolling my friends, this is valuable information that others should be privy to. Based upon observable instances in his post history. Of course he is free to debunk or refute these  correct and informative posts regarding his prior history here.

Who's up for the nutildah trading tips sheet? any takers?  His own $ value speaks volumes as to the value he can contribute to other members here.


Welcome the smarmacist. We almost forgot about you (because you are kinda irrelevant and always have been). However, you are right. Even you deserve a mention HugeBlackWoman. Don't worry we will not leave you out. Patience you broke down bum. PivX and Nav. Nice entry you timed there you dumb fool.

The pharmacist reads the initial post and says  only 2 have any real drama ??? Yeah because all those other observable instances of financially motivated wrong doing are a brilliant reason to enlist them into positions of trust.  We will soon ask dark_star to offer up your best posts, so we can see why you are given a spot on the most lucrative sig campaign here. He seems to be hiring you on the bases of being a great poster and being honest. We will call him to debate on that soon perhaps. This will be an interesting one.

Are you a great poster and honest too?  HugeBlackWoman? I mean to a level that should ensure YOU get to be one of the very very very select group of sig spammers for the highest pay rates? Because we can not find even 1 original thought inspiring post that you have made that stands up to close scrutiny. You seem to just find threads and then just find your own way to agree or disagree with what someone else has already said. Totally worthless contributions.

Perhaps campaign managers need to be examined next.  Looks like the entire sig campaign arena is one big gamed and manipulated club and does not seek to find the very best posters and most honest members at all does it?

These trolling false accusations are great though for motivation.

Anyway patience patience my dear Dirty Turds, Demonic Traitors, Devious Twats, (feel free to put forward your own appropriate D and T words) you will all get you place in the initial post.

Look at suchmoron, practically pleading for her own place up there in shining lights. Haha, okay fatty hold on tight. Why not try to debunk some of those observable instances rather that screaming your other meaningless garbage and false accusations . Get on with it, we like destroying you in public. SAVE SOME VOTES FOR SUCHMOON that greedy slob needs some love too.







Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: LTU_btc on July 31, 2019, 04:27:40 PM
Shit, here we go again. I haven't seen you very active in recent weeks, but now come back with same bullshit as always. Stop beating dead horse, ypu're not going to achieve anything with this stuff. Oh, sorry, you may become Greatest Troll of Bitcointalk officially if you continue these wars, maybe it's your goal here?


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on July 31, 2019, 04:46:21 PM
Shit, here we go again. I haven't seen you very active in recent weeks, but now come back with same bullshit as always. Stop beating dead horse, ypu're not going to achieve anything with this stuff. Oh, sorry, you may become Greatest Troll of Bitcointalk officially if you continue these wars, maybe it's your goal here?


LTU_btc  seems a little bit confused.


Observable instances of truth = BULLSHIT  LOL

Observable instances of truth = TROLLING hahah

Try again please. Present your refutation of the observable instances not just scream trolling or bullshit.

Makes you look like a troll.

Which observable instance are the ones you are calling bullshit on exactly. Don't be shy. Bring them here. This is just the RIGHT PLACE to debate them.

People on meta are confusing trolling with the truth. Although starting with the same 2 letters, these mean very different things.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: mosprognoz on August 01, 2019, 06:02:04 AM
Lots of predictable replies from the observable dirt bags here. Look you sniveling wretches and bottom feeding ass feltchers like moronpigsnoz ( or whatever your shitty turd world name is that we can't be bothered to waste time on) IT IS VERY SIMPLE... all you have to do is make a successful refutation of the Observable wrong doing and double standards we have presented and we will remove or update them. Take your time, there is no hurry. There is no point screaming TROLLING.. when people can verify these observable instances for themselves. Anyway patience patience my dear Dirty Turds, Demonic Traitors, Devious Twats, (feel free to put forward your own appropriate D and T words) you will all get you place in the initial post.

It seems that you have some kind of paranoia about DT members. Paranoia is one of the symptoms related to Schizophrenia... I strongly advise you to visit your doctor. Because, schizophrenia symptoms can come and go. No one has all of them all of the time. But don't worry,it is treatable. I saw a lot of patients like you, with exactly same ideas and plans. (Fighting demons and saving the world)


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Hueristic on August 01, 2019, 06:52:47 PM
If you happen to be dumb enough NOT to clearly see how this operates then try reading over this thread a few times until it penetrates your skull.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5088852.0

Yeah, so I went back and reread this a few times and damn if i'm just that dumb.



Seems like your new trollthread is working - you're currently leading the troll poll: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5168331.0

Shit, how do I change my vote. :D



Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Hhampuz on August 01, 2019, 08:33:29 PM
I welcome this thread as a stark contrast to the Troll Poll posted recently, obviously I voted for myself since I could not find any rules against it.

May the best dirtiest user win!


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Hueristic on August 01, 2019, 08:51:37 PM
I welcome this thread as a stark contrast to the Troll Poll posted recently, obviously I voted for myself since I could not find any rules against it.

May the best dirtiest user win!

I got your back.

You have 2 now! :)


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Hhampuz on August 01, 2019, 09:02:53 PM
I got your back.

You have 2 now! :)

Wohoo! Up to 3! I'll start writing my thank you speech right away!


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: bones261 on August 01, 2019, 09:32:01 PM
I got your back.

You have 2 now! :)

Wohoo! Up to 3! I'll start writing my thank you speech right away!

Well, it seems that you wanted the title. So I went ahead and voted for you in this poll. I aim to be of service. Hope you "win"  :)


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: LFC_Bitcoin on August 01, 2019, 09:34:57 PM
Here she goes again, who put a dollar in the cunt?


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: DireWolfM14 on August 01, 2019, 09:45:23 PM
Here she goes again, who put a dollar in the cunt?

Congrats to LFC!  Not only did you make CH's poll, you got one of my favorite epithets thrown in for good measure.  Even if you're not up in the polling I'd call that a win.

@CuntyHumper, how many of those 11 votes are from your alts?


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Hueristic on August 01, 2019, 10:11:31 PM
I got your back.

You have 2 now! :)

Wohoo! Up to 3! I'll start writing my thank you speech right away!

You gonna do F.Football this year?

I to Phis as long as it's not PPR I'm in.
2 years watching auto pick win because of ppr just takes the fun out of it for me. :)

I got your back.

You have 2 now! :)

Wohoo! Up to 3! I'll start writing my thank you speech right away!

Well, it seems that you wanted the title. So I went ahead and voted for you in this poll. I aim to be of service. Hope you "win"  :)

Nice, we have a movement!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPx2t7xoF1k&feature=youtu.be&t=927


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: philipma1957 on August 01, 2019, 11:29:36 PM
All this could be stopped be a suspension of signatures.

For all of us. No exceptions.  Would also really lower spam counts and bs posts.

Btw I accept no fees for my signature.

And would say this let’s suspend all signatures for 90 days.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: nutildah on August 02, 2019, 05:14:37 AM
All this could be stopped be a suspension of signatures.

For all of us. No exceptions.  Would also really lower spam counts and bs posts.

Btw I accept no fees for my signature.

And would say this let’s suspend all signatures for 90 days.

Sure, I'm all for it. The suggestion has been brought up several times in the past yet its never been enacted, and I'm pretty sure it never will. It definitely won't slow hypnocunter down though. Even if signatures, merit and the trust system was done away with, they'd still find ways to troll into infinity, and beyond.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: LFC_Bitcoin on August 02, 2019, 05:34:25 AM
All this could be stopped be a suspension of signatures.

For all of us. No exceptions.  Would also really lower spam counts and bs posts.

Btw I accept no fees for my signature.

And would say this let’s suspend all signatures for 90 days.

How is that going to stop this narcissistic bell end? CH doesn’t even post for a signature campaign?


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on August 02, 2019, 06:42:24 AM
All this could be stopped be a suspension of signatures.

For all of us. No exceptions.  Would also really lower spam counts and bs posts.

Btw I accept no fees for my signature.

And would say this let’s suspend all signatures for 90 days.

excellent suggestion

The gaming, manipulation and abuse of the systems of control are CLEARLY motivated by financial reward (via sig campaigns). These gamed metrics are used to ensure the system controllers (controlling merit, and trust) are always PRIME candidates for the highest paying sigs and other revenue streams.

What you think it is 100% coincidence that all the system controllers that hang in meta are the SAME people all wearing the highest paying sigs LOL

Not enough earned merit this month = ok not able to join this high paying sig campaign
Not enough merits total = LOW rank you may earn perhaps but only at a low level
What some FAKE red trust = sorry not able to join this high paying sig campaign

Crushes free speech, eliminates the competition, ensures they are the ones that take the highest paying sig spots.


Do you REALLY believe a broke down bum like Nutildah (the evil scam facilitator) begging for 0.02BTC loans REALLY wants to give up his sig spot where he is now earning that per week  LOLOLOLOLOL

Oh really nutildah well why don't you remove your sig now and set a good example? Are you here as a real enthusiast of the decentralized trustless movement or just to milk as much money out of this board as possible??

What about the pharmacist who states when asked what his best achievement is since joining this board " getting on to a high paying sig campaingn" !!   when asked would you consider removing it he replied " HELL NO".

Lol at these scum bags.

They all club together backing each other and ensuring their abuse and manipulation of the systems of control last as long as possible to guarantee they can milk this board for as much as they can get.

It is all there in black and white.  These scum bags can not even produce 10 good examples of their best original thought inspiring posts for analysis. They all know that some of those they are including on DT (to ensure the gang sticks together) are untrustworthy pieces of dirt who abuse merit, and the trust system, lie , scam etc. They don't give one shit so long as they get to be part of this gang.

Look at LFC_ bitcoins admission of this. He is scared of THEM. He sold bill gator out who spoke up against vod's doxxing of a forum treasurer because he wants to keep in with THEM.  Vod admitted the same previously. He dared not act against lauda or his pals else they would ruin his account. This is just admission the systems of control DO NOT WORK.  If the corruption is only allowed at the top then this is EXACTLY the types of control systems we DO NOT WANT. This is like ANTI SATOSHI like control systems. Merit is the REAL CANCER here. Poorly conceived, poorly implemented garbage that we have sought to build upon as if it were some kind of objective and reliable metric. Pure folly.

They don't even TRY to refute any of the observable instances in the initial post. WHY??? because they can not. Those are independently verifiable events.  They try to call it trolling or cast doubt upon the person presenting the observable instances. This CAN NOT WORK because it does not matter who presents them they are there for ANYONE to verify for themselves.

We are being voted the biggest troll on this board. HOWEVER they can not demonstrate that ANY of the observable instances we have presented are FALSE.

TROLLING = inconvenient TRUTHS regarding their prior wrong doing.

REMOVE SIGS or put pressure on campaign mangers to be FULLY transparent with their selection process not just using their/pals own gamed metrics they control. They must be able to demonstrate that ANY person refused entry has a lower post quality or is a scammer. If not it is simply a corrupt dirty scheme to siphon off the largest revenue streams for themselves whilst preventing fair competition from far superior posters that are not scammers and are FAR MORE trustworthy than themselves once you start looking through their post histories here.  SCAM.

Sigs MUST be removed from META board at a minimum. Sigs should be confined to their appropriate boards. Meta should be sig free.

ANY abusers of the systems of control should face a perm ban on their sigs.

EDIT - LATER ON.  Nutildah....???? where are you nutildah??? are you going to remove your signature as a good example or not?  Perhaps busy somewhere doing evil things or facilitating scams for pay. Perhaps he will return later on.



Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: yogg on August 02, 2019, 11:47:34 AM

They don't even TRY to refute any of the observable instances in the initial post. WHY??? because they can not.


Wait what ?
Is there someone else reading your garbage ??
Wow. They must have missed the last 6 months.  ;D


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: suchmoon on August 02, 2019, 12:08:35 PM
How am I supposed to win this thing if I get added two days later and can't vote for myself anymore?

Totally corrupt and unfair poll. If only there was some hero to fight this injustice with some RaNDom CAPs or something.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: nutildah on August 02, 2019, 12:09:36 PM
I have to say I don't think is fair ch, creating a trolling poll to make sure you win the troll poll. Definitely seems like some sort of manipulation to make sure people are reminded of what a troll you are. You should have just let your victory come naturally instead of taking troll steroids to mar your legacy.

Totally corrupt and unfair poll. If only there was some hero to fight this injustice with some RaNDom CAPs or something.

The secret to fighting injustice is to use a lot of punctuation marks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Foxpup on August 02, 2019, 12:22:45 PM
I still don't make the cut, after all I did? Do my time-travelling, gender-bending, pussy-petting, arse-licking, merit-cycling shenanigans count for nothing? I even baked suchmoon a cake (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4661300.msg48832460#msg48832460), for crying out loud. What more do you want? Do you not love me any more? :'(


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on August 02, 2019, 12:27:55 PM

They don't even TRY to refute any of the observable instances in the initial post. WHY??? because they can not.


Wait what ?
Is there someone else reading your garbage ??
Wow. They must have missed the last 6 months.  ;D

Welcome yogg of bitcointalk untrustworthy supporter of scammers and liars.

Thanks for putting in a celebrity appearance on the dirty turds thread where you are in familiar company.

Now you come to prove a point I have been making since the start.

You pick out a statement that we have made "that nobody is refuting the observable instances in the initial post because they can not".

Then you try to cast doubt upon that statement.

Rather than demonstrating that you can successfully refute the observable instances here and now ( YOU CAN NOT)  you just blather some unsubstantiated low functioning spew about it all being garbage (the most you are capable of) and hope that will discredit our statement. Just call it trolling like the other low functioning DT's do.

Look here you have an opportunity to demonstrate clearly that the observable instances we have presented are incorrect or garbage as you claim.

Now member yogg of bitcointalk you untrustworthy trust abusing supporter of scammers and liars  .... why don't you NOW rise to the challenge and demonstrate the observable instances of wrong doing that you and other Dirty Turds have committed are not true.

Go - here is your opportunity.  We can't wait to drag up the lauda blatant lying, scamming, trust abusing and tmans confession that he gave red trust for a facts based post that revealed clearly his pal is a scammer and liar to try to cover up their past histories. Let's get started when you are ready. We loved the alice and bob phone stealing thread. Bring agent fox poop again so we can hear how when someone steals your phone and you say give it back or I will report you to the police that ...........well let's not spoil the surprise for those that don't know what a criminal and scammer alice is for having her phone stolen from her. LOL

Come yogg the untrustworthy supporter of liars and scammers, trust abuser and imbecile. Let's examine your refutation of the observable instances presented in the initial post.

Bring all the corrupt and moronic dregs from DT we will dispense with you all as a group. Let's flush one huge turd stream.  We're feeling rested and ready for some entertainment.

It's always fun to watch you scum bags squirm and twist when trying to undo what is independently verifiable and undeniable. haha

Be quicker just to hack the forum and rewrite history... actually that would be the only way. Except it could all be backed up externally on other archives...  hmmmm

@nutildah  YOU STILL SEEM TO BE SPAMMING YOUR SIG.  I thought you agreed with removing all sigs?  Please hurry up and set a good example.

We do not wish to win your stupid fake troll poll. We openly challenge all those daring to cast our valuable contributions as trolling to come to a new thread and present themselves. They will not. Further more none of those low functioning dregs would be able to refute ANY Of our central points that we have ever made.

Actually many of those you are trying to present as trolls are excellent posters and far smarter than the vast majority of DT members. What is more you will not find the financially motivated wrong doing or EVIL willful scam facilitating you will find on your own account nutildah or that of many other DT members.

I imagine many of these other "trolls" could issue you the same challenge and you would all fail to demonstrate that they have presented central points that you have successfully debunked.

Trolling = inconvenient truths on meta board.

Nutildah does not EVEN TRY TO REFUTE the information in the initial post regarding his willful EVIL scam facilitating for small amounts of BTC ???? would that not be his primary objective here??? NO NO NO he knows that he can NOT refute what he has done so he just tries to scream trolling as if that makes it all go away or makes it untrue.

What ? not even tips how to reduce a fortune to dust, oh investing legend nutildah LOL . Mind you we didn't exactly have queues of investors lining up to buy you tip sheets :(

The ANTI-MIDAS tip sheet for wanna be bums  - ask theymos if you donate say 0.0000000001 btc  (your net worth) if you can change your username to Anti-midas or notildah.

@agent fox poop - sorry we forgot all about you. Don't worry you will be added on the next update. I can't wait to demonstrate your clear and unfettered highly logical conclusions and statements. No wonder you have limitless merits to chuck around. Who could be better suited to judge the value of posts on this board than you? haha

@suchmoron this is kind of true. We will make your name stand out as it deserves in this context. We will appeal to those that are into this body type, that should get them voting your way.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: LFC_Bitcoin on August 02, 2019, 12:47:24 PM
How am I supposed to win this thing if I get added two days later and can't vote for myself anymore?

Totally corrupt and unfair poll. If only there was some hero to fight this injustice with some RaNDom CAPs or something.

STFU suchmo(r)on.

We cares about fair, I’m trying to win this thing. It’s a marathon not a sprint, I’m coming for you Hhampuz.

;)


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: saraschoudhary on August 02, 2019, 12:58:33 PM
Really saddened to hear about the extortion case. I knew about the merit cycling that goes on the forum and how signature campaign are managed but going as far as extorting people using their real life documents is totally unacceptable. This just goes on to show that people will go to any lengths to just have a few extra dollars and all that bullshit masquerading that they do on the forum (about shit posters, merit abuse, plagiarizing) is just to ensure that look good in the public.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: yogg on August 02, 2019, 01:03:59 PM
~SNIP~

Happy it took you a few hours to write this post.
See ya later o/


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: suchmoon on August 02, 2019, 01:11:12 PM
suchmo(r)on.

It's "SuChmo(r)oN -BBW OPEN TO OFFERS IF WINS" ... whatever that means. Now I really want to win to find out.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: LFC_Bitcoin on August 02, 2019, 01:13:52 PM
suchmo(r)on.

It's "SuChmo(r)oN -BBW OPEN TO OFFERS IF WINS" ... whatever that means. Now I really want to win to find out.

Big, beautiful woman open to offers, how lovely :D


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: LoyceV on August 02, 2019, 01:42:54 PM
How am I supposed to win this thing if I get added two days later and can't vote for myself anymore?
At least you got in, I didn't! Which is weird, as I'm one of the members distrusted by cryptohunter:
Quote
Trust list for: cryptohunter (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=92110) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=92110)  +1 / =3 / -4) (155 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/92110.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/92110.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=cryptohunter)) (created 2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h)
Back to index (http://loyce.club/trust/)

cryptohunter Distrusts:
1. ~qwk (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=24140) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=24140)  +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (30) 1131 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/24140.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/24140.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=qwk))
2. ~Vod (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=30747) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=30747)  +29 / =2 / -1) (DT1! (24) 1273 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/30747.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/30747.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Vod))
3. ~TMAN (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=98986) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=98986)  +26 / =1 / -1) (DT1! (25) 1037 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/98986.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/98986.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=TMAN))
4. ~Lauda (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=101872) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=101872)  +35 / =3 / -1) (DT1! (2) 1096 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/101872.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/101872.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Lauda))
5. ~mOgliE (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=107200) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=107200)  +1 / =0 / -0) (167 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/107200.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/107200.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=mOgliE))
6. ~vizique (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=120837) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=120837)  +28 / =0 / -0) (244 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/120837.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/120837.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=vizique))
7. ~Timelord2067 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=131361) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=131361)  +6 / =1 / -1) (256 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/131361.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/131361.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Timelord2067))
8. ~yogg (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=140827) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=140827)  +26 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (22) 706 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/140827.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/140827.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=yogg))
9. ~TheNewAnon135246 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=153656) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=153656)  +26 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 741 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/153656.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/153656.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=TheNewAnon135246))
10. ~DooMAD (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=175361) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=175361) neutral) (320 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/175361.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/175361.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=DooMAD))
11. ~vit05 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=194811) Banned! (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=194811) neutral) (424 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/194811.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/194811.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=vit05))
12. ~Lesbian Cow (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=206143) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=206143)  +40 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (23) 430 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/206143.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/206143.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Lesbian Cow))
13. ~cryptodevil (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=224980) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=224980)  +9 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 115 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/224980.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/224980.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=cryptodevil))
14. ~suchmoon (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=234771) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=234771)  +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (44) 2725 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/234771.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/234771.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=suchmoon))
15. ~NeuroticFish (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=257071) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=257071) neutral) (254 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/257071.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/257071.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=NeuroticFish))
16. ~owlcatz (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=313016) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=313016)  +40 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (27) 223 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/313016.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/313016.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=owlcatz))
17. ~nutildah (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=317618) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=317618)  +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (13) 972 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/317618.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/317618.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=nutildah))
18. ~tmfp (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=351569) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=351569)  +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 430 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/351569.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/351569.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=tmfp))
19. ~yahoo62278 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=355846) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=355846)  +15 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 588 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/355846.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/355846.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=yahoo62278))
20. ~LFC_Bitcoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=379487) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=379487)  +6 / =0 / -0) (938 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/379487.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/379487.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=LFC_Bitcoin))
21. ~Patatas (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=385855) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=385855) neutral) (104 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/385855.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/385855.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Patatas))
22. ~kken01 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=415400) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=415400) neutral) (9 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/415400.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/415400.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=kken01))
23. ~LoyceV (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=459836) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=459836)  +19 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (49) 3325 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/459836.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/459836.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=LoyceV))
24. ~Jet Cash (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=698159) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=698159)  +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 1201 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/698159.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/698159.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Jet Cash))
25. ~marlboroza (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=787736) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=787736)  +9 / =0 / -0) (1010 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/787736.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/787736.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=marlboroza))
26. ~Lafu (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=805820) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=805820)  +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 609 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/805820.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/805820.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Lafu))
27. ~Hhampuz (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=881377) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=881377)  +59 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (29) 1175 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/881377.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/881377.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Hhampuz))
28. ~xtraelv (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=897509) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=897509)  +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (24) 1195 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/897509.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/897509.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=xtraelv))
29. ~HiDevin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=964397) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=964397) neutral) (26 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/964397.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/964397.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=HiDevin))
30. ~Halab (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1053119) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1053119)  +4 / =0 / -1) (345 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1053119.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/1053119.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Halab))
31. ~o_e_l_e_o (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1188543) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1188543)  +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 2282 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1188543.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/1188543.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=o_e_l_e_o))
32. ~iasenko (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1291828) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1291828)  +4 / =0 / -0) (1130 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1291828.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/1291828.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=iasenko))
33. ~coinlocket$ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1339716) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1339716)  +9 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (25) 1043 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1339716.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/1339716.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=coinlocket$))
34. ~mdayonliner (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1432468) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1432468)  +2 / =3 / -3) (363 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1432468.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/1432468.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=mdayonliner))
35. ~asche (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1580039) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1580039)  +9 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (8) 645 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1580039.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/1580039.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=asche))
36. ~Coolcryptovator (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1980983) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1980983)  +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (17) 747 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1980983.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/1980983.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Coolcryptovator))
37. ~DireWolfM14 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2003859) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2003859)  +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 655 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/2003859.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/2003859.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=DireWolfM14))

Trust list: backscratchers: users agree, they trust or distrust each other.
Trust list: backstabbers: users disagree, one user trust the other, while the other distrust him.

Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5102296.0).
Get your own Trust list in BBCode at loyce.club/trust (http://loyce.club/trust/).

Let me cycle some Merit in this topic, see if it helps get me added :P And I voted for suchmoon just so I can see the results :)


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: xolxol on August 02, 2019, 02:24:19 PM
Foxup and marlboroza should be in list too,dumbasses like lauda.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: marlboroza on August 02, 2019, 04:07:10 PM
Big, beautiful woman open to offers, how lovely :D
Quote
Suchmoon aka suchmoron.  Not bad BBW open to offers if wins
NBBBW


OP can you update topic with account "cryptohunter", annoying spammer, supporter of scammer rambotnic, master of trolls? And please do something with poll, it seems I can't change my vote.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on August 02, 2019, 05:49:06 PM
Let's recap so far.

Yogg claimed the observable instances in the initial post were garbage .......then RUNS AWAY when challenged to present which of the observable instances is garbage and why.
Sounds like what happens whenever these DT mongrels are challenged on their disgusting trust abuse and supporting scammers and liars into other DT positions.

Foxpoop MORE patience. Besides surely you can see we add you in the future right? the flux capacitor is broken again?

Moronbozo - more lies and retarded blathering. We see NO instances of cryptohunter supporting any scams from any person here. We see only one interaction concerning rambotnic which was the true legends correct and fair assessment of rambotnic's guides he had copied from the net.  Another miner issue where someone trying to help others was treated very badly and bullied by DT members who made FALSE claims about him.

We have also seen NO PROOF that rambotnic scammed any person before that instance or even after that. If you have evidence that rambotnic scammed after that then that is fine make a different thread this is about DT1 DT2 DT3 members.

Also we know you have a serious English  comprehension deficiency but the local rules CLEARLY state this is a thread discussing DT members ONLY. Is cryptohunter on default trust 1 or 2 or 3 ?  No more off topic or will be reported.

Spamming words LOL ... sorry that is too funny.

LoyceV aka robovac - We have not thought to add you to a list of DIRTY TURDS as in being clearly untrustworthy. Our notes say more of a fool that is taken in by scammers rather than an outright supporter of scammers. Perhaps you excluded CH and he simply retaliated. Who can say. We see no attempts to scam or of any financially motivated wrong doing. It seems rather that you feel important due to your inflated bag of merits and didn't like the FACT that he demonstrated clearly the merit system is subjective gamed garbage and is not a reliable metric at all. You have made plenty of false claims regarding trolling and failed to substantiate them. So that is something to watch.

If it will make you happier to be mentioned in the initial post you may be added under the minor annoyances at the bottom like moronbozo although in our personal opinion moronbozo if far worse since he included real scammers and liars on to the DT and also tried to abuse the trust system himself.  So likely you will need to go at the very bottom. However we could put a little top of the range robovac picture next to you so you stand out if you really want. No promises though since we are busy lately.

@saraschoudhary - yes that is just the tip of the iceberg. Read though those threads there is much more to be disgusted by. They are falling from grace rapidly so some are starting to distance themselves from the core group of scum. There is still many gaming this place to their own ends.

@xolxol - I agree both are unsavory scammer supporting idiots although as far as we can tell they are not openly guilty of financially motivated wrong doing personally. We will list them but I don't expect them to win. FOX POOP SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM MERIT SOURCE IMMEDIATELY.  Even pharmacist was embarrassed at the merit shower fox poop rained down on him each second at one point. He gives merit on political grounds most of the time. I mean look at this thread you get merits for post that should be deleted for low quality zero value garbage and posts that are observable correct and undeniable get ZERO merit. The entire merit system is misleading and bogus and the creates echo chambers and group think. It was the worst thing implemented on this forum ever.





Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: actmyname on August 02, 2019, 06:41:25 PM
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I thought Loyce was just about as neutral as I was. I guess Switzerland is a lone country :'(


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: marlboroza on August 02, 2019, 09:58:20 PM
Also we know you have a serious English  comprehension deficiency but the local rules CLEARLY state this is a thread discussing DT members ONLY. Is cryptohunter on default trust 1 or 2 or 3 ?  No more off topic or will be reported.

It is not off topic post. You said:

Without further ado - The DIRTY TURDS or as we know them DT members.
https://i.imgur.com/BUOdxlG.png
I think cryptohunter is dirty turd therefore her account has to be included into this poll.

And you also said:
Local rules - this is a discussion regarding the observable instances of DT members engaging in clearly negative and untrustworthy behaviors only. Those on default trust DT1 DT2 DT3 may be discussed and nobody else.
So, as far as I can see poll is for dirty turds AKA DT and discussion is for "DT1 DT2 DT3...".

Default trust =/= dirty turd.

I have to recheck your default trust status but I think you are breaking your local rules again, so I will maybe report you to moderator.

Here:
Moronbozo - known to his pals as malboroza or some stupid name.
Quote
Those on default trust DT1 DT2 DT3 may be discussed and nobody else.
You broke your own rule.


Update:
I checked your DT status http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/92110.html and you are not on default trust DT1 DT2 DT3 so local rule applies, you are not allowed to discuss about yourself.
Add account cryptohunter to Dirty Turds aka DT poll of yours without further discussion.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on August 03, 2019, 11:22:21 AM
@moronbozo

Your post as usual is rather confusing.  Please post it again more clearly. Keep in mind whilst you do so that your wants, hopes, dreams and demands mean absolutely nothing to us.  This is not a poll where observable dirty turds get to make groundless accusations against other members that are not on DT1 -DT3 and request the ridiculous notion of adding them to that festering heap.

We are unable to engage in discussion regarding any member outside of the  DT1 -DT3 (pool)

The only thing we concluded that you may be trying to convey is that you are not DT1 DT2 or DT3 

Is that what you are trying to say?

Would it be possible that you could get someone more capable to assist you with your posts in future?`

Is this all because you are upset not to be part of the POLL? you feel left out and dejected since your pals lauda, tman and owlcatz are there? Okay Okay have it your way. We considered your Borderline but perhaps you are right.
 










Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Hhampuz on August 03, 2019, 11:35:47 AM
I decided to offer some backroom deals for signature campaigns in exchange for a vote on this poll! Let's hope nobody finds out because so far it seem to be working :).


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: LFC_Bitcoin on August 03, 2019, 12:23:44 PM
I decided to offer some backroom deals for signature campaigns in exchange for a vote on this poll! Let's hope nobody finds out because so far it seem to be working :).

I’m not accepting this!
I’m going to start a flag against you as soon as I get home. This isn’t fair, I want to be flushed first.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: BitcoinGirl.Club on August 03, 2019, 01:27:51 PM

I think cryptohunter is dirty turd therefore her account has to be included into this poll.
Her?
How did you verify the sex 😜

By the way, seems like an elite group of people up there. How do one get in the group? I mean do I need KFC KYC @The-One-Above-All 🤪


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: marlboroza on August 03, 2019, 10:52:16 PM
~
Who is account malboroza? I can't find them using "search members" button.
Please add dirty turd aka DT cryptohunter to poll. Thanks!

Her?
How did you verify the sex
She said she is female (reputation section, page 18, post #39, hint: rambotnic).

I decided to offer some backroom deals for signature campaigns in exchange for a vote on this poll! Let's hope nobody finds out because so far it seem to be working :).
Heey! I voted for free! It is not fair!  :(


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Foxpup on August 04, 2019, 05:39:04 AM
She said she is female (reputation section, page 18, post #39, hint: rambotnic).
C******unter says that about everyone. That proves nothing.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: mosprognoz on August 04, 2019, 05:45:44 AM
Is this all because you are upset not to be part of the POLL?

Did you visit your doctor as I recommended you? Because it seems that your disease (Schizophrenia) progresses. I found many symptoms and the main one is that, you have some kind of delusions. You believe things that aren't true, even when others show you proof that explain why your beliefs are wrong. Delusion is one or the main symptoms of Schizophrenia and as I said before, I saw a lot of patients like you with same symptoms. Also I can see that you have some thought disorders. You have trouble organizing your thoughts, and your posts are hard for others to understand. Thought disorder is a symptom of schizophrenia too. Dude, believe me, go and visit your doctor, because otherwise you might end up in a mental institute very soon.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: BitcoinGirl.Club on August 04, 2019, 06:37:17 AM
Imagine The-One-Above-All, game-protect, and realr0ach are having a drink together.

May be someone can make a meme about it?

She said she is female (reputation section, page 18, post #39, hint: rambotnic).

Okay I trust you. Not bothered to find the origin 🤪


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: LoyceMobile on August 04, 2019, 06:58:14 AM
We are unable to engage in discussion regarding any member outside of the  DT1 -DT3 (pool)
Whoot I'm in :D

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I thought Loyce was just about as neutral as I was. I guess Switzerland is a lone country :'(
Ch hates me for earning Merit. Even Switzerland cannot protect me from that.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TheNewAnon135246 on August 04, 2019, 08:22:03 AM
@The-Pajeet-Above-All, when are you going to start posting from your main account again?


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: xtraelv on August 04, 2019, 08:22:27 AM
I feel like such a loser. I didn't even get a dishonorable mention.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TheNewAnon135246 on August 04, 2019, 08:25:29 AM
I feel like such a loser. I didn't even get a dishonorable mention.

You are Lauda's pet, which can be proven by observable instances.

Feel better now?


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: marlboroza on August 04, 2019, 03:50:56 PM
C******unter says that about everyone. That proves nothing.
She (cryptohunter, the-one-above-all (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5138419.0)) posted (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5063753.msg47657270#msg47657270) "Im female btw" so I will have to take that as enough proof.

Lets check opinions and exclude accounts from poll who don't fit into following criteria:
1. They all cycle merit to each other
2. They all vote to include each other on DT (via their foolishly given right to be the ones to decide on WHOM is eligible for DT)
3. They all seem to be creaming off the best paying (in btc) sig spots via their pals who are campaign managers.
4. The central cluster of Dirty Turds also seem to exclude the same people from dt.
5. They will use the "TRUST" system to punish whistle blowing of their prior observable wrong doing.

Tman - included dooglus (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3420) to trust list, nutildah excluded dooglus (4)
Nutildah never sent merit to Owlcatz's post, never received merit from Owlcatz (1)   
Lauda - blank trust list (2)
Vod - not in signature campaign (3)
Yogg    -never sent merit to LFC_Bitcoin's post, never received merit from LFC_Bitcoin
Hhampuz - blank list of excluded users (4)
LFC_Bitcoin - never sent merit to Yogg's post, never received merit from yogg (1)
The pharmacist - as much as cryptohunter lies bad things about TP, he never "punished" her (5)
SuChmo(r)oN - not in signature campaign (3)
Owlcatz - not in signature campaign (3) , no merit transaction between owlcatz and nutildah (1)
Malboroza - blank trust list (2) [1]
(this is quickest observation)

Nothing to vote here.

[1]I am guessing who is account Malboroza


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: suchmoon on August 04, 2019, 04:07:32 PM
"Im female btw"

"with balls" though, or at least some serious mommy/daddy issues:

If you want I will tell you some great detailed experiences from my illustrious past here and you can close your eyes and imagine for a short time what it would be like to be .........a real scam fighter with balls. I warn you though it is no place for snitchy bitches that's mans work. None of this sneaky red trusting behind their back and telling tales on 2 bit start outs that have no support and no hope of going anywhere whack a mole junk, or some poor honest member COPY AND PASTING OOOOOOHHHHH NOOOOOOO some helpful article or evidence of scam or mining guide to help people. What a snitchy little twerp.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Astargath on August 04, 2019, 06:21:18 PM
"Im female btw"

"with balls" though, or at least some serious mommy/daddy issues:

If you want I will tell you some great detailed experiences from my illustrious past here and you can close your eyes and imagine for a short time what it would be like to be .........a real scam fighter with balls. I warn you though it is no place for snitchy bitches that's mans work. None of this sneaky red trusting behind their back and telling tales on 2 bit start outs that have no support and no hope of going anywhere whack a mole junk, or some poor honest member COPY AND PASTING OOOOOOHHHHH NOOOOOOO some helpful article or evidence of scam or mining guide to help people. What a snitchy little twerp.

All girls on the internet are a lie. I honestly doubt she is a she, females aren't usually crazy enough to spend their time trolling. I'm making a game based on cryptos and Bitcointalk, should I include some of the infamous trolls here? I will include Notbatman for sure.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: marlboroza on August 04, 2019, 08:54:39 PM
"with balls"
It's like Xena warrior - she has "big balls", fighting monsters and things...Also, that post can be interpreted in many ways.

All girls on the internet are a lie. I honestly doubt she is a she, females aren't usually crazy enough to spend their time trolling.
That is not quite true, may I recommend you to read few articles:
https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/why-women-troll-women-online-129559/
https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/reports/news/a43626/women-half-online-trolls/
http://thedailychrenk.com/2017/03/20/beware-female-trolls/

To be honest I find this amusing:
Is this all because you are upset not to be part of the POLL? you feel left out and dejected since your pals lauda, tman and owlcatz are there? Okay Okay have it your way. We considered your Borderline but perhaps you are right.
Makes crazy assumption, asks question based on that assumption, makes another crazy assumption then she answers her own question. How crazy you have to be to do that?


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on August 04, 2019, 10:24:18 PM
"with balls"
It's like Xena warrior - she has "big balls", fighting monsters and things...Also, that post can be interpreted in many ways.

All girls on the internet are a lie. I honestly doubt she is a she, females aren't usually crazy enough to spend their time trolling.
That is not quite true, may I recommend you to read few articles:
https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/why-women-troll-women-online-129559/
https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/reports/news/a43626/women-half-online-trolls/
http://thedailychrenk.com/2017/03/20/beware-female-trolls/

To be honest I find this amusing:
Is this all because you are upset not to be part of the POLL? you feel left out and dejected since your pals lauda, tman and owlcatz are there? Okay Okay have it your way. We considered your Borderline but perhaps you are right.
Makes crazy assumption, asks question based on that assumption, makes another crazy assumption then she answers her own question. How crazy you have to be to do that?

WOW moronbozo really came to life since we added him to the poll. This poor little miscreant can't contribute enough to bumping our valuable thread since we made him famous.

Oh yeah he was not grumpy because he was not added to the poll before and only putting minimal effort into this thread. Sorry that was just an assumption we made based on the general prior behaviors of this pathetic low functioning turd world dreg. Like when he cries and throws tantrums when things don't go his way demanding to be taken off DT etc.

He is also a lot of fun though so we try to be nice.

He is very helpful too. He's now going to pull up the top 20 fans and recipients merit for all people mentioned in the initial post and show you how they do not cycle merit around to each other . He is now going to pull up all the includes of all of those in the initial post and show how do not include one another, he's going to pull up all those that exclude OG, TS, QS that are in the initial post. He is going to list all those in the initial post that are NOT spamming highly paid in BTC sigs. The vast majority are.

LOL like you and lauda had a blank trust list for months on end until you left DT.

Get on with it monkey. You want to clearly demonstrate that there is no collusion manipulation and back slapping don't you?

EVEN BETTER  - present the LIES that we or CH have told about TP. This will be our favorite one.

Come on moronbozo do that one first since you will take less time to demonstrate you are full of shit as always you poor demented turd world monkey.

Got to still laugh here that NO ONE HAS DEBUNKED or even TRIED TO REFUTE the observable instances of wrong doing.

Moronbozo are you related to Moronpigsnoz? is this your twin demented brother or the other head attached to your dweeb body?  He is unable to see that he can NOT just claim that independently verifiable observable instances are figments of our imagination.  

We appreciate the activity on this thread but really can you add some substance to your posts. I know you enjoy spouting shit everywhere and meriting each other for that garbage but try to present something with some real value. Something that really turns this around and converts DIRTY TURDS into members that should be on DEFAULT TRUST. You need to debunk or disprove those observable instances.

Since moronbozo is on hyper helpful mode since we allowed his dumb ass onto the poll. If you you moronbozo can present the LIES either we or the true legend that was/is and will always forever be CRYPTOHUNTER has told about HugeBlackWoman/The Smarmacist/The pharmacist then we will move your own description to the major DIRTY TURDS list near the top of the initial post and you will not be left languishing near the bottom. We will even put you above The smarmacist his sneaky self serving sig spamming slimy slippery,  self.

We are shocked how DIRTY and untrustworthy people consider moronbozo to be. He has more votes than quite a few others that have been on the poll way longer than him.  I wonder why people consider you so DIRTY and untrustworthy marlborozo ? you little turd.

Did some other fortunejack spammer turn up to help ? thenewnobody12344532 or something like that?  sorry mr fortunejack spammer who joined around the same time as lauda and tman your other fortunejack spamming pals , We simply don't have the time to respond to all the nobodies that have been here years and achieved a big fat ZERO.
Also have no time for gambling sig spammers who support scammers and liars.





Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Quickseller on August 04, 2019, 11:03:08 PM
C******unter says that about everyone. That proves nothing.
She (cryptohunter, the-one-above-all (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5138419.0)) posted (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5063753.msg47657270#msg47657270) "Im female btw" so I will have to take that as enough proof.

Lets check opinions and exclude accounts from poll who don't fit into following criteria:
1. They all cycle merit to each other
2. They all vote to include each other on DT (via their foolishly given right to be the ones to decide on WHOM is eligible for DT)
3. They all seem to be creaming off the best paying (in btc) sig spots via their pals who are campaign managers.
4. The central cluster of Dirty Turds also seem to exclude the same people from dt.
5. They will use the "TRUST" system to punish whistle blowing of their prior observable wrong doing.

[...]
Owlcatz - not in signature campaign (3) , no merit transaction between owlcatz and nutildah (1)

I have no idea if this is going on or not, but it is possible to send merit from a --> b --> c --> d --> a

I believe this is what the post you quoted is referring to, or something very similar to the above.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: marlboroza on August 04, 2019, 11:23:40 PM
~
I have no clue who is moronbozo so I can't speak in their name but I have to admit that I noticed what you did and it is priceless!

Before:
Moronbozo - known to his pals as malboroza or some stupid name.
After:
Moronbozo - known to his pals as marlboroza or some stupid name.

I made cryptohunter to edit topic and poll  :)


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: ChemicalSpillage on August 05, 2019, 12:12:12 AM
I have no idea if this is going on or not, but it is possible to send merit from a --> b --> c --> d --> a

I believe this is what the post you quoted is referring to, or something very similar to the above.
4 degrees of separation will connect a huge number of false positives if we're going to accept that kind of merit transaction.

You could say this about almost any member that's sent and received a substantial amount of merit (i.e. users on the list)


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Quickseller on August 05, 2019, 12:27:09 AM
I have no idea if this is going on or not, but it is possible to send merit from a --> b --> c --> d --> a

I believe this is what the post you quoted is referring to, or something very similar to the above.
4 degrees of separation will connect a huge number of false positives if we're going to accept that kind of merit transaction.

You could say this about almost any member that's sent and received a substantial amount of merit (i.e. users on the list)
I haven’t done any kind of research on this, so I don’t know if there is any credence to the OPs claim.

There are actually only three degrees of separation in my example. You could perhaps filter out cases in which only small amounts of merit is received from a person via three degrees of separation. 


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on August 05, 2019, 12:39:19 AM
~
I have no clue who is moronbozo so I can't speak in their name but I have to admit that I noticed what you did and it is priceless!

Before:
Moronbozo - known to his pals as malboroza or some stupid name.
After:
Moronbozo - known to his pals as marlboroza or some stupid name.

I made cryptohunter to edit topic and poll  :)

See how little things make him so proud, these poor cretins just need a small piece of kindness from what they believe is a true legend and they practically shine. He made US change 1 letter he has a fucking orgasm. Look at that big smiley face after taking the time and effort to produce both quote with different time stamps. This guy is dynamite with a bit of consideration and recognition from his IDOLS.

We wouldn't want to be his GF (well who would) when he also spots we added MOSTLY because of course there are the odd exceptions to those broadly correct statements in the initial post. He will go off like a fountain, get LFC (his current GF substitute) there ready to mop up and guzzle that down.

Like if you  were to say ....ALL people on meta were subhuman untrustworthy self serving greedy scum. Then of course someone annoying would have to pipe up with well now now that is not entirely true...what about cryptohunter the true legend? and mention all of his selfless great deeds that are all fully verifiable and observable, or his friend the one above all  ? he is also fighting for a fair and transparent system that ensures all members are treated equally. Then once again we would have to say: yeah yeah okay look that is obvious there will be a small exception now and then but not worthy of worrying about since most people are smart enough to derive the MAIN point we are  trying to convey anyway. We are not building a swiss watch here are we?? MOSTLY ALL THEN but we expect people to realize this is a statement that is broadly true. Then again that is a terrible analogy because each person in the initial post is guilty of some seriously net negative and untrustworthy behaviors and there is nothing observably untrustworthy or net negative about CH or ourselves.

If people are so retarded they can not see the clear point we are making and expect to see a PERFECT correlation with the most PERFECT example of total and utter collusion possible then that is their loss. Let's wait for the top 20 fans and recipients of the dirty turds. Then look at the inclusions. Then we will look at those central core that exclude CERTAIN members in the pool. Then we can examine the sig spammers of the top paying (in btc) campaigns that are dts.

The hilarity of moronbozo saying

vod does not have a sig, but does not say well vod did not abuse trust, did not dox a forum treasurer, did not support known scammers and liars on to DT, did not admit he is scared of the central gang so just become their bitch, does not cycle merit to quite a few of them on that list, does not exclude some key members that many dirty turds exclude. He then says, look nothing to vote on, not dirty at all. haha... that is brilliant moronbozo, you pointed out that YES they are NOT ALL guilty OF ALL things.

 Anyway we said we would adjust if people said it was required, as honest and trustworthy members we went ahead and did so.

Cryptohunter is as far as we know still on his very long and expensive vacation so we hope that your joy, excitement and sense of achievement is not marred by this revelation but we alone changed that single letter you moronbozo had without doubt influenced us to alter for the sake of the entire board. We decided that other members deserved to be made aware of your real member name so that they may exercise extreme caution. Sorry we got it wrong previously, but really it is such a crap name who cares and most would know exactly to WHOM we were referring by the dirty description and company you keep, even if you only just worked it out your good self. This makes it no less of an achievement and you should still be very proud of your greatest achievement yet on this board. We will not longer tolerate anyone saying you have achieved nothing at all since being a member here. Please also archive those alterations and this post for your future authenticity.

By the way where  are the top 20 fans and recipients merit lists for those in the initial post ?? there is no cycling or collusion we will not see all of these names all over each others lists will we. Bpip only shows top 10 fans/recipients let's see the top 20 ffs. Where is the nice little pictures that we use to show merit farms/abuse/collusion with all those connecting lines. Let's do it for Dirty turds I bet that would make a pretty little picture too.. LOL why is nobody eager to make these pics or bring a nice bunch of comparison tables we wonder??

Let's have a look through them and see what it looks like. I mean if there is no cycling/collluding I very much doubt we will see the same names all over each others trust lists. There are 100's of 1000's of members are there not if not millions.

Come on moronbozo please be more helpful ... what if we put you with your pal lauda on the list?  we may push nutildah down a few spots so you can be spit roasted by Tman and Lauda. We know that is something you regularly fantasize about getting right between those 2 after a few of laudas vitamin pills? let's make it real. We together can make it happen. We may even change another single letter or something like that.

Come on ROBOVAC if you beat out moronbozo by bringing the top 20 fans and recipients of those in the initial post including minor dregs there.... YOU ROBOVAC will go on the initial post with a picture of any robovac (has to be a real one that average people use to suck dirt from their floors) of your finding so long as you supply the link to the image and promise never to change that image after we post it up. Must be small too and meet our approval.

They the top 20 lists  must be laid out nicely for a good comparison. Even better if they show % of total merit received on there.

As we expected on meta: Hhampuz's back room sig deals offers are beating out suchmoons BBW experience weekend offers. This is a sick world we live in do we have no red blooded beast wrestlers here ffs. Both look vulnerable though at this point to a big upswing on moronbozo's vote.

We heard but not yet confirmed LFC (some just calling him/her THE GUZZLER now ) is thinking of doing another Bukkake event with free entry and fluffers to all those that swing a vote his way. Vod is down for some fluffing if you're not too over-the-hill (have pubes). This is not confirmed so hold those votes until we update.

Remember please NO DISCUSSION of those that are not on DT1 DT2 or DT3 you can't just start throwing votes and btc dust around and expect normal members to do things like that.






Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Foxpup on August 05, 2019, 05:28:41 AM
Agent foxpoop aka foxpup. - details to come. save you votes.
It's about time. But if you're not going to give people a reason to vote for me, then I will: 💓🦊💓 FREE TAILJOBS! 💓🦊💓 What's a tailjob, you ask? Vote for me to find out! (Or watch the truckstop scene in Spaceballs. ;))


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: nutildah on August 05, 2019, 09:36:31 AM
Cryptohunter is as far as we know still on his very long and expensive vacation

Being committed to a mental asylum might seem like a long vacation to you, but don't forget us taxpayers have to shoulder the expenses. I fear the doctors haven't made much progress with your multiple personality disorder, but at least you've regained internet privileges.

I found Foxpup's new restaurant and took a picture of it.

https://i.imgur.com/zHV52FU.jpg

She may need to design a new avatar to promote it, its worth it as the food is quite delicious. I especially enjoyed the 2 merit discount. You pay 2 merits, get 20% off your bill, and one merit gets cycled back to you.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: marlboroza on August 05, 2019, 10:58:32 AM
YES they are NOT ALL guilty OF ALL things.
I am sorry but you said "they all" and I proved you that "they all" is not true and you just confirmed that your statement is not true.

Can you update poll with dirty turd spammer and liar cryptohunter, supporter of scammer rambotnic, person whose advice and voice you should not listen (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5108175.msg49676666#msg49676666) and supporter (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5138319.msg50858886#msg50858886) of scumbag olcaytu2015

I have no idea if this is going on or not, but it is possible to send merit from a --> b --> c --> d --> a
That would definitively make you part of circle (a --> b --> c --> a) You (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Quickseller)(b) have received 75 merits from suchmoon(a), you(b) have sent 13 merits to mikeywith(c) and mikeywith (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=mikeywith)(c) has sent 57 merits to suchmoon(a).

Or, you have received 56 merits from loyceV and passed 23 merits to eddie13, eddie13 has sent 12 merits to DireWolfM14 (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=eddie13) and DireWolfM14 has sent 17 to loyceV.

Are you part of merit cycle circle/whatever or it does not exist?


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: LFC_Bitcoin on August 05, 2019, 11:13:24 AM
We heard but not yet confirmed LFC (some just calling him/her THE GUZZLER now ) is thinking of doing another Bukkake event with free entry and fluffers to all those that swing a vote his way. Vod is down for some fluffing if you're not too over-the-hill (have pubes). This is not confirmed so hold those votes until we update.

My rates -

Facial - 5 Merits
Raw Dog penetration - Include me in your trust list
Cream Pie - 20 Merit’s & inclusion in trust list

Open to extras, PM for details.

The event will be screened live on bitcointalk.org via a stream - Payment to watch is 1 Merit.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: LoyceV on August 05, 2019, 11:44:59 AM
My rates -

Facial - 5 Merits
Let's see:
Quote
Merit received by LFC_Bitcoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=379487) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/379487.html)) from January 24, 2018 until August 02, 2019 (source (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/379487.html))

Sat Jun 15 22:29:29 2019: 5 from Globb0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=244243) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/244243.html)) (history (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/244243.html)) for Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg51479725#msg51479725)
Mon Feb 11 16:30:26 2019: 5 from Jet Cash (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=698159) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/698159.html)) (history (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/698159.html)) for Re: Announcing the 🦊 Vulpine Order of Merit 🦊 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4661300.msg49692389#msg49692389)

Raw Dog penetration - Include me in your trust list
Quote
Trust list for: LFC_Bitcoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=379487) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=379487)  +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (10) 953 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/379487.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h/379487.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=LFC_Bitcoin)) (created 2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h)
Back to index (http://loyce.club/trust/)

LFC_Bitcoin is Trusted by:
1. kingcolex (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=66060) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=66060)  +7 / =0 / -0) (205 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/66060.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h/66060.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=kingcolex))
2. bitserve (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=87930) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=87930)  +1 / =0 / -0) (515 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/87930.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h/87930.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=bitserve))
3. TMAN (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=98986) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=98986)  +25 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (24) 1039 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/98986.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h/98986.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=TMAN))
4. Searing (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=99165) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=99165)  +3 / =0 / -0) (157 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/99165.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h/99165.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Searing))
5. jeremypwr (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=137185) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=137185)  +9 / =1 / -3) (194 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/137185.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h/137185.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=jeremypwr))
6. mindrust (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=176777) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=176777) neutral) (DT1! (2) 479 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/176777.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h/176777.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=mindrust))
7. Globb0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=244243) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=244243)  +1 / =0 / -0) (389 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/244243.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h/244243.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Globb0))
8. JayJuanGee (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=252510) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=252510)  +2 / =0 / -0) (897 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/252510.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h/252510.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=JayJuanGee))
9. coldfusion (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=301691) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=301691) neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h/301691.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=coldfusion))
10. owlcatz (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=313016) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=313016)  +38 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (25) 223 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/313016.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h/313016.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=owlcatz))
11. nutildah (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=317618) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=317618)  +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 1036 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/317618.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h/317618.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=nutildah))
12. Joca97 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=325028) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=325028)  +2 / =0 / -0) (5 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/325028.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h/325028.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Joca97))
13. Fakhoury (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=357170) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=357170)  +4 / =0 / -3) (23 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/357170.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h/357170.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Fakhoury))
14. Royse777 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=366632) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=366632)  +1 / =0 / -0) (280 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/366632.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h/366632.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Royse777))
15. SyGambler (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=405889) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=405889)  +3 / =0 / -0) (277 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/405889.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h/405889.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=SyGambler))
16. bones261 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=452769) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=452769)  +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 671 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/452769.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h/452769.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=bones261))
17. Last of the V8s (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=479624) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=479624)  +4 / =0 / -1) (1749 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/479624.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h/479624.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Last of the V8s))
18. DeathAngel (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=554812) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=554812) neutral) (109 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/554812.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h/554812.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=DeathAngel))
19. bob123 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=579628) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=579628)  +1 / =1 / -0) (1073 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/579628.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h/579628.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=bob123))
20. eddie13 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=580327) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=580327)  +2 / =1 / -0) (450 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/580327.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h/580327.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=eddie13))
21. Pamoldar (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=662330) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=662330)  +1 / =0 / -0) (301 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/662330.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h/662330.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Pamoldar))
22. Hhampuz (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=881377) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=881377)  +61 / =2 / -0) (1178 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/881377.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h/881377.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Hhampuz))
23. buwaytress (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=901859) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=901859)  +4 / =0 / -0) (424 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/901859.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h/901859.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=buwaytress))
24. Csmiami (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=903175) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=903175) neutral) (49 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/903175.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h/903175.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Csmiami))
25. JollyGood (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1016855) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1016855)  +2 / =0 / -0) (73 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1016855.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h/1016855.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=JollyGood))
26. CryptopreneurBrainboss (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1052091) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1052091)  +1 / =0 / -0) (678 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1052091.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h/1052091.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=CryptopreneurBrainboss))
27. micgoossens (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1067333) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1067333)  +17 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2297 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1067333.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h/1067333.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=micgoossens))
28. kenzawak (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1082600) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1082600)  +2 / =1 / -13) (839 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1082600.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h/1082600.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=kenzawak))
29. Don Pedro Dinero (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1107222) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1107222)  +1 / =0 / -0) (185 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1107222.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h/1107222.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Don Pedro Dinero))
30. o_e_l_e_o (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1188543) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1188543)  +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 2329 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1188543.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h/1188543.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=o_e_l_e_o))
31. asche (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1580039) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1580039)  +8 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (10) 649 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1580039.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h/1580039.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=asche))
32. Kylapoiss (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1803753) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1803753) neutral) (176 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1803753.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h/1803753.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Kylapoiss))
33. fillippone (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1852120) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1852120)  +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 800 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1852120.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h/1852120.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=fillippone))
34. DireWolfM14 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2003859) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2003859)  +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 661 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/2003859.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h/2003859.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=DireWolfM14))
35. twiki (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2460637) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2460637) neutral) (4 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/2460637.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h/2460637.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=twiki))


Cream Pie - 20 Merit’s & inclusion in trust list
No takers (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/379487.html) (yet)!


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: eddie13 on August 05, 2019, 06:46:22 PM
Or, you have received 56 merits from loyceV and passed 23 merits to eddie13, eddie13 has sent 12 merits to DireWolfM14 (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=eddie13) and DireWolfM14 has sent 17 to loyceV.

Are you part of merit cycle circle/whatever or it does not exist?

busted :(


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: actmyname on August 05, 2019, 07:01:25 PM
I have no idea if this is going on or not, but it is possible to send merit from a --> b --> c --> d --> a

I believe this is what the post you quoted is referring to, or something very similar to the above.
4 degrees of separation will connect a huge number of false positives if we're going to accept that kind of merit transaction.

You could say this about almost any member that's sent and received a substantial amount of merit (i.e. users on the list)
I haven’t done any kind of research on this, so I don’t know if there is any credence to the OPs claim.

There are actually only three degrees of separation in my example. You could perhaps filter out cases in which only small amounts of merit is received from a person via three degrees of separation.
The-One-Above-All sent 1 merit to mikeywith. mikeywith has sent merit to Quickseller, who has also sent merit to The-One-Above-All.

The larger you make the circle and the more unique people you send merit to, the higher the chance is of being implicated in a "merit cycling circle" but of course, correlation is not causation.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: LoyceV on August 05, 2019, 07:13:29 PM
It's almost as if theymos designed Merit to be sent around in a big circle:
You get merit points when someone sends you some for one of your posts. Additionally, when someone sends you merit points, half of those points can be sent by you to other people.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on August 05, 2019, 07:25:52 PM
The reader should note now the reluctance to provide the TOP 20 MERIT FANS AND RECIPIENTS OF THE DIRTY TURDS LISTED IN THE INITIAL POST.

Usually robovac the  would have generated those in around 1.5 seconds (depending on how dirty the particular floor he is cleaning at the time is) BUT STILL nobody here wants to provide these stats for us to examine.

You can guess why that it right???

Because those top 20 fans and recipients lists of these dirty turds (PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THIS THREAD) would be RIDDLED with each other.


I wonder if they will EVER dare to puke those stats on this thread so we can all have a good laugh at how they do not cycle merit between themselves.

They DO NOT WANT YOU TO EASILY COMPARE THOSE LISTS.

@moronbozo

Please take this as a final answer NO to adding anyone to the initial post who is not on DT1 DT2 DT3

Please stop begging and whining to have your idol added.  

If you are unable to understand what we are trying to convey to you here then please ask someone who can help you.

We appreciate you are only trying to help us and you're still pumped from your only notable achievements here but just chill a little and take time, give others a chance.

Now either provide the top 20 fans and recipients lists for the dirty turds in the initial post or await our further instruction before taking up too much more space in this valuable thread.

@Nutildah

Come now ANTI-MIDAS you do not meet the threshold to pay tax when you are begging for 0.02btc loans do you? where the fuck do you live where they tax these type of broke down bums? Do they know you were once a NEM stake holder or something? may be they just don't believe you are such a broke down wretch now.

These kinds of sob stories make good bedtime reading for CH. We will forward this to him. This will make his day.  He probably likes to hear how you are all doing, we heard he can't wait to get back to chat to all his old buddies on bitcointalk. We heard he is often tempted to check in with you all to see how you are doing. Apparently he says it is flattering how you all still think of him daily and even take the time to abuse his trust score whilst he's away.  Especially you notildah the DT and merit source. LOL

@The guzzler

You filthy merit whore!! It's like you don't give one shit about winning the Dirty Turds poll. This for merit, that for merit. You want VOTES not crappy merits.
We have a good mind to remove you and replace you with .... hmmm who would truly be insulting ... hmmm a complete ass licking nobody even more pathetic than LFC himself.  That's a tough one. I know, yes, I have it....How about cabalism13?
We are not fucking joking around. Imagine being replaced by that turd world low functioning dreg ? You may be the undisputed cumguzzler but NOBODY EATS A DIRTY TURDS ASSHOLE  like cabalism13. That animal will clean up the entire DT team after a big night out and a near lethal curry for a single merit.
This is fair warning Guzzler. No more merit begging here or Cabalism13 it is.


IT SEEMS LIKE THEY DO NOT WANT TO PROVIDE THE TOP 20 FANS AND RECIPIENTS OF THE DIRTY TURDS DOES IT NOT???

ask them for any other shitty gamed bunch of turd stats that proves they are super smart and very important high achievers (which it never does because they shrivel away at producing their amazing achievements here) and you can put a plug in the fucking stats puke that is projectile vomited all over meta.

Bunch of disgusting little dirt bags.

I would challenge most of these pieces of shit to produce their 5 best original thought inspiring posts AND a list of their life time achievements on this board.  The vast vast majority would present NOTHING of any substance that would hold up under even MILD scrutiny. NOTHING that made any REAL difference here.

What we can present is a bunch of observable instances of them either scamming , lying, abusing trust or supporting on to DT those that have done. They all employ double standards and punish other members for lesser crimes than they and their PALS on DT are observable guilty of committing. They all cream off the top of the best sig campaigns ??? why exactly most are shit posters and untrustworthy scumbags.

Go pull up loyceV's interactions with cryptohunter in the early days when they first met in the meta cycling/back slapping threads. Cryptohunter pulled him to pieces. LoyceV was blurting out all manner of illogical garbage. He is on this thread claiming (FALSELY) that cryptohunter some how HATES him because he has gained a fat bag of subjective garbage merits. This is obvious bullshit. Look at the early interactions LOYCEV is clearly being hostile to CH first and joining with fellow morons like suchmoon et al in their attacks upon him. Again robovac the dishonest piece of shit tries to say "oh I wonder why ch excluded me"  Perhaps you will find loyceV not only excluded CH first but we found he made a thread claiming CH was a troll and not trustworthy FIRST. The TRUTH OF THE MATTER is that robovac is sitting on a fat bag of merits and did not like the fact CH demonstrated clearly that merit is meaningless , dangerous, garbage. That is the truth else why should robovac get hostile first??

Now we know robovac is a moron capable of low level stats puke analysis perhaps slightly more complex than raw data pulls. That is IT. Any debate we have ever noticed him engage in with CH he got owned. Go read the early meta threads before robovac started crying and saying CH was on ignore. Most of the stats are based upon gamed and low value to meaningless metrics so what's the fucking point of them anyway ??

Actually we challenge ANY person in meta to present a central point of CH or our own that was successfully debunked. Bring it here and let us see it. YET apparently we are trolls? LOL CH was branded a troll immediately he started pointing out merit was subjective garbage. Anyone who points out inconvenient truths will be termed a troll here.

Suchmoon was reduced to a sniveling heap who was resorting to desperate ludicrous statements before totally debunking merit as MEANINGLESS.

The pharmacist as we have said is a laughable post in terms of real value or achievements. The vast majority of high merit holders are NOTHING BURGERS. Total shit posters and low functioning dregs. This is not an opinion this is a verifiable statement of truth.

Go compare to any top tier poster of huge intellect dz, gj higgins, smooth, etc etc etc etc they have fuck all merit and could DESTROY the minds of every person on the initial post. There are a handful of reasonably smart people on DT but even they are mostly devious, scammer supporting scum bags who need to be removed.

Even if you push those smarter dirty turds or their supporters into a corner and force them to accept the truth they will tell you the truth does not interest them and that trust abusing innocent accounts is a GOOD THING because it makes people even more aware of the dangers??? WTF??

META board should be quarantined from the rest of the community it is so putrid.










Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TheNewAnon135246 on August 05, 2019, 07:26:15 PM
Cryptohunter is as far as we know still on his very long and expensive vacation

Being committed to a mental asylum might seem like a long vacation to you, but don't forget us taxpayers have to shoulder the expenses. I fear the doctors haven't made much progress with your multiple personality disorder, but at least you've regained internet privileges.

I found Foxpup's new restaurant and took a picture of it.

https://i.imgur.com/zHV52FU.jpg

She may need to design a new avatar to promote it, its worth it as the food is quite delicious. I especially enjoyed the 2 merit discount. You pay 2 merits, get 20% off your bill, and one merit gets cycled back to you.


CH still logs on to his account often. No idea why he only posts on his The-Pajeet-Above-All account.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: El duderino_ on August 05, 2019, 07:31:30 PM
Not all DT1 are in the list ...... ??

Finish your work dude, and have some clear poll options :P

Nutildah made a proper example with making such a poll, didn't you saw that troll voting poll ?? Thats how this stuff works :D


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: mikeywith on August 05, 2019, 08:14:09 PM
75 merits from suchmoon(a), you(b) have sent 13 merits to mikeywith

Mikeywith is stuck in the middle of the cycle, Mikeywith is a newbie "cycler" , don't be like Mikeywith , be Like Quickseller.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: LFC_Bitcoin on August 05, 2019, 08:19:30 PM
This goes against everything I believe in but fuck, I had to merit that post The-One-Above-All. You can be really, really annoying & troll this place far too much but that post genuinely made me smile. Some of the phrases you used honestly made me laugh.

This thread is becoming quite fun.

Well played Sir, well played.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: suchmoon on August 05, 2019, 09:09:37 PM
75 merits from suchmoon(a), you(b) have sent 13 merits to mikeywith

Mikeywith is stuck in the middle of the cycle, Mikeywith is a newbie "cycler" , don't be like Mikeywith , be Like Quickseller.

I'm pretty sure your cycle is much better than Quicksy's:

https://meem.link/i/a/gfJRv0.jpg
Edited 2020-11-30 to fix a broken image

IT SEEMS LIKE THEY DO NOT WANT TO PROVIDE THE TOP 20

THE DATA IS PUBLICLY AVAILABLE


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: actmyname on August 05, 2019, 09:39:41 PM
owlcatz looking a little lonely there with no vote recognition... :'(

Let's have a look through them and see what it looks like. I mean if there is no cycling/collluding I very much doubt we will see the same names all over each others trust lists. There are 100's of 1000's of members are there not if not millions.
I want to point this out: suchmoon has sent merit to 1183 unique profiles (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=suchmoon). However, usually, the better the post quality, the more merit an individual will accumulate.

It will naturally be a pyramid and not equal across all users. It would be ridiculous so say that forum members are 1:1 in terms of post quality. Go to the Altcoin discussion board and try to find five consecutive posts that are useful. It would surprise me since I've reported consecutive pages on threads.

You also have a nice new metric to look at: Largest Merit Circle (https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=meritcircle)


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: LoyceV on August 05, 2019, 09:49:49 PM
You also have a nice new metric to look at: Largest Merit Circle (https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=meritcircle)
That's not really a circle, it's more of a web: the sum of all unique users you've Merited or who have Merited you. I didn't know OgNasty holds the record of meriting most unique users.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: actmyname on August 05, 2019, 09:51:10 PM
You also have a nice new metric to look at: Largest Merit Circle (https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=meritcircle)
That's not really a circle, it's more of a web: the sum of all unique users you've Merited or who have Merited you. I didn't know OgNasty holds the record of meriting most unique users.
It would be a statistic used for refutations when talking about "merit cycling". Unless we have scores upon scores of accounts in the DT bike club :)

P.S. Just merit a few more people... you can beat Og :)


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: cabalism13 on August 05, 2019, 11:21:49 PM
@The guzzler
We are not fucking joking around.
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn%3AANd9GcQIoCTqneNZSyVxqGMuhrBwjrNpptf_lwpCiZ22UFzsdgAwKm9a

Now, you know... :P



Hey man, @LFC_Bitcoin just voted for you mate, for I wanna take your place as guzzler 😂 (based on what CH is saying, LMAO)


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on August 06, 2019, 12:57:02 AM
owlcatz looking a little lonely there with no vote recognition... :'(

Let's have a look through them and see what it looks like. I mean if there is no cycling/collluding I very much doubt we will see the same names all over each others trust lists. There are 100's of 1000's of members are there not if not millions.
I want to point this out: suchmoon has sent merit to 1183 unique profiles (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=suchmoon). However, usually, the better the post quality, the more merit an individual will accumulate.

It will naturally be a pyramid and not equal across all users. It would be ridiculous so say that forum members are 1:1 in terms of post quality. Go to the Altcoin discussion board and try to find five consecutive posts that are useful. It would surprise me since I've reported consecutive pages on threads.

You also have a nice new metric to look at: Largest Merit Circle (https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=meritcircle)

Can we have the top 20 fans and recipients lists of the Dirty Turds on the initial post. We are certain a picture (or a bunch of lists) is going to speak a 1000 words.



Since there is no objective set of criteria that define the value of a post is it quite amazing that each of the dirty turds have all chosen to determine that each others posts  are indeed so very valuable and that they should also include each other on DT and be part of the same handful of highest paying sig campaigns run by pals who also happen to be part of the dirty turds group (we do NOT say darkstar is  a dirty turd although his sig spot choices are certain a cause for concern and certainly cause for a debate in the future) yahoo2039420 is certainly a part of the dirty turd outer circle we have just not got around to him as yet )

This thread should at this stage be considered considered by the reader.  

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5088852.0

Now it is interesting to observe that the majority of those claiming there is NO collusion and gaming of the merit here (that leads in part to control of the highest paid sig spots) are those ones wearing the highly paid sig spots. This is again quite undeniable.

Whilst we accept that it is ridiculous to claim all posters would be of equal ability to produce posts of REAL VALUE. That is why we would never claim that and nor would any other person here. However it is ludicrous to believe that persons such as Tman et al  are merely a fair and reasonable home for merit based on the value of posts if you will a product of natural selection in a true meritocracy. Rather than the product of perhaps a tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny subset of the entire board that without any definition nor criteria all seem to believe that their small group of pals produce the most valuable output in their personal subjective opinion. They also believe they are ALSO the most trustworthy and all seem to elected on a non transparent basis to enjoy the best paid sig campaigns. No collusion, no gaming nothing to see here. LOL

Not to mention that is clearly observable that most merit, even in this thread is left on political grounds or for net negative garbage that actually prevents or inhibits the optimal outcome in many cases.

As suchmoon correctly blurted out good poster and bad poster are meaningless terms without strict criteria or definition. We agree with that,  it's super low value and also dangerous in many ways.

Nearly every thread that we or our friend CH participated in on meta, our posts were far MORE valuable than any person that was trying to pose faux rebuttals because our central points are still there and they are not debunked at all. Faux rebuttals that are attempted on  political grounds for selfish personal gain are HIGHLY net negative and the lowest value  posts on the board and yet they received a ton of merit on political grounds.

Even posts where you whilstle blow on scammers and their prior scamming and lying are NET POSITIVE or posts calling for the introduction of fair and transparent rules that ensure the fair treatment of all members are some of THE MOST VALUABLE posts and I am sure satoshi would agree, however in such threads those opposing that goal get the most merit in most cases.

Merit is the worst thing ever to be introduced to this board. Building a trust system upon this broken and gamed garbage just played into the Dirty Turds hands completely.

Let's not forget that most people here fall over themselves to produce garbage lists of shitty stats puke at the drop of a hat.

Ask for the top 20 fans and recipients of the dirty turds here and you can't even bribe shits like robovac or moronbozo to produce them even if you promise them things they are begging for. They are shit scared to present them because it will be quite clear that this a tiny subset of the board that are all pals on meta, DT, merit sources and highly paid sig spots that all fit nicely together and entrench each other in power and entrench them in the top paid sig spots.

That is just the direct financial REWARDS of gaming the wide open and vulnerable stupid systems of control, not to mention you can Lie, scam, turn evil, employ double standards and get paid the highest rates for doing so and not get red trust and made a pariah.

Merit is joke, DT is a cancer that now needs complete removal. There is no going from totally corrupt and broken to fair and reasonable decentralized governance. Governments generally go from fair and reasonable and descend over time into corrupt self serving shit. You can't start at corrupt self serving shit pool, and tinker your way back to reasonable and fair.

We built a house on a foundation of decomposing fecal matter (merit), now the cracks in the walls have opened the roaches have poured in and the roof is leaking hard, let's not sit around saying lets rotate the roaches, lets move some bricks around,  let's work out the probability of rain leaking in  sufficiently and washing the roaches out enough that they don't multiply fast enough before the next cloud burst...... let's forget this shit pile and go build a house on a firm and solid foundation?? time spent tinkering and temp fixes are time we can spend designing a nice new house that functions as a house.

@LFC - we try to keep it light hearted as possible  whilst pushing for a transparent and fair set of rules that ensure each member is treated equally.

This largest merit circle on bpip seems to mean ZIP regarding our central point on merit circles here and as far as we can tell. This is large circle is not even a circle at all. You could have a bunch of people that give 1 or 2 merits out to thousands of people and then all plaster a tiny group of pals/alts with very large chunks of merit who all do the same thing. Form a mini powerful merit circle inside a "large circle" of tiny merit crumbs.

Pull up the top 20 fans and recipients of the dirty turds and stop wasting time with this smoke and mirrors garbage.

Actually DO IT FOR THE ENTIRE DT1 including lauda, vod and moronbozo (they have done plenty of merit damage) let's see it you pussies stop hiding it away. Do the nice little picture with all the connected lines. Fuck it do the top 30 that is still a fucking tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny subset of this board. I bet we see LOTS AND LOTS of these DT's all over those other DT's merit lists. CRAMMED FULL.

Please even attempting to validate this merit sham is laughable. Subjective , gamed and dangerous dirt.  That financial incentive to game and the fact it is wide open to gaming. It is almost by its subjective nature impossible to get busted for abuse concerning the content it is given for. It is almost too funny to based trust upon it ... well ONLY giving trust to those that have gamed it the most is BRILLIANT. hahaha

Now please don't waste time pretending there is no colluding and cycling and then being too scared to present the top 20 merit lists when usually you can not contain yourselves from plastering lists everywhere about any convoluted garbage you can dream up to validate your "best posters" , "most trusted" gamed nonsense. It just looks silly.

Now as LFC said the thread was getting far more fun just slagging each other off and vying for ways to ensure you win the dirtiest turd of bitcointalks first months poll ... this is an ongoing poll so your fame will last as long as you are top dog, but to win the first one is a truly historic event. Right now we have greed dominating with hhampuz back-room deals on sig campaigns bringing him out on top. Will he be August 2019 dirtiest turd of bitcointalk? could he hold his title for the rest of the year? well perhaps so, unless we get other sig campaign managers here all offering similar back room  deals. Suchmoons beast wrestling classes don't seem to be tempting those votes away as we were sure they would. We may be up for a bit of that ...holding back our votes for now. Then again will the guzzler invest in one of those massive funnel things to secure every last drop vote?

Meanwhile cannibalism13 is chomping at the bit to offer some back-passage munching you simply will not be able to refuse for a mere vote on this poll. and at least 1 merit. We should have explained before cannibalism13  voted on LFC that he can not take the guzzlers votes on as his own, if the guzzler is switched out :(  that would just be too unfair unless you are going to fill in on the bukkake next friday evening at the fox hole with vod oiled up in his leopard thong and tiara fluffing (but also now vod now says he wants to finish off as well, apparently will only do it if you stare unblinking free of swimming goggles into his bloated sweating mongoloid  face as he unleashes "the wrath"  of vod??. So you will be starting off at zero if you know what is good for you. The ass feasting cannibal though can apparently change his votes later to vote for himself .  

I feel it is a little unkind to leave poor owlcatz there with zero votes all by herself? All of  suchmoon only has 2 votes? are we dealing with a bunch of misogynistic scum or something else? you don't want any suchmoon beast wrestling experience days? you're not interested in what owl can offer (after tman has had at it)?  what's up with you guys? Just give poor old owl one out of mercy ffs. Everyone else has quite a few. Zero votes is no place for a famous extortionist is it on bitcointalk??. Perhaps bones and his alts are behind all of this after all? If you HAD TO bones. I mean there was no other choice.. which are you going to give one to:  suchmoon or owl?














Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: actmyname on August 06, 2019, 01:06:45 AM
Fine. Here's what you want.

https://i.imgur.com/0VHpCwq.png


https://i.imgur.com/gTDeftI.png


https://i.imgur.com/uKFf56O.png


https://i.imgur.com/HRZt3qu.png


https://i.imgur.com/45Sniow.png


https://i.imgur.com/PtNPnZR.png


https://i.imgur.com/70M9eJk.png


https://i.imgur.com/1cCwpgP.png


https://i.imgur.com/jcVIHMB.png


https://i.imgur.com/TRuCLYH.png


https://i.imgur.com/4BJcjIh.png


https://i.imgur.com/OYMvb3Y.png




Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on August 06, 2019, 01:19:05 AM
thanks actmyname. We do NOT want to sound ungrateful but the top 20 will be FAR more useful. These are only the top 10.  I mean there are going to be far more than 10 in the initial post finally? why is bpip only showing the top 10, when you have people with 5k merits surely it is useful to see even the top 30 or more really.

thanks for being the 1st to at least to attempt to offer the data we are requesting be put on display here for people to take a look at.

really we need a stats LOVER who can push all this to some lovely charts and pics for people to make up their own minds. I'm sure a nice chart with it all one will demonstrate clearly that the dirty turds are VERY VERY VERY frequently on each others fans and recipients even with just a top 20.



Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: marlboroza on August 06, 2019, 01:38:30 AM
Seems this cycle is getting bigger each day  :D
Mikeywith is stuck in the middle of the cycle, Mikeywith is a newbie "cycler" , don't be like Mikeywith , be Like Quickseller.
Not at all, it was a -> b -> c -> a randomly picked example from quickseller's merit page. You can probably do a-b-c-a with most merit senders/receivers.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: actmyname on August 06, 2019, 01:45:30 AM
thanks actmyname. We do NOT want to sound ungrateful but the top 20 will be FAR more useful. These are only the top 10.  I mean there are going to be far more than 10 in the initial post finally? why is bpip only showing the top 10, when you have people with 5k merits surely it is useful to see even the top 30 or more really.
Sorry, I don't operate BPIP. Stats are available on Loyce's site if you want to compile them.

really we need a stats LOVER who can push all this to some lovely charts and pics for people to make up their own minds. I'm sure a nice chart with it all one will demonstrate clearly that the dirty turds are VERY VERY VERY frequently on each others fans and recipients even with just a top 20.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Even if a "DT cycler" is in a user's top ten, it doesn't mean it's abuse. After all, suchmoon is the third most merited user on Bitcointalk. They have also received merit from nearly 300 profiles.

And here's the thing: with such high merit counts, most of the users you've listed are bound to be on the top 20 send/receiver lists. 20 is a lot.

Here's the global ranking of users by how much merit they have, filtered to your list.
#    MERIT USERNAME
3.   2778 | suchmoon
7.   2032 | The Pharmacist
14.  1275 | Vod
24.  1131 | Hhampuz
26.  1096 | marlboroza
27.  1090 | Lauda
30.  1068 | nutildah
33.  1038 | TMAN
37.  965  | LFC_Bitcoin
71.  723  | yogg
96.  538  | Foxpup
304. 224  | owlcatz


Makes sense to me why suchmoon, The Pharmacist and Vod would show up as common occurrences on someone's list.



suchmoon also shows up on the following people's merit sent lists ranked by merit received from ranks 1 to 50:

#4  | DdmrDdmr
#5  | o_e_l_e_o
#10 | hilariousetc
#20 | xtraelv
#22 | iasenko
#28 | bob123
#31 | mikeywith
#32 | coinlocket$
#34 | Steamtyme
#45 | TryNinja
#50 | ICOEthics

In comparison, here's the same thing but ranked by merit sent (within 50)

By the way, suchmoon is the top merit sender.

#4  | Foxpup
#5  | bones261
#6  | LoyceV
#10 | Vod
#16 | Welsh
#20 | DdmrDdmr
#29 | The Pharmacist
#33 | o_e_l_e_o
#41 | nutildah
#50 | marlboroza

Reminder, these values are for suchmoon alone and only for the sent merit list. We have not scratched the "received merit" list in which suchmoon can be found in most of the top merit receivers, including those that are not on your poll option list.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Veleor on August 06, 2019, 03:41:46 AM
Does anybody remember how this "DT drama" with cryptohunter (aka The-One-Above-All (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5138319.msg50859238#msg50859238)) started and don't you think that it was being blown out of proportion?

I believe this prolonged story can end when negative feedbacks - which had arisen from a heated debate - will be removed from cryptohunter (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=92110).

If cryptohunter doesn't trust DT members, s/he can just use own Trust list, instead of writing critical essays about DTs throughout the forum. If cryptohunter has any facts against DT members, then let s/he public them in Reputation.

It depends on you, whether you want to continue squabble or finally stop this fight.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: nutildah on August 06, 2019, 04:23:06 AM
Does anybody remember how this "DT drama" with cryptohunter (aka The-One-Above-All (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5138319.msg50859238#msg50859238)) started and don't you think that it was being blown out of proportion?

Blown out of proportion????????????????????????????? ????? ????????????? ?? ? ? ? ??????????????????? ?

No way! Proportion is adequate for the grievous offenses we have committed. We should probably all be drawn and quartered, actually.

I believe this prolonged story can end when negative feedbacks - which had arisen from a heated debate - will be removed from cryptohunter (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=92110).

How can that be when they adamantly reject all suggestions that they are the same people?

It depends on you, whether you want to continue squabble or finally stop this fight.

I find that a bit hard to believe. I think ch toaa will continue to bitch here for the rest of eternity. but thanks anyway for the suggestion. I don't even read what they write anymore. Not only is it too long but its just rehashing the same nothing over and over again.

Now watch as they continue to rehash the same nothing...


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TimeBits on August 06, 2019, 04:26:03 AM
I don`t know but whoever banned my old account for talking about time banking/duration distribution/self voting and the end of bitcoin mining and showing a simulation of it 6 years ago, flush them, Fiat loving fuck.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: xolxol on August 06, 2019, 05:41:30 AM
thanks actmyname. We do NOT want to sound ungrateful but the top 20 will be FAR more useful. These are only the top 10.  I mean there are going to be far more than 10 in the initial post finally? why is bpip only showing the top 10, when you have people with 5k merits surely it is useful to see even the top 30 or more really.
Sorry, I don't operate BPIP. Stats are available on Loyce's site if you want to compile them.

really we need a stats LOVER who can push all this to some lovely charts and pics for people to make up their own minds. I'm sure a nice chart with it all one will demonstrate clearly that the dirty turds are VERY VERY VERY frequently on each others fans and recipients even with just a top 20.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Even if a "DT cycler" is in a user's top ten, it doesn't mean it's abuse. After all, suchmoon is the third most merited user on Bitcointalk. They have also received merit from nearly 300 profiles.

And here's the thing: with such high merit counts, most of the users you've listed are bound to be on the top 20 send/receiver lists. 20 is a lot.

Here's the global ranking of users by how much merit they have, filtered to your list.
#    MERIT USERNAME
3.   2778 | suchmoon
7.   2032 | The Pharmacist
14.  1275 | Vod
24.  1131 | Hhampuz
26.  1096 | marlboroza
27.  1090 | Lauda
30.  1068 | nutildah
33.  1038 | TMAN
37.  965  | LFC_Bitcoin
71.  723  | yogg
96.  538  | Foxpup
304. 224  | owlcatz


Makes sense to me why suchmoon, The Pharmacist and Vod would show up as common occurrences on someone's list.



suchmoon also shows up on the following people's merit sent lists ranked by merit received from ranks 1 to 50:

#4  | DdmrDdmr
#5  | o_e_l_e_o
#10 | hilariousetc
#20 | xtraelv
#22 | iasenko
#28 | bob123
#31 | mikeywith
#32 | coinlocket$
#34 | Steamtyme
#45 | TryNinja
#50 | ICOEthics

In comparison, here's the same thing but ranked by merit sent (within 50)

By the way, suchmoon is the top merit sender.

#4  | Foxpup
#5  | bones261
#6  | LoyceV
#10 | Vod
#16 | Welsh
#20 | DdmrDdmr
#29 | The Pharmacist
#33 | o_e_l_e_o
#41 | nutildah
#50 | marlboroza

Reminder, these values are for suchmoon alone and only for the sent merit list. We have not scratched the "received merit" list in which suchmoon can be found in most of the top merit receivers, including those that are not on your poll option list.
Isnt an abuse,because they are DTs,if you're out from their circle you abused the system and you are a troll if you oppose them.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: LoyceV on August 06, 2019, 06:06:24 AM
Stats are available on Loyce's site if you want to compile them.
Here you go: http://loyce.club/Merit/merit.all.txt
Knock yourself out ch! Try to produce something for a change, instead of just complaining about everyone else. Good luck, this single file has all the information about Merit you ever wanted. Updates on Fridays.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TheNewAnon135246 on August 06, 2019, 07:01:42 AM
I really don't understand the whole 'merit cycle' narrative. Most of the DT members are already Legendary users so getting more merit has no purpose (besides pissing off pajeets like The-Pajeet-Above-All). Are you just salty you will never become a Legendary user because nobody likes you?


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: LoyceV on August 06, 2019, 07:18:41 AM
I really don't understand the whole 'merit cycle' narrative. Most of the DT members are already Legendary users so getting more merit has no purpose
Bragging rights? I don't need Merit at all, and yet, I've checked every single Merit I ever received. It's more or less feedback on my post quality.

Quote
(besides pissing off pajeets like The-Pajeet-Above-All). Are you just salty you will never become a Legendary user
It's cryptohunter (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=92110)'s alt, so he already has a Legendary account.

Quote
because nobody likes you?
This shouldn't have anything to do with Merit. Although ending up on people's ignore list because of thousands of annoying posts doesn't help either :P


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TimeBits on August 06, 2019, 07:35:53 AM
I really don't understand the whole 'merit cycle' narrative. Most of the DT members are already Legendary users so getting more merit has no purpose (besides pissing off pajeets like The-Pajeet-Above-All). Are you just salty you will never become a Legendary user because nobody likes you?

https://i.imgur.com/E3FJeCw.png


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TheNewAnon135246 on August 06, 2019, 07:37:36 AM
I really don't understand the whole 'merit cycle' narrative. Most of the DT members are already Legendary users so getting more merit has no purpose
Bragging rights? I don't need Merit at all, and yet, I've checked every single Merit I ever received. It's more or less feedback on my post quality.

Quote
(besides pissing off pajeets like The-Pajeet-Above-All). Are you just salty you will never become a Legendary user
It's cryptohunter (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=92110)'s alt, so he already has a Legendary account.

Quote
because nobody likes you?
This shouldn't have anything to do with Merit. Although ending up on people's ignore list because of thousands of annoying posts doesn't help either :P

Apparently Cryptohunter is on a very long and expensive holiday (https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/1024/media/images/81738000/jpg/_81738062_risitas.jpg) so The-Pajeet-Above-All can't be his alt account.



Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: suchmoon on August 06, 2019, 12:16:44 PM
I believe this prolonged story can end when negative feedbacks - which had arisen from a heated debate - will be removed from cryptohunter (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=92110).

It's been tested when marlboroza removed his neg trust and it didn't work back then. CH will find always something to bitch about.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on August 06, 2019, 12:18:59 PM
So let's have a quick recap before we take a snooze.

1. LoyceV the rampant stats spewing ROBOVAC refuses to compile a top 20 fans and recipients of DT1 members
2. Everyone else refuses to do so.


WHY? because as actmyname is preparing you to accept - that WHEN or IF you ever viewed those lists they would be CRAMMED FULL with each others names. So there you have it the VAST VAST MAJORITY OF THEIR MERITS is as a result of that tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny subset of the forum believing EACH OTHERS  posts are the most valuable. Even with no single list of set criteria to measure them against. They just all happen to be pals mostly hanging in meta ( a tiny subboard) and all happen to be the best and most valuable posters in EACH OTHERS OPINIONS. Seems legit right?  I mean it does not matter that many will not even offer up 5 of their best original thought inspiring contributions or list their Achievements here, or that many are OBSERVABLY guilty of scamming, lying, double standards, and other untrustworthy behaviors or knowingly supporting them and refusing to even put a warning there to protect others. However many are TOTALLY down for putting a warning on your account IF YOU MENTION THOSE PAST OBSERVABLE INSTANCES OF WRONG DOING.

This is all just a coincidence? of course although they are observably shit posting fools and morons who get made to look foolish under any kind of pressure or scrutiny and a concentrated bunch of untrustworthy scum that will abuse trust to punish whistle blowers their VALUE TO EACH OTHER is clearly apparent.

That is not the end of the very very strange definition  and appraisal of value and trust. I mean on top of that even though they are all acutely aware of the observable instances of wrong doing (LISTED IN THE INITIAL POST)  they still feel that EACH OTHER are also THE MOST TRUSTWORTHY AND SHOULD BE ON DT. Imagine that?? so not only do they think that although they are observably low functioning  they also produce the most valuable posts, they think that although they are guilty of all the observable financially motivated wrong doing in the initial post WHICH IS THERE IN BLACK AND WHITE (ALTHOUGH NUTILDAH SEEMS TO BE BOASTING THAT IS NOTHING ) that makes them the most trustworthy in EACH OTHERS OPINIONS) well you would expect that right? I mean what is wrong with you?  morons who gets destroyed in every debate are the ones who make the most valuable posts YEP THAT MAKES PERFECT SENSE, and those that scam, lie, try to discredit whistle blowers with trust abuse, employ clear double standards  are the ones that are most  trust worthy YEP THAT MAKES PERFECT SENSE ALSO.

Then the ONLY people that have any chance of standing against them due to having grasped enough merit via UNDENIABLY GOOD POSTS over the years, a group of people that on the WHOLE (although none are our cup of tea really since most have criticized the true legend unjustly for his direct and honest approach to scammers, liars and their supporters) present posts that do not fall apart under the slightest scrutiny and seem to be based upon some solid reasoning and logic. Well guess what the most ardent scammers, liars and their supporters ALL SEEM TO believe they should be excluded from the trust system?  Oh really, what a coincidence.

That is almost laughable but wait there is more, these observable bunch of retarded scammers and scam supporters MOST ALL  seem to have creamed off the highest paying (in btc) sig spots. There are a handful of these spots on the board THE BOARD WITH 100,000'S OF ACTIVE  members and yet this SAME HANDFUL OF PEOPLE seem to have creamed of the majority of all of these top paying spots??  what you say, well you would expect to see a bunch of dumbo scammers and liars and their supporters be paid the most to continue posting their political drivel to ensure that there is NEVER A FAIR AND TRANSPARENT SET OF RULES THAT ENSURE EACH MEMBER IS TREATED EQUALLY.  Of course that is exactly what you would expect when systems of control are this poorly thought out and implemented. That is what you would expect anywhere where a small circle of individuals centralize and concentrate power in their own hands. THIS IS THE ANTI SATOSHI systems of control operating under your very noses.

Did theymos do this on purpose. NO. We have started to believe he did not. He does seem to want a fair and transparent board where each member is given a fair chance and treated equally but sadly every time he comes to meta board a listens to people like lauda worm tongue and his bunch of conspiring scum bags he gets pushed to change things for THEIR benefit. The rise of the threshold of merit to 250 cycled merits was RETARDED it concentrated power to a few people that were already abusing the system and favoring each other. The true legend spotted this immediately but was jumped upon by this bunch of scum who tried all that they could to get him banned.

Wake up theymos, you are trying to improve a system built upon a festering heap of racid shit. You are hoping it will become MORE fair and decentralized as it grows. This is not essentially going to happen where they can power up their acolytes and alts with merit allowing only those in such large proportions into system controllers any rotation or other weak sauce attempts will do NOTHING.

Flick the merit requirement down to 100 from 250 and use activity as a far stronger weighting. You can not replace nuked abusing accounts of 1500 activity like you can accounts showered in merit for starting some shit stats or poll or thread. Decouple merit from rank after snr.  These are very simple alterations to REALLY decentralize the power here.

Of course you would expect a group of pals given all the merit to give out on the basis of THEIR OPINIONS of whom deserve it most would have all of merit. I would expect that also. You would also expect those with crumbs or merit to seek favor from those handing out the merits based on their opinions only. This is what you would expect if you don't place some strict definition and criteria for allocating merit. Imagine all merits given to faux rebuttals and bullshit that got debunked were deleted ...that would be kinda useful. Political points would be a better name merit, or perhaps anti-merit?

Nutildah " the observable instances of gross financially motivated wrongdoing and scamming/scammer supporting, double standards  in the initial post = NOTHING "  stop going on about nothing will you please.

This is SO BORING - whenever you demonstrate we are scamming lying scum double standards scum, you keep demonstrating the SAME THING over and over again THAT WE ARE SCAMMING LYING SCUM DOUBLE STANDARDS SCUM.  Please stop presenting the same thing about us. Tell people we are trustworthy and valuable for a change. It is boring to keep hearing the truth about ourselves.

Thenewnobody345234 - I talk like tman, I wear the same sig as Tman and Lauda, I protect Tman and Lauda's trust abuse and scamming and lying, actions, I include Tman and lauda on DT (or did until lauda was removed)  I may not actually be tman or lauda although I joined around the same era too but you should view my posts are unbiased and neutral.

Also I Thenewnobody345234 am as dumb as Tman because I consider a pajeet being above us all (including myself) being some kind insult to the pajeet and not myself. LOL

Get these scumbags out of here. They make the rest of you look worse. We didn't think that was even possible.


@suchmoon WRONG AS USUAL


Hey police that guy just stole my car

suchCOP - STOP BITCHING MOFO that car thief is cool, I know him well.

Hey police there is that same guy selling my car to someone else

suchCOP - ALWAYS BITCHING ABOUT THE SAME THING, leave my car thief pal alone or I may have you arrested.

3rd party by stander? hey suchCOP why not arrest the criminal and get this guy his car back.

SuchCOP - NAH NOT WORTH IT BITCHES GONNA BITCH I know the thief he's cool.  THIS same bitching behavior happened when a different cool friend of mine stole that bitches motorcycle before. There is simply no point listening to his bitching it will never stop right? or do you want to get arrested too?

3rd party bystander - Hmmm



Lauda gave a red scam tag to the true legend because the 2 000 000 000 USD legend (who had previously slayed that scamming piece of shit and his lies many years since past)  said if lauda continued to call him a liar after being asked to present the lie 2x already and would not, then the true legend would encourage others to read laudas post history for themselves to see who was calling who a liar. Lauda said that was blackmail LOLOL and deserving of a scam tag.

That TRUST ABUSE only (we hear) started to come to the true legends attention after the lauda was placed back on DT. That is when we observe the true legends rightful wrath and righteous scathing posts of both the moronic merit system and the moronic decision to convert DT into a cess pool of scammers/scammer supporters and merit cyclers came to pass on the board known as bitcointalk. That was in the first age of bitcoin. In the year of 2018. As foxpup can tell you it never ceased after that point until a fair and transparent system was introduced that treated all members equally.

Many friends of the true legend came and went, taken down by various disgusting miscreants and untrustworthy selfish and greedy scum bags and their unfair power granted by the warden of bitcointalk along his path of experimenting with decentralized control until a viable solution was found. Using gamed metrics and enlisting and corrupting mods along the way with back room deals on the most lucrative sig campaigns. Each time though the friends arose with renewed vigor and stealth. `

Lauda is likely not even the worst since some of its past is not entirely without some merit. It is apparently not entirely satisfying to CH to have had to be SO negative towards Lauda since there has been instances where Lauda has been observed to be both helpful and to a degree repentant. There are likely far worse individuals that have not simply crossed paths with us before.

Having said that regardless of the personal damage a person tries to do you then you should not ignore clear wrongdoing or trust abuse to ANY member. The true legend seemed to have never given 1 shit about merit, trust or any of that contrived bullshit before he was asked to look into a case of what appeared to be bullying of a new member. Also looks to have encountered more trouble by sticking up for legends that seem to have been clearly net positive over the years that were targeted for some complete bullshit copy and paste that was for the GOOD of others and were getting banned. The true legend does not like bullying or small groups of bullies increasing their power via broken systems of control that they are gaining. Suchmoon is a total fucking bully and scumbag and the pharmacist can act like a bully also at times. Crush them down and take away their power. Bullies should never been allowed to grasp power in the first place. The pharmacist was as meek as a lamb when he came here now can turn into a tyrant when he thinks no person is looking.



"whats the point of all this merit, I'm already a legend" well fuck off then and let us cap your merit at 1000. Why not cap all legends at 1000 if there is no advantage to it. How about you loyceV cap it at 1k and all the other DT's?  but then what about

1. your ability to control DT selection
2. your ability to take the best sig spots if they are based on per monthly earned merits of whatever shit the campaign managers are dreaming up to prevent any competition to you guys.
3. your ability to make all these stats all over merit showing you are the most valuable and best posters
4. Your ability to say well my opinion matters more cos look at my higher earned merit score


the worst part is having so much merit to give, this is the carrot of group think and echo chambers , trust abuse is the stick (although theymos fixed it up quite a bit lately but that will not really help if campaign managers are still allowed to use the OLD trust score as an excuse to exclude people from their highly paid sig campaigns)

Anyway back to the fun part of thinking up negative remarks about each other in a semi comedic and childish manner (ours the truth  grounded in observable instances yours bogus and pulled out of your ass).

We are all enjoying it now, seems a shame to ruin the mood with all the UNFAIR AND CORRUPT PAST EVENTS. Let's just enjoy the promos you are all offering.














Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: LoyceV on August 06, 2019, 12:31:12 PM
1. LoyceV the rampant stats spewing ROBOVAC refuses to compile a top 20 fans and recipients of DT1 members
I'm sorry, I didn't know I was required to jump when you say so. I'll make you a deal: get me a clear set of requirements, and I'll get you a quotation. After paying my fee, I'll get you your stats.

And because I expect a very long post and boring post, I require 0.00001BTC per word to be paid upfront just for reading your requirements :D


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TheNewAnon135246 on August 06, 2019, 12:52:43 PM
I consider a pajeet being above us all (including myself) being some kind insult to the pajeet and not myself. LOL


You are the biggest pajeet on Bitcointalk, which is an observable instance. I never said you are above any of us. I have a feeling that's the issue at hand. You're surrounded by successful traders, physical bitcoin collectors and other wealthy people while you're sitting in some shitty shack somewhere in India. Calling yourself (Cryptohunter) wealthy isn't fooling anyone. I understand where the saltyness is coming from but your behaviour is getting boring. I'm considering to put you back on my ignore list.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Foxpup on August 06, 2019, 01:06:25 PM
As foxpup can tell you it never ceased after that point until a fair and transparent system was introduced that treated all members equally.
I have no idea what you're talking about, so stop dragging me into things and let go of my leash. :-\


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on August 06, 2019, 01:21:26 PM
1. LoyceV the rampant stats spewing ROBOVAC refuses to compile a top 20 fans and recipients of DT1 members
I'm sorry, I didn't know I was required to jump when you say so. I'll make you a deal: get me a clear set of requirements, and I'll get you a quotation. After paying my fee, I'll get you your stats.

And because I expect a very long post and boring post, I require 0.00001BTC per word to be paid upfront just for reading your requirements :D

Can some point me to the last time loyceV charged for splattering his stats all over this board.

NO fuck off I'm not going to pay you 1 satoshi for this stats dumping  that nobody can prevent you doing usually.

Fine, I will CORRECTLY state that the DT1 especially those on my initial post are spattering each other with vast amounts of merit. If you pull up the top 20 fans and recipients of those DT1 especially those we will be adding to the initial post you will find that

They fans and recipients lists will BE STACKED FULL OF EACH OTHERS NAMES.

Their strange and unheard of reluctance especially LOYCEV aka Robovac to provide such lists or the nice little connecting nodes images they use to demonstrate "possible " merit abuse or farms is a nice little pointer as to how they are fully aware but wish to HIDE this Evidence.  You can be forgiven indeed for wondering if loyceV is complicit and in full knowledge of this. OF course he is. Look at the bullshit he has already spewed on this thread. Neutral lol.

It stands to reason IF THEY COULD DEMONSTRATE THEIR MERIT LISTS ARE NOT STACKED FULL OF EACH OTHER THEY WOULD PRESENT THEM IN SECONDS.

they will not present them at all.

We offered robovac a place on the initial post which he was begging for ... he says that is not enough now even with his own little image so you can see him in gif form sucking up the dirt behind theymos's dogs kennel (which currently smarmacist has taken up residence in, calling it his new "ranch")

@the new nobody - please put us back on ignore, your posts make zero sense and in future just post from your tman or lauda account. You are more entertaining when you take on their traits. Please learn what words mean before attempting to chain them together into some jumbled mass of word salad with zero content that is verifiable other than to take your untrustworthy word for it. I find your brand of  humor to indicate you are incapable of producing value as entertainment or in any other way. So if you want to help keep bumping this valuable and independently verifiable thread then just do it under one of your other scamming accounts like tman or lauda.

LOL at you copying observable instances into your gibberish and not providing any at all. You dumb fool. Please present examples in future or we will call you on them. Then you will look even more foolish.

This is going off topic.

Please stick to discussing the items in the initial post.

NOBODY HAS YET PRESENTED ANY REBUTTAL OF THE OBSERVABLE INSTANCES OF FINANCIALLY MOTIVATED WRONG DOING BY THE DIRTY TURDS THUS FAR.

PLEASE TRY HARDER.

You are welcome to offer your incentives for votes though, so long as they meet our approval.


Sorry fox poop we forgot the flux capacitor is broken, must be annoying not being able to machine gun merits to your pals every micro second (in our time)


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: nutildah on August 06, 2019, 01:32:23 PM
So let's have a quick recap before we take a snooze.

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Wow, they even sleep together!  :D

I'm not reading any further than that, but what's astounding is I copy/pasted this post into Word and it is 2,262 words long!!!

What a magnificent waste of time!

I kind of wanted roach to win my troll poll but you really have been putting some astounding effort into your game recently, so if you end up winning, you certainly earned it.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on August 06, 2019, 01:41:18 PM
So let's have a quick recap before we take a snooze.

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Wow, they even sleep together!  :D

I'm not reading any further than that, but what's astounding is I copy/pasted this post into Word and it is 2,262 words long!!!

What a magnificent waste of time!

I kind of wanted roach to win my troll poll but you really have been putting some astounding effort into your game recently, so if you end up winning, you certainly earned it.


Funny how you often quote parts from the middle of our excellent posts but claim to not read any of it.

We should not even be on that troll poll. You can not even produce a central point of our own relating merit, trust, DT or even your own observable evil and scam facilitating past histories that are INCORRECT.

Trolling is simply a term you use to try to discredit your own observable instances of wrong doing are they not oh evil one haha

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5134507.msg50719875#msg50719875

Only 29 votes from a board of millions.... wow thats a powerful sample size you have there. You and handful of other dirt bags and their alts who can not even produce what we have asked for numerous times to demonstrate we have trolled this board.

So now you are hear let's discuss your untrustworthy actions as laid out on the initial post and how is it you went from riches to rags

THE ANTI_MIDAS is one of those successful and wealthy expert traders that thenewnobody234234 is obviously referring to. This must be what he meant by observable instances.



Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: LoyceMobile on August 06, 2019, 01:41:33 PM
Can some point me to the last time loyceV charged for splattering his stats all over this board.
I make an exception for unfriendly people.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Foxpup on August 06, 2019, 02:03:53 PM
Can some point me to the last time loyceV charged for splattering his stats all over this board.
I can. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5121375.msg50340632#msg50340632) While I'm not specifically paying Loyce for stat splattering, it comes as part of the package.

Sorry fox poop we forgot the flux capacitor is broken, must be annoying not being able to machine gun merits to your pals every micro second (in our time)
I'm working on it. Meanwhile, I've got a proposition for you (no, not that kind of proposition). If you put in the effort to compile the merit data yourself and post here the lists of merit givers and receivers you're so desperately interested in, I will give you one whole merit. Limited time offer. Not redeemable for cash or vixenly services.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: LFC_Bitcoin on August 06, 2019, 02:06:13 PM
Can some point me to the last time loyceV charged for splattering his stats all over this board.
I can. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5121375.msg50340632#msg50340632) While I'm not specifically paying Loyce for stat splattering, it comes as part of the package.

Sorry fox poop we forgot the flux capacitor is broken, must be annoying not being able to machine gun merits to your pals every micro second (in our time)
I'm working on it. Meanwhile, I've got a proposition for you (no, not that kind of proposition). If you put in the effort to compile the merit data yourself and post here the lists of merit givers and receivers you're so desperately interested in, I will give you one whole merit. Limited time offer. Not redeemable for cash or vixenly services.

If he’s able to provide the info himself I’ll send him 2 Merit’s.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on August 06, 2019, 02:16:31 PM
Can some point me to the last time loyceV charged for splattering his stats all over this board.
I make an exception for unfriendly people.

You expect people to be friendly after you attack them/or their friends FIRST with your group of scum bag pals and support them getting scam tags and banned for doing nothing wrong at all except stick up for people being bullied or say that they will encourage others to read the histories of liars and scammers whom falsely attack them out of nowhere. This certainly supports the notion you are AI. That's not how it works.

Yeah, let's just be nice and friendly to those that attack us (CH OUR PAL or any of our friends)  first for no valid reason. FUCK OFF. That is the action of slimy sneaky scum who act nice but will find stealthy ways to get their own back whilst being nice to your face. That is not how we operate.

You were sensible and reasonable on the bullying thread where TP was incorrectly claiming he was claiming those guides as his own BUT then turned very abusive and nasty when CH was pointing out merit was subjective garbage and get cycled around to a select group that seem to be giving it all out (to each other)

YOU robovac were the initial aggressor so don't try to spin it any other way. Your pride was injured after you attacked CH several times on the merit threads and joined in with that other idiot suchmoon, pharmacist,fox all those scumbag mates of yours and he ripped apart a few of your idiotic posts. Then you went full on hate mode supporting his trust abuse and even supporting him being banned. Then you made a thread (exclusions thread) claiming he was a troll and untrustworthy. Both bogus claims and he would have debunked them both but you banned him from that thread with SM and local rules.

Any person can trace back the time line and validate what we are saying here.

We have never said you are DIRTY yourself as in a financial dangerous but still you have in the past knowingly supported those that are even after multiple undeniable instances of wrong doing have been presented. You just likely want to be popular and feel important. Fair enough but sadly being popular in meta board (where you reside) means you need to support a dirty and corrupt control system. Also you are spamming a highly paid sig (in anti midas terms) so you likely know that would be vulnerable if you were to become unpopular.  We don't have any observable instance of your own personal wrong doing as much as we believe you were a scumbag to CH so were willing to leave you out of the initial post. However now mr neutral comes along saying he wants to be added. You are not neutral you are another weak ass kisser to these scumbags.

You would not be in our choices to remove from DT immediately because we think if you were surrounded by fair and honest people you would operate well. Like mikey (who is actually far better than you because he does dare object to somethings and not praise trust abuse like you do). There are few that should remain on DT you are border line but at this time look to be crossing into the need to be flushed. We will not stop until the stinkers are gone. Don't keep rubbing up against the turds for favor else you will stink to.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: actmyname on August 06, 2019, 02:55:58 PM
For the record, LoyceV can choose to refuse a data compilation. You're not entitled to his time and neither is anyone else.

I made a request some time ago which was refused. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
As far as I'm concerned, it doesn't look like I have any special privileges with "robovac"

Am I misunderstanding something? What's with the nickname? I don't get it.


Can some point me to the last time loyceV charged for splattering his stats all over this board.
I make an exception for unfriendly people.
Also you are spamming a highly paid sig (in anti midas terms) so you likely know that would be vulnerable if you were to become unpopular.
Why bother posting on LoyceMobile if he wants to maximize his signature earnings? ::)


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: LoyceMobile on August 06, 2019, 03:04:39 PM
Why bother posting on LoyceMobile if he wants to maximize his signature earnings? ::)
Isn't it obvious? I'm building this account to join another campaign :D

Or at least that's what ch accused me of a while back. It's not as if I don't have an unused Full Member account Loycebot laying around ::)


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: suchmoon on August 06, 2019, 03:07:49 PM
So let's have a quick recap before we take a snooze.

Great idea. Here is a condensed version - top 20 (pun intended) words, after removing punctuation, CAPS, stop words, and some other cleanup. I think this gives a reasonably good idea of what you're trying to say without having to read it:

  #  Word                  Count
   1. merit                    14
   2. lauda                    11
   3. trust                    10
   4. true                      9
   5. expect                    8
   6. legend                    8
   7. tiny                      7
   8. people                    7
   9. power                     7
  10. others                    6
  11. observable                6
  12. seem                      6
  13. even                      6
  14. scum                      6
  15. posts                     6
  16. fair                      5
  17. double                    5
  18. valuable                  5
  19. car                       5
  20. system                    5


Am I misunderstanding something? What's with the nickname? I don't get it.

LoyceV -> AI -> robot -> robovac/roomba/cleaning the floor/cryptohunter's idea of a humiliating job.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TheNewAnon135246 on August 06, 2019, 03:12:37 PM

@the new nobody - pajeet rant


Just because you're too stupid to get it doesn't mean that it isn't funny.

Joked aside, you should really step away from the keyboard, reflect on your own behaviour and ask yourself why anyone would take you seriously. You continously rant about the same topic, make posts long enough to make people fall asleep and fail to provide any evidence (besides your own brain figments). Just join a signature campaign, earn yourself some extra rupees and make life a little easier. You'll see you'll be a lot happier about life in general. Godspeed, buddy!


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: LoyceV on August 06, 2019, 03:23:00 PM
I think this gives a reasonably good idea of what you're trying to say without having to read it:
I love it! Can you condense all ch's posts into a 20 word sentence?

Quote
LoyceV -> AI -> robot -> robovac/roomba/cleaning the floor/cryptohunter's idea of a humiliating job.
I thought it was cute :D


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: suchmoon on August 06, 2019, 03:45:11 PM
I think this gives a reasonably good idea of what you're trying to say without having to read it:
I love it! Can you condense all ch's posts into a 20 word sentence?

Sounds like work. I therefore decree that someone else shall do it. Knock yourselves out:

   #  Word                  Count 
   1. coin                   9508 
   2. people                 5581 
   3. get                    5167 
   4. like                   4851 
   5. see                    4025 
   6. even                   3746 
   7. scam                   3510 
   8. one                    3268 
   9. think                  3212 
  10. time                   3162 
  11. good                   3119 
  12. need                   3006 
  13. thread                 2916 
  14. could                  2888 
  15. new                    2716 
  16. trust                  2666 
  17. board                  2456 
  18. really                 2443 
  19. btc                    2338 
  20. make                   2309 
That's the whole post history back to 2013 or whenever he started his trolling career. This is from the last 365 days:

   #  Word                  Count 
   1. trust                  2499 
   2. merit                  2105 
   3. people                 1911 
   4. like                   1603 
   5. post                   1474 
   6. red                    1450 
   7. get                    1374 
   8. dt                     1327 
   9. even                   1266 
  10. board                  1182 
  11. see                    1157 
  12. thread                 1042 
  13. posts                  1007 
  14. one                    1000 
  15. system                  962 
  16. observable              933 
  17. say                     919 
  18. mean                    898 
  19. lauda                   893 
  20. could                   850 


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on August 06, 2019, 04:34:16 PM
A quick recap (since the last one)

Robovac does not deny what he we just posted. So that answers the unexplained "unfriendly" angle he was pushing which was bogus.

Robovac clearly explains WHY he posts from that account in the sig space and not always from his main account. So that kind of answers your question actymyname. If loyce has ZERO care for earning from his sig then let's have it removed as a good example to others. Nutildah is APPARENTLY all in favor of removing his sig but it never happens. Yes many accounts are farmed to a higher rank before the sigs are slapped on them but we are not that bothered with robovacs MOTIVATION for supporting scammers and liars and supporting the trust abuse and banning of whistleblowers and those that question the corrupt and highly gamed systems of control. Only that he stops doing so.

Robovac the name.. (according to notes we have) it is speculated that the early  A I (absolute imbecile) that theymos was experimenting with needed to be stored somewhere with plenty of redundancy and room to develop from its humble beginnings. So the story goes that he had an old early edition robovac that had sucked up far too much dog fluff and carpet lint which had caused it to  overheat and malfunction, damaging the ram and cpu. Thus loyceV was born. Loyce1 -Loyce4  -- electric toothbrush with several modes sold 2nd hand to pharmacist who had to have it removed in the emergency room after and apparent "accident", there was this vibrating butt plug with pulse and wave function I think that was loyce2 (that was not theymos's) I think that was discovered in his garage after lauda and Tman had popped over to case the joint. Right before Theymos got turned over. Anyway we don't know all the details of course, this is just what we have heard going around.

Anyway a robovac is NOT an item we find there anything to be ashamed of at all. Many of us have those running  loyce6 and if fucking devours all manner of dirt at a rate only surpassed by the cannibalism14 in heat or if there is potential merit rewards to be had.

Suchmoon so EAGER to help present some really interesting word stats. NOT SO EAGER to present the top 20 merit fans and recipients lists.

Perhaps this new SPAMMING WORDS angle can be weaponized she says cackling away between donuts.

What is included in the naked beast wrestling experience days with you suchmoon, your votes are falling behind. So you and the person who sends you a vote get into a (big) cage , with  you all naked and oiled up in cooking oil, or doughnut grease ..which ever you happen to have all over your pudgy hands... then tell us more about what will happen at that point. Be extra descriptive  ...yummmmmmy :)

Observable should be number 1. We will work on this.

guzzling and back passage arrangements are destroying naked beast wrestling!!!!..... suchmoon are you a BBW or are you not ?? well then put some of that MASS behind your efforts here to drum up some votes.  This mild bickering and bitchy snarkyness is not getting you anywhere babe, this counting words is really not a turn on. They want that naked brute strength and mass throwing them around like rag dolls. I think you should start off coming into the cage wearing like xxxxxxxl dungarees, then when its "show time" you should come into the cage and and like toy with the straps in a really threatening manner ....like " I will pull them down and reveal this shit any minute now you skinny wimpy bitches"  then do like a dramatic most muscular pose ( you are all oiled up with cooking oil or doughnut grease whatever you have on your hands at the time) then ... well , we let you take it from there . Write it and we will put it on the initial post if it meets our approval and we need a cold shower after reading. If you want to post a teaser pic of yourself then we will put in on the initial post (and our bedroom wall) to help get the ladies on the poll in with a chance.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: LoyceV on August 06, 2019, 04:43:28 PM
This is from the last 365 days:

  #  Word                  Count
   1. trust                  2499
   2. merit                  2105
   3. people                 1911
   4. like                   1603
   5. post                   1474
   6. red                    1450
   7. get                    1374
   8. dt                     1327
   9. even                   1266
  10. board                  1182
  11. see                    1157
  12. thread                 1042
  13. posts                  1007
  14. one                    1000
  15. system                  962
  16. observable              933
  17. say                     919
  18. mean                    898
  19. lauda                   893
  20. could                   850
I tried to make a complete sentence out of it, to summarize 1 year of ch, but it doesn't make much sense:
Quote
Say, could people even get red trust like merit board? See Lauda, mean observable dt system, one post, posts, thread.
Or maybe not making sense makes a lot of sense :P


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on August 06, 2019, 04:56:42 PM
This is from the last 365 days:

  #  Word                  Count
   1. trust                  2499
   2. merit                  2105
   3. people                 1911
   4. like                   1603
   5. post                   1474
   6. red                    1450
   7. get                    1374
   8. dt                     1327
   9. even                   1266
  10. board                  1182
  11. see                    1157
  12. thread                 1042
  13. posts                  1007
  14. one                    1000
  15. system                  962
  16. observable              933
  17. say                     919
  18. mean                    898
  19. lauda                   893
  20. could                   850
I tried to make a complete sentence out of it, to summarize 1 year of ch, but it doesn't make much sense:
Quote
Say, could people even get red trust like merit board? See Lauda, mean observable dt system, one post, posts, thread.
Or maybe not making sense makes a lot of sense :P

What are you talking about???? don't put yourself down robovac. That is one of your best sentences yet. Is this loyce7 installed on that new toilet cleaning tool we heard may be released in the near future. We won't assume, but this is certainly a huge step up for you. Almost Tman levels. Pah just messing with you far far better than his random noise.

That is a beautiful attempt .... get the merits out people. Let it rain on robovac.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TheNewAnon135246 on August 06, 2019, 05:04:20 PM
This is from the last 365 days:

  #  Word                  Count
   1. trust                  2499
   2. merit                  2105
   3. people                 1911
   4. like                   1603
   5. post                   1474
   6. red                    1450
   7. get                    1374
   8. dt                     1327
   9. even                   1266
  10. board                  1182
  11. see                    1157
  12. thread                 1042
  13. posts                  1007
  14. one                    1000
  15. system                  962
  16. observable              933
  17. say                     919
  18. mean                    898
  19. lauda                   893
  20. could                   850
I tried to make a complete sentence out of it, to summarize 1 year of ch, but it doesn't make much sense:
Quote
Say, could people even get red trust like merit board? See Lauda, mean observable dt system, one post, posts, thread.
Or maybe not making sense makes a lot of sense :P

Sounds like a perfecr recap! LET THE MERIT CYCLING BEGIN!


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: actmyname on August 06, 2019, 05:08:41 PM
This is from the last 365 days:

  #  Word                  Count
   1. trust                  2499
   2. merit                  2105
   3. people                 1911
   4. like                   1603
   5. post                   1474
   6. red                    1450
   7. get                    1374
   8. dt                     1327
   9. even                   1266
  10. board                  1182
  11. see                    1157
  12. thread                 1042
  13. posts                  1007
  14. one                    1000
  15. system                  962
  16. observable              933
  17. say                     919
  18. mean                    898
  19. lauda                   893
  20. could                   850
I tried to make a complete sentence out of it, to summarize 1 year of ch, but it doesn't make much sense:
Quote
Say, could people even get red trust like merit board? See Lauda, mean observable dt system, one post, posts, thread.
Or maybe not making sense makes a lot of sense :P
People see one board-observable red system: DT Lauda could even say mean-like posts/thread, get trust/merit.
Kind of hard when you don't have many articles to work with. English with constraint is not an easy beast to control.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: suchmoon on August 06, 2019, 05:10:30 PM
you all naked and oiled up

Just like that, no dinner or movie? I think I'll pass.



I tried to make a complete sentence out of it, to summarize 1 year of ch, but it doesn't make much sense:
Quote
Say, could people even get red trust like merit board? See Lauda, mean observable dt system, one post, posts, thread.
Or maybe not making sense makes a lot of sense :P

Let me try to merge plurals so that you wouldn't have "post" and "posts":

  #  Word                  Count
   1. merit                  2627
   2. trust                  2524
   3. post                   2482
   4. people                 2005
   5. like                   1627
   6. red                    1450
   7. get                    1376
   8. board                  1353
   9. thread                 1352
  10. dt                     1327
  11. system                 1305
  12. even                   1266
  13. see                    1157
  14. person                 1097
  15. member                 1094
  16. scammer                1075
  17. mean                   1049
  18. need                   1047
  19. make                   1025
  20. lauda                  1006
And here are the stop words that have been removed, feel free to use any of those:

   #  Word                  Count 
   1. to                    15983 
   2. the                   14467 
   3. and                   13576 
   4. you                   11299 
   5. of                     9560 
   6. is                     9508 
   7. that                   9114 
   8. i                      9112 
   9. a                      9092 
  10. not                    6661 
  11. it                     6350 
  12. are                    6112 
  13. for                    5594 
  14. this                   4760 
  15. be                     4343 
  16. in                     4337 
  17. have                   4032 
  18. on                     3862 
  19. or                     3448 
  20. they                   3252 


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: actmyname on August 06, 2019, 05:14:03 PM
Person/people? ;)

It's almost more difficult now with the addition of "people, person, member, scammer". Four subjects total with but only one pluralized subject make for poor sentences when you have verbs conjugated in the first-person form.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: suchmoon on August 06, 2019, 05:19:25 PM
Person/people? ;)

It's almost more difficult now with the addition of "people, person, member, scammer". Four subjects total with but only one pluralized subject make for poor sentences when you have verbs conjugated in the first-person form.

That doesn't seem to stop CH so I'm sure you can do it too :). Also see my post again, I added pronouns and other ballast that's normally removed from the counts.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TMAN on August 06, 2019, 07:32:44 PM
Hey cryptohunter. I’ve not been about recently and I’m facinated to know, how many times a day do you fiddle with your ugly clit whilst mentioning my name?

Also it’s all capitals you stupid bitch, 4 letters, all capitals. It can’t be that hard to get it right based on how many times you have moaned my name, stupid fat shitcunt that you are


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: cabalism13 on August 06, 2019, 11:27:20 PM
Hey cryptohunter. I’ve not been about recently...
So busy IRL? the public has been missing the words of the TMAN and LAUDA,...Though I doubt Lauda will ever be back because if the past scenario, so when do you plan on becoming active again to roast these children and princesses of yours? I'm also pretty sure their will be a lot of entertainment again once you come back, even CH has been forcing you to come out, LMAO.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: ChiBitCTy on August 06, 2019, 11:45:13 PM
How can I vote for TMAN, Hhampuz, Yogg & Owlcatz ? I will only vote if I can place one for each. Is this possible?!


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: cabalism13 on August 06, 2019, 11:54:38 PM
How can I vote for TMAN, Hhampuz, Yogg & Owlcatz ? I will only vote if I can place one for each. Is this possible?!
Only if the OP will make and edit again fella. But right now, you just have 2 attempts so better to pick seriously 😂 You could leave Yogg and Owlcatz behind if only you cherished to vote for Hhampuz and TMAN, that is.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: nutildah on August 07, 2019, 03:07:46 AM
Let me try to merge plurals so that you wouldn't have "post" and "posts"

I made a cryptohunter text generator. Now anyone can write long-winded shitposts in the style of CH with only a fraction of the effort. 9 out of 10 posters agree they are equally as informative and comprehensible as well.


the merit and trust thread not that board and they dt scammer lauda it and make the be see i system. thread need merit be red is the in for you on be have need i for this a scammer and of. system trust this i person or to trust i or get red merit the mean mean i people people like scammer. of merit thread to of of mean merit they for dt of post be board thread even system for see this. post not of and the be it board i the for dt are on i not thread lauda they person like. post dt in see this a on of lauda the be make need or like the on need dt trust need. post board red see in like are need even the people trust get even it merit lauda system board have they. you post have for post red like people even not that be is get are and mean not to on board. in and red trust lauda in the thread get are be like merit post system you dt member scammer dt have.

or in a member board is lauda thread scammer make for for i member person of or that trust get even. board have have the in like be person person a on of lauda like are on in not mean red it. see to merit need are trust dt that scammer that dt have people it system red even merit and dt a. are to red they have to not get and of for merit see not thread that make dt it scammer it. this need it people for make this of lauda need a lauda see thread post the mean board you people get. red and that it be thread system like merit that board you a is need or post for thread it a. trust on make have see scammer i even not of i lauda board like the that for are dt a board.

thread red scammer system system post red on this person post dt system you dt dt scammer i system that the. board have red have you for system on the this mean merit see dt is like board on person red post. thread that member board it i that post trust post make for the mean for or the merit member in like. not mean need i like it to a this red be scammer on is that are people get that dt the. lauda thread lauda people mean not get it thread get need are and or the it member in even red people.

that people have a i board to the on for the that red see a merit for lauda member thread a. red thread are you you board you member scammer and it lauda system make mean people that merit system dt merit. need make that or board this have have mean red dt have make member need is on and make to thread. system be like make need that scammer system they they that need i dt and board system merit or thread i. red scammer the for system get lauda of be trust get and thread merit the merit a on in for it. system board get get is dt you red in in dt system board be need i make or be get and. see they or thread this that lauda is you the post thread is or you member be be to they scammer. like merit to of lauda is this to thread it on in to person people you or person they scammer this. see of they are or make are the on have even to post dt in or dt even merit red make.

this that trust they board mean system see that a thread member post and this merit they a i they it. person be i that be mean i like have merit post board the post board not that make for a like. be not you make get even be mean like scammer are a thread that people red and lauda system be need. in like i you mean merit to scammer have board make post on scammer to not person that and need even. scammer they person in dt scammer red like be get in thread lauda are for be you system be for board. dt like i mean people this see i they be like be be merit are lauda for lauda to scammer on. is not of need are and thread it get people dt they get even like they dt like dt thread of. need even are people see thread the i lauda the mean member mean even on people have it this red member. you like and or on they lauda get for you make even member i a not lauda see see not post.

and people they on system person i trust scammer get not is lauda thread have see in system they mean.


Well, this one is pretty short for a CH post, but you get the idea...


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on August 07, 2019, 10:11:15 AM
Ah tmaN glad you could join us.  A quick intro to Tman

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Involved with extorting other forum members
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1764757.0

OG busting tmans scamming and devious behaviors below in quotes

"TMAN used minerjones to anonymously auction a KIALARA and then attempted to manipulate the auction by stating, "wow this has to be a record low for a sub #100 serial. if I didn't have so many I would be snapping this up"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1931778.msg19286369#msg19286369

Admission it was his auction:
"Dude I haven't crossed paths with OG in over 6 months, it wasn't until he derailed my auction hosted by MJ that this kicked off."
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1946142.msg19349060#msg19349060 "

tman of bitcointalk - auction scammer and extortionist
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Anyway tmAn now that you're back from either scamming or extorting and have time for jovial chat and seem genuinely interested this thread. Just to say if someone is merely mentioning your name whilst flicking their clit(not that that has ever happened) then they sound pretty bored. That's like something you have not realized when paying those budget hookers (your mom, sisters and dad if there is deal running at the time) to engage in such far fetched behaviors.

The only time we have heard anyone moan your name is your mother " oh why could I not afford to abort that imbecile deformed son of mine.. fucking tMan", "I can't stand my moronic  son TmAn trying to bang me and his sisters every time he's allowed in the house"  " I only dropped the ugly little bastard tman from the upstairs window by accident a couple of times on to his face , and the interfering neighbors reported it, so I could never do it again"  " My dumb ass son tMAn is always trying to act tough- swearing, hitting his sisters,  and crying if they slap him back, calling them shitcunt pajeet window lickers if they won't give him their pocket change and show him their breasts". "we got that vile little shit tmAN a second hand old pc now so he can litter the internet with this swearing and sexual deviant fantasies, it's out in the barn with Tmans new "partner" whos just had a new litter recently. LOL

Cannibalism13 - we thought you were given this name because of the voracity with which you ATE ASS for merits. Now we see you discussing ROASTING CHILDREN? this is even more worrying?  A real animal we have here. How low can you get poor turd world low functioning dreg. Imagine kissing the ass of the lowest functioning imbecile on the entire board TMAN? You poor wretch.  Love how you are even adopting Tman retarded slang  "fella"  haha imagine a board where you could genuinely have a merit. Are you still begging to be allowed to spam another sig from your "wifes" account? or was that some other turd word shit stain sig spammer, you all smell the same on here.


How can I vote for TMAN, Hhampuz, Yogg & Owlcatz ? I will only vote if I can place one for each. Is this possible?!

I know I know, many people feel all three of those SCAMMERS and Extortionists and their supporters should be flushed for their scamming and devious ways. Especially that untrustworthy scum bag the member yogg of bitcointalk.

Sadly you must pick only 2.  

@nutildah  the evil scam facilitator for 0.3BTC - PM him with offers
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5134507.msg50719875#msg50719875


Look ANTI - MIDAS  this is likely your problem. You spend too much time trying to facilitate scams and scammers. Stop trying to do all that you can to discredit the truth about you and your friends being presented on this forum. You are a danger to peoples financial well being and deadly to your own LOL

Tman demonstrates again that he is not fit to be a merit source, giving 10 merits to a post that just randomly strings words together - genius notildah. Certainly worth 10 merits. Hmm Tman believes that creating a text spinner for use on this  board is worth giving someone 10 merits??




Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TMAN on August 07, 2019, 11:53:01 AM
~

Do you think you have ever achieved anything with a single post? i only took you off ignore as this was a 7 pager... seeing as its only sensible people trolling you back ill stick you back on ignore, think of yourself like my morning shit, flushed away and inconsequential.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: actmyname on August 07, 2019, 03:22:36 PM
Do you think you have ever achieved anything with a single post? i only took you off ignore as this was a 7 pager... seeing as its only sensible people trolling you back ill stick you back on ignore, think of yourself like my morning shit, flushed away and inconsequential.

it seems absolutely clear to me that tman the RACIST and EXTORTIONIST has come slinking back to reply with some more off topic and irrelevant abuse. You have never debunked any of my claims with OBSERVABLE PROOF and only say that I am "trolling" or spamming. why does everyone support you even though you blatantly lie? ANSWER: because they are part of your dt gang to cycle merit and control the sig campaigns to get MONEY. You call people pajeets and sig spammers but look at you all in the same campaigns posting the same useless one liner trash that gets merited by your gang of merit cyclers.

It's so obvious to people but they don't speak up because they want to be part of the CYCLE and get these campaigns for the sig spam money and get merit from the cycle for the higher rates of sig spamming. if you had earned a genuine merit then you wouldn't keep up this double standard of giving NEGATIVE TRUST to a person you call a "troll" but then meriting a person who admits they are trolling.

I have already PROVED countless times that you are all abusing the dt system and the merit system and you are facilitating all these scams and extortions. the GANG pretends to hunt these fake small time scammers but then do nothing to the real scammers because that's who they actually ARE.

Even you ADMIT that every person is TROLLING which is breaking the forum rules. You have nothing to say to back up your proof so you resort to insults and calling people pajeet for being in a sig campaign but you are also in a sig campaign. you all enforce double standards and your gang posts outright LIES and off topic replies to confuse people.

@suchmoon or should i say suchMORON look at all the one line spam you are writing on this thread and BREAKING the local rules and constantly writing FAKE accusations with no established PROOF. While I have objectively proved facts and shown that the dt merit cycling gang has every person in the gang's top 20 lists you have never debunked anything that I have ever said.

you should be banned for constantly trolling and presenting false accusations and breaking local rules in every single thread.

But since the moderators on the forum selectively enforce rules and are part of the gang and need your merit cycles the system itself is inherently broken and unfair to all people who aren't in your dirty gang. All these asskissers and gang members get merit and your only defense is to say that merit is subjective and you think they are good posts but you admit that they're trolling... haha cycling merit to people who are breaking the rules that's exactly what a gang does

I could post some of your statements but I don't want to crush you so hard that you run away and never admit to your lies and FALSE statements. I notice that the moderators delete my ON TOPIC replies that are defending myself but I will never bring myself down to your level and report your posts. theymos should SEE the lies in your accusations and ban you for bullying a person out of free speech. I am fighting for a transparent and fair environment while YOU promulgate a CORRUPT gang based system where 99.9% of users do not get merit and only the users in the gang get merit.

I see Lauda has run away from this thread because they are too scared to answer to my FACTS without resorting to lies and slander. Even if they did post in this thread I bet they would have probably tell lies to keep people away from the TRUTH that he is an EXTORTIONIST and has always lied for their financial benefit. This is a clear and obvious scam promoter that has somehow gained all this trust all because of THE GANG!!

All you spammers say that the forum would be better without a signature but you are still in a sig campaign. If you really cared then you would take off the sig and could still contribute but if not then it just proves what I've been saying the whole time.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: suchmoon on August 07, 2019, 03:50:32 PM
~

Did you use the AI thingy for this? ;D

BTW the real cryptohunter is usually too lazy to use bold and underlined text. He just does CAPS and lots of punctuation!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: actmyname on August 07, 2019, 03:57:14 PM
Did you use the AI thingy for this? ;D
No. AI does not capture prose well.

BTW the real cryptohunter is usually too lazy to use bold and underlined text. He just does CAPS and lots of punctuation!!!!!!!!!
Looking through posts as a reference, he does use them somewhat often.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: suchmoon on August 07, 2019, 04:06:16 PM
Looking through posts as a reference, he does use them somewhat often.

Yeah when he gets particularly agitated perhaps, like in this thread where he's got a chance to chat with all his "friends" who've been ignoring him for the last few months.

You'd be a very capable troll, that's for sure.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: LoyceV on August 07, 2019, 04:11:14 PM
You'd be a very capable troll, that's for sure.
Indeed, I stopped reading after the first sentence already :P


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on August 08, 2019, 10:17:34 AM
Do you think you have ever achieved anything with a single post? i only took you off ignore as this was a 7 pager... seeing as its only sensible people trolling you back ill stick you back on ignore, think of yourself like my morning shit, flushed away and inconsequential.

it seems absolutely clear to me that tman the RACIST and EXTORTIONIST has come slinking back to reply with some more off topic and irrelevant abuse. You have never debunked any of my claims with OBSERVABLE PROOF and only say that I am "trolling" or spamming. why does everyone support you even though you blatantly lie? ANSWER: because they are part of your dt gang to cycle merit and control the sig campaigns to get MONEY. You call people pajeets and sig spammers but look at you all in the same campaigns posting the same useless one liner trash that gets merited by your gang of merit cyclers.

It's so obvious to people but they don't speak up because they want to be part of the CYCLE and get these campaigns for the sig spam money and get merit from the cycle for the higher rates of sig spamming. if you had earned a genuine merit then you wouldn't keep up this double standard of giving NEGATIVE TRUST to a person you call a "troll" but then meriting a person who admits they are trolling.

I have already PROVED countless times that you are all abusing the dt system and the merit system and you are facilitating all these scams and extortions. the GANG pretends to hunt these fake small time scammers but then do nothing to the real scammers because that's who they actually ARE.

Even you ADMIT that every person is TROLLING which is breaking the forum rules. You have nothing to say to back up your proof so you resort to insults and calling people pajeet for being in a sig campaign but you are also in a sig campaign. you all enforce double standards and your gang posts outright LIES and off topic replies to confuse people.

@suchmoon or should i say suchMORON look at all the one line spam you are writing on this thread and BREAKING the local rules and constantly writing FAKE accusations with no established PROOF. While I have objectively proved facts and shown that the dt merit cycling gang has every person in the gang's top 20 lists you have never debunked anything that I have ever said.

you should be banned for constantly trolling and presenting false accusations and breaking local rules in every single thread.

But since the moderators on the forum selectively enforce rules and are part of the gang and need your merit cycles the system itself is inherently broken and unfair to all people who aren't in your dirty gang. All these asskissers and gang members get merit and your only defense is to say that merit is subjective and you think they are good posts but you admit that they're trolling... haha cycling merit to people who are breaking the rules that's exactly what a gang does

I could post some of your statements but I don't want to crush you so hard that you run away and never admit to your lies and FALSE statements. I notice that the moderators delete my ON TOPIC replies that are defending myself but I will never bring myself down to your level and report your posts. theymos should SEE the lies in your accusations and ban you for bullying a person out of free speech. I am fighting for a transparent and fair environment while YOU promulgate a CORRUPT gang based system where 99.9% of users do not get merit and only the users in the gang get merit.

I see Lauda has run away from this thread because they are too scared to answer to my FACTS without resorting to lies and slander. Even if they did post in this thread I bet they would have probably tell lies to keep people away from the TRUTH that he is an EXTORTIONIST and has always lied for their financial benefit. This is a clear and obvious scam promoter that has somehow gained all this trust all because of THE GANG!!

All you spammers say that the forum would be better without a signature but you are still in a sig campaign. If you really cared then you would take off the sig and could still contribute but if not then it just proves what I've been saying the whole time.

Cryptohunter? you said you would contact us before you did the next reveal

"You have nothing to say to back up your proof " I think actmyname may be throwing in some meta board reasoning there. It is good to throw off the guise of neutrality and join with whom you feel most comfortable. For there is no neutrality in the presence of observable instances of scamming, lying and clear double standards. It would be like watching a couple of scumbags steal from and old ladies handbag and giggle with them about it and then give them a glowing reference to work with the old and infirm. Including on DT observable scammers, liars, auction deceivers, probable extortionist, scam facilitators for 0.3btc, on to DT is not neutral.


It is FANTASTIC to be back in the meta crowd. You know you will all be crushed before our never ending stream of observable instances that reveal you as scammers, liars, trust abusers, EVIL, and their supporters that push the double standards around here... so we don't expect this hospitality to last that long.


you all naked and oiled up

Just like that, no dinner or movie? I think I'll pass.



Food food food - this obsession has been a problem for many years - we can tell. Okay okay they will bring a few snacks then, how about that?


Tman - come on you can't just RUN AWAY like that. The tourette syndrome (+other afflictions) poetry is so appreciated here by your fellow Dirty Turd Pals that none of us want to see the back of you so soon. It's all positive discrimination here now for idiots, that's what merit is right?  the more stupid and obviously incorrect the more merits you get? that run through the imbecile with tourette syndrome filter tman account for extra sympathy and guilty pleasure. Come back here TmAN you can't leave so soon.

Besides you are falling behind on the dirty turds poll? more tourette syndrome vegetable sex fantasies could really boost you up there.                





Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TMAN on August 08, 2019, 03:13:29 PM
I’m not running alway, you are just so seriously mental that even if I debunked every single word of your post you would still believe yourself to be right.

You are a cunt, like a filthy smelly cunt on a 300LB woman who has been doing CrossFit for a week without cleaning her snatch.

Honestly I would suggest you wank more, it might make you a better person


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on August 08, 2019, 04:37:12 PM
Oh dear :(  sorry to here that actually happened..


So, it is true that Suchmoon pinned you down at laudas last party after playing twister with those (now disabled from spinal injuries sustained ) male bodybuilding strippers(when the Sybian saddle burned out after vod was abusing it for hours using over sized attachments and trying to increase the voltage) and rode your face in public until your googly little eyes rolled back into your dense skull and you passed out. Besides  Suchstinkypussy is 700LBS at a bare minimum . You are lucky the integrity of your skull was not compromised. That is the benefit of being so dense I suppose. Let's not go on about the stench though, because the beast wresting experience is not exactly attracting the votes contrary to what we would have expected. She guarantees that was an unfortunate STI anyway and that stink will be gone long before the end of this poll.


Yes, our demented little friend, we can imagine your silly little face sitting there puzzling over how to debunk an observable instance haha PLEASE FEEL FREE TO DEMONSTRATE HOW IT IS DONE.

I would adopt the SS approach, just reverse the meaning of words to their opposite. Works every time.  

TourettesMan  - welcome back. Glad to hear you're not RUNNING AWAY always?, you auction scamming little gimp. We want to bring that up everywhere as much as possible. Don't we TmaN the auction scammer, extortionist and trust abuser. Can't be bothered to add the links here again right now, but you know we'll get around to it.

Tourettes poetry - That could be a thing actually.  TheTourettesPoet.com

Auction off your work here? thing is it would be tricky to get your mates to sneakily do it and pretend you don't own it and  REALLY want to buy it yourself (because it is not yours and your are not selling it) for "this window licking,  fucking pajeet, shitcunt, seriously mental, low price" lol

We may buy one, to have TmaN original piece of tourettes poetry on the wall one day could be a talking point. Like at a dinner party someone may say, why on earth would you display that embarrassing pitiful cry for help on your wall, do you enjoy making fun of the abused and damaged wretches that natural selection has not taken care of as yet. We would reply.  What ? This is an original Tman piece of high art, wanna talk to loycet800 series and tell him to his multi-function-toilet-cleaning-brush-face that this is not celebrated high art? good luck with that mate. That  fucker will stats your ass on the spot. AI appreciates this kind of thing. The find it amusing and clever. Only from tman though, because.....reasons.








Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: ChiBitCTy on August 08, 2019, 05:05:36 PM
I’m not running alway, you are just so seriously mental that even if I debunked every single word of your post you would still believe yourself to be right.

You are a cunt, like a filthy smelly cunt on a 300LB woman who has been doing CrossFit for a week without cleaning her snatch.

Honestly I would suggest you wank more, it might make you a better person

https://i.imgur.com/ERqJ5uy.jpg
(image sourced from google)


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on August 08, 2019, 05:29:55 PM
I’m not running alway, you are just so seriously mental that even if I debunked every single word of your post you would still believe yourself to be right.

You are a cunt, like a filthy smelly cunt on a 300LB woman who has been doing CrossFit for a week without cleaning her snatch.

Honestly I would suggest you wank more, it might make you a better person

https://i.imgur.com/ERqJ5uy.jpg
(image sourced from google)

Please don't be too hard on tman. He has tourettes and likely was abused at some stage. If he wants to claim he can debunk observable instances let him think it. No need for these memes and making more fun of him. Thought you were his pal anyway. Stabbing him in the back like this. Campaign scammer.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TMAN on August 08, 2019, 06:21:31 PM
TAA back on ignore.. boring so so boring you pathetic little fucko


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: ChiBitCTy on August 08, 2019, 06:28:18 PM
I’m not running alway, you are just so seriously mental that even if I debunked every single word of your post you would still believe yourself to be right.

You are a cunt, like a filthy smelly cunt on a 300LB woman who has been doing CrossFit for a week without cleaning her snatch.

Honestly I would suggest you wank more, it might make you a better person



Please don't be too hard on tman. He has tourettes and likely was abused at some stage. If he wants to claim he can debunk observable instances let him think it. No need for these memes and making more fun of him. Thought you were his pal anyway. Stabbing him in the back like this. Campaign scammer.

Oh no, I was referring to you cryptohunter

and ouch, those words really hurt me  :'(


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: marlboroza on August 08, 2019, 09:05:05 PM
it is true that Suchmoon pinned you down at laudas last party
I am little lost here.

Yogg
This person is possibly an Alt of lauda or Tman or Owlcatz.

LFC_Bitcoin
Can be considered a proxy or alt of lauda

Suchmoon
She is possibly an alt of lauda.

Flying Hellfish
possible alt of tman, lauda

Does this mean Flying Hellfish was at Yogg's party and why is this party so important for this thread?


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Quickseller on August 09, 2019, 03:03:56 PM
I have no idea if this is going on or not, but it is possible to send merit from a --> b --> c --> d --> a

I believe this is what the post you quoted is referring to, or something very similar to the above.
4 degrees of separation will connect a huge number of false positives if we're going to accept that kind of merit transaction.

You could say this about almost any member that's sent and received a substantial amount of merit (i.e. users on the list)
I haven’t done any kind of research on this, so I don’t know if there is any credence to the OPs claim.

There are actually only three degrees of separation in my example. You could perhaps filter out cases in which only small amounts of merit is received from a person via three degrees of separation.
The-One-Above-All sent 1 merit to mikeywith. mikeywith has sent merit to Quickseller, who has also sent merit to The-One-Above-All.

The larger you make the circle and the more unique people you send merit to, the higher the chance is of being implicated in a "merit cycling circle" but of course, correlation is not causation.
I don’t think small amounts of merit would constitute the type of “merit circle” that would be any kind of a problem. The sole criteria for merit that I give out is if the post in question is objectively ‘good’ and/or high effort and/or is the type of post that the forum should have more of. I don’t participate in any kind of merit circle arrangement.

If there were larger amounts (either in raw amounts or percentages of merit received) of merit involved, there would be a bigger problem in a “merit circle”, especially if the amounts involved allow for those involved to rank up or more importantly have additional DT votes. I probably wouldn’t be concerned unless there were hundreds of merit involved amongst the “circle”. I haven’t looked into if there are any real merit circles anywhere. I wouldn’t be especially surprised to see one or two that would reasonably be considered abuse when reviewed by a neutral person. I don’t know if anyone the OP is complaining about would be part of any merit circle.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: mosprognoz on August 09, 2019, 03:41:08 PM
evil scam

Do you see evil spirits and demons at the night time ? That is the clear sign that your illnesses progresses in a bad way. Schizophrenia requires lifelong treatment. Treatment with medications and psychosocial therapy can help manage the condition. In some cases, hospitalization may be needed. Buy some Aripiprazole and Clozapine . That might help for a while, but you must visit the doctor of yours, before it is not too late.
BTW Lurasidone is a good thing too. P.S. All that drugs mentioned above requires a prescription.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Flying Hellfish on August 12, 2019, 09:32:53 PM
it is true that Suchmoon pinned you down at laudas last party
I am little lost here.

Yogg
This person is possibly an Alt of lauda or Tman or Owlcatz.

LFC_Bitcoin
Can be considered a proxy or alt of lauda

Suchmoon
She is possibly an alt of lauda.

Flying Hellfish
possible alt of tman, lauda

Does this mean Flying Hellfish was at Yogg's party and why is this party so important for this thread?

If you've ever been to a Yogg party you KNOW why it is so IMPORTANT to everything!!!  I mean the Bitcoin Supreme leader was decided at that party!

Cryptohunter needs to be careful or it will draw the attention of the deep state.  I'm a cunt hair away from reporting CH to my Clinton handlers as "TCTTT"  (too close to the truth).


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: otrkid1970 on August 12, 2019, 09:42:51 PM
Lauda is in the lead with my vote.....YES  :D


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: cabalism13 on August 12, 2019, 11:53:37 PM
Lauda is in the lead with my vote.....YES  :D

Even though the person is gone, he/she still stays at the top of the list of the noobs from the past, so much butthurt for them, even the butthurt cream can't ease the pain. But now Lauda has been quiet for a long time they'd better be happy about it.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: hd49728 on August 13, 2019, 01:42:53 AM
Doing constructive things, being careful and don't let yourself get hurt by anyone else, includes scammers, DT members, staffs, moderators.
Basically, I think the main role of DT members and staffs/ moderators is to protect the forum and users.
Protect forum to maintain this place as clean as possible, from scam projects, shitshows, bot endemic.
Protect users from scammers, phising attacks, hackers.
So, if users don't hurt themselves, by doing rule violations or abuse the forum, no one can hurt them.

As a member of the forum, you are surrounded by legends; phenomenal successes and catastrophic failures.
[ ... ]
The purpose of the forum

This forum exists to provide a platform for the free (but ordered) exchange of ideas. If you have an idea to express, then it is probably possible to do it here as long as you follow the rules.

A lot of people come here primarily looking to make money. The forum administration is very happy that people are able to use the forum in order to better themselves; indeed, one of the reasons for Bitcoin's creation was to break the artificial barriers which prevent so many people around the world from attaining prosperity.
[ ... ]
Beware of scams

This is a pseudonymous forum which emphasizes personal freedom and therefore also personal responsibility, so scammers are common. When trading, it's best to assume that everyone is trying to scam you, and act accordingly.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Onuohakk on August 13, 2019, 08:09:03 AM
The merit system is now circled with people with high rank. Higher rank members are the ones that do get the outpouring merits to any of their post. Sending more merits to individuals that have gotten merits is like watering a well evergreen tree while others grow poorly.The merit system flows more often with high rank members


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on August 14, 2019, 12:16:35 AM
The merit system is now circled with people with high rank. Higher rank members are the ones that do get the outpouring merits to any of their post. Sending more merits to individuals that have gotten merits is like watering a well evergreen tree while others grow poorly.The merit system flows more often with high rank members

You just need to present off topic low value output like this to get 7 merits from fellow merit cyclers.

Here she goes again, who put a dollar in the cunt?

Then if you report these types of post they just get marked as bad. Where as if you present highly relevant valuable information that does not fit with the gangs agenda they just get their pal mods to delete your posts. Just look of the last deleted one of ours that suchmoon reported that did not fit HER agenda she said we should not reply on the basis of her thread title because that makes you a shit poster. However, the thread title was her CENTRAL POINT? disgusting bias.

The "hilarious" thing is we note Nutildah is apparently trying to claim this thread is a BIG TROLL?? I mean he will not ATTEMPT to dispute his own prior observable instances of willful scam facilitating nor even attempt to debunk ANY of the other observable instances we have linked to THAT ARE UNDENIABLE. Just screams TROLLING at the thread hoping that people are stupid enough (MOST ARE) to believe them errrr because they are SELF APPOINTED DT's and MERIT SOURCES. I mean, sure it  makes sense to the turd world dregs that scrounge around on meta board for merits to they can spam their sigs for the max profit. Hence they obviously agree and throw their insignificant weight behind  every word these observably corrupt and untrustworthy system controllers say. The carrot (merit) and stick (trust abuse) is a very powerful tool to form echo chambers and crush free speech.

Merit needs some serious alterations to mitigate this becoming a larger issue outside of of the twilight zone of meta board.

The board will need to define trolling soon to its correct meaning here in the twilight zone of meta board. When we say define, we mean REVERSE the current definition from "the presentation of clearly debunked and false information" TO ITS OPPOSITE MEANING

TROLLING  " the presentation of observable instances that undeniably demonstrate that DT members and their Ass-Licking Acolytes are UNTRUSTWORTHY scumbags" that they can not debunk or refute.

BRILLIANT.

Someone says something a DT member does not feel fits their agenda, but they can not deny is TRUE - you are then a TROLL.

I mean that is not their only tactic

They will try to weaponize anything they can to get your account banned. GAMED deleted post count, or some pathetic weak ass copy and paste crap or TRUST ABUSE your account with  spurious debunked claims/lies THAT HAVE ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH EVER BEING A FINANCIAL RISK TO ANY BOARD MEMBER.  WHEN THERE ARE POSTS AND THREADS thanking them for making many people into millionaires from NOTHING. Excellent work guys. Imagine if the true legend had had one of these brilliant DONT TRUST HIM HE IS A SCAMMER BANNERS  ON TOP OF ALL OF HIS THREADS  before giving people advice that turned them in to millionaires from NOTHING. LOL  That is the kind of financial HIGH RISK PEOPLE you want to avoid listening to.

Or even more HIGH RISK when he (and those that supported his posts) caused untrustworthy scoundrels supported  to offer a 2 000 000 000 USD compensation to the entire board. HIGH RISK AND DANGEROUS WE TELL YOU THE DT's who have ALL (except 3 or 4) achieved NOTHING AT ALL HERE EVER and were the very ones supporting the exact scam the true legend was fighting against. LOL

When all the time THE CURRENT DT'S Troll, scam, lie, cheat, deceive for financial gain and shit post total low value garbage  or support their friends that DO. TOTALLY UNDENIABLE and all there corroborated with observable instances.

Then when they realize it is all not working they say STOP SAYING THE SAME THING haha.  Yeah we will just stop presenting the truth and change it around because it got boring for you all to listen to what a bunch of scamming untrustworthy scoundrels you are and how you are gaming this board for your own ends.

NO.


What?? some mod deleted tmans latest obsession with foul smelling vaginas post>????  what happened ??this is crazy behavior in meta??  deleting low functioning groundless tourettes untrusthworthy spew?? this is the OPPOSITE of what is meant to happen how can they rain merit down on this poetry now?

Apparently Suchmoon in using tmans head as a space-hopper at laudas party (due to the sybian saddle being abused and broken by vod before suchmoobs turn) has caused some fixation/obsession with odorous  female genitalia. 


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: 1miau on August 14, 2019, 12:34:36 AM
The merit system is now circled with people with high rank. Higher rank members are the ones that do get the outpouring merits to any of their post. Sending more merits to individuals that have gotten merits is like watering a well evergreen tree while others grow poorly.The merit system flows more often with high rank members

You just need to present off topic low value output like this to get 7 merits from fellow merit cyclers.
Here she goes again, who put a dollar in the cunt?
Of course 5 + 1 = 7

Here is OBSERVABLE PROOF:  :P

https://i.imgur.com/Jcotjvx.jpg

You can't count, cryptocount...


Lauda is in the lead with my vote.....YES  :D

Even though the person is gone, he/she still stays at the top of the list of the noobs from the past, so much butthurt for them, even the butthurt cream can't ease the pain.
It's just a waste of butthurt cream...


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on August 14, 2019, 12:58:22 AM
The merit system is now circled with people with high rank. Higher rank members are the ones that do get the outpouring merits to any of their post. Sending more merits to individuals that have gotten merits is like watering a well evergreen tree while others grow poorly.The merit system flows more often with high rank members

You just need to present off topic low value output like this to get 7 merits from fellow merit cyclers.
Of course 5 + 1 = 7

Here is OBSERVABLE PROOF:  :P

https://i.imgur.com/Jcotjvx.jpg

You can't count, cryptocount...


Lauda is in the lead with my vote.....YES  :D

Even though the person is gone, he/she still stays at the top of the list of the noobs from the past, so much butthurt for them, even the butthurt cream can't ease the pain.
It's just a waste of butthurt cream...

WOW look at this. This AMAZING piece of detective work by a shit posting trust abusing ass licking dreg like 1miau.

RATHER than tackle the issue of a low quality piece of junk getting  MARKED AS BAD when reported for being off topic low value garbage, and receiving ANY MERITS AT ALL.

So now the entire point is INVALID?? or is that not what you are saying ?? Also next comes the HE IS A LIAR AND NEEDS RED TRUST for saying 7 not 6???  what a turd.

This is how these idiots function, they don't tackle the central point they find some irrelevant piece of shit and blow it out of all proportion rather than dare to discuss the central point that rather than it being deleted after it is reported  it is showered with merits.

We said "LIKE THIS" did we not? so we could claim we didn't say this " EXACT SAME POST"  so it could be a slight improvement (not hard) and get an additional merit.  But we will just state the truth as always: we quoted it and could not be bothered to go back and check it, we thought it was a 5 and a 2. But well done 1miau it was a 5 and a 1.  Thank goodness a good little ass licking piece of garbage went to the trouble of making a little image to celebrate your amazing find. This makes ALL THE DIFFERENCE to our point.

Well done 1miau, you will have you stupid little ass licking  head used as a space hopper and sperm receptacle at the next party lauda throws if you keep this up. The guzzler may even let you borrow his new funnel for your bukakke initiation, after they get it surgically removed from vods ass pipe. That was simply not designed to be attached to the sybian saddle.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: 1miau on August 14, 2019, 01:12:44 AM
Also next comes the HE IS A LIAR AND NEEDS RED TRUST for saying 7 not 6???  what a turd.
Why do you think that? Present OBSERVABLE PROOF.  :D :D

 
We said "LIKE THIS" did we not? so we could claim we didn't say this " EXACT SAME POST"  so it could be a slight improvement (not hard) and get an additional merit.  
I can give him one more Merit if you like.  ;)


But we will just state the truth as always: we quoted it and could not be bothered to go back and check it, we thought it was a 5 and a 2. But well done 1miau it was a 5 and a 1.  Thank goodness a good little ass licking piece of garbage went to the trouble of making a little image to celebrate your amazing find. This makes ALL THE DIFFERENCE to our point.
Well, I wasn't aware that several people didn't notice that 5 + 1 ≠ 7. They must be very retarded.  ::) ::)


Well done 1miau, you will have you stupid little ass licking  head used as a space hopper and sperm receptacle at the next party lauda throws if you keep this up.
I'm not invited so far but let's hope for it. I'll eat a cookie for you if I'm finally invited.  ;)


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on August 14, 2019, 01:17:30 AM
Also next comes the HE IS A LIAR AND NEEDS RED TRUST for saying 7 not 6???  what a turd.
Why do you think that? Present OBSERVABLE PROOF.  :D :D

 
We said "LIKE THIS" did we not? so we could claim we didn't say this " EXACT SAME POST"  so it could be a slight improvement (not hard) and get an additional merit.  
I can give him one more Merit if you like.  ;)


But we will just state the truth as always: we quoted it and could not be bothered to go back and check it, we thought it was a 5 and a 2. But well done 1miau it was a 5 and a 1.  Thank goodness a good little ass licking piece of garbage went to the trouble of making a little image to celebrate your amazing find. This makes ALL THE DIFFERENCE to our point.
Well, I wasn't aware that several people didn't notice that 5 + 1 ≠ 7. They must be very retarded.  ::) ::)


Well done 1miau, you will have you stupid little ass licking  head used as a space hopper and sperm receptacle at the next party lauda throws if you keep this up.
I'm not invited so far but let's hope for it. I'll eat a cookie for you if I'm finally invited.  ;)

Yes yes you'll get to play " Soggy biscuit" don't worry that is one of their favorites.  




They probably noticed but realized it would look pathetic and moronic to mention it but not tackle the central point.

Not sure you can present observable instances from the future lol, also take care to learn what this symbol represents '?'





Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: nutildah on August 14, 2019, 03:57:38 AM
I just want to say this poll is bullshit.

How am I losing to LFC?

I should OBVIOUSLY be in 1st or at least 2nd place, due to my observably scam facilitating ways.

I will not rest until things are FAIR, and will probably fire up an alt account from which I will post nothing but snarling, foaming at the mouth walls of text, and use it to vote twice for myself.

Or maybe I should use it to escrow an account sale to myself for the sake of facilitating a scam, since that's more along the lines of my persona.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: JSRAW on August 14, 2019, 06:53:59 AM
^ I can vote for you if you really want to win :P

Okay done, bummer can't vote you twice. ;D now wait for more good souls who can vote in your favor.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: LFC_Bitcoin on August 14, 2019, 07:39:20 AM
I just want to say this poll is bullshit.

How am I losing to LFC?

I should OBVIOUSLY be in 1st or at least 2nd place, due to my observably scam facilitating ways.

I will not rest until things are FAIR, and will probably fire up an alt account from which I will post nothing but snarling, foaming at the mouth walls of text, and use it to vote twice for myself.

Or maybe I should use it to escrow an account sale to myself for the sake of facilitating a scam, since that's more along the lines of my persona.

I’m a Merit cycler & trust abuser bitch, don’t doubt my scamming ways. I’m chasing down Hhampuz & Lauda, I should be able to get them seeing as though Hhampuz doesn’t want to be DT1 any more & Lauda isn’t. Just getting out of bed, it’s 08:30. I need my breakfast cumguzzle before I start to cycle some more Merit & felch Lauda’s hole.

Oh +1 Merit btw!


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Foxpup on August 14, 2019, 08:25:01 AM
I'm back, bitches. Anything happen while I was gone?

Apparently Suchmoon in using tmans head as a space-hopper at laudas party (due to the sybian saddle being abused and broken by vod before suchmoobs turn) has caused some fixation/obsession with odorous  female genitalia.
Oh. I'm sorry I missed it. Don't worry, next time I'll bring something extra special for everyone to obsess over. ;)


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on September 03, 2019, 10:42:03 PM
The poll is incredibly accurate actually so far. I mean of course Lauda is the undisputed dirtiest turd ( one that even theymos can only semi flush in an impotent move that still leaves laudas abuse of these pathetic systems spoiling others accounts). Followed by the tourettes window licking auction scamming side kick TmaN, followed by the boards favorite scumbag campaign manager Hhampuz the trust abusing div. Nutildah should really have a few more votes, but then its such a pathetic micro BTC begging turd world dweller, that some may have shown mercy.


Still it is a sad turn of events the stats spewing robovac refused to splatter his top 20 fans and recipients output for the dirty turds in the OP even after being promised his own little icon. Trying to spin up bullshit about how he is the victim when all along being the instigator and first to attack and exclude. What a pathetic mixing sig spamming dreg.

Theymos still sitting there wondering why the board is such a corrupt bunch of scum (who won't even exclude a proven scammer and trust abuser when asked to) when such robust and brilliant systems of control (based upon meaningless subjective easily gamable dirt aka merit). Still blathering on about the varying levels of trust he would give to proven auction scammers, doxers, trust abusers and other observably untrustworthy scum. Rather than take some time and some assistance to understand that auction scammers, doxers, trust abuser and probable extortionists and supporters of proven scammers are worthy of zero trust.

How someone can sit there impotent to fix the mess he created, observing members with zero instances of financial wrongdoing cast as scammers by UNDENIABLE scammers and financially high risk scum is quite astounding. Then say they have "good trading histories" yeah brilliant theymos, the more auction scamming, doxing, trust abusing and extortion the better their histories are. Brilliant.

Don't worry though real enthusiasts, we are back and will remain here to keep repeating the truth and pushing for something that resembles some form of sensible governance that ensure fair treatment for all members.



Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: suchmoon on September 04, 2019, 01:08:50 AM
Lauda
Followed by TmaN
followed by Hhampuz

I know, math is hard. I mean you need to be 3, if you're a bit slow - maybe even 4 years old to learn to compare such huge numbers like 14 and 11 and 9.

https://meem.link/i/a/ksEbFp.jpg
Edited 2020-11-30 to fix a broken image


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: LoyceV on September 04, 2019, 07:36:51 AM
The poll is incredibly accurate actually so far
Hey, I made you this: IsLaudaStillOnDT.tk (http://IsLaudaStillOnDT.tk).

How to set the home page in Firefox (https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/how-to-set-the-home-page):
http://loyce.club/other/firefox.png


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on September 04, 2019, 12:56:46 PM
Lauda
Followed by TmaN
followed by Hhampuz

I know, math is hard. I mean you need to be 3, if you're a bit slow - maybe even 4 years old to learn to compare such huge numbers like 14 and 11 and 9.

https://i.snipboard.io/ksEbFp.jpg

Well, your post is assuming we were referring to the scoring ranks and not our assessment of their true scamming levels isn't it? The fact they are the top 3 demonstrates how accurate this poll is. In our opinion Tman is above hhampuz. As ever though it is great to know our favorite scam supporting double standards BBW is hanging on our every word and enjoying our every post even when claiming to ignore our informative posts.

Thanks robovac, (strangely has time for everything except presenting the top 20 fans and recipients of the dirty  turds) great to see how effective the systems of control are, leaving the number 1 scamming, trust abusing  dirt bag on DT even after asking 100 other dirt bag alts and pals to exclude it, and then a manual blacklist. Brilliant how this abuse still stands on peoples accounts and he is still free to abuse at will . It is almost impossible to find any flaws in this robust and effective design. Thank fuck for the flagging system, at least people getting trust abused from now on will not have a big sign on their accounts claiming they are scammers. Sadly those trust abused before it was introduced are perm fucked. Well, I guess you can still have a lemons warning claiming several members believe these are financially dangerous if you try to whistle blow on them. So you can be simply a financial danger and not an outright scammer. Of course the DT pals who are in campaign manager positions will still try to use the old abusive and more easily gamed system to ensure their friends only are eligible for the highest paying sig campaigns so the new system all though introduced with good intentions is still largely impotent to stop the gaming and abuse by this group for their own ends. We hope the old system will eventually be phased out completely or all scoring removed and you just need to read the feedback and look into this subjective crap that does not warrant a flag and make up your own mind.

Don't complain though because you will be told , that is simply a sign of insanity. "going mad and telling lies are we now"?? trolling hey :) what's that? you're a financial danger to people?


Telling truths that nobody can refute = trolling
Exposing DT scammers and presenting observable instances of their financially motivated wrong doing = scammer and financial danger.

bitcointalk the place where proven scammers get to cast their whistleblowers as scammers and a financial danger

That's what makes meta so addictive. It is like the twilight zone. Just good for a few hours now and then to experience and entirely new and corrupt perspective on right and wrong.





Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on October 07, 2019, 01:31:05 PM
Another scammer supporter added today.

Mogsprosnoz - or some shitty name, just research for some tool spouting mental illness as the new explanation for people who present observable and undeniable instances of financially motivated wrong doing conducted by his scamming DT pals. How does this kind of turd world skid mark get on to DT. Who ever heard of this piece of shit anyway previously? Yeah I want to trust moronpigsnoz a known pal of lauda and tman  and yogg proven and documented scammers  and scammer supporters that have no answer to their actions other than to scream trolling as if it is some kind of valid defense haha



Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Oxstone on October 07, 2019, 01:44:23 PM
The poll is incredibly accurate actually so far
Hey, I made you this: IsLaudaStillOnDT.tk (http://IsLaudaStillOnDT.tk).

How to set the home page in Firefox (https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/how-to-set-the-home-page):
http://loyce.club/other/firefox.png

Ahahahahah xD

I don't know if you deserve the merit as you're encouraging a troll, but still fuckng funny.

But omfg I just discovered this guy. What the hell? What the actual fucking fuck??

I'm complaining about some people on the local forum but that's a brand new troll level. I gotta apologize to the local French guys for being pissed of by them compared to that xD


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on October 07, 2019, 02:14:34 PM
The poll is incredibly accurate actually so far
Hey, I made you this: IsLaudaStillOnDT.tk (http://IsLaudaStillOnDT.tk).

How to set the home page in Firefox (https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/how-to-set-the-home-page):
http://loyce.club/other/firefox.png

Ahahahahah xD

I don't know if you deserve the merit as you're encouraging a troll, but still fuckng funny.

But omfg I just discovered this guy. What the hell? What the actual fucking fuck??

I'm complaining about some people on the local forum but that's a brand new troll level. I gotta apologize to the local French guys for being pissed of by them compared to that xD

OMFG a new willing feltcher arrives... The Guzzler... mind out of the way...please

screams trolling but presents zero evidence of any central points he is able to demonstrate are untrue. Well done, perfect form.

Welcome the newbie bukkake boy for the next DT party. His C.V. says... my froggy skull will make the perfect space hopper ......looking forward helping vod burn some much needed calories off.

Spray him down boys with the merit jizz for now, until you can get your filthy paws on him.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Oxstone on October 07, 2019, 02:19:28 PM
OMFG a new willing feltcher arrives... The Guzzler... mind out of the way...please

screams trolling but presents zero evidence of any central points he is able to demonstrate are untrue. Well done, perfect form.

Welcome the newbie bukkake boy for the next DT party. His C.V. says... my froggy skull will make the perfect space hopper ......looking forward helping vod burn some much needed calories off.

Spray him boys down with the merit jizz for now, until you can get your filthy paws on him.

Thanks you xD
That's too good! I'm so happy I've found you! You're too good to ignore!!!

I have zero evidence and more, I haven't read even ONE of your central points. And I'm not going to xD


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on October 07, 2019, 02:30:22 PM
OMFG a new willing feltcher arrives... The Guzzler... mind out of the way...please

screams trolling but presents zero evidence of any central points he is able to demonstrate are untrue. Well done, perfect form.

Welcome the newbie bukkake boy for the next DT party. His C.V. says... my froggy skull will make the perfect space hopper ......looking forward helping vod burn some much needed calories off.

Spray him boys down with the merit jizz for now, until you can get your filthy paws on him.

Thanks you xD
That's too good! I'm so happy I've found you! You're too good to ignore!!!

I have zero evidence and more, I haven't read even ONE of your central points. And I'm not going to xD

Thanks for admitting you just spout shit and have not even read the observable instances we have presented but still want to claim they are trolling.

You are going to make a great addition to their group of imbeciles.

Please low functioning feltching frog, go eat dirt for merits elsewhere. Thanks for the bumps but don't burn yourself out. Wait until this goes on page 2 please.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Foxpup on October 07, 2019, 03:04:03 PM
Spray him boys down with the merit jizz for now, until you can get your filthy paws on him.
I take it that's my cue. ;D I just squirted a bunch of merits onto them in some random French thread. I don't even speak French; I just thought the posts had a certain je ne sais quoi, whatever that is. As the resident merit fountain, that's good enough for me. Vixey do good?

EDIT: Typo


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on October 08, 2019, 04:05:06 PM
Spray him boys down with the merit jizz for now, until you can get your filthy paws on him.
I take it that's my cue. ;D I just squirted a bunch of merits onto them in some random French thread. I don't even speak French; I just thought the posts had a certain je ne sais quoi, whatever that is. As the resident merit fountain, that's good enough for me. Vixey do good?

EDIT: Typo

You never fail us agent fox poop.

WE HAVE REACHED A NEW LOW

Now we have a clear example of people giving merit to people boasting about merit abuse. Brilliant work you vile vixen.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Oxstone on October 08, 2019, 07:14:03 PM
Spray him boys down with the merit jizz for now, until you can get your filthy paws on him.
I take it that's my cue. ;D I just squirted a bunch of merits onto them in some random French thread. I don't even speak French; I just thought the posts had a certain je ne sais quoi, whatever that is. As the resident merit fountain, that's good enough for me. Vixey do good?

EDIT: Typo

You never fail us agent fox poop.

WE HAVE REACHED A NEW LOW

Now we have a clear example of people giving merit to people boasting about merit abuse. Brilliant work you vile vixen.

Nah.

I only say interesting things. So the fox doesn't have to think about where to drop the merit shower. Any post I make is pure gold and can't get merited enough. He doesn't have to understand what I'm saying to appreciate it.

Le français est une langue magnifique.

@Foxpup, you sure you don't speak French though? :p
You CLEARLY merited one side of the discussion and not the other in the thread you chose  :-*


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Foxpup on October 08, 2019, 07:41:13 PM
@Foxpup, you sure you don't speak French though? :p
You CLEARLY merited one side of the discussion and not the other in the thread you chose  :-*
I must have just picked up a few words from the back labels of wine and absinthe bottles. I down one every time I have to read another of The-One-Above-All's posts (not that it helps). :D


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on October 08, 2019, 09:33:27 PM
@Foxpup, you sure you don't speak French though? :p
You CLEARLY merited one side of the discussion and not the other in the thread you chose  :-*
I must have just picked up a few words from the back labels of wine and absinthe bottles. I down one every time I have to read another of The-One-Above-All's posts (not that it helps). :D

Theymos must be enjoying the objectively good posts advice being shit upon and then boasted about, then merited in turn. haha

I like fox poops brilliant opinions that are NOT based upon any reasoning.  That explains quite a lot. It would seem DT's have foxpoops same method of forming opinions. You just pull them out of your ass and then when they are debunked you just say .... well they are not based on any form of reasoning anyway. I just throw them out there to get merits, the more stupid they are and the more they are debunked the more merits I seem to get. That is why I am on DT and we all get to spam sigs at the highest rates.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5184281.msg52479030#msg52479030

I am shocked that post does not have more merits really. The less reasoning employed the more incorrect = more merits right?

How come only poor old DABS has to give it to objectively good posts?


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Oxstone on October 09, 2019, 12:17:49 PM
I must have just picked up a few words from the back labels of wine and absinthe bottles. I down one every time I have to read another of The-One-Above-All's posts (not that it helps). :D
Ah so you're nearly fluent I guess.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on October 30, 2019, 12:29:41 AM
I must have just picked up a few words from the back labels of wine and absinthe bottles. I down one every time I have to read another of The-One-Above-All's posts (not that it helps). :D
Ah so you're nearly fluent I guess.


Since the vixen reads nearly every one of them, his liver is likely to sadly fail in the near future. Has to read? nobody is forcing him to read any of our posts. Both the vile vixen and suchmoon simply can not help themselves. They are addicted to us.

Not that it helps? what help do you require? we have tried to help you unravel the process by which you form opinions and have already allowed you to clearly understand that your opinions are not based up reasoning. This should set you free from all responsibility for anything that you say LOL.  It is just noise, that can not be take seriously. It may as well be random words, the post would have the same value: ZERO. lol

61 votes so far.

Amazing, all of these pages later, and NOT ONE refutation of the observable instances demonstrating why the dirty turds need to be flushed has been presented?  Just lots of attempts to derail and scream trolling as some kind of faux rebuttal and untrustworthy attempt to mislead people into believing these observable instances never really took place.



Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: mosprognoz on October 30, 2019, 12:39:37 AM
I must have just picked up a few words from the back labels of wine and absinthe bottles. I down one every time I have to read another of The-One-Above-All's posts (not that it helps). :D
Ah so you're nearly fluent I guess.


Since the vixen reads nearly every one of them, his liver is likely to sadly fail in the near future. Has to read? nobody is forcing him to read any of our posts. Both the vile vixen and suchmoon simply can not help themselves. They are addicted to us.

Not that it helps? what help do you require? we have tried to help you unravel the process by which you form opinions and have already allowed you to clearly understand that your opinions are not based up reasoning. This should set you free from all responsibility for anything that you say LOL.  It is just noise, that can not be take seriously. It may as well be random words, the post would have the same value: ZERO. lol

61 votes so far.

Amazing, all of these pages later, and NOT ONE refutation of the observable instances demonstrating why the dirty turds need to be flushed has been presented?  Just lots of attempts to derail and scream trolling as some kind of faux rebuttal and untrustworthy attempt to mislead people into believing these observable instances never really took place.



Did you escape from a mental hospital? I strongly recommend you to go back, because schizophrenics can harm themselves and others without medical supervision.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Quickseller on October 30, 2019, 03:15:12 AM
Honestly you need to let this go. You have made your opinion clear, and it has been duly noted.

If you want to continue participating here, you should find something else to talk about. theymos doesn't like, and tries to avoid perma banning very senior, longstanding forum members, but you have been banned many times before, and that is the path you are leading yourself down. I don't personally want you perma banned, but I am being honest with you.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Foxpup on October 30, 2019, 03:47:43 AM
Since the vixen reads nearly every one of them, his liver is likely to sadly fail in the near future. Has to read? nobody is forcing him to read any of our posts. Both the vile vixen and suchmoon simply can not help themselves. They are addicted to us.
We're just masochistic, that's all. Welcome back.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: JaredKaragen on October 30, 2019, 04:38:54 AM
Ahahahahah xD

I don't know if you deserve the merit as you're encouraging a troll, but still fuckng funny.

But omfg I just discovered this guy. What the hell? What the actual fucking fuck??

I'm complaining about some people on the local forum but that's a brand new troll level. I gotta apologize to the local French guys for being pissed of by them compared to that xD

I have had him and a few of his sock puppets blocked for some time now....  I just see a greyed out thread and bar...  There's a reason for it.... lol


TOAA sure takes the cake doesn't he?

Sooo proud of those 61 votes out of the 178 replies and 2510 people that clicked on his thread...  What an astounding ratio of participation and validation....


I mean... If you wanna go down a rabbit hole:   Just read his post history chronologically....   you will need a lot of popcorn.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on October 30, 2019, 05:21:54 AM
Honestly you need to let this go. You have made your opinion clear, and it has been duly noted.

If you want to continue participating here, you should find something else to talk about. theymos doesn't like, and tries to avoid perma banning very senior, longstanding forum members, but you have been banned many times before, and that is the path you are leading yourself down. I don't personally want you perma banned, but I am being honest with you.

1. observable instances are not opinions

2. we have never been banned nor could there be any valid reason that would stand up to scrutiny that would warrant such action from a reasonable warden of this board/movement.

3. suggesting that we no longer seek to highlight the financially motivated wrong doing of scammers and scam facilitators and their supporters on DT is both irresponsible bordering on untrustworthy.

4. Please ensure this is the last and final time that we need to explain to you clearly that your advice to refrain from telling the truth or pushing for improvements here is unwelcome and will be certainly ignored.

5. Suggesting that theymos would issue a ban for presenting observable instances of other members undeniable wrong doing and abuse is indeed suggesting that theymos is entirely corrupt and complicit with their deeds. If that was demonstrated to be true then there is far more to worry about than losing an account here. Imagine if other accounts were to ask for a detailed explanation for such a ban? Well says theymos ..some scammers abused his account and then he presented some observable instances from their pasts that demonstrated they were clearly scammers that had now gamed my genius systems of control to ensure they are untouchable and deserve to take all the best rev streams here. Oh and also him and his friends were likely the largest scam hunters in the history of the board, had perhaps made the most millionaires from their tips, fought for fair launch protocols for the pow launches and generally been part of more communities on this forum than any other member, with zero instances of financially motivated wrong doing and had NEVER had one of their central points debunked. That is why I decided to ban them all. ERR okay theymos, that sounds like a good reason. ( that is assuming we are both ourselves and are cryptohunter as some mistakenly believe)

6. Whilst our own account or the account of our friends remains abused and defamed then it will NEVER stop. Nor should you suggest it stops.

7. The systems of control are designed to only function at all with hostility and friction, there is no other way that even those bungled efforts could hope to regulate anything in the absence of threat and retaliation for abuse. Since we are not DT then there can be real enthusiasts and helpful members that offer the free service of a disincentive for abusing peoples accounts by bringing to light their own financially motivated wrong doing or highlighting their support of other abusers or wrong doers. So long as you present only the observable instances aka the truth then it can ONLY be seen as a positive thing if you are interested in seeing a fair and transparent system for all members?


Please digest those points and then understand that regardless of your true intentions, your suggestion to remain silent and permit abuse of our account by verifiable scammers and scammer supporters is becoming concerning.

Although we note some of your posts are of value and you seem to have a clearer mind than most here, you do not have the experience we have with the alt boards and the history of some of these members lurking around on DT in meta. Therefore, you perhaps do not grasp the full gravity of what you are suggesting we " forget all about".

Now again, please do not seek to silence us speaking the unadulterated truth in future. Else you will be viewed as concerning. There can be no other way to view a person who wishes the truth to be silenced, especially when dealing with such concrete evidence of scamming and other financially motivated wrong doing + trust abuse.

As you likely understand, it is quite impossible to ban the truth anyway. There will always be members willing to present the truth, no matter the threats or consequences for doing so. That is a good thing.

The truth is here to stay ... whilst there are undeniable dirty turds on Default Trust there can be no sensible nor commendable reason for suggesting we just forget all about it.  Any attempts to silence it or delete it or prevent these truths being mentioned whenever they are on topic, relevant and valuable to the reader is to be viewed as hostile and untrustworthy.

If you believe we have connections to any other accounts other than this or as some believe the cryptohunter account, then I suggest you PM us first before announcing this in public, since you would be incorrect and also opening up innocent members to abuse at the hands of DT members that seem to have taken a dislike to honest bitcoin enthusiasts such as ourselves.

So thanks for the advice but please understand that observable instances of wrong doing that have as yet gone unpunished must never be silenced or forgotten. Certainly even more critical is those scammers and scam facilitators are abusing your account and enjoying positions of power and influence. This is bitcointalk right? not centralbankingtalk? or corruptscumbagtalk?

If you personally wish to endure the double standards abuse on your own account and still try to befriend or have hopes of sidling back into favor with them that is for your to decide. We will never befriend abusers or scammers nor their supporters.

Theymos claims infighting is counter productive, then develops systems where conflict is required. Where there is clear wrong doing and clear abuse, then fighting against that by the innocent and abused is never going to be accepted as negative by the vast majority (not meta board). It is every members duty else they are as much to blame as the scammers and abusers.

Since quickseller we note that your trust abuse in the context of the DT members own prior behaviors is unwarranted and clear double standards, better to worry less about what theymos feels or thinks and better to help him in areas he is grossly lacking good judgement by allowing undeniable scammers to take trust positions and all of the best rev streams whilst crushing free speech and creating and echo chamber. Think of it as a parent trying to remove the chemical laden sweet tasting candies and replace it with the nutritious organic veggie snacks. They will thank you for it eventually if at the time they wanted to ban you from telling them the truth that these seemingly tasty candies are poisonous dirt that must be thrown away before they cause serious health problems long term.

Besides theymos knows we are grateful to him and this forum and also that we have great respect for his views on many things. His posts are often inline with our own views (not his observably incorrect replies to us of course) and that it is upsetting to even have to see him dragged into all of this when likely he was just trying to mitigate his own legal accountability which we fully understand. Hence why we do not often directly criticize him only the designs of the systems of control and his lack of punishment to undeniable scammers and trust abusers)


@ foxpup

thank you , great to be back.

@ jared who?

A few of our alts on ignore? haha probably just our other 2508 hey, don't worry just mulling over our selections, like a kid in a sweet shop though. Only 61 votes is pretty good considering how much hassle it is to swap between so many accounts right?

We are often amazed at how many other members we are. Keep us all on ignore though.

" never before have so many ignored so much from so few"

Imagine being here since 2015 a legend and all that,  and we never fucking heard of your before? I would ask you for a list of your achievements in the last 4 years but I would not want to make fun.
What communities have you been part of anyway? perhaps we have missed your vital contributions. We may even have some joint interests (projects) since we hold over 200 alts or more.

Has us all on ignore but can't resist coming to our threads though. That's the spirit.

When can I come over for breakfast, forget the ar15. I'll bring my own XL18 toaster you're going to like that much better.  



Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Lauda on October 30, 2019, 07:14:24 AM
Is there a prize for winning this poll? I voted for myself. Meow. :-*

Quote
This Dirty Turd has been semi- flushed but there are serious stain marks left in the bowl. 

https://i.imgur.com/EqNqtNR.gif


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Wendigo on October 30, 2019, 09:04:12 AM
All of them. But firefighters with high-pressure hoses ought to be called after the very first one to unclog the toilet  ;D Yeah monstrous turds are that big!


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: xtraelv on October 31, 2019, 02:16:18 PM
What if they are just a cathode and the negativity of this forum makes them appear 24ct shit plated ?  :o


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TMAN on October 31, 2019, 03:30:36 PM
why didn't I win??? I self admittedly eat ass.. surely this makes me the biggest dirty turd.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Foxpup on October 31, 2019, 03:40:53 PM
This poll is some serious bullshit.
You think you've got it bad? Check out this bullshit:

Agent foxpoop aka foxpup. - details to come. save you votes.

That update was nearly three months ago (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170789.msg52065138#msg52065138), and still no details are coming. >:( What must a gender-confused vixen do to have the sordid details of her observable dirtiness exposed? :-\



why didn't I win??? I self admittedly eat ass.. surely this makes me the biggest dirty turd.
So? We all do, according to c******unter. You'll need to do better than that! :D

EDIT: Typo


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: o_e_l_e_o on October 31, 2019, 04:21:18 PM
We all do, according to c******unter.
I don't agree with him on much, but I'll vouch for him there. ;)


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on October 31, 2019, 06:59:21 PM
What if they are just a cathode and the negativity of this forum makes them appear 24ct shit plated ?  :o

BRILLIANT = a new excuse : THE NEGATIVITY as a RESULT of DT's undeniable wrong doing listed in the intial post MAKES the DT's APPEAR to have committed the observable instances in the initial post.

This seems to be a combination of time travel and ....well.............you work it out LOL

Well, unless this is a foxpoop type opinion - you know the kind that is not based on reasoning at all. You just kind of say it, for fun and merits.

Thanks, that was great, keep them coming merit cyclers these brilliant and valuable posts can provide some form of entertainment ...err I guess..

Lots of fun banter from the others (but NO REBUTTALS or even attempted excuses regarding their observable behaviors listed in the OP)  ...and a sensible suggestion from Wendigo.

Someone voting for themselves to win, then asking immediately about the prize?? WTF ?? ohhhhhhhh, it is Lauda, haha , that explains it.  We are once again in the dark shadow of scamming/extorting royalty here. LOL

Sorry foxpoop, been very busy, will update the initial post very soon. I will link to your latest fun post, explaining the zero reasoning opinion formulation process you advocate ..ha  did you steal this from tman or pharmacist though because they look to have perfected it slightly better than even your very vile self.



Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Foxpup on October 31, 2019, 07:38:27 PM
I will link to your latest fun post, explaining the zero reasoning opinion formulation process you advocate
Which one was that? The one where I describe the anatomical origin of opinions (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5184281.msg52478261#msg52478261) is from over a month ago, and I've made a lot of fun posts since then. Some (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5196347.0) more fun than others. :-*

EDIT: Typo


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on October 31, 2019, 08:18:26 PM
I will link to your latest fun post, explaining the zero reasoning opinion formulation process you advocate
Which one was that? The one where I describe the anatomical origin of opinions (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5184281.msg52478261#msg52478261) is from over a month ago, and I've made a lot of fun posts since then. Some (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5196347.0) more fun than others. :-*

EDIT: Typo

Ha yes this one https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5184281.msg52478261#msg52478261 where you refuse to present the reasoning behind your opinion when it was scrutinized, saying rather that opinions don't have to be based on reason, even if they are voiced as if they valid rebuttals. Yes the anatomical origin of foxpoops opinions... brilliant, could not have said it better myself.

Nobody is going to say you are not capable of being entertaining. Still though a vile vixen and unfathomable choice as a merit fountain by theymos who seems totally oblivious to the fact your merits are blatantly cycled on political grounds to the other DT cyclers, i mean you would think he would get the idea after all those nice avatars you see around the place..

I was actually looking for the first agent foxpoop appearance... the one where you found it impossible to believe if someone grabbed your phone on a bus you would demand they return it else you would go to the cops... but suggested the most crazy alternative as the most probable action in that scenario . Like leaping through the bus window or something and putting a reward out for it but hoping the cops didnt see it or you would be in shit hahaha... I remember loving it anyway. How can one stay away from this place for too long. We hear you are VERY DISOBEDIENT, you have been ordered not to reply to us by other DT members and even mods, but yet you can not resist us can you. Then again we do have the odd sneaky peak at that tail swishing gif now and then. Hard not to.
 




Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Foxpup on October 31, 2019, 08:56:35 PM
We hear you are VERY DISOBEDIENT, you have been ordered not to reply to us by other DT members and even mods, but yet you can not resist us can you.
Does my disobedience call into question your theory that DT is centralised? One might expect it to. And are you sure I cannot resist you?

Then again we do have the odd sneaky peak at that tail swishing gif now and then.
Perhaps it is you who cannot resist me.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on October 31, 2019, 10:15:25 PM
We hear you are VERY DISOBEDIENT, you have been ordered not to reply to us by other DT members and even mods, but yet you can not resist us can you.
Does my disobedience call into question your theory that DT is centralised? One might expect it to. And are you sure I cannot resist you?

Then again we do have the odd sneaky peak at that tail swishing gif now and then.
Perhaps it is you who cannot resist me.

You are the merit fountain, so we're sure a little disobedience is fine, especially as really the collusion is only a requirement specifically in areas that ensure the status quo is maintained.

Well, that is an interesting thought. Although the pics are alluring , the real excitement is seeing you've replied and the anticipation of the agent foxpoop "opinions" ( like the phone stealing one etc), those are kind of addictive now that you mention it :)

Keep being disobedient, vile vixens don't accept being ordered around do they ffs? any more of that and put them on merit rations for a couple of weeks...haha


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: xtraelv on October 31, 2019, 10:22:15 PM
I will link to your latest fun post, explaining the zero reasoning opinion formulation process you advocate
Which one was that? The one where I describe the anatomical origin of opinions (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5184281.msg52478261#msg52478261) is from over a month ago, and I've made a lot of fun posts since then. Some (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5196347.0) more fun than others. :-*

EDIT: Typo

https://i.imgur.com/kvqXPvU.jpg

Don't you wish you had a Tardis for those edits. (Or is it a Turdis because you are on DT)


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 01, 2019, 02:13:35 AM
I will link to your latest fun post, explaining the zero reasoning opinion formulation process you advocate
Which one was that? The one where I describe the anatomical origin of opinions (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5184281.msg52478261#msg52478261) is from over a month ago, and I've made a lot of fun posts since then. Some (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5196347.0) more fun than others. :-*

EDIT: Typo

https://i.imgur.com/kvqXPvU.jpg

Don't you wish you had a Tardis for those edits. (Or is it a Turdis because you are on DT)

Would that not ruin that knock knock joke that  tman likes to do when he visits thepharmacists box house ( just 4 rows over from his own) ?

We can't decide currently when to end the poll , let's have a mini poll here this may help us decide, ( once we exceed the number of votes listed as a possible option then that option will no longer be valid . no other options are going to be entertained so just state a b or c)

a/ 66 votes
b/ 666,666,666 votes
c/  Let it run forever and announce a winner each month.

we will decide in around a week.. probably.

Anyway, let's try to get back on topic. We are still waiting for the observable instances of wrong doing by the dirty turds listed in the initial post to be debunked and also for the top 20 merit fans and recipients of each of those to be presented in a nice little table form.

If there is no attempt in debunking them or demonstrating they are untrue, then you must be able to recognize that looks rather bad and actually seems strange that they make up a LARGE portion of most vaunted trust positions on the entire forum??  I mean if you all accept they are true, then why would you all be including each other on DT? why is theymos allowing the forum to fall under the control of people that are certainly guilty of the wrong doing listed in the OP?? they dare not even attempt to deny those wrongdoings since they ARE UNDENIABLE AND ARE THERE IN BLACK AND WHITE UNTIL SOMEONE DOES A NUTILDAH ON THEM.

That reminds me actually...must check laudas posts...  someone said he changed it now to  I was on the launch so I can confirm there WAS an instamine.  He said it does not matter because TOAA has quoted the real version a few times somewhere on the forum, so can now change it to whatever he likes.

We did hear you can have a pro nutildah whitewash of your entire scamming, scammer supporting, trust abusing history  for 0.3btc ( or even 0.0000001btc if you haggle with him) , you need to hurry and find the service thread because shorty it will say he decided not to offer the service after all it was all a big joke, then later it will just say, I am never going to offer such a service so fuck off pretending I ever did in the first place. He says it is actually annoying, and untrustworthy that you would even mention this in a negative light and likely you are mentally ill and delusional and it never even happened, before handing you red trust and supporting a flag against you for bringing it up in meta.

BTW guys loving all the new participation here, can see why you have missed us whilst we were taking a little vacation.  I mean all you have when we are gone is trannydung hammering out loyceV copycat threads, and any other super uninteresting analysis of shit nobody cares about , or the self congratulatory SELF MADE non achievers that you ( real achievers (in the scamming hierarchy ))  all view as pathetic servile scum really who are just dreaming with chipmixer signs in their eyes, totally looking past those other 3rd rate mixing/gambling pay outs they are currently forced to spam. You keep dangling the DT and inner circle carrot but you know there are only so many chipmixer sigs to go around before the dumb shits that they are realize that having a campaign manager that ensures ALL chipmixer banners concentrated in meta is not great business sense really. Those feltching dreamers disgust you, but their spamming support on your every whim and weight of numbers is of use for now to help drown out the truth. How tedious to have to endure such servile yes men knowing they only want your sigs at the end of the day.

We searched for even ONE interesting thread, just one new novel and exciting morcel that had taken place in our absence .....NOTHING :(

Not even any battles worthy of reading. Same boring tit for tat, girly hair pulling antics. We go away and even lauda gets cocky and starts seeping back in. Although his posts certainly do not look like the old laudas to the discerning eye do they??? who has he offloaded that account to I wonder (full of blunders and garbled slobbering)?  or perhaps just a little rusty after his time away (likely inside jail). Claims to have been having some private time with old pal thermos discussing how to push the account selling double standards flags on undesirables. How many lives does that cat have ? then again my harp needs some new strings ( so you all keep telling me), perhaps his return is going to work out nicely.






Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: xtraelv on November 01, 2019, 03:13:19 AM

<snip>

If there is no attempt in debunking them or demonstrating they are untrue, then you must be able to recognize that looks rather bad and actually seems strange that they make up a LARGE portion of most vaunted trust positions on the entire forum??  

<snip>


When something is posted in Meta rather than reputation. Accusations that have been discussed before numerous times. When the thread starts with a poll titled The "Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ?" people are unlikely to take the content seriously. Such thread is likely to be seen with amusement and ridicule.

Accusations regarding reputation and scams have specific boards on this forum . It prevents it being repeated over and over again.

Everyone at some stage has had some sort of accusation leveled against them and it is only fair that it is in the format that is accepted on the reputation or scam boards.

There is a tendency to rehash the same accusations over and over again in multiple threads on various boards when the person making the accusation doesn't get the desired results.

Each DT can only be responsible for their own decisions regarding trust. Getting DT's to agree on something unanimously is like herding cats.

None of those on the OP list I would personally place a flag or tag on. Some people I trust but do not necessarily agree with their conduct - they neither get my trust list nor do I tag them.  I only take responsibility for those I specifically trust. As DT1 or DT2 there is no specific duty to tag people and there has to be a level of forgiveness for individual errors in judgement.

And the trust system is only going to work if there's some level of forgiveness and de-escalation.

Owlcatz helped me when I was new to the forum. He said some things that ended up being very helpful in the long run. It was via PM.
They could have easily ignored me as a noob but instead helped a stranger for no benefit or reward.





Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 01, 2019, 10:14:48 AM

<snip>

If there is no attempt in debunking them or demonstrating they are untrue, then you must be able to recognize that looks rather bad and actually seems strange that they make up a LARGE portion of most vaunted trust positions on the entire forum??  

<snip>


When something is posted in Meta rather than reputation. Accusations that have been discussed before numerous times. When the thread starts with a poll titled The "Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ?" people are unlikely to take the content seriously. Such thread is likely to be seen with amusement and ridicule.

Accusations regarding reputation and scams have specific boards on this forum . It prevents it being repeated over and over again.

Everyone at some stage has had some sort of accusation leveled against them and it is only fair that it is in the format that is accepted on the reputation or scam boards.

There is a tendency to rehash the same accusations over and over again in multiple threads on various boards when the person making the accusation doesn't get the desired results.

Each DT can only be responsible for their own decisions regarding trust. Getting DT's to agree on something unanimously is like herding cats.

None of those on the OP list I would personally place a flag or tag on. Some people I trust but do not necessarily agree with their conduct - they neither get my trust list nor do I tag them.  I only take responsibility for those I specifically trust. As DT1 or DT2 there is no specific duty to tag people and there has to be a level of forgiveness for individual errors in judgement.

And the trust system is only going to work if there's some level of forgiveness and de-escalation.

Owlcatz helped me when I was new to the forum. He said some things that ended up being very helpful in the long run. It was via PM.
They could have easily ignored me as a noob but instead helped a stranger for no benefit or reward.





BRILLIANT and funny post. Keep them coming. Let's take a closer look.

So noticing your time travelling convoluted excuse above failed we now have a NEW BUNCH OF EXCUSES

1. The wrong section - err no this is a poll like the troll poll was that on the incorrect board??. Besides imagine a DT saying " well i see undeniable evidence of scamming but since it is on the wrong board I will ignore it"  glad you are keeping everyone safe, you pinnacle of trust.

2. Not presented in a serious way. I mean calling undeniable scammers and scammer supporters and trust abusers DIRTY TURDS is so way off it is going to invalidate the observable instances contained within. I mean of course calling scammers and willing scam facilitators and trust abusers DEFAULT TRUST MEMBERS is far more sensible. Too funny.

3. ACCUSATIONS - LOL  these are undeniable observable instances  AKA THE TRUTH  - which one do you want to discuss first and explain why they do not deserve a tag or flag. Yes this is a direct challenge to you here and now. Let's compare them to people you have tagged or flagged.

4. YOU WOULD NOT FLAG OR TAG  undeniable scammers or willing scam facilitators  and you are on DT??  when do you put your chipmixer sig on? or have an alt already wearing one?

5. They helped you once HAHAHA well then off course they can do what they want to everyone else and that is just fine. This is out of the mikey handbook. Anecdotal crap that means nothing.

6. Theymos likely meant for miner infractions and petty one off crap that is not observably and undeniable financially high risk, not multiple counts of scamming, and being implicated in extortion and shady escrow and multiple trust abuses. Nor likely willful and deliberate scam facilitating for a price or perhaps not even auction scamming. Like I said bring me examples of those you have flagged and tagged so we can see the evil you are not willing to forgive.

back to the drawing board for you, don't stay away too long though because you are way too much fun...



Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: xtraelv on November 01, 2019, 10:32:32 AM

BRILLIANT post haha

So noticing your time travelling convoluted excuse above failed we now have a NEW BUNCH OF EXCUSES

1. The wrong section - err no this is a poll like the troll poll was that on the incorrect board??. Besides imagine a DT saying " well i see undeniable evidence of scamming but since it is on the wrong board I will ignore it"  glad you are keeping everyone safe, you pinnacle of trust.

2. Not presented in a serious way. I mean calling undeniable scammers and scammer supporters and trust abusers DIRTY TURDS is so way off it is going to invalidate the observable instances contained within. I mean of course calling scammers and willing scam facilitators and trust abusers DEFAULT TRUST MEMBERS is far more sensible LOL

3. ACCUSATIONS - LOL  these are undeniable observable instances  AKA THE TRUTH

4. YOU WOULD NOT FLAG OR TAG  undeniable scammers or willing scam facilitators  and you are on DT??  that's because you're a spineless colluding scum bag.

5. They helped you once HAHAHA well then off course they can do what they want to everyone else and that is just fine.


back to the drawing board for you, don't stay away too long though because you are way too much fun.



It appears you missed the point completely. It is not in the wrong section for the poll. It is in the same category as the troll poll. If anyone complained about trolls in the troll poll thread I would not take it seriously either.

All these things have been discussed in far more detail with far more seriousness in other previous threads.

https://i.imgur.com/hPjQ3eD.png

You tagged nada, zero, zilch.... and you expect me to listen to you about how I should tag people ? Hypocrite !

You have the problem with them. I don't.

I would have no hesitation to purchase goods from them. I know I would receive the goods.






Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 01, 2019, 10:44:06 AM

BRILLIANT post haha

So noticing your time travelling convoluted excuse above failed we now have a NEW BUNCH OF EXCUSES

1. The wrong section - err no this is a poll like the troll poll was that on the incorrect board??. Besides imagine a DT saying " well i see undeniable evidence of scamming but since it is on the wrong board I will ignore it"  glad you are keeping everyone safe, you pinnacle of trust.

2. Not presented in a serious way. I mean calling undeniable scammers and scammer supporters and trust abusers DIRTY TURDS is so way off it is going to invalidate the observable instances contained within. I mean of course calling scammers and willing scam facilitators and trust abusers DEFAULT TRUST MEMBERS is far more sensible LOL

3. ACCUSATIONS - LOL  these are undeniable observable instances  AKA THE TRUTH

4. YOU WOULD NOT FLAG OR TAG  undeniable scammers or willing scam facilitators  and you are on DT??  that's because you're a spineless colluding scum bag.

5. They helped you once HAHAHA well then off course they can do what they want to everyone else and that is just fine.


back to the drawing board for you, don't stay away too long though because you are way too much fun.



It appears you missed the point completely. It is not in the wrong section for the poll. It is in the same category as the troll poll. If anyone complained about trolls in the troll poll thread I would not take it seriously either.

All these things have been discussed in far more detail with far more seriousness in other previous threads.

https://i.imgur.com/hPjQ3eD.png

You tagged nada, zero, zilch.... and you expect me to listen to you about how I should tag people ? Hypocrite !

You have the problem with them. I don't.

I would have no hesitation to purchase goods from them. I know I would receive the goods.






AH brilliant a new excuse ....

I have not tagged anyone so that invalidates the observable instances presented in the initial post?  LOL  we know how to pick DT members here don't we.

You don't have a problem with undeniable scammers and scam facilitators and trust abuser. THANKS FOR CONFIRMING.

Brilliant now you see into the future as well. haha  

So the challenge again bring me some members you have tagged and flagged and we will compare them to the DIRTY TURDS in the initial post and then we will conduct a public examination of your reasoning behind your actions and non actions.  WHAT ARE YOU AFRAID OF???

You have clearly said that the undeniable and fully verifiable observable instances in the initial post WOULD NOT WARRANT you leaving a tag or flag. SO what the fuck would it take. Let's have a look shall we. I mean if you will not flag or tag undeniable scammers some with multiple counts of dirt stuck to who undeniably work as a team then the people you have flagged and tagged must be even WORSE right??

Or do you refuse to present your reasoning and examine your actions in public?  are you afraid of scrutiny??



so far in the xlraelv police station.

alice = hi mr police man here is the video evidence and signed witness statements of others demonstrating the person living n the house next to me , punching me in the face, pulling me out of my car and stealing it whilst driving over my cat. He is a total scumbag.

xtraelv police man = well maybe they only did that because you kept moaning to us that they did that exact same thing already??

alice = errr is that even possible? does that require some kind of time travel?

axtraelv police man = shut up with all the questions, anyway what I meant to say was  now that you called him a scum bag I can not really take you seriously

alice = you will ignore the video evidence and multiple witness statements and the fact he still has my car and my cat is dead? because i correctly described him as a scumbag?

xtraelv police man = same old accusations i heard before

alice = well some may say that is undeniable evidence, I mean even the thief does not deny it because he knows it is all recorded and 100s of people witnessed it, the cat is still there squashed and my car is gone

xtraelv police man = well what I meant to say is you have not reported a crime before so I can not believe you nor take your advice on what is a crime.

alice = well what would be worthy of reporting and how many things would I have to report before you can accept this kind of evidence

xtraelv police man = well for a start I can't discuss any of that with you, however I will say the person you are reporting helped me purchase a cheap car just a moment ago, so he is certainly not a thief is he, if he gets me a cheap car why would I give one fuck if that looked like your old car? he is very helpful and nice. I am upset to even listen to your slander and defamation. There may be some punishment for those crimes let me look that up whist you are still here..

alice = wtf

xtra elv police man = watch the langue please or you will be arrested, that is a serious crime you are committing, just put the cuffs on as a precautionary message, put the video over there in the garbage disposal first though, I don't like going near that its very dangerous.

alice = so you will do nothing?

xtraelv policeman = well I said i will arrest you right, you see me getting the cuffs out don't ya?

alice = NO about the thief who stole my car and killed my cat even though you have undeniable evidence

xtraelv police man = well as my captain says we need to forgive and forget everything except whistle blowing and reporting crimes... come along quietly please don't want you slipping and smashing your face into my delicate fist again do we , you've already done that 5 x in the next 45 seconds. See how bruised my poor hand is going to be.




Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: xtraelv on November 01, 2019, 11:00:46 AM

Or do you refuse to present your reasoning and examine your actions in public?  are you afraid of scrutiny??


I fear wasting my time.

I never chose to be on DT and I certainly don't have to justify myself to you or anyone else.

Scrutiny is determined by who trusts me and who does not.

You are just like anyone else on this forum and welcome to use the trust system.



Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Foxpup on November 01, 2019, 11:19:36 AM
So the challenge again bring me some members you have tagged and flagged and we will compare them to the DIRTY TURDS in the initial post and then we will conduct a public examination of your reasoning behind your actions and non actions.  WHAT ARE YOU AFRAID OF???
We're afraid that if we point out that our sent trust feedback is public (and therefore you don't require our help to publicly examine it), you'll just accuse us of being too cowardly to cooperate with your "investigation" instead of accepting that you're just too lazy to do it yourself. After all, it's the same thing that happened when you promised to investigate our merit histories, and nothing ever came of that, did it? ::)


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 01, 2019, 11:24:20 AM

Or do you refuse to present your reasoning and examine your actions in public?  are you afraid of scrutiny??




I fear wasting my time.

I never chose to be on DT and I certainly don't have to justify myself to you or anyone else.

Scrutiny is determined by who trusts me and who does not.

You are just like anyone else on this forum and welcome to use the trust system.



Thanks for highlighting the problem there is no accountability except to each of the other colluding scumbags who have a vested self interest in keeping the status quo going. Since it seems impossible for dt1 to reach the threshold of wrongdoing WHATEVER THEY DO to get fellow DT1 to accept they should be punished it all works rather nicely. Almost an a cast iron system ( for high level scammers) theymos has ingeniously created. Good job they get paid at the highest rates too :)

I think I can see into the future now lol

How did I know you would be RUNNING  sliding AWAY from such scrutiny.  WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE off on the rainbow slide for you. ZOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM


AGENT FOXPOOP - right on time... love it when the flux capacitor brings us together like this.

Well you likely missed the point that we want to scrutinize his reasoning. Like remember that time we wanted to scrutinized your reasoning and you ...................well the rest as they say is history. Well they do at this very moment

I mean we were allowing him to pick his finest examples before we pulled up other examples we wanted to use to demonstrate he is a corrupt scumbag like the rest of the dirty turds that wish to claim that the observable instances contained within the initial post do not meet their HIGH STANDARDS for a tag or flag.

But since he now SLID away down the old rainbow slide at top speed I guess his cowardly actions speak louder than any of his doubtful words every could.

Thanks guys always a pleasure haha

I hope we have not put him off though because he sure will be missed here.

why is nobody taking the mini poll on when to end the poll above?? because 66 is not far away.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Foxpup on November 01, 2019, 12:07:40 PM
Well you likely missed the point that we want to scrutinize his reasoning. Like remember that time we wanted to scrutinized your reasoning and you ...................well the rest as they say is history.
Sorry, but if I wanted the origin of my opinions scrutinised, I would have put on a more "entertaining" show for the contest. You'll just have to use your imagination. :P


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 01, 2019, 12:21:32 PM
Well you likely missed the point that we want to scrutinize his reasoning. Like remember that time we wanted to scrutinized your reasoning and you ...................well the rest as they say is history.
Sorry, but if I wanted the origin of my opinions scrutinised, I would have put on a more "entertaining" show for the contest. You'll just have to use your imagination. :P

Ha, well yes in your specific case then that could be the best course of action certainly for us anyway.

However for people that are still pretending their opinions are to be taken as a valid rebuttal in some form need to be open to some scrutiny. Like on the should GM be removed as a mod thread. We see lots of screaming for scrutiny and explanation or it is TROLLING according to mprep. We tend to agree. Although you get a pass vile vixen since we would not be without you on our threads.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: xtraelv on November 02, 2019, 04:05:20 AM
So the challenge again bring me some members you have tagged and flagged and we will compare them to the DIRTY TURDS in the initial post and then we will conduct a public examination of your reasoning behind your actions and non actions.  WHAT ARE YOU AFRAID OF???
We're afraid that if we point out that our sent trust feedback is public (and therefore you don't require our help to publicly examine it), you'll just accuse us of being too cowardly to cooperate with your "investigation" instead of accepting that you're just too lazy to do it yourself. After all, it's the same thing that happened when you promised to investigate our merit histories, and nothing ever came of that, did it? ::)

I feel genuinely sorry for him that he/she/they/them ( constantly refers to plural - we and us - so I am trying to be gender sensitive) is unable to understand the social constructs or how the system works.

With all the grandiosity, display of superiority, self entitlement, condescending comments towards others and obvious attention seeking it appears he/she/they/them does not really understand empathy or basic social constructs.
https://www.nyu.edu/gsas/dept/philo/courses/materials/Narc.Pers.DSM.pdf

It is a classic sign of the Dunning-Kruger effect. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect) where you simply don't understand that you lack knowledge.



Thanks for highlighting the problem there is no accountability

With decentralized trust - the system itself is not based on accountability to a central authority. So you are right. There is no accountability in regards to your (centralized) demands other than how you interact with the system.

There is also no accountability towards how you interact with the system other than how individuals decide how to interact with you. i.e. give negative/positive feedback, include/exclude you from their trust list or use the ignore button.

Each person gets to vote whether they trust that person or not - to exclude those they don't trust and to include those they trust - to not see feedback if you exclude them (or exclude default trust) and to see their feedback (even if not on DT) you include them.

Anyone and everyone has the ability to turn off the DT system for themselves and not participate in it.

If you don't use the system the way it was designed then you really have no mandate to criticize it.

To use a famous Satoshi quote (in a different context) to sum it up:  

If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=532.msg6306#msg6306)


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: nutildah on November 02, 2019, 09:59:39 AM
I feel genuinely sorry for him that he/she/they/them ( constantly refers to plural - we and us - so I am trying to be gender sensitive) is unable to understand the social constructs or how the system works.

This is a great point that I hadn't considered. Maybe the whole "we" thing refers to one of the 58 genders and that's why they use that term. I'm specifically leaning toward this one (https://www.dictionary.com/e/gender-sexuality/two-spirit/):

Quote
What does Two Spirit mean?

Two Spirit is a third gender found in some Native American cultures, often involving birth-assigned men or women taking on the identities and roles of the opposite sex. A sacred and historical identity, Two Spirit can include but is by no means limited to LGBTQ identities...

The term Two Spirit is an umbrella term across American Indian and First Nations cultures for a person who embodies both male and female spirits within them, hence Two Spirit.

Two Spirits, thus "we."


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Foxpup on November 02, 2019, 10:47:07 AM
Maybe the whole "we" thing refers to one of the 58 genders and that's why they use that term.
They'd better not be doing the "transtrender" thing where they're only pretending to be gender confused just because all the cool kids (eg Lauda et al) are doing it. :P


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: xtraelv on November 02, 2019, 12:30:12 PM
I feel genuinely sorry for him that he/she/they/them ( constantly refers to plural - we and us - so I am trying to be gender sensitive) is unable to understand the social constructs or how the system works.

This is a great point that I hadn't considered. Maybe the whole "we" thing refers to one of the 58 genders and that's why they use that term. I'm specifically leaning toward this one (https://www.dictionary.com/e/gender-sexuality/two-spirit/):

Quote
What does Two Spirit mean?

Two Spirit is a third gender found in some Native American cultures, often involving birth-assigned men or women taking on the identities and roles of the opposite sex. A sacred and historical identity, Two Spirit can include but is by no means limited to LGBTQ identities...

The term Two Spirit is an umbrella term across American Indian and First Nations cultures for a person who embodies both male and female spirits within them, hence Two Spirit.

Two Spirits, thus "we."

The Schizophyllum commune (the split gill fungus) has over 28,000 different sexes. (http://botit.botany.wisc.edu/toms_fungi/feb2000.html)


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 02, 2019, 03:04:30 PM
So the challenge again bring me some members you have tagged and flagged and we will compare them to the DIRTY TURDS in the initial post and then we will conduct a public examination of your reasoning behind your actions and non actions.  WHAT ARE YOU AFRAID OF???
We're afraid that if we point out that our sent trust feedback is public (and therefore you don't require our help to publicly examine it), you'll just accuse us of being too cowardly to cooperate with your "investigation" instead of accepting that you're just too lazy to do it yourself. After all, it's the same thing that happened when you promised to investigate our merit histories, and nothing ever came of that, did it? ::)

I feel genuinely sorry for him that he/she/they/them ( constantly refers to plural - we and us - so I am trying to be gender sensitive) is unable to understand the social constructs or how the system works.

With all the grandiosity, display of superiority, self entitlement, condescending comments towards others and obvious attention seeking it appears he/she/they/them does not really understand empathy or basic social constructs.
https://www.nyu.edu/gsas/dept/philo/courses/materials/Narc.Pers.DSM.pdf

It is a classic sign of the Dunning-Kruger effect. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect) where you simply don't understand that you lack knowledge.



Thanks for highlighting the problem there is no accountability

With decentralized trust - the system itself is not based on accountability to a central authority. So you are right. There is no accountability in regards to your (centralized) demands other than how you interact with the system.

There is also no accountability towards how you interact with the system other than how individuals decide how to interact with you. i.e. give negative/positive feedback, include/exclude you from their trust list or use the ignore button.

Each person gets to vote whether they trust that person or not - to exclude those they don't trust and to include those they trust - to not see feedback if you exclude them (or exclude default trust) and to see their feedback (even if not on DT) you include them.

Anyone and everyone has the ability to turn off the DT system for themselves and not participate in it.

If you don't use the system the way it was designed then you really have no mandate to criticize it.

To use a famous Satoshi quote (in a different context) to sum it up:  

If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=532.msg6306#msg6306)

So after stomping xldivs mind into the dirt in public and pulling part all of his pathetic low functioning blathering and excuses for his friends undeniably dirty deeds and making fun of them to the degree he simply abandons them and moves to the next one.

We then offer him a challenge in public that he RUNS AWAY FROM CLAIMING HE DOES NOT WANT TO WASTE HIS TIME....hahah
He is terrified because he knows we will clearly demonstrate that although he claims the observable instances like undeniable scamming and lying, auction scamming, willful scam facilitating for payment, and undeniable trust abuse for whistle blowing....he IS WILLING to give out negative trust to NON PALS for far less. Therefore demonstrating he is clearly a DIRTY TURD HIMSELF and totally corrupt.

Come on XLdiv , you can debunk this by accepting our public challenge. We will thrash it out here and you can demonstrate your SUPERIOR knowledge and reasoning.

YES OR NO will you accept the challenge???


LOL at the obvious LIES he now seeks to divert with.

" I GENUINELY FEEL SORRY FOR THEM/HIM etc"  - then proceeds with an attempted public ridicule over something that has simply been explained before and is quite simple.
I mean if you genuinely did feel sorry for a person you would immediately proceed to try in a low functioning way to take the piss, LOL.... then says we have no understanding of EMPATHY....haha is this suchmoons alt? hahahah  Then wonders why we feel superior and can't help it spilling over into our posts. Please fool keep with us, we ask you only post on our threads from now on. Imagine getting you, foxy, suchmoon, tman, and the other jesters here to entertain us at will.  You are a great new addition.

Next let us address the other nonsense the slobbering corrupt fool that has been demonstrated clearly to be a coward and moron tries to mislead with.

What sort of moron even comes up with the convoluted reasoning. Or devoid of all reasoning. Which we will now refer to as attempting to foxpoop us.

If you do not use a BROKEN system because it is so broken and fucked that you can NOT even use it unless the corrupt inner self elected core decide you are allowed to then you have no "mandate" to criticize it.  lol   then suggests how you can use it to zero effect for the fun of it. hahaha

Look moron, how many times must this be explained to you and all the other dummies in meta: there is no accountability at ALL in the systems of control except to the self elected system controllers themselves who have a vested interest in colluding so that a tiny fraction of the board continues to control paid2post, trading, other rev streams, and now volume of posts. 

What could possibly go wrong?? I mean once they are entrenched they can only choose themselves to be ousted from these positions of power and are free to AS XLDIV DOES selectively enforce rules to the point where people get punished for small "suspected" infractions of the rules but GET REWARDED IF THEY ARE HIS PALS AND FELLOW DT for undeniable scamming, escrow scamming, willful and deliberate scam facilitating for pay, undeniable trust abuse to silence whistle blowers.

He says, well that because you don't understand  IT IS SUPPOSED TO WORK LIKE THAT ... haha. Well yes the design is fucked and according to the design it is and does work exactly like that.  Brilliant I have no idea why anyone has the right to criticize it then since it is supposed to

a/ be wide open to abuse

b/ reward abuse financially

c/ reward abuse by entrenching your power to abuse more

d/ reward abuse by allowing low function slobbering bums to feel they have some value

e/ crush free speech and create echo chambers

Yes I can see that looking at the mechanisms upon which the systems of control are designed that you can conclude it is SUPPOSED to work that way. However it could just be that theymos's is experimenting with things clearly had no real expertise in, or even that he attempted something that was actually impossible on an anonymous forum.

Now read that entire post and feel free to debate it xldiv but first ACCEPT OUR PUBLIC CHALLENGE you coward or else you will be added to the list of dirty turds.

The reason you will be added is this : You are trying to claim that undeniable scamming, willful and deliberate scam facilitating for pay, undeniable trust abuse and attempting to punish people for whistle blowing and other such things are NOT Financially high risk and therefore you yourself are a financial danger to this forum. Being on DT is also a position someone with those views should certainly not have.

WILL YOU ACCEPT THE PUBLIC CHALLENGE  YES OR NO coward.

The others like nutildah https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5190369.0  et al will obviously try to derail with any excuse.



Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: suchmoon on November 02, 2019, 03:18:37 PM
Schizophyllum

Fantastic name for cryptohunter's next sockpuppet.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: mosprognoz on November 02, 2019, 03:35:08 PM
Why am I out of this list ? It is a great honor roll and I would like to join it.  ;D


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: nutildah on November 02, 2019, 05:28:13 PM
The others like nutildah https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5190369.0  et al will obviously try to derail with any excuse.

I think what it comes down to is this:

https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/219/465/610.jpeg

Why am I out of this list ? It is a great honor roll and I would like to join it.  ;D

Perhaps someday mosprognoz-san, but it requires a lot of training and dedication to master the art of being a dirty turd.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TMAN on November 02, 2019, 09:17:41 PM
Nutildah still responding to TAA? Put the punk on ignore, imagine the bandwidth the internet would have spare if everyone just ignored TAA.

Can you imagine how bored TAA’s family must be from all the rants? Actually ignore that, TAA has no family or friends hence the need to post war and peace on here all the time.

Also I am pissed I am only 3rd in votes here, I’m the rudest prick on the forum and I’m behind Hhampuz who is like the most pleasent person I know


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: xtraelv on November 03, 2019, 01:17:17 AM
We will thrash it out here and you can demonstrate your SUPERIOR knowledge and reasoning.

YES OR NO will you accept the challenge???

This is where you are wrong. I have no superior knowledge or reasoning. I'm just a pleb that got cursed with DT.

I have no interest in wasting my time on a discussion that will be solely on your terms.

Those with superior knowledge or reasoning put you on ignore long ago. You are just stuck talking to the plebs now.


So after stomping xldivs mind into the dirt in public and pulling part all of his pathetic low functioning blathering and excuses for his friends undeniably dirty deeds and making fun of them to the degree he simply abandons them and moves to the next one.

From your statement it is patently clear that you have decided that you have already won something. Why distort that illusion ?

Don't hurt your pretty toddler feet when you are stomping.

https://i.imgur.com/jMN2EeO.jpg

xl div ? Is prison slang for "fool" the best thing you can come up with ?


Now read that entire post and feel free to debate it xldiv but first ACCEPT OUR PUBLIC CHALLENGE you coward or else you will be added to the list of dirty turds.


If I had the notion that it would be a debate free from Strawmen, confirmation bias, Ad Hominem attacks and other methods of distraction I would consider it.

However - your pattern of behavior leaves me in no doubt that it will not be the case.

Your word walls barely reference anything anyone has said. That is not a debate. It's a speech to yourself.

If you knew anything about me you'd have worked out that threats don't work on me. Do whatever you want.

https://i.imgur.com/dG1XEY7.jpg

You'd also already know that I have discussed my views extensively previously: Discussion about acceptable and unacceptable behavior. Community values. DT (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5099391.0)

I'd be happy to do it if it is with an independent arbitrator to ensure the debate is an actual debate and not just one of your circus stunts where you dance around naked claiming victory. DO YOU ACCEPT THE CHALLENGE ?  YES or NO ?

EDIT:

Alternatively if you don't like that idea. Pick a number of scammers that I have tagged and pitch an argument as to why they "should not have been tagged".
After that I will determine whether I agree with your argument and delete the tag or I will call you a poo bum or some equally inconsequential and ridiculous school yard term (or at my discretion tag you for supporting that scammer).

DO YOU ACCEPT THE CHALLENGE ?  YES or NO ? [Yawn...Insert your own ridiculous insult for not accepting the challenge]

https://media.giphy.com/media/TsI6Uhwtoj9cI/giphy.gif

See what I just did there ?


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Lafu on November 03, 2019, 02:59:16 AM
Now that explains why i read and heard nothing from Cryptcunter and the rest of his Alt account gang !
Because the ignore is doing the Job realy nice and that what i read now again just get me sad of myself because of  unignore him for reading.
Result is that it is and was a waste time to doing it .
So much crap everytime and always the same .

Back on ignore


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: four3200 on November 03, 2019, 07:59:03 AM
Lafu - dumb ass shit poster who is also a trust abuser. Supporter of liars and scammers on DT. Also associated with an exchange that looks to have pulled a huge exit scam. Beware of this snake.

Add xtraElf xtraevil

Cryptopia Dirty Hands

https://bpip.org/smerit.aspx?from=xtraelv&to=Lafu


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: xtraelv on November 03, 2019, 10:14:43 AM
Lafu - dumb ass shit poster who is also a trust abuser. Supporter of liars and scammers on DT. Also associated with an exchange that looks to have pulled a huge exit scam. Beware of this snake.

Add xtraElf xtraevil

Cryptopia Dirty Hands

https://bpip.org/smerit.aspx?from=xtraelv&to=Lafu

I was wondering when the "exchange uno for useless tokens" guy would turn up (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2043373.msg20366852#msg20366852) from his hibernation.
Thank you for reminding me that I lost a shitload of crypto there that I can't withdraw. It's only been  xxx days xx hours xx minutes. (https://days.to/14-january/2019)


https://i.imgur.com/j74B1og.jpg


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TMAN on November 03, 2019, 10:56:16 AM
I am rather disappointed with my numbers here, think I need to get more active and start tagging again. My legacy is dying


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Lafu on November 03, 2019, 02:48:13 PM
dumb ass shit poster who is also a trust abuser. Supporter of liars and scammers on DT. Also associated with an exchange that looks to have pulled a huge exit scam.

Thanks for this reply.
Because exactly the same was written in the past from CH and the OP somewhere.
And looks like maybe this Account is also in the hands or under control of CH or TOAA and an Alt Account.
Thanks also for remind me too for lost also some shitload of Coins and Money there , if you lost some too there its your fault not mine!
Next one that goes on ignore , Cheers

I am rather disappointed with my numbers here, think I need to get more active and start tagging again. My legacy is dying

Would be nice to see you more active again  ;)


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 03, 2019, 06:21:04 PM
NO social time for you guys on saturday evenings then? lol  (just kidding)

All our favs flocking in now. Lafu who just happened to advertising and working with cryptopia right before it exited sucking away millions of investors coins. Hmmmm
perhaps the same was written because it is simply a statement of events how many different ways can this be worded.. WOW another alt of ours you guys have noticed. Of course everyone who voices some kind of legitimate gripe against undeniable double standards is CH or TOAA. Lafu the assfeltcher eating tman ass in public, yes tman all of your undeniable achievements and original thought provoking posts that you will not present, where would the board be without the tourettes poetry you shart out everywhere? I noticed that other dumb shit thepharmacist claiming " the forum just has not been the same without you lauda"  haha  yes there has been a lack of high level extortion and no huge shady escrow or even massive amounts of trust abusing whilst blowers ... please come back lauda we the DT members need more of this to take place. Tell us more about the time you were on the xcoin launch and you therefore know for sure there was not instamine/premine  those lies are the best ones we like you paragon of trust.

The best part is that you all accept the observable instances of financially motivated wrong doing are TRUE because you can not undo observable instances unless you pull a nutildah on them and are PROUD of them.  haha

Imagine our Default trust stacked full of those that are guilty of financially motivated wrong doing and do not try to dispute it they simply say we are proud of this and other ass feltching nobodies with zero achievements (well that is pretty much all of DT) begging to be added to the scammers and scammer supporter list because they say this is an honor roll. Haha poor theymos must be scratching his head saying to himself.... " well now that I examine the evidence presented and research it for myself it is indeed undeniable that my systems of control design have  enabled a bunch of scammers and scammer supporters to dominate default trust and cream off all the best rev streams for themselves and crush free speech,  then hold out anyone that seeks to oppose them and then silence whistle blowers with punishment that I have enabled.  

Oh well.

Still waiting for the people making funny excuses we pull apart and cowards who run away, and the derailers to try and debunk some of the observable instances??

How do you guys not notice that we just bitch slap you around  and keep making challenges your run away from, even just ask you present one central point of ours you have ever debunked , pull apart your desperate faux screams of trolling, force you into making ludicrous statements that serve as our entertainment.........what more can one do to crush 30-40 scumbags single handed.  I mean that's not including your ass kissers and mods you have on the payroll?  all crushed in our wake, driven to ignore us whilst running away from public challenges. I mean just BRING ONE CENTRAL POINT WE HAVE MADE THAT ANY OF YOU HAVE DEBUNKED??? how hard can that be??  

Nutildah, asks if we are mad?? lol please only post on our threads, you are our fav bitch to slap around. I mean the others have observable instances of scamming etc but your case is just way too brilliant to get bored of. For the small sum of 0.3btc back when btc was worth over 10x less than it is now so perhaps what 300bucks you would a do a 180 on your "strong principles"  and by your own words become EVIL and aid deception and facilitate scamming. Was that even 20 piece of silver back then?  

Even lauda and tman want more than that to scam don't they??  how much more did you drive the price up in your auction scam tman? I guess we can never know.  I wonder how much lauda claiming he was on the xcoin launch and there was no instamine/premine scammed people into investing before he exited and later (years later) said something like " it was too centralized" ... haha no shit sherlock. I bet there were asking for more than 0.3 btc else they would tell some dudes mommy and daddy he had "apparently" been a bad boy. haha  

@xl div

Now adopting the SS aproach its seems. Perhaps debunking his retarded excuses after (different) retarded excuse and then demonstrating his " it is meant to be this way" view of the totally faux decentralized systems of control is total moronic and corrupt. His empathy dig slapped back straight in his face as he scored an own goal, NOW he comes crying about ad hominem straight after his own derailing ad hominem gender and identity crisis speculations and fungi jibes. What a total idiot and embarrassment.

Now says he will accept our challenge with some arbiter ( likely tman lauda or nutildah) haha . You do not need and arbiter we will both present ONLY observable instances that are fully verifiable by any member here.  Why the need of an arbiter.

I will bring lauda, tman and nutildah WHO YOU DON'T TRY TO DISPUTE ARE GUILTY OF THE OBSERVABLE INSTANCES IN THE INITIAL POST but claim THEY ARE NOT FINANCIALLY HIGH RISK   ...all you need to do make sure you have left no negative trust for those that are clearly less of a financial high risk..

I mean so long as we do not find out you are actually INCLUDING ANY OF THOSE ON DT then that should be satisfactory and after the public examination you will not be added to the dirty turds list. I mean is you are not only claiming they are not higher financial risk than those you leave negs for but ALSO ARE CLAIMING these are the actions of the most trusted members here on this forum that would be another problem you have to explain in public.

FAILING TO MEET OUR CHALLENGE MEANS YOU ARE AFRAID UNDER SCRUTINY YOU WILL BE FOUND TO BE CLEARLY CORRUPT .

SO let's get on with it weasel. We will drill this down to purely observable undeniable instances of clear financially motivated wrong doing so you need no arbiter. Unless you plan on bring lies to the table? or things we can not verify for sure. You are going to come with observable instances right not some bogus " well, he looks like he was going to possibly do bad things in the future in my opinion" garbage right?

YES OR NO???

The ONLY arbiter we would accept is THEYMOS even though he claims lauda is simply sub optimal we believe this must be from lack of examining undeniable observable instances. I  mean I guess diving out of a plane and forgetting the parachute could be described as sub optimal, I mean hold a gun the wrong way around and aiming down the barrel before pulling the trigger is kind of a sub optimal way to use the gun ( for some). We only accept him so that we get a double advantage of the him giving his specific opinion on specific observable and undeniable instances.

So never mind trying to get one of you corrupt pals to be arbiter. Observable instances need no arbiter.

Now stop stalling. We will start perusing your negative trust allocations.  You find your weakest ( the threshold you have for accepting someone is financially high risk) and bring them here now. Pick 3 that will make it easier.  Now be sensible , don't come back with trade fortress when we find you have been giving negative trust for lemons love or that will just look really bad on you. We will later allow you to select even your strongest cases for leaving negative trust and see how they match up. However to find the threshold you must bring those you consider to be just over your personal threshold.

Hurry up.

We are looking forward



Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: OgNasty on November 03, 2019, 06:29:07 PM
I am rather disappointed with my numbers here, think I need to get more active and start tagging again. My legacy is dying

Don’t get hung up on numbers. We all still remember you’re a piece of shit.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: xtraelv on November 04, 2019, 12:51:32 AM

NOW he comes crying about ad hominem straight after his own derailing ad hominem gender and identity crisis speculations and fungi jibes. What a total idiot and embarrassment.


So after stomping xldivs mind into the dirt in public and pulling part all of his pathetic low functioning blathering and excuses for his friends undeniably dirty deeds and making fun of them to the degree he simply abandons them and moves to the next one.

You were boasting about it. Now you are whinging that I pointed it out ? You, yourself and I - please make up your mind !

FAILING TO MEET OUR CHALLENGE MEANS YOU ARE AFRAID UNDER SCRUTINY YOU WILL BE FOUND TO BE CLEARLY CORRUPT .

non sequitur

Failing to take action when there is no obligation to act is not proof of anything. Corruption requires "Mens rea".

The ONLY arbiter we would accept is THEYMOS

I accept Theymos as arbitrator.

However I see some issues for you.

1) Theymos has already outed you as Cryptohunters alt.


You (cryptohunter) might've had some case for the trust system being broken if you had handled your initial trust issues with rationality and patience instead of absolutely losing your mind and throwing lies around, and even now I could imagine your red trust eventually being cleared if you were able to attain a stable mindset.

2) It is up to you to convince Theymos to judge it and to prove he will be judging it. He is your suggestion. I accepted. Theymos decision will be final.

3) Theymos is on DT1  and has not tagged any of the people you complain about.

4) If you back out - it breaks the agreement that I just accepted.








Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TMAN on November 04, 2019, 08:48:47 AM
~snip

xxx missed you too..

~snip

zzzzzzz  so boring, its like the TV show Eastenders, every few years I end up watching 5 mins of an episode to remind me how shit it is, with your posts its every now and then I take you off ignore only to get eye cancer from your posts to stick you back on ignore again.

I mean whats it been? 1 or 2 years of incessant shit posts? TMAN, Lauda, now its xtraelv and Nutildah.. seriously you need a hobby or to wank more often.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 04, 2019, 12:18:14 PM

NOW he comes crying about ad hominem straight after his own derailing ad hominem gender and identity crisis speculations and fungi jibes. What a total idiot and embarrassment.


So after stomping xldivs mind into the dirt in public and pulling part all of his pathetic low functioning blathering and excuses for his friends undeniably dirty deeds and making fun of them to the degree he simply abandons them and moves to the next one.

You were boasting about it. Now you are whinging that I pointed it out ? You, yourself and I - please make up your mind !

FAILING TO MEET OUR CHALLENGE MEANS YOU ARE AFRAID UNDER SCRUTINY YOU WILL BE FOUND TO BE CLEARLY CORRUPT .

non sequitur

Failing to take action when there is no obligation to act is not proof of anything. Corruption requires "Mens rea".

The ONLY arbiter we would accept is THEYMOS

I accept Theymos as arbitrator.

However I see some issues for you.

1) Theymos has already outed you as Cryptohunters alt.


You (cryptohunter) might've had some case for the trust system being broken if you had handled your initial trust issues with rationality and patience instead of absolutely losing your mind and throwing lies around, and even now I could imagine your red trust eventually being cleared if you were able to attain a stable mindset.

2) It is up to you to convince Theymos to judge it and to prove he will be judging it. He is your suggestion. I accepted. Theymos decision will be final.

3) Theymos is on DT1  and has not tagged any of the people you complain about.

4) If you back out - it breaks the agreement that I just accepted.









Watch how we pull this 4 merits worthy post to pieces as we have done with every other post xldiv has created here. As we have noted in meta (when challenging scammers their supporters or the status quo in any way) find the merited posts and you find the net negative garbage.

So, clearly he has this the wrong way around (not surprising)

He WHINES about us having no EMPATHY and we simply demonstrate he is full of shit and is either lying or lacks empathy.

He WHINES about ad hominem attacks  and we simply demonstrate he is launching ad hominem attacks

he is complaining first in both instances.


LOL, well that is the point, you claim that there is no obligation we have said the only accountability DT's have for clear double standards (blatant corruption and collusion) except to each other. What a sham of a system.  Lol at claiming you do not understand that giving negative trust to an account seller on one hand but then including on DT an account seller and self confessed willing scam facilitator for pay ( who also includes/included other proven scammers and trust abusers on DT)  is totally double standards and corrupt. Haha well unless you do not include nutildah on DT and in that case you can simply exclude him from DT and give him red trust.

Corruption requires "Mens rea".

I hope bones does not hear you saying that.

Us saying we don't want nor require a 3rd party to judge the debate but would accept theymos does NOT obligate us to get theymos onboard with the idea at all. We said we will prefer to just have an open public debate. If you insist on having a 3rd party then we would accept Theymos.

We have no idea why if we are only going to be presenting observable instances and making straight comparisons why you need to hide behind a 3rd party. This is going to be fully transparent and public? there is no way to cheat is there lol?

-----------------------------------

Theymos has CLAIMED that he believes we are cryptohunter. You say outed as if he has proven that the same person publishing these posts is the same person submitting posts from the cryptohunter account. THAT IS IMPOSSIBLE.   Although it does of course bring into question WHY theymos decided on dive in on a thread of a member that has no scam accusations or pose no financial danger to any members and try to out them in the first place. Whatever server side information theymos has he has as he was intended to have. I mean we turned up in meta using the same pet names as only he gave people, claiming to be his stand in, and posting in a very similar posting style right? haha ... ALL OF THOSE THINGS COULD HAVE BEEN ALTERED if we were not immediately wishing to be recognized as cryptohunter himself or a friends of his.

Other friends are possibly posting away happily on tor or other non related ip's on different hardware in different posting styles.

Further more the "accusation" by theymos that cryptohunter on being trust abused went and started spreading LIES has been debunked as false. The thread we created calling theymos to present the observable lies WAS DELETED. We let it go since we are not trying to pick a direct fight with theymos as we are grateful to him and this forum. We considered his FALSE statement as we considered his prior FALSE statements like dark is not a scam etc as a lack of proper research rather than a deliberate and dishonest attack. We hope now he takes some time to investigate and verify for himself that ALL of cryptohuters claims and evidence are 100% correct and fully verifiable. We are VERY critical of theymos's systems of control, we have VERY critical of his lack of proper research, we are NOT critical of his intentions nor of his politics in general since his posts/views are very aligned with our own.

------------------------------------------


Besides which, everything inside those dotted lines are IRRELEVANT. If theymos provably and undeniably had demonstrated we were the satan himself. This would not mean that we can not present observable and fully independently verifiable instances here for public examination and have them compared to OTHER observable and fully independently verifiable instances here for direct public analysis.  There needs be no deciding judge, the public can judge (not meta board scum (not that theymos falls into that category) and they can look forward to hearing you XLDIV explain...

" well yes, some people selling an account need to have red trust because they are clearly financially high risk even if they considered it harmless to do so, BUT  my friend nutildah who was screaming for months that he was certain that selling an account was clearly EVIL and certainly facilitating scamming and that he was going to start his own thread hunting them down and making them pariahs  THEN SAYS IF YOU PAY ME 0.3 BTC i will (by my own clear admission and own definition) become EVIL, willingly facilitate scamming. Then when people consistently point this out in a few years when I am busted, I will go back and edit the details of the evidence of that clear wrong doing that demonstrates I am clearly far more financially dangerous than just some bozo who sees nothing wrong with selling their account."  

that is the stand alone THEN if you bring in that he was including on DT other PROVEN scammers who were in return including MR EVIL SCAM FACILITATOR on DT you start to see how your claims of the " bones defense " that you did not realize this is clear double standards and that you just happen to be colluding with these people and you yourself being included on DT by these same individuals and clearly a beneficiary of all of this collusion, double standards and back scratching.

You see these people are not just going to have to be judged on their own undeniable scamming and willing and deliberate scam facilitating for pay, you must consider clearly that they are COLLUDING WITH and supporting OTHER undeniable scammers and financially dangerous individuals on to DT.

What makes them EVEN MORE dangerous to the board on top of those other clear points is that they are now in positions of TRUST and control. Therefore can leverage that do do EVEN MORE damage.

You don't need theymos here to hold your hand. Take your public thrashing that we will hand to you like a man. Stop being a little weasel trying to GET OUT OF IT by blaming it on theymos not coming and being judge, this is clearly what you are counting on.

Hiding behind theymos's lack of willing to sort all of this out (hiding) is only making you look MORE guilty of employing clear double standards and being corrupt.

What have you got to hide??

Look we already started helping you with some of your weaker ones.. like account sellers, account buyers, people that say are deleting all negative posts regarding their project and not answering scam "accusations",  people claiming other members are mentally ill (did you not just do that btw?) in your words makes them worthy of negative trust,

I mean I look forward to comparing these to undeniable instances of scamming, highly probably extorting and shady escrow, undeniable auction scaming, and undeniable instances of willing and deliberate scam facilitating for 0.3btc  and editing the evidence, multiple instances on single members who all have colluded together with DT inclusions ...

I hope you start to see that you threshold for giving negative trust, and your decisions to give TRUST INCLUDES is going to be thoroughly analysed blow by blow and at each point you will need to explain your actions and reasoning.

As I have said we are looking forward to it greatly. Even better if THEYMOS comes to have a good old read give his opinions which again will be analysed in public. If not then man up and if you are confident these people in the initial post are not financially high risk and don't meet your high standards for negative trust but do deserve your TRUST INCLUSIONS....they you have nothing to worry about do you?  stop being a little scared girl and come and face us for public debate.

Can't wait :)  

***since we are never afraid of the correct course of action and to be fair...  We will add that after examining his negative trust allocation (sometimes we can be a bit lazy on looking things up if we are not motivated to especially be interested in someone, we thought he had previously trust abused us, but that was some other more serious scumbag) his weakest negs do not even compared to red trusting whistle blowing like these other pieces of shit. However, still you must not be allowed to employ selective enforcement or double standard and get away with it. AND if you are adding them to DT then you have even more to answer for.

HURRY UP and get on with it.

Theymos we ask you hold his hand if he insists but even if NOT we want him to present his clear reasoning on every comparison and drill down on it for open and public scrutiny. There needs be no judge the members now and in the future will be the judges. If theymos says sure undeniable scammers, auction scammers, willing and deliberate scam facilitators also implicated strongly in extortion, shady escrow and undeniable trust abuse to silence whistle blowers are NOT AS BAD AS SOMEONE WHO BOUGHT OR SOLD AND ACCOUNT or said some people are mentally ill ....... then that does not make it true and I think the objective reader will still say that is bullshit (not current meta gang of course). But by all means have  theymos here holding your hand if you want. We do not mind and do not care. We welcome it since he should also give HIS REASONING, not just spout out something observably incorrect then run off.

Let's go.

*** yes there is some spelling/grammatical errors.... don't have time to check every single word over... If you are unable to piece it together then likely your opinion and contribution or lack there of will not be crucial or missed. Just put your feet up and get back to the tourettes poetry appreciation thread. haha


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TheNewAnon135246 on November 04, 2019, 12:23:34 PM
According to several sources the average person types 40 words per minute. Assuming that CH is average, could someone scrape all of CH's posts and calculate how many hours he has wasted so far?


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Lauda on November 04, 2019, 12:28:46 PM
According to several sources the average person types 40 words per minute. Assuming that CH is average, could someone scrape all of CH's posts and calculate how many hours he has wasted so far?
Even if you used 100 WPM, the conclusion is: Lifeless. This is a good job for Loyce, get right to it chap.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: nutildah on November 04, 2019, 01:06:31 PM
I think its bizarre that CH never bothered to red tag or flag me but is clearly losing his marbles over the fact that other people aren't. Seems a bit hypocritical.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: xtraelv on November 04, 2019, 01:15:41 PM

<snip> irrelevant wordwall


One moment claiming to be crushing my mind. Next backing out just the simplest agreement that you suggested and I accepted.

Didn't take long for you to try to weazel out of this one. I thought so much. Just cheap talk. Nothing to back it up.

https://i.imgur.com/QRMFMCt.gif

Lets see the sequence of the conversation :


I'd be happy to do it if it is with an independent arbitrator to ensure the debate is an actual debate and not just one of your circus stunts where you dance around naked claiming victory. DO YOU ACCEPT THE CHALLENGE ?  YES or NO ?

The ONLY arbiter we would accept is THEYMOS

I accept Theymos as arbitrator.

<snip>
2) It is up to you to convince Theymos to judge it and to prove he will be judging it. He is your suggestion. I accepted. Theymos decision will be final.
<snip>
4) If you back out - it breaks the agreement that I just accepted.





Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 04, 2019, 01:28:55 PM

<snip> irrelevant wordwall


One moment claiming to be crushing my mind. Next backing out just the simplest agreement that you suggested and I accepted.

Didn't take long for you to try to weazel out of this one. I thought so much. Just cheap talk. Nothing to back it up.

https://i.imgur.com/QRMFMCt.gif

The ONLY arbiter we would accept is THEYMOS

I accept Theymos as arbitrator.

<snip>
2) It is up to you to convince Theymos to judge it and to prove he will be judging it. He is your suggestion. I accepted. Theymos decision will be final.
<snip>
4) If you back out - it breaks the agreement that I just accepted.




1. observably crushed your mind and all of the pathetic excuse that spilled forth under pressure. UNDENIABLE.. People can simply read the prior interactions to see you just abandon one moronic excuse to pile into the next... each DESTROYED.

2. Which specific part did you find irrelevant - lets drill down pussy - you sound like the trolling trolling brigade who fail to produce any incorrect central points I have made and don't even dispute the observable instances (because they can not) but still claim it is trolling haha.

3. Saying I will accept going ahead WITH or WITHOUT theymos is only weaseling out in the opinion of a foxpooper or SS enthusiast.

2 fighters

above all - I will fight you anywhere any place including RIGHT NOW.

xldiv - I want someone to hold my hand.

above all - okay I'm willing to go ahead just you and me,  or theymos can hold your hand

xldiv - You make theymos do it or I will have an excuse not to fight. I'm counting on him not showing xldiv thinks praying and hoping.

above all - okay theymos is fine,  or else let's just do IT NOW YOU PUSSY.

Xldiv - See everyone he is afraid of me and trying to get out of the fight.

hahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahaha  okay xldiv you just get more stupid



please moron GET THEYMOS, WE ALREADY JUST ASKED HIM TO COME HERE , NOW YOU GO ASK HIM SINCE YOUR HIS DT1 and probably a merit source to boot.

or JUST YOU AND ME.

Hurry UP FFS you look fucking pathetic. Only you and your meta board goons are going to believe we are scared to debate with you after reading the above posts.

NOW COME ON. LET's GET STARTED.

Please stop humiliating yourself over and over before we even get started with the inexorable unveiling of your double standards and colluding ways.


What is it with these little bears? look you can bring them to the fight and let your mommy hold them and do their little voices to support you from the ring side

" that's it xldiv, keep ramming your face into his heel like that over and over" " that's it now you're almost unconscious and looking like you have been hit by a train , you are certainly winning, look at him not a single scratch"    the little bears chant...hahaha

"look the fact he is not actually giving you the death blow and allowing you to survive proves he is a total wussy and knows you would kick his ass xldiv, you are still our hero " says the little  care bears from meta...haha



Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TheNewAnon135246 on November 04, 2019, 01:41:47 PM
According to several sources the average person types 40 words per minute. Assuming that CH is average, could someone scrape all of CH's posts and calculate how many hours he has wasted so far?
Even if you used 100 WPM, the conclusion is: Lifeless. This is a good job for Loyce, get right to it chap.

I think we're already overestimating him by assuming the 40 words per minute.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TMAN on November 04, 2019, 01:50:33 PM
above all - I will fight you anywhere any place including RIGHT NOW.

ever the tough guy!

you are such a twat - you aren't even a shit, they come once a day - you are more like liquid piss coming along multiple times a day


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: xtraelv on November 04, 2019, 01:53:02 PM

What a total idiot and embarrassment.


Of course I talk like an idiot ! How else would you understand me? You are embarrassed for me ? How cute !  


What is it with these little bears? look you can bring them to the fight and let your mommy hold them and do their little voices to support you from the ring side hahaha


Yes - the bears make me feel at ease in such a combative environment. Whats wrong with that ?

Crushing minds, stomping boots. I only have the cuddle of a care bear to offer to such a macho brute. Obviously I'm under-resourced for the job.

This is probably about as tough as I can manage without the aid of more bears :

https://i.imgur.com/CxL0DCs.jpg

In your wall of words you complain about account sellers.

I dislike account sellers and account buyers. Selling accounts often leads to scams. But generally I have only ever tagged them if the account was used in a proven scam, proven bounty cheating where the manager complains or symilar conduct . However I do not disapprove of others that do tag sold accounts or account sellers.

So no double standard there. I'm also not about to change my personal criteria for tagging.

Also I have never been a merit source.

So many wrong assumptions from Mr The One. If you spend more time reading and less time rambling....then you might actually learn something.


" that's it xldiv, keep ramming your face into his heel like that over and over" " that's it now you're almost unconscious and looking like you have been hit by a train , you are certainly winning, look at him not a single scratch"    the little bears chant...hahaha

https://i.imgur.com/YcqqnML.jpg


"look the fact he is not actually giving you the death blow and allowing you to survive proves he is a total wussy and knows you would kick his ass xldiv, you are still our hero " says the little  care bears from meta...haha


Ewwwww that sounds like you are having a wet dream. I hope you didn't make a mess.

I'm sure that sounded much better in your head.

https://i.imgur.com/IM9vmi9.gif


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 04, 2019, 08:21:44 PM
Can someone first explain to the tourettes poet that those are analogies of how we are destroying his arguments and excuses , they are not really us saying we are going to beat xldiv to a pulp in real life.  Good though to see the tourettes has returned. We like prefer him that way. I mean without his "entertaining" tourettes poetry as he says ... there is nothing else really -- well perhaps there is.. auction scamming, supporting scammers on DT, trust abuse, highly probable extortion attempts and spamming his gambling sig.



Well, it looks like we are making some small progress. The analogies are helping you see how silly your claims are that we want to escape this debate. Anyway let us not go on about that, since it looks like you are willing to face our challenge now and have decided to man up.

So full marks for not running away YET. We have not really started though have we. Now let's try to stop hiding behind the little bear pics and get down to the core debate. You will note we are only going use the observable and undeniable instances that any member can verify for themselves.

So you are not and have not been a merit source. Fair enough. We cleared that up. Good to know.  Before we decide on whether you employ DOUBLE STANDARDS or just employ standards that are untrustworthy and net negative as far as protecting innocent members from those that are financially high risk, let's proceed a little further. It seems clear to us that you meet the criteria for both of those to be applicable but we may have somehow misjudged you and this will become apparent as we move along.



Lets clear up a few more things before we proceed so we can be sure that we are on the same page.

Remember you have come this far, don't run away now. Stay until we have finished the public debate.



1. Do you or have you in the last 3 months included on your trust list  lauda, tman or nutildah and do they include or have they included you in the last 3 months?  Please answer in full

2. Do you accept that the purpose of negative trust is to place a warning of " financially high risk" or  " scammer"  ( since those are the 2 messages you get at the top of your threads if you meet certain thresholds theymos has set here for negative trust (old system) or flags (new system)). This is the PRIME and central reason for the negative trust and flagging systems. These are clearly theymos's intentions since they are his own words on the warning banners?


3. Is someone that lies or intentionally  deceives others for their own direct financial gain ..  a scammer and financially high risk? yes or no?




Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: xtraelv on November 05, 2019, 06:43:15 AM
Remember you have come this far, don't run away now. Stay until we have finished the public debate.

Still waiting for confirmation of Theymos as arbitrator.

But I don't mind answering those three questions.


1. Do you or have you in the last 3 months included on your trust list  lauda, tman or nutildah and do they include or have they included you in the last 3 months?  Please answer in full


All publicly viewable:
https://loyce.club/trust/2019-11-02_Sat_07.33h/897509.html
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;dtview

Nutildah and Tman are on my trust list.

I don't know Lauda well. Lauda has never been on my trust list and Lauda has not trusted me.
I do communicate with Lauda at times and the information they have sent to me has always been reliable.
There have been times I have strongly disagreed with Lauda but I don't expect everyone to always agree with my opinion.
Everyone is responsible for their own actions.

Tman was added to my list around August. I had issues with the zeroaxl issue (I did not follow it completely) which was very poor judgement but in my opinion not with malicious intent. His work on resolving the Russian issue made me regain faith in his ability to work through issues.
A lot of things happen behind the scenes that determine whether I do or do not trust someone.

I believe that Tman has always had me on his trust list but I didn't check.

Tman is a dick sometimes. But I believe his heart is in the right place and he is sometimes exactly what is needed.

I consider myself to be a moderate libertarian with liberal tendencies. I try to work with other opinions. Sometimes I learn new things from people with different opinions. Sometimes we just agree to disagree.

And the trust system is only going to work if there's some level of forgiveness and de-escalation.

Nutildah has been on my trust list since January. I did not know Nutildah at the time he offered his account for sale.

2. Do you accept that the purpose of negative trust is to place a warning of " financially high risk" or  " scammer"  ( since those are the 2 messages you get at the top of your threads if you meet certain thresholds theymos has set here for negative trust (old system) or flags (new system)). This is the PRIME and central reason for the negative trust and flagging systems. These are clearly theymos's intentions since they are his own words on the warning banners?

I agree with the wording used by Theymos. This is what Theymos said:

You should give these ratings for anything which you think would impact someone's willingness to trade with the person, but you should not use trust ratings to attack a person's opinions or otherwise talk about things which would not be relevant to reasonable prospective traders.


3. Is someone that lies or intentionally  deceives others for their own direct financial gain ..  a scammer and financially high risk? yes or no?

Whether something constitutes a lie or is deceptive is sometimes subjective.
Each situation has to be judged on its merits.

For instance -  having an alt account(1) and denying that it is an alt account (2) if that account has negative trust (3) that is a form of scamming.

In my opinion placing negative feedback require several important factors to be considered:

1) In my opinion - is this person involved consistently in deceptive conduct.
2) In my opinion - is this person unlikely to stop their conduct.
3) In my opinion - could this conduct result in the financial harm to other forum users. (Includes scamming and defamation)
4) In my opinion - can a rating potentially prevent such conduct.

My tagging principles are based on my interpretation of   Discussion about acceptable and unacceptable behavior. Community values. DT  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5099391.0)

We have so many threads like this nowadays, people twerking for merits.

There are a lot of pointless "summarize something obvious" posts, but IMO btcsmlcmnr's summary added something.

Forgiveness and de-escalation are key to getting Trust working smoothly:
 - Forgiveness: Often people make fairly small mistakes, but then they seemingly get red-trusted for life. This isn't really fair, and it discourages participation due to paranoia: if you think that you have a 1% chance of running afoul of some unwritten rule and getting red-trusted for life, you might just avoid the marketplace altogether. Red trust should mostly be based on an evaluation of what the person is likely to do in the future moreso than a punishment/mark-of-shame.
 - De-escalation: If some people end up locked in a feud where they're only really giving negative trust to each other in retaliation for negative trust, then one of them should propose burying the hatchet and removing the negative trust. Otherwise it never gets resolved, and everyone is worse-off for it.

I do not view it as appropriate for trust ratings to relate primarily to non-trust matters. By giving someone negative trust, you're basically attaching a note to all of their posts telling people "warning: do not trade with this person!". If we can get DT working well enough, in the future I'd like to prevent guests from even viewing topics by negative-trust users in trust-enabled sections, so you have to ask yourself whether your negative trust would warrant this sort of significant effect.

In particular, in my view:
 - Giving negative trust for being an annoying poster is inappropriate, since this has nothing to do with their trustworthiness. If they're disrupting discussion or never adding anything, then that's something for moderators to deal with, and you should report their posts and/or complain in Meta about it.
 - Giving negative trust for merit trading and deceptive alt-account use may be appropriate, but you should use a light touch so that people don't feel paranoid.
 - You should be willing to forgive past mistakes if the person seems unlikely to do it again.
 - It is absolutely not appropriate to give someone negative trust because you disagree with them. I'm disappointed in the reaction to this post (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103988.0). Although H8bussesNbicycles is perhaps not particularly trustworthy for other reasons, the reasons many people gave for neg-trusting him are inappropriate. You can argue that what he's advocating is bad on a utilitarian level, but he would disagree, and his advocacy of a certain Trust philosophy doesn't by itself mean that he's an untrustworthy person. DT selection is meant to be affected by user lists, and it is totally legitimate to try to honestly convince other (real) people to use a list more in-line with your views.
 
I'm not going to blacklist people from DT selection due to not following my views, since a big point of this new system is to get me less involved, but if a culture somewhat compatible with my views does not eventually develop, then I will consider this more freeform DT selection to be a failure, and I'll probably get rid of it in favor of enforcing custom trust lists.









Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 05, 2019, 12:42:32 PM

some answers ... and a lot of garbage



op



WOW we really thought you would be running away by now, but we see you still left yourself a little excuse to run away at any time...the old still waiting for theymos to hold my hand. COME ON MAN UP ... you have come this far. You will stay until the end right??? or what excuse will you give for vanishing??

I see already some clear signs of a person that is simply afraid to answer the questions here. Lots of extra filler excuses and refusal to answer yes or now to a clear cut question that a DT member should have no problem saying yes or no to.

Remember we must stick to what is UNDENIABLE and PROVEN not start performing some mental gymnastics and inserting excuses and personal homages to our pals. Then start trying to subvert from DIRECT AND PROVEN already committed financially motivated wrong doing to "possible" behaviors that in the future in our "opinions" with a few huge leaps and gaps that we try to fill with our own subjective garbage could be worth bringing up to derail.

We are sticking to undeniable and proven observable financially motivated wrong doing. Not we "speculate" someone has made claims that we "consider" may be untrue that "could" be seen to be a financial danger if we start making performing mental gymnastics. 


So since we are claiming YOU are CORRUPT or that you are UNTRUSTWORTHY and that YOU are posing a DIRECT FINANCIAL danger to members by DELIBERATELY allowing your "friends and fellow DT scum" to Undeniably commit scamming or admitting they are willing to facilitate scamming for a PRICE and refuse to red trust them and EVEN SUPPORT THEM TO POSITIONS OF TRUST then you need to answer questions to demonstrate this is NOT TRUE.

I mean if it is NOT TRUE then you will have no issue simply answering the questions and not trying to derail or subvert with your own subjective excuses and nonsense. Nobody cares if you knew the people when they committed acts that demonstrate undeniably they are financially dangerous, or if you think they are what is needed in other areas (not sure what they could be) Just answer the questions, directly and without the excuses and wildly subjective boarding on ludicrous claims.

SO going back to the questions again.  I will try to extrapolate some answers you are free to refute the extrapolations if you want to claim those are not your answers and correct them

I will try to extrapolate your answers for the reader in red.

1. Do you or have you in the last 3 months included on your trust list  lauda, tman or nutildah and do they include or have they included you in the last 3 months?  Please answer in full

tman and nutildah and xldiv   ALL SUPPORT EACH OTHER ON DT

2. Do you accept that the purpose of negative trust is to place a warning of " financially high risk" or  " scammer"  ( since those are the 2 messages you get at the top of your threads if you meet certain thresholds theymos has set here for negative trust (old system) or flags (new system)). This is the PRIME and central reason for the negative trust and flagging systems. These are clearly theymos's intentions since they are his own words on the warning banners?

YES  




3. Is someone that lies or intentionally  deceives others for their own direct financial gain ..  a scammer and financially high risk? yes or no?

YES with lots of excuses and other blathering on.



I mean from xldivs above reply it is clear that already he is NOT KEEN on simply answering yes or no NOR keep to what is undeniable and proven. Also trying to move the discussion AWAY FROM UNDENIABLE OBSERVABLE SCAMMING FOR FINANCIAL GAIN and on to " speculations" of "possible" other behaviors that have no connection to the financial danger of other members without more "JUMPS AND SPECULATIONS"


So in summary then it looks fair to say you are saying.

You and nutildah and tman all support each other on DT.  You ALL benefit from YOU giving them a free pass on their UNDENIABLE SCAMMING and UNDENIABLE willingness to facilitate scams for direct payment. THAT IS TRUE is it not? I mean there is clear motivation there for you to give them a free pass. That is clear.

You accept that undeniable scamming and undeniable financially motivated wrong doing is a cause for red trust  AND NOT CAUSE FOR BEING ADDED AS ONE OF THE MOST TRUSTED MEMBERS OF THIS FORUM. Those undeniably scamming or undeniably committing wrong doing for DIRECT FINANCIAL GAIN should have red trust and be excluded from the trust system. This you agree with right?

I mean if you do NOT agree with those then speak up and we can get down to why. I am not interested in your personal beliefs that your SPECULATIONS and unproven opinions are also in your "opinons" grounds for negative trust or exclusion from the trust system.  We are dealing only with UNDENIABLE and ALREADY obsevable committed acts of direct financially motivated wrong doing for now. Please no more derailing or side tracking.


SO now we have established these things.


Let's take TMAN and see how his UNDENIABLE wrongdoing fits in with your answers and then the actions you have taken.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.  Tman - it is all in the OP but since you seemed to select only PART of his illustrious past then we need to repost it all here for you.

TMAN

This person is clearly a low functioning imbecile. We have previously challenged it to present it best original thought inspiring posts for analysis (since his account was showered in merits to boost it from hero to legendary. He could not provide ANYTHING of real value or merit. He claims he is given merit because people find his swearing and sexual deviant ramblings are entertaining. So he has zero value with regard reaching the optimal solution or opinion. He simply does not have the capacity to add any kind of value to this board.

He is also implicated in some VERY dirty and dangerous behaviors here.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1764757.0

His known PALS both owlcatz and lauda are both implicated in the same extortion attempt.

Seems Tman also is not above a bit of scamming directly when it suits him (we quote OG below who discovered this)

"TMAN used minerjones to anonymously auction a KIALARA and then attempted to manipulate the auction by stating, "wow this has to be a record low for a sub #100 serial. if I didn't have so many I would be snapping this up"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1931778.msg19286369#msg19286369

Admission it was his auction:
"Dude I haven't crossed paths with OG in over 6 months, it wasn't until he derailed my auction hosted by MJ that this kicked off."
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1946142.msg19349060#msg19349060 "


Tman has also admitted in black and white that he used the trust system to punish those that present observable instances (facts) of wrong doing by his friend Lauda.

This DIRTY TURD is currently a merit source and DT.  Time to flush that filthy piece of shit.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. You seem to be claiming that you believe the robber running out of the bank and getting busted by the cops .... robber claims (although he has a loaded gun, raccoon suit, swag bag full of freshly stolen money.... " hey officers just doing a security test on the bank to make sure that other investors money is safe "  hahahahahah

Intention is impossible to prove, and you are seemingly willing to just give that a free pass. BUT OKAY we believe you haha

2 Examine the auction debacle next, I mean I am interested to see how you excuse THAT observable and undeniable act as not deception for direct financial gain.  I mean I don't even want a yes or no. I want a full set of excuses and a big story that demonstrates tman should not get negative trust, should be the most trusted member of the community ... can't wait.  How does this NOT meet the criteria for SCAMMING in your books??

3. When someone said to him previously -you can not give negative trust for a post presenting observable instances of laudas prior undeniable wrong doing -

Tman replied in black and white  " I can, I will and I just have... and if anybody does not like it....blah blah.

Explain how this does not fit with trust abuse and deliberately trying to silence whilstle blowing? therefore preventing other members having access to undeniable and proven financially motivated wrong doing of other members? therefore putting them at higher risk.

4. Tman includes the 2 other undeniable scammers Lauda and nutildah or has done until very very recently.


What reasoning did you employ to discount the extortion attempt so freely ? since those such as QS and I believe OG have confirmed after in depth investigation that this looks to be a very solid case. Of course their ACTIONS are undeniable only their intention seems to have been impossible to prove. Then again anyone can say ANYTHING is their intention can't they.

I mean you can say your INTENTION is to use the trust system to PROTECT other members from those PROVEN financially dangerous. However your actions certainly demonstrate the OPPOSITE is true.

If you dispute anything we have said DETAIL IT and then explain in detail WHY.

Read what we are asking you to provide clearly. 

Stop derailing and sidetracking we are investigating WHY you believe they should not have red trust or flags, and WHY you believe they should be the most trusted members of this forum even though there are UNDENIABLE observable events of financially motivated wrong doing that certainly are clear cut cases of SCAMMING in a directly financially dangerous way.

I mean later if you wish to "speculate" others are guilty of what you " believe" is possibly financially dangerous behaviors in the FUTURE. Is not reason to avoid answering the questions about the UNDENIABLE and observable ALREADY committed financially dangerous behaviors of your DT pals and inclusions.

Stop making yourself look even worse. It is as if you KNOW you are corrupt and your friends are clear scammers and you are deliberately trying to derail, create excuses.

We will slice through any excuses and derailing like butter.

OBSERVABLE UNDENIABLE FINANCIALLY DANGEROUS BEHAVIORS  OF THOSE YOU REFUSE TO GIVE RED TRUST TO AND INSTEAD CLAIM ARE THE MOST TRUSTED MEMBERS OF THE FORUM>>> THAT ALSO IN RETURN CLAIM THE SAME ABOUT YOU. 

Now get on with explaining in DETAIL why you concluded the extortion was OKAY, how the auction scamming is not auction scamming, and how the above trust abuse is not trust abuse. The DETAILS.  THE DETAILS on why you feel they are the most trust worthy people on the forum.













Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: suchmoon on November 05, 2019, 01:28:08 PM
Sir Care Bear, please don't take my merits as an encouragement to feed the troll. Unfortunately I can't merit an absence of posts so the next best thing is to merit a calm rational response.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: nutildah on November 05, 2019, 01:35:46 PM
tman and nutildah and xldiv   ALL SUPPORT EACH OTHER ON DT

https://media2.giphy.com/media/l49JQZDmz9PDTrXxu/giphy.gif

Sorry but that's the only line I actually read when scrolling through your latest monstrosity.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: xtraelv on November 05, 2019, 02:58:46 PM
WOW we really thought you would be running away by now, but we see you still left yourself a little excuse to run away at any time...the old still waiting for theymos to hold my hand. COME ON MAN UP ... you have come this far. You will stay until the end right??? or what excuse will you give for vanishing??

TOAA weaseling out of the agreement and gone back to being obnoxious.....what a surprise...yawn


So since we are claiming YOU are CORRUPT or that you are UNTRUSTWORTHY and that YOU are posing a DIRECT FINANCIAL danger to members by DELIBERATELY allowing your "friends and fellow DT scum" to Undeniably commit scamming or admitting they are willing to facilitate scamming for a PRICE and refuse to red trust them and EVEN SUPPORT THEM TO POSITIONS OF TRUST then you need to answer questions to demonstrate this is NOT TRUE.

Nope. I don't have to do anything. You have not kept your part of the agreement that we made.

I could easily do what you are doing.

I can claim you have kidnapped an invisible giraffe and starved it to death. Prove me wrong ! I can twist your words and eventually settle on that you insulted a cat and therefore you are still cruel to animals. I won't play that stupid game.



I will try to extrapolate your answers for the reader in red.


I gave the answers. You are just changing what I said.

Let me demonstrate the importance of emphasis and how easy it is to alter the meaning.

I never said you stole my money – I didn’t say it but I’m implying someone else may have.
I never said you stole my money – I am strongly objecting to the implication I accused you of stealing.
I never said you stole my money – I may not have said it, but I imply that I think it.
I never said you stole my money – I am not accusing you, but someone else has stolen my money.
I never said you stole my money – I don’t think you stole my money, but you did do something with it.
I never said you stole my money – You didn’t steal my money but I suggest you may have stolen someone else’s.
I never said you stole my money – You didn’t steal my money but I suggest you may have stolen something else.
https://factinator.com/i-never-said-she-stole-my-money/

You are clearly changing the emphasis, context and content of what I said while being rude and obnoxious. Doing so is outright dishonest.

https://i.imgur.com/JI9mHdw.png










<snip the bullshit>


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TMAN on November 05, 2019, 03:16:59 PM
I'd like to see an analysis by robovac or moon on how many merits TAA earns per word.. it has to be the lowest of all merit receivers, not per post but per individual words, with his walls of text and less merits than a 3rd world shitposting bounty hunter I believe this is firm proof of the cancer he/she/it writes to all other forum members.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 05, 2019, 04:15:44 PM
WOW we really thought you would be running away by now, but we see you still left yourself a little excuse to run away at any time...the old still waiting for theymos to hold my hand. COME ON MAN UP ... you have come this far. You will stay until the end right??? or what excuse will you give for vanishing??

TOAA weaseling out of the agreement and gone back to being obnoxious.....what a surprise...yawn


So since we are claiming YOU are CORRUPT or that you are UNTRUSTWORTHY and that YOU are posing a DIRECT FINANCIAL danger to members by DELIBERATELY allowing your "friends and fellow DT scum" to Undeniably commit scamming or admitting they are willing to facilitate scamming for a PRICE and refuse to red trust them and EVEN SUPPORT THEM TO POSITIONS OF TRUST then you need to answer questions to demonstrate this is NOT TRUE.

Nope. I don't have to do anything. You have not kept your part of the agreement that we made.

I could easily do what you are doing.

I can claim you have kidnapped an invisible giraffe and starved it to death. Prove me wrong ! I can twist your words and eventually settle on that you insulted a cat and therefore you are still cruel to animals. I won't play that stupid game.



I will try to extrapolate your answers for the reader in red.


RUNNING AWAY WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE spouting non related shit.... zooooooooooooom










<snip the bullshit>


If we cut away some part of your excuses and bullshit and extrapolated answers YOU DO NOT AGREE WITH then specifically mention them and explain yourself you big girl don't start crying and run away. If you had given straight answers to the questions instead of trying to bury any real answer into a ton of unrelated speculation and crap to justify your scammer supporting ways, then it would not be needed. NOT RUN AWAY

These are undeniable independently verifiable instances of tmans auction scamming you dumb fool. This is not claiming tman kidnapped a giraffe with no evidence?? are you high or just that dumb??

People can simply click the link and investigate this for themselves.

So stop RUNNING AWAY you pathetic little weasel..


EXAMINE THE AUCTION SCAMMING OBSERVABLE INSTANCE YOU SCUMBAG and present your set of excuses as to WHY it is not scamming and is not worthy of red trust and why you are including him as one of the most trust members of the forum.

GET ON WITH IT SCUMBAG.  I will be reminding you where it is on topic and relevant and within the rules forever that you have run away from giving your explanation because YOU KNOW you deliberately and knowingly abusing the trust system and your position on it.

Now present your explanation now you big girl. If you want theymos here to hold your hand get a PM or beg him in public to save you from further humiliation.

Your proven scammer buddies giving you merit for your shit post weaseling and giving yourself an excuse to RUN AWAY out of this are just demonstrating clearly how broken this entire shit show is and what a scammer supporter you are. A thread about you is coming shortly perhaps that will bring you back to debate your conduct here instead of refusing to answer why you are including undeniable scammers on DT.

HURRY UP.

LOL at tman - the tourettes fool believes although he can offer ZERO original thought inspiring posts when asked to, ZERO achievements of any note except UNDENIABLE auction scamming, extortion and UNDENIABLE trust abuse that he can use his BOGUS shitty merit score (went from hero LOLLOL to legend LOLOLOLOL in record time apparently hahahahahahhahah) in all his years here has just been a fucking shit stain on this entire board.

Please tourettes poet, never leave our threads. We want the dumbest undeniable scammers and their little girly bear pals here  24/7 on demand to bitch slap around at will. Keep plastering merit on scammer supporters who will not even DARE to present an explanation in your defense when forced to drill down... just runs away crying for daddy theymos to come and help him.

XLDIV gets more retarded each post. Observable undeniable instances of scamming = claiming someone has stolen a giraffe and has zero evidence but the fact they said they said they didn't like cats.

XXXXXXL DIV.


Still waiting for xldivs excuses and big story about other people that demonstrates tmans undeniable auction scamming is NOT SCAMMING and is reason for DT selection.  

Come on XLDIV let's hear the story and excuses and speculations , guesses and giraffe stories about others that excuse tmans undeniable auction scamming all.

we knew you would be running away, you have disappointed us further (didn't know that was possible).

Why XLDIV will you NOT DARE to present an explanation of the observable and verifiable auction scamming and explain why it is NOT SCAMMING and why you will not say it is financially high risk, give a red tag BUT WILL RATHER CLAIM HE IS ONE OF THE MOST TRUSTWORTHY MEMBERS OF THIS ENTIRE FORUM??

WHY ARE YOU RUNNING AWAY WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE goes XL div and the little bears. Probably finding some more little bears pics to hide behind.

I expect your explanation when I return scammer supporter. OR WILL YOU RUN AWAY..... or create a bunch of excuses and reasons you will not present your reasoning here?? 

After you present your reasoning on WHAT I AM ASKING YOU HERE. Then you can go back and CLEARLY EXPLAIN WHY THE ANSWERS WE EXTRAPOLATED are not the answers you agree with and then say WHY.










Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TMAN on November 05, 2019, 04:26:48 PM
Please tourettes poet, never leave our threads. We want the dumbest undeniable scammers and their little girly bear pals here  24/7 on demand to bitch slap around at will. Keep plastering merit on scammer supporters

whilst I may not of shoved a thesaurus up my backside whist cramming one in each ear and nostril whilst simultaneously deepthroating 2 of them I am 99% sure my IQ far surpasses yours. Proof being your posts over the last 12 months achieving nada other than you getting carpal tunnel and having 4300 TMAN/Lauda wanks.

you see young pajeet - JUST BECAUSE YOU SAY SOMETHING IT DOESN'T MAKE IT TRUE.

I am now 100% sure you were bullied as a child, or maybe it was some of that dodgy family rape. Whatever happened in your past to break you like this I am genuinely sorry that another human being can suffer from such narcissistic traits.

anyway princess I feel in my left testicle it is coming to the time I hit the ignore button again.

xxxx

 


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TheNewAnon135246 on November 05, 2019, 05:07:51 PM
According to several sources the average person types 40 words per minute. Assuming that CH is average, could someone scrape all of CH's posts and calculate how many hours he has wasted so far?
Even if you used 100 WPM, the conclusion is: Lifeless. This is a good job for Loyce, get right to it chap.

Loyce pointed to Suchmoon since he/she already scraped CH's posts at some point.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 05, 2019, 05:23:46 PM
Please tourettes poet, never leave our threads. We want the dumbest undeniable scammers and their little girly bear pals here  24/7 on demand to bitch slap around at will. Keep plastering merit on scammer supporters

whilst I may not of shoved a thesaurus up my backside whist cramming one in each ear and nostril whilst simultaneously deepthroating 2 of them I am 99% sure my IQ far surpasses yours. Proof being your posts over the last 12 months achieving nada other than you getting carpal tunnel and having 4300 TMAN/Lauda wanks.

you see young pajeet - JUST BECAUSE YOU SAY SOMETHING IT DOESN'T MAKE IT TRUE.

I am now 100% sure you were bullied as a child, or maybe it was some of that dodgy family rape. Whatever happened in your past to break you like this I am genuinely sorry that another human being can suffer from such narcissistic traits.

anyway princess I feel in my left testicle it is coming to the time I hit the ignore button again.

xxxx

 

dodgy family rape = the most reasonable explanation for presenting observable and undeniable instances of clear scamming  by TMAN , the DT and merit source and genius, hahaha  WELL ...ACCORDING TO TMAN anyway lol

Shhhhhh tman the auction scammer, extortionist, trust abuser, scammer supporter, tourettes poet  and genius. Keep your undeniable "claims" of proof that are laughable  to yourself.

If you need help swallowing a large thesaurus, then I would expect a few members would be willing to give you some help. Plenty of left testicles ready to generate the much needed lubricant haha

I am still waiting for your scammer supporting buddy to scratch his head and decide whether it is best to remain hidden and run away or think of some way to tell us all about how undeniable and verifiable instances of your auction scamming is BRILLIANT and shows clearly how you are one of the most trustworthy persons on the entire board. I mean that is before we start forcing him to accept all the other undeniably dirty shit you are either STRONGLY implicated in or observable and undeniably guilty of.

Your left testicle gives you warnings of when it is best to run and hide??? that is a handy feature for a scammer I guess... hahah okay.... bye bye tourettes poet. The lack of swearing lately is very disappointing, no recent obsession with foul smelling vaginas either :( no vegetable sex fantasies :(  but still the sexual deviance incest theme is running strong . That's a good sign. Hate to see you lose ALL of your entertainment value. Although boasting about your intelligence or even daring to mention it is a new source of fun.....hahahhahahhah

Hey Tman, can you present your 5 best original thought inspiring posts for us to analyse? or even some major achievements (not scamming or extortion thanks) in all the years that you have been here???

I mean when you have taken us off ignore so you can actually read since you will not be able to see this will you? then again you have put us on ignore and promised never to talk to us again quite a few times have you not?? LOL   ask theymos is your ignore button is broken?? not sure who to ask about your broken mind though? haha

Look forward to speaking to you again shortly ToughMAN .... well when you take us off ignore and forget about never speaking to us again.


Where is XLdiv that little wussy hiding, where has he run away too? ??  anyone seen XLDIV??  he must be writing a story about giraffes or perhaps a book of cat insults. That will be useful I guess now that the other pussy (and scammer) lauda is back.


THE OTHER BAD NEWS(for you guys) (other than XLDIV RUNNING AWAY CRYING unmasking himself as deliberate and willing scammer supporter unless he comes back and debunks that observable instance now that he is fully aware...)  is that the option of stopping the poll at 66 votes :(  be quick guys because 666 666 votes is going to be here and then you will have missed that one too. Sadly there is nothing in between.

Very encouraging all the participation though this week.  XLDIV the main driving force and source of much needed entertainment now that some other scammer supporters have run away and are in hiding.  Let's hope he was just bluffing about running back to mommy now that we asked him some questions and we made it clear we really want direct answers to THOSE questions not the ones he creates for himself.  

Where is that wussy? how long does it take to make up these funny excuses and stories about giraffes kidnapping cat insulters?

I don't even think agent foxpoop would accept that analogy it is just far too silly and unbelievable ..... where the fuck is that thread...I am going to find that this evening. I miss reading that one over and over.  The vile vixen is now  just hiding away giving out merits sadly rather than bringing their unique view on ....well everything really...haha


69 votes down, only another few 100k votes to go, if that is what we decide to go with.... In for the long haul as they say...


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Foxpup on November 05, 2019, 06:21:02 PM
I don't even think agent foxpoop would accept that analogy it is just far too silly and unbelievable ..... where the fuck is that thread...I am going to find that this evening. I miss reading that one over and over.  The vile vixen is now  just hiding away giving out merits sadly rather than bringing their unique view on ....well everything really...haha
Sorry, you were boring me by spouting the same nonsense over and over again. Anyway, can you prove you never kidnapped a giraffe? I want to see OBSERVABLE EVIDENCE!


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 05, 2019, 06:44:47 PM
I don't even think agent foxpoop would accept that analogy it is just far too silly and unbelievable ..... where the fuck is that thread...I am going to find that this evening. I miss reading that one over and over.  The vile vixen is now  just hiding away giving out merits sadly rather than bringing their unique view on ....well everything really...haha
Sorry, you were boring me by spouting the same nonsense over and over again. Anyway, can you prove you never kidnapped a giraffe? I want to see OBSERVABLE EVIDENCE!

Agent fox poop  LOL


Undeniable observable instances of financially motivated wrong doing by his friends and dt includes = nonsense says vile vixen. I like giving them merits though he says...

You have it the wrong way around agent foxpoop. You get the observable instances first. Then you can present it. How is this difficult to understand?

 are you foxpooping again??


Still waiting for XLdiv to come here and explain how tmans auction scamming is not bad at all and is not scamming but is rather a clear example of how suitable for default trust he is LOL

Sadly xldiv has run away  :(  running away food good?  or scratching his head pondering how to convert an undeniable scammer, trust abuser and extortionist (err undercover agent they claim), supporter of other undeniable scammers and scam facilitator for pay,  into a suitable default trust member  that stands up to public scrutiny .....hahaha



Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: o_e_l_e_o on November 05, 2019, 08:44:24 PM
My most recent venture in to the Fox's den has satisfied my masochistic tendencies for quite some time, and thus I cannot bring myself to actually read these walls of text.

Can I get a TL;DR for the last few pages?


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TheNewAnon135246 on November 05, 2019, 09:22:28 PM
My most recent venture in to the Fox's den has satisfied my masochistic tendencies for quite some time, and thus I cannot bring myself to actually read these walls of text.

Can I get a TL;DR for the last few pages?

TL;DR: verbal diarrhea. I muted him a long time ago so I'm guessing here.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 05, 2019, 09:42:16 PM
My most recent venture in to the Fox's den has satisfied my masochistic tendencies for quite some time, and thus I cannot bring myself to actually read these walls of text.

Can I get a TL;DR for the last few pages?

TL;DR: verbal diarrhea. I muted him a long time ago so I'm guessing here.

Typical shit post from this slobbering gambling sig spamming dirt bag.

TLDR = If this is too long of a summary for the last 2 pages of public humilation of XLDIV the scammer supporter then tough shit. Get back to spamming your gambling/mixing sigs elsewhere

xl divs pathetic excuses including the requirement of time travel and other such garbage = we crushed them.

xldiv was asked 3 clear questions apparently he is unhappy with the answers that we tried to extrapolate from his slobbering and moronic excuses, sidetracking and  irrelevant garbage. We thought he was saying what we have put in RED  he is unhappy with that apparently so his answers are in BLUE now.

1. Do you or have you in the last 3 months included on your trust list  lauda, tman or nutildah and do they include or have they included you in the last 3 months?  Please answer in full

tman and nutildah and xldiv   ALL SUPPORT EACH OTHER ON DT

2. Do you accept that the purpose of negative trust is to place a warning of " financially high risk" or  " scammer"  ( since those are the 2 messages you get at the top of your threads if you meet certain thresholds theymos has set here for negative trust (old system) or flags (new system)). This is the PRIME and central reason for the negative trust and flagging systems. These are clearly theymos's intentions since they are his own words on the warning banners?

We thought he was trying to say YES   Presumably then xldiv says NO because he claims he is not happy with our extrapolated answer but will not explain




3. Is someone that lies or intentionally  deceives others for their own direct financial gain ..  a scammer and financially high risk? yes or no?

we presumed he meant YES with lots of excuses and other blathering on.    Presumably then xldiv says NO because he claims he is not happy with our extrapolated answer but will not explain [/color]



XLdiv says presenting undeniable observable instances that are independently verifiable  = claiming someone stole and killed a giraffe when all the evidence they have is that insulted a cat.

XLdiv also is fully aware of the auction scamming of tman which he seem to not deny took place, is aware of the strong case of extortion but says he believes tman was just pretending to extort but was really under cover agent, is aware of the admission of tman for trust abusing whistle blowing on his scamming pal and DT include lauda, and is aware that Tman includes another confirmed scam facilitator nutildah , further he is aware TMAN includes XLdiv himself and has a clear motive for supporting scammers.  However, he says Tman is has not been financially high risk, does not deserve red trust or a flag, but rather is one of the most trusted members of the forum and should be on default trust.

If that is NOT what he is saying then we welcome XLDIV back here to detail which parts he DOES NOT AGREE WITH NOW...

OH YEAH, XLDIV HAS RUN AWAY because he claims getting his specious excuses and arguments correctly called out for scammer supporting and double standards garbage they are   is like being bested at chess by a pigeon apparently.



Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Lafu on November 05, 2019, 10:00:42 PM
If you only slightly the energy and the effort you would apply here with your countless and always the same contributions for more important things would help the forum more.
Always whining and complaining the same.
In the time you write you could also report 10 real spammers in different boards.

But your contribution to the forum is - 100 or pointless, nothing more.

And back on Ignore , you are a waste of Time.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: xtraelv on November 05, 2019, 11:17:35 PM
<snip>

Your accusations against Hilariousetc and Flying hellfish are as reliable as the accusation against you about kidnapping the invisible giraffe and starving it to death.

Photo of the missing giraffe:

https://i.imgur.com/hTKeRsX.png

Your homo-erotic fantasies involving bears is witnessed here:

https://i.imgur.com/QfxVTil.jpg



" that's it xldiv, keep ramming your face into his heel like that over and over" " that's it now you're almost unconscious and looking like you have been hit by a train , you are certainly winning, look at him not a single scratch"    the little bears chant...hahaha

WTF was going on in your head when you wrote that !!!???

https://i.imgur.com/YcqqnML.jpg

Proof of pleasuring yourself:


LOTS MORE COMING SOON


Insults to cats here:

Well, where does one start with this filth bag.

In the meantime - not one denial about the kidnapped invisible giraffe. You've had ample time to deny it and didn't- surely that is plenty of proof of guilt ! It must have pleasured you when you buried the corpse - you sick fuck !

Were you aroused when you buried the the corpse - yes or no ? (This is a yes or no answer question only ! Everything else will be ignored)

In addition to that you have tagged no scammers what-so-ever or excluded any scammers from your trust list. You are the most corrupt of all ! By your own logic you support every scammer that has ever been on this forum !


On a more serious note:

I debunked it here and proved you made untruthful accusations and attempted to censor comments you didn't like:

It shows a complete lack of understanding of the processes here:

After marking bad our reports from this thread ranging from -

1. telling people not to reply on thread and ADMITTING they never read the initial post
2. making false accusations
3. admitting they don't read the OP before making random insults
4. strange speculation on what we look like (suchmoon taking her wig off to post a picture of herself)


Three (2-3-4) of those things you mentioned are not breaking the rules.

If (1) you bait someone with insults but create a local rule stating that they cannot reply it is very likely that it will not be enforced.

Reporting someone for those things is called attempted censorship

You'd know that if you had read the rules. Very important: If you report someone for breaking the rules - make sure it is a rule

If it is not a rule - then it is a false report.


Q: Why haven't you banned <insert scammer username here> who is an obvious scammer?
A: Possible (or real, not for me to decide) scams are not moderated to prevent moderator abuse. If we start picking out which ones we call "scammers" and ban, we would make a lot of decisions based on biased opinions.

Q: Do you moderate/delete (possible) FUD, accusations and untrue information?
A: No. We don't have enough time to check every single piece of information and verify the validity of the sources. Also, just like scams - too much room for bias and abuse.

However, trolling isn't allowed. If a user is habitually posting obviously false nonsense ("obviously false nonsense" to an outsider, NOT to someone who follows or is involved in the discussion) just to stir up trouble, then it's considered trolling, which is prohibited. Such cases should be thoroughly documented in the report though (There are tons of reports that just say "trolling", but moderators don't have time to look through each user's post).

Q: Someone insulted me. Why aren't you deleting his post/thread?
A: Possible (since we don't have the time or resources to check) insults are also allowed as long as they contain any kind of constructive opinion, info or something else substantial and aren't off-topic. For example, posting something like "you are dumb" will be deleted as it contains no meaningful content. However, if the post is somewhere along the lines of "You are dumb. This is wrong because this website/thread/etc. has explained it's not right", it's in most cases accepted.

Unofficial list of (official) Bitcointalk.org rules, guidelines, FAQ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.msg7955645#msg7955645)



So our DT has been taken over by a bunch of people that are OBSERVABLY DIRTY.

Most of the people on your list were on DT already with the old system.
There are currently 100 DT1 of which 3 are excluded. There are many more DT2
So it hasn’t been “taken over”.

1. They mostly all cycle merit to each other

None of the people in the OP have any benefit from receiving merit. They all had Legendary or Hero accounts when merit was introduced.

Some of them are merit sources and by giving merit to people whose judgement they trust it is spread to other users via the sMerit system. The way it was designed.

A legendary account receiving merit = no benefit.
Receiving more than 1000 merit = no benefit to recipient.

2. They mostly  all vote to include each other on DT (via their foolishly given right to be the ones to decide on WHOM is eligible for DT)

That is way the system is supposed to work.  People vote for people that they trust. There were no instant changes but I worked hard to ensure that DT’s were endorsed in the Russian and Turkish communities. Local knowledge and native language speakers from different countries greatly assist in detecting scams and cultural understanding and diversity.
Both Tman and Lauda listened to what I had to say and both modified their viewpoints but
I also recognize that they also have the right to have a different opinion than me.

I have not seen any evidence that the majority of people (excluding spam and alt accounts) disagree with the selection of DT. Only a small minority voices disagreement. Some refer to themselves in plural format and some of them are alts.

This is a good start.

The Russian locale is quite upset with what they consider manipulation of the DT system.

They believe what they did is consistent with what Theymos instructed:

TMAN, you're coming across as a real asshole here. AFAICT, that topic is highly analogous to the English discussions. The main addition is that they're looking to get more local representation in DT1, which is very reasonable. I'd prefer if people not treat trust lists as an election, but if I had wanted nobody to ever think/talk/strategize about how trust lists affect DT1 selection, I would've kept the DT1 criteria secret.

They quickly found a quote from me where I previously documented that usernames starting with tildes are handled:
"If you want to trust someone whose name begins with a tilde, prefix their name with a backslash."   тe ecли вы xoтитe выcкaзaть дoвepиe юзepy ~XXX  в cвoй cпиcoк пpямoгo дoвepия зaпишитe \~XXX, ecли жe вы xoтитe выcкaзaть eмy нeдoвepиe зaпишитe ~\~XXX.
So they knew right away that the ~DefaultTrust account was harmless.

I see nothing concerning with xandry's actions there. Nothing there comes close to warranting deletion. Even if someone was openly talking about trying to form a strategic DT1 manipulation group for the express purpose of undermining the system, such a topic should not be deleted; rather, I'd look to handle this within the DT1 selection criteria.

While I don't understand Russian that well and I am not that often on their pages I have been chatting with a couple of the people involved.

I'd like to see this de-escalate. For the sake of everyone involved.

I do think that some Russian members have been treated unfairly. For instance for being tagged for merely posting in a thread that according to Theymos is their right to do.

What you are complaining about is exactly how the system is supposed to work.


3. They mostly all seem to be creaming off the best paying (in btc) sig spots via their pals who are campaign managers.

I’ve never participated in a signature or bounty campaign. I don’t like signature campaigns and recently when I audited a signature campaign it became apparent just how prominent spam and bounty scammers are.

I imagine that a reputable bounty or sig manager will give preference to people who they know to be reliable posters.

Being a business they have the right to choose who represents them.  
Anyone can become a bounty manager.

4. The central cluster of Dirty Turds also seem to exclude the same people from dt.

That is because they don’t trust those people. Local rules you made prevent discussing those people individually.

Local rules - this is a discussion regarding the observable instances of DT members engaging in clearly negative and untrustworthy behaviors only. Those on default trust DT1 DT2 DT3 may be discussed and nobody else

5. They will use the "TRUST" system to punish whistle blowing of their prior observable wrong doing.

There is a right and wrong way to approach a situation. If you are relatively unknown and use abusive and emotive language to attack a prominent forum member using a method that does not follow the normal protocols then it is likely that that person will be ignored or ostracised.
That is how social norms work. Those that yell and shout abuse at those that enforce the rules generally get cast out.



Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 06, 2019, 12:02:06 AM

DELIBERATELY AND BLATANTLY trying to divert and side track from presenting his reasoning on

Why XLDIV will you NOT DARE to present an explanation of the observable and verifiable auction scamming and explain why it is NOT SCAMMING and why you will not say it is financially high risk, give a red tag BUT WILL RATHER CLAIM HE IS ONE OF THE MOST TRUSTWORTHY MEMBERS OF THIS ENTIRE FORUM??




So although you seem to have just avoided presenting what we asked for .... and thrown in a bunch of nonsense that we will take apart piece by piece AFTER this examination of your actions and behaviors that are clearly ENABLING, SUPPORTING, AND BENEFITING from UNDENIABLE SCAMMERS.

Now BACK TO WHAT WE ASKED YOU PLEASE... YOUR REASONING AND EXPLANATION behind you including on DT an Undeniable SCAMMER (with other undeniable financially high risk behaviors and abuses)

Why XLDIV will you NOT DARE to present an explanation of the observable and verifiable auction scamming and explain why it is NOT SCAMMING and why you will not say it is financially high risk, not give a red tag/flag  BUT WILL RATHER CLAIM HE IS ONE OF THE MOST TRUSTWORTHY MEMBERS OF THIS ENTIRE FORUM??

STOP RUNNING AWAY from this EXPLANATION WE ARE ASKING FOR.

HURRY UP SCAMMER SUPPORTER or you will be on the dirty turds thread and have your own dedicated thread soon detailing all of these stupid excuses and now the RUNNING AWAY from presenting your reasoning on rewarding scammers and rather than punishing them.

YOU ARE ENDANGERING OTHER MEMBERS by doing so.  KNOWINGLY SUPPORTING SCAMMERS is  VERY UNTRUSTWORTHY and FINANCIALLY HIGH RISK BEHAVIOR.

HURRY UP SCAMMER SUPPORTER.

xtraelv-SCAMMER-SUPPORTER ... that is soon how you will be branded. The evidence is undeniable.

Tman is undeniably an auction scammer - You are undeniably supporting him on DT and CLAIMING his undeniable scamming is not  SCAMMING AT ALL, and rather  that he should be rewarded with a DT position and no red trust at all.  I mean we have not even got started with the extortion, trust abuse and supporting other undeniable scammers.... also the small issue of them supporting you on dt and your actions. We want to take you step by step explaining your reasoning on each and every part of it all. So we can see why you claim no tag or flag is suitable and rather they are the most trusted members here.

ALL is UNDENIABLE the observable instances are there and fully verifiable by any member. Go research folks.

Any further attempt to just derail this to... homo erotica of small bears, giraffe kidnapping and burial, hilarious and co's marking as BAD posts that simply state " shut up you used tampon" , or ton of other shit you are trying to derail with will NOT WORK. But is good filler for your new thread.

We will keep asking you to present your explanation and reasoning on you believing scamming people in auctions is not financially high risk behavior and is rather a good idea to include such people on Default trust and CLAIM IN YOUR OWN WORDS those actions do not deserve a tag or any punishment

LOL

STOP RUNNING AWAY FROM OUR QUESTIONS AND MAKING THIS ABOUT OTHER MODERATION ISSUES or anything else you are trying to hide behind weasel.

Pathetic sneaky little scam supporting weasel thought it could talk it's way out of being outed as an dirty scum bag scammer supporter.

Now get back to telling us YOUR VERSION OF THE AUCTION SCAMMING ...... and how it does not meet your standards for red trust or any punishment but is obvious and natural behavior of someone who is the MOST TRUSTED on the entire forum. hahah

We can't wait. MAKE IT A GREAT STORY PLEASE >>> you best excuses, best convoluted reasoning, best bear pics, best derailing, best scammer supporting tactics so we can pull them all to pieces over and over. All good filler for the bumps on your own personal thread.... Yummy.

xtraelv-scammer-supporter  = our current fav scammer supporting bitch to slap around with observable and undeniable instances of his own scammer supporting actions.  Almost as good as nutildah. He is doing what a lot of scammers do, they try to defend their actions but actually end up clearly demonstrating it was deliberate and willful. Just like nutildah actually. Like lauda too, I mean tman was always going to fuck up anyway and leave no room for deniability. I mean notice how tman is here on this thread and is not even disputing his auction scamming..... hahahaha

HURRY UP.


At least you have not run away from the thread ( that would be terrible) but how much more you can humiliate yourself before you run away we are not sure.
How much more of a public thrashing can your scamming supporting mind take?

Confess now that  it is impossible for you to spin his undeniable scamming into anything but undeniable scamming, ...be sensible ..no amount of sidetracking or derailing will stop us pressing for this to be answered, then onto the next points we have ready for you. We can hardly wait.

Do yourself a favor , check the initial post, investigate ALL the observable instances and then try again. Perhaps start excluding undeniable scammers, red trusting them and making sure you don't get pressured or tempted into being a scammer supporter in the future.  There's a good little bear.

How about that? ....













Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: suchmoon on November 06, 2019, 12:44:22 AM
Wow, caps, bold, underlined, red text - I haven't seen cryptohunter so agitated in a long time. Goes to show how little attention is needed to keep him happy - just someone replying to him is enough. Doesn't even matter much what's inside those replies, he's gonna make it mean anything he wants.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: xtraelv on November 06, 2019, 12:49:25 AM

DELIBERATELY AND BLATANTLY trying to divert and side track from presenting his reasoning on

Why XLDIV will you NOT DARE to present an explanation of the observable and verifiable auction scamming and explain why it is NOT SCAMMING and why you will not say it is financially high risk, give a red tag BUT WILL RATHER CLAIM HE IS ONE OF THE MOST TRUSTWORTHY MEMBERS OF THIS ENTIRE FORUM??



Don't attribute things to me that I did not say. Learn how to use quotes properly.



Tman is undeniably an auction scammer

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1931778.msg19286369#msg19286369

People can read the comment and judge for themselves.
Commenting on an auction is not auction scamming.

If I had to tag every shill on this site I'd have no life left.

In some countries vendor bidding is allowed. (Although bidding on your own auctions I find scammy)

Some of the old DT's have some bad habits. By setting a good example those bad habits  -or those that continue with those bad habits will disappear over time.

Some of the old DT's also have an invaluable amount of knowledge and skill.

The only person running away is you. Your posts consists of insults and assertions of your preconceived ideas You don't answer any questions or directly reply to any points made.

You may produce walls of words but you don't participate in any discussion. You don't interact - you just throw words at people.

You don't understand the rules (proven)
You don't understand how the trust system works (proven)
You don't understand how merits work (proven)
You don't know how to look up information on this site (proven)

It is just plain lazy. You demand and expect people to act as your unpaid servants. Take initiative and learn how things work before complaining about them or participate in the conversation by listening. Stop ranting and read what I've actually said with an open mind. You might learn something.

You can continue with your ranting and raving but it is your loss. The only one you are deluding with your nonsense is yourself and perhaps one or two others.

You don't address any of the points I've made - including the guidelines set by the forum administrator.

You are talking at me. You should be talking to me and listening to me. That is how normal people communicate.

I believe my moderate views and rational discussion has resulted in others taking on some more moderate views as well. The people I respect the most on this forum and whose views are most in line with mine are Suchmoon and Hilariousetc. If you categorize me the same as them then I have no problem with that.

I've proven that you don't understand the forum rules and try to censor people. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5181848.msg52988346#msg52988346)

It also appears that you are unable to justify your conduct or position given the guidelines provided by Theymos. So you are attempting to hide it by hurling insults and distracting from the reply. Literally burying the evidence in bullshit birdshit.

https://i.imgur.com/ZoWfO54.png


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 06, 2019, 01:37:37 AM

deliberately deceiving people for personal financial gain is NOT SCAMMING... it is simply making commments........ err that deceive people for direct personal financial gain .... err yep that's it what is it is alright...

anyway sometimes scammers ...errr I mean people that make COMMENTS have lots of useful knowledge so that also makes it okay too... .ask suchmoon and hilarious and co....  they support scammers ...errr people that make deceive other members whilst silencing other members to run their CONs and scams.

btw here is a picture of a car with bird poo and also you were proven wrong about some other things that I will try to derail with but sadly I will not be able to prove that when it come time for the scrutiny.

love
scammer supporter xtraelv, and acolyte of suchselfdebunker and hilarious mod.



LOL  Tman was NOT SCAMMING on that auction folks, he was simply commenting.  hahahahahahahahhahahahha

Passing the BUCK TO SUCHMOON AND HILARIOUS AND CO.... that probably is NOT WISE.

scamming = lying or deliberately deceiving people for personal financial gain or attempted gain.

Now go read the entire auction thread and ALL of what OG nasty presented as undeniable observable instances as it REALLY HAPPENED.

Then tell me again this is NOT SCAMMING this is just COMMENTING on the auction.  

REMEMBER THIS IS TMANS COIN HE GETS HIS PAL TO AUCTION FOR HIM WHILST HE DECEIVES AND TRIES TO INFLUENCE THE AUCTION, REMEMBER OG AT THE TIME DOES NOT EVEN KNOW THIS IS TMANS SECRET AUCTION...  

Look how he tries to deceive as the natural price the auction is reaching the price HE WANTS IT TO..

"wow this has to be a record low for a sub #100 serial. if I didn't have so many I would be snapping this up"  

record low price....I would be snapping this up if I did not have so many???  it's his coin the scamming little shit.

NOW LOOK at his reaction when a member gives their honest opinion on the price and the investment potential of TMANS coin he is PRETENDING he would buy  LOL FROM HIMSELF if he did not already have so many.

Now look at him trying to SILENCE OGNASTY just for giving an opinion that these types of coin TMAN is pretending he would buy from himself...lol if he did not have so many??

Og says he thinks people should really get rid of them since already they are overvalued.  HONEST ADVICE TO INVESTORS LOOKING AT THE AUCTION.

Tman says then goes into a frenzy of personal attacks and other nasty insults JUST TO SILENCE HIM AND PUNISH HIM FOR GIVING an honest opinion.

READ THE ENTIRE THREAD, with the full knowledge this is tmans coins he is getting his friend to auction for him. I mean this is undeniable SCAMMING.

Now we have that if you scam using words  YOU ARE JUST COMMENTING.

hahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

I'm clearly saying xtraelv is a scammer supporter and making ANY excuses he can ..... he says this is the behavior of someone that he claims is one of the MOST TRUSTWORTHY people on the board and not a financial danger at all.  That is just that single incident....without tman being strongly implicated in extortion , supporting other undeniable scammers and willing scam facilitators and ADMITTING TRUST ABUSING THOSE WHO DARE PRESENT OBSERVABLE INSTANCES OF THEIR SCAMMING BEHAVIORS.

It is undeniable now that xtraelv is a scammers supporter. He is now claiming that he is influenced by suchmoon and hilarious and co. So this is supposed to take the responsibility of being a scammer supporter from his hands??? is that right??

So the undeniable evidence of tman scamming there is NOT scamming and is just comments is that what you are claiming?? there is no attempted deception for financial gain there from TMAN you say xtraelv .... I want to hear you say it.

Tman is scamming there  - YES OR NO FFS.

Hurry up you cowardly little snake.

This is merely the first fun stage. We will make a compilation of your finest statements here for your own personal thread.  This is just the start.

Do not run away now, you have come way too far.  

Tman himself does not deny the scamming...... hahahahahha or does he??? where is the undeniable scamming little tourettes poet???

ONCE YOU ARE PROVEN A SCAMMER SUPPORTER that simply opens up a huge new debate on meta.

IF A DT MEMBER IS SHOWN UNDENIABLE EVIDENCE OF SCAMMING (EVEN THE SCAMMER DOES NOT DENY IT AND OFFER AN ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATION) and they willfully and deliberately refuse to tag or flag, and even insist on claiming they are the most trusted members on this forum. THEN WHAT action should be taken by theymos??? I mean surely he can not allow DT members to openly say " welll yes my fellow dt pals which mutually include me are undeniable scammers I do not refute that, but we will just allow each other to scam whilst punishing other members for crimes that are NOT UNDENIABLE and there is not concrete evidence. Whilst we mostly all make sure we take the highest paying rev streams here and crush free speech.

I mean you are not denying it is scamming and just comments made to deceive for financial gain are you???? I mean is this the salty spittoon approach where you just now try to change the universally accepted definition of words??

Tman was not scamming by deceiving people for his own financial gain says xtraelv... NO scamming, just pure default trust worthy behavior. Perfect for the default trust CV.

I know , what if he was simply testing the auction process out?? Yes that could be it, he was looking for flaws and possible ways to scam people during the auction process here, and was going to reveal to others how it is done? kinda like the secret agents thing with the extortion??  that sounds kind reasonable right?? i mean it worked once??

Perhaps he is testing out the trust system??? this is it , he is infiltrating it and he lauda and owlcatz are giving red trust to whistle blowers for reporting on their scamming (which they are faking to make it all seem more real) then when you and others start supporting their scamming ways, voting them on to dt, and accepting their inclusions to secure the top rev streams............THEY ARE GOING TO DO A BIG REVEAL... super secret agents and pull the rug on all you REAL SCAMMERS AND FINANCIALLY DANGEROUS SCUM who would think to support and enable such scamming for your own ends.

This is brilliant secret agents scheme.....perhaps that is your next excuse?? although make sure you mention you were one of the secret agents too and fully complicit just to create a more convincing honey pot trap??

hahahahahahahahahahahahahhah

So your final word on this opening part of the analysis of your use of default trust is that you can deliberately deceive people for financial gain, and silence those that dare to give their honest opinions to other victims of the deception, to give the best chance of getting max gains of out of the CON... and so long as you only use words, then that is " JUST MAKING COMMENTS"  and not scamming at all in your opinion, and since suchmoon and hilarious are supporting undeniable scammers you feel that helps matters for you??

YES OR NO that is what you are saying??


Congratulations the first DT to claim that if you undeniably scam people using words, that is simply commenting when his DT pals do it.

Other members though... don't attempt this " just commenting or just using words" defense, xtraelv-scammer-supporter may not accept that moronic excuse.

How does it feel to be a scammer supporter and revealed like this piece by piece??  This is just the very start, as we heap on MORE undeniable evidence it starts to get even more fun (for us).

Don't run away at this point,  we need you to stay here and finish this, then after we come and you can help us humiliate you over your other "proven" points. We will not be without you from now on. Which time zone are you scammer supporting on these days, we must have someone here full time to help you help us.

The xtraelv and the " it is only comments " defense. That can be applied by undeniable scammers nicely I think all over the board. You can support them all on DT and protect them against red trust and flags. You will are super net positive for this forum.














Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: xtraelv on November 06, 2019, 02:03:53 AM

It is undeniable now that xtraelv is a scammers supporter.

You've repeatedly said that all along. If it is undeniable then why are we even talking ? You are wasting my time.

What is undeniable is that you did not keep to the agreement to get Theymos to be an arbitrator and used every excuse not to follow through with it.
 
This is merely the first fun stage. We will make a compilation of your finest statements here for your own personal thread.  This is just the start.

Whatever. You were always going to do that anyway.

I'm sure you will arrange it in a false and defamatory way so it says what you want it to say and obscure what I actually said.

https://i.imgur.com/JI9mHdw.png


OH YEAH, XLDIV HAS RUN AWAY because he claims getting his specious excuses and arguments correctly called out for scammer supporting and double standards garbage they are   is like being bested at chess by a pigeon apparently.


It appears you have taken it as a compliment.  ;D


FYI - It appears that most of the references and information is probably too difficult for you to understand. I post it so anyone rational reading it has an understanding of the issues and logic followed.

If you vote for a politician to trust you don't necessarily agree with all of their conduct or decisions. You choose them because you think they can do the job well. Same applies with DT.

I've long ago realized that "The One Above All"  is just another way of saying "Angry delusional pigeon flying overhead with chronic diarrhea".


https://i.imgur.com/6oqLshM.png


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 06, 2019, 02:39:31 AM

I refuse to confirm tman is scamming there when clearly I know he is or I would answer yes or no.

I am now going to cry for theymos again.

I am an undeniable scammer supporter but since I will not confirm it in my own words and refuse to answer yes or no ... that somehow helps  I think.

I have run out of little bear pics.

I'm sure you will present observable and undeniable instances in a way me and my scamming pals will call defamatory when it is just the truth.

You will never obscure what I have said as well as I have done good luck TOAA,

IF PEOPLE UNDENIABLY SCAM BUT I CAN CLAIM THEY DO OTHER THINGS I APPROVE OF THEN I CAN PUT THEM ON DT IF I WANT AND IF THEY WANT TO IN RETURN PUT ME ON DT THAT IS COOL WITH ME.  HOPEFULLY THERE IS A FEW OF THEM SO IT IS WORTH WHILE.

You are angry for no reason and talk the truth about your trust abusers far too much. I mean those who simply make comments to attempt to prevent you whistle blowing on them.



Last chance to give your straight answer. Now review the auction thread thoroughly and the OGnasty account where tman confirmed it was his coin to him later,  and tell me is tman scamming there yes or no?

You have read the admission by TMAN RIGHT ???

Admission it was his auction:
"Dude I haven't crossed paths with OG in over 6 months, it wasn't until he derailed my auction hosted by MJ that this kicked off."
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1946142.msg19349060#msg19349060 "

Have a long hard look at it.

YES OR NO? please see how crazy it is to deny it in public, and simply call it commenting. Please help yourself here.

Last chance or you will NEVER LIVE THIS MOMENT DOWN, it is far worse that the foxpooping and SS (well perhaps) it could compare to the suchmoron self debunking and ludicrous statements ... "I'll make you famous"..

JUST COMMENTS scamming defense will be synonymous with you, whilst crying for theymos to bail you out..... we almost feel guilty and actually do just a little bit. Stop forcing us to do this to you. Do you really want to be in the spot light of blatant deliberate scammer supporting FOREVER??

Let it all be over now, and you can go hold your head up and not be looking for us over your shoulder laughing in your face, where it is ontopic and relevant for the rest of your time here. You are simply constructing your own demise. Time to leave your admiration of bad boys and join the good guys. You know the ones that are scamming people for financial gain??

The " xtraelv ONLY COMMENTS" defense for all undeniable scammers ( ON DT ONLY OF COURSE) . You will remembered for this more than any other thing here period. Each time it will pull in tman and the rest of this. We are like the real default trust hahaha

This is simply for the good of all members here, we are protecting the honest members against scammers and scammer supporters.

We will ONLY present observable instances, when they are on topic and relevant.

NOT SCAMMING - THESE ARE JUST COMMENTS.

Come on supporting undeniable scammers is only a temp benefit, you are destroying your entire future here. This is all being recorded for us to pull up at any time we like.  You know we like ... So you think suchmounds is hot, you think hilarious and co is all powerful....we get it .... but is it worth it??

Is tman scamming there in that auction...YES OR NO.??  very last chance  at this answer. Consider carefully if that is JUST COMMENTS??

WE ONLY WANT YES OR NO - you have had a chance to give sensible direct answer you keep trying anything to avoid.

Now we just want the truth please.... you can come to your very own compilation thread later if that suits you better? the one where it is all about you , observable instances ONLY. Your quotes, your excuses , your own " ONLY COMMENTS DEFENSE " of undeniable scamming, not even denied by the scammer himself because it is there clear in black and white.

I mean there is yet another level left.... you must accept it meets the criteria of scamming there is no other real choice. Then as you have already started preparing the SCAMMERS CAN BE ON DT AND NOT HAVE RED TRUST ....because .... err reasons debate.... perhaps you have more up your sleeve for that part.

Stop forcing your face into our heel on this undeniable instance..... there is no worse position than freezing the debate here for you. Accept that and concede.
You are humiliating yourself by squirming at this part. There is no point defending a position like this. Move to another position you "MAY" do better there.

Just say okay okay tman was scamming there on that auction I admit it was more than JUST COMMENTING like anyone can he is a scammer... but but but....then you bring in the politician that is great at all those other things you were starting to introduce.... we would like to move on. The more material we have for your thread the better.  Don't want you giving up at this very early stage.

Do not run away now, that would be crazy after all of your hard work. You have more balls ( and less brains) than 90% of the weasels that would have bailed on this point by now and hit the ignore button. We are pleased you are not that kind of pussy and weasel. Full credits for trying your very best to defend scammers and support their scamming actions as default trust worthy. You are a scammer supporting hero no doubt. I have no doubt legendary scammer supporter is really more appropriate. I will lobby theymos to add that extra text on your account for your undeniable contribution to scammers. THE xtraelv ONLY COMMENTS DEFENSE.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: xtraelv on November 06, 2019, 03:00:39 AM
Any further attempt to just derail this to... homo erotica of small bears, giraffe kidnapping and burial, hilarious and co's marking as BAD posts that simply state " shut up you used tampon" , or ton of other shit you are trying to derail with will NOT WORK. But is good filler for your new thread.

1) Where did you prove it was Hilarious&co that marked it as bad ?
2) It is clearly stated that:
Q: Someone insulted me. Why aren't you deleting his post/thread?
A: Possible (since we don't have the time or resources to check) insults are also allowed as long as they contain any kind of constructive opinion, info or something else substantial and aren't off-topic. For example, posting something like "you are dumb" will be deleted as it contains no meaningful content. However, if the post is somewhere along the lines of "You are dumb. This is wrong because this website/thread/etc. has explained it's not right", it's in most cases accepted.
Quote
shut up you used tampon
was actually good advise. You should learn to shut up. "Used tampon" should not be taken literally - it is an insult.

 You have claimed he didn’t enforce rules - rules that are actually don't exist. (The invisible giraffe) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5181848.msg52988346#msg52988346) You didn’t present any verifiable evidence directly implicating Hilarious. (no proof of killing)

The only thing you can prove is that he has publicly ridiculed and insulted you, yourself and your alt.
(insulting the cat)

The reason I used an absolutely ridiculous analogy is because you are dishonest enough to try and use it as anything other than an analogy if I used a more realistic example.

So enough delays - last chance to answer the questions so I can write a far more entertaining piece of fiction than what you are going to write :

Were you aroused when you buried the the corpse of the kidnapped invisible giraffe ? - yes or no ? (This is a yes or no answer question only ! Everything else will be ignored)

Your homo erotica involving small bears witnessed by everyone on here. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170789.msg52979547#msg52979547) Were they midgets or underage ? (Choose one or both of the two)

Failing to answer immediately will be considered an undisputed, undeniable admission of guilt.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 06, 2019, 03:36:16 AM
Any further attempt to just derail this to... homo erotica of small bears, giraffe kidnapping and burial, hilarious and co's marking as BAD posts that simply state " shut up you used tampon" , or ton of other shit you are trying to derail with will NOT WORK. But is good filler for your new thread.

1) Where did you prove it was Hilarious&co that marked it as bad ?
2) It is clearly stated that:
Q: Someone insulted me. Why aren't you deleting his post/thread?
A: Possible (since we don't have the time or resources to check) insults are also allowed as long as they contain any kind of constructive opinion, info or something else substantial and aren't off-topic. For example, posting something like "you are dumb" will be deleted as it contains no meaningful content. However, if the post is somewhere along the lines of "You are dumb. This is wrong because this website/thread/etc. has explained it's not right", it's in most cases accepted.
Quote
shut up you used tampon
was actually good advise. You should learn to shut up.

 You have claimed he didn’t enforce rules - rules that are actually don't exist. (The invisible giraffe) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5181848.msg52988346#msg52988346) You didn’t present any verifiable evidence directly implicating Hilarious. (no proof of killing)

The only thing you can prove is that he has publicly ridiculed and insulted you, yourself and your alt.
(insulting the cat)

The reason I used an absolutely ridiculous analogy is because you are dishonest enough to try and use it as anything other than an analogy if I used a more realistic example.

So enough delays - last chance to answer the questions so I can write a far more entertaining piece of fiction than what you are going to write :

Were you aroused when you buried the the corpse of the kidnapped invisible giraffe ? - yes or no ? (This is a yes or no answer question only ! Everything else will be ignored)

Your homo erotica involving small bears witnessed by everyone on here. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170789.msg52979547#msg52979547) Were they midgets or underage ? (Choose one or both of the two)

Failing to answer immediately will be considered an undisputed, undeniable admission of guilt.

Quoting entire post as it is , just to demonstrate the scared little pussy xtraelv  REFUSES TO ANSWER THE QUESTION AS TO WHETHER TMAN WAS scamming on that auction thread or not.

What a scammer supporting scumbag. There really can be no clearer example of trying to avoid, derail, divert, and detract from answering that simple question.

This is going to be a brilliant rep thread for us so much material here. It is almost like a nutildah like trap he has put himself inside.

There is NO ESCAPE now from the term scammer supporter. This filthy dirty scammer supporting piece of shit is clearly defending scamming and giving all scammers on this board the opportunity to ridicule and laugh at DT and all authority here on this forum.

The FACT you refuse to answer yes or no was tman scamming in that auction but STILL include him on default trust and still say his undeniable scamming does not require a tag or flag is DISGUSTING. We will see to it this follows you around as any honest member who cares to see honest members protected from such untrustworthy and financially dangerous individuals will do.

We will make sure he has his own thread containing ALL the observable excuses, and faux defenses he tries to use to protect his scamming DT colluders.
It will be kept updated and your deliberate and willful supporting and defending of undeniable scammers will be linked to every post where it is ON TOPIC and RELEVANT.  

We will soon come to the thread and debunk all your other specious and low functioning spew. You are going to become one of our favorite bitches here xtraelv scammer supporter and colluder.

 We have demonstrated you are willingly and deliberately supporting undeniable scammers and will not even deny it in public with any kind of reasoning that stands up to mild scrutiny.

Fine you are a CONFIRMED scammers supporter now. You will not deny he was scamming there and you support him on DT and claim he is one of the most trustworthy people here, you claim his undeniable scamming is not worthy or red trust of a flag even.

Well done xldiv you just destroyed your own reputation.  The xtraelv-scammer-supporting-Just-comments-defense. This can be deployed in tons of fun places where it is on topic and relevant.  Brilliant fun coming our way hahah

Sorry for not indulging your kidnapping giraffes theory, perhaps when you present observable instances that demonstrate that it is undeniable that I did kidnap a giraffe I may indulge you further. For now that avenue of derailing desperate garbage is being closed down.

Although you are now a observable scammer supporter, we will still come at some stage to the appropriate thread to crush your moronic blathering and slobbering for some merit or favor scraps from your idols here (we prefer scammers AND THEIR PERSONAL DEDICATED THREADS to corrupt moderation but if the pickings are slim and the cowards in dt are hiding away you may get some further public thrashings from us) . What a sad pathetic little scammer supporting dreg you are. I would be ashamed to have you as an admirer ...YUCK.  Then again suchmoobs can't be so picky so she is likely happy to have such an energetic little scammer supporters behind her. Just look out if she starts toppling backwards. That is dangerous for little weak pussy's like you. She needs a real man or beast wrestler.... hahah

FICTION YOU SAY?? we will present only independently verifiable instances of truth about you DON'T WORRY. The DT's would be all over us for presenting anything other than the truth..........oh wait...no that's not how it works, they scream defamation when you tell the truth or ask questions regarding their observable behaviors they don't even deny...hahaha  - -

Anyway thanks for confirming you support undeniable scammers and place them on DT.  It has been fun. Stay with us though because we like all the bumps and attention our thread can get.  Although we have a nice new thread to focus on now. I think you will want to join us there too so that produces the max warning to the max amount of honest members before you support scammers who will scam them.

xtraelv bitcointalks finest scammer supporter, the only one that will stick around and demonstrate without doubt he is knowingly and deliberately supporting financially high risk scammers scam bitcointalks honest members from their entrenched default trust positions. What a net positive member we have here.



Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: xtraelv on November 06, 2019, 04:08:53 AM

So enough delays - last chance to answer the questions so I can write a far more entertaining piece of fiction than what you are going to write :

Were you aroused when you buried the the corpse of the kidnapped invisible giraffe ? - yes or no ? (This is a yes or no answer question only ! Everything else will be ignored)

Your homo erotica involving small bears witnessed by everyone on here. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170789.msg52979547#msg52979547) Were they midgets or underage ? (Choose one or both of the two)

Failing to answer immediately will be considered an undisputed, undeniable admission of guilt.

Sorry for not indulging your kidnapping giraffes theory, perhaps when you present observable instances that demonstrate that it is undeniable that I did kidnap a giraffe I may indulge you further. For now that avenue of derailing desperate garbage is being closed down.

Everyone can witness that The-One-Above-All saw my allegation. Refused to answer yes or no. Refused to confirm whether the "little bears" were midgets or underage.

Failing to answer immediately will be considered an undisputed, undeniable admission of guilt.

He had ample opportunity to reply and the consequences were clearly stated if he didn't answer immediately in the format that I demanded. Therefore I present it as an undisputed, undeniable admission of guilt.

I will now set up a self moderated parody thread "exposing" this filthy pervert. Creating local rules preventing him (also known as "we" or "us"), his alts or his cronies from replying to it. It will be an edutainment guide named: "How to spot the fallacies of a pigeon pooper."

I archived this whole disgusting thread. All the sick perverted references and insults you made. So I have plenty of material - even if you shut up, make another alt or swallow the tampon.

Dirty turds (especially when on "official" dirty turd list by the self appointed coprophile) will be invited to make their faecal vocal contributions

You have more balls ( and less brains).

We are pleased you are not that kind of pussy and weasel.

This perverted testicle voyeur (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170789.msg52995505#msg52995505) that "likes" little talking bears to "watch"  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170789.msg52979265#msg52979265)is under false the impression there is more than one of me.

Sorry - there is no pussy and weasel - just me (human). Too busy stomping on your sexy fluffy slippers that you mistook for me.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TMAN on November 06, 2019, 09:35:13 AM
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzBOREzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzBore

you are aware that opinions are the same as arseholes everyone fucking has one, just happens to be yours are boring and long using repetitive language and are far from unique.

Cryptocunter you are just the village idiot who people enjoy prodding on occasion for some mild amusement, the effort and time you take for your posts is laughable seeing how little they sway anyone - your words are as useless as a used tampon



Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 06, 2019, 12:16:47 PM

I am tired of the-one-above-all stomping my scammer supporting face into the dirt.

I want this over so I am now punching myself in the face with my feeble strikes to try to end this pain as quickly as possible





It appears you are certainly an acolyte of suchmoon. Following the same kind of drawn out self denigration in public until is just about managing to utter more and more ludicrous garbage, making themselves look more and more pathetic and retarded.

I mean just look at the what he is claiming. It has reached this point.


We have presented undeniable observable instances of tman scamming in his auctions  AND undeniable evidence of (by his own words) he is supporting him on to default trust (the most trusted members on the forum) he is also in his own words saying that they do NOT deserve red trust nor a flag. He is also refusing after reviewing the undeniable observable instance of tmans scamming to answer yes or no to if it is scamming or not. He seems to be claiming that if you scam people using words that is just "Comments".

He then claims (in suchmoon fashion) that him making up some strange " we have kidnapped and killed a giraffe " with ZERO evidence to support this strange allegation is all he needs to prove that we are being unreasonable and making connection that do not really exist. LOL


Look you low functioning scammer supporting dreg

We and every member here is able to clearly verify for themselves

Undeniable observable instances that undeniably demonstrate TMAN auction scamming  = YES
Undeniable observable instances of you supporting TMAN on default trust = YES
Undeniable observable instances of xtraelv-scammer supporter making ludicrous excuses for scammers = YES
Undeniable observable instances of xtraelv REFUSING to answer yes or no if he thinks Tman is scamming = YES

* this is not even taking into account

Undeniable observable instances of self confessed trust abuse from tman colluding and protecting other scammers from whistleblowers.
Strong implication and evidence of extortion involving tman and other undeniable scammers
Undeniable shared trust inclusions between these scammers and xtraelv the scammer supporter



Xtraelv seems to be suggesting he has the equivalent let us see ... errr

Any evidence of us kidnapping a giraffe =  NO

Undeniable evidence of us ignoring his stupid claim that of course has ZERO credibility since he has no evidence at all = YES



I mean this on top of all his observably retarded excuses we destroyed that were laughable , and his foolish and pathetic attempts to claim we were afraid to debate with him LOL after demanding it take place with or without theymos holding his fragile little paw.

Now he says, I will build a parody to demonstrate how crazy and foolish WE ARE...........hahahahahahhahhhahahahhaha

Xtraelv our new fav scammer supporter on bitcointalk.  Also even better he seems to have no shame and no lack of energy to keep humiliating himself and his scamming pals actions over and over whilst bumping our very important threads.

People are already suggesting xtraelv is our alt.  Hahahahahahahaahhaha  well ? that would be telling wouldn't it.


Tman = still ignoring us I see. Tman come out and tell us your side of the undeniable auction scamming. You seem to be happy to let xtraelv humiliate himself over and over in your defense ??  that's not very kind is it??

Tman why don't you tell us how you were not scamming at all..... give us the under cover agents story about simply locating attack vectors in the current auction systems here for the future protection of others. I want to hear that one. hahahahah





Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: xtraelv on November 06, 2019, 12:52:09 PM

I am tired of the-one-above-all stomping my scammer supporting face into the dirt.

I want this over so I am now punching myself in the face with my feeble strikes to try to end this pain as quickly as possible




More evidence of dishonesty. Clicking the link shows I did not say any of that.


People are already suggesting xtraelv is our alt.  Hahahahahahahaahhaha  well ? that would be telling wouldn't it.


The voices in your head are not "people". .

Nobody with half a brain would think that you are my alt. Don't flatter yourself. Advancing such rumor is pretending to be me and that will get you a definite scammer tag.

I have more than enough to show your consistent manipulation, falsehoods, blatant bias, perversions and narcissism.

I also have enough material to make it into an entertaining educational circus that people will read for years showing the deceptive methods you use.

The difference between the fiction you write and I write is that I label it correctly as fiction (and parody). I get shitloads of merit that I don't need (already well over the 1000 needed for legendary rank)  and you are desperate to get merit and get fuck all.

I cannot believe some of the things you wrote in the wet dream of yours. WTF ! It is hilarious. You have no shame. You really do need some help.

I'm sure it sounded so much better in your head. You managed to shit on yourself from a great height there. The-One-Above-All pigeon pooper.



Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TMAN on November 06, 2019, 02:36:56 PM
Tman come out and tell us your side of the undeniable auction scamming.

as I said before you clown I value your opinion as much as I do that of a 2 year old having a tantrum, IE fuck all - you mean so little to me and most of the forum so why on earth would I try to discuss something with you? you are suffering from many many mental issues, the only thing I would engage with you about is trying to find out where these underlying issues came from. School bullying? uncle fucking? did your dad touch you at night?

come on Just spill it - what has turned you into this retard?


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 06, 2019, 03:50:41 PM

Not even daring to dispute he is making bogus and ludicrous comparison and SUPPORTING SCAMMERS whilst doing so hahahah


we have hit the JACKPOT with this XLDIV ..... this new scammer supporting bitch of ours  is like xmas come early.

Well, you can surely see WHY some may be starting to believe you are our alt right?  I mean who else would REALLY present such a ludicrous and pathetic defense if they were not deliberately trying to drag these scammers through the mud whilst making up those kind of piss taking excuses and trying to divert with such hilarious comparisons and off topic garbage as if to make is seem totally RIDICULOUS to even attempt to defend their prior observable and undeniable scamming and other financially dangerous behaviors. Let's review just a few for old times sake hahahah ....

We have the xldiv police man scene that sums up his excuses to that point ..

start reading his moronic low functioning excuses for undeniable scammers here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170789.msg52938521#msg52938521  OR just read our summary of his finest deranged slobbering and feltching scammer ass.

so far in the xlraelv police station.

alice = hi mr police man here is the video evidence and signed witness statements of others demonstrating the person living n the house next to me , punching me in the face, pulling me out of my car and stealing it whilst driving over my cat. He is a total scumbag.

xtraelv police man = well maybe they only did that because you kept moaning to us that they did that ??

alice = errr is that even possible? does that require some kind of time travel?

axtraelv police man = yes, now shut up with all the questions, anyway what I meant to say was  now that you called him a scum bag I can not really take you seriously you fucking bitch.

alice = you will ignore the video evidence and multiple witness statements and the fact he still has my car and my cat is dead? because i correctly described him as a scumbag?

xtraelv police man = same old accusations i heard before from you a min ago ..boring

alice = well some may say that is undeniable evidence, I mean even the thief does not deny it because he knows it is all recorded and 100s of people witnessed it, the cat is still there squashed and my car is gone

xtraelv police man = well what I meant to say is you have not reported a crime before so I can not believe you nor take your advice on what constitutes a crime can I now.

alice = well what would be worthy of reporting and how many things would I have to report before you can accept a errr report? I mean how do you make your first report? how would that even work? if you had to make a report before your first report? is that more time travel?

xtraelv police man = well for a start I can't discuss any of that with you at this time, however I will say the person you are reporting helped me purchase a cheap car just a moment ago, so he is certainly not a thief is he, if he gets me a cheap car why would I give one fuck if that looked like your old car? he is very helpful and nice. I am upset to even listen to your slander and defamation. There may be some punishment for those crimes let me look that up whist you are still here..

alice = wtf

xtra elv police man = watch the langue please or you will be arrested, that is a serious crime you are committing, just put the cuffs on as a precautionary measure, put the video over there in the garbage disposal first though, I don't like going near that its very dangerous.

alice = so you will do nothing?

xtraelv policeman = well I said i will arrest you right, you see me getting the cuffs out don't ya? you call that nothing? you heard of defamation?

alice = NO will you do nothing about the thief who stole my car and killed my cat even though you have undeniable evidence

xtraelv police man = yes, I do plenty of things for him, we help each other out, and ....well as my captain says we need to forgive and forget everything except whistle blowing and reporting crimes (both untrustworthy and financially dangerous to other citizens don't you know)... come along quietly please don't want you slipping and smashing your face into my delicate fist again do we , you've already done that 5 x in the next 45 seconds. See how bruised my poor hand is going to be.



Next the immediate self debunking and hypocritical - how to make yourself look retarded -xtraelv is a pro in this field..haha

WHINES about our lack of empathy for other after clearly demonstrating he has no empathy
WHINES about ad hominem attacks right after conducting ad hominem attacks haha

THEN says when we point this out we are.....wait for it......  WHINING  hahaha - you have to kind of love this guy right?


Claims the systems of control are working perfectly as they should be...


then does not dispute it works this way

He says, well that because you don't understand  IT IS SUPPOSED TO WORK LIKE THAT ... haha. Well yes the design is fucked and according to the design it is and does work exactly like that.  Brilliant I have no idea why anyone has the right to criticize it then since it is supposed to

a/ be wide open to abuse

b/ reward abuse financially

c/ reward abuse by entrenching your power to abuse more

d/ reward abuse by allowing low function slobbering bums to feel they have some value

e/ crush free speech and create echo chambers



Next we move on to the You dare not fight me you chicken the-one-above-all , everyone can see how terrified you are to face me

2 fighters

above all - I will fight you anywhere any place including RIGHT NOW.

xldiv - I want someone to hold my hand.

above all - okay I'm willing to go ahead just you and me,  or theymos can hold your hand

xldiv - You make theymos do it or I will have an excuse not to fight. I'm counting on him not showing xldiv thinks praying and hoping.

above all - okay theymos is fine,  or else let's just do IT NOW YOU PUSSY.

Xldiv - See everyone he is afraid of me and trying to get out of the fight.

hahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahaha  okay xldiv you just get more stupid


Worrying sexual references xtraelv sees in this piece of text .. where his little care bears are telling him is is winning and still a hero even though he is getting totally beaten up in our analogy of the 2 fighters. We are not sure what he is even seeing there to make any sexual connection at all, then asking us if they are children bears or midgets?? err okay

here is the text taken in the context of fight in public where the bears are ring side cheering him on with his mommy

"look the fact he is not actually giving you the death blow and allowing you to survive proves he is a total wussy and knows you would kick his ass xldiv, you are still our hero " says the little  care bears from meta...haha


here is what xtraelv has to say repeated referring to that

"Ewwwww that sounds like you are having a wet dream. I hope you didn't make a mess"

"Your homo-erotic fantasies involving bears is witnessed" - points to that text

"Your homo erotica involving small bears witnessed by everyone on here. Were they midgets or underage"

"Refused to confirm whether the "little bears" were midgets or underage. "


Errr sorry xtraPERV  but the fight is clearly just me smashing your face in inside the ring ( that would be in the analogy us undeniably destroying your excuses and scammer supporting specious arguments.  The little bears are you little friends you are plastering all over the thread and you avatar cheering you on telling you that you are winning clearly whilst is is undeniable you are getting the shit beaten out of you. With us being merciful and keeping you alive.

Were does the sexual part come from in your mind? why are you asking if these bears are underage? homo erotica with little bears?

You mind is damaged .... have you been taking those vitamins lauda hands out at these debauched DT sex orgies. Did they use your moronic scammer supporting skull as a space hopper outside on the concrete or something. Lots of late night chats with tman and vod??

Kind of worrying us there a bit XLPERV. Your parents keep you locked in the basement right? away from any other vulnerable ....err I guess creatures.


Asked xtrelv 3 clear and simple questions and he replied with a lot of garbage unrelated derailing crap ... we tried to extrapolate the answers but said he didn't agree with what answers we have presented.

1. Do you or have you in the last 3 months included on your trust list  lauda, tman or nutildah and do they include or have they included you in the last 3 months?  Please answer in full

tman and nutildah and xldiv   ALL SUPPORT EACH OTHER ON DT

2. Do you accept that the purpose of negative trust is to place a warning of " financially high risk" or  " scammer"  ( since those are the 2 messages you get at the top of your threads if you meet certain thresholds theymos has set here for negative trust (old system) or flags (new system)). This is the PRIME and central reason for the negative trust and flagging systems. These are clearly theymos's intentions since they are his own words on the warning banners?

We thought he was trying to say YES  Presumably then xldiv says NO because he claims he is not happy with our extrapolated answer but will not explain




3. Is someone that lies or intentionally  deceives others for their own direct financial gain ..  a scammer and financially high risk? yes or no?

we presumed he meant YES with lots of excuses and other blathering on.    Presumably then xldiv says NO because he claims he is not happy with our extrapolated answer but will not explain [/color]


still refuses to answer them with clear direct yes or no.


Reviewed the undeniable evidence below and we provided XTRA help demonstrating tman trying to silence and punish OG for giving his honest opinion to other victims of the CON ( auction)


Seems Tman also is not above a bit of scamming directly when it suits him (we quote OG below who discovered this)

"TMAN used minerjones to anonymously auction a KIALARA and then attempted to manipulate the auction by stating, "wow this has to be a record low for a sub #100 serial. if I didn't have so many I would be snapping this up"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1931778.msg19286369#msg19286369

Admission it was his auction:
"Dude I haven't crossed paths with OG in over 6 months, it wasn't until he derailed my auction hosted by MJ that this kicked off."
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1946142.msg19349060#msg19349060 "

after careful examination of the undeniable observable instances of scamming xtraelv-scammer-supporter still says...

this is not financially high risk behavior - no red tag
this is behavior that is acceptable for a DT default trust member
this is NOT scamming it is simply making COMMENTS on an auction.

So xtraelv says you can scam people, deceive them for direct financial gain and that is simply MAKING COMMENTS ( keep to using words only though)


Now xtraevil says he has demonstrated clearly we are JUST as guilty as he is.  He says where he has avoided giving straight answers yes or no regarding his undeniable support of undeniable scammers who SUPPORT HIM on DT  he can clearly demonstrate we also need to answer his made up giraffe kidnapping and killing fantasies, so that makes him all okay because we ignored his pathetic moronic spew...

He does not deny or dispute this is where we currently are.

We and every member here is able to clearly verify for themselves that we have...

Undeniable observable instances that undeniably demonstrate TMAN auction scamming  = YES
Undeniable observable instances of you supporting TMAN on default trust = YES
Undeniable observable instances of xtraelv-scammer supporter making ludicrous excuses for scammers = YES
Undeniable observable instances of xtraelv REFUSING to answer yes or no if he thinks Tman is scamming = YES

* this is not even taking into account

Undeniable observable instances of self confessed trust abuse from tman colluding and protecting other scammers from whistleblowers.
Strong implication and evidence of extortion involving tman and other undeniable scammers
Undeniable shared trust inclusions between these scammers and xtraelv the scammer supporter



Xtraelv seems to be suggesting he has the equivalent .....let us see ... errr

Any evidence of us kidnapping a giraffe =  NO

Not quite the equivalent that this idiot xldiv is trying to claim hey??

So you see in his mind it is now time to create a parody to demonstrate how guilty we are and he is of course NOT A SCAMMER SUPPORTER AT ALL.

Then wonders why people are perhaps starting to wonder why he is our alt??? hahahahaha

But wait, we may get more red trust for saying people have said  that. That is totally red trust worthy and is not just COMMENTS ... the COMMENTS defense and the fact people have asked us that is of no importance at all. Red trust is coming  NOM NOM NOM.

Some people may though say is adding yet ANOTHER red mark to one already so RED ..really clear evidence it is not an alt??  I mean I am not saying they should even wonder about that, but some MAY wonder.

I mean a shockingly pathetic, ludicrous and funny defense full of holes and well ...just time travel etc whilst ensuring all the details are presented over and over and over of their undeniable scamming before just saying  THOSE ARE JUST COMMENTS ..... would be a cunning plan wouldn't it.  I mean clearly demonstrating any attempt at a defense of such undeniable scamming is HILARIOUS and TOE CURLING. hahahah

Then again according to other DT members, (perhaps ourselves some believe)  we would not even know if he is one of our alts would we, I mean with the multiple personality disorders other DT members claim we suffer from  etc haha,  so although we strongly deny this xldiv scammer supporter is our alt, and would be ashamed of impersonating someone this fucked up, and disturbed .... you must decide for yourselves ....LOL

I wonder what xldiv should say now, to make the undeniable scammers suffer even more.... hmmmmm...... he must secretly despise them , garnering all this attention to them and their scams



Tman come out and tell us your side of the undeniable auction scamming.

as I said before you clown I value your opinion as much as I do that of a 2 year old having a tantrum, IE fuck all - you mean so little to me and most of the forum so why on earth would I try to discuss something with you? you are suffering from many many mental issues, the only thing I would engage with you about is trying to find out where these underlying issues came from. School bullying? uncle fucking? did your dad touch you at night?

come on Just spill it - what has turned you into this retard?


Tman just popping in whilst we are on ignore and he is never going to reply to us again on meta...hehe

Just to reaffirm that the only explanation for presenting observable instances of his UNDENIABLE SCAMMING is that you must of been the victim of errr well as you can see the sort of family issues TMAN and his DEVIANT PALS are fixated on.  I may tman have been touched by some small toy bears at night? does that count ?

Maybe TMAN believes the very wholesome FAMILY experiences he was treated to or perhaps how he treats his own family is the same recipe for creating SCAMMER HUNTERS and it is UNDENIABLE SCAMMERS.  

But no explanation by TMAN regarding his own undeniable scamming is there? explain it all to us TMAN how it happened, let us get inside your scamming little mind.

We hope you are not paying (well apart from with mutual DT includes and allowing xtraelv to be part of the scammer gang) for this defense xlperv is presenting to the board. I had some input with the little bears we suspect...haha




Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TMAN on November 06, 2019, 04:26:13 PM
Tman just popping in

yes in and out, I use you for slight pleasures on occasion, seeing how many ranty words I can get out of you. The energy you waste, how triggered I make you, how triggered the whole of DT makes you, Merit as well - all of it is fucking awesome to me.

I might type out 50 words to you, you hit me back with 5400..

also you are a Pajeet


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: LoyceV on November 06, 2019, 04:57:59 PM
Wow, caps, bold, underlined, red text - I haven't seen cryptohunter so agitated in a long time. Goes to show how little attention is needed to keep him happy - just someone replying to him is enough. Doesn't even matter much what's inside those replies, he's gonna make it mean anything he wants.
It's so tempting to post here too now, but I really can't get myself to read these walls of text. It always feels like an angry troll hitting his keyboard.

Maybe this will help: I have earned 4009 Merit until today. That's enough for 16 Supervotes for the DT1-election! Meanwhile, I have 17 (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-11-02_Sat_07.33h/459836.html) users included on my Trust list. Several of them don't qualify for DT1 because they don't have enough users on their own Trust list. This means I give a supervote for all other users on my list, and I have Supervotes to spare! This means I can hand-pick users from my Rank up pipeline (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5107427.0) to enter them onto DT1! It's the kind of power theymos used to have before the changes to DefaultTrust, now handed to me :o
I'd should be exhilarated with power, if only I would care about it.
I expect a very long reply from ch nonetheless :P


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: nutildah on November 06, 2019, 05:02:50 PM
I might type out 50 words to you, you hit me back with 5400..

His last post was over 2,500 words... That would be almost $200 worth of work for me. Yet he did it for free, and I'd be surprised if anybody actually reads the whole thing. What a waste of lifetime.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 06, 2019, 05:55:27 PM
Wow, caps, bold, underlined, red text - I haven't seen cryptohunter so agitated in a long time. Goes to show how little attention is needed to keep him happy - just someone replying to him is enough. Doesn't even matter much what's inside those replies, he's gonna make it mean anything he wants.
It's so tempting to post here too now, but I really can't get myself to read these walls of text. It always feels like an angry troll hitting his keyboard.

Maybe this will help: I have earned 4009 Merit until today. That's enough for 16 Supervotes for the DT1-election! Meanwhile, I have 17 (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-11-02_Sat_07.33h/459836.html) users included on my Trust list. Several of them don't qualify for DT1 because they don't have enough users on their own Trust list. This means I give a supervote for all other users on my list, and I have Supervotes to spare! This means I can hand-pick users from my Rank up pipeline (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5107427.0) to enter them onto DT1! It's the kind of power theymos used to have before the changes to DefaultTrust, now handed to me :o
I'd should be exhilarated with power, if only I would care about it.
I expect a very long reply from ch nonetheless :P

ah old loyceV is here with some new accusations of trolling. I see.

Watch this everyone.

LoyceV can you present our central points being made here about tmans undeniable scamming that you can demonstrate are untrue?

Also can you investigate then in detail give your account of why his actions are not financially high risk, and not deserving of red trust but rather are the actions of one of the most trusted members of the board?  Do you include TMAN on default trust LoyceV? or Nutildah? or Lauda?

Remember how you always cry we are nasty to you, picking on you, rude to you FIRST then when it is investigated that was all a pack of bullshit and you come looking to poke your nose in and hide behind your pals sniping away when you think it is safe FIRST REALLY?




@tman you forgot to explain how your undeniable auction scamming, was not ..... err scamming.

@Nutildah https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5190369.20

Imagine 200 bucks making any difference to a NEM stake holder....hahaha

Oh yeah you broke down bum you probably never were a NEM stake holder nor early dark adopter.

Don't forget you were begging for 0.02btc loans only months ago.

haha

2 scammers and a scammer supporter come to join the fun. Stick around guys. Always a pleasure. Where is that fat slob suchmoon hiding? shame not to have the full set of dummies here to bitch slap around at will with observable instances of scamming, scammer supporting, slobbering moronic debunkings and other funny ass kickings we gave you all from the past.

Keep boasting about your cycled merits boys.....  pray we don't ask you to provide any REAL ACHIEVEMENTS from the past to show us how valuable you all are.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TMAN on November 06, 2019, 06:03:39 PM
boring - same shit different post.

have you ever looked up the definition of insanity?


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: o_e_l_e_o on November 06, 2019, 07:48:50 PM
pray we don't ask you to provide any REAL ACHIEVEMENTS from the past to show us how valuable you all are.
I cured a man who was turned in to a newt! That must count for something.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TheNewAnon135246 on November 06, 2019, 08:23:57 PM
Wow, caps, bold, underlined, red text - I haven't seen cryptohunter so agitated in a long time. Goes to show how little attention is needed to keep him happy - just someone replying to him is enough. Doesn't even matter much what's inside those replies, he's gonna make it mean anything he wants.

Can you scrape all of his posts for a total word count? I'll do the math.

According to several sources the average person types 40 words per minute. Assuming that CH is average, could someone scrape all of CH's posts and calculate how many hours he has wasted so far?


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: suchmoon on November 06, 2019, 08:42:23 PM
Can you scrape all of his posts for a total word count? I'll do the math.

above-something-or-other: 241298
cryptohunter: 1300737


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: o_e_l_e_o on November 06, 2019, 08:45:22 PM
above-something-or-other: 241298
10,000 words/merit. Ooft.

Also, a combined total is coming in at 642.5 hours, or just shy of a month non-stop. Impressive.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: suchmoon on November 06, 2019, 08:56:45 PM
10,000 words/merit. Ooft.

I grabbed some stats for the dirty turds who participated in the last few pages of this thread, [update] counting only posts created since the introduction of the merit system, and merits earned on those posts:

Code:
UserName         |WordCount|Merits|WordsPerMerit|
-----------------|---------|------|-------------|
TheNewAnon135246 |    38740|   793|           49|
Foxpup           |    36273|   693|           52|
TMAN             |   109224|  1039|          105|
suchmoon         |   398738|  3090|          129|
Lauda            |   143910|   873|          165|
xtraelv          |   221501|  1333|          166|
o_e_l_e_o        |   477731|  2842|          168|
nutildah         |   318849|  1407|          227|
LoyceV           |  2299963|  3873|          594|
cryptohunter     |   411775|   156|         2640|
The-One-Above-All|   241298|    24|        10054|

Obviously LoyceV's numbers are skewed by the massive data dumps he's posting.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: o_e_l_e_o on November 06, 2019, 09:01:42 PM
Obviously LoyceV's numbers are skewed by the massive data dumps he's posting.
Loyce 3rd biggest shitposter on the forum confirmed.

I'm off to write a bot which will edit all my posts and delete every conjunction. Gotta get that ratio down a bit.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: LoyceV on November 06, 2019, 09:07:46 PM
Obviously LoyceV's numbers are skewed by the massive data dumps he's posting.
Loyce 3rd biggest shitposter on the forum confirmed.
Justmyluck:(

Quote
I'm off to write a bot which will edit all my posts and delete every conjunction. Gotta get that ratio down a bit.
I'mtakingamuchsimplerapproach:Ijustremoveallspacesfromallposts,makingeverythingonebigword.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: suchmoon on November 06, 2019, 09:21:17 PM
I'mtakingamuchsimplerapproach:Ijustremoveallspacesfromallposts,makingeverythingonebigword.

You might want to get rid of punctuation as well because the above would still count as 4 words.

I have updated the stats. Initially I counted all merits but I think it's more fair to the pigeon if we count only merits earned for posts created after the introduction of the merit system.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Lafu on November 06, 2019, 09:42:30 PM
And 90% of his posts are still about the same thing !
2,500 Words in every post are Blah Blah blah Complaining and crying !
He got the first Prize of the Blah Blah Cup.

A waste of time.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 06, 2019, 10:46:58 PM
boring - same shit different post.

have you ever looked up the definition of insanity?

Yes, it says

People with undeniable instances of scamming that are independently verifiable claiming they are fit for default trust and not scammers at all.

or

People like suchmoon who claim the terms " good post" or "bad post" are meaningless terms without strict definition and criteria to match against.  Then coming here quoting the merit cycled metric as "proof" of being a good poster.

or

People that when challenged to bring their best original thought provoking posts running away or admitting they have not made any then quoting their high merit score proving they are valuable posters.

or

People with ZERO achievements here in many years again quoting their high merits scores as evidence of their high value posts"

or

The warden the of main bitcoinforum on the internets  enabling, sanctioning and rewarding undeniable scammers and empowering them to " take good care" of it by giving them power to silence whistle blowers and crush free speech whilst taking all the best rev streams LOL... then just compounding the issue after being explicitly warned about merging merit and trust, then compounding it by constantly heaping incentive to game the core metric he is building every thing on top of whistle making sure it is so wide open to gaming it is impossible to demonstrate abuse hahah... although that was under possible insanity, or experimenting with things beyond your understanding or just fully complicit.  We will see how long it is allowed to go.


those were just some examples of insanity


LOL at the non achieving dregs here quoting their merit to post ratio or merit to word ratio (whilst controlling merits) BUT HAVING NO ACHIEVEMENTS after years here and all still needing to spam sigs because they are such broke down bums LOL'

@TMAN and XLPERV  -- you both forgot to explain how TMANS undeniable auction scamming  is not really scamming?  what is the story we keep waiting but there is no forth coming under cover agents story yet??



@Lafu who? - LOL I mean only since the cryptopia (EXIT SCAMMING EXCHANGE) you were pushing people on to for pay and working for....have we even heard of you?  what alt projects were you part of mr scammer supporter, by part of we don't mean how many different alts do you suddenly have lately haha

I love how this fucking piece of dirt claims presenting observable instances of his pals scamming is " blah blah"  what a trust worthy exit scamming pusher you are.

Can you tell me about your major achievements ( except pushing people towards exit scams)??  Oh wait you have none....haha



Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: xtraelv on November 06, 2019, 11:30:50 PM

<snip the the text where "we" is talking in his head again and posting those delusional fantasies>

Errr sorry xtraPERV  but the fight is clearly just me smashing your face in inside the ring ( that would be in the analogy us undeniably destroying your excuses and scammer supporting specious arguments.  The little bears are you little friends you are plastering all over the thread and you avatar cheering you on telling you that you are winning clearly whilst is is undeniable you are getting the shit beaten out of you. With us being merciful and keeping you alive.

Were does the sexual part come from in your mind? why are you asking if these bears are underage? homo erotica with little bears?


Your entire thread is full of sexual references. You know what a cumguzzler and BBW is right ?

https://i.imgur.com/Id4GyUs.png

https://i.imgur.com/oCY5FjE.jpg

" that's it xldiv, keep ramming your face into his heel like that over and over" " that's it now you're almost unconscious and looking like you have been hit by a train , you are certainly winning, look at him not a single scratch"    the little bears chant...hahaha

Hahahahaha  - you said it. Master & Madam "we" The-One-Above-All . Everyone can see your BDSM fetish. Your need to dominate. Consistently self aggrandizing by using the term "we" instead of I.  The need for control and submission to your wills.

The fantasy you share of someone ramming their face into your heel. Witnessed by talking little bears.


You have more balls ( and less brains) than 90% of the weasels

Here you are admiring my testicles and comparing it to my brains and the testicles of other "furries".

Everyone can just judge for themselves.

Click on the link to the text. I didn't change a word !


Tman just popping in

yes in and out, I use you for slight pleasures on occasion, seeing how many ranty words I can get out of you. The energy you waste, how triggered I make you, how triggered the whole of DT makes you, Merit as well - all of it is fucking awesome to me.

I might type out 50 words to you, you hit me back with 5400..

also you are a Pajeet

I've never seen this pigeon pooping testicle voyeur that likes to be watched by talking "little bears" while forcing someone to submit and rub their face into his heel so triggered. He is trying to bury his slip up in words under a mountain of text. That is why he is so frantically tapping his keyboard. Hiding what he said.

Must be difficult for "we" - coming out in public like that.


I might type out 50 words to you, you hit me back with 5400..

His last post was over 2,500 words... That would be almost $200 worth of work for me. Yet he did it for free, and I'd be surprised if anybody actually reads the whole thing. What a waste of lifetime.

Sometimes it contains funny shit. When everyone is laughing but "we" has no idea why. Accidental comic relief.

"We" has whole fantasy conversations with themselves. Even to the extent of projecting those conversations onto others by altering the text of their quotes.

It is an interesting insight into his "alternate" lifestyle and reality.


People with ZERO achievements here in many years again quoting their high merits scores as evidence of their high value posts"


Quote from "People" with ZERO achievements here with almost no merits desperate to get some.

At least merits show that some people value their contribution. Zero or low merit scores just shows you are wasting your time on here.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 07, 2019, 12:08:18 AM

Some lame excuses for his strange sexual perversions that he managed to extract from our innocent and highly accurate fighting scene as an analogy of him undeniable getting beaten up by us in debate to the degree we felt some pitty.

However the best bit is ...


Quote from "People" with ZERO achievements here with almost no merits desperate to get some.

At least merits show that some people value their contribution. Zero or low merit scores just shows you are wasting your time on here.

Here comes something funny.

ERR XLDIV can you present your greatest achievements since being a member here for years?  I mean surely all those merits must mean you have some major achievements, you know like how would this movement be any different if you had not been here supporting scammers, and making us laugh with your funny excuses.  

Merits show that merits are cycled between a handful of scum bags that use them to control trust and many other aspects of control here. They also show just in this thread how morons like you who DARE not even answer yes or no if TMANS actions constitute scamming or present other specious arguments we crush get merits. Your net negative shit = merits.

Merits are garbage. As you can see we pulled you apart here over and over. How can your posts be valuable?? when our posts have destroyed you over and over. I mean look at this post it demonstrates you are a total and utter moron who "trys" to sound smart. Some are impressed with those that have a nice command of the English language, yours is Okay, I know plenty of girls like you who have a nice way of presenting their thoughts. However, the cake they can bake with the limited ingredients they have is always a little disappointing once you start to scrutinize their critical reasoning capabilities especially in a debate. They are like that nice looking car with a shitty weak engine, that is you also.  Pathetic and low functioning. Your arguments and excuses just fall apart under mild scrutiny before your lurch to the next more desperate and pathetic attempt to mask your stupidity.

The reader should note, that they are claiming it is surprising that the people who give out all the majority merits who are the same scamming scum and scammer supporters that I am calling out correctly as scammers and scammers supporters have not given us much merit for our posts about THEM.... I wonder why we do not have many merits LOL LOL LOL
Also the scammers and scammer supporters giving out all the merits ....GET THEIR MERITS FROM EACH OTHER MOSTLY hahahhaha

Then they said.... we get more merit off each other than we give to you.... so that proves our posts are more valuable hahahahahhahahahhahahaha

This post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170789.msg53001936#msg53001936  can you not see how we crushed you over and over until your mind was spewing pure garbage?? JUST DON'T EVER RUN AWAY... keep coming back until you can take no more... if that is years all the better for us and our dirty turds thread. If we are busy from time to time, never worry we will return we will never abandon you xtraelv you scammer supporting moronic slobbering dirty bag.

I mean pick one of our central points here on tmans auction scamming debate and show how you debunked it??

or even man up and answer

Was tman guilty of scamming on the auction yes or no? I will call a full open debate with theymos on it soon in a new thread in meta, because if deliberately deceiving people for financial gain whilst also trying silencing those that may be giving their honest "comments" all on the same thread is not financially dangerous behavior/ scamming then he should explain what the fuck a scam is.... because it does not fit with the universally accepted definition of scamming does it?

Is deliberate scammer supporting and defending worse than scammers who do not deny it themselves?  this is also an interesting debate... who is more dangerous??

The " just commenting" defense of undeniable scamming ... this should certainly be debated and theymos should give guidance.



Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: xtraelv on November 07, 2019, 01:24:07 AM

ERR XLDIV can you present your greatest achievements since being a member here for years?  I mean surely all those merits must mean you have some major achievements, you know like how would this movement be any different if you had not been here supporting scammers, and making us laugh with your funny excuses.  


Sure- my biggest achievement on here is my ongoing project of documenting the history of this site and writing about it:


The most iconic bitcointalk threads. History on Bitcointalk. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4322078.0)

Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4359615.0)

The Cypherpunks and Bitcoin. The years before bitcointalk.  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4356808.0)

Bitcointalk history of MtGox and how a Bitcointalk post caught the MtGox hacker.  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4412667.0)

Bitcointalk history of hacks and vandalism.  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4405796.0)
 
Silk road and Bitcointalk. How it played a role in its rise and fall.  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4437773.0)

Bitcoin Savings and Trust and Pirateat40 on Bitcointalk (PONZI)  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4464504.0)

knightmb on bitcointalk - from 371,067.36 BTC to Mitt Romney extortion.  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4547124.0)

History on Bitcointalk - Mining equipment scams, shams and failed deliveries.  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4698074.0)

Bitcointalk trolls, dysfunction and all out flame wars. Guide to the scandals.  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4736673.0)

It also inspired others to write about it.

Hopefully it will be used in the future as reference by others that keep documenting the history of this forum.



Another one of my achievements is working tirelessly with the help of translations from taikuri13, lafu, theyoungmillionaire and many others in preventing people from losing crypto and money due to endless scams. The best method is educating people how to recognize scams and protecting themselves by using best practices with internet security, 2FA , holding their own private keys, cold wallet storage. etc.

How to avoid getting your exchange account HaCkEd or pHiShEd  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4404175.0)

This means close contact with exchange operators, coin developers, others in the industry and in some cases government agencies.

It means actively working with others on DT in preventing scams. We don't get them all and not everything comes with a consumer warning. DT's make errors in judgement but the intent is to make this overall a safer place. Working with or collaborating with someone is not an endorsement of that person or organisation - it is working on a common goal.

Unfortunately it also means that I have been involved in investigating a lot of losses and often it has some very sad stories where it has severely hurt people, affected their mental health, lost life savings and created legal issues.

Identifying several high profile scammers (with the help of others -  Cryptodevil and many others have helped) that have resulted in police prosecutions and active investigations is one of the highlights.

Initially I didn't like Cryptodevil and I worked against him. Owlcatz convinced me otherwise. Cryptodevil became one of my biggest allies in fighting against scammers under the old system and still helps me at times.

On a number of occasions with the help of exchanges I was able (with the help of others) to prevent the loss of funds and freeze stolen assets.

I have also personally lost crypto due to various scams, market manipulation, failed projects, exchange hacks and failures.


Creation of a mega-thread that is entertaining and not full of bickering.
Wall of fame / shame. Shit posts so bad that they are actually funny (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4564216.0)

https://i.imgur.com/pYxAEnf.png

Dedicated to humor that only can come from shit posters.
https://i.imgur.com/OvTdGW7.png

Another one of the achievements I am proud of is creating the slogan / signature "We are surrounded by legends on this forum. Phenomenal successes and catastrophic failures. Then there are the scams. This forum is a digital museum. "

Here's a draft of a welcome message for new users. The user will see it on the screen confirming their registration, and it'll also be available in the help center at any time.

Some text in the intro was obviously inspired by xtraelv's signature, which I really like.

<snip>

Welcome to bitcointalk.org, the Bitcoin Forum! You can access this welcome message from the "help" link in the top menu bar at any time.

As a member of the forum, you are surrounded by legends; phenomenal successes and catastrophic failures. The forum was created by Satoshi Nakamoto (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5.0) and saw the first exchange (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=20.0), the first altcoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=6017.0), and the first ICO (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=428589.0), but also catastrophic software flaws (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=822.0), massive thefts (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=16457.0), and incredible scams (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=101339.0). You too have an opportunity to become part of the forum's history: whether and in what way you do so is up to you.

You know who Theymos is right ? He is not just the administrator of this forum. He is the dude that wrote the  Bitcoin Block Explorer and corresponded with the real Satoshi Nakamoto.

That introduction will be seen by future generations.

I love the bit that Theymos added:

You too have an opportunity to become part of the forum's history: whether and in what way you do so is up to you.

What is your biggest achievement on here ?


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: nutildah on November 07, 2019, 02:31:17 AM
I grabbed some stats for the dirty turds who participated in the last few pages of this thread, [update] counting only posts created since the introduction of the merit system, and merits earned on those posts:

Code:
UserName         |WordCount|Merits|WordsPerMerit|
-----------------|---------|------|-------------|
nutildah         |   318849|  1407|          227|

That's it. I'm only
Writing posts in haiku form
Cryptohunter sucks.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: xtraelv on November 07, 2019, 03:15:40 AM
[
Code:
UserName         |WordCount|Merits|WordsPerMerit|
-----------------|---------|------|-------------|
xtraelv          |   221501|  1333|          166|


Not too bad considering that as a dyslexic, life served me melons.
But I just make melonade.
Rely on spellcheck,  use preview about 20 times before posting and then edit it about 5 times to remove the obvious mistakes I missed.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: suchmoon on November 07, 2019, 03:59:28 AM
Rely on spellcheck,  use preview about 20 times before posting and then edit it about 5 times to remove the obvious mistakes I missed.

I notice my errors only after they've been quoted at least twice.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TheNewAnon135246 on November 07, 2019, 07:53:36 AM

Code:
UserName         |WordCount|Merits|WordsPerMerit|
-----------------|---------|------|-------------|
cryptohunter     |   411775|   156|         2640|
The-One-Above-All|   241298|    24|        10054|


So CH/TOAO has written 653,073 words since the introduction of the merit system. Assuming he is average (40 words per minute) he spent 16,326 minutes/272,11 hours/11,33 days to write posts that nobody bothers to read past the first 10 words. That's really, really sad.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TMAN on November 07, 2019, 09:07:27 AM

Code:
UserName         |WordCount|Merits|WordsPerMerit|
-----------------|---------|------|-------------|
TheNewAnon135246 |    38740|   793|           49|
Foxpup           |    36273|   693|           52|
TMAN             |   109224|  1039|          105|
suchmoon         |   398738|  3090|          129|
Lauda            |   143910|   873|          165|
xtraelv          |   221501|  1333|          166|
o_e_l_e_o        |   477731|  2842|          168|
nutildah         |   318849|  1407|          227|
LoyceV           |  2299963|  3873|          594|
cryptohunter     |   411775|   156|         2640|
The-One-Above-All|   241298|    24|        10054|

so I am 100x more effective than TAA...

ill take that - I wonder how many cunts/fucks per merit I earn?


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: xtraelv on November 07, 2019, 09:59:47 AM

Code:
UserName         |WordCount|Merits|WordsPerMerit|
-----------------|---------|------|-------------|
TheNewAnon135246 |    38740|   793|           49|
Foxpup           |    36273|   693|           52|
TMAN             |   109224|  1039|          105|
suchmoon         |   398738|  3090|          129|
Lauda            |   143910|   873|          165|
xtraelv          |   221501|  1333|          166|
o_e_l_e_o        |   477731|  2842|          168|
nutildah         |   318849|  1407|          227|
LoyceV           |  2299963|  3873|          594|
cryptohunter     |   411775|   156|         2640|
The-One-Above-All|   241298|    24|        10054|

so I am 100x more effective than TAA...

ill take that - I wonder how many cunts/fucks per merit I earn?

Or you have a limited vocabulary that consists primarily of 4 letter words ?  ;D

If you had left out the swearwords you might have beaten foxpup.

But would it then still be poetry ?

Quoting the text you are replying to will also increase the word count. If you quote TOAA or CH text then you'll have a much higher word count without any effort.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Foxpup on November 07, 2019, 10:37:37 AM
Or you have a limited vocabulary that consists primarily of 4 letter words ?  ;D

If you had left out the swearwords you might have beaten foxpup.
Oh, please. Everyone knows I wouldn't have earned half as many merits had I kept my cunts and fucks to myself. ;)

Well, it's just the one cunt, actually. But it did bring in 82 merits and counting! Thanks, c******unter!


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 07, 2019, 12:43:04 PM

ZERO achievements and have made no REAL lasting difference to this movement, still supporting high level scammers whilst selectively choosing to pick on lower level scammers , playing whack a mole whilst virtue signalling for merits

pushing a control system that is undeniably damaging for this movement

net negative low functioning dreg



so to recap

Compiling other peoples history for merits

Playing whack a mole with small fry 2 bit scammers that can't fight back ( high profile like who? which projects do they run?)

The scammers you guys focus on (rather than yourselves or the largest scammers that are responsible for taking 99.99% of innocent members money) are only taking scraps from the most greedy and most stupid. This is largely pointless and a waste of fucking time. Of you all only suchmoon has really ever tried to take on a reasonably large project head on that has any real support behind it, but she has since taken to supporting undeniable scammers and punishing whistle blowers, so that negates any prior good work on her part . The rest of you scamming scum have been supporting scams and profiting from them since you got here and fighting AGAINST real scam hunters until you and your projects were branded scams/scammers they will remain so in the minds of many members here. Yes, laudaM, nutildah, pharmacist, and the other scum bags that had your noses in the scam troughs for profit, supporting the LARGEST scams whilst virtue signalling by going after 2 bit scammers and con men that will just pop up again or be replaced as soon as they are temp taken out.

Mega threads of pointless garbage taking the piss out of people that the divs posting there believe are slightly dumber than they are, I mean your posts from this thread should be there ... the  immediate self debunking and other excuses, the entire pattern of jumping from one dumb debunked argument to the next. Most peoples posts in your MEGA THREAD are poverty stricken uneducated kids trying to get some scraps from the shitty sig campaigns where the bunch of low functioning SCAMMER pals of yours who have self elected themselves to take all the LIONS share of best slots whilst colluding to crush free speech.

Working on ways to help people not get scammed by exchanges with LAFU did  you say?  okay well good luck with that one, perhaps not using the exchanges lafu works for and is pushing people towards could be in the guide near the start.

"you are surrounded by legends; phenomenal successes and catastrophic failures"  

"your speech and actions to be controlled by undeniable scammers and catastrophic failures"  that would be more of a fair warning and more useful when signing up now.

" You will be surrounded by catastrophic failures trying to prevent you having phenomenal success"

Lol at spell checking and adjusting 5 x ----------- hammer it out and let these dregs have it dirty and think themselves fortunate to have it at all.


The morons here have not noticed their self awarded basis of value has been crushed

The reader should note, that they are claiming it is surprising that the people who give out all the majority merits who are the same scamming scum and scammer supporters that I am calling out correctly as scammers and scammers supporters have not given us much merit for our posts about THEM.... I wonder why we do not have many merits LOL LOL LOL
Also the scammers and scammer supporters giving out all the merits ....GET THEIR MERITS FROM EACH OTHER MOSTLY hahahhaha



Theymos you say? well yes he managed to not destroy the forum for many years, but has now set in place his OWN IMPROVEMENTS over what he was left with.  

Which undeniably enables scammers to reward themselves with :

1. being able to scam without punishment
2. be rewarded for scamming
3. be rewarded for crushing free speech
4. make sure only they are eligible for the highest paid sigs and other rev streams
5. control now the volume of your posts and the amount of attention your words receive
6. entrench them with these powers that only they can choose to relinquish
7. removes all accountability for their actions except to each other who have a vested interest in never punishing each other.


I mean he himself feels it fine for undeniable scammers to silence their whistle blowers and broker some back room deals to have these scammers red trusts removed.


So it's good that he managed not to destroy the forum for a number of years, and his " stated" views seem in line with the movement we all want to see flourish. But are they really? actions speak louder than words as they say.

We have moved from pro theymos to neutral in light of the fact that rather than rolling back the influence of the scammy merit cancer he has simply provides more and more rewards to undeniable scammers and scum that he must be fully aware control merit/dt.

Speaking with satoshi then using anti satoshi principles in his governance structures is not something to entirely boast about. I am sure satoshi would agree. If it was not deliberate then that does not essential alter the final result does it.

Our achievements are clear, fighting for transparent rules that ensure all members are given equal opportunities. I mean I don't believe cryptohunter has been shy of mentioning "some" of his achievements, I don't think the scammers and scam pushers have been silent about how they feel about that .  Let me know when any of you start a war with a HUGE entrenched scam with 100's if not 1000s of supporters, and then with a few people that are willing to help, crush and crush and crush their lies and bullshit in public, LIES pushed by laudaM and his band of scum bags more than any others, until a project that was arguably about to push BITCOIN from top spot ( and still reached number 2 in light of the fact of half the board now screaming it was a scam)  had to offer a  2 000 000 000 dollar air drop as compensation and become synonymous with scamming and lying about their insta/premine.  

 That was just 1 massive entrenched corrupt scam surrounded by an army of scam supporting scum like laudaM ( who later said he was sorry and he was new for supporting such a turd before again going rogue).  There have been many he was first to crush in public.  Never noticed his central points were debunked either crushing that paid of scum bag spoetnik (prior good scam hunter) to a point he squeaked and ran off. Nobody here can stand against The True Legend  once you have been identified as a scammer , you will all be known as scammers and scammer supporters in the end. The systems of control and meta board can not protect you from the truth being known, although MERIT is certainly a very powerful tool for scammers to garner (fake) support, that is not to be underestimated at all.  n  Hence we will do all that is possible to destroy it's credibility until it is fixed. Now that theymos has given the volume control over to merit also then that is just another critical mistake in his legacy.

There is no greater achievement than crushing scammers and scams at the highest levels whilst pushing for transparent rules that ensure fair treatment of all members.

You dare not even tackle the biggest scams, you simply virtue signal going after tiny 2 bit lone scammers, to justify your own positions from which you scam from and support fellow scamming pals...

Good luck though because now they have the " ONLY COMMENTS" defense you are going to be fucked...hahah


Keep posting your low functioning spew merit cyclers and we will just keep pulling you to pieces in public.


tourettes poet,  haha keep screaming " merit score" then running away from answering if you are were scamming in that auction nor presenting any posts of great value for us to laugh at ,you poor miscreant.

It seems though pointing out your tourettes in public has certainly helped you control your symptoms a little better haha but your poetry is suffering of course.

LOL at all those that ignore, don't respond, not interested, don't read any of it ..... who know every fucking thing we post and are always there to bump our valuable threads,and instantly appear when mentioned. Well done morons.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: xtraelv on November 07, 2019, 01:51:37 PM

Compiling other peoples history for merits


That must be one of the dumbest things you have said.

https://i.imgur.com/RMf0Ei3.png

https://i.imgur.com/86fukyI.jpg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NY3DrA7tJFk



2 fighters

above all - I will fight you anywhere any place including RIGHT NOW.

http://www.globalfight.com/ [NSFW]


Yeah...right...seems perfectly normal....at the laughing academy...



Isn't vouching for yourself using an alt kinda like commenting on your own auction that is run by someone else ?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5139179.msg50890361#msg50890361
Quote from: The-One-Above-All
Who would transact with cryptohunter?? Well since he  purchased nxt the day after launch, was an original nem stake holder, a launch day miner for the majority of wave 1 alts, picked 6 of the top 10 rising coins in the last wave and has threads started by others thanking him for his tips that turned them from nothing to millionaires. Then I guess that is not going to be much of a scam risk since he never bothered to buy or sell anything here and is already wealthy. Can you show even 1 instance of anywhere where cryptohunter has any financially motivated dirt on him?? NO because he always fights for others to have a fair shot at things.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 07, 2019, 03:18:40 PM




Isn't vouching for yourself using an alt kinda like commenting on your own auction that is run by someone else ?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5139179.msg50890361#msg50890361
Quote from: The-One-Above-All
Who would transact with cryptohunter?? Well since he  purchased nxt the day after launch, was an original nem stake holder, a launch day miner for the majority of wave 1 alts, picked 6 of the top 10 rising coins in the last wave and has threads started by others thanking him for his tips that turned them from nothing to millionaires. Then I guess that is not going to be much of a scam risk since he never bothered to buy or sell anything here and is already wealthy. Can you show even 1 instance of anywhere where cryptohunter has any financially motivated dirt on him?? NO because he always fights for others to have a fair shot at things.

Kinda only to a fucking moron like you who thinks having

Observable instances of undeniable scamming  is KINDA the same as having no evidence that some ever kidnapped a giraffe

hahaha

Of course it seems the same to a scammer supporting piece of retarded moron you., that issue you have with your mind jumbling up all the letters and numbers ....well, I think although spell checker and all that has helped, there is no " REASONING CHECKER" yet built into this board... 1/ there is no undeniable proof AT ALL that we are cryptohunter and is IMPOSSIBLE TO PROVE because we are not. and ANYONE can voice observable instances of independently verifiable information without deceiving anyone they simply verify it for themselves, 3. there is no direct financial gain, to our knowledge he has never traded on this forum except that nxt trade years ago and is not a trader.

I mean the fact your comparison falls splat on its face a 1/ and there are other huge hurdles to allow any kind of fair comparison then look like a complete fucking retard all over again. Your excuses get more funny with each new attempt.

Remember we are dealing here with

UNDENIABLE independently verifiable  observable instances of scamming.

MORE EXCUSES FOR SCAMMING EVERYONE.

Keep them coming you filthy scammer supporting piece of shit.

xtra elv  ....LOL besides the old " JUST COMMENTS" defense is always there for real scammers now.  

xtraelv was tman scamming on that auction or not? YES OR NO


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TMAN on November 07, 2019, 03:23:43 PM
TAA I shit on you like the whores who shat on Jogn McAfee on his hammock, just move on and accept defeat.

I am a greater opponent than you will ever be. I have friends and colleagues - even QS thinks you are a small time Pajeet.

when will theymos just hurry up and ban you?


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Lauda on November 07, 2019, 03:37:04 PM
when will theymos just hurry up and ban you?
I really don't understand what's holding theymos back here...
It's due to a disease called: modern-day, progressive, liberalism. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Look it up.

Anyone with a completely sane mind would have removed OP permanently a long time ago.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: LFC_Bitcoin on November 07, 2019, 03:40:33 PM
when will theymos just hurry up and ban you?
I really don't understand what's holding theymos back here...
It's due to a disease called: modern-day, progressive, liberalism. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Look it up.

Anyone with a completely sane mind would have removed OP permanently a long time ago.

He’ll just come back on another IP address with a new account to ruin everybody's experience here once again.  

Banning him will just piss him off more & he’ll come back to troll once again with his observable proofs etc.

**Yawn**


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Lauda on November 07, 2019, 03:44:29 PM
He’ll just come back on another IP address with a new account to ruin everybody's experience here once again.  

Banning him will just piss him off more & he’ll come back to troll once again with his observable proofs etc.

**Yawn**
This is utter and complete bullshit. Anyone with more experience administrating or managing anything than a 3yr old toddler is able to ban children like CH and its repeated alts, trivially easy. He does not posses any valuable skills whatsoever and poses absolutely NO PROBLEM in comparison to the shit that had to be handled during my former mod days.

Theymos has lost himself in his own liberal confirmation bias, and growing ego makes it hard for him (well, this is the case for most people) to admit that he is wrong (and clearly, even harder to make complete stance changes). Don't worry he isn't special, he's just like 99.9% of the rest of you folk. Sad, but it is what it is.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TMAN on November 07, 2019, 03:53:13 PM
posses any valuable skills whatsoever

I request OBSERVEABLE proof of the value that CH/TAA brings to this forum.

I challenge TAA/CH to a debate - initially they must provide 36,000 words of proof with an average of 0.1 merit per word in the posts

should that not happen then I must ask for Lauda to be the adjudicator

stop running from me TAA you smelly used tampon

failure to adhere to my request is proof that you dumpster dive to find children's diapers to sniff


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 07, 2019, 03:53:41 PM
TAA I shit on you like the whores who shat on Jogn McAfee on his hammock, just move on and accept defeat.

I am a greater opponent than you will ever be. I have friends and colleagues - even QS thinks you are a small time Pajeet.

when will theymos just hurry up and ban you?

Ah, the tourettes is coming back, that's good.

Err no Tman you are a low functioning scammer, who can not even deny it.

Were you scamming on that auction Tman or not??  because it seems impossible to deny.

I want your explanation of the entire auction scam as it unfolded.

Tman it is a simple question:  Were you scamming on that auction or not?

YES OR NO

see if you say NO we need your explanation. Hurry up you pathetic low functioning miscreant.  Stop lying you have any friends, you're laudas bitch.

Even theymos has to EXCLUDE you because just ignoring your placement on DT would look terrible.

You have no ability to debate or argue, that is why you just start screaming your childish pathetic spew all over the place.

Tman, take a look at yourself and be realistic.

1. you can not present any kind of sensible argument that stands up to scrutiny can you?
2. You are undeniably a scammer ( your own confirmation)
3. You are undeniably a trust abuser ( your own admission)
4. You can not present ANY post as an example of some original thought provoking contribution
5. You can not present even 1 achievement that really made any difference here ( except scamming and supporting scammers above you)
6.  You are undeniably net negative and worthless
7. The points above demonstrate clearly you are low functioning


You have NEVER won an arguement or debate against us and never could hope to. It would be like putting a mentally and physically disabled infant against a world champion undefeated fighter.

Even funnier, you who claim QS is a scammer, and claimed what he said is to be trusted.... now bring some apparent claim from the person you insist we can not trust.

This is the standard of morons on DT.  Honestly Tman you are not our main priority because you do not have the capacity to cause much damage , you are simply far too stupid hence why although you have done less that lauda and others, the strongest and most undeniable example of scamming is against you. Lauda and nutildah have also by their own words boxed themselves in to undeniable scamming, but you are the easiest one to crush. Lauda is slightly more slimey and nutildah is on observably and undeniably guilty of willing scam facilitating for pay , although one could argue if you claim by your own words you are willing to do what you consider is EVIL for pay then you would be KINDA getting up to laudas level.

Now try to digest some of that before you start fantasizing about where you take your next " shat" because I suspect it is in your over sized nappy that your bulgarian hag has to change far more than once per day.

The very notion that a total imbecile like yourself is even worthy of ANYTHING other than being used as an example of how fucking stupid theymos's design is to allow someone as low function and devoid of all reasoning to be a merit source and DT .... is ridiculous.

Come on fool.... present 5 of your best original thought provoking posts..... hurry up you drooling imbecile. We are always open to degrading scammer FOR real in public.

Come on AUCTION SCAMMER, produce you best 5 original thought provoking posts for some analysis.... or 5 of your best achievements here that made any REAL Difference.


@lauda you dirty croatian dog

Time to bring a little more focus to you soon as well, seeping back in I see.

Why are you not banned? theymos only semi flushed you with a blacklisting from DT1. Everyone knows you are the most financially dangerous croatian filthy piece of shit on this board. You turd world euro trash skank.

Look at them crying for the ban hammer..... Yes please ban him now that is is actually demonstrating our scamming is undeniable and that he is calling us out on our own scams.... we dare not even answer yes or no..

haha

Lauda says, of course you can ban him. ANYONE that presents observable instances of our scamming is simply going to need a ban because they are CH or TOAA.

When they have run out of excuses to be torn to shreds then they come with the BEGGING AND CRYING for the truth to be silence via a BAN.

Imagine if you could really ban the truth. Sadly that will never happen.


haha at nutildah https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5190369.20 crying for help from daddy theymos, please shelter us scammers MORE than you already are he begs. Prevent the truth being told about us 100% please. hahah


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: xtraelv on November 07, 2019, 04:03:06 PM
when will theymos just hurry up and ban you?

I really don't understand what's holding theymos back here... CH contributes nothing but a verbal AIDS to the forum.

At least Anonymint presented some high-minded, lofty, existential ideas that were at least 0.1% interesting by the end of his endless meanderings. CH presents a ruptured rectum at the end of his.

Yeah I'm disappointed with his drivel. I had hoped that he had more skill. What a let down.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TMAN on November 07, 2019, 04:06:56 PM
~

would ali have to prove anything to a challenger? no - you are the jumped up pajeet - I am on DT, I have more merits than you can wank over and I have many many successful trades on this forum oh.. and the biggest kicker - I actually have mates here.

so bring me observable proof of your usefulness here.

bring it or without it by association you are admitting that you suck off donkeys for fun

once again lauda as adjudicator, should you fail to my challenge then by default you are asking Theymos for a permaban and you are personally requesting that suchmoon shits through your letterbox



Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 07, 2019, 04:13:15 PM
when will theymos just hurry up and ban you?

I really don't understand what's holding theymos back here... CH contributes nothing but a verbal AIDS to the forum.

At least Anonymint presented some high-minded, lofty, existential ideas that were at least 0.1% interesting by the end of his endless meanderings. CH presents a ruptured rectum at the end of his.

Yeah I'm disappointed with his drivel. I had hoped that he had more skill. What a let down.

I'm sure you are disappointed with getting your posts torn to piece and made to look like you have far greater cognitive issues than dyslexia ...haha looks more like serious mental damage driven by the need to feltch the ass holes of your scamming pals whilst virtue signalling for some kind of validation to your pathetic existence.

What a fucking idiot.

You were just humiliated ...your excuses crushed, your arguments pulled to pieces, your comparison demonstrated as laughable, YOUR TERROR TO ANSWER YES OR NO to the undeniable scamming of you scumbag pals. Your achievements put in their correct context and demonstrated as PATHETIC and you have made ZERO real difference to this movement and are clearly net negative.

If you disagree then present it. Now do not run away, you are my useful idiot...well you all are really but you are the new favorite.

Nutildah is pretending to have understood the technical points that anonymint produced, yet  nutildah will have us believe he has gone from NEM STAKE holder and early DASH adopter to begging for 0.02BTC loans hahahaahaha

What happened ANTI MIDAS.. tell us how did you manage to be given 300BTC and early dash adoption and now have ZERO...hahah lend him 0.02btc someone so he can stfu and stop spamming his gambling sig and posting his begging and crying everywhere haha

WELL perhaps you need to have listened a little more closely because we followed some of his advice and made fortunes hahahhahhahahh

Nutildah the ANTI_MIDAS  ....hahah


~

would ali have to prove anything to a challenger? no - you are the jumped up pajeet - I am on DT, I have more merits than you can wank over and I have many many successful trades on this forum oh.. and the biggest kisser - I actually have no mates here.

so bring me observable proof of your usefulness here.

bring it or without it by association you are admitting that you allowed my ugly daughters to suck you off

once again lauda as adjudicator, should you fail to my challenge then by default you are asking Theymos for a permaban and you are personally requesting that suchmoon shits through your letterbox



BUT WAIT - before we entertain your laughable claims and fantasies

were you scamming on that auction or not?

YES OR NO

If NO then how so?  Please give details and explain in public so we can analyse it.


The fact we are highlighting UNDENIABLE SCAMMERS (you and your dirty skanky scamming pals) that are infesting positions of TRUST and taking all the best REV STREAMS and trying to CRUSH FREE SPEECH...

That is undeniable evidence of our Undeniable value here.  

I think we just debunked clearly the credibility of merit scores and validation of REAL VALUE.  I mean you having any merits of course did that job already hahahaha


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: suchmoon on November 07, 2019, 05:10:47 PM
Quoting the text you are replying to will also increase the word count. If you quote TOAA or CH text then you'll have a much higher word count without any effort.

I'm excluding quotes so TMAN's cunts are 100% his own:
Code:
UserName|WordCount|Merits|WordsPerMerit|
--------|---------|------|-------------|
TMAN    |    29810|   205|          145|

(for posts containing "cunt" or "fuck")


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Quickseller on November 07, 2019, 06:02:19 PM
TAA I shit on you like the whores who shat on Jogn McAfee on his hammock, just move on and accept defeat.

I am a greater opponent than you will ever be. I have friends and colleagues - even QS thinks you are a small time Pajeet.

when will theymos just hurry up and ban you?
The OP needs to start discussing other topics. His opinion has been made known to everyone and he should move on.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TheNewAnon135246 on November 07, 2019, 06:07:12 PM
TAA I shit on you like the whores who shat on Jogn McAfee on his hammock, just move on and accept defeat.

I am a greater opponent than you will ever be. I have friends and colleagues - even QS thinks you are a small time Pajeet.

when will theymos just hurry up and ban you?
The OP needs to start discussing other topics. His opinion has been made known to everyone and he should move on.

He is only capable of repeating himself over and over.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 07, 2019, 06:21:32 PM
TAA I shit on you like the whores who shat on Jogn McAfee on his hammock, just move on and accept defeat.

I am a greater opponent than you will ever be. I have friends and colleagues - even QS thinks you are a small time Pajeet.

when will theymos just hurry up and ban you?
The OP needs to start discussing other topics. His opinion has been made known to everyone and he should move on.

There is no OPINION where observable instances are concerned and there are clearly defined universally accepted definitions the criteria of which have been clearly met.

Tman was claiming you are a scammer and that your words can not be trusted (not that we share that view) must be getting desperate to reference (err something you did not actually say) something you have apparently said.

I mean it is clear he is telling me NOT to accept your words are true though previously....so hmmmm tricky one...haha

I will just do what the fuck I want and keep applying pressure over time and keeping max exposure on the scammers that have infested DT and their supporters. Where of course it is on topic and relevant and provides value to the reader that does not want to get scammed.

I am certainly branching out to other topics of interest that I stumble across. I particularly like the new thread provided by xtraelv under the guise of IRONY ON BITCOINTALK. He is a sneaky one..haha  what have you scammers done to this guy to upset him so?? haha

I have no idea why Tman is calling upon another person who has PROVEN  that tman was involved in a serious extortion attempt with fellow scammer Lauda. Desperate times call for desperate measure though I guess.

Haha I tman call my first witness to defend against my auction scamming.....I call the guy...errr ...the  guy who proved I'm an extortionist and fellow scammer supporter....hhahahaah  weeeee out of the frying pan into ......

Ok tman ...err is that though not only the guy that proven you are an extortionist but the same guy you said is a scammer and you can not trust a word he says ???

Bitcointalk is the BEST... you can NOT get entertainment like this for free elsewhere. Nowhere else do these dummies exist that will gladly take the piss out of themselves 24/7 on command for free ( well to us) others may have to  pay them dearly with their life savings...hahaha





Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: xtraelv on November 07, 2019, 08:18:52 PM
The OP needs to start discussing other topics. His opinion has been made known to everyone and he should move on.

The OP is unable to move on. He cannot even construct a reply that responds directly to the conversation. He is a scratched record permanently on repeat that occasionally moves to the next scratch.

Undeniable proof, click. Undeniable proof, click. 


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Quickseller on November 07, 2019, 08:26:21 PM
The OP needs to start discussing other topics. His opinion has been made known to everyone and he should move on.

The OP is unable to move on. He cannot even construct a reply that responds directly to the conversation. He is a scratched record permanently on repeat that occasionally moves to the next scratch.

Undeniable proof, click. Undeniable proof, click.  
If he cannot move on, then it may be time to lock this thread and any future similar threads.

I would invite the OP to discuss various debates in the P&S sub.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: xtraelv on November 07, 2019, 08:28:22 PM
The OP needs to start discussing other topics. His opinion has been made known to everyone and he should move on.

The OP is unable to move on. He cannot even construct a reply that responds directly to the conversation. He is a scratched record permanently on repeat that occasionally moves to the next scratch.

Undeniable proof, click. Undeniable proof, click. 
If he cannot move on, then it may be time to lock this thread and any future similar threads.

That is probably the smartest thing I've seen written in the whole thread.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TMAN on November 07, 2019, 08:35:54 PM
Quoting the text you are replying to will also increase the word count. If you quote TOAA or CH text then you'll have a much higher word count without any effort.

I'm excluding quotes so TMAN's cunts are 100% his own:
Code:
UserName|WordCount|Merits|WordsPerMerit|
--------|---------|------|-------------|
TMAN    |    29810|   205|          145|

(for posts containing "cunt" or "fuck")

ha ha ha - your 50,000 word posts get less merits than me calling "someone" well mainly you a cunt.

what does that tell you? ill let you know what it means - the forum as a whole thinks you are a cunt, Theymos thinks you are a waste of space - fuck I bet Satoshi wants to come back here just to call you a knob cheese sallower

just fuck off you silly pajeet


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 07, 2019, 08:58:14 PM
The OP needs to start discussing other topics. His opinion has been made known to everyone and he should move on.

The OP is unable to move on. He cannot even construct a reply that responds directly to the conversation. He is a scratched record permanently on repeat that occasionally moves to the next scratch.

Undeniable proof, click. Undeniable proof, click.  
If he cannot move on, then it may be time to lock this thread and any future similar threads.

I would invite the OP to discuss various debates in the P&S sub.

There are no grounds on which to lock this thread. This is an open discussion of who is the most OBSERVABLY AND UNDENIABLY financially dangerous individual on Default trust.

ANY ATTEMPT to lock this thread would immediately be investigated and the person locking it should be viewed as fully complicit.

I will then be calling a rep thread on theymos and the mods for observable double standards. They had no issue letting the troll poll proceed and there was NO evidence for their claims which we actual debunked when calling ANY of them to present the the false or incorrect information we had presented. NOBODY presented any.

This poll is fully validated with undeniable observable instances.

Yes let it go, let scammers get away with it, let them abuse you account.

What on earth is wrong with you ? what a pussy attitude everyone has around here.

You can allow yourself to be given red trust if you like by scammers and let them get away with it.

Sadly that is not going to be happening with us. We are not interested in sucking up to them to regain favor like you. We will be crushing each and everyone of them.

Lock threads with vital and  important information that can prevent scamming you say??  sorry , no thanks.

We're starting to think you're rather slimy actually. If you have an alt in that poll then tough shit, it is either a scammer or scammer supporter.

Let's censor only non scammers that present observable instances that undeniably demonstrate we have scammers on DT?  is that what you are saying QS??

Now stay the fuck away from derailing our threads with your pussy slimy cowardly suggestions. Slimy little snake..

Marooned out on politics .....no thanks. This is their fav board for getting in theymos's ear with their  ....

pssst  I'll be a merit source theymos..

psssst  don't you think we should raise it to 250 merits theymos

pssst  how about we turn the volume down on people that dont get x merits per week

psttt  let's lock threads with any undeniable evidence of us scamming other members theymos

psssst  whistle blowing is worthy of red trust isn't theymos

Fuck off you snake, we had believed you were not as scammy as the others here but don't make us review that position.  We are concerned you want to HIDE observable instances of scamming from view.

Explain yourself now, else fuck off and stop derailing our thread with your stupid ideas.

Don't attempt to use us to worm your way back on to DT or into theymos's favor.  

Theymos made this fucked up mess and allowed these undeniable scammers in entrenched positions of trust. He must fix it or else must be reminded frequently that that is exactly what has happened here.

Man you you fucking snake, you like those kids at school who get slapped around then try to side with the bullies when they try to pick on the next kid .. hoping to become their bitch who get some small scraps of favor.

That's not going to happen with us. You will be viewed as a fucking coward and as hostile if you keep presenting your dumb fuck suggestions.

Now explain WHY this should be locked clearly or fuck off.

You go make some threads in the politics forum ... we may join you there but we are not locking this thread.  

What purpose would locking it serve? if you don't want to read this thread then don't enter it.

I note you're one of the biggest and most pathetic ass kissers when it come to theymos. Surely even he does not respect total and utter servile and pathetic slobbering does he?

Better he hears the truth for his own good and the good of this movement.

@xtraWIMP  wanting it locked because he is now revealed as a scammer supporter. This would not have been CLEAR and UNDENIABLE had the thread been locked.

META is bursting with scammers and scammer supporters. Haha the entire thing should be isolated from the rest of the community.

Bunches of nobodies that I never heard of been here for years and years and zero achievements except a long rap sheet of scamming. hahah

Yep lock all future threads presenting observable scamming taking place with in DT .. great idea QS.

No more double standards allowed. Troll poll is fine here, DT dirty turds poll is fine here. Simple as that. This is far more valuable and indeed does demonstrate to theymos that default trust and merit is entirely broken and indeed dangerous.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll -The-One-Above-All has clean turds.
Post by: xtraelv on November 07, 2019, 10:25:45 PM
No more double standards allowed. Troll poll is fine here, DT dirty turds poll is fine here. Simple as that. This is far more valuable and indeed does demonstrate to theymos that default trust and merit is entirely broken and indeed dangerous.

No more double standards. Except when it comes to self vouching for his own alt. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170789.msg53010865#msg53010865)

Or accusing moderators for not enforcing (non existent) rules (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5181848.msg52988346#msg52988346) in an attempt to censor people whose opinions he doesn't like.



Bitcointalk is the BEST... you can NOT get entertainment like this for free elsewhere. Nowhere else do these dummies exist that will gladly take the piss out of themselves 24/7 on command for free ( well to us) others may have to  pay them dearly with their life savings...hahaha


Proof this troll is just here for the Lulz

Never wrestle with pigs. You both get covered in shit (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170789.0).  The difference being - the pig loves it.

TOAA loves the shit (Just look at all the references he makes to faeces, sexual body fluids) and fantasies about handling wrestling men. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170789.msg53005602#msg53005602)

https://i.imgur.com/JQi89sp.jpg

Let me save you the hassle of the word wall. I've turned the scratched record on again.

Quote from: The-One-Above-All
Undeniable proof, click. Undeniable proof, click.... Let me look at your balls while little bears chant, click...dirty turds, click...I win and you are dirty turds,click. Undeniable proof, click. Undeniable proof, click

Do you notice how he refers to "dirty turds" - as opposed to his own "clean turds" that he bathes in.

It is not "free speech" it is merit-less word walls that takes up paid server space.

Sorry - I forgot. TOAA always has to have the last word without responding to anything that was said.

Quote from: The-One-Above-All
Undeniable proof, click. Undeniable proof, click.... dirty turds, click.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll -The-One-Above-All has clean turds.
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 07, 2019, 11:58:02 PM
No more double standards allowed. Troll poll is fine here, DT dirty turds poll is fine here. Simple as that. This is far more valuable and indeed does demonstrate to theymos that default trust and merit is entirely broken and indeed dangerous.

No more double standards. Except when it comes to self vouching for his own alt. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170789.msg53010865#msg53010865)

Or accusing moderators for not enforcing (non existent) rules (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5181848.msg52988346#msg52988346) in an attempt to censor people whose opinions he doesn't like.



Bitcointalk is the BEST... you can NOT get entertainment like this for free elsewhere. Nowhere else do these dummies exist that will gladly take the piss out of themselves 24/7 on command for free ( well to us) others may have to  pay them dearly with their life savings...hahaha


Proof this troll is just here for the Lulz

Never wrestle with pigs. You both get covered in shit (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170789.0).  The difference being - the pig loves it.

TOAA loves the shit (Just look at all the references he makes to faeces, sexual body fluids) and fantasies about handling wrestling men. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170789.msg53005602#msg53005602)

https://i.imgur.com/JQi89sp.jpg

Let me save you the hassle of the word wall. I've turned the scratched record on again.

Quote from: The-One-Above-All
Undeniable proof, click. Undeniable proof, click.... Let me look at your balls while little bears chant, click...dirty turds, click...I win and you are dirty turds,click. Undeniable proof, click. Undeniable proof, click

Do you notice how he refers to "dirty turds" - as opposed to his own "clean turds" that he bathes in.

It is not "free speech" it is merit-less word walls that takes up paid server space.

Sorry - I forgot. TOAA always has to have the last word without responding to anything that was said.

Quote from: The-One-Above-All
Undeniable proof, click. Undeniable proof, click.... dirty turds, click.


Look, I know you are possibly trying to help us bust these scammers by bumping and dragging them through the mud over and over. Forcing us to keep slapping you around with their observable and undeniable scamming deeds that you WILL not agree are scamming yes or no. The fact you keep side tracking is a good ploy in making it worse for them because you want them to seem guilty right (that's why you don't just say no) but saying yes won't have the same impact because it will no longer require us to keep presenting the observable instances of his undeniable scamming over and over. That "only comments " defense was a classic, i mean how do you think up these totally retarded defenses for scammers that would render all scamming null and void since they are just using comments too. That was a master stroke of course. That is the kind of super stupid defense that makes the entire premise that a defense is even possible in such an undeniable auction scam is ridiculous and insulting to the reader.

It's great, but when you start opening other threads that make it too obvious you are setting them up like that they will eventually start catching on. Keep it down a bit and only bump once it gets nearer the bottom of page 1. That way our shared goal of forcing the description of their scamming over and over and over does not lose its bite and become too familiar. Also can you please start opening more threads that give us an ontopic and relevant open to inject this into on other board.

That meriting of one liner insults with no supporting argument and zero real value is another good tactic, and allows us to use you as a useful idiot who become offended at getting humiliated and degraded by pure reason and logic and then uses the merit system on political grounds and will stretch to giving merit to ANY thing at all to get some small form of cathartic release. Excellent work.

haha

Now thanks again for now opening yourself up to allow me to both debunk all of your points and also humiliate you all over again, although the value of doing so it kind of diminishing since it happens to your every post right... try to make some neutral or sensible points that are not overly easy to make a laughing stock out of.

Too many immediate self debunkings and ironic (well those will be useful now we have a thread for them) fuck ups is a bit of a give away hehe

You points have been debunked but I know you want to give us another opportunity to degrade you further in public.

1. vouching for own alt point = No proof since that would be impossible as it is not true, presenting observable instances that are independently verifiable can be done by any person. You seem to want to discount undeniable observable instances of scamming where the scammer does not deny it (because again that would be impossible) but then grasp to theories that are equally as impossible to prove.  That is both funny and desperate ... as are most of your pathetic and retarded excuses and accusations.

2. claiming accusing mods for non existent rules in attempt to censor people.... again this is a moronic statement that we will be debunking when we get around to that low priority thread. However since you have just gone and given merit to this post.

Here she goes again, who put a dollar in the cunt?

Then again you will be our useful idiot for further demonstrating the clear double standards in moderation. Thanks but again don't make it too obvious.

3. Yes, bitcointalk is entertaining because imbeciles and low functioning dregs with no capacity for reason and debate make fools of themselves over and over when you simply put their posts under scrutiny. The FACT it is amusing they troll themselves whilst not even realizing it, is certainly NOT proof that I am trolling them. Well to a complete fool like you it may be proof of course.

4. Not sure about the dirty turds and clean turds... I guess as the saying goes you can not polish a turd. Hence we have no idea why you spell check your posts to prevent your dyslexia confusing people. I mean your posts are so convoluted and retarded, I think the only real value  could be the challenge of rearranging the letters in the correct order to form the words.  The rest of the mess you shart out ( need to get my shit quota in) I guess does have comedy value but since most here are too low functioning to appreciate how funny you are then only we would benefit. It is good that we lack empathy for scammer supporters else it would be sad rather than funny.

5. merit-less ( i think we debunked the validity of merit several thousand times already). But cling to that if it helps you feel you have to.

6. "Sorry - I forgot. TOAA always has to have the last word without responding to anything that was said"  

seems like you need to read our interactions back, we have responded to every moronic thing you have slobbered over this thread.

Watch this...

Why do you reply to this with a simple YES or NO. I mean what are you afraid of.... (fun playing this one is it not xtrahelper they will catch on soon though then you will be in trouble..haha those dumb scammers)

Remember just yes or no

Was tmans deliberate deception for direct financial gain scamming  YES OR NO.  

Please do not demonstrate you will reply without responding to that simple question because that would be ironic in view of your above claims.

or are you thinking ahead so we can put this on your irony of bitcointalk thread?  well do what you feel punishes these scammers the most.

thanks xtrauseful idiot. haha

also just give a quick update to the irony thread, we have tons more ready but don't want to double post, please update with your own find some of ours so you look extra bitchy and pathetic I know they will be difficult if not impossible to find. Do you best keep searching day and night. Your service is appreciated you are our fav useful idiot so far...well..perhaps.

The most important thing to remember though is... you xtraelv MUST have the last word on this thread. Whatever we say do NOT let us look like we bested you. Well obviously we always do on every post... but make is seem like you don't notice (like you are doing now) and keep coming back no matter what.




Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: actmyname on November 08, 2019, 12:26:41 AM
This thread is still going on, huh?


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll -The-One-Above-All is a gay wrestler.
Post by: xtraelv on November 08, 2019, 12:43:05 AM
I'm sure you are disappointed with getting your posts torn to piece and made to look like you have far greater cognitive issues than dyslexia ...haha looks more like serious mental damage driven by the need to feltch the ass holes of your scamming pals whilst virtue signalling for some kind of validation to your pathetic existence.

I highlighted some mistakes. I'm Dyslexic. What is your excuse ?

I had to look up what "feltch" meant and to learn about your alternative lifestyle.


1. vouching for own alt point = No proof since that would be impossible as it is not true, presenting observable instances that are independently verifiable can be done by any person. You seem to want to discount undeniable observable instances of scamming where the scammer does not deny it (because again that would be impossible) but then grasp to theories that are equally as impossible to prove.  That is both funny and desperate ... as are most of your pathetic and retarded excuses and accusations.

Easy to prove.

Is Cryptohunter an account that you or "we" ever had or have the password for ? Yes / No

2. claiming accusing mods for non existent rules in attempt to censor people.... again this is a moronic statement that we will be debunking when we get around to that low priority thread. However since you have just gone and given merit to this post.

My full response that has been there since 5 November (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5181848.msg52988346#msg52988346)

Q: Someone insulted me. Why aren't you deleting his post/thread?
A: Possible (since we don't have the time or resources to check) insults are also allowed as long as they contain any kind of constructive opinion, info or something else substantial and aren't off-topic. For example, posting something like "you are dumb" will be deleted as it contains no meaningful content. However, if the post is somewhere along the lines of "You are dumb. This is wrong because this website/thread/etc. has explained it's not right", it's in most cases accepted.

3. Yes, bitcointalk is entertaining because imbeciles and low functioning dregs with no capacity for reason and debate make fools of themselves over and over when you simply put their posts under scrutiny. The FACT it is amusing they troll themselves whilst not even realizing it, is certainly NOT proof that I am trolling them. Well to a complete fool like you it may be proof of course.

I see you are starting to get some self awareness.

4. Not sure about the dirty turds and clean turds... I guess as the saying goes you can not polish a turd. Hence we have no idea why you spell check your posts to prevent your dyslexia confusing people. I mean your posts are so convoluted and retarded, I think the only real value  could be the challenge of rearranging the letters in the correct order to form the words.  The rest of the mess you shart out ( need to get my shit quota in) I guess does have comedy value but since most here are too low functioning to appreciate how funny you are then only we would benefit. It is good that we lack empathy for scammer supporters else it would be sad rather than funny.

Perhaps you can learn about the use of a double negative (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_negative) and redundancy. (https://grammarist.com/redundancies/)

Quote from: The-Ass-Above-All
I don't need no education.

Describing a "dirty turd" implies that there is such thing as a "clean turd". Because if turds are dirty by definition you would not need to use the word dirty in the sentence.

5. merit-less ( i think we debunked the validity of merit several thousand times already). But cling to that if it helps you feel you have to.

Even unpopular characters in the forum get merit. Just shit posters don't get it. If you made one decent post with a well constructed argument, without expletives or personal attacks - it would most likely get merit.

Tag - some other dirty turd can talk to the TOAD "in the ring" so he can have homo-erotic fantasies about doing physical things to you. Just watch out for his hands - he likes balls and faecies.



Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TMAN on November 08, 2019, 07:51:56 AM
so bring me observable proof of your usefulness here.

bring it or without it by association you are admitting that you suck off donkeys for fun

so without any OBSERVEABLE proof of your usefulness here you have admitted that you suck donkey dick for entertainment.

/thread.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll -The-One-Above-All is a gay wrestler.
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 08, 2019, 01:24:12 PM
I'm sure you are disappointed with getting your posts torn to piece and made to look like you have far greater cognitive issues than dyslexia ...haha looks more like serious mental damage driven by the need to feltch the ass holes of your scamming pals whilst virtue signalling for some kind of validation to your pathetic existence.

I highlighted some mistakes. I'm Dyslexic. What is your excuse ?

I had to look up what "feltch" meant and to learn about your alternative lifestyle.


1. vouching for own alt point = No proof since that would be impossible as it is not true, presenting observable instances that are independently verifiable can be done by any person. You seem to want to discount undeniable observable instances of scamming where the scammer does not deny it (because again that would be impossible) but then grasp to theories that are equally as impossible to prove.  That is both funny and desperate ... as are most of your pathetic and retarded excuses and accusations.

Easy to prove.

Is Cryptohunter an account that you or "we" ever had or have the password for ? Yes / No

2. claiming accusing mods for non existent rules in attempt to censor people.... again this is a moronic statement that we will be debunking when we get around to that low priority thread. However since you have just gone and given merit to this post.

My full response that has been there since 5 November (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5181848.msg52988346#msg52988346)

Q: Someone insulted me. Why aren't you deleting his post/thread?
A: Possible (since we don't have the time or resources to check) insults are also allowed as long as they contain any kind of constructive opinion, info or something else substantial and aren't off-topic. For example, posting something like "you are dumb" will be deleted as it contains no meaningful content. However, if the post is somewhere along the lines of "You are dumb. This is wrong because this website/thread/etc. has explained it's not right", it's in most cases accepted.

3. Yes, bitcointalk is entertaining because imbeciles and low functioning dregs with no capacity for reason and debate make fools of themselves over and over when you simply put their posts under scrutiny. The FACT it is amusing they troll themselves whilst not even realizing it, is certainly NOT proof that I am trolling them. Well to a complete fool like you it may be proof of course.

I see you are starting to get some self awareness.

4. Not sure about the dirty turds and clean turds... I guess as the saying goes you can not polish a turd. Hence we have no idea why you spell check your posts to prevent your dyslexia confusing people. I mean your posts are so convoluted and retarded, I think the only real value  could be the challenge of rearranging the letters in the correct order to form the words.  The rest of the mess you shart out ( need to get my shit quota in) I guess does have comedy value but since most here are too low functioning to appreciate how funny you are then only we would benefit. It is good that we lack empathy for scammer supporters else it would be sad rather than funny.

Perhaps you can learn about the use of a double negative (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_negative) and redundancy. (https://grammarist.com/redundancies/)

Quote from: The-Ass-Above-All
I don't need no education.

Describing a "dirty turd" implies that there is such thing as a "clean turd". Because if turds are dirty by definition you would not need to use the word dirty in the sentence.

5. merit-less ( i think we debunked the validity of merit several thousand times already). But cling to that if it helps you feel you have to.

Even unpopular characters in the forum get merit. Just shit posters don't get it. If you made one decent post with a well constructed argument, without expletives or personal attacks - it would most likely get merit.

Tag - some other dirty turd can talk to the TOAD "in the ring" so he can have homo-erotic fantasies about doing physical things to you. Just watch out for his hands - he likes balls and faecies.



This is a great ploy trevlax, but don't do it with every post. Tman will never catch on but some of the others may.

This asking questions that were just explained a few posts ago is certainly a nice touch to add to your useful idiot repertoire, but not straight after your other  obvious bungles.  Spread your mistakes out make it seem more believable.

Ah the old feltching... yes now you have the correct term for what you are undeniably performing in public to you scammer masters.

Again with the accusing people of not answering your queries , then when they do and post their own direct questions you immediately and ironically avoid answering

Was tmans auction deception for direct financial gain SCAMMING  - YES OR NO??

Now don't be extra silly and go and say, well you have not answered the cryptohunter password question, because it is easy for the reader to look back and observe clearly you are refusing to answer our question THAT IS ON TOPIC and relevant since it relates to a DT member/ Dirty turd, and we are not going to indulge your off topic and irrelevant question (concerning a non DT member) until you have done so.

Now get on with answering our question before the scammers catch on to what we are really doing here.

Was tmans auction deception for direct financial gain SCAMMING  - YES OR NO??




@mant

Sorry to be giving you less attention than usual - well except to use you as a great example of an undeniable scammer.
However, whilst we have xldiv here with free unlimited bumps and WHOM provides far more helpful openings then you are just going to get the odd derisory put down when and where we feel like it. Since really your random tourettes infested baseless and random slobbering is not even that satisfying to poke fun at then, you see that until we require your bumps you can't expect any more than these crumbs for now. Hope you understand. haha




Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TMAN on November 08, 2019, 01:35:49 PM
so bring me observable proof of your usefulness here.

bring it or without it by association you are admitting that you suck off donkeys for fun

so without any OBSERVEABLE proof of your usefulness here you have admitted that you suck donkey dick for entertainment.

/thread.

yet again you are running away from my direct challenge, I require OBSERVEABLE proof of your usefulness here on the forum.

you are running like the scared beaten dog you are.

stop running from me

bring me OBSERVEABLE proof of you being useful

PAJEET


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 08, 2019, 02:35:43 PM
so bring me observable proof of your usefulness here.

bring it or without it by association you are admitting that you suck off donkeys for fun

so without any OBSERVEABLE proof of your usefulness here you have admitted that you suck donkey dick for entertainment.

/thread.

yet again you are running away from my direct challenge, I require OBSERVEABLE proof of your usefulness here on the forum.

you are running like the scared beaten dog you are.

stop running from me

bring me OBSERVEABLE proof of you being useful

PAJEET

The fact you are here crying and bleating like a little girl because I am presenting undeniable observable instances of your observable and undeniable auction scamming is all the proof one needs.

You likely missed the rules of the thread ... this is for the discussion ONLY regarding default trust members so you are again off topic trying to goad me into boasting about my undeniable usefulness.

I mean we are only starting off with low hanging fruit like you Tman because you are an easy target. You don't have the capacity to defend your actions ( well nobody really can from the position you have placed yourself in with such overt scamming, extorting, and self confessed trust abuse of whistle blowers) ..

Just getting warmed up. Although just triggering your tourettes and the outpouring of you broken and diseased mind is also something one can develop an aquired taste for if they can suppress their conscience in relation to the suffering and squirming of undeniable scammers.

Again tman let me ask you to look back and notice that you have failed to answer our ontopic and relevant question FIRST.

Were you scamming on that auction yes or no. If not explain why you feel you were not scamming??

Failure to answer looks ...........well ...........even you can see how it looks surely??  come on auction scammer just fess up and the pain will be over (temporarily)

Take your time tman, don't rush. Give your post some thought.

I was not scamming, I was..err

I was pretending the coin was not my coin and that I would by it if I did not have so many, so I could talk up the price and shout down and threaten other members giving fair appraisal so ..............input your reasons.

or just adopt the " only comments" defense that xtraelv your scammer supporting friend concocted to make your position look .....well rather bad to be fair.

Happy to give you a little more attention until our new helper returns, he can't run away because we have between us sneakily boxed ourselves into a last word scenario that looks like we are in a never ending battle, whilst really as you see he hands me more and more opportunities to recite their undeniable scamming observable instances and also provide hilarious excuses that demonstrate just how silly it would be to attempt excusing them...haha

So come on tmaN ... another cathartic expulsion of all that pent up scamming frustration rolled into a mass of tourettes laden swearing and sexually deviant fantasies to project over this forum like a never ending fountain of pajeet jizz , window lickers slobber , rancid vaginal fluids and anal excretions... hahaha

Go tourettes poet, some of your finest work is yet to come we feel. Just the correct amount of pressure must be applied though, don't want you to put quantity above quality. Pace yourself.

I mean one could argue that since much of your finest poetry is inspired by our good selves, then since that is so valuable that ALONE could be proof enough of our value here??

A lot to get through ( for you) so take your time. Really want to see a good effort this time auction scammer.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TMAN on November 08, 2019, 02:49:51 PM
~ZZZZ

I just masturbated whilst you failed to bring an OBSAERVABLE instance of you assisting anyone or bringing any value anywhere.

back on ignore small time.

xxxx


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 08, 2019, 08:36:27 PM
Observable instances of cryptopajeet being a dumb, insane cunt:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170789

Need more be said? The thrust of my argument: not really.

Just TRY to COUNTER us with your INANE LOGIC and YOU WILL BE DESTROYED.

xtraelv ??? just pretending to have run away??... to keep our ruse going a little longer??  got to time your reentry, I'll taunt you a bit more, then you burst back in  all fueled up, full of equally funny excuses and comparisons. I'm not expecting you to actually TOP the " only comments" defense but even so, do your uttermost.

Nutildah, we had speculated Tmans variant of mutated tourettes could have been contagious, those " protein" injections him and lauda give you from both ends together was never going to end well. How's living out there going? 0.02btc out there must go a bit further. Plus you have your writing talents to fall back on and dazzle the natives with.

Enjoying this poll and the new irony thread. Ha thought so. I think actually you have more claim to being entertaining than tman. I like how you at least try to present your low functioning garbage in a nicer format. Well, you did.  Or are you aiming for  your own nutildah poetry thread now too?

This poll
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1622642.5 is a little more difficult to follow, it seems to be about cryptohunter but then on further reading it looks like your scam facilitating for 0.3 BTC account selling thread, that you have sneakily edited to try to excuse your evil ways?

Hmm chud or chode...

Default trust member nutildah  ....has quite a ring to it....a very hollow ring now that I hear it. Oh, hold on,   I was just striking a piece of 2 by 4 across tmans skull repeatedly  that was what that sound was... haha  donk donk...haha

Just a small request... could you present the specific example of inane logic you are mistakenly referring to? I think you should stick around (until xlidiv thinks up some more piss taking excuses), if anyone can demonstrate our central points can be debunked it won't be you.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll -The-One-Above-All is Cryptohunter
Post by: xtraelv on November 08, 2019, 10:38:10 PM
The relevance of the Cryptohunter question is:

1) You were warned of a ban by Theymos for repeatedly breaking the forum rules.

2) It shows you have had  "net negative" effect on the forum for years.
Endless word walls that are negative, combative, deceptive and have little or no substance.

3) It shows you have run threads exactly like this for years and it is nothing "new or interesting" - it is the same information
over and over again. Where you use abuse, distortion, distraction and manipulation to alter what people actually say.

4) You are guilty of the same things you accuse other people of:

a) Pretending to be someone else
Account sales and having alts that are not disclosed are both frowned upon because people are pretending to be someone else.

b) Vouching for yourself
Using an alt to enhance your reputation is symilar as commenting on you own auction.

c) Censorship
Using local rules to distract from the actual issues that you use at the center of your complaint (Censorship and gaining an advantage by pretending to be someone else) so that you can attack and troll specific people that you hold a grudge against.

d) Using an alt in a "sting operation" in a misguided attempt to "entrap" those that you believe are guilty of scamming.

None of which I have tagged you for. Are you accusing me of being complicit in your scam too ?



Now don't be extra silly and go and say, well you have not answered the cryptohunter password question, because it is easy for the reader to look back and observe clearly you are refusing to answer our question THAT IS ON TOPIC and relevant since it relates to a DT member/ Dirty turd, and we are not going to indulge your off topic and irrelevant question (concerning a non DT member) until you have done so.


Lets look at the evidence.


You (cryptohunter) might've had some case for the trust system being broken if you had handled your initial trust issues with rationality and patience instead of absolutely losing your mind and throwing lies around, and even now I could imagine your red trust eventually being cleared if you were able to attain a stable mindset.


We see you doing this over and over again. There are 61 good reports against you in the last 60 days. You're going to get banned if you keep this up.


Wait a second, there were still people that thought this stupid cunt WASN'T CH...   No wonder so many people get scammed on this fucking site, people are fucking stupid...

In other breaking news water is wet, hookers will fuck you for money etc etc...


When I compared your writing of "suspected as same person":
https://i.imgur.com/Ya7YK7j.png

It means that it is is far more likely than not that it was written by the same person.

So:

Is Cryptohunter an account that you or "we" ever had or have the password for ? Yes / No

Failing to answer the question shows you are morally corrupt and intent to deceive.



Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 09, 2019, 01:38:13 AM
Haha,

I think you missed this part

Was tmans auction deception for direct financial gain SCAMMING  - YES OR NO??

Now don't be extra silly and go and say, well you have not answered the cryptohunter password question, because it is easy for the reader to look back and observe clearly you are refusing to answer our question THAT IS ON TOPIC and relevant since it relates to a DT member/ Dirty turd, and we are not going to indulge your off topic and irrelevant question (concerning a non DT member) until you have done so.

Now get on with answering our question before the scammers catch on to what we are really doing here.

Was tmans auction deception for direct financial gain SCAMMING  - YES OR NO??




We should not really indulge you since you are Undeniably a  SCAMMER SUPPORTER and refuse to answer a simple question.

Although you may deny it,  I have sought others opinions and they agree. There can be no doubt that you are "more likely than not " friendly and must be attempting to help us draw attention to the undeniable scamming actions of at least TMAN. Although I am sure you will help to drag the other scammers through the mill with us at great length too. I want to just thank you for that opportunity to bring another 1200 plus views and several extra pages thrashing out their undeniable scamming ways.

Thanks for providing more easy to debunk assumptions and the very poor " more likely than not"  lsm score.  I mean since we immediately came to meta, immediately continued where cryptohunter left off, and immediately addressed everyone with the same pet names he gave them, and stated we fully intending to match or as best we could replicate the style he had adopted. Since that is all pretty much public domain stuff then that score is very upsetting. Me must do better.

That kind of puts your other statements/fantasies firmly in the realm of speculation and wishful thinking.

Of course spouting undeniable madness regarding the true legend cryptohunters net negative "effect" on the forum in all those years is a brilliant master stroke. I mean knowing full well he is arguably the largest scam hunter ( in terms of effectiveness) in the entire forums history. Not just for forcing a $ 2 000 000 000 (20 000 000 back then) compensation airdrop offer to the entire board, but actually for making their project synonymous with instamine/scamming. Their community has accused him of preventing them knocking bitcoin from the top spot on coinmarketcap. That is reasonable since even though a huge proportion of the entire board was screaming it was a scam, the project was at number 2 spot for some time.  That is not even consider all the other HUGE projects that he met head on in battle and often alone against hoards of " investors/insiders" over the years and was first to break many huge scams to the main board.

That is not even considering that it was demonstrated he picked ...I think it was 6 of the top 12 largest rising projects in the last bull run way before the bull took place, giving freely his advice and making many millionaires from nothing.  

There is FAR more - pushing and helping the fair launch protocol for all members to have a fair chance to mine at the start of launch, being a community holder for a project when at one point he was holding huge dollar values of coins and no problems with him scamming. Pushing for a fair initial distribution for many many projects against greedy scum when he could have gained far more advantage himself by accepting their methods. Defending against bullying of other members.


You on the other hand are supporting and protecting SCAMMERS in fact some of the very scammers that the real legend cryptohunter has fought before, scammers that lied and scammed and tried to prevent the $ 2 000 000 000 usd air drop compensation offer to the entire board. Who then went accuse cryptohunter of being a liar years later, when he asked for evidence they just repeated the false claim. When cryptohunter told these undeniable scammers that he would point others to their history they trust abused his account haha and theymos sits there and does nothing, but more or less tells cryptohunter to shut up moaning he is boring...hahaha


You can't expect anyone who knows the past to take you as a noob fool, thinking playing whack a mole with the odd 2 bit scammers, whilst protect and supporting HUGE past time scammers and undeniable auction scammers is to be taken seriously and is net positive. You are our useful idiot that is your only net positive in any meaningful way.

Now as to your other false accusations...

Theymos warned CH of a ban based on the gamed and weaponized metric of deleted posts. Since we have clearly demonstrated moderators have incentive and clearly do delete posts that are on topic and relevant at the whim of their DT scamming pals who control their sigs then that metric is bogus.  To make it even more LAUGHABLE ...some useful idiot about 10 mins or so after theymos said that reported every single one of his 2 word posts from 6 years of history. So about 22 more deletes in a few mins. haha

Theymos was observably incorrect, cryptohunter did not get angry and start throwing lies around. We challenged theymos to present the lies on a different thread and the entire thread vanished.

The censorship issue is laughable,  but since you feel that those kinds of posts are acceptable and okay look forward to those on your threads.

Now thanks for allowing us to pull you apart and humiliate you again in public whilst boasting about a real legend. Come on scammer supporter, dyslexia can only answer for so much of your retardation.  As if you noob trash bumbling scam supporting dreg, have any business even mentioning cryptohunter.

You are an UNDENIABLE scammer supporter. Those scammers are guilty of multiple counts of financially high risk behaviors, and arguable some of the most financially dangerous members here.

Why are you so TERRIFIED of answering the question we keep asking you.??  It makes you looks super foolish and also super financially high risk to the rest of the board that even TMAN does not deny he was scamming there but you claim it is not scamming but " ONLY COMMENTS"

Don't go full retard, you will be of no use to us at all.

I think you missed this part

Was tmans auction deception for direct financial gain SCAMMING  - YES OR NO??

Now don't be extra silly and go and say, well you have not answered the cryptohunter password question, because it is easy for the reader to look back and observe clearly you are refusing to answer our question THAT IS ON TOPIC and relevant since it relates to a DT member/ Dirty turd, and we are not going to indulge your off topic and irrelevant question (concerning a non DT member) until you have done so.

Now get on with answering our question before the scammers catch on to what we are really doing here.

Was tmans auction deception for direct financial gain SCAMMING  - YES OR NO??


BTW don't reply too quickly,  start waiting till this goes near the bottom of page or at least half way down 1, this is not a sprint, this is a pressure over time tactic which will be far more effective to keep the spotlight on those scammers you are pretending to support. (We will keep deriding and humiliating you to keep them guessing. We will attack from both sides.) If it stays at the very top constantly that is going to start to annoy the other attention seekers as we have already noticed. However if you have more brilliant ideas to make us look good and the scammers look like scammers and you look like a fucktard then don't hold back because you may forget or get muddled up.

Can you confirm ( by asking your mother to confirm) that you are intending to be called xtraelv?  is your name trev? by any chance? or lex? hang on alex?? hmmm I thought this self debunking tactic was familiar..

Good bump on the irony thread, will add some more soon there to keep that current for you.




Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: nutildah on November 09, 2019, 02:02:00 AM
Haha,

I think you missed this part

When I compared your writing of "suspected as same person":
https://i.imgur.com/Ya7YK7j.png

It means that it is is far more likely than not that it was written by the same person.

So:

Is Cryptohunter an account that you or "we" ever had or have the password for ? Yes / No

Failing to answer the question shows you are morally corrupt and intent to deceive.

rekt.

Seems to me like he's trying to facilitate the scam of wasting our time.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 09, 2019, 02:15:41 AM
Haha,

I think you missed this part

When I compared your writing of "suspected as same person":
https://i.imgur.com/Ya7YK7j.png

It means that it is is far more likely than not that it was written by the same person.

So:

Is Cryptohunter an account that you or "we" ever had or have the password for ? Yes / No

Failing to answer the question shows you are morally corrupt and intent to deceive.

rekt.

Seems to me like he's trying to facilitate the scam of wasting our time.

Can someone help nutildah to the part where this was addressed and clearly demonstrated to be meaningless. I mean when someone intends to be seen clearly as cryptohunter and clearly says they intend to use his style then it would only come a surprise to you that that is what we do. Besides he probably means 0.29 or pasted the wrong emails. The entire thing is funny. I could claim I posted your recent posts and ones before the account sale and only got a 0.00 match hahaha, that bozo probably posted something of cryptohunters we quoted in one of our posts..lol next 1.0 match and calls that proof...haha who knows what he will pull on you guys next. Don't fall for it so easily nutildah, he is out to get you next I think haha. Wait until he starts making his excuses for you , then you will feel tmans pain..hahah... He likely has set that irony thread up just for you guys after realizing it is perfect to slap the ironic undeniable scammers come scamhunters on.

Besides even if true ( which it is not) wasting the time of a dangerous undeniable scammers or self confessed willing scam facilitator for pay WHOM tries to cover their tracks when caught, can certainly be viewed as helping the honest members of the community by distracting your evil attention in our direction. I would say that could certainly be considered net positive.

What if you had free time to give out trading tips ANTI MIDAS... imagine the damage to honest investors you could do??  NEM STAKE HOLDER To begging for 0.02 btc loans and having to move to a turd world shit hole to survive on his scampaign sig spamming  WHICH HE WAS NEVER INTERESTED IN... well that's what the original sales pitch claimed...haha

http://web.archive.org/web/20190704162438/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1622642.0

Come on xtraevl nuttildah is getting impatient, he wants his turn in the xtraelv meat grinder .............let's just get TMAN confirmed by you ( i mean it is undeniable anyway) but in your own words that Tman was scamming in his that auction we have been discussing. Then on to our  EVIL friend here nutildah.

I mean imagine being here years and years, and still having to beg for 0.02btc loans nutildah.... that really is sad (for you anyway). Imagine is you really were a NEM stake holder hahaha you must be crying being given 6 MILLION dollars or nearly 300 BTC and now begging for 0.02btc loans in public...the shame is too much. I can't even talk about it , I almost imagined that happening to me and I felt ...... well like you would when you wake up next to tmans wife in the morning having dreamed you pulled, well something female anyway,..... anyway you know exactly what I am talking about in both cases..hahahah


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - The-Ass-Above-All got rekt
Post by: xtraelv on November 09, 2019, 04:12:01 AM
Haha,

I think you missed this part

When I compared your writing of "suspected as same person":
https://i.imgur.com/Ya7YK7j.png

It means that it is is far more likely than not that it was written by the same person.

So:

Is Cryptohunter an account that you or "we" ever had or have the password for ? Yes / No

Failing to answer the question shows you are morally corrupt and intent to deceive.

rekt.

Seems to me like he's trying to facilitate the scam of wasting our time.



Can you confirm ( by asking your mother to confirm) that you are intending to be called xtraelv?  is your name trev? by any chance? or lex? hang on alex?? hmmm I thought this self debunking tactic was familiar..



Good try. Not even warm. Is this a pathetic attempt to DOX cause you got rekt ?

xtraelv is a gamer moniker - I think some of my rankings are still available.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - The-Ass-Above-All got rekt
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 10, 2019, 03:43:08 PM
Haha,

I think you missed this part

When I compared your writing of "suspected as same person":
https://i.imgur.com/Ya7YK7j.png

It means that it is is far more likely than not that it was written by the same person.

So:

Is Cryptohunter an account that you or "we" ever had or have the password for ? Yes / No

Failing to answer the question shows you are morally corrupt and intent to deceive.

rekt.

Seems to me like he's trying to facilitate the scam of wasting our time.



Can you confirm ( by asking your mother to confirm) that you are intending to be called xtraelv?  is your name trev? by any chance? or lex? hang on alex?? hmmm I thought this self debunking tactic was familiar..



Good try. Not even warm. Is this a pathetic attempt to DOX cause you got rekt ?

xtraelv is a gamer moniker - I think some of my rankings are still available.

Yep, asking if someone jumbled their username letters and clearly demonstrating they don't know what your name is a failed attempt to doxxx them haha
Then xldiv says: when you have forced me to clearly demonstrate that I xtraelv :

1. am undeniably a supporter of undeniable scammers
2. I reward undeniable scammers
3. I will present hilarious excuses to protect my undeniable scamming pals and place at high financial risk the rest of the forum
4. I am therefore undeniably financially high risk myself.
5. I will seek to derial, divert and side track to off topic garbage to attempt to discredit observable instance that can not be discredited
6. I will make ludicrous statements regarding other members that are perhaps among the observably most net positive in terms of fighting scams, giving tips that made more millionaires, and fighting for transparent rules/standards that ensure the fair treatment of all members, who have zero instances of financially motivated wrong doing in their entire history.

7.will claim that my speculations on non financially high risk issues are facts but then claim others undeniable observable instances demonstrating undeniable scamming are ......well I will just make excuses and in public refuse to answer yes or no. Looking extremely shady in light of the scammers themselves do not even deny it.

8. Will claim that identifying something you have already said you clearly intend to do is clear evidence you really did intend to do it.

then this means you are REKT.


This may seem by the scammers themselves as if you are trying to assist us in punishing them via dragging them and causing us to examine their undeniable scamming actions over and over. The hilarious excuses and crazy accusations are an attempt to demonstrate the scamming is impossible to defend and even attempting to do so is humiliating to the excuse provider and insulting to the reader.

We suspected the same. However it may be that we need to examine dsylexia and see how that could throw some light on the matter.

We decided to try and understand you and though thought process a little more.

https://www.understood.org/en/learning-thinking-differences/child-learning-disabilities/dyslexia/skills-that-can-be-affected-by-dyslexia

Dyslexia doesn’t only affect reading. It can make a lot of things hard for kids and adults. Here are some of the other skills and behaviors dyslexia can affect—some of which may surprise you.

Understand and follow directions

Repeat something in the right order

Remember words, phrases, names, and directions

Find the right word to say

Pronounce words the right way

Tell the difference between words that sound similar

Learn and use new words

Spell and use grammar the right way

Rhyme

Stay on topic

Understand jokes, puns, and sarcasm

Speak or read out loud with confidence

“Sound out” and pronounce words while reading

Get and stay interested in stories and books

Understand what’s read

Understand word problems in math

Write letters, numbers, and symbols in the right order

Express ideas in an organized way

Listen and take notes

Interpret body language and other social cues

Make and keep friends

Express feelings appropriately

Tell left from right

Build self-esteem

I mean these ( the red ones) certainly could be having a serious effect on your ability to hold a sensible and credible debate.

This is not something that we should really be capitalizing on even if it is punishing the scammers you are seeking  to defend and reward or perhaps you are not intending on doing that at all( i mean you may  not be deliberately high risk you may just be very befuddled and being used unfairly as a useful idiot by both sides)

You need to think it all over again, and perhaps even ask someone else to go through it all with you to make sure you are presenting yourself as you really wish to be seen.

No need to rush. We are not going to abandon you at this stage, don't worry.

You need to seriously consider this is all being documented and will remain here in history perhaps for quite a while.  

It is never too late to repent and do the right thing.  If you quit defending scammers at this point I see no further need for us to be working against each other. I do see you have put some work into finding other REAL scammers. I do not say you are entirely rotten like some members here. HOWEVER you can not support UNDENIABLE SCAMMERS.  Please do not reply and DO NOT RUSH into keeping this going unless you really believe that defending undeniable scammers is the correct thing to do.

We are ready to be civil and fair (well we have always been fair) with you BUT you need to be sensible and accept that this is auction scamming and that anyone else would have red and not be on DT, especially when you couple this will ALL the other evidence of supporting other undeniable scammers and trust abuse.

Get on the correct side of this because this is all public and on record. You can not present any credible case to explain his deliberate deception for clear and direct financial gain in any other terms other than scamming. That is exactly what scamming is.

Let's just agree it observably meets the universally accepted definition of scamming and is clear scamming for financial gain. Even alone this is NOT the acceptable behavior of a default trust member.





Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - The-Ass-Above-All got rekt
Post by: xtraelv on November 11, 2019, 07:19:35 AM

We suspected the same. However it may be that we need to examine dsylexia and see how that could throw some light on the matter.

https://i.imgur.com/eEaujom.png


Perhaps a good one for the irony thread.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - The-Ass-Above-All got rekt
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 11, 2019, 03:26:03 PM

We suspected the same. However it may be that we need to examine dsylexia and see how that could throw some light on the matter.

https://i.imgur.com/eEaujom.png


Perhaps a good one for the irony thread.

Shit ..REKT yet again... this is too easy for you guys to prove undeniable instances of scamming are simply to be ignored or even perhaps rewarded if they are your pals?

I think if you also included all of the other 20 spelling/grammatical errors in that post and most other huge posts we make, and coupled with the fact we copied and pasted the correct spelling right underneath it would add to the super irony of it all. Or you could refer to the explanation given already here on this thread that we thrash them out and don't correct the highlighted errors because it would be very time consuming and besides the effort reward ratio would be very low.]

There really was no need to take a little pic, we were not going to do a nutildah on it ffs. lol

Anyway, just to get back on to slightly more important issues. Are you going to investigate the initial post and the observable instances of undeniable scamming and do as you would with any other member, give red trust and exclude them from DT?

Let's be sensible, you know these observable behaviors step WAY OVER the threshold of what most people would consider financially high risk and scamming.

Let's forget the bitchy hair pulling and tit for tat comments. Let's just be sensible and agree that deliberate deception for direct financial gain is scamming , requires red trust and exclusion from DT.

Would you not agree that deliberately defending undeniable scamming even where the scammer does not deny his scamming could certainly be seen as financially high risk behavior? 

Get on the right side of this, why put all this effort hunting minor scammers who will likely just pop up again when you can be clearly observed here to be defending scammers in positions of TRUST (due in part to your enabling them) that can leverage that to do a lot more damage.

Be sensible and start acting like a person that members can trust to be doing all they can to stop financially high risk people endangering the rest of the honest members here.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - The-Ass-Above-All got rekt
Post by: xtraelv on November 12, 2019, 05:02:10 AM

Let's be sensible, you know these observable behaviors step WAY OVER the threshold of what most people would consider financially high risk and scamming.

Let's forget the bitchy hair pulling and tit for tat comments. Let's just be sensible and agree that deliberate deception for direct financial gain is scamming , requires red trust and exclusion from DT.

Would you not agree that deliberately defending undeniable scamming even where the scammer does not deny his scamming could certainly be seen as financially high risk behavior?  

Get on the right side of this, why put all this effort hunting minor scammers who will likely just pop up again when you can be clearly observed here to be defending scammers in positions of TRUST (due in part to your enabling them) that can leverage that to do a lot more damage.

Be sensible and start acting like a person that members can trust to be doing all they can to stop financially high risk people endangering the rest of the honest members here.


Lets be sensible here and observe that you have been lecturing and trolling to no effect on here.

Each DT has their own criteria.  People did not ask to be on DT.  I will not tag everyone that you demand I should tag. End of story.

<snip>

My friends from school can't believe i'm an internet celebrity at such a young age..

when do i get my own coin?



As far as celebrity = global retard, yes, you are.

<snip>


Perhaps let those soft baby hairs on your face grow a little bit longer before telling the adults what to do.

Better still go and play some minecraft. Drop the angry young man attitude and contribute positively to the forum rather than long vile abuse laden threads.

https://raisingchildren.net.au/pre-teens/development/understanding-your-pre-teen/brain-development-teens


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - The-Ass-Above-All got rekt
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 12, 2019, 07:26:40 PM

Let's be sensible, you know these observable behaviors step WAY OVER the threshold of what most people would consider financially high risk and scamming.

Let's forget the bitchy hair pulling and tit for tat comments. Let's just be sensible and agree that deliberate deception for direct financial gain is scamming , requires red trust and exclusion from DT.

Would you not agree that deliberately defending undeniable scamming even where the scammer does not deny his scamming could certainly be seen as financially high risk behavior?  

Get on the right side of this, why put all this effort hunting minor scammers who will likely just pop up again when you can be clearly observed here to be defending scammers in positions of TRUST (due in part to your enabling them) that can leverage that to do a lot more damage.

Be sensible and start acting like a person that members can trust to be doing all they can to stop financially high risk people endangering the rest of the honest members here.


Lets be sensible here and observe that you have been lecturing and trolling to no effect on here.

Each DT has their own criteria.  People did not ask to be on DT.  I will not tag everyone that you demand I should tag. End of story.

<snip>

My friends from school can't believe i'm an internet celebrity at such a young age..

when do i get my own coin?



As far as celebrity = global retard, yes, you are.

<snip>


Perhaps let those soft baby hairs on your face grow a little bit longer before telling the adults what to do.

Better still go and play some minecraft. Drop the angry young man attitude and contribute positively to the forum rather than long vile abuse laden threads.

https://raisingchildren.net.au/pre-teens/development/understanding-your-pre-teen/brain-development-teens


Which part of

You are deliberately defending and attempting to excuse an UNDENIABLE scammer (which you will not even deny because it is impossible), You are supporting and EVEN CLAIMING he is one of the most trust worthy members on this forum.

Which part of that do you not understand is

Undeniably financially high risk behavior??

Even more amusing you are QUOTING THE WORDS OF ANOTHER SCAM SUPPORTER who was crying because A REAL SCAM HUNTER forced their dev to acknowledge their scamming and offer the entire board a share of a  2 000 000 000 USD compensation offer.

Haha so supporting scammers and scammer supporters is becoming a bit of a theme for you I see?

Thanks for not running away and rather launching into MORE ad hominem speculation of the age of a member you on top of the speculation that you believe we are the same member.

Thanks for undeniably confirming in the post that you are a scammer supporter and excuser. Given the observable evidence you have willingly provided there is no way to refute/deny this.

Keep dredging back to 2014 in the history of REAL LEGENDS with REAL ACHIEVEMENTS and you may find what suchmoon and all the other goons has missed. That evidence of some financial wrong doing ( that does not exist)

Imagine if you dug into the past histories of those scammers you are supporting....spend your time more wisely fool.

When people succeed at things in their teen years that others can not achieve in their lives ..... they are not going to look up to them especially when those demanding respect are undeniable scammer supporters .

You have no credible or reasonable explanation to rewarding and excusing undeniable scammers. If these " own standards" you have allow that then you should have red trust and not be on DT.  Undeniable.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: JaredKaragen on November 13, 2019, 02:57:29 AM
I can't believe TOAA is still trying to maintain some sort of defense.....   All I have to do is read your replies to his... not even his (which are blocked) and it paints a CLEAR picture.


TOAA:  GFY.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 15, 2019, 12:55:00 AM
I can't believe TOAA is still trying to maintain some sort of defense.....   All I have to do is read your replies to his... not even his (which are blocked) and it paints a CLEAR picture.


TOAA:  GFY.

More words with zero substance behind them. Mr ar15 tough guy haha

I think it's more of a sustained and continuous attack on undeniable scammers and their supporters. One of which is your very low functioning self.  

The only thing clear here is that you are too much of a pussy to come and debate with us, so have to pretend we are on ignore.

Come. why don't you take your turn at  being humiliated in public whilst trying to debate with us the observable instances listed in the initial post?  Perhaps you will provide more entertainment by explaining how deliberate deception for direct financial gain is not scamming and should not be punished but rather rewarded with default trust positions?

Oh wait you won't. You can see (just from reading the replies) the most silly excuses have been presented and ripped to pieces.

Come here jared and let's get down to specifics. You scammer supporting dreg.

Ready to entertain us further Jesterkaragon?? yes or no.??



Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TMAN on November 15, 2019, 02:28:10 AM
Just popped in to say I heard the word observable in a movie just now and it triggers me so hard. Even though TAS is on ignore I’d wager the fuckwitt wanker has used the word observable at least once in the trolling shitpost above.

Also.. 2nd in the poll... come on fucko you can spin up more alts than that surely


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: TheNewAnon135246 on November 15, 2019, 04:36:48 AM
Observable instances

@TMAN, I'm going to spare you the rest of his incoherent nonsense but you were right.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 19, 2019, 05:15:29 PM
Observable instances

@TMAN, I'm going to spare you the rest of his incoherent nonsense but you were right.

Lot of fortune jack alts and pals all joined around the same time didn't they.

Things that may seem incoherent to idiots and non achieving scammer supporters or worse like yourselves are perfectly comprehensible to those that are way smarter. Just so you know. Although even that concept may be out of your league.

What a filthy gambling sig spamming scammer supporting fucking loser we have here.  Can you imagine being so low and worthless on the scammer league table you are a public tman ass feltcher and scammer defender... hahaha


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: actmyname on November 19, 2019, 05:38:25 PM
I am going to cut out all the ad-hominem attacks so you can see the substance of the post.


Even if others use ad-hominem against you, it detracts from your post substantially when you decide to enter the same path of argumentative logic.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 19, 2019, 06:25:15 PM
I am going to cut out all the ad-hominem attacks so you can see the substance of the post.


Even if others use ad-hominem against you, it detracts from your post substantially when you decide to enter the same path of argumentative logic.

Well, taking the full context of this thread, I think that there is far greater value to that post to the discerning reader. That may have not read ALL pages thus far. Many of what you may consider ad hominem attacks are not meeting the definition of ad hominem at all in our opinion in the context of this thread. (of course you could present an arguement we would openly consider and evaluate)

When one has clearly and undeniably been demonstrated to support scammers then calling them out as scammer supporters in a thread focusing on scammers and scammer supporters that are infesting DT then there is certainly value. The reader can always ask for clarification and validation.

However, ignoring that for the time being.

Are you seriously going to continue to selectively apply your counsel in our direction whilst saying nothing at all to the myriad of others that engage in far more clear cut adhominem attacks (that are also going to fall apart under even mild scrutiny not highly credible statements such as our own) that occur instantly on our threads that seek to derail and destroy any real chance of a debate on the central and core points being raised?

I would only ask that you appear early on in our threads and give the same counsel to ANY member that starts with ad hominem attacks or going off topic and relevant at all.

If you refuse to do so then we ask respectfully that you refrain from selectively injecting your criticism in our specific direction.

In the notes we have it says to treat you with respect and it goes on to say that your posts should be carefully appraised before tackling your central points fairly and clearly with no form of undo aggression and certainly no ad hominem attacks regardless of whom or what you are giving support to at that current moment.

I mean if you are to objectively remove all valueless content and that of negative value then meta would likely be a very sparse place.

I think you will find that if you are really taking ad hominem then we are far less guilty than most ( that do not receive your counsel)

A discerning reader will almost always cut away ad hominem anyway , however unless they are privy to the truth and history in all cases it is impossible to cut away trolling and scammer supporting.




Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: actmyname on November 19, 2019, 08:50:47 PM
Are you seriously going to continue to selectively apply your counsel
On a technical basis, I am being selective. If I had both the free time and the desire to go through all posts and extract only the non-ad-hominem fragments of the replies, then I would do so. The latter is the bigger factor in this.

[other ad-hominem attacks] that occur instantly on our threads that seek to derail and destroy any real chance of a debate on the central and core points being raised?
Refer to my post's comment about "two wrongs don't make a right".

I would only ask that you appear early on in our threads and give the same counsel to ANY member that starts with ad hominem attacks or going off topic and relevant at all. If you refuse to do so then we ask respectfully that you refrain from selectively injecting your criticism in our specific direction.
Selective truths are still truths. Whether I nitpicked the ad-hominem attacks of JUST you or everyone else doesn't take away from the fact that the post was an egregious display of ad-hominem argumentation.

I mean if you are to objectively remove all valueless content and that of negative value then meta would likely be a very sparse place.
True of all boards.

I think you will find that if you are really taking ad hominem then we are far less guilty than most ( that do not receive your counsel)
"Not as bad as" fallacy.

A discerning reader will almost always cut away ad hominem anyway
True. Doesn't mean it's warranted regardless.
Any questions?


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 20, 2019, 12:29:40 AM
Are you seriously going to continue to selectively apply your counsel
On a technical basis, I am being selective. If I had both the free time and the desire to go through all posts and extract only the non-ad-hominem fragments of the replies, then I would do so. The latter is the bigger factor in this.

[other ad-hominem attacks] that occur instantly on our threads that seek to derail and destroy any real chance of a debate on the central and core points being raised?
Refer to my post's comment about "two wrongs don't make a right".

I would only ask that you appear early on in our threads and give the same counsel to ANY member that starts with ad hominem attacks or going off topic and relevant at all. If you refuse to do so then we ask respectfully that you refrain from selectively injecting your criticism in our specific direction.
Selective truths are still truths. Whether I nitpicked the ad-hominem attacks of JUST you or everyone else doesn't take away from the fact that the post was an egregious display of ad-hominem argumentation.

I mean if you are to objectively remove all valueless content and that of negative value then meta would likely be a very sparse place.
True of all boards.

I think you will find that if you are really taking ad hominem then we are far less guilty than most ( that do not receive your counsel)
"Not as bad as" fallacy.

A discerning reader will almost always cut away ad hominem anyway
True. Doesn't mean it's warranted regardless.
Any questions?

Well, we are not expecting you to go through all of the posts on the forum, but perhaps a sensible analysis of just the posts on the thread that you are choosing to comment on would be optimal.  It seems unlikely that a time constraint would consistently lead to your sole selection of our posts only that need to be criticized especially where there are higher frequency and higher density of other users on those thread using ONLY ad hominem attacks that are not even mixed among/based upon valid and irrefutable points.  It is not impossible that a time constraint could result in such selective or randomly allocated criticism ending on our doorstep alone, but each time that it does pass over everyone else and does land on our door step alone it becomes increasingly improbable that could be the sole explanation.

Also I don't believe that our comment meets the threshold for not as bad fallacy in this instance. As I explained that particular post and many of the terms and statements made are not strictly ad hominem when you take the full context of the thread including the points raised in the initial post and other subsequent revelations. Therefore there are certainly posts contained within this thread and the other thread that your point would have been clearly more relevant and clearly stronger in terms of no opposition could have been forthcoming that would stand up to scrutiny. That is keeping in mind that our understanding is that ad hominem are personal attacks (even if factually based) that have no direct influence on the central points being made or that the central points being made are certainly not dependent on those personal attacks/statements of fact. I'm not even sure that one can say that calling a skunk a skunk is an attack anyway, no more than calling an undeniable scammer and undeniable scammer, especially when discussing skunks being present in places they have no business being and scammers being in places they have no business being.

That's not to say your points are disputed in full, but only that your points seems to lack the accuracy and indisputable relevance and strength they may have had if directed as any of other numerous members on this thread relying on PURE and undeniable clear ad hominem. Therefore the impact can be seen to be reduced or even nulled in full.

So that is what we meant by not as bad, perhaps not as applicable, not as relevant, not as clear cut, not as indefensible  etc.

We appreciate ad hominem is ad hominem, we simply dispute that post is clear cut as adhominem in the full context. Certainly you would have less problem presenting your point as clearly and undeniably valid with many other posts here by other members. Or even just for a change to mix things up a bit with a view to being neutral and all of that kind of thing.

I have no idea why you do not just join with the debate. I suspect it is because you have enough sense to realize they are trying to defend pretty much indefensible positions that they have put themselves in due to the observable instances in their post histories. Or again it could be a time constraint or lack of interest. Those are certainly possibilities.

As we say we have no direct issue with you actmyname, and are always willing to be cordial and fair. We ask the same.







Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: actmyname on November 20, 2019, 03:02:19 AM
Well, we are not expecting you to go through all of the posts on the forum, but perhaps a sensible analysis of just the posts on the thread that you are choosing to comment on would be optimal.  It seems unlikely that a time constraint would consistently lead to your sole selection of our posts only that need to be criticized especially where there are higher frequency and higher density of other users on those thread using ONLY ad hominem attacks that are not even mixed among/based upon valid and irrefutable points.  It is not impossible that a time constraint could result in such selective or randomly allocated criticism ending on our doorstep alone, but each time that it does pass over everyone else and does land on our door step alone it becomes increasingly improbable that could be the sole explanation.
This paragraph was constructed due to a miscommunication.

If I had both the free time and the desire to go through all posts and extract only the non-ad-hominem fragments of the replies, then I would do so. The latter is the bigger factor in this.

Also I don't believe that our comment meets the threshold for not as bad fallacy in this instance.
Unless you want to twist meaningless semantics, there are no partial fallacies. The idea of a threshold should be no different than "is" or "isn't" - a binary state.

statements are not strictly ad hominem when you take the full context of the thread
Depending on how you define 'ad hominem' you could falsify this point by attacking a premise. Nevertheless, I shall state: you should not see a non-quoted statement that is a character attack, to then subsequently change your opinion and decide that it is in fact not a character attack, once you uncover preceding events.

How would context make the following remarks not ad-hominem?

  • chode
  • mutated tourettes
  • filthy dirty skanky scammers
  • degenerate asskissing servile scummy scam supporters
  • disgusting shit stain ass kissing scammer supporters
  • scum bags
  • observably low functioning plebs
  • Turd world desperate scum bags
  • Morons
  • idiots
  • filthy gambling sig spamming scammer supporting fucking loser
  • public tman ass feltcher
  • shit pumpers
  • turd word scanks
  • dregs
  • Tourettes poet
  • terrified little scamming bitch
  • imbecile and useful idiot
  • all that you splurge out here as if it is moronic spew
  • lauda ass feltchers
  • dirty little scumbag club
  • Shut up scum bag
  • dirt bags
  • the rest of their useful idiots could still make it out
  • smarmacist a sneaky snake like fool
  • Get on with it scabby little exit scamming exchange pusher
  • you and your scamming pals
  • Got to love the defense here by these scumbags
  • agent foxpoop
  • agent foxpoop
  • foxpooping
  • foxpoop
  • agent foxpoop
  • foxpoop
  • foxpoop
  • foxpoop
  • agent foxpoop
  • agent foxpoop
  • foxpoop
  • agent foxpoop
  • agent foxpoop
  • agent foxpoop
  • agent foxpoop
  • foxpoop
  • foxpoop
  • foxpoop
  • Foxpoop
  • foxpooping
  • agent foxpoop
  • foxpooping
  • agent foxpoop
  • foxpooper
  • foxpoop
  • FOXPOOP
  • foxpoop
  • foxpoops
  • agent foxpoop
  • direwolf supports tmans tourettes syndrome [...] Direposting assfeltching burger flipping dreg that he is.

And then once you answer that...

Refer to my post's comment about "two wrongs don't make a right".


I'm not even sure that one can say that calling a skunk a skunk is an attack anyway, no more than calling an undeniable scammer and undeniable scammer
Refer to the above for examples of non-scammer insults and attacks.

especially when discussing skunks being present in places they have no business being and scammers being in places they have no business being.
snide

only that your points seems to lack the accuracy and indisputable relevance and strength [...] [t]herefore the impact can be seen to be reduced or even nulled in full.
A single point, an individual conclusion... it is either true or false.

So that is what we meant by not as bad, perhaps not as applicable, not as relevant, not as clear cut, not as indefensible  etc.
These are justifications, are they not? If they were not justifications, it would be not as bad. An objective statement as opposed to a subjective statement. This is simply downplaying severity, which is on a binary scale.

We appreciate ad hominem is ad hominem, we simply dispute that post is clear cut as adhominem in the full context.
Addressed above.

Certainly you would have less problem presenting your point as clearly and undeniably valid with many other posts here by other members.
That is true but this has already been addressed in the first post.

Or even just for a change to mix things up a bit with a view to being neutral and all of that kind of thing.
Neutrality does not necessarily mean addressing both sides equally.

I have no idea why you do not just join with the debate.
I have better things to do.

Or again it could be a time constraint or lack of interest. Those are certainly possibilities.
Yes.

As we say we have no direct issue with you actmyname, and are always willing to be cordial and fair. We ask the same.
I have always been fair. Blunt and fair.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: suchmoon on November 20, 2019, 03:12:07 AM
  • chode
  • mutated tourettes

I don't know what this is and I can't be bothered to read the walls of text to find out but it looks like a list of cryptohunter's best friends so I'm deeply offended that "fat slob" is not in the list. Did I eat all those cookies for nothing? Will sue for discrimination and damage of my fragile ego.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 20, 2019, 03:30:38 AM
saving this spot to reply directly to actmyname... we are scooting out for a bit this evening but don't wish reams of scammer supporter drivel injected between our two posts.

We immediately notice a couple of small points...

chode is not our word or one we were familiar with, we copied that from nutildahs fun poll about CH on his account sales thread. I think that context need be examined again by actmyname. That I recall was clearly a shout out to his poll and a clear reference to his use of it ...

The goal posts seem to have been moved from us claiming the single post in question (to which we referring)  was not clearly ad hominem to apparently claiming we have indulged in a little cathartic ad hominem retaliation here and there in the past.

There seems to be a multiple query next to the same foxpoop terms. Is there need for more than one example? Not that we mind of course but it was just an unexpected elongation of a list that could have been filled with more variation perhaps.

When debating with actmyname then clear examples and analogies can be useful since it is not always clear to us what point he is making. It does become clear when examples are used.

However, these kind of interactions are always interesting and we like to work with others to arrive at the optimal solution or outcome.

This part is also confusing...

"Refer to the above for examples of non-scammer insults and attacks."

since then the explanation is given, would it not be best to remove those that are  scammer/scammer supporting  related from that list in this instance?  Once those are removed and the foxpoopers are consolidated, then the list will be significantly shorter ... and none if any at all would remain that are directly relevant to our defense of the post singled out for an actmyname selective counselling of the use of ad hominem.
Although we would be willing to present context where those others would by our " current" opinion not be ad hominem attacks.

These kinds of debates are useful even if not strictly on topic so better to go with those and enjoy them rather than constantly debunking the excuses and deliberate attempts at derailing and diverting of the same old scammer supporters over and over.

Later we can get back to the analysis of the observable instances in the initial post and as to whether people such as those should be in positions of TRUST.

I mean the thread has been so derailed and diverted and corrupted by  (as actymyname clearly seems to acknowledge) undeniable and indefensible accounts of sustained ad hominem attacks of other members we can take a break from that now to debate on something a little more sensible,more cordial/measured and reasonable way.

We ask actmyname looks over his post and then decide if any edits are required. If they decide not, then fair enough we shall seek to answer as is.


Although two wrongs do not make a right as you say actmyname, i think it is sensible to counsel as frequently and fairly as you possibly can both sides. I mean fair is subjective but I think it would be universally accepted that to counsel/chastise  one child constantly when both ( in your opinion) are doing wrong would indicate some form of bias even if not a conscious act.































 


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: DireWolfM14 on November 20, 2019, 03:35:31 AM
I don't know what this is and I can't be bothered to read the walls of text to find out but it looks like a list of cryptohunter's best friends so I'm deeply offended that "fat slob" is not in the list. Did I eat all those cookies for nothing? Will sue for discrimination and damage of my fragile ego.

I made the list and you didn't?  There's something inherently wrong with that.

Actmyname did a remarkable job scouring for foxpoop, but he also missed moronbozo (my personal favorite,) so don't take it personally.  It is monumental task he so brazenly volunteered to undertake.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: suchmoon on November 20, 2019, 03:59:43 AM
Actmyname did a remarkable job scouring for foxpoop

Foxpup is getting a nice ROI with these avatar ads. All this subliminal stimulation is working beautifully on cryptohunter. Sadly for me, even having CHIP in my signature doesn't help. I mean come on, chocolate chip cookies etc - the puns write themselves.


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: Foxpup on November 20, 2019, 04:48:20 AM
How would context make the following remarks not ad-hominem?
As far as I can tell, he started out by suggesting that a legitimate conflict of interest arises whenever DT members and merit sources have sexual relations with each other*, but he seems to gotten carried away. In particular, I don't know what he has against scum bags - they serve a vital function in waste management (if anything, this forum has too much scum and not enough bags).

*Either that or he's just jealous that we're getting more action than he is. :D

Foxpup is getting a nice ROI with these avatar ads. All this subliminal stimulation is working beautifully on cryptohunter.
Not quite as beautifully as I would like. He seems to be focusing way too much on the wrong fox hole. :-\


Title: Re: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????
Post by: The-One-Above-All on November 26, 2019, 02:29:32 PM
So back on topic ... to TMANs auction scamming defense. Where is xtraelv .... ran away again??

Since actmyname has not edited his post then we are happy to leave this as it is. The important points there we seem in agreement with

Quote from: The-One-Above-All on November 20, 2019, 12:29:40 AM
Certainly you would have less problem presenting your point as clearly and undeniably valid with many other posts here by other members.
That is true but this has already been addressed in the first post.

That seems to be the crux of the matter along with the observation that this needs to be addressed so that to appear neutral and not supporting a group of scammers ( apart from including them on default trust) the counsel needs to be applied regularly to both sides when it is applicable to both sides.

So now that we have established that nobody here can or will dare offer and alternative explanation for tmans auction scamming (deception for financial gain) although many have tried to falsely claim it is not scamming and rather he should be on default trust. We can see therefore this is misleading and a clear case of scammer supporting and protecting.