Bitcoin Forum

Bitcoin => Bitcoin Discussion => Topic started by: TKeenan on November 09, 2014, 04:42:31 PM



Title: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: TKeenan on November 09, 2014, 04:42:31 PM
What?  This is bullshit!  Some kook comes in here, splashes information and claims about 27 girls being raped by a board member, then he says some dumb bitch in his family is depressed so he is going to stop the allegations.  That is HEAVILY slander per se.  This guy Bruce is a total fraud and derelict.  He should absolutely be ostracized forever from the bitcoin community.  If he comes around here yet again slinging his false shit about the place, he and his made up garbage should be stricken from record.  I call for action.  This has gone too far this time.

(ref: this thread - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=851373.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=851373.0))

If Patrick Murck isn't a pedo, this kook job Bruce Kucinskas should pay hell for being such a raging dick.  I thought it was all true yesterday.  The way I look at it now is someone is going down absolutely.  Either Murck is a pedo and needs to be removed from Earth - or Bruno Kucinskas is a raging fucking liar and slanderer of the highest order and needs to receive full and just punishment for levying outrageous false allegations against an upstanding Bitcoin citizen who works very hard at the highest level for the benefit of all of us.  

I demand action!!  You should too.  Don't stand idle and allow such bullshit to rip apart the community.  

I am now unlocking this thread.  

Yep. I didn't think this through, acting while pissed off now put my family, some located in other states, possibly in danger, but definitely now in various degrees of depression, one of which was already in a severe state but slowly recovering, but now thanks to my actions, and possibly somebody from Patrick's camp being responsibly, she's relapsed, thus it's prudent I cease communicating on this issue and am about to pass what I have to proper authorities.

I'm now locking this thread, along with the other recent threads that are TBF related.

~Bruno Kucinskas




Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: Lethn on November 09, 2014, 04:43:36 PM
Question everything, assume nothing.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: Gleb Gamow on November 09, 2014, 05:00:06 PM
What?  This is bullshit!  Some kook comes in here, splashes information and claims about 27 girls being raped by a board member, then he says some dumb bitch in his family is depressed so he is going to stop the allegations.  That is HEAVILY slander per se.  This guy Bruno is a total fraud and derelict.  He should absolutely be ostracized forever from the bitcoin community.  If he comes around here yet again slinging his false shit about the place, he and his made up garbage should be stricken from record.  I call for action.  This has gone too far this time.

If Patrick Murck isn't a pedo, this kook job Bruno Kucinskas should pay hell for being such a raging dick.  I thought it was all true yesterday.

I am now unlocking this thread.  

Yep. I didn't think this through, acting while pissed off now put my family, some located in other states, possibly in danger, but definitely now in various degrees of depression, one of which was already in a severe state but slowly recovering, but now thanks to my actions, and possibly somebody from Patrick's camp being responsibly, she's relapsed, thus it's prudent I cease communicating on this issue and am about to pass what I have to proper authorities.

I'm now locking this thread, along with the other recent threads that are TBF related.

~Bruno Kucinskas



For starters, I did the prudent thing by locking the threads because family members were threatened, but nary a one in my household as you claimed. Also, I find it very, very, very suspicious that you opted to incorporate my brother's name not once, but twice, of which I kindly request that you correct your post as I have when I quoted it above.

You can believe what you wish, but since this involves millions of dollars, these fuckers are playing a dangerous game, a game that's no longer funny.

If what I did was wrong and illegal, then I will be sued for my actions, of which will be welcomed.

That said, kindly lock this thread, and start a new one in the Scam Section, with me only requesting that you, among others, be careful what you pen, for I truly feel now that I'm a marked man thanks to looking out for you and your cryptocurrency position. BTW, your welcome in that last regard.

~Bruno Kucinskas

Welcome guys :)
Wow! bitcoin is cool.  Hello world.

PS: I was here over two years before you arrived, being instrumental in making Bitcoin cool. Ironic that the guy that helped, and continues to help make Bitcoin cool is the same guy you now opt to disgrace and mention my family members under attack due to my actions, alone, as you hide behind your moniker.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: TKeenan on November 09, 2014, 05:36:13 PM
For starters, I did the prudent thing by locking the threads
Censorship is never prudent - it is always corrupt.  Let people have their say.  Don't try to control what others think or say.

because family members were threatened, but nary a one in my household as you claimed.
I did not claim anything of the sort.

Also, I find it very, very, very suspicious that you opted to incorporate my brother's name not once, but twice, of which I kindly request that you correct your post as I have when I quoted it above.
Bruce, Bruno - birds of a feather.  You are all the same.  "very, very suspicious " - suspicious of what?  It was a type-o ya idiot.  When I wrote it, I didn't even know you had a brother.  


but since this involves millions of dollars, these fuckers are playing a dangerous game, a game that's no longer funny.
paranoia.  You started this war.  If it turns out you made that shit up about Murck - you need to be severely dealt with.  I say you have 24 hours to produce legitimate evidence - or that which they have planned for you and your family was well deserved.  I'll even send them money if someone posts a bitcoin address to support their counterattack on you and your family.  This isn't the first time you came around here yelling "Pedophile".  If it is not true, you are way overdue for being shut down.


If what I did was wrong and illegal, then I will be sued for my actions, of which will be welcomed.
If illegal?  Pretty fucking seriously illegal.  Sued - I doubt it.  I think they will come up with other ways to sort you out.  And when they do, you'll see me cheering on the sidelines.  Unless, your allegations are serious and true.  You should defend yourself properly this time and bring the evidence.  If you say "my family is under attack because they have millions - so I can't back up my allegations now", we will laugh you off the face of the planet.

Bring the evidence without further delay nor excuse - or it is completely clear that you are an outrageous fraud


That said, kindly lock this thread,
No chance at all.  Ever.  I don't believe in censorship.


I truly feel now that I'm a marked man
You feel this way because you should be marked.  I hope it is true and I hope they are successful in bringing to you that which you are certainly due.  I also hope that it hurts you.


thanks to looking out for you and your cryptocurrency position.
I doubt if you did anything to help any crypto position.


PS: I was here over two years before you arrived,
Well, then.  Nobody who arrived so late should be allowed any opinion.  Only yours is to be considered.  The value of opinion is directly proportional to the sign-up date.  Brilliant.  


being instrumental in making Bitcoin cool.
Yeah, you made it cool.  You are a raging lunatic who loves to sling outrageous shit around the place.  That is not cool.  Let's see the evidence - or you have forever lost your reputation and right to speak in these fora.






Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: Gleb Gamow on November 09, 2014, 07:16:24 PM
Suck my dick!

Quote
then he says some dumb bitch in his family is depressed

I'll admit to reading the above as somebody in my household, and not a distant family member.

Quote
Too bad soon you may no longer have a father.

Quote
How long has your brother been deranged?

Quote
Did you know that your uncle hates niggers?

Quote
Did your uncle used to play with your private parts when you were a kid?

Those, and a couple more, penned shortly after I started that Patrick Murck thread, hence locking it, ending my public displays, now using the advice given by a well-respected Bitcoiner as to how to properly proceed.

Now, I kindly ask you one last time, please lock this thread and start an appropriate one in the Scam Section of this forum outlining why I should be censured, otherwise I will have to bother the mods to have it done for you, something I have NEVER done in the past.

Again, I have done more good for Bitcoin, and will continue to do so, then you have.

~Bruno Kucinskas


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: LiteCoinGuy on November 09, 2014, 08:07:53 PM
What?  This is bullshit!  Some kook comes in here, splashes information and claims about 27 girls being raped by a board member, then he says some dumb bitch in his family is depressed so he is going to stop the allegations.  That is HEAVILY slander per se.  This guy Bruce is a total fraud and derelict.  He should absolutely be ostracized forever from the bitcoin community.  If he comes around here yet again slinging his false shit about the place, he and his made up garbage should be stricken from record.  I call for action.  This has gone too far this time.

(ref: this thread - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=851373.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=851373.0))

If Patrick Murck isn't a pedo, this kook job Bruce Kucinskas should pay hell for being such a raging dick.  I thought it was all true yesterday.  The way I look at it now is someone is going down absolutely.  Either Murck is a pedo and needs to be removed from Earth - or Bruno Kucinskas is a raging fucking liar and slanderer of the highest order and needs to receive full and just punishment for levying outrageous false allegations against an upstanding Bitcoin citizen who works very hard at the highest level for the benefit of all of us.  

I demand action!!  You should too.  Don't stand idle and allow such bullshit to rip apart the community.  

I am now unlocking this thread.  

Yep. I didn't think this through, acting while pissed off now put my family, some located in other states, possibly in danger, but definitely now in various degrees of depression, one of which was already in a severe state but slowly recovering, but now thanks to my actions, and possibly somebody from Patrick's camp being responsibly, she's relapsed, thus it's prudent I cease communicating on this issue and am about to pass what I have to proper authorities.

I'm now locking this thread, along with the other recent threads that are TBF related.

~Bruno Kucinskas





dude i thought the same! when somebody says that i rape children i would make a hellfire. Murck should take action against Bruno or he (Murck) is not credible anymore, sad but true. hopefully the allegations are false.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: J. J. Phillips on November 09, 2014, 08:43:15 PM
No one has presented any evidence about Murck.

I don't know any of the parties involved. I'm not very active on the forum, but from my lurking I remembered this:

In May 2014, Bruno (as Phinneaus Gage) started a thread "I just paid the $100K USD via BTC to become a Platinum Member of TBF." Later in the day on that thread he admitted that he hadn't done this and he had made the thread to make a point about KnC's possible non-payment to TBF.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=621770.msg6891010#msg6891010 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=621770.msg6891010#msg6891010)

I suspect the simplest explanation is that Bruno was upset by Murck's dismissal of Bruno's concerns in the recent Reddit AMA and he, for some reason, thought accusing Murck of being a pedophile would be a reasonable way to amplify his concerns. (It obviously wasn't.)

If this is what happened, I would hope that Bruno would apologize and then seek some psychological help.  My suggestion isn't intended to be mean. I'm not angry and I really don't want to get involved. But I honestly do think Bruno may need psychological help and, if so, I hope he asks for it (not on the forum, obviously). This isn't something a healthy person would do.

Finally, remember that no one has presented any evidence about Murck. I hope no one is believing this. He hasn't been credibly accused of anything.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: UsernameBitcoin on November 09, 2014, 08:53:15 PM
Hey Bruno,

could you please release the proof you have. Now. It's in the interest of Bitcoin, abused children, and your own credibility.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: freedomno1 on November 09, 2014, 08:59:41 PM
Question everything, assume nothing.

Indeed no information from either side
So at a standpoint of not sure if Gage is throwing false pedo stuff again or if its legit.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: balu2 on November 09, 2014, 09:30:32 PM
pitchforks: everybody has one 

do not forget to breath while posting



Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: BittBurger on November 09, 2014, 09:51:28 PM
Censorship is never prudent - it is always corrupt.  Let people have their say.  Don't try to control what others think or say.

LOL.  Comments like these are so cute and naive.  You've obviously never had to manage a large number of human beings before.  Painfully obvious.

Its so funny how people like yourself think that only people in power are corrupt.  Its not possible that the myriads of regular people can't also be just as insanely corrupt, and in need of boundaries.

I can only wish upon you the curse of having to manage a large community of people yourself.  So you get to deal with being subjected to the insanity, tinfoil hats, unfounded paranoias, suspicions, and outright lying that comes from the "sheeples".

-B-


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: TKeenan on November 10, 2014, 02:07:03 AM
Suck my dick!

Now, I kindly ask you one last time, please lock this thread and start an appropriate one in the Scam Section of this forum outlining why I should be censured, otherwise I will have to bother the mods to have it done for you, something I have NEVER done in the past.

Again, I have done more good for Bitcoin, and will continue to do so, then you have.

~Bruno Kucinskas
That is rich.  You intend to ask the moderator to delete my thread because you perceive it as unfair?  After you post a lie about an honest man regarding pedophilia?  You are a whack job of the very highest order.  You should be put in a very tight cage and never let out. 

Holy shit I can't believe you are allowed to do this shit.  Murck ought to kill you - not sue you.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: Gleb Gamow on November 10, 2014, 03:13:26 AM
Suck my dick!

Now, I kindly ask you one last time, please lock this thread and start an appropriate one in the Scam Section of this forum outlining why I should be censured, otherwise I will have to bother the mods to have it done for you, something I have NEVER done in the past.

Again, I have done more good for Bitcoin, and will continue to do so, then you have.

~Bruno Kucinskas
That is rich.  You intend to ask the moderator to delete my thread because you perceive it as unfair?  After you post a lie about an honest man regarding pedophilia?  You are a whack job of the very highest order.  You should be put in a very tight cage and never let out.  

Holy shit I can't believe you are allowed to do this shit.  Murck ought to kill you - not sue you.

He'll have to get on the list: http://s15.postimg.org/lo5naqwnv/zipkin_threat.png

Question: How long have you been sticking it up the asses of the very people that are trying to help you?

BTW, I stated lock and not delete.

And, not because your thread is unfair, for I have no problem there. I have no problem with my life being directly threatened, per se, but now there are family members involved, hence my course of action and asking you nicely to cease.

I've asked you kindly twice, but now you wish that Patrick kills me, something I've never resorted to espousing.

As far as this particular matter is concern, it is now between Patrick Murck and I, welcoming his lawsuit. There's now no need for you to be involved.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: BlindMayorBitcorn on November 10, 2014, 03:45:34 AM
A very verbal member of the community let one too many rants go wrong. I suggest we move on...

Sorry for the bump


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: Spendulus on November 10, 2014, 03:55:32 AM
A very verbal member of the community let one too many rants go wrong. I suggest we move on...

Sorry for the bump

+1 . Shit happens. I'm sure Bruno is allowed to make a mistake as he has been an outstanding member of this forum for a very long time. IF he does have info then so be it and it will come out with time I'm sure. Either way, I've been watching from the sidelines until someone with a sane brain stepped ( blindmayrbitcorn) to see if we can calm both sides.  What is up with that skype chat? :o

A.  An accusation of pedo is not a conviction and may be groundless.
B.  Any one could be cut some slack for going crazy once in a blue moon.



Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: bg002h on November 10, 2014, 04:31:39 AM
What?  This is bullshit!  Some kook comes in here, splashes information and claims about 27 girls being raped by a board member, then he says some dumb bitch in his family is depressed so he is going to stop the allegations.  That is HEAVILY slander per se.  This guy Bruce is a total fraud and derelict.  He should absolutely be ostracized forever from the bitcoin community.  If he comes around here yet again slinging his false shit about the place, he and his made up garbage should be stricken from record.  I call for action.  This has gone too far this time.

(ref: this thread - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=851373.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=851373.0))

If Patrick Murck isn't a pedo, this kook job Bruce Kucinskas should pay hell for being such a raging dick.  I thought it was all true yesterday.  The way I look at it now is someone is going down absolutely.  Either Murck is a pedo and needs to be removed from Earth - or Bruno Kucinskas is a raging fucking liar and slanderer of the highest order and needs to receive full and just punishment for levying outrageous false allegations against an upstanding Bitcoin citizen who works very hard at the highest level for the benefit of all of us.  

I demand action!!  You should too.  Don't stand idle and allow such bullshit to rip apart the community.  

I am now unlocking this thread.  

Yep. I didn't think this through, acting while pissed off now put my family, some located in other states, possibly in danger, but definitely now in various degrees of depression, one of which was already in a severe state but slowly recovering, but now thanks to my actions, and possibly somebody from Patrick's camp being responsibly, she's relapsed, thus it's prudent I cease communicating on this issue and am about to pass what I have to proper authorities.

I'm now locking this thread, along with the other recent threads that are TBF related.

~Bruno Kucinskas




Just ignore trolling…it's not worth getting worked up over. Trolls are irrelevant.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: LiteCoinGuy on November 10, 2014, 09:39:09 AM
No one has presented any evidence about Murck.

I don't know any of the parties involved. I'm not very active on the forum, but from my lurking I remembered this:

In May 2014, Bruno (as Phinneaus Gage) started a thread "I just paid the $100K USD via BTC to become a Platinum Member of TBF." Later in the day on that thread he admitted that he hadn't done this and he had made the thread to make a point about KnC's possible non-payment to TBF.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=621770.msg6891010#msg6891010 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=621770.msg6891010#msg6891010)

I suspect the simplest explanation is that Bruno was upset by Murck's dismissal of Bruno's concerns in the recent Reddit AMA and he, for some reason, thought accusing Murck of being a pedophile would be a reasonable way to amplify his concerns. (It obviously wasn't.)

If this is what happened, I would hope that Bruno would apologize and then seek some psychological help.  My suggestion isn't intended to be mean. I'm not angry and I really don't want to get involved. But I honestly do think Bruno may need psychological help and, if so, I hope he asks for it (not on the forum, obviously). This isn't something a healthy person would do.

Finally, remember that no one has presented any evidence about Murck. I hope no one is believing this. He hasn't been credibly accused of anything.

i never read something bad from Murck but now alot sick stuff from Bruno alias Phinneaus Gage alias....how many names has he?
Disgusting accusations from mad Bruno in my view.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: Lethn on November 10, 2014, 09:39:44 AM
Question everything, assume nothing.

Indeed no information from either side
So at a standpoint of not sure if Gage is throwing false pedo stuff again or if its legit.


I did defend him once but that was because I saw the whole thread involved ( the whole nigger thing was ridiculous and just typical of morons on the internet ) but false rape or paedophile accusations can ruin a persons life because with men in particular no one is going to hear them out with how blatantly sexist everyone is, if you think about it, how many times have you heard a wide report about women getting treated this way? Very rarely happens because loads of people have their own stereotypical view women can't be rapists.

There are plenty of ways and reasons to attack other people for their stupidity and the Bitcoin foundation has repeatedly proven themselves to be self-interested despite their claims about how they represent the community. What pisses me off now is how I've seen almost everyone use racism or child paedophilia against someone who they disagree with when they can't make a logical argument against them.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: Piston Honda on November 10, 2014, 02:40:50 PM
It sucks (and is super annoying) when personal stuff shows up in the BTC world (but I guess it happens)...like with anything else. ugh.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: TKeenan on November 10, 2014, 05:05:43 PM
A very verbal member of the community let one too many rants go wrong. I suggest we move on...

Sorry for the bump

I'm sure Bruno is allowed to make a mistake...

What?!  Shouting out that someone is a pedophile is a mistake.  It is highly damaging to a person and it is seriously illegal.  Bruno is an outrageous liar, slanderer and fool.  Clearly a lunatic in a very bad state of disorder.  He should be medicated at least and probably jailed. 

'Given a break'?  No way.  You just can't call people out by saying they raped 27 little girls.  That is not a mistake which can be overlooked. 

Bruno needs to be held to account. 


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: Gleb Gamow on November 10, 2014, 05:20:30 PM
A very verbal member of the community let one too many rants go wrong. I suggest we move on...

Sorry for the bump

I'm sure Bruno is allowed to make a mistake...

What?!  Shouting out that someone is a pedophile is a mistake.  It is highly damaging to a person and it is seriously illegal.  Bruno is an outrageous liar, slanderer and fool.  Clearly a lunatic in a very bad state of disorder.  He should be medicated at least and probably jailed. 

'Given a break'?  No way.  You just can't call people out by saying they raped 27 little girls.  That is not a mistake which can be overlooked. 

Bruno needs to be held to account. 

Fair enough, and to be accountable by Patrick Murck's lawsuit, ergo you've done your bidding well, having no qualms with that. The qualms I do have now is having this episode continue after I've already mentioned a few times that lives are now at risk.


~Bruno Kucinskas


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: bg002h on November 10, 2014, 06:48:56 PM
A very verbal member of the community let one too many rants go wrong. I suggest we move on...

Sorry for the bump

I'm sure Bruno is allowed to make a mistake...

What?!  Shouting out that someone is a pedophile is a mistake.  It is highly damaging to a person and it is seriously illegal.  Bruno is an outrageous liar, slanderer and fool.  Clearly a lunatic in a very bad state of disorder.  He should be medicated at least and probably jailed. 

'Given a break'?  No way.  You just can't call people out by saying they raped 27 little girls.  That is not a mistake which can be overlooked. 

Bruno needs to be held to account. 

He is trolling in a very bad way, to be sure. Might be illegal (IANAL). That said, Bruno has done a lot of good and had a good reputation and we all knew he was a little quirky. But he was accepted...but it's gone too far now.

It is sad.

If you need help Bruno, ask.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: RodeoX on November 10, 2014, 06:58:09 PM
It should not be news around here. Unless Bruno is on your ignore list, you probably know of his crackpotedness.  ::)


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: TKeenan on November 10, 2014, 08:48:50 PM
A very verbal member of the community let one too many rants go wrong. I suggest we move on...

Sorry for the bump

I'm sure Bruno is allowed to make a mistake...

What?!  Shouting out that someone is a pedophile is a mistake.  It is highly damaging to a person and it is seriously illegal.  Bruno is an outrageous liar, slanderer and fool.  Clearly a lunatic in a very bad state of disorder.  He should be medicated at least and probably jailed. 

'Given a break'?  No way.  You just can't call people out by saying they raped 27 little girls.  That is not a mistake which can be overlooked. 

Bruno needs to be held to account. 

Fair enough, and to be accountable by Patrick Murck's lawsuit, ergo you've done your bidding well, having no qualms with that. The qualms I do have now is having this episode continue after I've already mentioned a few times that lives are now at risk.


~Bruno Kucinskas

Lives are not at risk.  Patrick Murck is an honorable guy who doesn't do the things you said he does and doesn't threaten lives of people he doesn't like.  There are no lives at risk.

This is all in your head.  You are a well known whack job and you are breaking the law and seriously harming the good reputation of people who work everyday to improve bitcoin.  Murck has no time at all to waste doing a lawsuit against a psycho.  That is very time consuming and he is busy doing actual work which actually produces some good effect on the system.  Unlike you who yells pedophile every time you don't like something. 

Because a lawsuit won't come - as it is a severe waste of time for Murck, it is to the community to discipline these assholes.  Bruno and Bruce are complete nut jobs and they should not be allowed to scream out loud that others are pedophiles without consequence.  It is outrageous that some come here to suggest we can overlook this somehow because this guy contributed at some other time.  That is not enough to give someone the right to destroy others by screaming that the rape 27 young girls.

People who suggest we allow Bruno to remain in the community can expect a community of high disorder and chaos and lawlessness.  While so many of the bitcoin community love the stupid notion of anarchy - it is merely because they don't really get what that is. 

Please stop defending this asshole, stop accepting such horrible behavior, and stop Bruno from ruining the lives of those at the very head of the effort to make bitcoin a great system for all. 

I still haven't seen any retraction nor apology which is where we all should start the path to putting this behind us.  Bruno is the lowest form of scum and isn't going to get off this charge by saying: 'they are trying to kill my family".  That is just more bullshit on top of the other bullshit. 






Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: TKeenan on November 10, 2014, 08:53:32 PM
Bruno has done a lot of good and had a good reputation and we all knew he was a little quirky.

How can you characterize a person who falsely accuses another of raping 27 girls - ' a little quirky'?  If you dismiss this type of extreme behavior from Bruno as 'quirky' you invite a kind of outrageousness that will cause so much potential to destroy.  Bruno is not 'quirky' he is criminally slanderous and outrageous.  I wish someone would please consider the damage he is causing. 



Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: TKeenan on November 10, 2014, 08:55:56 PM
The qualms I do have now is having this episode continue after I've already mentioned a few times that lives are now at risk.

~Bruno Kucinskas
Paranoid much?  Nobody is attacking your family - that is all in your head with the other bullshit which you imagine all day long.  Patrick Murck has many important things to do all day - rather than deal with lunatics whose only contribution is to stimulate disorder and outrage. 

If you want to help bitcoin, shoot yourself in the head. 


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: Lethn on November 10, 2014, 08:58:02 PM
Quote
People who suggest we allow Bruno to remain in the community can expect a community of high disorder and chaos and lawlessness.  While so many of the bitcoin community love the stupid notion of anarchy - it is merely because they don't really get what that is.

Please stop equating Anarchism to chaos like people who don't understand what Anarchism is do and I might take you seriously, the fact there are people out there who believe that people can't live their lives in peace without being beaten and jailed by police officers pisses me off, the least you can do before lecturing somebody about Anarchism is read up on it.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: cr1776 on November 10, 2014, 09:07:19 PM
It should not be news around here. Unless Bruno is on your ignore list, you probably know of his crackpotedness.  ::)

I think he has long passed "crackpottedness" now into something more serious and severe.  ;-)

For what it is worth, he should remove his threads that started this (latest) episode and retract the statements.   :)  I don't know either of them personally, but you can tell a lot from the posts.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: BlindMayorBitcorn on November 10, 2014, 10:01:02 PM
The qualms I do have now is having this episode continue after I've already mentioned a few times that lives are now at risk.

~Bruno Kucinskas
Paranoid much?  Nobody is attacking your family - that is all in your head with the other bullshit which you imagine all day long.  Patrick Murck has many important things to do all day - rather than deal with lunatics whose only contribution is to stimulate disorder and outrage. 

If you want to help bitcoin, shoot yourself in the head. 
[/b]

Holy shit, dude! Are you Patrick Murck's keeper? You have no skin in this game. It's now clearly between the two of them. Lay off


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: Spendulus on November 10, 2014, 10:24:03 PM
The qualms I do have now is having this episode continue after I've already mentioned a few times that lives are now at risk.

~Bruno Kucinskas
Paranoid much?  Nobody is attacking your family - that is all in your head with the other bullshit which you imagine all day long.  Patrick Murck has many important things to do all day - rather than deal with lunatics whose only contribution is to stimulate disorder and outrage. 

If you want to help bitcoin, shoot yourself in the head. 
[/b]

Holy shit, dude! Are you Patrick Murck's keeper? You have no skin in this game. It's now clearly between the two of them. Lay off

Not only that, but given the escalation of this debacle, we'll never find out about the missing 100K from Knc, now.



Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: MineForeman.com on November 11, 2014, 12:46:24 AM
we'll never find out about the missing 100K from Knc, now.

It was never missing and just more FUD, KnC paid via bitpay to TBF.  Bruno wanted a bitcoin transaction ID and since it was via bitpay TBF did not have one (bitpay do that on purpose so that the receiver gets as little amount of information on the payee as possible).

Just more FUD.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: LiteCoinGuy on November 11, 2014, 04:17:44 AM
http://eng3122.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/psycho-house.jpg


i guess "Bruno" lives there.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: fryarminer on November 11, 2014, 07:03:24 AM
A very verbal member of the community let one too many rants go wrong. I suggest we move on...

Sorry for the bump

+1 . Shit happens. I'm sure Bruno is allowed to make a mistake as he has been an outstanding member of this forum for a very long time. IF he does have info then so be it and it will come out with time I'm sure. Either way, I've been watching from the sidelines until someone with a sane brain stepped ( blindmayrbitcorn) to see if we can calm both sides.  What is up with that skype chat? :o

Ruining someone's life and reputation by a pedophile accusation is the very worst thing that can be done to someone, especially if it is false.
The accuser should be thrown in jail and then have to report as being a sex offender for the rest of his life, just so he can feel what his false accusation has caused.

This is no "shit happens". This is the worst of the worst.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: LiteCoinGuy on November 11, 2014, 08:58:17 AM
A very verbal member of the community let one too many rants go wrong. I suggest we move on...

Sorry for the bump

+1 . Shit happens. I'm sure Bruno is allowed to make a mistake as he has been an outstanding member of this forum for a very long time. IF he does have info then so be it and it will come out with time I'm sure. Either way, I've been watching from the sidelines until someone with a sane brain stepped ( blindmayrbitcorn) to see if we can calm both sides.  What is up with that skype chat? :o

Ruining someone's life and reputation by a pedophile accusation is the very worst thing that can be done to someone, especially if it is false.
The accuser should be thrown in jail and then have to report as being a sex offender for the rest of his life, just so he can feel what his false accusation has caused.

This is no "shit happens". This is the worst of the worst.


exactly.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: 2dogs on November 11, 2014, 10:09:43 AM
The qualms I do have now is having this episode continue after I've already mentioned a few times that lives are now at risk.

~Bruno Kucinskas
Paranoid much?  Nobody is attacking your family - that is all in your head with the other bullshit which you imagine all day long.  Patrick Murck has many important things to do all day - rather than deal with lunatics whose only contribution is to stimulate disorder and outrage.  

If you want to help bitcoin, shoot yourself in the head.  
[/b]

Holy shit, dude! Are you Patrick Murck's keeper? You have no skin in this game. It's now clearly between the two of them. Lay off

Exactly right, BlindMayorBitcorn.

What are you trying to do here, TKeenan, hold a kangaroo court on the forum?



Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: Lethn on November 11, 2014, 10:27:39 AM
That's exactly what people like TKeenan want to do really, believe it or not I've actually seen people usurp entire communities with these kind of tactics, because they pin the blame on the moderators, believe it or not it was actually over a paedophilia accusation as well, the only reason they succeeded was because it was moderator that was getting accused and not just some random member that could get easily banned. I will be watching for this kind of shit, very, very closely, don't give credence to any of these guys who think they can get anything done by spreading bullshit about people. If any of it's true, then it should be reported to the police for investigation, however if it's not, then shut the fuck up on either end and stop trying to destroy a community over it.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: TKeenan on November 11, 2014, 03:35:40 PM
Holy shit, dude! Are you Patrick Murck's keeper? You have no skin in this game. It's now clearly between the two of them. Lay off
We all have skin in this game.  Murck is a highly educated guy sitting in the top seat of the effort to advance Bitcoin's cause before the eyes of all of government.  Kicking that guy in the face is a very bad idea.  I don't give a shit about him personally, but he is presently in a position to do the most good for bitcoin. 


Ruining someone's life and reputation by a pedophile accusation is the very worst thing that can be done to someone, especially if it is false.
The accuser should be thrown in jail and then have to report as being a sex offender for the rest of his life, just so he can feel what his false accusation has caused.

This is no "shit happens". This is the worst of the worst.
True. 

Bruno thinks it is funny to hide behind his keyboard and fling shit around the place to advance his very stupid cause.


If any of it's true, then it should be reported to the police for investigation, however if it's not, then shut the fuck up on either end and stop trying to destroy a community over it.
This pink tutu wearing asshole threatens to spread shit all over the good hard working members of the community because he has a brain defect which causes him to draw bizarre conclusions.  No matter what, when he gets upset he should be allowed to shout 'pedophile' from the hilltops.  He has done this same trick before against another board member and it has caused very serious problems. 

If anyone talks to this dick ever again, I'd think they should be ashamed that they propagate his idiocy. 

Bruno is a freak - and a very dangerous one at that.  Please stay clear of this madman.



Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: Gleb Gamow on November 11, 2014, 04:27:47 PM
A very verbal member of the community let one too many rants go wrong. I suggest we move on...

Sorry for the bump

+1 . Shit happens. I'm sure Bruno is allowed to make a mistake as he has been an outstanding member of this forum for a very long time. IF he does have info then so be it and it will come out with time I'm sure. Either way, I've been watching from the sidelines until someone with a sane brain stepped ( blindmayrbitcorn) to see if we can calm both sides.  What is up with that skype chat? :o

Ruining someone's life and reputation by a pedophile accusation is the very worst thing that can be done to someone, especially if it is false.
The accuser should be thrown in jail and then have to report as being a sex offender for the rest of his life, just so he can feel what his false accusation has caused.

This is no "shit happens". This is the worst of the worst.

Please tell me the funny part again where one's reputation is ruined by being accused of being a pedophile: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmaRTZpJgPA

Then, tell me the funny part where BitPay was not aware of BFL using them to launder in excess of ten million dollars.

Then, tell me the funny part where notables left TBF ONLY because they wanted to explore other options, leaving the venerable Patrick Murck in charge, the same Patrick Murck that was instrumental in fucking up Bitcoinica.

Surely, you guys don't possess the same genes that Bruce Peterson has as he adamently defends BFL's actions, thus defending Patrick Murck, do you? You guys are on the wrong side of the fence in spite of being told otherwise.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: deluxeCITY on November 11, 2014, 05:18:30 PM
A very verbal member of the community let one too many rants go wrong. I suggest we move on...

Sorry for the bump

+1 . Shit happens. I'm sure Bruno is allowed to make a mistake as he has been an outstanding member of this forum for a very long time. IF he does have info then so be it and it will come out with time I'm sure. Either way, I've been watching from the sidelines until someone with a sane brain stepped ( blindmayrbitcorn) to see if we can calm both sides.  What is up with that skype chat? :o

Ruining someone's life and reputation by a pedophile accusation is the very worst thing that can be done to someone, especially if it is false.
The accuser should be thrown in jail and then have to report as being a sex offender for the rest of his life, just so he can feel what his false accusation has caused.

This is no "shit happens". This is the worst of the worst.
I agree that making false accusations is something that you very much should not do, however it is not a criminal offense. If someone is making these kind of false claims then they can be held liable for slander/libel (depending on how they made the claims) which is a civil offense. 


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: btcusury on November 11, 2014, 05:33:25 PM
paranoia.  You started this war.  If it turns out you made that shit up about Murck - you need to be severely dealt with.  I say you have 24 hours to produce legitimate evidence - or that which they have planned for you and your family was well deserved.  I'll even send them money if someone posts a bitcoin address to support their counterattack on you and your family.  This isn't the first time you came around here yelling "Pedophile".  If it is not true, you are way overdue for being shut down.

Dude, WTF? You may have a point about reckless accusations, but I didn't see Phin even mentioning Murck's family.

Murck has no time at all to waste doing a lawsuit against a psycho.  That is very time consuming and he is busy doing actual work which actually produces some good effect on the system.

Just out of curiosity, can you give some examples of such "actual work"?

Quote
People who suggest we allow Bruno to remain in the community can expect a community of high disorder and chaos and lawlessness.  While so many of the bitcoin community love the stupid notion of anarchy - it is merely because they don't really get what that is.

Or could it be you who doesn't really get what it is?

Quote
Please stop defending this asshole, stop accepting such horrible behavior, and stop Bruno from ruining the lives of those at the very head of the effort to make bitcoin a great system for all.

Your behavior is worse than Bruno's, as I point out above. False accusations do not ruin lives (unless the state becomes involved). Anyone can post anything about anyone on the Internet. That's a fact that you have to deal with, regardless of much you may fear non-conformance to arbitrary rules (disorder/"chaos"). And you need to prove your contention that Murck is "at the very head of the effort to make bitcoin a great system for all".

Quote
I still haven't seen any retraction nor apology which is where we all should start the path to putting this behind us.  Bruno is the lowest form of scum and isn't going to get off this charge by saying: 'they are trying to kill my family".  That is just more bullshit on top of the other bullshit.

You are assuming that he doesn't have the evidence he claims he has, which he says he has now handed over to "the appropriate authorities".

Quote
We all have skin in this game.  Murck is a highly educated guy sitting in the top seat of the effort to advance Bitcoin's cause before the eyes of all of government.  Kicking that guy in the face is a very bad idea.  I don't give a shit about him personally, but he is presently in a position to do the most good for bitcoin.

So you want Bitcoin to be approved by "government", I see. Clearly you don't understand what decentralization means (nor what "government" is). You're an obedient order-follower without conscience, correct?


Censorship is never prudent - it is always corrupt.  Let people have their say.  Don't try to control what others think or say.

LOL.  Comments like these are so cute and naive.  You've obviously never had to manage a large number of human beings before.  Painfully obvious.

Its so funny how people like yourself think that only people in power are corrupt.  Its not possible that the myriads of regular people can't also be just as insanely corrupt, and in need of boundaries.

I can only wish upon you the curse of having to manage a large community of people yourself.  So you get to deal with being subjected to the insanity, tinfoil hats, unfounded paranoias, suspicions, and outright lying that comes from the "sheeples".

-B-

So you're saying that censorship is necessary to keep the "sheeples" in line, so that you can "manage" large numbers of them, so that you can feel superior to your fellow human beings. How cute.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: TKeenan on November 11, 2014, 05:36:15 PM
Please tell me the funny part again where one's reputation is ruined by being accused of being a pedophile: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmaRTZpJgPA

Yep, yet another person you've accused of being a pedophile.  This seems to be your MO.  

It's funny because when I see a dirty old fat man in a pink tutu, I wonder about the true nature of that guys sexual deviations.  Maybe there is more to this fetish with other's pedophila - maybe you are projecting things about yourself onto others perhaps?

Bruno - you are not some upstanding citizen defender of bitcoin.  You are a demented whacked-out vulgar pig in a tutu who casts vial accusations onto decent men who do nothing more than work hard for their community.  Anyone who stands up for you is a moron.  



Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: Gleb Gamow on November 11, 2014, 05:38:33 PM
Quote
Dude, WTF? You may have a point about reckless accusations, but I didn't see Phin even mentioning Murck's family.

I'm taxing my memory on that one, not sure sans looking it up if I made reference to some family member in DC during the Bitcoinica episode, but definitely not about wife, kids, etc., nor his home address, of which I don't have at this penning.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: TKeenan on November 11, 2014, 05:39:57 PM
paranoia.  You started this war.  If it turns out you made that shit up about Murck - you need to be severely dealt with.  I say you have 24 hours to produce legitimate evidence - or that which they have planned for you and your family was well deserved.  I'll even send them money if someone posts a bitcoin address to support their counterattack on you and your family.  This isn't the first time you came around here yelling "Pedophile".  If it is not true, you are way overdue for being shut down.

Dude, WTF? You may have a point about reckless accusations, but I didn't see Phin even mentioning Murck's family.

Murck has no time at all to waste doing a lawsuit against a psycho.  That is very time consuming and he is busy doing actual work which actually produces some good effect on the system.

Just out of curiosity, can you give some examples of such "actual work"?


Having trouble following the thread you moron...  It was Bruno's family, not Murck's family.  Try a little harder at reading comprehension.  

"Just out of curiosity, can you give some examples of such "actual work"?"
Oh -  how about testifying before congress?  That could be considered actual work which requires a great deal of skill and intellect.  Did you forget about that?  



Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: btcusury on November 11, 2014, 05:49:29 PM
Having trouble following the thread you moron...  It was Bruno's family, not Murck's family.  Try a little harder at reading comprehension.

I was obviously referring to YOUR reference to Bruno's family, not Bruno's reference (or lack thereof) to Murck's family. You either totally lack reading comprehension, or you're trying to cloud the issue. Read my post again more carefully if it is the former. In either case I am going to insist on this point.

Quote
Oh -  how about testifying before congress?  That could be considered actual work which requires a great deal of skill and intellect.  Did you forget about that?

If he testified before a Sicilian Mafia council, I'd remember that too, but I wouldn't call that "actual work" that helps Bitcoin or cryptocurrency in any way.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: Gleb Gamow on November 11, 2014, 05:52:53 PM
Please tell me the funny part again where one's reputation is ruined by being accused of being a pedophile: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmaRTZpJgPA

Yep, yet another person you've accused of being a pedophile.  This seems to be your MO.  

It's funny because when I see a dirty old fat man in a pink tutu, I wonder about the true nature of that guys sexual deviations.  Maybe there is more to this fetish with other's pedophila - maybe you are projecting things about yourself onto others perhaps?

Bruno - you are not some upstanding citizen defender of bitcoin.  You are a demented whacked-out vulgar pig in a tutu who casts vial accusations onto decent men who do nothing more than work hard for their community.  Anyone who stands up for you is a moron.  



You got me! I was afraid that that ruse wouldn't remain hidden for long. Would you be so kind as to explain to me how you figured it out that I went to the LV conference donning a pink tutu to possibly pick up men to fuck them in the ass oppose to, as I claimed at the time, to bring awareness to http://thetutuproject.com/, pretending that I was seeking for them to embrace Bitcoin as witnessed here: http://letstalkbitcoin.com/e67-the-most-interesting-bitcoiner/

Yep, that was me, pretending to bring further awareness to Bitcoin via getting charities aboard so that to better your Bitcoin position, that after spending nights sleeping on the ground in Pensacola, FL, at Satoshi Forest during Thanksgiving and erecting these signs:

https://i.imgur.com/eXUQ6o4.jpg

Spectacular place. Hopefully I can come and visit some time. Glad to see so much giving on a forum that is filled with greed.
We would love to have you!


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: TKeenan on November 11, 2014, 07:50:15 PM
Quote from: Gleb Gamow link=topic=852890.msg9510684#msg9510684 date=
You got me! I was afraid that that ruse wouldn't remain hidden for long. Would you be so kind as to explain to me how you figured it out that I went to the LV conference donning a pink tutu to possibly pick up men to fuck them in the ass
https://i1.sndcdn.com/artworks-000065559740-51yanu-t500x500.jpg

One thing is clear, the dirty, fat, unkempt, old pervert pictured above shouldn't be calling decent law abiding people pedophiles.  


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: 2dogs on November 11, 2014, 08:05:51 PM

One thing is clear, the dirty, fat, unkempt, old pervert pictured above shouldn't be calling decent law abiding people pedophiles.  


Kettle, meet pot.

(Yawn, this is getting old...)


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: Gleb Gamow on November 11, 2014, 08:44:23 PM
Quote from: Gleb Gamow link=topic=852890.msg9510684#msg9510684 date=
You got me! I was afraid that that ruse wouldn't remain hidden for long. Would you be so kind as to explain to me how you figured it out that I went to the LV conference donning a pink tutu to possibly pick up men to fuck them in the ass
https://i1.sndcdn.com/artworks-000065559740-51yanu-t500x500.jpg

One thing is clear, the dirty, fat, unkempt, old pervert pictured above shouldn't be calling decent law abiding people pedophiles.  

The only thing dirty about me is that I jack off to naked girls having tight pussies and small breast on MFC, whereas in your inner circles you probably wouldn't admit to jacking off, let alone to what.

http://www.avvo.com/attorneys/patrick-murck-1805177.html

Quote
LICENSE

8 years since Patrick A Murck was first licensed to practice law.

State   License status   Year acquired   Last updated by Avvo
Dist. of Columbia   Active   2009   07/19/2014
Virginia   Authorized to practice law   2006   03/11/2014

Quote
WORK EXPERIENCE
Position   Duration
Principal at Engage Legal PLLC   2011–present
Counsel at BigDoor Media, Inc.   2009–2011
Associate Attorney at Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth, PLC   2006–2009

BigDoor Media, Inc. and Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth, PLC, are located in the state of Washington, a place where Patrick A. Murck is forbidden to practice law.

@Phinnaeus In every thread you post about an identity uncovering, they pile on gang bang you like clockwork, 1-2-3. WTF.
Who the fuck is Nemesis that as a newbie starts fucking with the regulars like he's part of the scene already.

Oh, shit...sockpupet! But who?  :-X

They fear that I'm getting too close to the truth, and what really bothers them is that they know that I have no fear of them. I've already given the crossroads of where I live in Sandwich, IL. A picture of my truck is on this forum and said truck is parked in my driveway. I am so easy to find, it's unreal. Anybody is welcome to stop by and confront Bruno anyway they choose. I don't own a gun, nor is there one easily at my disposal, as far as I know. They are welcome to bring whatever weapon they choose and have as many people with them to help complete any task they that may have in mind. Fair warning, though--I do have two lines of defense to protect myself. One, is my dog, of which I've posted an image of here many a times. The other, well I guess they will have to find that out for themselves. Although I don't take threats lightly, getting threaten does give me solace. It's been said that it's the silent types one should fear.

That said, expect more leaks, soon--by me. I'm not yet done with the Patrick Murck and Zhou Tong research, therefore will need to hold off on disclosing what else I've found.

Maybe I should take a couple days off and fully enjoy a long visit to myfreecams.com. Did you know that some of those girls have already been accepting Bitcoin? They get paid in blocks of 50 to their addresses and then let them set there, not cashing them out. Wait till you find out where that investigation leads. Hint: It involves another major hack(?) a while back that seems to be completely forgotten or, dare I say, brush under Rassah's coffee table (does not concern Rassah), and I'm not talking about MyBitCoin, although there may be a connection, but I've yet to make it. All the same, it'll be a breakthrough nonetheless. The reason for holding back is that I either need to present a more convincing argument with my current investigations or be prepared to give everybody here BlowBobs due to my incompetence. Please, Jehovah, let it be the former.

Once I've completed my current investigations, I'll proceed with the one I've just outlined above. Perhaps, by then, my ignore count will be lowered to, I don't know, maybe zero?

To all other concerns, feel free to continue emailing me. I enjoy the reads.

~Bruno~


Hey Forums, I am Patrick Murck,

I have clients in several states, but my firm is based out of Washington, DC. The type of work I do you could hire a firm anywhere to do: it's Federal law.  When something comes up that requires state law knowledge (in NY or WA, or wherever) that is contracted to someone licensed to practice there.

I cannot comment on any questions covered by Attorney-Client privilege, but if you'd like to ask me something, you can email me at patrick at engagelegal dot com.

Are you unaware as to how Patrick Murck was instrumental in fucking those who had BTC on account at Bitcoinica?


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: TKeenan on November 11, 2014, 09:04:30 PM
The only thing dirty about me is that I jack off to naked girls having tight pussies and small breast
Do you admit to being a vulgar filthy pig then?
Whether or not someone jerks off is a rather private matter which should not be splashed about in a public forum.  Decent educated folks don't bother writing the details of such matters - whether or not they engage in such practices.


The only thing dirty about me...
Do you admit to being fat, unkempt, perverted and ugly too?


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: Gleb Gamow on November 11, 2014, 09:23:26 PM
The only thing dirty about me is that I jack off to naked girls having tight pussies and small breast
Do you admit to being a vulgar filthy pig then?
Whether or not someone jerks off is a rather private matter which should not be splashed about in a public forum.  Decent educated folks don't bother writing the details of such matters - whether or not they engage in such practices.


The only thing dirty about me...
Do you admit to being fat, unkempt, perverted and ugly too?

If I were, I would admit it, again ONLY perverted if it pertains to jacking off to... I have in the past gone several days sans a shower if that's considered being unkempt. Fat, maybe, depending on what standards are used, but definitely not obese.

You know what? I've kinda grown fond of this thread now that it's grown, with possibly more eyeballs now able to view it with the hope of somebody digging up where I left off.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: TKeenan on November 11, 2014, 10:38:53 PM
If I were, I would admit it, again ONLY perverted if it pertains to jacking off to... I have in the past gone several days sans a shower if that's considered being unkempt. Fat, maybe, depending on what standards are used, but definitely not obese.

You are perverted in that you wear pink tutus in public.  Your beard is a god-damned fire hazard - forget about missing a shower one day.  You definitely are obese: http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/adult/defining.html (http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/adult/defining.html) according to the CDC.  In addition, according to any objective observer you are obese.  To some, you are a fat filthy pig.  To me, you are a fat filthy pig and a liar. 

You can't go around calling people a pedo without evidence to back it up.  Murck is probably a 100% upstanding guy and hard worker for the bitcoin community.   For you to slam him because you are an eccentric asshole, just isn't right.  I wish he'd sue you.  But as I mentioned earlier, he has important work to do rather than pay any attention at all to a buffoon in a pink tutu. 



Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: leopard2 on November 12, 2014, 12:01:12 AM
I am not taking sides, but threads like this (and the attitudes behind it) are one of the reasons BTC is still not taken seriously by most people. Are there psychiatrists that accept Bitcoin?  :o


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: BlindMayorBitcorn on November 12, 2014, 12:03:14 AM
If I were, I would admit it, again ONLY perverted if it pertains to jacking off to... I have in the past gone several days sans a shower if that's considered being unkempt. Fat, maybe, depending on what standards are used, but definitely not obese.

You are perverted in that you wear pink tutus in public.  Your beard is a god-damned fire hazard - forget about missing a shower one day.  You definitely are obese: http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/adult/defining.html (http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/adult/defining.html) according to the CDC.  In addition, according to any objective observer you are obese.  To some, you are a fat filthy pig.  To me, you are a fat filthy pig and a liar.  

You can't go around calling people a pedo without evidence to back it up.  Murck is probably a 100% upstanding guy and hard worker for the bitcoin community.   For you to slam him because you are an eccentric asshole, just isn't right.  I wish he'd sue you.  But as I mentioned earlier, he has important work to do rather than pay any attention at all to a buffoon in a pink tutu.  



What are we allowed to call Brock Pierce, just for the record?  :P


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: MineForeman.com on November 12, 2014, 12:20:06 AM
What are we allowed to call Brock Pierce, just for the record?  :P

It get complicated..... I suppose "someone that associated with someone else that was later convicted a peodofile" is a bit of a mountful.

Not sure we have a word for that :P .


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: Gleb Gamow on November 12, 2014, 08:32:07 AM
If I were, I would admit it, again ONLY perverted if it pertains to jacking off to... I have in the past gone several days sans a shower if that's considered being unkempt. Fat, maybe, depending on what standards are used, but definitely not obese.

You are perverted in that you wear pink tutus in public.  Your beard is a god-damned fire hazard - forget about missing a shower one day.  You definitely are obese: http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/adult/defining.html (http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/adult/defining.html) according to the CDC.  In addition, according to any objective observer you are obese.  To some, you are a fat filthy pig.  To me, you are a fat filthy pig and a liar. 

You can't go around calling people a pedo without evidence to back it up.  Murck is probably a 100% upstanding guy and hard worker for the bitcoin community.   For you to slam him because you are an eccentric asshole, just isn't right.  I wish he'd sue you.  But as I mentioned earlier, he has important work to do rather than pay any attention at all to a buffoon in a pink tutu. 



Dully noted. Thank you kindly for your contribution to this fine thread. I look forward to reading your next post about how I'm a filthy pig that dons a tutu and that some lawyer is a fine outstanding citizen.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: UsernameBitcoin on November 12, 2014, 10:24:16 AM
If I were, I would admit it, again ONLY perverted if it pertains to jacking off to... I have in the past gone several days sans a shower if that's considered being unkempt. Fat, maybe, depending on what standards are used, but definitely not obese.

You are perverted in that you wear pink tutus in public.  Your beard is a god-damned fire hazard - forget about missing a shower one day.  You definitely are obese: http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/adult/defining.html (http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/adult/defining.html) according to the CDC.  In addition, according to any objective observer you are obese.  To some, you are a fat filthy pig.  To me, you are a fat filthy pig and a liar. 

You can't go around calling people a pedo without evidence to back it up.  Murck is probably a 100% upstanding guy and hard worker for the bitcoin community.   For you to slam him because you are an eccentric asshole, just isn't right.  I wish he'd sue you.  But as I mentioned earlier, he has important work to do rather than pay any attention at all to a buffoon in a pink tutu. 


Dully noted. Thank you kindly for your contribution to this fine thread. I look forward to reading your next post about how I'm a filthy pig that dons a tutu and that some lawyer is a fine outstanding citizen.


Since you haven't released any proof and focus on talking trash, I assume you have no proof, and you're just a fucked up loony craving for attention. Release your info or gtfo, waste of time reading your posts otherwise.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: btcusury on November 12, 2014, 03:16:42 PM
OMG, Phin is obese?? I can't believe I ever said a word that could be construed as defending him!

Let's sum up this thread:

TKeenan has a very valid point about reckless accusations, and points out that if indeed Phin doesn't have the evidence that he said he has, he deserves to be shamed.

But then TKeenan surrounds that valid point with even nastier insults, even desiring harm to Phin's family.

So, TKeenan, perhaps you should question things more, including your own emotions.

I am not taking sides, but threads like this (and the attitudes behind it) are one of the reasons BTC is still not taken seriously by most people. Are there psychiatrists that accept Bitcoin?  :o

The sample size you are judging is perhaps 0.0001% of Bitcoin users, so I don't see how you can make such an extrapolation...


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: TKeenan on November 12, 2014, 04:46:54 PM
even nastier insults, even desiring harm to Phin's family.
lol!  Good one.  nastier insults?  Did you mean facts? 

Alleging that a guy is a pedo is some serious business and highly illegal when untrue.  Calling a guy obese is merely factual.  Look at the CDC definition and you will see it is correct to characterize that fat pig as a fat pig. 

'Desires harm to his family'?  Nope.  I never desired anything of the sort.  I just mentioned that is what Murck ought to do to him.  What I desire is that that filthy fat pig roll about in the pig sty that he lives in and suffer from being surrounded by the mud he created. 

Phin is a world class idiot and conspiracy theorist.  Which normally I don't give a fuck about.  But when a good hard working honest man is slandered so profoundly, I am going to splash a little mud back in that direction.  Everyone in this community should also push back when some out of control idiot starts behaving in a manner which upsets the good order.  We can't rely on the courts to do this function.  It is a self-policing environment.  But to defend such a shithead and his behavior is also the work of morons.  Continue as you like.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: TKeenan on November 12, 2014, 04:48:27 PM
Dully noted. Thank you kindly for your contribution to this fine thread. I look forward to reading your next post about how I'm a filthy pig that dons a pink tutu and that some lawyer is a fine outstanding citizen.

I like the implication that because someone is a lawyer they are not a fine outstanding citizen. 


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: Gleb Gamow on November 12, 2014, 06:11:17 PM
even nastier insults, even desiring harm to Phin's family.
lol!  Good one.  nastier insults?  Did you mean facts? 

Alleging that a guy is a pedo is some serious business and highly illegal when untrue.  Calling a guy obese is merely factual.  Look at the CDC definition and you will see it is correct to characterize that fat pig as a fat pig. 

'Desires harm to his family'?  Nope.  I never desired anything of the sort.  I just mentioned that is what Murck ought to do to him.  What I desire is that that filthy fat pig roll about in the pig sty that he lives in and suffer from being surrounded by the mud he created. 

Phin is a world class idiot and conspiracy theorist.  Which normally I don't give a fuck about.  But when a good hard working honest man is slandered so profoundly, I am going to splash a little mud back in that direction.  Everyone in this community should also push back when some out of control idiot starts behaving in a manner which upsets the good order.  We can't rely on the courts to do this function.  It is a self-policing environment.  But to defend such a shithead and his behavior is also the work of morons.  Continue as you like.

I don't believe that being 6' 3 1/2" at 255 lbs is considered obese.

While you may maintain that Patrick Murck is some sort of outstanding individual, there's a many on this forum who've echoed the opposite prior to me joining their choir. I suggest you review his history on this very forum via the search option thingy.

While you're at it, search the internet via Google to learn firsthand how instrumental Patrick was in advancing Big Door Media's currency endeavors oppose to him just being their lawyer in a state he's not allowed to practice law.

Then, come back to this forum and learn why Patrick thought it prudent to put Bitcoinica's bitcoins on the Mt Gox exchange for safe keeping because he and Mark Karpeles were buds at TBF.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: TheTribesman on November 12, 2014, 07:47:23 PM
http://www.myfacewhen.net/uploads/6421-michael-jackson-eating-popcorn.gif


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: TKeenan on November 12, 2014, 07:56:20 PM
I don't believe that being 6' 3 1/2" at 255 lbs is considered obese.
Most vulgar fat pigs who need a shave and a shower also think they are not obese.  Indeed, it is not my definition, but one put forth by your elected officials under the cover of 'CDC'.  Go deal with them if you don't like the label - you fat pig.  As if we needed any definition to figure it out, simply look at the photograph.

Patrick was in advancing Big Door Media's currency endeavors oppose to him just being their lawyer in a state he's not allowed to practice law.

Patrick thought it prudent to put Bitcoinica's bitcoins on the Mt Gox exchange for safe keeping because he and Mark Karpeles were buds at TBF.
These are very interesting allegations.  Maybe people would have listened to you if you brought these charges rather than saying he raped 27 little girls.  But since your accusations were about sex with little girls, the table turned and all can see it is you that is the real kook.  Especially since there are pictures of you prancing about in public in a pink tutu and internet admissions that you enjoy jerking off to tight pussy.  

It is not hard for even dumb people to understand who the freak is.  



Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: Gleb Gamow on November 12, 2014, 10:18:08 PM
I don't believe that being 6' 3 1/2" at 255 lbs is considered obese.
Most vulgar fat pigs who need a shave and a shower also think they are not obese.  Indeed, it is not my definition, but one put forth by your elected officials under the cover of 'CDC'.  Go deal with them if you don't like the label - you fat pig.  As if we needed any definition to figure it out, simply look at the photograph.

Patrick was in advancing Big Door Media's currency endeavors oppose to him just being their lawyer in a state he's not allowed to practice law.

Patrick thought it prudent to put Bitcoinica's bitcoins on the Mt Gox exchange for safe keeping because he and Mark Karpeles were buds at TBF.
These are very interesting allegations.  Maybe people would have listened to you if you brought these charges rather than saying he raped 27 little girls.  But since your accusations were about sex with little girls, the table turned and all can see it is you that is the real kook.  Especially since there are pictures of you prancing about in public in a pink tutu and internet admissions that you enjoy jerking off to tight pussy.  

It is not hard for even dumb people to understand who the freak is.  



Can't you do better than the obese thingy?

So, I look like a kook. Big deal!

Here's a video of another grown man prancing around like a fuckin' idiot probably pretending he wife has cancer and is only using his website to steal monies from people who donate to his ruse, one was pretending to get to accept bitcoins on his website because Bitcoin is made up of people like you and me and Patrick Murck: Pink Tutu Project: Fighting cancer one tutu at a time (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SfTOVdZvxiU)

Continue with you this fine thread we both have going here, for I have no issue with me being portrayed as a kook as long as you don't mind being portrayed as one also.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: bg002h on November 12, 2014, 10:59:29 PM
Bruno has done a lot of good and had a good reputation and we all knew he was a little quirky.

How can you characterize a person who falsely accuses another of raping 27 girls - ' a little quirky'?  If you dismiss this type of extreme behavior from Bruno as 'quirky' you invite a kind of outrageousness that will cause so much potential to destroy.  Bruno is not 'quirky' he is criminally slanderous and outrageous.  I wish someone would please consider the damage he is causing. 



You quoted the wrong part.  The quote is in past tense and is describing his previous behavior.  My condemnation of his accusations are in present tense in my post. 


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: BlindMayorBitcorn on November 12, 2014, 11:22:38 PM
I don't believe that being 6' 3 1/2" at 255 lbs is considered obese.
Most vulgar fat pigs who need a shave and a shower also think they are not obese.  Indeed, it is not my definition, but one put forth by your elected officials under the cover of 'CDC'.  Go deal with them if you don't like the label - you fat pig.  As if we needed any definition to figure it out, simply look at the photograph.

Patrick was in advancing Big Door Media's currency endeavors oppose to him just being their lawyer in a state he's not allowed to practice law.

Patrick thought it prudent to put Bitcoinica's bitcoins on the Mt Gox exchange for safe keeping because he and Mark Karpeles were buds at TBF.
These are very interesting allegations.  Maybe people would have listened to you if you brought these charges rather than saying he raped 27 little girls.  But since your accusations were about sex with little girls, the table turned and all can see it is you that is the real kook.  Especially since there are pictures of you prancing about in public in a pink tutu and internet admissions that you enjoy jerking off to tight pussy.  

It is not hard for even dumb people to understand who the freak is.  



You are becoming more and more odious as this thread progresses. Cut your loose, bud


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: TKeenan on November 12, 2014, 11:24:06 PM
Can't you do better than the obese thingy?
I beg pardon.  I did much better.  What about: "unkempt tutu wearing criminal fat filthy pig slanderer"?  Obesity is the least of your worries buddy.  Have you forgotten the others so fast?  I demand proper credit be given.  Don't slight me by omitting the juicy bits.  

Go stand naked in front of a mirror and then hang your head in shame.  And to think, your mind is even more fucked up than your body.  

You are becoming more and more odious as this thread progresses. Cut your loose, bud
'Odious' is smelly.  How is it that you smell me?  The Interwebs are cool - but not that cool.

"Cut your loose, bud"  - OK.  I'll do it.  Whatever that is.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: BlindMayorBitcorn on November 12, 2014, 11:29:52 PM
Can't you do better than the obese thingy?
I beg pardon.  I did much better.  What about: "unkempt tutu wearing criminal fat filthy pig slanderer"?  Obesity is the least of your worries buddy.  Have you forgotten the others so fast?  I demand proper credit be given.  Don't slight me by omitting the juicy bits.  

Go stand naked in front of a mirror and then hang your head in shame.  And to think, your mind is even more fucked up than your body.  

You are becoming more and more odious as this thread progresses. Cut your loose, bud
'Odious' is smelly.  How is it that you smell me?  The Interwebs are cool - but not that cool.

"Cut your loose, bud"  - OK.  I'll do it.  Whatever that is.

Are you really Patrick Murck? Or do you have some sort of white knight fantasy where you ride in on a pony and save him from distress? I don't get it.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: Gleb Gamow on November 12, 2014, 11:34:52 PM
Can't you do better than the obese thingy?
I beg pardon.  I did much better.  What about: "unkempt tutu wearing criminal fat filthy pig slanderer"?  Obesity is the least of your worries buddy.  Have you forgotten the others so fast?  I demand proper credit be given.  Don't slight me by omitting the juicy bits.  

Go stand naked in front of a mirror and then hang your head in shame.  And to think, your mind is even more fucked up than your body.  

You are becoming more and more odious as this thread progresses. Cut your loose, bud
'Odious' is smelly.  How is it that you smell me?  The Interwebs are cool - but not that cool.

"Cut your loose, bud"  - OK.  I'll do it.  Whatever that is.

He probably meant loses, as in cut your loses.

Okay, I stood naked in front of mirror and hung my head in shame. Now what?

Oh, and I give you credit for the juicy omissions I somehow forgot to quote. That make you happy now?

BTW, if we keep meeting up like this, people are going to talk about how you're dating a dirty slopping pink tutu donning pig.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: BlindMayorBitcorn on November 12, 2014, 11:37:25 PM
even nastier insults, even desiring harm to Phin's family.
lol!  Good one.  nastier insults?  Did you mean facts? 

Alleging that a guy is a pedo is some serious business and highly illegal when untrue.  Calling a guy obese is merely factual.  Look at the CDC definition and you will see it is correct to characterize that fat pig as a fat pig. 

'Desires harm to his family'?  Nope.  I never desired anything of the sort.  I just mentioned that is what Murck ought to do to him.  What I desire is that that filthy fat pig roll about in the pig sty that he lives in and suffer from being surrounded by the mud he created. 

Phin is a world class idiot and conspiracy theorist.  Which normally I don't give a fuck about.  But when a good hard working honest man is slandered so profoundly, I am going to splash a little mud back in that direction.  Everyone in this community should also push back when some out of control idiot starts behaving in a manner which upsets the good order.  We can't rely on the courts to do this function.  It is a self-policing environment.  But to defend such a shithead and his behavior is also the work of morons.  Continue as you like.

Right now, that idiot is you


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: TKeenan on November 12, 2014, 11:42:06 PM
He probably meant loses, as in cut your loses.
I doubt it.  He probably meant 'losses'.  But as neither of you passed your third grade spelling class I pretty much figured it out anyway.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: BlindMayorBitcorn on November 12, 2014, 11:42:57 PM
He probably meant loses, as in cut your loses.
I doubt it.  He probably meant 'losses'.  But as neither of you passed your third grade spelling class I pretty much figured it out anyway.

It's, like, a meme, you monkey!


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: Gleb Gamow on November 12, 2014, 11:43:43 PM
He probably meant loses, as in cut your loses.
I doubt it.  He probably meant 'losses'.  But as neither of you passed your third grade spelling class I pretty much figured it out anyway.

darnit i'm lossing this battle with u. me try to do beter


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: TKeenan on November 12, 2014, 11:45:46 PM
That make you happy now?
Nope.  When are we going to get our retraction and unequivocal, unmitigated apology delivered in writing to the honorable Mr. Murck?  I'd be much happier then.  This is, in fact the correct response which is now well overdue.  Could you kindly put remedy to this outstanding bit of unpleasantness?


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: repentance on November 12, 2014, 11:57:14 PM
Are you really Patrick Murck? Or do you have some sort of white knight fantasy where you ride in on a pony and save him from distress? I don't get it.

I don't get it either.  It's perfectly possible to criticise Phin's actions without cheerleading Patrick.  Criticisms of Phin's actions are also more likely to be taken seriously if the dialogue doesn't get side-tracked into personal insults about Phin's weight or personal grooming habits.

Regardless, both sides posting the same thing repeatedly isn't going to be at all productive and it's not going to sway any opinions.

That make you happy now?
Nope.  When are we going to get our retraction and unequivocal, unmitigated apology delivered in writing to the honorable Mr. Murck?  I'd be much happier then.

Who is "we"?  Has Patrick asked for an apology and retraction?  When asked for, the usual procedure is for the retraction and apology to be published in the same media which carried the original statements and not for it to be given privately.  I suspect Phin would have mentioned it if he'd received any communication in this regard.

And seriously, your repeated use of the word "honorable" makes you come across as a complete tosser.  Bitcoin Foundation, its leadership and its role have been contentious since its formation.  Patrick doesn't need to be an "honorable" person in order to be innocent of the particular claim made against him and you trying to portray him as some kind of patron saint of Bitcoin damages your own credibility as well as his.  His role in previous Bitcoin dramas upset a lot of people and was even regarded by some as dishonourable.  Being revisionist doesn't exactly help your - or Patrick's -cause.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: BlindMayorBitcorn on November 12, 2014, 11:57:52 PM
Quote
BTW, if we keep meeting up like this, people are going to talk about how you're dating a dirty slopping pink tutu donning pig.

LOL quote of the year! its like you and him are dating ? LOL

"They will say we're in love, Clarise"



Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: Gleb Gamow on November 13, 2014, 12:04:13 AM
That make you happy now?
Nope.  When are we going to get our retraction and unequivocal, unmitigated apology delivered in writing to the honorable Mr. Murck?  I'd be much happier then.  This is, in fact the correct response which is now well overdue.  Could you kindly put remedy to this outstanding bit of unpleasantness?

Just to make you happy, dear, I'm doing it now, ironically started on it prior to reading your post. It should be done within a couple hours, then sent to him. Will keep you updated, dear.

BTW, what are be doing later this evening after the walk on the beach?

Please accept my apologies if I misspelled any words, four English is hard.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: TKeenan on November 13, 2014, 12:10:02 AM
Who is "we"?  Has Patrick asked for an apology and retraction?
The crime is against community.  The community is due an apology. 

When a man beats his wife, it is a crime against society.  Even if she forgives him and does not prosecute her civil claim, society still goes for a criminal conviction. 

That fat asshole didn't just screw Mr. Murck, he screws everyone.  Everyone who doesn't demand an apology accepts such behavior and further harms the community.  He should be held to account.  That is all.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: TKeenan on November 13, 2014, 12:13:44 AM
I'm doing it now, ironically started on it prior to reading your post. It should be done within a couple hours, then sent to him. Will keep you updated, dear.
This is good news.  Glad to hear it.  Looking forward to the result. 

It might even reestablish a tiny modicum of respect.  However you will still be quite fat.  (notice I didn't say 'obese')


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: repentance on November 13, 2014, 12:32:03 AM

The crime is against community.  The community is due an apology. 


A large section of "the community" regards Bitcoin Foundation and everything it stands for as reprehensible, so to characterise accusations against its leadership as a "crime against community" is beyond hyperbolic.  Many believe the very existence of BF to be a "crime against the Bitcoin community" and the organisation to be rotten to the core.

Now if you had said that Phin often acts impulsively to the point of recklessness when he comes across what he believes is a smoking gun, I would have to agree with you.  An altruistic impulse is still an impulse, and this particular one cannot reflect well on Phin in any way.  His accusations are either baseless - which reflects badly on him - or by not releasing the information he has which supports his assertions he has now become part of the "cover up" - which also reflects badly on him.  Phin's flair for the dramatic has truly bitten him in the ass this time and I suspect no-one is more aware of that than Phin himself.

I'm curious about why you are championing Patrick specifically as any accusations against Patrick reflect also on BF.  If an apology is due to Patrick, one is also due to the Foundation - an organisation whose reputation has already been damaged by the actions of its leaders and whose reputation can only be further damaged by unwarranted allegations against those who replaced them.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: J. J. Phillips on November 13, 2014, 08:14:47 AM
When I commented earlier my position was that Bruno should admit he made up the child molestation nonsense and seek psychological help. Reading his responses on this thread, I've been convinced that he doesn't deserve that kind of patience and understanding, so I apologize for suggesting it. Bruno claimed his "family" was in "danger" and even still didn't try to diffuse the situation by admitting he made up his accusations. Bruno deserves all the mud being slung at him. In fact, I'm now ready to endorse a more realistic option:

If you want to help bitcoin, shoot yourself in the head. 

Let's be realistic here. The main thing Bruno wants is to feel important so he will be remembered. That's why he constantly makes things up and tries to play the hero for "exposing" it. OK, Bruno: When you die a handful of people on a forum will remember you. BUT: If you shoot yourself in the head, far more people will remember you. In fact, perhaps a Phinneaus Gage religion will be founded and for centuries fat priests will grow dumb beards and wear pink tutus. But first you have to shoot yourself in the head.

You will only be remembered as the great man you think you are if you do it while the controversy is hot.

Shoot yourself in the head.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: TheTribesman on November 13, 2014, 09:30:47 AM
#OBVIOUS STATEMENT START#
As many a jailed troll, disgraced politician, or ex-employee has discovered to their dismay, be careful what you post on the internet. It may come back to bite you at some point in the future.
#OBVIOUS STATEMENT END#


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: TKeenan on November 13, 2014, 05:44:48 PM

The crime is against community.  The community is due an apology.  
A large section of "the community" regards Bitcoin Foundation and everything it stands for as reprehensible, so to characterise accusations against its leadership as a "crime against community" is beyond hyperbolic.  Many believe the very existence of BF to be a "crime against the Bitcoin community" and the organisation to be rotten to the core.

When a man beats a wife who happens to be reprehensible, it is no less of a crime.  The man still beat his wife.  Whether or not Murck and TBF are reprehensible does not mitigate the fact that Bruno is a fucking lunatic liar who falsely accuses others of pedophilia.  Saying you don't like the TBF doesn't reduce the bad acts of Bruno.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: BlindMayorBitcorn on November 13, 2014, 05:49:10 PM

The crime is against community.  The community is due an apology.  
A large section of "the community" regards Bitcoin Foundation and everything it stands for as reprehensible, so to characterise accusations against its leadership as a "crime against community" is beyond hyperbolic.  Many believe the very existence of BF to be a "crime against the Bitcoin community" and the organisation to be rotten to the core.

When a man beats a wife who happens to be reprehensible, it is no less of a crime.  The man still beat his wife.  Whether or not Murck and TBF are reprehensible does not mitigate the fact that Bruno is a fucking lunatic liar who falsely accuses others of pedophilia.  Saying you don't like the TBF doesn't reduce the bad acts of Bruno.

Very misleading analogy. Are you going to start the verbal abuse game again?


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: TKeenan on November 13, 2014, 06:01:18 PM

I'm doing it now, ironically started on it prior to reading your post. It should be done within a couple hours, then sent to him.
Any update on that Bruno?  WTF?



Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: fryarminer on November 13, 2014, 06:10:02 PM
My previous comment stands firm and true. However I must state that reading this thread is extremely entertaining!


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: TKeenan on November 13, 2014, 10:54:19 PM
Uh - Oh!  Nothing but silence from Bruno all day.  I think the process servers arrived with some nasty paper with the word: 'Summons' on top.  We may have heard the last of that guy.  Good riddance.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: QuestionAuthority on November 14, 2014, 08:10:30 AM
Does Bitcointalk have a script writer that comes up with this shit? This is the most foolish and at the same time entertaining thread I've witnessed here yet.

OP, you are either Patrick Murck, you're sleeping with him or you're a very clever and talented troll. I can't believe that Patrick Murck would come to this forum to masturbate like this so you're not him (and that's what this is too - public masturbation). That leaves either an overprotective lover or a clever troll. Which one are you?


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: KingOfTrolls on November 14, 2014, 09:59:56 AM
Does Bitcointalk have a script writer that comes up with this shit? This is the most foolish and at the same time entertaining thread I've witnessed here yet.

OP, you are either Patrick Murck, you're sleeping with him or you're a very clever and talented troll. I can't believe that Patrick Murck would come to this forum to masturbate like this so you're not him (and that's what this is too - public masturbation). That leaves either an overprotective lover or a clever troll. Which one are you?

You have forgotten a fourth option: Paid services.

It is possible that TKeenan is paid by Patrick... ::)


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: ibminer on November 14, 2014, 11:29:50 AM
This thread is entertaining, concerning, and scary. Is it safe to assume TKeenan is a close relative to Patrick Murck or just someone who wants to join TBF?    I hope not the latter....

I recently believed I had caught Bruno spreading FUD, in which he realized I was right and apologized for his mistake and forgetfulness. However, those posts ended up deleted by mods. Oddly I had never had any posts deleted on this forum before then so it was a bit surprising to me.

Bruno, I sincerely hope you actually have the evidence you speak of and have turned it over to the proper authorities. If you were throwing FUD out to try and get a point across, you need to man up, admit it and apologize. It is definitely not cool to accuse someone of being a pedo with nothing to back it up... but I have to believe you know that.

By the way, who is this Patrick Murck again?  Never heard of him.  ;)
If anyone was worried, Bitcoin will do fine with or without TBF.   8)


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: QuestionAuthority on November 14, 2014, 05:11:42 PM
Does Bitcointalk have a script writer that comes up with this shit? This is the most foolish and at the same time entertaining thread I've witnessed here yet.

OP, you are either Patrick Murck, you're sleeping with him or you're a very clever and talented troll. I can't believe that Patrick Murck would come to this forum to masturbate like this so you're not him (and that's what this is too - public masturbation). That leaves either an overprotective lover or a clever troll. Which one are you?


You have forgotten a fourth option: Paid services.

It is possible that TKeenan is paid by Patrick... ::)

True, he could be a paid troll. That would make sense considering his use of the word "we" when asking for a retraction. The troll considers itself a part of it's master like a faithful dog.

I was thinking more along the lines of a lover/cum dump because the responses are too sharp and angry. Lovers will vehemently defend their partners even when the partner doesn't believe it's worth the fight. (We've all experienced this, out on the town and some asshole cracks wise and you choose to ignore it but SHE goes apeshit. Now you're beating the hell out of some asshole because she started it.) I'm leaning toward this being Murck's bitch.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: 5000Bitcoins on November 14, 2014, 05:32:28 PM
This is very serious stuff. I don't think his reputation will be intact even if the one saying this has already said it was lies.  :-\


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: TKeenan on November 14, 2014, 06:20:38 PM
I'm leaning toward this being Murck's bitch.

OP, you are either Patrick Murck, you're sleeping with him or you're a very clever and talented troll. Which one are you?
Luvah


Bruno, I sincerely hope you actually have the evidence you speak of and have turned it over to the proper authorities. If you were throwing FUD out to try and get a point across, you need to man up, admit it and apologize. It is definitely not cool to accuse someone of being a pedo with nothing to back it up... but I have to believe you know that.
No, you see what happened is Bruno said he'd bring the evidence.  Then, it turns out some dumb bitch in his family got depressed.  Bruno says this is because Murck has attacked his family.  So now Bruno decided he does not have to show the evidence.  This is Bruno's plan to get out of responsibility for what he did.  

At one point, he said there would be an apology.  But of course, that never developed.  Lesson learned: don't expect much from a guy who parades about in a pink tutu.  And when he shouts: "look a pedophile", check to see if he is actually pointing to a mirror.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: btcusury on November 14, 2014, 07:38:38 PM
Who is "we"?  Has Patrick asked for an apology and retraction?
The crime is against community.  The community is due an apology. 

When a man beats his wife, it is a crime against society.  Even if she forgives him and does not prosecute her civil claim, society still goes for a criminal conviction. 

That fat asshole didn't just screw Mr. Murck, he screws everyone.  Everyone who doesn't demand an apology accepts such behavior and further harms the community.  He should be held to account.  That is all.
Your absurdly-abstract collectivist notions are what make ideas like genocide possible.

'Desires harm to his family'?  Nope.  I never desired anything of the sort.  I just mentioned that is what Murck ought to do to him.
Thus you desire Murck to do that to him, to harm him AND his family. Your evasions are transparent.

Phin is a world class idiot and conspiracy theorist.  Which normally I don't give a fuck about.  But when a good hard working honest man is slandered so profoundly, I am going to splash a little mud back in that direction.  Everyone in this community should also push back when some out of control idiot starts behaving in a manner which upsets the good order.  We can't rely on the courts to do this function.  It is a self-policing environment.  But to defend such a shithead and his behavior is also the work of morons.  Continue as you like.
"The good order"? What exactly is that? You sound very fearful of uncertainty. I'm guessing you watch TV and vote republicrat and laugh at "conspiracy theorists". LOL.

Bruno, I sincerely hope you actually have the evidence you speak of and have turned it over to the proper authorities. If you were throwing FUD out to try and get a point across, you need to man up, admit it and apologize. It is definitely not cool to accuse someone of being a pedo with nothing to back it up... but I have to believe you know that.
No, you see what happened is Bruno said he'd bring the evidence.  Then, it turns out some dumb bitch in his family got depressed.  Bruno says this is because Murck has attacked his family.  So now Bruno decided he does not have to show the evidence.  This is Bruno's plan to get out of responsibility for what he did.
Phin, do you wish to specifically deny this? (We all just want the truth here, amidst the mud-slinging.)



Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: repentance on November 14, 2014, 09:09:14 PM
This is very serious stuff. I don't think his reputation will be intact even if the one saying this has already said it was lies.  :-\

Nah, Patrick's a lawyer.  If he thought his reputation was going to be damaged by this, you would have seen statements from him and BF saying that the claims are a malicious blackmail attempt by a whack-job.  If you're trying to maintain your own credibility and undermine someone else's, you use credible people to do it, not random forum posters with a flair for the hyperbolic.  If you're trying to lay the grounds for a defamation action, you also want to establish malice if you can't prove actual harm to your reputation.

Look at the reaction to Phin's claims.  If people were taking them seriously you would see very public demands that Patrick at least step down while those claims are investigated.  That hasn't happened, so at most people (myself included) have done a bit of Googling to see if they can find whatever it was which made Phin believe he had a smoking gun.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: TKeenan on November 15, 2014, 07:42:47 PM
No, you see what happened is Bruno said he'd bring the evidence.  Then, it turns out some dumb bitch in his family got depressed.  Bruno says this is because Murck has attacked his family.  So now Bruno decided he does not have to show the evidence.  This is Bruno's plan to get out of responsibility for what he did.
Phin, do you wish to specifically deny this? (We all just want the truth here, amidst the mud-slinging.)
Nope Phin ain't denying it.  He ain't denying nothing.  Which is good as admitting it.  The only good thing I can find in Phin is that at least he knows he is a damn kook.  But knowing one is a kook, doesn't impart upon him a right to slander the good name of others.  Punishment is still due.  Without remorse, punishment should be doubled.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: 5000Bitcoins on November 16, 2014, 02:16:02 AM
This is very serious stuff. I don't think his reputation will be intact even if the one saying this has already said it was lies.  :-\

Nah, Patrick's a lawyer.  If he thought his reputation was going to be damaged by this, you would have seen statements from him and BF saying that the claims are a malicious blackmail attempt by a whack-job.  If you're trying to maintain your own credibility and undermine someone else's, you use credible people to do it, not random forum posters with a flair for the hyperbolic.  If you're trying to lay the grounds for a defamation action, you also want to establish malice if you can't prove actual harm to your reputation.

Look at the reaction to Phin's claims.  If people were taking them seriously you would see very public demands that Patrick at least step down while those claims are investigated.  That hasn't happened, so at most people (myself included) have done a bit of Googling to see if they can find whatever it was which made Phin believe he had a smoking gun.

This is true. However sadly, not all people are rational, which is why I placed this comment!


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: BlindMayorBitcorn on November 16, 2014, 02:19:25 AM
Maybe the burden of proof should be on anyone involved in TBF. Pedos until proven not pedos, the lot of 'em ;D


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: TKeenan on November 16, 2014, 04:50:02 PM
Maybe the burden of proof should be on anyone involved in TBF. Pedos until proven not pedos, the lot of 'em ;D

At least Bruno only falsely accused one guy, you aim to indict everyone as a pedo?


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: QuestionAuthority on November 16, 2014, 06:03:35 PM
Maybe the burden of proof should be on anyone involved in TBF. Pedos until proven not pedos, the lot of 'em ;D

At least Bruno only falsely accused one guy, you aim to indict everyone as a pedo?

Yeah, that's it because I'm sure he was serious. I think this trollfest is dead. You can move on now.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: TKeenan on November 16, 2014, 10:39:23 PM
shot himself in the head.
This was suggested.  However, Bruno doesn't seem to take good advice. 


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: repentance on November 17, 2014, 12:23:42 AM
Punishment is still due.  Without remorse, punishment should be doubled.

So who gets to decide the punishment and under what authority?  Patrick?  You?  Someone "objective"?  theymos?

Apart from Phin publicly apologising, what is it that you want as a resolution here and from whom?  Based on past experience, a significant proportion of the board likely has Phin on ignore and an even larger proportion regards his statements with extreme skepticism (things we know for a fact bother Phin).

If you want theymos to ban Phin, then you need to take your arguments in favour of that to theymos.  

If you want the community to shun Phin, then I'd argue that for the most part they've been doing so for a long time.  We know that from the time when the extent to which people were ignored was visible and Phin's level of being ignored would go through the roof when he was on a crusading frenzy.  I doubt you'll find many people reading Phin's threads hoping to discover the truth about Bitcoin's latest drama - they're way too exhausting to read, too "theatrical" in nature, and full of too much tenuous "evidence" for that.

If you want Patrick to take action against Phin, then you need to talk to Patrick about that.

In a way, the ultimate punishment is the one Phin has brought upon himself - his credibility as a "crusader for truth" is already so damaged within this community that his claims against Patrick didn't gain any traction.  Phin wants to be viewed and acknowledged within this community as someone who has selflessly and tirelessly spent thousands of hours promoting Bitcoin and pursuing the truth.  That he he isn't perceived that way is almost entirely the result of his own behaviour rather than attempts by others to discredit him, and everything about the way he handled this situation has only served to further undermine whatever small remnants of credibility he might have retained up until now.  

Phin being Phin, that his attempt to blackmail Patrick was more likely to damage his own reputation than Patrick's is something he did not foresee (I'm convinced Phin has a script in his head about how these things are going to play out when he does them and is utterly unable to understand why they don't play out as expected).





Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: jbreher on November 17, 2014, 04:17:30 PM
Postulate to consider: TKeenen is another of Bruno's alts. Discuss.

(... well, someone needed to float the proposition.)


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: QuestionAuthority on November 17, 2014, 04:40:05 PM
Postulate to consider: TKeenen is another of Bruno's alts. Discuss.

(... well, someone needed to float the proposition.)

Now THAT would be funny. Struggling for years with his weigh, uncontrolled beard growth and penchant for wearing a tutu Bruno lashes out against himself in a frenzy of self loathing. ROFL


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: TKeenan on November 17, 2014, 05:52:37 PM
Punishment is still due.  Without remorse, punishment should be doubled.
So who gets to decide the punishment and under what authority?  Patrick?  You?  Someone "objective"?  theymos?
You decide.  I'll be happy with that.  
If you want theymos to ban Phin, then you need to take your arguments in favour of that to theymos.  
Ban is stupid.  I never support censorship.
(I'm convinced Phin has a script in his head about how these things are going to play out when he does them and is utterly unable to understand why they don't play out as expected).
He needs to shut himself up.  Gun to the head was one fair and reasonable option.  


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: btcusury on November 17, 2014, 06:09:11 PM
Postulate to consider: TKeenen is another of Bruno's alts. Discuss.

(... well, someone needed to float the proposition.)

What a crazy conspiracy theory! Good thinking! That would explain the extreme vitriol from TKeenan. Phin would be attempting to control the backlash (opposition) by posing as the other side and making it about extreme personal attacks (adding the "and your family" component) rather than balanced consideration of the known facts, so that others will not join or comment.

(It seems rather unlikely though...)


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: J. J. Phillips on November 17, 2014, 08:39:27 PM
A moderator deleted my post yesterday (though thanks to QuestionAuthority for quoting it on another thread so people can read it if they like).

I'll take the deletion as a message that I should treat others on this forum with a basic level of human dignity and respect. It's a shame that Bruno and his apologists are not held to the same standard. However, I'll take the fact that the rest of us are held to a higher standard as a compliment. Sorry the moderator had to spend time on that.

Plus, I've decided to reduce my morning intake of Vodka.

It's been suggested that people attacking Bruno are motivated by a desire to defend Murck. I have no particular opinion about Murck. I have a strong opinion about Bruno, for obvious reasons, and a strong opinion about those who defend him. Bruno's a hopeless case, but most people are smart enough not to take him seriously. He's clearly mentally ill. It is seriously a shame he won't seek help for it and I hope it's not too much of a burden on those around him. For those of you defending him, I hope you'll quietly reflect on it a bit and realize you're not helping Bruno, you're not helping Bitcoin, and you're just not helping.

About the TKeenan being Bruno, I thought about that too. In fact, I seriously considered "coming out" as Bruno myself. It would be easy because Bruno has some obvious "signature" writing patterns one can mimic. Plus it's not like Bruno is capable of making a PGP key to prevent someone from pretending to be him. But, eh, it wouldn't be fun enough to spend that much time on.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: chufchuf on November 17, 2014, 09:43:58 PM
Who is "we"?  Has Patrick asked for an apology and retraction?
The crime is against community.  The community is due an apology. 

When a man beats his wife, it is a crime against society.  Even if she forgives him and does not prosecute her civil claim, society still goes for a criminal conviction. 

That fat asshole didn't just screw Mr. Murck, he screws everyone.  Everyone who doesn't demand an apology accepts such behavior and further harms the community.  He should be held to account.  That is all.
Your absurdly-abstract collectivist notions are what make ideas like genocide possible.



I haven't read the rest of the thread and will only read this. And it's too pretentious because if you dispute what that guy just said, you're enabling scotsmen and their sheep shagging hobbies. I'm sure there's a lot of texan sheep shaggers here though, there usually is whenever something is about accumulating coins of some sort. It isn't ok to just go shagging goats and sheep and cows like that, and hurling goat turd infested dicks in prison is not genocide, if anything it's genocide of the half-breed goat-human species alex jones or rand paul belong to.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: BlindMayorBitcorn on November 17, 2014, 11:08:28 PM
Postulate to consider: TKeenen is another of Bruno's alts. Discuss.

(... well, someone needed to float the proposition.)

Haha. The he's an evil genius angle. Let's run with that one :D


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: fryarminer on November 18, 2014, 06:30:14 AM
Postulate to consider: TKeenen is another of Bruno's alts. Discuss.

(... well, someone needed to float the proposition.)

Just when I thought this thread was dead.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: btcusury on November 18, 2014, 07:59:07 PM
I haven't read the rest of the thread and will only read this. And it's too pretentious because if you dispute what that guy just said, you're enabling scotsmen and their sheep shagging hobbies. I'm sure there's a lot of texan sheep shaggers here though, there usually is whenever something is about accumulating coins of some sort. It isn't ok to just go shagging goats and sheep and cows like that, and hurling goat turd infested dicks in prison is not genocide, if anything it's genocide of the half-breed goat-human species alex jones or rand paul belong to.

Yeah, you make a valid point there.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: QuestionAuthority on November 19, 2014, 12:45:23 AM
I haven't read the rest of the thread and will only read this. And it's too pretentious because if you dispute what that guy just said, you're enabling scotsmen and their sheep shagging hobbies. I'm sure there's a lot of texan sheep shaggers here though, there usually is whenever something is about accumulating coins of some sort. It isn't ok to just go shagging goats and sheep and cows like that, and hurling goat turd infested dicks in prison is not genocide, if anything it's genocide of the half-breed goat-human species alex jones or rand paul belong to.

Yeah, you make a valid point there.

You understood that? What the fuck is he talking about?


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: BlindMayorBitcorn on November 19, 2014, 12:53:41 AM
I haven't read the rest of the thread and will only read this. And it's too pretentious because if you dispute what that guy just said, you're enabling scotsmen and their sheep shagging hobbies. I'm sure there's a lot of texan sheep shaggers here though, there usually is whenever something is about accumulating coins of some sort. It isn't ok to just go shagging goats and sheep and cows like that, and hurling goat turd infested dicks in prison is not genocide, if anything it's genocide of the half-breed goat-human species alex jones or rand paul belong to.

Yeah, you make a valid point there.

You understood that? What the fuck is he talking about?

That must have been sarcasm ;) I considered it myself, but necrobumping this thread comes at a cost of increasing the general level of insanity beyond even half-breed goat-people?


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: QuestionAuthority on November 19, 2014, 01:07:58 AM
I haven't read the rest of the thread and will only read this. And it's too pretentious because if you dispute what that guy just said, you're enabling scotsmen and their sheep shagging hobbies. I'm sure there's a lot of texan sheep shaggers here though, there usually is whenever something is about accumulating coins of some sort. It isn't ok to just go shagging goats and sheep and cows like that, and hurling goat turd infested dicks in prison is not genocide, if anything it's genocide of the half-breed goat-human species alex jones or rand paul belong to.

Yeah, you make a valid point there.

You understood that? What the fuck is he talking about?

That must have been sarcasm ;) I considered it myself, but necrobumping this thread comes at a cost of increasing the general level of insanity beyond even half-breed goat-people?

Oh, good. I thought I wasn't one of the cool kids anymore and there was some sort of message I didn't get. I don't mind bumping this because I would like Bruno to say something about his pedo accusation. He shouldn't run around calling people names for no reason like this forum is a 6th grade schoolyard. I'd be happy if he simply said the whole thing was bullshit just for fun.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: BlindMayorBitcorn on November 19, 2014, 01:15:16 AM
"Hurling goat turd infested dicks in prison is not genocide."


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: TheTribesman on November 19, 2014, 11:36:16 AM
"Hurling goat turd infested dicks in prison is not genocide."
Yes, hurling and dicks is an explosive mix in prison
http://sportsnewsireland.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/minor-hurling-610x400.jpg
(for the uninitiated, hurling is also an Irish sport)


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: J. J. Phillips on November 19, 2014, 07:53:39 PM
I don't mind bumping this because I would like Bruno to say something about his pedo accusation. He shouldn't run around calling people names for no reason like this forum is a 6th grade schoolyard. I'd be happy if he simply said the whole thing was bullshit just for fun.

Well, I've just been bullshitting for fun, so I assume you're happy with me too. Good to know.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: QuestionAuthority on November 19, 2014, 08:08:09 PM
I don't mind bumping this because I would like Bruno to say something about his pedo accusation. He shouldn't run around calling people names for no reason like this forum is a 6th grade schoolyard. I'd be happy if he simply said the whole thing was bullshit just for fun.

Well, I've just been bullshitting for fun, so I assume you're happy with me too. Good to know.

Most of the threads on this forum are just bullshitting now. I think bored people screwing around describes about 3/4 of the Bitcoin user base.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: 2dogs on November 19, 2014, 08:28:55 PM
I don't mind bumping this because I would like Bruno to say something about his pedo accusation. He shouldn't run around calling people names for no reason like this forum is a 6th grade schoolyard. I'd be happy if he simply said the whole thing was bullshit just for fun.

Well, I've just been bullshitting for fun, so I assume you're happy with me too. Good to know.

Most of the threads on this forum are just bullshitting now. I think bored people screwing around describes about 3/4 of the Bitcoin user base.

Exactly right.

Some of us understand the saying:  "Don't believe everything you hear and half of what you read", especially on the internet.

I would like to know what OP thinks of all the scammers who stole real money from members on this forum?
If OP wants to play judge and jury, why isn't OP screaming for justice - for those victims?


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: hdbuck on November 19, 2014, 11:01:08 PM
I don't mind bumping this because I would like Bruno to say something about his pedo accusation. He shouldn't run around calling people names for no reason like this forum is a 6th grade schoolyard. I'd be happy if he simply said the whole thing was bullshit just for fun.

Well, I've just been bullshitting for fun, so I assume you're happy with me too. Good to know.

Most of the threads on this forum are just bullshitting now. I think bored people screwing around describes about 3/4 of the Bitcoin user base.

Exactly right.

Some of us understand the saying:  "Don't believe everything you hear and half of what you read", especially on the internet.

I would like to know what OP thinks of all the scammers who stole real money from members on this forum?
If OP wants to play judge and jury, why isn't OP screaming for justice - for those victims?

meh so what? gogo TBF?! ;D

edit: OP is bruno. i figured its just a way to keep those accusations thriving.


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: JPage on November 19, 2014, 11:33:27 PM
I don't mind bumping this because I would like Bruno to say something about his pedo accusation. He shouldn't run around calling people names for no reason like this forum is a 6th grade schoolyard. I'd be happy if he simply said the whole thing was bullshit just for fun.

Well, I've just been bullshitting for fun, so I assume you're happy with me too. Good to know.

Most of the threads on this forum are just bullshitting now. I think bored people screwing around describes about 3/4 of the Bitcoin user base.

Exactly right.

Some of us understand the saying:  "Don't believe everything you hear and half of what you read", especially on the internet.

I would like to know what OP thinks of all the scammers who stole real money from members on this forum?
If OP wants to play judge and jury, why isn't OP screaming for justice - for those victims?
You mean like KnC?


Title: Re: Patrick Murck of The Bitcoin Foundation - attacked by a lunatic.
Post by: hdbuck on November 19, 2014, 11:35:49 PM
I don't mind bumping this because I would like Bruno to say something about his pedo accusation. He shouldn't run around calling people names for no reason like this forum is a 6th grade schoolyard. I'd be happy if he simply said the whole thing was bullshit just for fun.

Well, I've just been bullshitting for fun, so I assume you're happy with me too. Good to know.

Most of the threads on this forum are just bullshitting now. I think bored people screwing around describes about 3/4 of the Bitcoin user base.

Exactly right.

Some of us understand the saying:  "Don't believe everything you hear and half of what you read", especially on the internet.

I would like to know what OP thinks of all the scammers who stole real money from members on this forum?
If OP wants to play judge and jury, why isn't OP screaming for justice - for those victims?
You mean like KnC?

Mt Gox?