Bitcoin Forum

Hello, could somebody please share the hashrate for amd ryzen processor? Thanks

Im curious on this on for cryptonight.

Doesn't really matter. CPU mining will never be as profitable. Whatever hashrate new Ryzen processors are getting they will never hit ROI so there is no point in buying them with mining in mind, and if you want to mine from time to time there is no profit (just a few bucks)

lol.....this is biggest bulshit i ahve ever heard :D

okay if you are so smart (not really but...) chose  any CPU, any algorithm and calculate ROI time. You will see what actual hashrate are CPUs getting. Before you write something stupid please do some research beforehand you dumb fuck.

are you serious? do some research, it is true that cpu has lower roi but they will hit it... When zec was out the first 2 weeks were great for cpu miners + ryzen should have greater performance and consumption, I need some cpu to my rig, why not buy on which can earn me money?

If you are right why are everyone using GPU over CPU now ? Difficulty is constantly increasing and with low CPU hashrate you will eventually be in a loss. Ryzen cannot earn you money. For that 350$ (1700) you can get almost RX 470 and for a few more bucks you can get another one. CPU mining is just a nonsense. I asked you something last time. Chose cpu and algo and please let us all know what is ROI time and then compare invested money with some GPU in same price range and then tell me CPU mining is any profitable.

Op didn't ask if it was profitable or not he asked the hashrate.

It its always possible to ROI if you have cheap electricity. Sure you cant compare a gpu with cpu but still highend cpu's can farm good specially at new coins with low diff.

Considering the Ryzen chips dont even come out for 2 more days I doubt you will find an answer right now.

nah, you can already buy them at least in my country - http://imgur.com/a/lobM2

Those must be preorders, or else more benchmarks would be posted besides a couple of low quality leaked screenshots and AMD sourced numbers.

If you needed a new CPU anyway, the 1700 might be good for monero. My 6800k does 350h/s, and the 1700 should do ~475 at a lower TDP.
But unless we have another Zcash situation where CPU is competitive with GPU in the beginning, it's a worse investment than a GPU. Not saying you won't ROI, but it's comparatively worse.

first of all you did not ask him but you asked me ... second : on cryptonight the cpu has more profitability than gpu , and there are still some coin mineable only by cpu. the problem with cpu is that for each cpu u need a motherboard and so on , making them very expensive for mining , but if you consider that for each cpu u can pair 6 gpus.... then you are gonna roi pretty fast...


just fyi : at the moment 2 opteron cpus are capable of pulling 900 h/s at less than 100w in monero. such cpu combo will cost around 150 Eur (like a graphic card) problem is that you can
stack up to 4 cpus in an opteron motherboard... and 4cpus mobo are blody expensive....

so CPU WILL HIT ROI , and CPU ARE , ACTUALLY , MORE PROFITABLE THAN GPU , they will just roi slower due to the bond , usually 1 cpu - 1 motherboard.
imagine make 1 rig and for each rig use only 1 videocard.....



here is 6 , SIX, stupid examples of coins that used to bring me not only roi with a cpu but also some serious profit (from oldest to newest )

1 ) BITCOIN (in 2009 was cpu minable only)
2 ) XPM
3 ) XMR
4 ) XMG
5 ) ZCASH
6 ) PASCAL

and this just coz i aint mined zcoin ........


not to mention  that MAGI (XMG ) is still cpu only , and there are more coins cpu only.... but better not to open the eyes to ignorant.... better leave them in the darkness...

just fyi : at the moment 2 opteron cpus are capable of pulling 900 h/s at less than 100w in monero. such cpu combo will cost around 150 Eur (like a graphic card) problem is that you can
stack up to 4 cpus in an opteron motherboard... and 4cpus mobo are blody expensive....

so CPU WILL HIT ROI , and CPU ARE , ACTUALLY , MORE PROFITABLE THAN GPU , they will just roi slower due to the bond , usually 1 cpu - 1 motherboard.
imagine make 1 rig and for each rig use only 1 videocard.....


[/quote]

do you have more info about it please? is it opteron 6276? I think it can be possible to get motherboard for 2 cpu, but it will need at least 3 pcie slots for gpu... do you know what is the best combination of mobo+cpu

yup those boards do cost a long time ago i had one that took two cpu the board cost me if remember right 300 bucks and that was a few years ago they are way more now ..

mobo - http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Supermicro-H8DGi-F-Dual-Opteron-AMD-Slots-SR5690-Extended-ATX-Motherboard-/391677047878?hash=item5b31c57446:g:4tkAAOSwjDZYelPN
2x cpu - http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/AMD-Opteron-6276-16-Core-CPU-Processors-2-3GHz-16MB-OS6276WKTGGGU-/282358551444?hash=item41bde19394:g:8bsAAOSwCU1YoHfy
6x gpu

will it work?  ;D

yeah that will do.

CPU's often have first dibs on new coins before good GPU miners are made. Getting early mining on a coin before it reaches top 100 is indeed profitable.

Two E5-2667 V3 ES 8 core cpu's running Wolfs GPU XMR miner average ~1150 H/s .

[19:26:35] New job at diff 100002
[19:26:35] Thread 2, (CPU): 35.40H/s
[19:26:35] Thread 20, (CPU): 37.13H/s
[19:26:35] Thread 33, (CPU): 34.98H/s
[19:26:35] Thread 28, (CPU): 35.34H/s
[19:26:35] Thread 11, (CPU): 35.95H/s
[19:26:35] Thread 4, (CPU): 36.18H/s
[19:26:35] Thread 31, (CPU): 38.17H/s
[19:26:35] Thread 25, (CPU): 36.45H/s
[19:26:35] Thread 21, (CPU): 36.10H/s
[19:26:35] Thread 26, (CPU): 35.24H/s
[19:26:35] Thread 23, (CPU): 35.04H/s
[19:26:35] Thread 17, (CPU): 35.13H/s
[19:26:35] Thread 19, (CPU): 35.69H/s
[19:26:35] Thread 22, (CPU): 34.83H/s
[19:26:35] Thread 9, (CPU): 36.44H/s
[19:26:35] Thread 5, (CPU): 35.91H/s
[19:26:35] Thread 15, (CPU): 35.49H/s
[19:26:35] Thread 18, (CPU): 35.82H/s
[19:26:35] Thread 24, (CPU): 35.23H/s
[19:26:35] Thread 30, (CPU): 34.75H/s
[19:26:35] Thread 10, (CPU): 35.69H/s
[19:26:35] Thread 8, (CPU): 36.04H/s
[19:26:35] Thread 32, (CPU): 35.52H/s
[19:26:35] Thread 12, (CPU): 34.56H/s
[19:26:35] Thread 29, (CPU): 35.68H/s
[19:26:35] Thread 27, (CPU): 37.30H/s
[19:26:35] Thread 7, (CPU): 35.57H/s
[19:26:35] Thread 13, (CPU): 35.18H/s
[19:26:35] Thread 16, (CPU): 35.43H/s
[19:26:35] Thread 6, (CPU): 34.81H/s
[19:26:35] Thread 3, (CPU): 33.71H/s
[19:26:35] Thread 14, (CPU): 37.04H/s


Yes cpu's can be viable.

EDIT: Added this from the Serve The Home forum Monero performance post.

"CPU Results (wolf's) Using (MB L3 cache/ 2) for threads
4x Intel Xeon E7-8870 V3 = 2600H/s (NB drops to 2000 over time)
2x Intel Xeon E5-2699 V4 = 1723H/s
1x Intel Xeon Phi 7210 = 602H/s (case to use nproc-1)
2x Intel Xeon E5-2698 V4 = 1572H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2698 V3 = 1463H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2690 V3 = 1100H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2667 V3 = 1090H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2658 V3 = 1050H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2650 V4 = 1047H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2650L V4 = 1031H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2683 V3 = 1014H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2680 V3 = 969H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2670 V3 = 969H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2628L V4 = 897H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2650L V3 = 874H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2630 V4 = 866H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2670 V1 = 829H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2650 V1 = 750H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2620 V1 = 480H/s
1x Intel Xeon D-1587 = 388H/s
1x Intel Xeon E5-2630L V3 = 334H/s
1x Intel Xeon D-1541 = 242H/s
1x Intel Xeon E3-1515M V5 = 240H/s
1x Intel Xeon D-1540 = 218H/s
1x Intel Xeon E3-1220 V3 = 186H/s (case to use either nproc/2 or nproc-1)
1x Intel Xeon E3-1245 V5 = 161H/s
1x Special CPU = 153H/s (case to use nproc)
1x Intel Atom C3338 = 77H/s (case to use nproc)
1x Intel Pentium D1508 = 47H/s (case to use nproc-1)
1x Intel Atom C2358 = 18H/s (use nproc)


ARM CPU Results (thanks Fractal)
ARM Cortex A7 (Odroid-C1) 5.9H/s (no AES)
ARM Cortex A53 (Odroid-C2) 7.2 H/s (no AES)
ARM Cortex A53 (Pine64) 12.5 H/s @ 4.1W (using AES instructions, thermal limited) 3H/W

GPU Results (ccminer)
1/4x GRID M40 GPU = 220H/s
1x GRID M40 GPU = 880H/s
1x NVIDIA GTX 1070 (ASUS STRIX) = 475H/s
1x NVIDIA GTX 1060 6GB (ASUS dual fan) = 431H/s
1x NVIDIA GTX 1060 6GB (EVGA ACX single fan) = 432H/s
1x NVIDIA GTX 1050 Ti 4GB (PNY) = 297H/s
1x NVIDIA GTX 970 (ASUS STRIX) = 375H/s
1x NVIDIA GTX 750 Ti = 205 H/s (Fractal)
1x NVIDIA GRID K520 (AWS g2.2xlarge) = 164H/s
1x NVIDIA K80 (one of two GPUs AWS p2.xlarge) = 209H/s"

thanks for sharing it but aren't the opteron cpu better in price/hasharate

Yea but they are power hungry.

But you can buy a new socket G34 4 cpu motherboard for under $80.00 of course you would have to deal with non standard format and non standard power connectivity and every time I thought of it I quickly talked myself out of it.

The more standard boards are more expensive to the point its not worth it.

It's worth doing if you could get a deal on a decommissioned server for cheap.

But you can purchase a dual node dual cpu open compute socket 2011 Wiwynn server new in the box for under $200.00

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Wiwynn-SV7210-Two-Node-Open-Compute-Server-Dual-LGA-2011-/391296440423 (http://www.ebay.com/itm/Wiwynn-SV7210-Two-Node-Open-Compute-Server-Dual-LGA-2011-/391296440423)

All you need to do is buy 4 cheap E5-2600 V1 cpu's and some cheap ddr 3 ram and a SSD and 240 volt power source, will run Linux and windows 7 just fine.

The only reason I have have not bought several is I moving away from socket 2011 and moving to socket 2011-3.


EDIT: Every time I look at those open compute servers I am SO tempted........I must not buy.........must not........will power must have will power.....LOL

Interesting

I am curious about using this to mine XMR and switch to new alts for early dibs on the mining

Given it hasn't even been released yet (later this week), how are we going to share hashrates?

1x AMD R9 290 = 870 H/ TDP 300
1x AMD RX 480 = 700 H/ TDP 150
1x AMD R9 470 = 650 H/ TDP 130
1x AMD R9 280x = 600 H/ TDP 250
1x AMD R9 280 = 550 H/ TDP 250

CPU mining it's worthless, as always ;)

Better to scale up with GPUs (7/8 per system) than with CPUs (up to 2 in very costly, and power hungry, configs). If you max out CPUs you loose hashrate on the GPUs, that's why CPU mining it's ridicolous compared to GPU; if you're using a botnet then good for you, but we're not talking about legit operations, not hacking others

My AMD FX8320E gives 320 H/S for Cryptonight with six threads while I'm able to mine other coins with my GPUs consuming 65W extra. While GPUs are much better, Ryzen may be able to close the gap. At least to an extent with Cryptonight.

This is relevant to those who are making dedicate mining rigs

Some people may be building a new PC anyway and would like to put their CPU to work when not in use. Far as just trying to cram a mining CPU into a regular GPU mining rig we got awhile before we see any ideal AM4 based motherboards for mining rigs

XMR aside, there are rising new altcoins that are open game for CPU's. You may want to keep mentioning that CPU mining is inferior but for the rest of us who care to utilize the CPU please let us speculate and archive any hash rate reports we can find in here or whatever new thread when Ryzen is actually out. I'd really just like a clean thread of just Ryzen hashrates without this GPU vs. CPU debate cluttering the first page and beyond

Hi Povertybyte

Sure, my intention wasn't to bash, just to report a conclusion that could help others in this sector, while considering to invest heavily, or not, in State-Of-The-Art CPUs.

With this goal surely the CPU, given it's name "Central Processing Unit", it's fundamental, but just for mining purposes unfortunately not.

I am pretty sure that the Ryzen architecture could bring benefits, but I see that the multi-threading implementation for these architectures needs a lot of phisical and logical cores, so it could be interesting surely for the server derivations with higher TDPs and raw power. From what I've seen RYZEN seems just a stop-gap measure in opposition to the Intel dominance, because of an i7 7700K has the edge on a lof of applications, due the single thread performance.

What could really move something could be the new Intel 7950x with 24 threads, potentially, not a 95W TDP RYZEN.

The main issue is the fact that when we'll have that, there will be VOLTA refresh and the successor of VEGA.

THEYRE HERE!

someone show us benchmarks

a friend of mine received his today but the mobo isnt there yet, if no one else chimes in till that is the case i can provide numbers for the 1700 stock and with max OC

I'll be watching :)....I'm still gonna  hold off for the cheaper ones all most bought one of the low end ones released to day on New egg but still gonna wait after my FX 8 core buys a few years back on day one .. I'll let others test them this time ...

for anyone interested  the AMD RYZEN 7 1800X 8-Core 3.6 GHz (4.0 GHz Turbo) Socket AM4 95W YD180XBCAEWOF Desktop Processor sold out fast eta on restock 10 th of March, they still have the other two in stock..

you might find more on Amazon but they cost more then new egg I run a app on firefox that prices Amazon on new egg .

It's not worthless, cpu mining is complementary. ;)


 



 

65W extra for 320H is very efficient. It is better than RX 480.

Little bird told me Ryzen R7 1800x  1390h/s mining XMR

From the awesome Servethehome forums (https://forums.servethehome.com/index.php?threads/monero-mining-performance.12116/)
I'm guessing these numbers will improve as they get optimized miners from the devs.

CPU Results (wolf's) Using (MB L3 cache/ 2) for threads
4x Intel Xeon E7-8870 V3 = 2600H/s (NB drops to 2000 over time)
2x Intel Xeon E5-2699 V4 = 1723H/s
1x Intel Xeon Phi 7210 = 602H/s (case to use nproc-1)
2x Intel Xeon E5-2698 V4 = 1572H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2698 V3 = 1463H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2690 V3 = 1100H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2667 V3 = 1090H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2658 V3 = 1050H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2650 V4 = 1047H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2650L V4 = 1031H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2683 V3 = 1014H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2680 V3 = 969H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2670 V3 = 969H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2628L V4 = 897H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2650L V3 = 874H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2630 V4 = 866H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2670 V1 = 829H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2650 V1 = 750H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2620 V1 = 480H/s
1x Intel Xeon D-1587 = 388H/s
1x Intel Xeon E5-2630L V3 = 334H/s
1x AMD Ryzen 7 1700X = 273H/s
1x AMD Ryzen 7 1700 = 250H/s (209 using nproc)
1x Intel Xeon D-1541 = 242H/s
1x Intel Xeon E3-1515M V5 = 240H/s
1x Intel Xeon D-1540 = 218H/s
1x Intel Xeon E3-1220 V3 = 186H/s (case to use either nproc/2 or nproc-1)
1x Intel Xeon E3-1245 V5 = 161H/s
1x Special CPU = 153H/s (case to use nproc)
1x Intel Atom C3338 = 77H/s (case to use nproc)
1x Intel Pentium D1508 = 47H/s (case to use nproc-1)
1x Intel Atom C2358 = 18H/s (use nproc)

Unfortunately the reviews are stating the TDP figures are pure fiction for Ryzen.  So I wouldn't use those TDP numbers to figure efficiency. 

Quoted from the Serve The Home forum:

"It's definitely not a perfect formula, but the cryptonight algorith requires 2MB of memory per thread to calculate hashes. Keeping it all in L3 cache or below definitely sped it up on the platforms I've tested.

For example:

Intel Xeon E3-1240 v1 went from 129 H/s to 231 H/s (going from 7 to 4 threads, respectively). L3 cache size is 8MB."

This is the most important thing with cpu mining cryptonight, with both my E5's combined I have 70 mb of L3 so 70/2 = 35 so I can run all 32 threads and get the best performance, with my older pair of E5 2670's with a total of 40mb of L3 for both it seemed to run best with ~18 threads and any more the hash rate would drop.

Also you compare my ES 2667 V3's to the retail ones in the above list my has rate is a about 50-60 H/s faster even tho mine only boost up to 3.0 Ghz and the retail version boost up to I think 3.6 Ghz. The thing to think about is that the retail 2667's have 20mb of L3 vs 35mb of L3 with my ES cpu's.
 

That explains why my own CPU does not get more hashing past a certain point. I suppose the Ryzen CPU's are fairly efficient power wise for CPU mining but it would have been nice if they could simply produce double the hash rates they got right now.

I wonder now if disabling hyperthreading can be done to actually cram all its power into 8 threads. I could probably try that with my old i7

I thought about trying that with my older dual 2670 build, but that parts are back in their boxes because I wanted to put them up on ebay. 

 Better example - NVidia 750 Ti - 250 H/s or a bit more if pushed for around 50 watts actual usage - which is the same ballpark as most CPUs are in any more, is easily a match for those Ryzen results at a bit LOWER power despite being generation-older tech and quite a bit less power usage than the high-end stuff usually used for CPU mining, as well as being quite a bit less $$$ than any of the CPUs listed in the post I didn't quote that can compete with it on hashrate.

No it won't. The algo is cache bound, it has nothing to do with compute power. Once the cache overflows performance goes
down. Optimum thread count is cache size MB / 2 MB. No CPU can mine cryptonight efficiently with max threads, hyper or not.

Only ? i aspected more from ryzen , i think is not optimized...

I would also expect that the numbers will get a lot better if there is optimization for this new CPU.  Just like when new coin or new GPU is launched the first miners generally run pretty poorly.

Big update on Ryzen:

"Which was keeping the thread count too low. Updated the Ryzen 7 1800X numbers and now getting over 500H/s. "

 https://forums.servethehome.com/index.php?threads/monero-mining-performance.12116/ (https://forums.servethehome.com/index.php?threads/monero-mining-performance.12116/)

Read page 16 for info.

He has not retested 1700 or 1700x yet.

"CPU Results (wolf's) Using (MB L3 cache/ 2) for threads
4x Intel Xeon E7-8870 V3 = 2600H/s (NB drops to 2000 over time)
2x Intel Xeon E5-2699 V4 = 1723H/s
1x Intel Xeon Phi 7210 = 602H/s (case to use nproc-1)
2x Intel Xeon E5-2698 V4 = 1572H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2698 V3 = 1463H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2690 V3 = 1100H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2667 V3 = 1090H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2658 V3 = 1050H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2650 V4 = 1047H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2650L V4 = 1031H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2683 V3 = 1014H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2680 V3 = 969H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2670 V3 = 969H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2628L V4 = 897H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2650L V3 = 874H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2630 V4 = 866H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2670 V1 = 829H/s
2x Intel Xeon E5-2650 V1 = 750H/s
1x AMD Ryzen 7 1800X = 537H/s (note have custom Monero Ryzen image)
2x Intel Xeon E5-2620 V1 = 480H/s
1x Intel Xeon D-1587 = 388H/s
1x Intel Xeon E5-2630L V3 = 334H/s
1x AMD Ryzen 7 1700X = 273H/s
1x AMD Ryzen 7 1700 = 250H/s (209 using nproc)
1x Intel Xeon D-1541 = 242H/s
1x Intel Xeon E3-1515M V5 = 240H/s
1x Intel Xeon D-1540 = 218H/s
1x Intel Xeon E3-1220 V3 = 186H/s (case to use either nproc/2 or nproc-1)
1x Intel Xeon E3-1245 V5 = 161H/s
1x Special CPU = 153H/s (case to use nproc)
1x Intel Atom C3338 = 77H/s (case to use nproc)
1x Intel Pentium D1508 = 47H/s (case to use nproc-1)
1x Intel Atom C2358 = 18H/s (use nproc)"

Nice increase with testing to find the sweet spot with the number of threads.

EDIT: Also to add the cpu was using 133 watts, not bad at all.  

But still behind Xeon ES's as for price/performance.

I can't wait until Naples is released.

Now those numbers are starting to look more realistic.  Thanks for the update.  I am sure there will be quite a few lessons learned and updates since this CPU is new to the market.  I now hear rumblings coming from Intel about more cores... Gosh, so all it takes is a little competition to get some progress and better prices??? Who knew right? 

I think I will give a Ryzen CPU a shot.  It has been a long time since I owned an AMD.  I won't be buying it for mining specifically, but I will test it and see if I can multitask it when the machine isn't busy doing other things.   ;D  It will be nice to have an AMD in the house again.  Always rooting for the underdog!

133 watt with nominal tdp 95 watt , i read ryzen have a bug in all firmware bios motherboard . Anyone know this issue ? . Ryzen is a GREAT cpu , but all motherboard product is not good at moment .

LOL, well neither AMD or Intel have a good track record of sticking to the TDP figures.  For example look at the AMD TDP figures for the RX480 and RX470 GPU's.  Those figures are wishful thinking with the stock ROM's.  So I would venture to say the Ryzen CPU tdp figures are largely marketing at this point.  So far all the reviews I have read have shown much higher consumption rates than the published TDP.

You are right about the mobo's they are pretty iffy right now.  I heard this morning that the latest microcode was only finalized a few weeks ago so this is going to be a "work in progress" for a while.

there are issues with (multiple) high clocked ram sticks installed, a friend of mine will try to get 3200mhz working, might have a great impact on cryptonight performance, sadly still no mobo arrived

In review i read , ryzen 1700 clock at 4ghz is the same identical result with 1700x 4ghz and 1800x 4ghz , why in the table:

1x AMD Ryzen 7 1800x = 537H / s (nota avere su immagine Monero Ryzen)

1x AMD Ryzen 7 1700X = 273H / s
1x AMD Ryzen 7 1700 = 250h / s (209 utilizzando nproc)

Its not possible .

Did you read the link I gave?

At first he was getting a "modest" improvement ( the first result is no longer in the list since he updated it with the new info but if I remember correctly it was ~305 H/s) over the 1700's but after he played around with the thread count in Wolfs miner he saw a large improvement so he updated the list for the 1800x, he did not update the 1700's yet.

Output of lscpu on Ryzen:
"Architecture:          x86_64
CPU op-mode(s):        32-bit, 64-bit
Byte Order:            Little Endian
CPU(s):                16
On-line CPU(s) list:   0-15
Thread(s) per core:    2
Core(s) per socket:    8
Socket(s):             1
NUMA node(s):          1
Vendor ID:             AuthenticAMD
CPU family:            23
Model:                 1
Stepping:              1
CPU MHz:               3600.000
BogoMIPS:              7180.28
Virtualization:        AMD-V
L1d cache:             32K
L1i cache:             64K
L2 cache:              512K
L3 cache:              8192K
NUMA node0 CPU(s):     0-15"

He was using the output of lscpu and it was not listing L3 cache correctly, Ryzen has TWO 8MB L3 Caches, for a total of 16 mb of L3 and he was using only 4 threads instead of 8 so the performance was crap.

Cryptonite is very sensitive with the number of threads you let it use, not enough or too many the performance is worse. The algorithm uses two mb per thread so if you give it too many cores where it's swapped to ram it slows down or if you give it less than the optimum amount it is not using all of the resources in the cache optimally so it is not running as many threads it can for best performance.

From the link:

"Added AMD Ryzen 1800X Monero mining benchmarks to the first post. Modest improvement over the 1700X. "

And:

"Uh, if you were only using 4 threads that's your problem. and why it performs at half what i expected...

Ryzen has 4 MB L2 and 16MB l3. it is 8MB L3 per cluster complex and there are 2 clusters. Not 8MB total.

You should definitely retest at 8 and 10 threads. and what the hell test some others too because you never know... "

And:

"I did not get as good of results with 10 and 16 was extremely poor."






Ryzen uses two 8 mb L3 cache's not a single 16mb, so if data is transfered from 8mb L3 to 8mb L3 it hurts performance vs a single 16 mb L3 cache.

So it looks like testing and running the optimum number of threads is critical for performance for CPU's especially Ryzen, also until things are optimized for Ryzen it could be hit or miss with the performance of mining programs.

I do know there will be improvements to the microcode and motherboard bios's also software will need some optimizations, but all that means that the performance will only get better and that is usually what happens when a new cpu is released.
 
 

Ryzen on cynebench :

http://livedoor.blogimg.jp/wavefanc/imgs/d/b/dbaebaf4.png

.

At 500h/s that is good enough to go with a R7 1700 and a sub $120 mobo that supports 6 gpus imo. Better hashing density, slow depreciation and easy to resell mobo, socket valid for 4 years, able to CPU mine new coins like zcash when it launched. I would underclock and undervolt for better hash/watt.

Anyone try cpuminer-opt-3.5.3-windows with zcoin on ryzen ? This is :

i7 5820k @ 4.3 ghz :

https://s10.postimg.org/433p9r7yx/photo_2017_03_05_21_12_39.jpg

i7 7700k @ 5ghz :

https://s22.postimg.org/tt5edgrg1/traidminer_7700_K_5000.jpg

And i5 6600 @ default :

https://s13.postimg.org/3xeye51jr/i5_6600.jpg

.

I have a couple of suggestions for testing. Cryptonight is a good test for cache performance but
doesn't stress the CPU in any way. Ryzen (16 MB cache) is equivalent to 2x i7-6700K (8 MB cache each).
Very competitive in cache performance.

Testing raw compute performance is better done with the deep algo. It makes generous use of AES,
AVX and AVX2 while not being bogged down by memory accesses. It's a good test of Ryzen's AVX/2
and hyperthreading performance.

Lyra2z330 (zoin) is a good test for a memory hard algo. It's extreme memory requirements blow away
the cache and make it irrelevent. This tests the memory interface but is also dependetn on the memory itself.
Ryzen went with a 2 channel controller so will be at a disadvantage over Intel E series 4 channel controller.

Lyra2rev2 has a good mix of compute intensive and memory intensive functions.

It's good to monitor CPU Usage while testing. As seen with cryptonight a memory or cache bottleneck means
the CPU spends a lot of time idle. The CPU needs to be able to hit 100% to show its full compute potential.

Who is the best miner for cpu zcoin now ? .

I have ordered ryzen 1700 with asus x370 prime pro . I dont know when arrived , i think 15 march .

well i believe any cpu even a few older cpus can excel on any one task.. (microsoft directx 12 code actually made the an older 2010 AMD K10 based processors increased its mathematical output in most cases up to 200% in multi-core) ..in par for todays uses in cpu mining.. for Amd , their last great and best cpu im own opinion was the K10 series..  as long the mining program uses optimized SSE2 , SSE3 compilers for AMD64 code can make any AMD or even a Intel chip fly fast.. I wouldnt use cryptonight as my only method on evaluating performance. if the difficulty is to high, even a brand new cpu like the AMD ryzen or a I7 will flop...  seriously. cpuming is only good for low difficulty scaling and if any one remember the last time you cpu mined bitcoins .. almost all cpu mining failed and even with the best cpu of the day because the difficult level surpassed cpu computations so it wasnt a slow death.. like almost over night all bitcoin mining on a cpu level was dead!!        

Ryzen 8 core at 4ghz can get 800 KH/s on ZCoin

Assuming your R7 1700 is not a silicon lotto failure and can OC to 4 ghz it could pretty much ROI at the same speed as a GTX 1070. Far as efficiency a 1070 is more efficient largely because the ZCoin GPU miners do not pull much power from the cards

The ZCoin algo is going to hardfork again in 2-3 months so I wouldn't specifically get Ryzen just for ZCoin

wow nice speed btw :)

Monero performance update from Serve The Home:

"1x AMD Ryzen 7 1800X = 537H/s 
1x AMD Ryzen 7 1700X = 516H/s
1x AMD Ryzen 7 1700 = 481H/s"


https://forums.servethehome.com/index.php?threads/monero-mining-performance.12116/ (https://forums.servethehome.com/index.php?threads/monero-mining-performance.12116/)

This performance is a stock . Ryzen easy go 4 ghz at air .

Any news for performance with ryzen ? .

Usually

A silicon loser 1700 will fail at 4ghz

See this video :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KEqRK_Ora9M

.

Did anyone actually start mining with ryzen? Whats the hashrates on monero or zcash?

I want same news .

Did you two even read any of the posts above? ::)

We did test the 1700X: https://www.nicehash.com/?p=news&id=148

I got a bit moar of dem hashes out of a 1700X:

595 H/s @ 3.7GHz @ 1.2V:

https://i.imgur.com/TSzkeM2.png

650 H/s @ 4.0 GHz @ 1.42V:

https://i.imgur.com/DZnFMdu.png

Affinity in the config.txt set to even numbers of threads (0,2,4,6,8,10,12,14) and nothing else can be running in the background or the hashrate takes a big hit.

https://www.servethehome.com/monero-mining-benchmarks-cpu-mining-amd-ryzen-7-systems/ (https://www.servethehome.com/monero-mining-benchmarks-cpu-mining-amd-ryzen-7-systems/)

I just ran the benchmark in the Nicehash miner and came up with 435.9 H/s - This is with a 1700X @ 4.0 Ghz and 2933Mhz DDR4. I did have some things running in the background, so that may have influenced it.

So I want to know, what the best configuration for ryzen in terms of watts? and what the best currency for this cpu and how miner.

Since you are one of the lucky ones that has a Ryzen yet, can you do done tests more?
Maybe try some other miners and report frequencies.I hope that some other miners will outperform nice hash

Review a little too spartan. you can not deal with all the algorithms comparing them with Intel i7 7700k? .

I installed and ran the latest MinerGate software, the results are below. Compared to the results from Nicehash it would appear that MinerGate isn't utilizing Ryzen very well. The one exception being AEON with a MUCH higher hashrate, but it crashed the PC within 30 seconds.

All with 15 Cores (16 cores made no difference other than making the system laggy)

AEON - ~560 H/s - Not Stable, crashes computer.
BCN - ~160 H/s
DSH - ~160 H/s
ETC - ~887 kH/s
ETH - ~887 kH/s
FCN - ~160 H/s
INF8 - ~160 H/s
MCN - ~160 H/s
QCN - ~160 H/s
XDN - ~160 H/s
XMR - ~160 H/s

XMR with 15 cores - ~160 H/s @ 63 watts
XMR with only 8 Cores - ~340 H/s @ 65 watts   
XMR with only 4 Cores - ~195 H/s @ 46 watts

Clearly something if off with the number of cores/threads not being used properly. The XMR results at 8 Cores, 340 H/s @ only 65 watts isn't too bad. With more optimized miners I could see the cheaper R5 series being an option to at least consider for mining down the road when motherboards are more available etc....

This was with a R7 1700X 4.0 Ghz @ 1.35 volts

If you have a different CPU miner that you would like me to test let me know and I might be able to benchmark it. :)

Can you do some testing with cpuminer-opt? The following algos are suggested:

Cryptonight: cache bound, threads = L3 cache MB / 2 MB, so 8 threads on 1700x. Already understood,
excellent performer.

Deep: compute bound and heavilly optimized for AES and AVX2, Comparing performance with Intel on
a thread and clock basis will give an indication of how well AVX2 was implemented. Should be able to
load all threads.

Lyra2z330: I/O bound, large array too big for cache. With only a 2 channel memory controller it likely won't
compete with Intel E series. Performance will likely peak with fewer than N threads.

It would also be good to confirm thread order. On Intel default affininity assigns one thread to each physical core before
using HT. Someone suggested Ryzen assigns threads diffferently when threads less than number of virtual cores.

so is this still the best kinda options compared to using ryzen to mine with then?

what cpu's would you all recommend with the 2011v1 board. taking into consideration power draw, mb, core count

So what is the best currency to ryzen now? and with what miner. thanks for those who want to explain.

I'm not sure if I understood everything you posted, but I will try to test some of those options when I have some extra time. I haven't even tried any CPU mining since the early days of Bitcoin, so I'm not at all up to date on it. ;)

Probably Monero (XMR), at least that is what I would probably do if I was looking to CPU mine regularly.

 You DO realise that the R7 1700X is a *8 core* CPU, not a 16 core?

 Threads via hyperthreading are NOT additional cores, they are more about being able to split usage on a core to be able to do 2 low-utilization things at once on a core.


 A lot of software is MISidentifying the Ryzen 1700/1700X/1800X as 16 CORE cpus, because they mark the first time AMD has put Hyperthreading into a CPU.

Of course I know it's an 8 core 16 thread cpu. I was using the specific terminology in the program so that others can observe, compare, and replicate it if they have a R7 CPU themselves.

I have a single E5 2695 V2 mining monero on a dual 2011 board, its been running for a week and a half with zero issues so I have not needed to shut it down to plug it into my kill-a-watt meter.

It does run cooler than the 2670 v1's I sold.

I won a bid on ebay for one and was outbid on the second one so thats why i'm running just one.

Plus the Ryzen 8 cores use two 8 mb L3 cache's and if data is swapped from one L3 to the other it slows things down quite a bit, so I appreciate the info because AMD has a tendency to run unusual cache architecture on some of their cpu's and the more test data that is out the better.

Example on my FX 8320 mining monero:

AMD FX 8320 at 4.4 GHz VERY unusual results! LOL

Running XMR-STAK-CPU: only max listed, after a few minutes it would settle on a slightly lower hash rate.
8 threads= 305 H/s
7 threads= 435 H/s
6 threads= 329 H/s
5 threads= 324 H/s
4 threads= 219 H/s
3 threads= 217 H/s
2 threads= 111 H/s
1 thread = 107 H/s

The 8 core FX cpu's have a 8MB L3 cache AND each module pair has 2MB of L2 cache so the cpu has a total of 16 MB of cache.

So you would think that 8 threads would be ideal for monero, its not because of the cpu module's and 4 threads are not the fastest but they are the only down a little from the max seen with 7 threads and run much cooler and use a bit less wattage.

So look at the results above, 1 thread is 107 H/s and then 2 threads only hash 4 H/s more, then a BIG jump in the hash rate running 3 threads, then another tiny jump running 4 and on and on until 7 threads.

So running 1 thread per module on a FX cpu is the most efficient thing to do.

Running XMR-STAK-CPU on only 1 thread per module and there still is unusual results.

EDIT: I just remembered that I had lowered the speed to 4.0 GH/z before I did the testing below so at 4.4 GH/z it would hash higher.

If I set the affinity to even numbered threads 0,2,4,6 it hashes at ~339 H/s.

If I change it to use threads 1,3,5,7 it hashes at ~385 H/s.

So testing and sharing data can help everyone even tho it may not interest everyone.

I don't know if anybody else are mining monero on a fx cpu but if they are what I have found will help them.

EDIT: My theory on why FX cpu's mining monero is fastest using one thread per module is because of that 2mb L2 cache per module is that cryptonyte is running in L1 and L2 and if you run more than one thread per module the two threads are forced to share the single L2 and then have to swap to L3 therefore there is almost no speed improvement.

Best algo for amd ryzen 8 core now ? .

Ryzen new faster cpu is coming.

Thought I'd contribute my experience mining with an 1600X:

Using xmr-stak-cpu mining Monero I get on average just over 400 H/s running 6 threads.

My 1600X is downclocked to 3.5 GHz @ 1.087 V (SVI2 TFN). CPU+SoC power draw reported as 64 W (SVI2 TFN).

Although I can get above 430 H/s overclocking to 3.9 GHz, it is not worth the extra power draw. 3.3 to 3.5 GHz is the most efficient for Ryzen chips.

Personally I am very impressed and happy with the results.

Seriously? That type of hashrate will yield less than $1/day with electricity factored in.

Really no point imo...

Even at 400 hash you get a CPU that pays for itself within 6 months at current prices. Since you need a CPU to mine with your GPUs anyways why not get one that pays for itself, brings in a little profit after that and also has good resale value?

For those that have an 8 core Ryzen and have not been able to reach 600+ hashrate on XMR, you will need to enable large page files (requires Windows Pro). Once I did that I went from ~450-470 to 600-630 hashrate on my R7 1700X @ 4.0 ghz.  It's a nice boost in AEON too (the most profitable CPU coin right now).

My friend just got a Ryzen 1700 and haven't played with overclocking yet (using stock cooler, too).  I sent him a script and cpuminer-opt (forgot version - at least 3.6.x) and he was getting 161 kH/s for m7m and 145 kh/s with xevan.

For context, I have a 4770k OC'd to 4.3 GHz and get 108 kH/s m7m and 87 kh/s xevan.  It's an average of 63.5% faster than my CPU, and he didn't even OC.

Just got one if my own.  OC'd to 3.7 GHz and getting 206 kh/s with m7m

Hi man, Are you talking about  Virtual Memory? if not, how i enable large page files?

Basically you are telling windows that it can use larger pages amounts of physical memory instead of virtual memory, at least that's my understanding of it. You need to assign "lock pages" privileges to the user account that will be mining. Follow the steps here and it should work --- https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms190730(v=sql.105).aspx --- you may need to reboot afterwards and when you start the miner you will need to right click and run as administrator for the changes to take effect.

I 'm thinking to buy new threadripper ryzen 16-core version with 32 threads for mining,
also I need new PC for personal use.
I watch lot of videos about new ryzen processors, seem they don't spend much energy especially this one I'm talking about.
Looking to mine alt coin with X11 chained hashing algorithm.
Can somebody tell me how profitable it is? Some estimates of profit?

X11 is mineable with ASIC. So it is not profitable to mine with CPU.

I would love to try mining with a nice new Threadripper CPU, but not all algorithms support more then 8 threads, so it might not be much better for those. In instances where more threads are supported I suspect it will be amazing. If it didn't require a new motherboard I'd consider upgrading my personal PC for one. :)

Requires a new motherboard, socket is different >:(

Pretty impressive CPU for mining. In addition to everything in the R7 it also has 4 channel memory.
I also like that the L3 cache scales with the number of cores. The 16 core Threadripper should perform
about double the 8 core R7 at the same clock speed. It'll be interesting to see how the price compares.

I'd like to build a Threadripper + 8 GPUs rig, hahaha...

Any one can point me the direction to mine with one rig using both cpu and gpu? I cannot find any useful information...TIA

I have a Ryzen 5 1600 that gives ~400H/s,  default settings and fastest official supported memory for the AM4 socket.
I run 6 threads
enabled large page files

Just ordered my 1500x, has anyone tried it already? Would be grateful for any information :)

I'd like to know if you get any benefit from running  more than 4 threads on that processor since it should have crosstalk between the CCX's.  The Ryzen 5  1400 would also be nice to look at for a mining rig cpu but it would only be able to run 4 threads because of it's L3 cache and in theory it doesn't have the CCX latency issue, which could help with less expensive RAM as well.

That specific thread limitation only applies to cryptonight due to it's specific memory use. Other algos have different
characteristics and limitations.

The modular cache is not an issue for mining because miner threads are pinned to a core. There are only problems if a thread
moves to another core on a different CCX. When this happens there is a double hit because the data on the "from" CCX cache
has to be flushed to memory and then loaded into the "to" CCX cache.

There is a more subtle effect of modular L3 cache affecting shared data. If the same data is accessed from multiple threads
on different CCXs that data needs to be loaded from memory into the cahes of multiple CCXs increasing the memory load.
A thread can't benefit from data cached by another thread. If the data is modified it creates even more memory load as the
modified data needs to be immediately written to memory and all other CCXs that access that data need to reload it.

Anyone get SHA working?

With the 16 core 32 thread "Threadripper" CPU coming out fairly soon from AMD, would you be able to list any algorithms that can support that many threads? I'm debating whether or not to get one and if I could find a cooler to handle it I might just have it mine abit to pay for itself if I do nite the bullet and buy one.

That requires compute intensive algos and most compute intensive algos are dominated by GPUs or ASICs. What's good
for CPU is even better for GPU. Conversely what's bad for CPU is worse for GPU. The only compute intensive algo I can think of
with no GPU miner yet available (that could change at any time) is xevan.

It's memory performance where CPUs have an edge over GPUs so don't get hung up trying to load all the cores on the CPU.

I usually don't give direct advice but I would buy the CPU with the highest cache/core ratio. If the 10, 12 core versions have the
same cache as the 16 core version (32 MB IIRC) you can save some money by getting fewer cores, as long as there are enough cores to
keep the memory/cache system fully loaded.

Could you kindly point me the direction to mine with one rig using both cpu and gpu? I cannot find any useful information...TIA

To both CPU mine and GPU mine you just need to run both a CPU miner program and a GPU miner program at the same time. Unless you have a fairly powerful CPU it may not be profitable to mine with it, but it's technically possible to do so with any semi modern CPU.

Just tested aeon on the 1400...does about 700 h/s so not bad (8 threads). I cant enable large page size on the home version of windows 10 im running though.

EDIT: figured out paging...now doing about 800 h/s on 6 threads

My FX 8230e does about 320h/s with six threads for Monero which is about 40% of what an RX480 can do on average. If you mine Monero with GPUs, you can also mine with the CPU as it's going to be sitting idle anyways.

Does anyone know what SHA versions the Ryzen family supports?
This is just curiosity on my part I'm just interested in PacalCoin and PascalLite which is SHA-265

SHA256, needs openssl 1.1 and compiler support, ie gcc 5.

Hi, what hashrate is on Ryzen R5 1600X?

You should be able to get ~450 hashrate on Monero with locked pages enabled (on Windows 10 Pro at least). We have several R5 1600s and they get 400-450 hashrate at stock settings. A 1600X is clocked a little higher I believe so it should get a few more hashes at it's stock settings.

It is really awesome performance to run at 800h/s, I just checked with whattomine and you can get $1.45 per day on monero, not a bad profit. And yet, 1400 is not expensive though.

You're confusing AEON and Monero, which use 2 different algorithms. 800 H/s in AEON is not going to be the same on Monero. For example, we have several R5 1600 CPUs. At stock settings they do ~1400 in AEON (Cryptonight Lite algorithm) and ~430 on Monero (Cryptonight algorithm).

I have one running at 3.9 G and get 480 h/s mining XMR.

I have Ryzens in my rigs - built especially with monero in mind and my results are following (large pages enabled in Win 10):
Ryzen 5 1600X (3,8 Ghz at 1.23V) - stable 540 - 550 Hash/s - consumes ca 44W from wall
Ryzen 7 1700 (3,8 Ghz at 1.23V) - stable 630 Hash /s - consumes ca 44W from wall
I believe that I can get near 4 Ghz - but this setup is 24/7 rock solid and doesnt lead to unnecessary restarts of the system. Wattage was measured as a difference between idle system and CPU-only mining turned ON.
Ill build new rig with Ryzen 5 1600 this weekend - but I guess the results will be same as for 1600X - cause L3 cache and number of cores are identical.

Will overclocked 1600 give the same hashrate as 1600x?

Just did quick math on ryzen 1600 build,at current monero price roi is about 450 days with cpu mobo and ddr4 wich doesnt seems so bad considering that xmr is having 1/3 price pull back

Thanks for the info I am pretty interested in seeing what the Ryzen 5 1600 does if you don't mind sharing!

We have 5 of them and they do ~430 (max of about 460 on one, lowest about 420) on Monero at stock settings. The motherboards they are in don't seem to support much in the way of overclocking so we left them at stock settings. On a gaming oriented motherboard they should overclock up close to 4.0 ghz for a decent boost in hashrate with a little more power consumption.

Hi all,

I was hoping one of you could help me troubleshoot my r5 1600, as you all seem to be getting 400 H/s stock. Meanwhile, here's how my CPU's been performing:

1 thread: 60 H/s (max values)
2 threads: 110 H/s
3 threads: 160 H/s
4 threads: 240 H/s
5 threads: 180 H/s
6 threads: 140 H/s
7 threads: 100 H/s

I can't understand why my chip's hashrate is peaking at 4 threads when you all are reporting optimal rates at 6 threads.

I've gone through all the necessary steps (locked paging file), and I'm really stuck here.

Claymore's miner yields similar results, although I have only tried with 3 and 4 threads.

The only thing I can think of is that stak's miner could have been updated since the pre-compiled version that I downloaded, although I doubt that's the cause for this behavior.

Any suggestions? I'd really appreciate it!

Post your config file, please.

So I built the rig with Ryzen 5 1600 (without X) - and was quite amazed. That thing is performing even better than my other 1600X CPUs :D I get stable 560 H/s from it - again at 3.8 Ghz. I guess it was a lucky pick of the CPU.

If You get below 500 (around 450 H/s) on Your 1600 CPUs - I may know where problem is. Im not sure if I should tell You - cause Youll be taking away my profits by mining better :D But I am a good person so Ill tell You. (You can alway send me some monero scraps to: 4JUdGzvrMFDWrUUwY3toJATSeNwjn54LkCnKBPRzDuhzi5vSepHfUckJNxRL2gjkNrSqtCoRUrEDAgR wsQvVCjZbRwc3EtMhPPX3gZ4daM ) :D

1st - follow this guide and unlock large pages in Win (https://www.usxmrpool.com/#easy_mining_guide)
2nd - cause You have 8 possible threads (16 MB L3) - but just 6 cores - it DOES matter on which cores You do the mining. Cause two cores will be under heavier load. And Windows uses cores from "beginning" - so usually core 1 and 2. If You put 2 threads on these two first cores - Youll see lower hashrates.

so configure xmr-stak-cpu like this:
{ "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : false, "affine_to_cpu" : 0 },
{ "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : false, "affine_to_cpu" : 2 },
{ "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : false, "affine_to_cpu" : 4 },
{ "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : false, "affine_to_cpu" : 6 },
{ "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : false, "affine_to_cpu" : 8 },
{ "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : false, "affine_to_cpu" : 9 },
{ "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : false, "affine_to_cpu" : 10 },
{ "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : false, "affine_to_cpu" : 11 },

when I had it 0/1/2/3/4/6/8/10 - my hashrates were in those 450 ranges

hope it helps

Thanks for trying to help me out, I really appreciate it.

My page file is configured to be 16 Gb at the min, 24 Gb at the max. While running the miner, it hovers around 16 Gb.

Funnynuffy, I followed that exact guide in setting up the miner, and I've locked page files in memory, granting access to the default user (myself). Maybe I should try allowing this function for root? Is that a thing?

Here's the "interesting" part of my config file:

[
   { "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : true, "affine_to_cpu" : 0 },
   { "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : true, "affine_to_cpu" : 2 },
   { "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : true, "affine_to_cpu" : 4 },
   { "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : true, "affine_to_cpu" : 6 },
],

I've tried the following as well:

[
   { "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : true, "affine_to_cpu" : 0 },
   { "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : true, "affine_to_cpu" : 2 },
   { "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : true, "affine_to_cpu" : 4 },
   { "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : true, "affine_to_cpu" : 6 },
   { "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : true, "affine_to_cpu" : 8 },
   { "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : true, "affine_to_cpu" : 10 },
],

[
   { "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : false, "affine_to_cpu" : 0 },
   { "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : false, "affine_to_cpu" : 2 },
   { "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : false, "affine_to_cpu" : 4 },
   { "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : false, "affine_to_cpu" : 6 },
   { "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : false, "affine_to_cpu" : 8 },
   { "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : false, "affine_to_cpu" : 10 },
],

[
   { "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : false, "affine_to_cpu" : 1 },
   { "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : false, "affine_to_cpu" : 3 },
   { "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : false, "affine_to_cpu" : 5 },
   { "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : false, "affine_to_cpu" : 7 },
   { "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : false, "affine_to_cpu" : 9 },
   { "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : false, "affine_to_cpu" : 11 },
],

Yet these behave similarly, netting ~140 H/s.

On HWMonitor, I can't get the CPU to draw more than 30W, which oddly makes sense (240 H/s is more or less half of what I'm expecting, and others have posted CPU draws of ~60W).

I have one 8 GB stick of 2400 MHz RAM in there, and I'm running Win10.

Thanks again!

Wow! Okay, so I just realized what's wrong.

I received a Ryzen 5 1400 instead of a 1600...

I can't believe I didn't notice that only four cores were enabled on HWMonitor...

I apologize for wasting your time, gents!

Nevermind - then just run 4 threads (8MB L3 cache) - each on physical core (0,2,4,6) - and You should get maximum performance for Your CPU.
Btw one additional finding - when I dual mine ETH + something on my GPUs (1070) - each card draws around 100-110W (undervolted). And its possible to surf net, do administrative work etc. But when I switch GPUs to Monero - power draw is reduced to 60-70W per card, earnings +- similar to ETH - but its no longer possible to work on computer. Its as slow as my old 486 SX 25MHz machine or even ZX Spectrum :D
Btw - those 1070s are doing 700-710 Hashes on Monero - so considering the price - Ryzen CPUs win (at least in my country)

There is nothing amazing. 1600X is only overclocked 1600.
But everybody can do it himself.

I've recently started to CPU mine Monero using xmrig.exe (I tried to compile xmr-stak-cpu from source, but unfortunately I can't afford to quit my daytime job to fix all problems I encountered) in administrator mode on Windows 10, meaning Huge pages are activated. I have a Ryzen 1700 processor (not overclocked) that I currently get about 300 H/s from.

Isn't this a bit low? I've seen people in this thread mention hash rates above 500 H/s. Is there any tweaking that I could perform to get a larger hash rate? I pretty much have no idea what I'm doing, but I'm eager to learn :)

I was getting 400 on my fx8350 but the power part wasn't worth it are you guys gpu mining along side cpu mining if so what motherboards are u running

Try installing Nicehash and running it in Administrator mode in order for locked pages to function correctly. See what the benchmark is for Monero after doing that - it will let you know if there's a need to configure your miner better etc... since it's all automated.  You can expect to top 600 hashrate if you Overclock your 1700.... even as high as 630-650 at 4.0 ghz.

Picked up a Ryzen 3 1300x for my wifes build, damn this thing is powerful for the cost!
Does 400kh/s on Zcoin, 300ish on XMR, same performance as my 6th gen i-7 that cost x2, wow.
Gonna get a threadripper i think for next build, regret getting just a 3 this go around :(

Try this config. You should expect 590 h/s at 3.8 Ghz

"cpu_thread_num" : 8,
"cpu_threads_conf" :[
    { "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : true, "affine_to_cpu" : 0 },
    { "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : true, "affine_to_cpu" : 2 },
    { "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : true, "affine_to_cpu" : 4 },
    { "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : true, "affine_to_cpu" : 6 },
    { "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : true, "affine_to_cpu" : 8 },
    { "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : true, "affine_to_cpu" : 10 },
    { "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : true, "affine_to_cpu" : 12 },
    { "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : true, "affine_to_cpu" : 14 },
],

prices on I7 are dropping plus you can get an 8 thread xeon kaby lake now for $200
I dont think ryzens are really worth dealing with the low amount of 8 plus gpu motherboards

I am not mining with my ryzen.

start mining biblecoin with ryzens= it very stable for this cpu on this coin

whats the biblecoin hash rate? with ryzen?

will biblecoin be worth anything? seems kind like a uselses coin

Thanks! I guess these commands are for xmr-stak-cpu, and not for xmrig, right? Can't get them to work in xmrig.

Yep, that looks like xmr-stak-cpu settings to me.  I have not tried xmrig myself since xmr-stak-cpu has always been stable and efficient in our use of it.

i suppose xmr stack cpu gives u the highest hashrate.  im currently running amd ryzen 1700(no x version) on asus x370 pro  @3.850mhz stock air cooler. getting about 550h/s in claymore xmr cpu miner.hadnt time to oc better. should have configured xmr stack.
u know what is best about ryzen?  even if i put load on 8 real cores ,i have no drop in hashrate for any gpus. this is way beyond expectations as intels are the other way around.i dont know why mining ppl do not buy amd for their rigs. the mainboards northbridge chip is also cool at load.

tweak : just remember  to activate 'high performance' in power options of windows. if not, u will get about 350h/s
dont forget to enable 'lock pages in memory'  as well.

how about power usage ? is it stable when you are activating high performance ? need more info about this ryzen
want to build new ryzen rig, since im amd big fans hehehe

Just for info, I'm doing 1370 h/s XMR with XMR-STACK-CPU on a stock Threadripper 1950x.

We have 5 Ryzen CPUs in my wife's small mining farm and 2 Ryzen CPUs in personal computers. They have all been CPU mining for several months at a minimum and we have never had a single issue with them. They are very stable and power consumption is quite reasonable if you don't overvolt them. Temperatures are lower then when running CPU benchmarks or stress tests too. Ie. mining has lower temps then running Cinebench etc...

what are u mining ? with rizen ? i tried bible pay but ryzen is terrible on that, way slower than I7

Temps depend on the algo. Cryptonight and other memory hard algos run relatively cool.
If you want a hot algo try keccak. I'm particularly interested in the 1700. It comes
with a cooler and has a lower TDP, besides being cheaper than the 1700X. Do you OC?

i have a plan to build new computer with ryzen inside with the spec amd ryzen, mobo gigabyte ab350, ram 8 gb, hdd 1 tb. is it good to start mining? because i have another idea to add one graphic card inside so if i want to mining in anytime, i can start without having any problem. but it will cost too much because the graphic card is too expensive. for the cpu itself, it cost me almost $500. i am thinking to redesign the spec so it will go cheaper but the spec is good.

my hashrate was for 7 threads fro xmr. leaving one for when im typing here or something:d  
no that is ok.important fact is that CPUs do not age like GPUs so i order them to work. why not.
XMR STACK  has some sort of configurations like low power mode.  disabling threads .playing with them and removing some threads from mining does reduce power consumption to 80w. without a huge reduction in hashrate.

Yeah, I bought the 1700X for my personal workstation/gaming rig when it first came out, but if I had to do it all over again I would have bought a 1700 instead and saved the money.  Both of them are overclocked at 4.0 on all 8 cores @ 1.425 vcore, but the 1700 runs at least 5-6c cooler under the same workload when compared to the 1700X. The 1700 is on a 120mm AIO cooler and the 1700X is on a 240mm AIO cooler but it's still hotter due to the higher power consumption.  For whatever reason the 1700X does ~2150 on AEON whereas the 1700 only does ~2070 at the same clocks and settings. I don't know if that's due to better silicone or different motherboards between the two PCs.

I don't think the Wraith cooler that comes with the 1700 would handle 1.425 vcore, but you could probably OC it to 3.8-3.9 on 1.35 vcore and it would handle that just fine.

My guess for the performance variance Is something with the CPU. There has to be a cost for the significantly lower TDP. If it runs 5-6C cooler
at the same clock it must be doing less work.

I'm using the 1700 (non x) stock at 3.0 GHz. Using only 7 cores (following the 0,2,4,6,8,10,17) and I manage to get around 464 h/s while using other apps in the background. Very cool and quiet cpu.

Hi all
Can anyone make me a benchmark with Ryzen 7 1700 and Ryzen 5 CPU for hodl coin ?
This coin is for CPU only and is optimised for AVX2 instructions
The miner is on this adress http://hodl.optiminer.pl/  and for start benchmark create a *.bat file and write on it hodlminer.exe --benchmark
I would appreciate some printscreen if you can.
Thank's in advance !

ryzen 1500x  up to 475 H/s average 450 H/s

This after the recent win 10 update before I was getting max 380 H/s

I have made comparison b/w CPU wolf miner and xmrig. Xmrig gives me higher hashrate, up to 20%.

Totally agree. I've test on My E3-1230 with 8Mb cache L3. 4 cores give the best hashrate (~225H/S).

OK this is my first post here at all.. so... Hi everyone. I am also less than week into my crypto journey, so I don't fully understand EVERYTHING, but I wanted to report my results.

CPU: Ryxen 5 1600 O.C @ 3.9
MOBO: Gigabyte AX370-Gaming-K7

Using cores 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11

XMR-Stak: ~850H/s

Been trying to GUP mine Ethereum at the same time using Claymore, but with XMR running, my Ethereum rate drops from 12.8H/s to maybe 2.5H/s, so I am looking into optimizing that, as I don't think that hash rate is worth the heat. I am currently not paying for electricity. If anyone has any insight on how to get that raised back up, please let me know. My mobo allows full control of all fans and monitoring of 7-9 different thermometers, so I can keep a good eye on potential problems.

Would you guys rather mine XMR or XZC?

I have the same CPU and tried the same setup - only getting 345 for hash, even though I've set the lock pages and launched the miner with admin privileges

GPU/CPU depends on the algo selected for the coin. Some GPUs cannot mine certain algos (Nvidia cards cannot mine Xevan algo) so for a person with an Nvidia coin who wants to mine xevan, a bank of CPUs may be better for them, even though they wont be getting a lot of coins.

RX470 prices are up to $900 on some sites. on new egg its $470, good luck finding them in stock. And say you buy one for $350 like you say, where can you get a second for "a few more bucks"? that's a hell of a deal

There is no problem mining Xevan coins with Nvidia GPU (been doing that for quite some time)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2237852.0

https://www.amd.com/system/files/76955-ryzen5-vega-1920x400.jpg

Ryzen 5 2400G

What hashrate do you guys think we will get at monero on this apu?

I think somewhere around 250 hashes, the processor is on par with amd ryzen 3 1200 it seems ?

I get stable 470 h/s for CryptoNight with Ryzen 5 1600 .No oc. 3200 mhz.  My XMR-Stak settings are:

which software  do you use for cpu mining ?! and can i use cpu and gpu in same time !>?
 

I use Xmr-Stak on Ubuntu 16.04. It allows to mine with GPU and CPU same time. Also you can set the developer feed if you build it.
I get about 400-450 with my GTX 1060 for CryptoNight.

I have a Ryzen 5 1400.   I have it overclocked to 3500.
I am using the CryptoNote.CPU Miner 3.9  with a setting of -t 4
I have the power option in performance mode

I am only getting 130-160 h/s

What am I doing wrong?  (I Have the gpu miner working no problem with my rx580)

Try xmr stak instead. And threads:  0/2/4/6
Should get you to 220+ hashes atleast.

Ok using amr stak.  Shut off GPU and using CPU only.
I have this in the cpu.txt file (or did I need a line somewhere else?)
    { "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : true, "affine_to_cpu" : 0 },
    { "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : true, "affine_to_cpu" : 2 },
    { "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : true, "affine_to_cpu" : 4 },
    { "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : true, "affine_to_cpu" : 6 },

When I hit "H" in the window i see ids 0,1,2,3 = total 183....
should i be seeing 0,2,4,6 instead?

[/list]

NM,

I stuck the commands in the config file.  Now I am getting 216 h/s

That doesn't seem even remotely profitable unless monero goes back over $400 USD

I have a hashrate which changes a lot, but most of the time it seems to be like 0.5khs.
But this nets me only 0.25$ per day before electricty costs. Is this normal?

No. Its the hashrate u see, have u enabled large pages  ?

More information would be wanted. Like what pool you mine at, what coin etc etc

dwarfpool, monero

Way to little should be around a dollar.

Try out nanopool for 24 hours and report back.

I don't have AMD GPU, I need to mine with cpu. Is this possible there? I am pretty sure not with the miner, as it is called "amd GPU miner".

hey guys I recently built a new rig on Asus X370 pro with Ryzen 7 1800x CPU and Rx 560s dedicated to cryptonight after long hours of research I switched the OC settings and finally I got 751h/s on XMR from Ryzen 7 1800x I hope you enjoy the results.

https://i.imgur.com/mIWv5PP.jpg
https://imgur.com/mIWv5PP

AMD Ryzen 2400G and Ryzen 3 2200G

So we know that the Ryzen 2400G /CPU only  hashes Cryptonight  at around 150H/s , because 4mb l3 cache = 2 threads and 75 hashes per core.

It should go for both 2200G and 2400G.

Intresting part is the iGpu , will be intresting to see what the vegas can do in cryptonight and other algos.

If you get one keep us updated!

Which Ryzen is best when speaking about cost effectivity? Been playing with the idea of buying Ryzen just to mine since I don't play many games anyway.

I believe ryzen 5 1600 is at a Nice price point at the moment.

6 cores and a good stock cooler.
Should get you around 470-550H/s

New ryzen lineup will release in april so maybe  you will  want to wait.

I have Ryzen x1800 and i get around 550 h with no OC.
What version of xmr miner do you use to get above this hashrate?

ryzen 5 1600 is 550 stock, 630-650 oce'd
ryzen 7 shoud be 730h/s moderate oc

According to tests published, I expect GPU part hashrate to be between 200-250 h/s cryptonight. No joy.

what the hell are you talking about, nvidia mines xevan just fine. Ive been mining xlr with my 2 1070s and 1 1080ti at over 12mh/s

back on topic my ryzen 1700 seems to be be getting low hashrate compared to some people here. I have it oced at 3.5 and using xmrig im getting around 550h/s. cpu load sits just above 50% though as its only using 8 threads.

Im using  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2783886.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2783886.0)
Xmr stark 2.2.0

Also Windows 10 large pages enabled.
8gb 2133 ddr4 ram
I can give you my xmr stak settings if you want As well.

Thankfully I found this thread as I didn't know increasing page files would improve hashing. As for software, what is the most optimal mining for cpu mine? I am right now using nicehash, and I think it's estimating a bit low. I have a ryzen 1500x cpu not oc'ed on a MSI X370 gaming pro carbon mobo(if that makes a difference). Or should I just stick with NH? If so what are some optimal setting for the app?

I don't run AMD anything, but here are some real numbers for Intel CPU's from like right now:

http://www.cstone.net/~dk/CPU_Crypto.JPG

Argon - 2x E5-2660 v4 ES (14 cores)
Brama - 1x E5-2683 v3 ES (14 cores)
Cerebus - 1x E5-2683 v3 (14 cores)
miner05 - E5-2630L v3 (8 cores)
miner06 - 6850K (6 cores)

The first 3 are media servers / Burst miners that I have on Cryptonight since it doesn't impact their "day jobs".  The other 2 are GPU miners that happen to have decent CPU's in them.

So a little over $5.50/day for something just sitting around anyway isn't bad.  I paid about $325 for each of the 14 core processors from eBay (Japan) over the last 12 months or so.  They have pretty much all ROI'ed at this point.

Hello, I'm new to mining as a hobby and this forum so let me know if I'm butting in here and should make my own post, I'm still learning the ropes. I have a related question about my Ryzen 1600. I started using it to CPU mine Monero last night with MoneroSpelunker and SupportXMRPool. I was under the impression from the benchmarks that I read that I will be earning daily around 90 cents in USA $ but I just realized that the withdrawal threshold for most pools is at least .1 XMR, so it will be months before I see any available profit. What do you guys do in order to make your mining profits available instantly? Thank you!

Mobo??

I just reached 620H/s with Ryzen 7 at 3.7GHz and RAM at 3200.

Did you reached 700+ or are you just speculating, due the lower thread/core count between ryzen 5 1600 and ryzen 7?

Yeah it will take forever for you to get any payout with just a 1600, check out mining Electroneum @ nanopool.org (http://nanopool.org) . better profit and also you can get payout much sooner, they have a nice help page for you aswell.

Thank you, I will look into this. Sounds like a much better alternative, although I really liked the idea of Monero.

Which is better for cpu mining xmrig or xmr stack? I have been trying my hand at cpu mining with xmr stack, but I don't see to hash increase with my 1500x + nvidia gpu setup on nicehash. Nicehash will show me getting around 385-400 h/s on a 1500x oc'ed to 3.9ghz with big fan upgrade, but my revenue only goes up about .25 cents, which seems a bit low(been reading I should be closer to $1). It's also not consistent, as every minute or so it will drop down to 0h/s for a few seconds. Plus, about every 10 minutes I get the error message, "socket error - receive error socket closed." Tried a few things, but no dice. I have page filing set to 10gb and mining cryptonight. Would xmrig show me any improvements? Is there a way to get xmr to mine monero with the cpu? Thank you.

Your hashrate seems to be  on the average side of the 1500x.

About your socket error its probably concerning your network , if you have a wifi dongle or whatever.
Myself i have these usb wifi adapters TP-link TL-WN725N and they dont work on windows 10 at all, just socket error all the time.

 tried all drivers from tp link etc, but its just crap, only drivers that work are the cd drivers that come with for windows 7.

I connected to the internet via LAN, so no wifi. I had a feeling the hashrate was normal, but would it still be beneficial to switch over to xmrig over xmr; more so since I am also gpu mining?

You could try but i guess you want to mine diffrent coin on the gpus?
In that case just add this in your batch file : --NOAMD or --noNVIDIA


thats how it looks for me, the electroneum.txt that it refers to is the config file.

Where would I add that text? I am on nicehash the new version not legacy.

Ryzen 7 1800x 751 h/s

https://imgur.com/mIWv5PP
https://i.imgur.com/mIWv5PP.jpg

Hi JesterBB!

Could you share a bit more about your setup. You seem to be running Windows 10 on your machine, and to be getting an average hash rate of around 700 H/s from what I can see on the pictures. What mining software are you using, and is this for the Ryzen 1800x solely? What currency are you mining?

Cheers!

JF

P.S. I just received my Ryzen 1800x and I am in the process of building my computer.

please share youre cnfig...can only get 425hashes with high performance and memory pages..

Good result but too much oc and voltage. Better to lose 20-30h/s but save some wattage

695 hash/s - don't go by "peak" numbers, go by AVERAGE numbers.
Also, that's some MAJOR OC to get to that point - some 1800x aren't going to manage to OC that far.

At monerobenchmarks there is some one stating a 1800H/s for a threadripper 1950x, anyone as a clue how to achieve this numbers?

I get between 1000 and 1200, 1300 peak. I just leave it running and it varies overtime but I tend not to worry about pc side hashing any more, I look at poolside hash rate. Since I compiled my own miner and took out mining fee it is much more stable and performant. Not sure I believe 1800H/s. I just use out of box settings and no overclocking

1500 is possible with tr1950, well, let's say I know how to get this. 1800 - I don't no how. Maybe lie, maybe some secret "know how"

Hi

Here are my numbers

http://s1.bild.me/bilder/110417/1436692Ryzen_Monero.jpg (http://www.bild.me)

With Ryzen 7 1700 I will reach 10,000 RAC on Rosetta Cancer Research project

BiblePay (BBP)
- 10% mined coins always go to Charity (already sponsoring 200+ Orphans monthly) 
- ASIC-Resistant like Vertcoin/Groestlcoin (CPU Mining Only) 
- fork of DASH (Masternode Governance, Proposals & Voting), 10% Monthly Budget for IT/PR/P2P Live 
- Proof of BibleHash (POBh) algorithm, All Nodes are Full Nodes   

Launched July 23rd 2017, Market Cap $1-2 million
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2388064.0

New CPU Cancer Research Algorithm released,
get rewarded for contributing CPU cycles to science!

Windows Mining Guide:
https://www.reddit.com/r/BiblePay/comments/6umlqq/how_to_mine_biblepay_on_windows/

Linux Mining Guide:
https://www.reddit.com/r/BiblePay/comments/6ummuj/how_to_mine_biblepay_on_linux/

Any feedback on Ryzen 2200G or 2400G hashrates?

Anyone(besides those with TR) cpu mining still?

Yeah sure! I got a 1800x and im mining Wavi coin! Check it out, there is an announcement page here on bitcointalk. Its a CPU coin, they want to remove ASICs and bring back CPU mining to the community. I Love that message so i support them by mining them ;D

Wavi or Wabi? Cause google is showing me wabi.

I know nothing about it yet but I just had to tell Google that, yes, I did indeed mean "wavi coin" and it gave me the top result:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3146751.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3146751.0)

What are some of the coins people are currently mining on their Ryzen? I am not really finding much that isn't over $0.55 at the moment(on a 1500x).

I just have my Ryzen 7 1700 on the nicehash cpu miner, not much $ per day but better than nothing

I take cryptonightV7? What is your hasrate at? I am right now mining m7m on ahashpool but it's barely better than cryptonightv7 on my 1500x. I read that Asus motherboards has a setting in the bios called performance bias, which helps increase hashrate by 60- 90h/s. I have an MSI mobo so I don't have that feature, but could be useful to some.

Yes. It is true, I am using it. CH6.

Better late then never?

It seems that if you want to mine with this setup the best choice is to go for the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G . here in Sweden you can get the ryzen 3 2200G for 105 USD.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Benchmark: RYZEN 3 2200G + VEGA 8   315h/s   65 W   XMRIG 2.6.0 BETA 2   oc 3800, t2, cpu 152h/s, igpu 169h/s   WINDOWS 10 x64

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So if you can get around 300h/s from cpu+igpu stable its actually not a bad deal, 2 ryzen 2200G for 1 ryzen 5 1600.

PS. If anyone of you guys have preordered a 2000 series ryzen be kind enough to post some results in the thread here!

Thanks for the info. I'll still go with 2400G (135 to 145€ in France) for several reasons. Just have to wait for better pricing.

Anyone with 2700???

Must be 10 or 15% better than 1700

Yeah.
I Was thinkin of getting a 2700x due to the stock cooler.
But all depends on hashrate.
If it can pull 780-850 hashrate it would be Nice.

Let's see
I prefer 2700 with 65w instead of 2700x with 105w

you can run a 2700 at 105w and a 2700x at 65w, it all depends on ur overclock/underclock and voltage settings. I Personally prefer 2700 but if u give it a goo overclock ur gona be running most likely at 90-100w too.

Any News on The 2600/2600x 2700/2700x  as in Power consumption and hashrate.

Please post your results and configs herr.

I am curious too.

They started shipping yesterday, right?

Yea yesterday it was premiere.

From what i can see atleast they have alot better wattage @ the wall.
So the cpus will run maybe 10 celcius cooler.

Just waiting for the B450 motherboards to come out then illa buy a R5 2600

Review of Ryzen 2 2700:
https://wccftech.com/review/amd-ryzen-7-2700-cpu-review-asrock-x470-asus-x470-motherboards/12/

With its low power draw, it's interesting me more and more. At 1st I was considering the Ryzen 5 2400G to both play and mine but the 2700 could be a killer in hashing/power draw ratio.

I am very interested to see how the Ryzen 2 caching optimizations affect hashing performance.  I have read the cache should be about 10-11% faster, which is the main contributor to the overall 3% IPC improvement.  My local Microcenter is having some great deals on motherboard bundles ($50 off + $20 rebate) with Ryzen 2 CPUs right now, very tempted to pick up a 2600 to see what it can do.

I am currently hashing on a TR 1950x, Ryzen 1700, and i7-4770k.  I really don't need another system....

What cooling solution you got on your TR4? 
Here in Sweden there are no deals for cheaper x470 motherboards so im just waiting for b450s.

Meanwhile im getting more Ryzen 5 1600.

Right now I have a custom loop with Bykski block and an EK XE-480 rad.  Its waaaay overkill, but I wanted something quiet since it runs XMR-stak 24/7 and sits next to my desk in my home office.

When I first built my TR system, I got a cheap Arctic Cooler Freezer 33TR for $35 to get going.  It worked great, just couldn't overclock too high with it, but it ran fine at 3.9 Ghz.  I'm running 4.0 Ghz now @ 1.18v (custom loop), but it can do 4.2 Ghz with just over 1.4v.  But running at 4.0 is more profitable for me.

Look for deals on B350 boards, several reviewers are indicating there is almost no difference between the X470 and X370 chipsets.  I'm expecting there to be minimal differences between b350 and b450.

a very interesting new processor, can modify the programs for mining under this processor! then it will be the most profitable acquisition !!

i don't have a ryzen but i did the math on my 8700k. it makes .000058 BTC / day or 316 hashes on cryptov7 and costs about 7 cents to run per day giving a net profit of .44 cents. you're only looking at around +30 watts off idle so if it's on your rig or gaming computer it's running anyway. that's a ROI of just under 2 years

is it worth buying tons? no. however, it does pay itself off and makes a lot of sense if you casual mine on a gaming rig

saying cpu's will never have an ROI is a mathematical impossibility

from what i understand ryzen v2 is better than intel from a hashing to watt perspective so if intel is a 2yr ROI the new ryzen have to be under that. not terrible. the way i see it is i may as well use it to make money when i'm not gaming

Ryzen 7 1700 is getting me 1,000+ BBP per day ($3/day)
and I feel good contributing to Cancer/Disease Research

Using a AMD Ryzen 1800x with water cooling. Altho the water cooled part was compeletly a waste due to not being able to clock the CPU for more than 100mhz. On cryptonightv7 i get around 435. This feels abit low to me, anyone got any tips? Please PM.

WTF? I just tried to read code on Github and there are only dummy sleep intervals in mining code, no actual research computations ... Am I wrong?

You got a beast there! :p
I have seen prices drop for 1920x so im feeling the urge to buy it.

From reviews that i read seems noctua tr4 cooler even "better" then the aio cooler.

I'm also waiting to hear about the new 2700 and 2700x what hashrate they get cpu mining

is it worth ti ? mining better than gpu?

well, I do not think that ryzen cpu is mining better then GPU, but, there is always a but!
here, look,  firstly you need to put into your rig CPU anyway , right?! so the choice is between cheap celeron or ryzen 2700 ( it was the call for me)
I choose ryzen cpu, why? cause with celeron I can't mine anything.. with ryzen I can mine monero and it gives more then half hashrate of full rx480/580 card
i mean ryzen 2700 overclocked to 3.7ghx pumps about 570-580h/s on asrock and even higher on asus mb, rx 480 pushes about 950 h/s with proper bios...
so based on some profit calculator my ryzen will ROI after a year.. not bad, right?

Its not about mining better then a gpu.

From my own point of view you need a cpu either way right?
If you get a ryzen atleast your cpu will have a good chance to pay for itself.

Just a question do overclocking the CPU provides any boost in hash rates? Also is the new AMD Ryzen 2700x be a good CPU to buy to CPU mineable altcoins because of the performance boost? As I have seen in some reviews it has around 10-15% boost in synthetic benchmark and IPC with better overclocking head room and better powerdraw? What do you guys think about it?

Its the big question right.
We just have to wait for some benchmarks.
If the 2700x will hash same as 1900x it will be golden.

So a dude on reddit were getting 600-610 hashes monero using :
2700x @ stock 3850,  biostar tb350 6gpu rig, 4gb ram 2133,

Not sure what mining program nor had he enabled large pages yet.

I was able to find this link on google:
http://www.planet3dnow.de/cms/37852-summit-ridge-vs-pinnacle-ridge-beim-monero-mining/

Cheers Man!
Intresting. 17% higher hashrate.

Slow memory for this CPU, should be minimum 2933MHz, even 3200MHz. May be the CPU is slow down by the mem speed.

Microcenter has the 1950x for $730 right now, so check it out if you can.

Noctua TR coolers are very good, well actually all their coolers are very good...  I went with Arctic for a cheap temp solution, knowing i would re-use my custom loop eventually.

Hmm, I ran a bunch of tests yesterday on my 1700 and found that RAM speed had very little impact on Ryzen hashing performance with XMR-stak.  Running 3.7 w/2133 memory was getting about 570 h/s.  Running 3.7 w/3200 memory was getting about 575 h/s but used about 15 more watts due to the RAM overclock voltage (1.2v vs 1.4v).  Also, please note these are XMR-stak monero7 hash rates while co-mining with Claymore on 5x1070s.  If I shutdown Claymore I get about 610 h/s.

Edit:  Just saw that post, dude replied that he did NOT have large pages enabled.

i did not have good cpu in past. now i have amd ryzen 1600. can anyone say xmr hashrate? ı think it does not make money more than it consumes electricity.

Search for 1600 here (probably 450-550 h/s):

http://monerobenchmarks.info/searchCPU.php

Plug in numbers here:

https://whattomine.com/coins/101-xmr-cryptonightv7

You will be surprised how much you can make right now mining Monero with these Ryzen cpus.

RAM speeds shouldn't make a big difference, the whole point is to run each miner instance on 2 Mb CPU L3 cache...

update:  2700x , TB350-BTC, 4 gb 2133 ram , 6 rx 570 ,  at stock speed with large pages hes getting 680h/s

with some mining program tweaking and OC 700+  no problem.

Impressive numbers for a mainstream CPU.

I just got a Ryzen 5 2400g for a new mining rig today. When I fire it up tomorrow, I will let you guy's know.

any review for yescryptr16 algo?
i still used 1700x, looking more info is it worth to upgrade 2700x or not

Ryzens are beasts on Cryptonight.

On other algos, they suffer a bit. Can't really tell if from their architecture, or poor optimized software.

My 1700 does 17 H/s on Arionum with 14 Threads (Argon2i + SHA512), while my puny 15W i7 7500U (laptop) does 10 H/s on 4 threads...

Verium Blake2s wasn't brilliant also.

So, the Ryzen 2400g is mining 850 h/s on IPBC without GPU enabled. I'm not the biggest techie, but it BSOD with CPU/GPU with stock settings. I'm sure if someone figured out a proper code it would mine near a stock 1700.

ryzens g-series have only half of cache memory, amd was not able to fit gpu core and big cache on this die. So it will not be as good for cryptonight as classic ryzens are

I don't understand why you would build a mining rig around a Ryzen CPU though. When it comes to mining, EFFICIENCY is the only key and major enemy. With the ryzen motherboards available right now you would be constrained to at most 8-GPU rigs. Compare that to the efficiency of a 13-GPU or better yet 19-GPU rig and what do you have..

I would say ryzen CPU mining is for gaming rigs who just want the option to mine but are not seriously doing it for profit.

Anyone know why my 1800x mining at 630 m/h on nicehash is saying it’s only 17 cents a day?? It use to show $1.50 a day running at the same 630 m/h. I know the price has come down but not that much. My 1700x at 550 mh use to give like $1.25 now it’s 15 cents a day?? Is this a nicehash glitch?

Not everyone has the money and space to have a 13-19 CPU rig...

And some people do use the computer for more than mining, keeping them on and mining when working is done.

USB hub.

Are you mining cryptonight V7 ? If you mine cryptonight "non V7", you have no profit.

Probably should have gone cheaper but it fit my set up for the current time being. To be able to keep my old gaming PC mining without any outputs and build an APU to use as a computer until i load up on FE's soon. A 6 FE rig is plenty for my first dedicated rig. Now debating whether to wait for intel's new mining cards though. Nothing is ever perfect in the mining world....

40% drop in demand for GPUs in april,; not sure Nvidia will launch new GPUs.

I have 2 rigs with 6 GPUs and 1 Ryzen 1700

It's very efficient, and I have less problems than a 19gpu rig for example
It's easier to solve any problem

6 rx 550 or 6 rx 560 +your choice of ryzen cpu makes it easy with a 750 watt psu.

Not to mention it wont break the bank to setup a low cost mining rig.

I have the latest nicehash legacy v1.8.1.10 they only offer XMRig or xmrstack? As far as I can see. What happened? I’ve been mining chump change for weeks lol

You need to update your NHML, 1.8.1.10 is not the latest version.

You need to update your miner, if im not mistaken 1,8.1.10 dont support cryptonightv7.

go to https://github.com/nicehash/NiceHashMinerLegacy/releases (https://github.com/nicehash/NiceHashMinerLegacy/releases)   and get the 1.9.0.0 - Alpha

I have a Ryzen 1600x no (further) overclock running mostly @ 3700Mhz

I'd like to share my hashrates in those new algos:

1- Mining Sumokoin (Cryptonight Heavy)
150H/s, 53C, 51W
2- Mining Graft (Cryptonight v7)
480H/s, 60C, 63W

Obs: I'm using the same cpu thread config for both. Am I supposed to expect that much lower a hashrate for CN heavy mining?

Nice

That certainly made a difference lol thanks :))

I think it too much drop

Whether the speed of mining depends on the speed of memory or speed depends only on the speed and architecture of the processor? It is beneficial to buy the latest processors for mining.

It seems that ram speed dont matter Much.

Ufdtech and sonofatech both had some reviews on Youtube and it was
not impressive.

4/8/16 gb ram you might aswell get cheap 2133 4gb ram stick, performance wise the more expensive rams are a no go.

It should be at least as fast with CPU & GPU enabled. 2GB of RAM can be dedicated to the integrated Vega cores.

May you please try with nice hash miner legacy (https://github.com/nicehash/NiceHashMinerLegacy/releases 1.9.0.0 Alpha) ? I'd like to see the hashrate with CPU/GPU enabled on the 2400G. I'm awaiting delivery of mine (+ mobo & RAM), but the mobo will be delayed.

I don't know if some other programs allow both CPU & GPU enabled.

This is not the stupid thing. You must know what you are saying and not sound dumb.

There has to be a good research that you must do before you even comment.

Hash Auger lets you use the cpu and gpu at the same time.

Seems to be Nvidia only.

There is no point buying the ROI processor if you have nothing but mining in head.

The cpu has low ROI and he is right. What are you, an idiot? Get your facts clear.

It does not really matter and there the CPU mining as well must know will never make profit.

I'm making profits with my CPUs
They are paid and I gain more than energy

And my CPUs are running on 6 GPU rig

hey there!!!

can anyone compare results on monero between 2600/2600x/2700/2700x??

I couldn't be able to find any trusted review about that, only 2700x hashrate but without comparison with the rest of the family

Thanks in advance!!

So you can expect xmr = 700+ h/s from the 2700 series even when mining with your gpus , ram speed  dont seem to do any impact more or less.

2600 i have no info on but i would expect around 600+ h/s

thanks for your reply!!

I will go for the 2600 so :)

Wow, that's a great improvement over the 1600.

Btw. Any numbers on CN heavy for the old and the new Ryzens?

2700X - 710-715 H/s CN v7 out of the box with wraith prism cooler on Asus Prime x470-Pro and bum memory sticks, 2133Mhz I think. :)
Want to put my old EK Supreme LT waterblock, but unable to find backplate for reasonable price with shipping. :( Any defualt backplate from defective AM4 mobo would also do, I just down't want to modify original to preserve warranty.

Is anyone mining V7 or heavy with a Ryzen 5 1400? If so, please tell me your hashrate. I expect 2400G to get the same (without the GPU).

Thanks.

Hey man, you mind to share what miner you're using and it's configuration?

I'm using xmr-stak, let me put the configs I have for both algos:

Note that for the 2200G and 2400G there will be a major driver update within a month or so. Right now, very old adrenaline drivers are in use for the GPU part.

Just to share, did some overclocking today on my 2700x. 4.4GHz@1.45V (60C, 19C ambient) - 780 H/s cryptonight v7.
Mining does not load this CPU so much, so it is kept barely hot at this settings.

Try this config:

{ "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : true, "affine_to_cpu" : 1 }
{ "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : true, "affine_to_cpu" : 3 }
{ "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : true, "affine_to_cpu" : 4 }
{ "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : true, "affine_to_cpu" : 5 }
{ "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : true, "affine_to_cpu" : 7 }
{ "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : true, "affine_to_cpu" : 9 }
{ "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : true, "affine_to_cpu" : 10 }
{ "low_power_mode" : false, "no_prefetch" : true, "affine_to_cpu" : 11

Power consumption should be too high for that hashrate.

When overclocking, power consumption increase not in a linear way, and you may actually loose money for a modest increase in hashrate.

My Ryzen 1700 does 520H/s at stock speeds (3.2ghz turbo). When overclocked to 3.8 ghz it does around 580-590, but power consumption goes from 65w to 100w...

CPU's often have first dibs on new coins before good GPU miners are made. Getting early mining on a coin before it reaches top 100 is indeed profitable...

Just did a build with Ryzen 7 2700X on ASUS PRIME X470
Getting hash rate ~740 on stock settings

Cryptonight V7 I presume.

R5 1500x Cn7 8 threads : 400-450 H/s
R5 1500x CnHeavy 8 threads : 140-190 H/s
R5 1500x CnHeavy 4 threads : 250-290 H/S

R5 2600 Cn7 6 threads : 500-550 H/s
R5 2600 CnHeavy 6 threads : 200-220 H/S
R5 2600 CnHeavy 12 threads : 120-140 H/S
R5 2600 CnHeavy 4 threads : 280-300 H/S
R5 2600 CnHeavy 8 threads : 160-190 H/S

result on 2600 are a bit weird with CnHeavy

We should add entries to http://monerobenchmarks.info/, the first table is for GPUs, if you scroll down there's one for CPUs

Speaking of which, do you know if those benchmarks are updated for CN7?

Ryzen 5 2400G in auto config with jce_cn_cpu_miner.027

Cryptonight V7: 170H/s max
Cryptonoght heavy: 85H/s max

Impossible to mine with the Vega IGP for the moment. A shame considering my mobo could divert 16GB DDR4 to the Vega 11 cores.

Thats because CN Heavy uses double the amount of Cache, so if all cores use the full amount of cache it gets "overloaded". With JCE you can config so some cores share the cache.
CN Light on the other hand uses half the amount of cache, so you i got 2,2KH/s on my 2700X

Could you try your 2400G with the new 18.5.1 drivers.

Tried with the 2018 Q2, because of my bios mod I have a code 43 error. So can't mine with (it's my GPUs or vega core). ATIkmdag 1.4.7 is ineffective with win 10 X64 build 1803, so I have to revert to 18.3.4 drivers and disable the Vega core in my mobo bios. Annoying, very annoying.

Can you detail that a bit please?
Ineffective for which GPU & which driver?
I've updated one of my my RX 570 rigs to Win10 1803, using the latest Adrenalin driver and I was able to patch the bios flashed GPUs with ATIkmdag... On my Vega rig I was able to flash the 56 to 64 bios a while ago without Win10 complaining or throwing off error 43's. Wouldn't want 1803 to jopardise that...

GPUs: 3X RX570 all from different manufacturers, 1 has Samsung mem, the 2 others have Elpida/Hynix.
OS: win 10 build 1803 X64

What I do: DDU drivers, restart with basic windows 10 video driver. Install Adrenalin drivers then apply ATIkmdag without reboot. Then restart.

It works with Adrenalin 18.3.4. But with Q2 driver, only the Vega cores of the 2400G are properly setup, all RX 570s have a code 43 error.

With 1803 build, I can't use atiwinflash 2.77, several people have reported the same issue.

X399 chipset

Ryzen Threadripper 1920x @ 4GHz / mem@3466MHz

CN7 with NH Legacy miner 1.9.0.2, all cores = 900-1050H/s

I basically did the same as you (except I have an Intel CPU) as the 1803 update just decided to install its own video drivers and flattened my previous install. I didn't use DDU, just installed the latest Adrenalin driver and ran the pixel patcher. The RX570's got patched properly. No more Error 43...

I wonder if the Vega cores of the 2400G are messing up the pixel patcher for you.

That's simple, the way things are now, I either can use the Vega cores, or the RX 570s. And almost no miner seems to work with the Vega 11 cores.

can any one give me a link for ati pixcel patcher 1.4.7 because i only find 1.4.6

Up to this date, there is no 1.4.7

Getting ~660 h/s with Ryzen 2600X on stock setting for CN7

Sounds nice.


What ram speed and miner are you using?

How do you guys mine with both the CPU and iGPU on the Ryzen 2 series?
For those who use XMRig, do you run the CPU / GPU miner separately?

Getting ~520 h/s with Ryzen 7 1800X, motherboard MSI B350M PRO-VDH on stock settings for CN7

ryzen 1700@3.6GHz
560H/s cn-0/1 8T
1080H/s cn-msr 8T
280H/s cn-xao 8T
240H/s cn-heavy/xhv 4T
2080Hs/ cn-lite 16T
350KH/s cn-bbr (Boolberry variant) 8T

Boolberry variant only tested with the reference CPUminer fork. If implemented on xmrig maybe it could reach 500KH/s?
Any other algos worth testing? There aren't many asic resitant algos out there, and probably the ones that claim someone is mining with some unannaunced asic/fpga anyway; The steady drop in XMR price is probably due to the fact that the algo fork was not effective enough to deter asic mining completely and they have just been dumping more slowly over the months.
Probably asic resistance should be implemented in the p2p protocol and not in the hashing algo, but I am not an expert.

What software is better to use for mine? How many hashes can amd risen 3 1200 issue? I read that on risen 5 1600 you can get 500 hashes.

JCE CN miner works very fine.

I have gotten myself a Ryzen 1800x with watercooling for my gaming PC. When i use my GPU which is a 1080ti to mine with, i also use the CPU to mine cryptonight-heavy algorithm. A 1800x gets around 180-190 hashes per second. It is a little bit low, and almost not worth it.

I paid $700 for all of the computer parts for the machine

I now get about 880 BBP (BiblePay) per day,

at $0.0015 per BBP that is $1.32/day (19 Month ROI)
at $0.0025 per BBP that is $2.20/day (11 Month ROI)
at $0.0035 per BBP that is $3.08/day (8 Month ROI)

BiblePay price has been lower recently

You should try to mine CN lite coins, it's 8 times faster (compared to heavy) on my low cache Ryzen 2400G, the result is that it's twice more profitable than mining v7 or heavy coins.

you should be able to get around 300h/s  with xmr-stak on lets say monero.

But with that hashrate alone it will take forever to get any payout for monero , try set it up for Biblepay!

Hello,

Just wondering if anyone can assist me. I have a Ryzen 1600 o/c 3.85Ghz @ 1.35v... changed windows lock pages and what not with GPEdit. Power setting to high performance. But no matter what I cant seem to get above 280 - 300 CryptoNight via Nicehash (yes I know nicehash is shitty, but simple to use for the CPU) I also run 6GPU's on the pc not using nicehash, just using NH for the ryzen 1600. But I was reading people obtaining 400 - 550 ball park, but I can't get above 300? Any more tricks for tweaking?

Thank you for any information!

-Dubzilla

Ryzen 7 1800x mining nimiq coin 45khs

Are you sure its cryptonightv7 you are running and not heavy?
I got a bunch of Ryzen 5 1600 and none of them run lower then 470h/s at stock clocks no overclock.

if you are only getting 280-300 h/s then it can only be some thread count thats wrong, that the settings are @ 4 instead of 8 threads mining.

cant think of anything else.

Thank you for the information... I checked and you were right... pretty sure it was only running on 4 threads instead of 8 using NiceHash2. So I think I did the config file correctly, which did same to make a jump. I played with the clock a bit too 3.8 @ 1.28750v stable running average 67c. However the hashrate is now averaging 378 - 390... somtimes hits 400 the drops? Any more suggestions on what I could be editing next? Do you think its because I am using nicehash and not mining XMR directly myself? Also yes it is using CryptoKnightV7 I doubled checked for sure.

No, mining via Nicehash vs and XML pool shouldn't affect the hashrate.  In Nicehash what miner software is it using for mining XMR. XMR-stak or XMRig?

I have a few Ryzen rigs mining with XMR-stak/Nicehash and they are around 600 h/s with 8 threads.

I have 700h/s+ from Ryzen 1700 OC on Monero

Yea so you need to enable large pages it will boost your hashrate 100+ h/s

To enable the lock pages in memory option

    On the Start menu, click Run. In the Open box, type gpedit.msc.

    On the Local Group Policy Editor console, expand Computer Configuration, and then expand Windows Settings.

    Expand Security Settings, and then expand Local Policies.

    Select the User Rights Assignment folder.

    The policies will be displayed in the details pane.

    In the pane, double-click Lock pages in memory.

    In the Local Security Setting – Lock pages in memory dialog box, click Add User or Group

If anyone get there hands on a Threadripper 2990x 32 core beast  and can run some monero testing it would be awsome!

80mb of l3 cache = 40 threads, would be intresting to see what sort of numbers is possible. ;D

So bits be trippin Carter ran 2990x @stock settings and got around   2 500h/s

That's what I get with 3 Ellesmere cards...  :)

Kind of disappointing actually.  I get 1450 h/s on my 1950x, and Ryzen 2nd gen has a better caching scheme (about 10% faster) than first gen Ryzen.

Yea. Maybe with some tweaking can get som higher hashes.

2500h/s @ 100w is really good.
But yeah Its really expensive.

Saw 1920x out at 300 euro. Killer Price right there!

I am looking forward to see the hashrate of the new Ryzens.

Did you mean about the upcoming NAVI series? FYI that used the same specification with radeon VII but it less efficient than it. You can try to take a look at RTX hash rate and i thought that the new NAVI models will not have a huge gap with the hashrate that already generated by RTX series.
New series used small fabrication that already used by VII.

no matter how much hashrate this processor has, mining has long ceased to be profitable on the CPU, if only on some quantum computers to mine. a ryzen gives a little more than FX 8 series.

Nope he means CPU mining, eg CN pico / turtle, argon2id, CN lite...

If we just look at the l3 cache then we can utilize  all 16 threads for the new  Ryzen 7 3700x.

Just this is a big deal,  means we can go from  8 threads mining to all 16 threads eg we  will get "same" hashrates as the threadripper = 1khs+
Then ofcourse we have the higher clocks , the ipc  and all that good stuff. All this in a 65w TDP cpu.

Also we have monero and the RandomX  alghorithm  which sure will be inzane for these cpus.
Im hyped!

With all its advantages, the price is expected $399
Or 4,44 XMR
How long will it take him to mining so much monero?
How justified is buying processors specifically for mining?
In order to make money, it is better to buy monero or bitcoin for this money right away?
This is a more win-win option.

its 329 USD for the 3700x

https://imgur.com/CgCpDmk


Ofcourse you can mine alot of other coins then just monero with ur cpu, the thing with cpu is that you need one for your rig so why not use it for mining..

But if we go RandomX  as in monero update you can see this will be godlike for cpus.

https://imgur.com/fXptxhX
And your cpu will have a good chance to pay for itself rather then a cheap celeron/pentium.

Looks good for cryptonight. The're also releasing a Ryzen 9 series with up to 16 cores, 32 threads and
72 MB cache, enough to run a full 32 threads of cryptonight with room to spare.
The R9 still uses 2 channel memory where the next bottleneck is. Need Threadripper to get 4 channels.

Hoping for some AVX2 improvements but haven't heard of any.

The 3000G series is an interesting curiosity, boasting the "most powerful graphics" on a desktop CPU.
assuming it's Radeon based it should be possible to mine with it. It might be a good choice for a GPU
rig to add a little extra hash for about the same price as an equivalent Intel CPU.

From a feature perspective AMD already beat Intel with SHA on the first gen Ryzens, and they closed
the gap with the addition of AVX2 capability if not AVX2 performance.

AMD caught up with Intel with gen1 Ryzen and is now pulling ahead while Intel continues delay its
next generation architecture, which includes AVX512,  and instead puts out refresh after refresh
of Skylake.

I thought Intel would wake up with Ryzen gen1 but their only response was to add a couple of cores
to the latest Skylake refresh and call it Coffeelake.

It's nice to see AMD giving Intel a good run but I wish intel would get their heads back into the race.

I have a 2400G, don't expect to "GPU" mine with, even with the 3400G (It's Vega based with 11CU) which is a Zen+ with 200 or 300 more MHz than the 2400G. I still like the 2400G because I can browse the internet, or watch a 1080P video while CPU and GPU mining with my RX574s.
72MB cache will be available on the 3900X, I don't think the 3950X is worth for mining, huge price gap for 4C/8T more.

Yea the 3950x might not  have best ratio for mining but ofcourse if you want it for rendering your blurays etc  then its a completely diffrent story.

ill link the pictures instead because the pictures wont display.


https://imgur.com/a/Ld1WgRO (https://imgur.com/a/Ld1WgRO)


Thats for the RandomX  algo , ryzen 7 1700 really good.

Depending on mobos prices, 3900X coud be my next CPU.

Apparently the new Gigabyte mid tier x570 will be 250 ish usd so we can expect pretty high prices for the new moteboards, unless need the new features might be a idea get a good x470.
The new generation:

16-core Ryzen 9 3950X will be priced 749  USD
12-core Ryzen 9 3900X will be priced 499 USD
8-core Ryzen 7 3800X will be priced 399 USD
8-core Ryzen 7 3700X will be priced 329 USD
6-core Ryzen 5 3600X will be priced 249 USD
6-core Ryzen 5 3600 will be priced 199 USD

Mobo + CPU + RAM is set for 500$ to 1500$.

At current crypto prices, it's not worth to buy for mining. In a bull market, it's another story.

I don't know what numbers you're talking about. but I do know that the CPU ryzen obviously going to scale to 16 threads when mining its 65W.  now even the top intel is not profitable to mine

This time only xeon series that can give a few bucks in a day, as far as i know only a high tier of AMD CPU like opteron and epic that can give a few bucks like xeon. Any series below than what i have mentioned will give nothing. I think everybody must forget to put a lot of expectation from CPU mining.

I will need a new PC anyway, why not make some money from it and mine with it while I am not using it?

Can't agree. Desktop CPUs are the way to go because of price. There is a cost jump from core to coreX and again from corex
to Xeon without any sigificant inprovement for that jump. The same with AMD Ryzen, threadripper, Epyc.

More threads, higher clocks, bigger cache seem to take priority over the higher main memory bandwidth of coreX.

The only thing is cooling. Destop CPUs (and their stock coolers) are not designed to run pegged 24/7.
Xeons are designed with much higher thermal headroom and have much slower clocks which mekes
less profitable for thier price. The used Xeon market is interesting when companies upgrade and gey rid
of their old stock cheap.

Ryzen is looking even better and I'm getting less interested in Cannonlake, even though it will have AVX512.
It looks like the steam is running out of the SIMD battle. There doesn't seem to be much demand for AVX512.
And that statement may have contradicted what I just said in the previous paragraph. AVX512 may make
Xeons more attractive to miners.

Yea Ryzen just kicks ass all over the table... Cores/threads and for cryptonight algos it just blows away competition, not to mention this 3rd gen we will get to play with double the threads for mining and decent cooler included and all!

With randomX happening well ryzen got the brightest of futures.

Which CPU is better to buy from this list, If choose in terms price / hashrate?

It depends on  which algo you gonna mine i suppose.  But lets say you gonna mine any of the cryptonight algos.

Then you could get any of the Ryzen 5 3600 , Ryzen 7 3700X, Ryzen 9 3950X.

Ryzen 5 = 12 threads
Ryzen 7 = 16 threads
Ryzen 9 = 32 threads

So the only one thats not recommended  would be 3800x, 3600x and thats because they got cheaper in same  category.

Personally im gonna get a  Ryzen 3700x  so i can max out the l3 cache and i cant afford the 16 core one.     

I think we should not wait for cosmic results. The Ryzen 7 3700X, AMD claims, is 18% faster than the 2700X model in multithreaded computing and 28% faster than the Intel Corei7-9700K.
If the purchase of a new processor from AMD due to the need to work, then Yes - you can combine the work and recoup some of the costs of the processor.

16-core Ryzen 9 3950X will be priced 749 USD - $46.81 per core
12-core Ryzen 9 3900X will be priced 499 USD - $41.58 per core
8-core Ryzen 7 3800X will be priced 399 USD - $49.88 per core
8-core Ryzen 7 3700X will be priced 329 USD - $41.13 per core
6-core Ryzen 5 3600X will be priced 249 USD - $41.50 per core
6-core Ryzen 5 3600 will be priced 199 USD - $33.17 per core

So, the best buy for the money apparantly is Ryzen 5 3600, if you want more cores - Ryzen 7 3700X or Ryzen 9 3900X. The worst buy is Ryzen 7 3800X, followed by Ryzen 9 3950X.

Ryzen are certainly excellent processors, but better than Intela, nothing is there yet. So it's better to take what is checked. And for budget assemblies there it is already necessary to look for tests in youtube or here on the forum.

Preliminary benchmarks of Ryzen 3XXX show that they just wreck Intel CPUs.

When it comes to cryptonight you will want to have 2mb l3 cache per thread  and with new 3000 series we get double from previous ryzens so we can use all the threads on the cpu hopefully..

Ryzen 1st / 2nd we had 16mb l3 cache = 8 threads to use so this new generation will be intresting to see what we can get.
Almost certain will atleast outperform polaris.

Thanks for sharing this. What is your hashrate on cn with these settings? Did you oc'ed your cpu?

Not sure the price / hash ratio will be better on the new TRs.

I believe at least threadripple will more than 20% efficient compared with ryzen to produce the hashrate but again CPU will never be profitable to be used to mine crypto. I have seen the latest benchmark of the CPU comparison to mine XMR and they are all giving the worst result.
Even XEON still get a lost.

CN soft shell already is ok for CPUs, and random X will be much more CPU oriented.

Ofcourse CPU-mining can be profitable,  atleast it can pay for itself if you buy a decent cpu  also monero isnt the only algo that you can mine.

Its a win win situation.

You will pay a premium for Threadripper to get 4 channel memory. Whether that premium is worth it depends
on how much the algo benefits from higher main memory bandwidth. Otherwise with the same number of
threads and same cache size you should get the same performance. I think Ryzen is more cost effective.

If AMD could improve their AVX2 performance they would blow Intel out of the water on every point.

Even i never tried but we need to see some results because one of my friends suggested me about this AMD Ryzen, but when it comes to cost it seems the price of this AMD Ryzen is little high according to based on the hash rate.

Any known hashrate for the new Ryzens?

I have ordered a R5 3600 so i will prob have results by friday.

I'm really curious to see the hashrate of Ryzen 3700
I used to mine with a Ryzen 1700 and I paid the costs with mining XMR on my old rigs

I have been checking reviews from tech websites and tech tuber for benchmarks and reviews of the new Ryzen, but I have yet to see a hashrate for it. They have only tested these processors for gaming and productivity as this there the real world case scenarios for its usage. Though I still want to see how these processors compare from the mining standpoint as if you but lets say a 12 or 16 core mainstream CPU, you will not be able to use all of its cores in simple tasks. So if in any case using you PC while mining could be a good option.

Just finished a build and a stream using the Ryzen 7 Gen 3 3700x and the new 5700 XT. Bottom line, no real kernels in place for the 5700XT (RDNA architecture), might be a week or so for that, but the Ryzen 3700+ got 1252h on Bittube and benches at 4152h on MoneroX test. Working to get it running with Monero_R now, will fire up the stream tomorrow if we are able to get it working.

Twitch Channel: Bitsbetrippin
YouTube Channel: Bitsbetrippin

Recap tomorrow morning on youtube on all results to date.

Can you try PhoenixMiner with -clKernel 0 on the 5700XT GPU?

Any update? :)

Still waiting for my 3600.

Why?

I have

The 1800x
The 2700x

And the threadripper 1920x

I have the 3900x on order.

I am pretty sure it will crush the 1920x mining XMR

It has a very big catch.
When it comes I will post it here.

https://old.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/ca8kvy/ryzen_3000_series_benchmarks/ 

Hey philip could you check your  randomX benchmark for 1920x ,  myself i seem to get around 6300-6400h/s  for my TR..

Any more then 12 threads and i get lower hashrates.

I've ordered 3700X, will post results when I get it.

EDIT: Found some results: https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/ccfdl2/zen2_current_cryptonight_benchmarks_3700x/

Yeah. 3rd gen Ryzen amazing ;D. Pretty much 3600 or 3900x  for RandomX  are the sweet spot. Not saying 3700X is bad, but dollar/hash  its  3600 or 3900X thats the top choice.

Some RandomX Benchmarks:

RYZEN 9 3900X ~ 12326 H/s (https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFRkWlJVRkJQVDA9)
THREADRIPPER 1950X ~ 8235 H/s (https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFhkRlFRPT0=)
RYZEN 7 2700 ~ 4713 H/s (https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFRkSlFVRkJQVDA9)

Wow, it's really amazing the hashrate of 3900x
I used to have some rigs with Ryzen 1700 and it was easy to pay for them mining XMR, and now I'm curious to see XMR with this new algo

You just go to this github page and download and extract the folder https://github.com/tevador/RandomX/releases/tag/v1.0.4 (https://github.com/tevador/RandomX/releases/tag/v1.0.4)

Then you open up command window in windows and write in cd/User/yourusername/Downloads/RandomX-benchmark-windows-x64-v1.0.4

then you write in randomx-benchmark.exe --help    and you will get up diffrent parameters you can use for example threads largepages etc

Supported options:
  --help        shows this message
  --mine        mining mode: 2080 MiB
  --verify      verification mode: 256 MiB
  --jit         x86-64 JIT compiled mode (default: interpreter)
  --largePages  use large pages
  --softAes     use software AES (default: x86 AES-NI)
  --threads T   use T threads (default: 1)
  --affinity A  thread affinity bitmask (default: 0)
  --init Q      initialize dataset with Q threads (default: 1)
  --nonces N    run N nonces (default: 1000)
  --seed S      seed for cache initialization (default: 0)

for example Ryzen 5 1600 can write in parameters like:


If you dont got largePages enabled just do this:

To enable the lock pages in memory option
On the Start menu, click Run. In the Open box, type gpedit.msc.

On the Local Group Policy Editor console, expand Computer Configuration, and then expand Windows Settings.

Expand Security Settings, and then expand Local Policies.

Select the User Rights Assignment folder.

The policies will be displayed in the details pane.

In the pane, double-click Lock pages in memory.

In the Local Security Setting - Lock pages in memory dialog box, click Add User or Group.

Also if you got windows 10 home you wont have it by default but will have to do a workaround.

Anyone test AVX2? Any algo with Lyra2 is good for testing as it has both AVX2 and SSE2 versions.
AVX2 on  Ryzen 1xxx is slower than SSE2.

I have tested the Ryzen 5 3600 and with all 12 threads i was getting around 6100h/s this with msi b450m gaming and 2x4gb cheap 2666 memory. Algo: RandomX benchmark.

Pretty much expected, half of the 3900x hashrate.

I have a rig that is using windows10+Phoenix miner with single RadeonVII mining Ethereum. I wanted to see if I can replace the CPU with the 3900 and mine XMR as well. Would that make sense ? Currently it has a i3 + LGA 1151 motherboard. I understand I need to replace CPU/Mobo and RAM.
I can't increase number of Rigs. Just want to see I can expand by putting CPU mining along with existing GPU mining.
Thanks for help.

Totally possible to mine GPU + CPUs, but you have to do the math, because you'll have to buy the CPU + motherboard

I used to mine with CPUs + GPUs but I build the rig with Ryzen at the beginning

I wonder if I need to get RAM as well. currently the rig using a 4GB RAM.
I am trying to expand. Just that I don't have capacity for more GPUs

The use of ram will increase but not so much
I don't think it's worth to change motherboard and cpu if you already have the rigs
You can start a new rig with ryzen, it's easier this way

You definitely need more RAM with a 8C/16T CPU, especially if you want to mine with it.
I recommend 512MB per thread to handle the most memory hard algos.

I tested RandomX on Ryzen 2600 (ASRock B450 Steel Legend + 2x8Gb@3200) and get hashrate 2000h/s. Strange result if we take into account your data. I choose 6 or 12 threads - there are no differences in the hashrate. I doubt that such a great progress was made by the change of the technological process.
Who else has the results for 2600?

More then 4gb ram for first/second gen is not necessery.

For example my Ryzen 5 1600s  do around 3500h/s on RandomX.  DDR4 memory is limited to about 4000-6000 H/s per channel (depending on frequency and timings)

I belive you havent enabled largePages because then your hashrate should be 3500+

your test file should look like: 
The high increase in hashrate for this generation is the higher cache which lets us utilize all the threads we like.

Yes, indeed, applying a new local policy for "Lock pages in memory" and in the test received 3650 h/s. Waiting for July 24, and to move Loki to RandomX algorithm.

Ryzen 2600 6 threads = 1220 h/s on yespowerr16 algo (Yenten coin)
ram: 2xddr4 3200
cooler: box


Ryzen 3 2200G 3 threads = 523 h/s

Ryzen 5 2600 running at 3,4GHz

randomx-benchmark.exe --mine --jit --largePages --threads 6 --init 6 --nonces 300000

Performance: 3630 h/s

test bench:
Asus TUF B450
Memory 2 x 4Gb @ 2133 MHz 

Did a pre-order for Ryzen 9 3900x. What mobo/RAM is suggested?

Sounds about fight!
If possible would be nice IF you could redo benchmark with just one stick of The ram.

Actual/real hashrate R5 2600 (no o/c) on the algorithm of RandomX (rx/Loki) is 3000 +/-10 h/s. Mine started right after the Loki fork and change the algorithm on RandomX.
I ask the others to confirm the hashrate.
P.S. Miner - xmrig 2.99.0

ryzen 5 1600 @ 3.6ghz with 3200ddr4 16-17-17-1T is doing 3800h/s rx/Loki. (asus x370-f gaming)

Anyone knows the new Ryzen 3900x which is said to be better than Intel 9900k and with a much better starting price. It seems AMD have taken the lead now and Intel is not responding at all until now.I think the hashrate should be very good feom this new Ryzen processor.

3900x you are looking at 12000+ h/s on random and 1500+ on CryptonightR

Its twice performance on Ryzen 5 3600.  All new ryzen are truly beasts.

Indeed, third ryzen generation are even more efficient than EPYC.
On RandomX, EPYC 7351 ~10100 H/s (https://randomx.monerobenchmarks.info/shareExportCPU.php?s=VFhwWlFrRkJQVDA9) 

Theoretically, that should give me about half the hashrate.
I tried it and it did not work.  It threw an error and told me to enable large pages.
Interestingly, I was able to cpu-mine Monero at the same hashrate as before - 460 H/s with 7 threads (XMR-Stak 2.10.6).

3950X maybe will launch on September 30, looking forward to see its hashrate.

I suppose it will be about same as 3600 vs 3700x

with that i mean we are still limited to dual channel memory and  with RandomX you can get around 4-6k per channel ddr4

How much more into that 3rd Generation Ryzen 3000 series? specially that threadripper. Intel i9 is cheaper though but you cant get wrong with that 3rd gen Ryzen.

"Tom" has an interesting arcticle about how Ryzen 3xxx achieved it's single thread performance and why
many users claim it fails to achieve its adverstised boost frequency.

In short they loosened their binning specs and typically have only one core that can achieve the
the boost rate. It's up to the OS to make sure lightly threaded applications always use the golden core.

It is rumoured Intel will dramatically cut the prices of Cascade Lake X to better compete with Threadripper 3.
If so they'll likeky cut the prices of the existing masinstream line as well.

From a CPU mining perspective it still looks like Ryzen has the edge. Ryzen's failings, particularly slow AVX2
and lack of AVX512, mostly affect algos that are now dominated by ASICs. AMD likely has room to cut prices
to respond to anything Intel does.

AMD said it will launch in November, RandomX is also delayed - November 30.  :-[

Just upgraded a Ryzen 7 1700 to a Ryzen 9 3900X.

What a beast. Cryptonight R went from 480-490 H/s to 1500 H/s.

Yeah my 2   ryzen 9 3900x   do 1398 and 1475 on cryptonight

These pc's  will run a pair of evga's 1660 each  and while they are not making a fortune I have yet to use my heat this fall.  So they are pretty good as space heating units.

It definitely is. Wait for the November algorithm change and see this beast mining XMR like crazy.
I am still rocking R7 1700 and Vega 56 in my workstation rig.
Vega 56 does 2100 H/s with SBR miner and Ryzen 7 does 510 H/s (3.85 GHz OC - all cores @1.23v)

Less can be more. Optimal number of threads, for me, is 22. 24 give less hashrate. In the end of the day, I lowered to 21, it just looses 50 h/s, and it runs a bit cooler.

I'm using DDR4-3477, tought.

Yes, I just benched it and it does > 10 kH/s...

However, it'll be a severe blow to my 2 vegas and 4 Ellesmere's. I don't know what to mine with them after this fork...

3900x runs a bit hot using the retail cooler. It goes up to 85ºC, guess it could be a lot better. That's with the case open and ~20ºC ambient temperature.

Water cooling is almost a must if you intend to mine. I have a 1700 with stock cooler and a box
fan blowing through the open case, and it still gets over 80C on some algos.

In other news...

The market is about to be shaken up with Intel's Cascade Lake X with huge price drops.
Way-to-go AMD for putting the screws to Intel!

Some points of interest...

AMD agressively pushing 7nm has had some issues with yield and consistency.

Intel sticking with 14nm limits improvements but maturity should bring reliability.

Cascade Lake X will br priced to compete with Ryzen 3000 series.

Ryzen, with the bigger cache, is better suited to mining CPU algos.

Cascade Lake X with AVX512 will only improve algos that have already lost the race to
GPUs or ASICs.

Limted supplies may keep AMD from lowering the price of Ryzen3 but they may be loading
up for the next Threadripper.

What else might Intel be holding back to respond?

This is exciting.

i got 3 3900x rigs and 1 3700x

i got some of the noctua coolers the huge sink dual fans at 1.3v or higer they cannot handle the heat to get above 13000h/s so i think you are right u need water cooling. anyone know of a good water cooler for my next build?

Evga two fan.    120mm 65c

Corsair two fan 140mm 58c

Look for sales .

The Corsair is impressive.

I use ram clocked to 2666 it does 3000 stock

Both builds use 32gb ram.

H110i? H115i?

Wow. Just wow. Liquid cooling is definitely the way to go with Ryzen 9.

I was not confortable with that 85ºc CPU temp, so I picked up a AIO CoolerMaster Masterliquid 240.
Temps went from 85ºc to 63ºc and clock speed was up to 4,14 Ghz with 21 threads running.

Very surprised with the Masterliquid 240 (not lite, not pro). Amazing performance for what it costed.

hmm thx i was told by micocenter reps a two fan liquid wonnt beat a two fan top of line noctua
they said u need a three fan but they cost like $250 no way.

i get 12500 on one of my 3900x boxes woth 84 temps tho with the $89 noct

Then again you get pump failures, leaking etc on water cooling. Then you gotta ask yourselfs are the extra 500h/s worth it.

its more about lower temps, i do 12300 but the temps are around 83 degrees

Yea thats some bad temps for sure. is 1.3v the lowest you can go? 

Well i guess another reason to go with the r5 3600s .

No need water cooling for 3900x. I used one Thermalright 140 with two fans, and one with stock cooler but with a $10 fan pointing at the rig. Both of them are around 12k at around 70c. I set the cpus running at 4G around 1.2v.

Of course it's not "needed". Even with air cooling it's running within spec.

But I definitely feel more confortable with 62-63ºC with all cores @ 4.14/4.166 Ghz.

And this with a water cooler that's cheaper than the high-end air coolers.

It depends on the algo, most algos favourable to CPUs run relatively cool because they often stall
waiting for memory. If you want to see how hot it can get try sha256d.

Of course. But here I'm making a before and after comparison.

Mining Monero running 21 threads
Stock cooler (Wraith Prism) - 84-85ºC @ 3.99 Ghz
Masterliquid 240 - 62-63ºC @ 4.166 Ghz.

a huge fan cooler is okay in an open rig.

but water 💦 💧 cooling works well in cases.

they don't leak if you buy all in one models.

they are quiet and truly are good space heater rigs.

i have three ryzen 9/3900x rigs now.

My point is don't engineer your cooling solution based on one algo
that can't even use all threads.

sha256d is a good thermal stress test.

More RAM better performance?  I'm running two 9 3900xs with 8GB getting around 10,000 kH.

No you just need dual channel. Its all about timinings...hitting 13.5k with customs timings on shitty ram, and over 14k with decent ram, with total system power around 130 watts at the wall and 65c CPU temps.

How do you do that, how do you know what timings to use?  I should say I'm hitting 10k on Random XL loki.