|
Iamtutut
|
 |
May 18, 2018, 06:45:21 PM |
|
Ryzen 5 2400G in auto config with jce_cn_cpu_miner.027
Cryptonight V7: 170H/s max
Cryptonoght heavy: 85H/s max
Impossible to mine with the Vega IGP for the moment. A shame considering my mobo could divert 16GB DDR4 to the Vega 11 cores.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin mining is now a specialized and very risky industry, just like gold mining. Amateur miners are unlikely to make much money, and may even lose money. Bitcoin is much more than just mining, though!
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
s0ftcorn
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 0
|
|
May 18, 2018, 07:24:47 PM |
|
R5 1500x Cn7 8 threads : 400-450 H/s
R5 1500x CnHeavy 8 threads : 140-190 H/s
R5 1500x CnHeavy 4 threads : 250-290 H/S
R5 2600 Cn7 6 threads : 500-550 H/s
R5 2600 CnHeavy 6 threads : 200-220 H/S
R5 2600 CnHeavy 12 threads : 120-140 H/S
R5 2600 CnHeavy 4 threads : 280-300 H/S
R5 2600 CnHeavy 8 threads : 160-190 H/S
result on 2600 are a bit weird with CnHeavy
Thats because CN Heavy uses double the amount of Cache, so if all cores use the full amount of cache it gets "overloaded". With JCE you can config so some cores share the cache. CN Light on the other hand uses half the amount of cache, so you i got 2,2KH/s on my 2700X |
|
|
|
|
Set Ready Go
Member
Offline
Activity: 273
Merit: 17
|
Ryzen 5 2400G in auto config with jce_cn_cpu_miner.027
Cryptonight V7: 170H/s max
Cryptonoght heavy: 85H/s max
Impossible to mine with the Vega IGP for the moment. A shame considering my mobo could divert 16GB DDR4 to the Vega 11 cores.
Could you try your 2400G with the new 18.5.1 drivers. |
|
|
|
|
|
Iamtutut
|
|
May 24, 2018, 10:28:11 AM |
|
Ryzen 5 2400G in auto config with jce_cn_cpu_miner.027
Cryptonight V7: 170H/s max
Cryptonoght heavy: 85H/s max
Impossible to mine with the Vega IGP for the moment. A shame considering my mobo could divert 16GB DDR4 to the Vega 11 cores.
Could you try your 2400G with the new 18.5.1 drivers. Tried with the 2018 Q2, because of my bios mod I have a code 43 error. So can't mine with (it's my GPUs or vega core). ATIkmdag 1.4.7 is ineffective with win 10 X64 build 1803, so I have to revert to 18.3.4 drivers and disable the Vega core in my mobo bios. Annoying, very annoying. |
|
|
|
|
|
dragonmike
|
|
May 24, 2018, 10:56:34 AM |
|
ATIkmdag 1.4.7 is ineffective with win 10 X64 build 1803 Can you detail that a bit please? Ineffective for which GPU & which driver? I've updated one of my my RX 570 rigs to Win10 1803, using the latest Adrenalin driver and I was able to patch the bios flashed GPUs with ATIkmdag... On my Vega rig I was able to flash the 56 to 64 bios a while ago without Win10 complaining or throwing off error 43's. Wouldn't want 1803 to jopardise that... |
|
|
|
|
|
Iamtutut
|
|
May 24, 2018, 11:05:35 AM |
|
ATIkmdag 1.4.7 is ineffective with win 10 X64 build 1803 Can you detail that a bit please? Ineffective for which GPU & which driver? I've updated one of my my RX 570 rigs to Win10 1803, using the latest Adrenalin driver and I was able to patch the bios flashed GPUs with ATIkmdag... On my Vega rig I was able to flash the 56 to 64 bios a while ago without Win10 complaining or throwing off error 43's. Wouldn't want 1803 to jopardise that... GPUs: 3X RX570 all from different manufacturers, 1 has Samsung mem, the 2 others have Elpida/Hynix. OS: win 10 build 1803 X64 What I do: DDU drivers, restart with basic windows 10 video driver. Install Adrenalin drivers then apply ATIkmdag without reboot. Then restart. It works with Adrenalin 18.3.4. But with Q2 driver, only the Vega cores of the 2400G are properly setup, all RX 570s have a code 43 error. With 1803 build, I can't use atiwinflash 2.77, several people have reported the same issue. |
|
|
|
|
jpouza
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1109
|
|
May 24, 2018, 11:11:32 AM |
|
X399 chipset
Ryzen Threadripper 1920x @ 4GHz / mem@3466MHz
CN7 with NH Legacy miner 1.9.0.2, all cores = 900-1050H/s
|
|
|
|
|
|
dragonmike
|
|
May 24, 2018, 11:34:57 AM |
|
ATIkmdag 1.4.7 is ineffective with win 10 X64 build 1803 Can you detail that a bit please? Ineffective for which GPU & which driver? I've updated one of my my RX 570 rigs to Win10 1803, using the latest Adrenalin driver and I was able to patch the bios flashed GPUs with ATIkmdag... On my Vega rig I was able to flash the 56 to 64 bios a while ago without Win10 complaining or throwing off error 43's. Wouldn't want 1803 to jopardise that... GPUs: 3X RX570 all from different manufacturers, 1 has Samsung mem, the 2 others have Elpida/Hynix. OS: win 10 build 1803 X64 What I do: DDU drivers, restart with basic windows 10 video driver. Install Adrenalin drivers then apply ATIkmdag without reboot. Then restart. It works with Adrenalin 18.3.4. But with Q2 driver, only the Vega cores of the 2400G are properly setup, all RX 570s have a code 43 error. With 1803 build, I can't use atiwinflash 2.77, several people have reported the same issue. I basically did the same as you (except I have an Intel CPU) as the 1803 update just decided to install its own video drivers and flattened my previous install. I didn't use DDU, just installed the latest Adrenalin driver and ran the pixel patcher. The RX570's got patched properly. No more Error 43... I wonder if the Vega cores of the 2400G are messing up the pixel patcher for you. |
|
|
|
|
|
Iamtutut
|
|
May 24, 2018, 04:28:05 PM |
|
ATIkmdag 1.4.7 is ineffective with win 10 X64 build 1803 Can you detail that a bit please? Ineffective for which GPU & which driver? I've updated one of my my RX 570 rigs to Win10 1803, using the latest Adrenalin driver and I was able to patch the bios flashed GPUs with ATIkmdag... On my Vega rig I was able to flash the 56 to 64 bios a while ago without Win10 complaining or throwing off error 43's. Wouldn't want 1803 to jopardise that... GPUs: 3X RX570 all from different manufacturers, 1 has Samsung mem, the 2 others have Elpida/Hynix. OS: win 10 build 1803 X64 What I do: DDU drivers, restart with basic windows 10 video driver. Install Adrenalin drivers then apply ATIkmdag without reboot. Then restart. It works with Adrenalin 18.3.4. But with Q2 driver, only the Vega cores of the 2400G are properly setup, all RX 570s have a code 43 error. With 1803 build, I can't use atiwinflash 2.77, several people have reported the same issue. I basically did the same as you (except I have an Intel CPU) as the 1803 update just decided to install its own video drivers and flattened my previous install. I didn't use DDU, just installed the latest Adrenalin driver and ran the pixel patcher. The RX570's got patched properly. No more Error 43... I wonder if the Vega cores of the 2400G are messing up the pixel patcher for you. That's simple, the way things are now, I either can use the Vega cores, or the RX 570s. And almost no miner seems to work with the Vega 11 cores. |
|
|
|
|
karim_hassan777
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
|
|
May 24, 2018, 07:55:29 PM |
|
can any one give me a link for ati pixcel patcher 1.4.7 because i only find 1.4.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iamtutut
|
|
May 24, 2018, 07:59:46 PM |
|
can any one give me a link for ati pixcel patcher 1.4.7 because i only find 1.4.6
Up to this date, there is no 1.4.7 |
|
|
|
|
HansHagberg
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 58
Merit: 4
|
|
May 25, 2018, 10:24:34 AM |
|
Getting ~660 h/s with Ryzen 2600X on stock setting for CN7
|
|
|
|
|
Set Ready Go
Member
Offline
Activity: 273
Merit: 17
|
|
May 26, 2018, 05:47:51 PM |
|
Getting ~660 h/s with Ryzen 2600X on stock setting for CN7
Sounds nice. What ram speed and miner are you using? |
|
|
|
|
danskin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
May 29, 2018, 04:33:06 PM |
|
How do you guys mine with both the CPU and iGPU on the Ryzen 2 series?
For those who use XMRig, do you run the CPU / GPU miner separately?
|
|
|
|
|
Balanca
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
June 26, 2018, 06:06:06 AM |
|
Getting ~520 h/s with Ryzen 7 1800X, motherboard MSI B350M PRO-VDH on stock settings for CN7
|
|
|
|
|
untore
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
June 27, 2018, 08:50:16 AM |
|
ryzen 1700@3.6GHz560H/s cn-0/1 8T 1080H/s cn-msr 8T 280H/s cn-xao 8T 240H/s cn-heavy/xhv 4T 2080Hs/ cn-lite 16T 350KH/s cn-bbr (Boolberry variant) 8T Boolberry variant only tested with the reference CPUminer fork. If implemented on xmrig maybe it could reach 500KH/s? Any other algos worth testing? There aren't many asic resitant algos out there, and probably the ones that claim someone is mining with some unannaunced asic/fpga anyway; The steady drop in XMR price is probably due to the fact that the algo fork was not effective enough to deter asic mining completely and they have just been dumping more slowly over the months. Probably asic resistance should be implemented in the p2p protocol and not in the hashing algo, but I am not an expert. |
|
|
|
|
sergey1301
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 1
|
|
July 06, 2018, 03:05:36 PM |
|
What software is better to use for mine? How many hashes can amd risen 3 1200 issue? I read that on risen 5 1600 you can get 500 hashes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iamtutut
|
|
July 06, 2018, 04:10:37 PM |
|
JCE CN miner works very fine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tidsdilatation
|
|
July 06, 2018, 06:04:41 PM |
|
I have gotten myself a Ryzen 1800x with watercooling for my gaming PC. When i use my GPU which is a 1080ti to mine with, i also use the CPU to mine cryptonight-heavy algorithm. A 1800x gets around 180-190 hashes per second. It is a little bit low, and almost not worth it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
togoshigekata
|
|
July 07, 2018, 02:20:47 PM
Last edit: July 07, 2018, 04:22:07 PM by togoshigekata |
|
Ryzen 7 1700 is getting me 1,000+ BBP per day ($3/day)
and I feel good contributing to Cancer/Disease Research
I paid $700 for all of the computer parts for the machine I now get about 880 BBP (BiblePay) per day, at $0.0015 per BBP that is $1.32/day (19 Month ROI) at $0.0025 per BBP that is $2.20/day (11 Month ROI) at $0.0035 per BBP that is $3.08/day (8 Month ROI) BiblePay price has been lower recently |
|
|
|
|
