@GeorgeJohn needs to weigh up how much longer they want to be in denial Vs how many more investigators will come in and pick through their prior post history.
I did not really delve into the details of the publications of these two accounts, but the fact that there is a similarity is noticeable.
Both write posts with little to no capitalization or punctuation marks. Their entire post can be merged into one sentence. I remember that I once suggested to GeorgeJohn to check his punctuation more closely. But unfortunately, he did not quite understand what I meant.
For example. The sentence is not delimited by a dot.
|
|
|
|
I see that JGood has started to leave red tags to everyone in a row, and it doesn't bother me at all as long as he does it with an open mind. Therefore, I want to check whether he will mark those who deserve it or ignore this thread?
The facts of this case:2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue)
1. GeorgeJohn
2. EbedeProof:[snip]Miscellaneous:If you look on their applications Ebede was send earlier before Georgejohn so the person controlled both of this accounts are hurry up when he want to drop the application of the bounties. Both of the accounts already deleted their applications, Ebede was known promoting scam casino 1xbit. Even both of the accounts doesn't cheat a bounty or signature campaign, it's worth to note he's greedy promoting scam sites with alt accounts to make a lot money. Thank you for understanding that some persons developed enemies with me just like that, and they want my account to be ban, which i don't know their reason, yes of course i know the know vividly the owner of ebede account, and it's my course mate in University, the same course and the same department, and i introduced him to bitcointalk community then before we separated, the ebede normally use my system to do almost his academic work both graphics design and other works, so on that day of April fool he used my laptop to login bitcointalk community, before i could notice he has dropped a Post that contains all my information..so when i noticed i deleted it. I'm not denying the fact that i don't know the user ebede i know him in person and is a course mate. I want to know if i will be penalize because of a newbie mistake using my laptop do work. I know many some people want to kick me out from bestchange signature campaign i join.
Challenge accepted. 1 Using Delta symbol to list an item, how can you prefer to choose Delta symbol while this forum had insert list BBcode or you could use number / alphabet list. ∆ understanding
∆ observation
∆ passion to overcome issues
∆ Through Twitter publication
∆ Through Telegram publication
∆ Through Instagram publication
∆ Through Facebook publication
∆ Through newspaper publication
∆ Through Television such as BBC's and satellite
2 Very like to create multiple unnecessary thread about forum rules, rank, quality post, motivation, guideline seeking for merit. You're a newbie why you guiding to newbie too? The quality of our work attracts good response and also make us not to be fearful, because the first time I login my account I was unable to understand the forum because I don't know the direction to follow untill i observed these group, despite that am not too good to understand everything in the group now but believing that with time i will follow up, but the little research i made i understand that good quality contributes for the growth of user, and also reading of work like twice before posting also create good impact of quality post.
I understand that many starters in forum their primary concerns is to ranked up without knowing the criteria of the group or forum, I think many people are once a newbie before getting to certain position, I think what should help all new members is to study the environment first before looking for uplift, understanding the rules and regulations of these honourable forum perfectly and it will enable us beginner's to create a positive solution's in future through the community.
making a quality post
Making a quality post does not required long paragraph, it's based on how meaningful the work is, so write a post especially newbie like me, I think we have to pass through processes, which is adequate research, observation and something that are different from the work of others.
From my observation I foun that most of the topic in Bitcointalk community we discuss today has already been treated, discussed for long time. People framed or interchange the words in a modern form.
A quality post :are one of the major criteria to earn merit and well recognize to the forum, a beginners most know how to make a quality post both from local board and public board, because good quality of post attracts a campaign to hire a member and to be merited.
Beginners are conscious to ranked up in the forum without proper research and observation and hardworking. Hardworking is the activation energy of begginers to make quality post without obstruction. A begginer most follow the full steps of the seniors like the following @suchmoon,@ loycev,@welsh, @loyce777, @ upgrade. And other members who are highly intellectual in order to propagate. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5262255.msg54797349#msg54797349A quality post is a post that is answerable to a question, and also a post that brings a solution to a question even though it's a two lines stanza of an article that's well arranged, coordinated, constructed, understandable and also meaningful, but from my perspective some user's misunderstood what we meant by a quality post or a quality article, i have come across of some varieties of post's in the community and it trigger's me to put it in writing, i seen some user's making an ambiguous articles And taught that a large numbers of articles is granted or guarantee making of a tangible or nice post, [No]
This is what you called you and @Ebede are different body? |
|
|
|
|
16 days have passed but Ratimov ignores this thread with all his might.
|
|
|
|
Fix your fucking quote before you get banned for plagiarism. It would be immensely amusing but I'm really tired of this sockpuppeting shit-stiring drama.
Thanks for pointing that out, I really did accidentally make a mistake. |
|
|
|
I'll just leave it here for reflection  I don't trust Ratimov because: 1. There is no more egregious case of text-spinning with the help of Google translator than the case of Ratimov. —if Ratimov did not deny in principle, that publishing something in the form in which he publishes it is a bad example.
—if Ratimov had not chosen to reply with an ad hominem attack against an accusation brought with evidence.
2. Constantly demonstrates extremely arrogant and devil-may-care attitude towards the community, he deleted posts but there is an archive. Thanks to RapTarX, suchmoon, icopress, The Pharmacist, Poker Player for constructive answers ON THEME. The rest of the speculation and blah blah are not interesting to me.
3. Ratimov is an inveterate liar who publishes deliberately false facts. Ratimov: More than 8 months have passed between these cases, where is the connection? Your saying would be true if I created a topic about airfinex a few days after he accused me.The Pharmacist: The timing says it all, IMO, and I'm talking about the timing between airfinex's post here and the creation of this thread.LoyceV: Just last week, airfinex posted in "~", which you responded to several times. The 8 months are irrelevant, you posted this just half an hour before you created this topic:
4. Ratimov regularly resorts to mutual exclusion on the basis of revenge, eddie13, DireWolfM14 expressed his opinion and he added him to the list of distrust. 3000+ merits for using Google translate eh? What a great method of distributing DT voting power ..
 To me this looks like a blatant attempt to attack some one who called you out. I know you've developed a few supporters here, but I suspect that they too will cease their support if you keep making these obvious retaliatory attacks. Deflection and "What-About-ism" doesn't absolve you of your sins.
5. Using feedback as a weapon, Ratimov clearly shows how far he is from understanding the foundations of the trust system. Stop trying to discredit those who allege that you're a plagiarist. The most delusional thing that can be said about this. What does this have to do with it? I got the same impression. The feedback you left airfinex doesn't help either: this looks more like a personal attack than anything based on facts:  When I read feedback like this, it makes whoever wrote it look bad, not whoever received it. (~~~) As for his accusation, if I wanted some kind of revenge, I would put him a negative trust. That would be very obvious Trust abuse. (~~~) You are incapable of defending yourself, which is why you attack those who accuse you of plagiarism.Stop deflecting, address your problems head on. It's the only way to resolve them. To me it seems like a weakness to try to defame the person who made some valid arguments. I still think the plagiarism rules should be adjusted, this shouldn't be allowed (see my reasons why). Big surprise: the guy who first posted about Ratimov's plagiarism received negative feedback the next day:  I can't help but think Ratimov was angry when he tagged those users. Here's another " brain-dead fucker". I don't know why Ratimov left them negative feedback in English, because I can't read the Russian Reference links. I see one very strong connection though: they've criticized Ratimov, so he tags them. And then you wonder why people use alt accounts? Allow me to quote myself: Be the bigger man!With great power comes great responsibility ( source unknown). Especially when you're on DefaultTrust (or if you want to be on DefaultTrust in the future), you shouldn't (ab)use that power by leaving (negative) feedback when someone does something you don't like. Your Sent feedback is what others use to judge your judgement.If someone on the internet is mean to you: boo fucking hoo! Use the Ignore button, and forget about them. |
|
|
|
I missed the discussion in which Ratimov was caught in a lie, after which he removed his thread, but nothing. Therefore, for myself, I decided that I want to put an end to all these senseless disputes, and this will happen when Ratimov agrees to the counter terms of the dispute ( a bet that he offered and not me). Here are some topics to search for:
Here he selected a list of 30 threads and offered them for verification, considering me a brainless guy (since, apparently, before his proposal, he checked them for plagiarism). Therefore, I made him a counter offer. A bold statement. I'll give you $5 000 if you can find the source of these threads that I recently created, since you boldly claim that all my threads are translations of other people. You can archive this post, and any trusted member of this community will confirm it.
Even if you really are the author of a couple of threads, then against the background of hundreds of translations you have published, it seems like a drop in the ocean. But so be it, I will accept your offer on the following conditions:
2. I will not rely only on those that you published, I will look for plagiarism in all the threads you created.
3. For everything, as you suggested, a week will be enough for me.
4. If anyone finds plagiarism and publishes evidence before me, that person will receive the award.
5. If I find plagiarism, I will win the bet, but I will send you proofs in PM so that you can correct your mistake.You have the right to refuse the bet, I and everyone present here will understand this, (I hope you haven't lost your courage). He has already publicly refused twice (veiledly changing the topic of conversation) if not, write simply "Agree" or "NO". I want to note that most likely he will begin to find fault with words and write in this thread that the subject of the dispute is not at all what he had in mind, so stock up on popcorn. |
|
|
|
I don't trust Ratimov because: 1. There is no more egregious case of text-spinning with the help of Google translator than the case of Ratimov. —if Ratimov did not deny in principle, that publishing something in the form in which he publishes it is a bad example.
—if Ratimov had not chosen to reply with an ad hominem attack against an accusation brought with evidence.
2. Constantly demonstrates extremely arrogant and devil-may-care attitude towards the community, he deleted posts but there is an archive. Thanks to RapTarX, suchmoon, icopress, The Pharmacist, Poker Player for constructive answers ON THEME. The rest of the speculation and blah blah are not interesting to me.
3. Ratimov is an inveterate liar who publishes deliberately false facts. Ratimov: More than 8 months have passed between these cases, where is the connection? Your saying would be true if I created a topic about airfinex a few days after he accused me.The Pharmacist: The timing says it all, IMO, and I'm talking about the timing between airfinex's post here and the creation of this thread.LoyceV: Just last week, airfinex posted in "~", which you responded to several times. The 8 months are irrelevant, you posted this just half an hour before you created this topic:
4. Ratimov regularly resorts to mutual exclusion on the basis of revenge, eddie13, DireWolfM14 expressed his opinion and he added him to the list of distrust. 3000+ merits for using Google translate eh? What a great method of distributing DT voting power ..
To me this looks like a blatant attempt to attack some one who called you out. I know you've developed a few supporters here, but I suspect that they too will cease their support if you keep making these obvious retaliatory attacks. Deflection and "What-About-ism" doesn't absolve you of your sins.
5. Using feedback as a weapon, Ratimov clearly shows how far he is from understanding the foundations of the trust system. Stop trying to discredit those who allege that you're a plagiarist. The most delusional thing that can be said about this. What does this have to do with it? I got the same impression. The feedback you left airfinex doesn't help either: this looks more like a personal attack than anything based on facts: When I read feedback like this, it makes whoever wrote it look bad, not whoever received it. (~~~) As for his accusation, if I wanted some kind of revenge, I would put him a negative trust. That would be very obvious Trust abuse. (~~~) You are incapable of defending yourself, which is why you attack those who accuse you of plagiarism.Stop deflecting, address your problems head on. It's the only way to resolve them. To me it seems like a weakness to try to defame the person who made some valid arguments. I still think the plagiarism rules should be adjusted, this shouldn't be allowed (see my reasons why). Big surprise: the guy who first posted about Ratimov's plagiarism received negative feedback the next day: I can't help but think Ratimov was angry when he tagged those users. Here's another " brain-dead fucker". I don't know why Ratimov left them negative feedback in English, because I can't read the Russian Reference links. I see one very strong connection though: they've criticized Ratimov, so he tags them. And then you wonder why people use alt accounts? Allow me to quote myself: Be the bigger man!With great power comes great responsibility ( source unknown). Especially when you're on DefaultTrust (or if you want to be on DefaultTrust in the future), you shouldn't (ab)use that power by leaving (negative) feedback when someone does something you don't like. Your Sent feedback is what others use to judge your judgement.If someone on the internet is mean to you: boo fucking hoo! Use the Ignore button, and forget about them. |
|
|
|
(neutral btw, was that negative changed to neutral?).
no, it is more likely that neutral will change to negative than vice versa. This is a threat? Or are you so asserting yourself to others? Whatever it is, one thing is clear, empty chatter is your element in every sense of the word and nothing more (from a gentleman's wager to these threats). |
|
|
|
A bold statement. I'll give you $5 000 if you can find the source of these threads that I recently created, since you boldly claim that all my threads are translations of other people. You can archive this post, and any trusted member of this community will confirm it.
Even if you really are the author of a couple of threads, then against the background of hundreds of translations you have published, it seems like a drop in the ocean. But so be it, I will accept your offer on the following conditions:1. You will use escrow and deposit $ 5,000 to DarkStar_ , Royse777, DireWolfM14 or Nutildah, (I think you will not be charged a commission). 2. I will not rely only on those that you published, I will look for plagiarism in all the threads you created. 3. For everything, as you suggested, a week will be enough for me. 4. If anyone finds plagiarism and publishes evidence before me, that person will receive the award. 5. If I find plagiarism, I will win the bet, but I will send you proofs in PM so that you can correct your mistake. You have the right to refuse the bet, I and everyone present here will understand this, (I hope you haven't lost your courage). Marcel, Marie. |
|
|
|
It's none of your business why I'm using an alternate account, so enjoy the quote. Marcel, Marie. I don't have a problem with alt accounts as long as they're not used for evading bans. If you're hesitant to say something controversial because you don't want it to be associated with your name, please create an alt account and say it.
|
|
|
|
- All you do is tell us that the "newbie" is to blame for the plagiarism and not you.
- All you do is try to outshine us with your "alleged" achievements instead of appealing
- You did not even deign to mention that in 24 hours you were convicted of plagiarism twice
There is a huge difference between you and another guy who recently filed an appeal, because he admitted his mistake and you did not! And I do not understand what relation to the bitcoin forum is the instruction how to "prohibit adding you to groups" - it is the same if you said that on this forum you learned how to properly wipe your ass. |
|
|
|
Anyways, that an idea right there for the OP to check "Where to draw the line".
He has a couple of hours until he gets banned, since his idea is only to divert attention. |
|
|
|
Just my two sats and waiting for the best result of Mpamaegbu.
I am one of those people who like to shake the nerves of others, so if Mpamaegbu successfully appeals against the ban and is unbanned, I will provide new evidence since I have something in store. I am such an obnoxious brute only on weekends, on other days I enjoy watching such scandals drinking Piña colada. |
|
|
|
In most countries, stealing is illegal too, but on Bitcointalk, scamming is allowed. The more I think about it, the less it makes sense to ban people for stealing text but not for stealing money.
If people were smarter, they would have realized that the ban for plagiarism stands out in order to maintain the forum in a clean state, since it will be difficult for a scammers to deceive people if the forum turns into a trash heap. |
|
|
|
After I discovered Pokapoka124's plagiarism, he quickly added a link to the source and escaped the ban. But he is indeed a deliberate plagiarist, as evidenced by the second report. The date of the original is dated January 19, 2021, the plagiarism date is January 21, 2021 (no links provided). If you check his message history, you will understand that he forms most of his texts by copying clippings from new sites. PlagiarismUser: Pokapoka124Post link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5311064.msg56145997#msg56145997 ( https://ninjastic.space/topic/5311064) Additional link to third source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/bible-quotation-found-in-bitcoin-block-number-666-666People usually encrypt messages on Bitcoin blockchain through a sent transaction. These messages varies from different individual and organisation records. The first message recorded on Bitcoin blockchain network was in 2009. It was encrypted in the bitcoin blockchain’s genesis block.
Recently a certain biblical message was seen encrypted in a transaction in block number 666,666 of the Bitcoin (BTC) blockchain. The message is a quotation from the sixth book in the New Testament, St.Paul’s epistle to the Romans. It reads: “Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good – Romans 12:21.”
The individual who sent the transaction paid over $50 in fees. This is quite expensive compared to the normal peak average fee on Bitcoin blockchain in a day via bitinfocharts.com records. This shows that the sender’s interest was to have the transaction, and the message, imbedded in block 666,666. Why pay such a high fee just to save a message on the blockchain?
|
|
|
|
Yep, everything is clear. As I said, anyone who understands Croatian and saw Lauda's posts simply doesn't have to guess his gender as everything is obvious. He always used masculine gender when he wrote in Croatian, therefore he wanted to be perceived as a male. As simple as that. But if people like to think that he is she for whatever reason, so be it.
Anyone who thinks Laud is Croat is an idiot. |
|
|
|
We will see..
How long do you anticipate we'll have to wait until we see? The problem is that Ratimov has 400 created threads, and all these threads are translated from other people's articles, just check it out. Therefore, it is impossible to find something in this heap of shit. I do think he's setting a bad example though, and I think plagiarism rules could be improved. So if anything, you may want to focus your energy on adjusting the rules in a separate topic (in Meta). You could use Ratimov as an example for your arguments, but don't make it about him. |
|
|
|
Bestchange is now full again. Welcome  BestChange will have 2 slots tomorrow |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
