Perhaps they are seeing themselves overtaken by the abrupt increase in the number of transactions and that will happen to other platforms established so either face the challenge or another service will take its place, that simple, in the other hand if that is true, what worries is that users can not access when they want to do an operation since it would not be reliable anymore, so users will determine whether it is feasible or not depending on their experience with them.

You are right but do not forget that it is not only about security of the blockchain, but also of the services that operate using this, even BTC has had to endure those reversals, I mean the sites that were hacked in the past, another case, sites with  fraudulent activity  abound and that is a big problem.

That must be for several reasons, but one of them should be because as it is not yet very broad its use, that is to say there are no rows of people waiting to use it, those who installed it have to recover their investment and / or ensure the maintenance of the equipment, besidesanother reason is that since they do not have competitors they still set the charges and keep them elevated.

And would also cause a total revolution in the way of doing business, I really can not imagine a thing of that magnitude, to clarify, I do not say it will happen or not, what I say is that such a thing would present many sudden technical and social challenges whose effects would be very difficult to predict or even to imagine.

That is something that may never be known, I mean like those cases that never resolve, people talk about them even for many years, and new theories begin to emerge from here and there, for example someday  somebody could surely say that  maybe BTC was invented by the aliens, etc.

That's how it is guys, both have rarity and  there is not much availability and if that is added its use, all this creates an increase in demand causing an increase in prices, to this it adds what the OP says:  the elites will try to suppress non-state assets, but won't kill them, even when given a chance.  In the long run, this presents something like a one-way bet for these assets, at current prices.

What happens is that it may continue to be used in parallel, while it is the most widely used and has the security that it offers, there will be faster options and in fact there are, but depending on the use and what is required to do, besides while there is conversion between one and another, so from that premise it might be that BTC  may to have less probabilities that the rest of being replaced.

That sounds right especially when the price seems to be recovering so quickly, however this does not mean that someone should trust that situation for just that, I say it's just to avoid surprises of some kind.

I dont know, it look overpriced before launch, besides the supply is huge, but in any case it must be very good information for those who are interested in that especially for the innovative aspect that it represents,
On the other hand the fact that it is listed there,it is already noticeable.

Maybe, and if some day BTC  becomes to be outdated technology that should not affect too much, unless the transactions took months to be completed which would be apart from uncomfortable boring, but who knows why the opposite might happen too, the fact that it is immutable in supply it does not mean that it will not undergo adjustments in other aspects that might be required in the future to compete with its rivals for calling them in some way, in that case could even become better than gold or lose most of its value in the worst case.

Even unlikely things usually happen, why do I say this?, well because it's not good to take something for granted sometimes, what has been happening so far is that after a fall, the price ends up recovering but nobody really knows how long this trend will continue.

Well, price growth has been surprising, but as I have heard, download the  entire blockchain it is a headache, and there does not seem to be many options available yet, so let's see what happens from here on out.

 If bitcoin price is $10.000, will fiat be worthless?

The question is not well posed because in the event of that happening in the future, giving it  value would then mean that fiat could retain their same value and not less value, everyone will use the best choice for him and about that he/she has at his disposal and obviously it is widely accepted, in this sense the fiat has global acceptance and it must be because it has been more effective so far,  still fiat has more advantages than plastic cards offered by banks in most everyday transactions for the majority of people in the world, but in order not to enter into discord, I will only say that the instruments only seem to be diversifying.

Maybe they just diversified their portfolio and that's why they decided to buy that large amount of silver and much more because it's cheap, at some point the price could skyrocket, but many years may pass from those that have already passed and maybe even some investor could never see the profits in his entire life, for example silver often takes decades to see significant changes in price, perhaps the benefit is for those who trade large quantities of ounces, nobody would think about getting rich with one or two ounces only.

Probably yes, but it would also be logical to think that the increase can be brought about precisely due to the impossibility of that they can make withdrawals of their funds which has led to a sudden drop in offer elsewhere, this coupled with the perspective of confidence that exists to maintain those levels.

I understand your point of view, sounds paradoxical and maybe it is, what happens is that when a thing is disruptive, you do not have much time to stay thinking about this, similar to years or so,of  that way many people see a lot of potential more than paper gold, and is verified in the result of the last years, but yes the risk will always exist, on the contrary when you see that the value of paper over the years sometimes loses its full value sometimes you realize that it is perhaps the worst option  and guides some to other more attractive ways of investment. Maybe that's why some prefer to invest in crypto, I guess.

However once the withdrawals are reactivated, some peoples would think that it would produce a sales volume a little more than usual, mainly due to short-term uncertainty with respect to these new regulations, so I would lower the expectation a little more, in addition, we must not lose sight of the issue of scalability and how it resolves itself.

I do not think everyone is looking for that, there is no way, one only currency across the planet, I do not think it's a good idea, and less that everyone should support that idea, I really do not know what led you to draw that conclusion that would be a good thing, on the other hand I think the price really does matter and depends strictly on the use of each one.

In fact I think you are absolutely right , paper is perhaps the most unsafe way to store value, since it's just a promise, no one guarantees that the one who makes the promise still exists at the moment of wanting to make the exchange in the future,  can also be altered due to humidity, breakage, oversights, running the risk that when presenting it to exchange it can not be accepted given the conditions of the document, definitely not a good choice.

I'm afraid it's not as simple as that, maybe none is as safe as BTC, besides if the majority opted for another alternative, could cause it to stop being popular, on the other hand there is no code or thing that does not need to be perfected or suitable for use, if it were not so maybe we would still use the abacus to count numbers making a comparison in another context.