|
Does it mean no-one uses messaging apps without the use of internet or phone tower connection?
|
|
|
|
valuable info
BSV will be 51% attacked 3 times before bitcoin ever is. Stop quoting r/btc and go back to meta net. If anybody wants to make a wager here that BTC won't be 51% attacked (or SegWit exploited) by the date of your choosing, let me know. It will be a gentleman's wager and I will assuredly hold my end of the bargain or else never post on the forum again. Error correction and implementation of such is not an attack. It is organic, natural and certainly within anyone's right. If an invalid fork has aged 5 minutes, 5 days, 5 months or whatever timeframe does not matter, time does not fix the invalid split, miners do. There can be only one Bitcoin and whatever coin, pi coin, b coin..........Bitcoin is one chain and one chain only as per white paper/copyright. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1062554.msg11396448#msg11396448An error is not an taxable event, tax payment errors however do exit. Currently Bitcoin runs in error mode. It is evident that he correct chain has not been established yet, it is only a matter of time. It is not possible to share the whitepaper across multiple chains. When only one chain carries the bitcoin name and code the correct chain has been established and all systems go. You are just a common troll have no say in the matter unless you are a miner. Common troll have advantages also it instantly reduces everything to an opinion, disqualification from serious advice. |
|
|
|
Guys, I've been reading this crazy stuff posted by someone called "Shelby Moore" (whose messages were recently re-posted in the WO thread by user THX 1138), about how all coins held in SegWit addresses will be donated to miners, as they are free-to-spend coins in the legacy (pre-SegWit) blockchain, and only the coins held in legacy addresses will stay intact and belonging to their owners (private key holders). Supposedly, this attack will occur near the 2020 Halving event and will wreak havoc, resulting in the legacy chain being resurrected from the dead and becoming the dominant one, and the SegWit chain disintegrating into oblivion and causing a massive BTC price drop to near-zero.
What do you make of this?
Some more Qs:
1. Is it possible to move any of our coins held in SegWit addresses to legacy addresses (so that they would belong to the legacy chain if the above attack does happen)? Does the fact that, at some point in their history, those coins were held in SegWit addresses, taint them in any way? Would they still be considered as fully belonging to the legacy chain once moved to legacy addresses?
2. Would you do it? Do you think it's worth it?
3. Do these questions even make any sense?
4. Am I wasting my time with all this?
Thanks for any insights.
1. With the SW exploit segwit coins will be unmovable at first, current transactions, then the coins resting in sw addresses and at last any coin ever moved through a sw address is frozen. Exchanges with coin in SW addresses may become insolvent. 2. Stick to Bitcoin fundamentals, decentralize not follow the herd, flock or mob. Everyone needs to do his own homework. 3. Yes 4. No Core devs know the problems with segwit https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/6qftjc/holy_shit_greg_maxwell_and_peter_todd_both_just/?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=usertext&utm_name=bitcoincashSV&utm_content=t3_dgbb1t
Segregated witnesses separates transaction information about what coins were transferred from the information proving those transfers were legitimate.
The precondition to creating a new block is the data of the last block, the witness.
If you belief to be the 10th owner of a stolen car and the 5th owner has stolen it, when it is established that this is the case you will lose the car and the last lawful owner (4th) will get it back.
This is the very basic rudimentary form of it. |
|
|
|
Does anyone here use ‘Off-the-grid’ chat messenger app that works even without internet connection, using the phone. If so whats the experience and how often you use it. Is it for Group camping, natural disaster situations, when the monthly mobile data plan expired, Mass protest or no internet, on airplane, train or station when you and your friend are not seated together, During a disaster, flood, hurricane, tornado, earthquake and etc Which one you use: Bridgefy https://youtu.be/tWefBK014usFireChat The Serval Mesh (Android only) Briar (Android only) Vojer (iOS only) or other? |
|
|
|
Overpopulation of a developing country is one of its major problem Garbage, Japan old age people diapers about to outsell baby diapers. Lots of virgin up to mid thirties, company is more important as a companion. |
|
|
|
|
LTC over -50% in one month, no development, sagging active wallets for 2 years, no mission, declining transaction for the past halve year......
|
|
|
|
There are several reasons why any decentralized cryptocurrency cannot become a world currency. States and their banks need certain guarantees that the means of payment used will not depreciate sharply. A decentralized cryptocurrency, including bitcoin, just can not give any guarantee to participants in financial relations. For any state, bitcoin is alien, not backed by the authority and obligations of any state. Well, an important role is played by large price volatility and very low possible state control over financial flows in cryptocurrency.
Not good respond from country with bitcoin become legal currency I think why bitcoin con not become global currency for the future, when many country have legal using bitcoin as currency I think bitcoin will be better become global currency payment. I think weakness of bitcoin become global currency with take long term for sending and receiving payment. I think bitcoin will be difficult to legalize as a global currency, high inflation makes people think about that coupled with a sizable transaction fee. I think bitcoin remains a suitable asset for the global market What?, high inflation, Bitcoin does not inflate. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5197106.msg53006960#msg53006960 |
|
|
|
who was talking about miner capitulation?  That is a big raspberry pi, or will that used to mine Bitcoin ? How many average Joe miner will be able to compete with this type of miners? Data-center? |
|
|
|
Satoshi didn't have a 1MB limit in it.
The limit was originally Hal Finney's idea. Both Satoshi and I objected that it wouldn't scale at 1MB. Hal was concerned about a potential DoS attack though, and after discussion, Satoshi agreed. The 1MB limit was there by the time Bitcoin launched. But all 3 of us agreed that 1MB had to be temporary because it would never scale. -Ray Dillinger October 04, 2010 Satoshi explains how to remove the limit:  |
|
|
|
|
The pink unicorn of analog computing, if the thing existed much more serious the would would have to deal with as bitcoin password issues.
|
|
|
|
Hi, Gents,
I think there has to be a way to create a tracking system for bitcoin. Every wallet must contain ids. Otherwise, bitcoin can be always used for money laundering. If you want to launder money, you can find a cash seller everywhere. After bitcoin is bought, noone can prove whose bitcoin it is. I think this is the only think that preventing bitcoin to become a global currency. Do you think it would worth this much if it is trackable. I dont think so. There will be altcoins that work with tracking system and ids. They will become a global currency. Bitcoin? I think never. What do you think?
You confuse BTC with Bitcoin and laundering is only possible when you cash out, blockchain records are "forever". |
|
|
|
|
Sig tells you all about scaling without LN altcoin.
|
|
|
|
|
XRP price is like claiming a piece of string is long, it is some imaginary number, Ripple has manipulated xrp price since day one.
Tax payments for sold xrp does not match supply changes, only a matter of time for legal implications.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
