Hahahaha, this is getting absolutely ridiculous. I know you guys won't believe it until you click the link and see it for yourselves, but yes Martin Armstrong wrote the following: Posted Mar 2, 2020 by Martin Armstrong
These people who always claim the market will crash then claim to have forecast the crash but only one out of 50 such forecasts are ever correct.
They then also market themselves to please buy their newsletter because they were right.
[...]
Yes, I have forecast all the great crashes. That was actually the easy part.
What a gaslighter lmao. |
|
|
|
Doesn't anyone think it's funny how all the people that claim Armstrong saved them never actually post their trades before a market move happens? Always hindsight.
Yes, they've been exposed already, and some of them banned and nuked, tho still resort to sybil attack the thread. That's the point. If they had genuine intentions of helping anybody at all, they would back up their claims with quotes, sources or at least provide examples of their trades. Apparently they have all the time in the world for ad-hominem and baseless promotion of the Socrates service, but they have no time at all for writing a coherent meaningful post which somebody would benefit from. Readers can see that all of the trending Martin Armstrong promoters basically admitted that their goal is to form a circlejerk of Socrates promoters. |
|
|
|
Few reminders: Confidence in Martin Armstrong into the abyssMarty, you've reached your peak, right on schedule of course  @WHATEVERBABY2's pathetic posts were by far the worst shilling attempt to date, which indicates a clear shift in the trend. For really slow people... Title of this thread is Martin Armstrong Discussion.
I suggest click those links for elaborations, and stop attempting to communicate with trolls (i.e. people such as the ones listed above, who never cite anything, provide no refutations and relevant sources at all, but just babble and tell you to subscribe to Socrates). |
|
|
|
 Socrates has been buying gold on the rally for the numbers are the numbers. Of course, these trades were never posted in real-time... But now in hindsight, he's nailing it. Can't lose a single trade. So we're just gonna have to trust him on that one. Or that bad trades are not hidden from that chart. Reminder |
|
|
|
Marty published a new blog with regards to crypto-currencies, so I guess it's time to refresh our memories...  Bitcoin – The End of Cryptocurrencies?
Posted Nov 26, 2018 by Martin Armstrong
COMMENT: Mr. Armstrong; I just wanted to write to say thank you. You saved my marriage. My wife insisted I listen to you because you were right and got me out of gold.
You also got me out of Bitcoin and I cannot thank you enough. [...]
Answer: [...]
A year-end closing below 4150 will point to a drop back to 775 area.
I guess commenter's wife prefers to live in poverty. Lucky guy stumbled upon Marty's advice.  Source: https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/BTC-USD/history?period1=1546128000&period2=1546387200&interval=1d&filter=history&frequency=1dQUESTION #1: [...]
PS: Thank you Socrates. He has traded gold very nicely.
ANSWER:
Even BitCoin was scheduled for a rally into February and it has yet to test the Downtrend Line. Here too, March remains as a Directional Change.
Yeah, how funny, again in hindsight he predicted it   Real-time track record, of course, says otherwise.
Attn: Moderator -- would you please instruct Anonymous Coder and Traxo to stop posting the same thing over and over again. Thank you.
Moderators here don't care that people changed to blind destruction mode Ok this is boring... For really slow people... Title of this thread is Martin Armstrong Discussion.You guys are nothing but Martin Armstrong promoters, shills. Your posts are basically cheap Socrates ads. You do not try to participate in any discussion at all. I invited you numerous times to discuss whatever issue you want, and let us know if we got anything wrong, so that we can correct it or learn more. It's been months and you presented NOTHING. ZERO. ZILCH. NADA. Instead, you resort to ad-hominem and bloating the thread. Again, if there is anything at all you want to refute, do so or kindly stop being a waste of bandwidth and time. Remember to quote sources. However, I'm aware that you wont, because honest people have all the facts on their side. Eagerly waiting for your next posts which I know will again be ad-hominem or whatever other type of spam, instead of attempt to discuss anything relevant at all. |
|
|
|
To keep the thread readable, readers are advised to ignore following 4 users: WHATEVERBABY2 - deceased WHATEVERBABY3 - deceased truth727 - WHATEVERBABY's latest sock m96 over45 DigiLabthey have tried to brainwash you into subscribing to Socrates service, without actually trying to discuss any issue at all (see quotes below). I asked them numerous times to refute something, if they have something to refute. Instead they resort to spam the thread. You can check either last few pages here, or their recent post history, it doesn't take much to figure out that they have contributed only spam and ad-hominem. Thus it's possible that they are paid trolls, I don't see what would be any other motive to do what they are doing (perhaps simply cult members who went insane? Who knows.). i found socrates basically a waste of time for the average guy its his baby let him use it don't waste your cash on it. it costs £11 $15usd for private blog per month and that is well worth it.
If you are unaware of Socrates - it is an AI driven service following the financial markets. Worth every penny.
No, its not illegal. Nothing is sold on those premises. It's stated clearly in the terms of service what you pay for and not.
Thus I have ignored them, and deleted my replies to them. I will not reply to them any further. Judge it for yourselves of course, subscribe at your peril. Again, if there is something specific they have to refute, they will always be welcome to do so. Be coherent tho. Of course, they will never be able to do it, because we already know they are being dishonest spammers. They had been warned earlier: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1082909.msg53836776#msg53836776Just to mention few things they might refute if they care about having civil discussion, here is a recap of my recent writings: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1082909.msg53513881#msg53513881Here is organized blog by @AnonymousCoder: https://armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com/@m96, @WHATEVERBABY2, @over45 et al...
IF YOU ARE NOT INTERESTED IN GETTING ANY CREDIBILITY, OR GETTING THE "TRUTH" OUT
THEN WHAT THE HECK ARE YOU DOING HERE IN THE FIRST PLACE?
Again, if there is anything at all you want to refute, do so or kindly stop being a waste of bandwidth and time.UPDATE 02/26: WHATEVERBABY2 got nuked, but apparently he reincarnated WHATEVERBABY3. |
|
|
|
You have my permission as Caesar by Latin rite to make DeVCoin go to the moon.
Ave Dan! Ex luna scientia. |
|
|
|
Buy:
ixc ($.02) - going to minimum $1,000
Buy Bitcore BTX ($.14) - it’s the closest thing to real bitcoin “electronic cash” ($10,000)
DVC & I0C, both neat zero now, should give at least a 1,000x return next year
Nice call! |
|
|
|
In other lulz: Posted Feb 17, 2020 by Martin Armstrong QUESTION: Mr. Armstrong; I can see your warning about Big Bang and the bonds markets would crash after 2015.75 going into the bottom of your business cycle on January 18, 2020. However, it seems that the negative interest rates have created your bond crash not in price but in participation.ANSWER: [...] Some would think that the forecast was wrong simply because the prices have not crashed. We have had the Bank of Japan saying they will buy government bonds on an unlimited basis. This is NOT a free market. It has “crashed” from the perspective of participation. |
|
|
|
Ok, lol. Funny topic timing right after WHATEVERBABY2 shill joined here. One of the more fascinating things is when people try to challenge me as an analyst and pretend it is a personal confrontation to try to prove me wrong personally. I have stated many times, whenever I have had a personal opinion that has been counter to Socrates, it is me who has always been wrong. As humans, we simply do not always see everything. We miss things taking place around the world or maybe too focused on one personal perspective.
Again, deception. Martin barely ever makes clear distinction in his blogs whether it's him making a prediction, or Socrates. So it's mostly up to readers to figure it out. Of course, in hindsight, he might let us know who it was making a prediction, lol. Ok well, you might argue I accuse him of being wrong personally, but simply because I don't believe that he has a computer as he portraits it in the first place. Socrates writes over 1,000 reports e4ach day covering global stocks, bonds, commodities, real estate, and interest rates. These are ALL entirely written by the computer – NOT me. There is no human interaction. This is entirely Socrates. I find it so funny when people try to say of Armstrong will be wrong or whatever for they fail to understand this is the next evolution in the analysis. The greatest error in all analysis is human bias and the failure to see things from an objectives viewpoint.
Yes yes, Socrates is amazing. Keep parroting it so that cult members don't forget it. Confidence in Martin Armstrong into the abyssMarty, you've reached your peak, right on schedule of course @WHATEVERBABY2's pathetic posts were by far the worst shilling attempt to date, which indicates a clear shift in the trend.
@m96, @WHATEVERBABY2, @over45 et al...
IF YOU ARE NOT INTERESTED IN GETTING ANY CREDIBILITY, OR GETTING THE "TRUTH" OUT
THEN WHAT THE HECK ARE YOU DOING HERE IN THE FIRST PLACE?
We heard all of your nonsense throughout the 360 pages here. You are not original, it's getting tiresome. Present facts and evidence, argue certain points (be specific) or kindly stop spamming the thread. Currently you are nothing but a waste of everyone's bandwidth and time. |
|
|
|
lol traxo the fact that you jump on anyone who defends him even a little bit as being either him or a paid shill just shows your desperation.
You made 4/4 low effort posts thus far. There is 0 credibility in them. You refuted absolutely nothing, and backed up none of your claims with anything. That's the whole point. I do not "jump on anyone who defends him", I'd just like you loonies to actually provide something coherent instead of brainless parroting. where as i have been honest i will repeat to all don't bother with his socrates computer to us its worthless its crap crap crap and expensive hmmm.... not doing my paid work very well am i lol he might sack me oh no...
Sure, you might be honest. Point is, you have no credibility at all. Thus your posts are actually spam, just like the posts of other loonies who jump in here and spam the thread about how Marty is some great savior, without sourcing any of your claims. Obviously I'd like to see if Armstein is right about anything, but as I said, you MA shills back up nothing, so it's kinda tiresome. If you are not interested in getting any credibility, then why the heck did you chime in here in the first place, except to spam, or collect reward from Martin Armstrong? i wish now id called my account martin armstrong damn that would have been funny
Somebody here already used "m96" as a username, it probably stands for Marty #96... Lol... That number seems about right. You are #97 |
|
|
|
ArchivedSome people will ALWAYS desperately try to paint the ECM as wrong or attack me personally when they cannot argue with the forecasts.
This is simply the dark side of human nature which will always fight against the light. They are of the same character who killed people for arguing the world was round and not flat. They burned Bruno alive and rejoiced in his pain.Why these types of people will always try to prevent any advancement in understanding anything is truly astonishing. It is hard to comprehend why they refuse to ever listen. What do they have to gain other than refusing to believe something? There always must be a dark v light confrontation for that is the very essence of what makes the cycle function. So when they cannot challenge the message, they turn to hatred of the messenger. Ok, this is tiresome Marty... You are the one producing 1-way communication. People in this thread are the ones willing to discuss anything here. You've simply been proven wrong. Note Marty deleted the quoted part out of his blog post, but as soon as I put the link to archived version that contains it, he put it back in the blog. Unfortunately I forgot to archive it when the text got deleted, but perhaps some of you noticed. |
|
|
|
oooops. markets are hitting new all time highs, but marty said we are in for 20% correction now.... the ecm date was a great call, but it may have only been a one week correction.... ooops
Visualization: https://i.imgur.com/YZ9YKsp.pngLol. Btw, try to provide sources and quotes along with claims. Today's blog from MA states that a "rare superposition even occurred on Fri 31st Jan marking the low".......
BUT on the 2nd Feb on his private blog: "we did close the week below the 28,375 level, which implies we do have a correction in progress"
Honestly, you couldn't make this stuff up.....
Posted Feb 2, 2020 by Martin Armstrong
The Dow & the Economic Confidence Model
COMMENT: Marty, I have to laugh. Only those who have followed you more 20 years understand you have discovered the hidden order behind the facade. Fantastic call on this turn in the ECM. Once again to the very day in the Dow. And people do not think your model is real? They must be idiots who also worship Greta.
Sure, no matter what evidence I put forward, there will be people who refuse to believe anything. We need those type of people for that are what make the cycle work.
Those of us who are actually intelligent and are capable of learning from our mistakes, mature and then we become the people who sell the high to the novice and buy when they panic and sell everything at the low.
The morons, incapable of ever learning the lessons of life, cry to government that they WOULD HAVE BEEN correct except for some devil who manipulated the market against them. What they are really doing is refusing to admit that they were wrong. That inability to learn the lessons of life keep them perpetually on the wrong side of the cycle. We need those fools. I choose not to be a fool and assume I can teach anyone.
A professor from Princeton University once told me I reminded him of Einstein.
Addition: Posted Feb 2, 2020 by Martin Armstrong
What they have expressed is watching geopolitical events but this time the Dow peaked on the very day.
Wonder what evidence he presented? Maybe in private blogs? Over the past few months there's been plenty of evidence exposing his fraud in this thread.
I'm sorry, but how fucking difficult is it for a "institutional advisor" to let a publisher print enough books? It's just paper and ink.
Still no legit reviews. Don't you think that is kinda odd for a best-seller? https://www.amazon.com/Manipulating-World-Economy-Martin-Armstrong/product-reviews/0578611171/?sortBy=recent |
|
|
|
Happy birthday, Vitalik MarkM! =)  |
|
|
|
And the ECM 2020 turning point should be a low.
Not sure if he said that, but what does it even mean? That also can't even be wrong because one man's low is another man's high. |
|
|
|
IMO he is only a follower of the leading technical analysis theories.
Hey, thanks for your input. I had similar thoughts recently: Remember that he claims his computer processes inputs on a multi-dimensional plane that is beyond human capability, and at the same time he posts 2D charts for you to read them to back up his predictions. But I've not went so far to compare his charts and predictions with leading analysts. |
|
|
|
An excerpt from MA his 2014 Cycles of War Report (2014!!!) https://i.imgur.com/Zp6otO2.pngECM 2020.05... Ooh but wait... you bunch of circle jerkers here can argue now that the news reports came out in 2020 and that he was wrong. Today's latest blog is saying that the next chance of a pandemic will be 2022.....the goal posts keep on moving! He can never be wrong that way....if nothing happens in 2022, it will be 2024. Its just a guessing game at the end of the day.
So, even Martin himself forgot about the document that that Looneyexpress quoted? As I said Oh, "circle jerkers" could also argue that MA scattershot multiple dates for same prediction in other blogs/reports. Who knows.
What MA is doing is to scatter forecasts like a shotgun. Then in hindsight he creates a sales campaign around the one out of many that succeeded while ignoring the failed ones.
That's it. Yet some cult members will dig out what even Marty can't. |
|
|
|
An excerpt from MA his 2014 Cycles of War Report (2014!!!) https://i.imgur.com/Zp6otO2.pngECM 2020.05... Ooh but wait... you bunch of circle jerkers here can argue now that the news reports came out in 2020 and that he was wrong. Hey ummm, SMIII? Thanks for your input. Here is how "circle jerking" works: 1) Provide clear quote of MA predicting a certain event and the timing of the said event if MA provided it (I guess you provided quote of him predicting... some thing that would happen around 2019). 2) Point out which event happened and you think MA predicted. So with regards to 2), can you point out what exactly do you think he predicted? Which current (we are around that time-frame I guess) event? Then we will refer back to the MA quote from 1) and see if MA nailed it. I don't see anything irrational here, users here have done the same thing when refuting MAs predictions. I guess the "circle jerkers" can argue that MA hasn't really predicted anything... YET, tho the date and current events might be compelling. Oh, "circle jerkers" could also argue that MA scattershot multiple dates for same prediction in other blogs/reports. Who knows. But ok I guess let's not go into that for now. |
|
|
|
COMMENT #1: HILARIOUS!! A simple FOOL wanting to shoot the messenger.
“A closed mind gathers NO facts.”
Marty, we gathered facts exposing your deception. It's all documented, and quoted. REPLY: No worries. I find these people just a joke myself. I refrain from publishing them because sometimes they are just so off the wall it is hilarious. They claim I make up the questions because I publish ones that are at least valid. So once in a while I will post some of these crazy ones just to show how nuts they can be.
It's actually because questions have been generic. How about you actually quote our posts and link to them? Tell us what we got wrong. Be specific. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
