According to Guidelines for threads, the "Goods" board is for trading physical goods and that could be why your topic was deleted. I am not sure, but " Digital goods" sub-board may be appropriate for your topic. Why didn't I think of that one, I'd give it a try. Thanks! |
|
|
|
Probably the off-topic section since we don't have a non-crypto related moneymaking subforum. Probably not the best section for visibility, but yea.
You're right, lots of spammy topics there... But I did some searching and seems that there were giveaways on eBooks and software like this |
|
|
|
|
Like the title, anyone knows where do I post mine (it's about earning some beermoney)?
I posted it in the Goods section but it got zapped
|
|
|
|
I am sorry to say that guys, but it is already known who will win the next Lambo:  (or they have again problems with calculations and rounding) Congrats! Don't forget to show us a photo of it inside the garage. But yeah, it's pretty common. I did post it some time ago as well  |
|
|
|
For players familiar with CSGO or trading in general, we're looking for some feedback on improving the current P2P system. Currently it's pretty much barebones and we'd want to enhance the trading experience.  The lucky one that drops one of the features which we'd implement in the rework shall receive a small token of appreciation |
|
|
|
I also bought near that point but I am not that optimistic about these guys completing the roadmap,they had enough time,they took over since February 2021-Aprli 2021 and now we are about 1.5 years later and the price of the FUN has only fallen in value.The CEO of this project Adriaan Brink if I typed the name correctly has a failed coin history before it so I don't buy them anymore,I have sold all of them,made some profit because I kept buying the majority of them when the price was low but now I don't touch them unless I see true development.The casinos they have build have not the same audience and user base as those well reputable crypto ones we have in the forum.
If you see other tokens like BFG, they aren't performing that well either even if they are priced higher than FUN. But at least over here, we get free spins and sats instead of alts/ shitcoins that we hardly care about. |
|
|
|
User WADU HEK took the plunge with the $1,000 for a Sugar Rush bonus buy, and got back 5 times the stake. High risk, high reward indeed!
Congratulations! |
|
|
|
At this point I won't blame the campaign manager why they accept members with negative tags on their campaigns, it's the manager's discretion. The important thing to note is the quality of posts from participants even if they did not get merit in the last 120 days. I just think that anyone can report anyone's post regardless of what campaign they are promoting. So if you find shitpost from any different campaigns, please report their posts to moderator.
At the end of the day, the casino gets the gamblers it needs, both managers and participants get paid. Cycle repeats. Hate it or not, it's a win-win situation. Not like all casino representatives actually bother to go through the post contents because ROI is utmost important to them. |
|
|
|
Here you go: Street Selfie? Why all these crazy requirements in the name of KYC verification?The thread is about CloudBet casino that asked one of their users for KYC verification with a street selfie. Really, that was the first time I've heard of KYC with a selfie in front of a building name or street name sign. As if taking selfies and holding ID cards and today's newspaper isn't enough. This is certainly becoming more of a hassle and it seems to me that some casinos are using excessive KYC verification as a method to default on payouts. I hope it doesn't become a trend. Thanks for the source, definitely a bruh moment. The level of distrust when they have to go all out. Imagine showing them your bank account before withdrawing just to prove you're not linked to some criminal activity. |
|
|
|
Email change requests do indeed need to come in the form of a bitcoin signed message from an address previously linked to the account. I obviously can't accept requests for "my friend's" account. As in this case, what that actually means 99.99% of the time is that the request is for "one of my accounts that has been banned for multi-accounting".
Gotcha, thanks for confirming! |
|
|
|
They can ask this if they have doubts about the documents you submitted, there are more strange KYC verification like the one I read where you need to walk on the street where you live and with you holding the latest newspaper.
I don't know why they think that you are a different person from the documents you submitted, they should ask for more proof because you are willing to provide all the necessary documents you need to verify that you are the one playing and what you submitted are all true, think of the cost of filing a suit then what you've lost, and ask yourself is it really worth it, if you made up your mind like all the previous recommendation you need to consult to a lawyer for a proper proceeding.
Strange, got a source for that one? All the while I thought simply holding up the piece of paper with the latest date was the gold standard. |
|
|
|
True @Pmalek. Perhaps you could update the value to "Dynamic" or "Depends on network"? For some casinos I have written that the fees depend on network congestion, and for others I have simply said at the time of writing or checking as in the case of 500Casino. I thought about standardizing it and using the term dynamic fees instead, but I though it might cause confusion among newbies and those who don't know what dynamic fees are. In that case, there would be questions about what the term means etc. Worry not, it could be explained in a fine print located at the bottom of the table. Less hassle than rather having to update whenever someone posts a change like the above  E.g. Dynamic* *Subject to change either through network fees or set by the operator
|
|
|
|
|
True @Pmalek. Perhaps you could update the value to "Dynamic" or "Depends on network"?
|
|
|
|
|
That's strange, shouldn't the standard verification be via documents submission through the platform instead of Skype?
|
|
|
|
What's better than a winner from our casino? A Content Creator winner from our casino. Congrats on that juicy 18K!
GIVEAWAY: Who is the most entertaining streamer in the industry? Don't forget to drop your 500 ID in the Tweet below for a chance to win $10 🤑
https://twitter.com/CSGO500/status/1564343867641659393
Speaking of juicy, we have some anonymous fella with the insane 600 dollar crash bets, riding them high multipliers! 
 |
|
|
|
Funtoken's buy-sell difference is 2sat now just like when the price was twice & thrice as it is now, I think it's unfair in these low prices.
Signal to buy moar during the dip |
|
|
|
|
In the end, a casino is simply a casino. What makes it stand out is mainly the games it offers and the bonuses provided. But still, they share many of the game providers, rakeback structure, etc.
After all, players want the best bang for their buck, not just winning what they wagered. So saying X is the best, and such is pretty much subjective because they excel in different areas. Casino A could be holding frequent giveaways, casino B could be generous with affiliate commissions, just saying.
Those that want to pioneer in something new need to risk their funds. If all is fine and dandy, good but what happens when the market goes south like now? Many NFTs have lost their ATH value. Rollbit's fortunate they have the financial strength to commit, but for the rest, they might not.
Some do try to reinvent the wheel but without sustainable income, they ultimately collapse. If players are ripping the site from left to right, it's all useless.
|
|
|
|
You could add this to the list as well In addition to the Monte Carlo casino, the gambler's fallacy originated from there as well. Gamblers lost millions of Francs trying to bet against black that the ball landed on 26 times in a row. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
