AizenSou, would you have good settings for the 750ti on MRC at nfactor 13? I've been asking here, but no luck yet.
The best I've managed so far is ~9Kh/s per card... (I'm not on MRC, but CACH, identical mining specs at the moment)

Thanks
~ Myagui

That would be me! Just submitted a ticket with my peers list. Hope that's what you're looking for.
Cheers
~ Myagui

I think this would be super! I'd add that secure chat (a' la' BitMessage) integrated into the wallet would be another big plus, and it would aid in the process of private/business communications across the p2p marketplace.

I understand these take probably a lot of complex development work to achieve, but I'm here for the long run anyways    I feel that with so many altcoins today, real-world-purpose is lacking. I think that given enough time & commitment, we could make CACHE useful in many new ways, and in the process, we'd be attracting more users to this community.

Cheers,
~ Myagui

EDIT: Oh, almost forgot: Just had my 1st ever CACH stake mint!  For statistical reference, it was a ~10 CACH input, and coin age was about 2 months. This suggests that with the current PoS difficulty, it does take a while for recent coins to have a shot at staking. Certainly a lot more than the "minimum age" is to be expected.

Bump! Could anyone help on this? I've managed to up the performance to about ~9Kh/s per card, but still ways off, assuming I should be reaching half of what I had before the nfactor increase. I've gone through the google doc with the various configs, but nothing there to help.

Cheers,
~ Myagui

Looking damn fine!
~ Myagui

This is what I had spotted! Was on the XC thread, but I have no clue if the feature originated with that coin or some other one.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=630547.msg7045917#msg7045917

It's possible that I learned about the checkbox to enable staking from YACoin, I really have no memory from where I got it.
(Damn old age!  )
Cheers,
~ Myagui

I'm not sure it was YACoin Beave162, I did say "recent coin"  In all seriousness, I'll be damned if I can't remember. Will dig around my browsing history when my toddler gives me a break! Does YACoin show the PoS staking "weight"?
I remember only that I had seen a screenshot with a tooltip displaying something very roughly along these lines:
"Your PoS weight is X, the network PoS weight is Y, on average you should mint a PoS block in Z days".


The 750 TI is awesome at many algo's, though I'm not sure scrypt:jane is where it performs best (relative to an AMD part). With the previous nfactor, I was doing slightly more than 25Kh/s per card. With the current nfactor, I still have to find out what the best settings are, in any case, right now I'm doing ~9Kh/s per card (reasonably overclocked).

Happy Mining
~ Myagui

Great community we have here. Kudos to you Mr. Kalgecin!

Off I go to find out proper settings for the new nfactor with my 750ti's. If I can't break some better mining rates with these, will have to go back to what I had been doing recently: mine a "random but profitable crapcoin", quickly dump the proceeds, and get me some more CACH! 

Looking forward for the privacy enhancements!

Oh, and while I'm at it, what would the group think about making the PoS feature a bit more user friendly? I've seen some recent coin that had a couple of interesting PoS features, one was a single checkbox to "mint-unlock" the wallet, the other thing was that it showed "weight" or I suppose, the calculated probability of finding a PoS block with the current balance/coinage.
Can't remember what coin that was, and quite possible that it was not even an "original" feature, I should say I can't (or care to) by any means keep up with all the pointless new coins that launch everyday now. Will post here if I can find out where I spotted that feature...

Cheers all,
~ Myagui

Would anyone have optimized settings for scrypt:jane at nfactor 13 for the 750ti? I had a very decent 25Kh/s at nfactor 12, but CACH just bumped to 13 now, and I'm only managing ~8Kh/s per card with the best settings I've found so far. Autotune crashes for me every time and I don't think I'm doing enough 

Thanks guys!
~ Myagui

Seems you found a block at the updated diff gentamicin.    (here's to the block maturing!!!!)

Kalgecin,

I don't know if it's just a matter of giving it some time, but in any case, looks like the block stats are not updating yet on
http://explorer.cachecoin.org

Think we're generally over the nfactor 'bump' now (or as soon as everyone is running the updated code). 
Maybe we need to reach out to exchanges & what not? (don't ask me, I'm clueless  )

Good job guys!
~ Myagui

 

http://www.magma.com/hpc

Sexy (and surely damn expensive!)
~ Myagui

All good Aizen, makes perfect sense that we all have different opinions on these things.

I generally don't agree with the notion that getting GPU miners onboard a coin implies a value drop. The value drop happens when GPU mining performance largely exceeds what was possible with CPUs, thus the GPU miners are "willing" to dump their coins at much lower values as they still obtain or perceive a large "relative profit". This drop is usually short lived if the coin has strong merits.

Over time, mining cost balances out with exchange rate, assuming that the daily coin generation remains the same. Fluctuations are anyhow to be expected, much like we see that whenever there is a big price spike for a certain coin, it's nethash goes up dramatically, even if just for a short period of time, as miners jump on it for instant profit... Heck, that's the business of the multi-pools, isn't it...

If Nvidia could mine cryptonight, but not AMD, my "profits" would not really change, simply because I would be holding long term. I would expect to be mining more coins per day, as my mining power relative to the overall nethash would increase, since Nvidia is still a small portion of the miners out there.

Btw: RieCoin GPU? I did a quick search and didn't find anything. I had even asked about a GPU miner on the ANN thread long ago. I had mined some, for the scientific curiosity I suppose, but the development pace was not to my liking, so I have turned away from it since.

EDIT: I thought DGA (that's Prof. Andersen, right?) had only been releasing CPU miners... Still not found anything...

Cheers,
~ Myagui

That's not very fair AizenSou. There was no screaming here, in fact, I was just responding to the poster that was asking others to join at the attempt of guessing what "new algo" C&C were working on.

In any case, since you asked, my motivation for a GPU miner is quite simple: I have 2x really old Xeons, and 4x 750TIs, and that's really all that I mine with (I'm not much into the cloud/renting approach to be honest, don't get as much fun out of it). For the technical aspects, and to diversify a little, I am aiming to mine some Monero. If all I can through at it are the 2x old Xeons, then so be it. These are making me little over 1 coin a day. If I could have the 750TIs also on it, with reasonable performance, I'd be happy to mine some more. That's it...

Side note: I think C&C get's his "fix" from the challenge really, so the harder it is, all the better, and more fun is had along the way. New "cpu only" algo = C&C's porn 

Cheers,
~ Myagui

Thinking C&C have "sensed" the big bucks to be made on Monero. Even if GPUs would have only a slight performance increase over a high spec CPU, there's some massive potential there. I think other coins are following suit to increase their privacy features (myself a confessed CACHE fan  ), but Monero is a very special case in this regard (if it keeps making the right steps as it moves forward).

If anyone else wants to make this one a 'bounty', I'll be happy to pledge 1 week's worth of a 750TI mining Monero, as long as the mining performance is above that of a reasonable spec CPU (say the i7 4770K for example). Preferably many times faster 

Happy mining,
~ Myagui

Nope. Myself here have 3 750TI's on PCIe v1 slots (x16, x8, x4), and have no trouble reaching the advertised speeds as the rest of the 'greenies' here. The one on the x8 slot is actually using a riser, so I guess that one might actually be operating at x1 (it's a 1x to 16x riser). Looks like a CPU bottleneck to me in his case. 

Edit: My CPU is Core 2 Duo E6750 if it helps. Nothing else running obviously, but importantly, windows defender real-time protection is disabled!

Cheers,
~ Myagui

gristlelump, I've used this one without issues for a very long time (though I'm not CPU mining right now tbh).

https://github.com/thirtybird/cpuminer/releases/

You'll find the 2.4.0 release has binaries optimized for the various CPU versions, and both x64 & x86.
I couldn't tell if that's what you were using already or not, anyways, hope it helps.

My startup parameters are the following, pasted from my cpu mining shortcut:
minerd-x64-core2.exe -a scrypt-jane -o stratum+tcp://cach.catcoin.cz:3333 -u username.worker -p password -t 6 --nfmin 4 --nfmax 30 --starttime 1388949883
(core2 as I got an old Xeon on this box)

Happy Mining,
~ Myagui

Oh, hell no. I wish I knew how, but seriously, that's all way out of my league. 

I know a poll is not open on the subject, but can I request that we update the wallet to use the latest CACHE logo? Also that splash screen is getting on my nerves. I've always been picky against brown leather wallets for some inexplicable reason!   

/disclaimer
Too much free time on my hands today. Done with nitpicking for the day!
/disclaimer

Cheers,
~ Myagui

I've been mining all this while and have not seen any share acceptance or payout variation other than what's expected along with difficulty fluctuations.
I have not been on P2Pool though, always on http://cach.catcoin.cz.

Kalgecin, I've moved some funds around using selective inputs, and had no issues at all.
Anything else that I can do to help validate the coin control feature?

Happy Mining,
~ Myagui

Can you get us a Windows binary Kalgecin? I'll be happy to try it out and move some (tiny) funds around using coin control.
Cheers,
~ Myagui