The only company officer of Swifthub Ltd. was a Lithuanian, Viktorija Zirnelyte, who makes a living exploiting lax Scottish limited partnership legislation by registering hundreds of shell companies at apartment addresses in Scotland. A number of her clients are Lithuanian, Latvian or Ukrainian, whose legitimate needs for a Scottish company are unclear.
The UK government is currently reviewing this registration process as part of its attempts to stop the laundering of "dirty Russian money" to offshore accounts.

Zirnelyte attained brief press notoriety after some of her creations were found to have been integral to the 2014 $billion Moldovan bank fraud.

What on Earth would possess anyone to send any money to a one page website like this?

Careful Vod, you're skating on thin ice there.



Oh shit, hoist by my own petard 


Double shit.

As I pointed out to the other shouty shill, an Associate Membership of EBA is in no way a "seal of approval."

The only criteria to become an Associate Member of the EBA are

1) The ability to apply:


2)  The ability to fill in a one page application form


3) The ability to pay:

---

This whole approach of "If they haven't been shut down then they must be legit" is rather specious.
Try harder.

Boring, content free spam by the look of your vacuous post history, ever since you bought the account from a Fiipino account farmer and made your first post on New Years Eve for the sig munneee.
If that's not a reason, it should be.

Lol, quality vouches if I ever seen.
First one registered, posted and logged off in seven minutes. Eight minutes later, repeat with the second one.

Not exactly, Genesis customers have a problem, Genesis is doing fine.

I see that recently they have come up with another genius (for Genesis) scheme whereby customers can avoid their contracts being cancelled (and their investment vanishing) by paying upfront maintenance fees 


Hmmm.
So, they charge $0.14 per Th/s maintenance fee.
@ 0.1J/gigahash (S9) and $0.06 electricity (Iceland), that leaves around $0.08 per day "costs" per Th/s outside of actually powering the miner, or around $1.20 a day for an S9.
So what they are saying is that one of their big mining barns, with e.g. 10,000 S9's in it, costs them $12,000 to run per day after allowing for electricity...
That's nearly 4.5 million dollars in "fixed costs" per year to operate.
And they "don't make any profit" out of that.
I wonder how those millions of dollars are allocated?
One thing's for sure, they'll never say...

FHCM Ltd (Flashy Hash Cloud Mining):

A £1 capital company incorporated 3 days ago, registered to a rental address in a squalid UK city back street, in the name of an Australian fitness instructor.

Obviously completely legit.

It's a joke isn't it?

HaveBitcoin.com and bitcoinfive.com both redirect to Baybit and both have longstanding dubious reputations and outstanding scam accusations, the linked one of which includes an unverified doxx of a possible principal.
It has been suggested, but not confirmed, they may also be linked to the Bitbot Ponzi.
 
In my long experience, any scheme which makes a big deal about being UK company registered is always a scam.

Yeah so did I, still "unhandled", vive la caveat emptor lol.
Live in hope that noobs may actually use the Search button.

Whilst investigations for suspicious behavior are the topic, I suggest the Quickseller account be closely scrutinized for showing a previously unheard of sense of humor.

1. I doubt there will be many "experiences" dealing with a two month old website, registered for 10 more months..
It seems to be the simplest form of Ponzi setup possible: give them your money, they give you a little bit back. Till they don't.
2. That depends if you want the post deleted and negative trust for promoting a Ponzi.


 

You appear to be quite capable of making a fool of yourself with any assistance from me.

The linked thread has been mutilated by VEIAG to conceal their difficulty in answering simple questions about their scheme.
They claim, just like you do for Worldcore and EBA, "transparency" and credibility by association with a third party (UN Global Compact), which vets them for neither of those qualities.

Proves nothing and means nothing.
Pay some money and fill in a one page application form = instant "credibility".
A common tactic, see VEIAG and the UN for a recent example.

Apart from the obviously fake team, these scammers list an address


The "Blue Islands Monetary Authority" is pure fiction.
CIMA stands for Cayman Islands Monetary Authority, search  "CIMA Licence No. 88371190" and you get a list of scams including
BTC Excel Invest INC
BITCOIN-POOL Invest INC
COIN-POOL Invest INC
ad nauseum

61 Richmond Avenue is the London home of an educational charity, the Dima Foundation.

When I open a trade, I have in mind (for technical or fundamental reasons) two things, success or failure, represented by a target and a stop loss.
The target is hit when the market behaves the way I predict, the stop is hit when the anticipated scenario doesn't happen, when the original analysis is faulty and and becomes obselete (e.g. in TA, a volume break of a resistance area, the holding of which was central to my strategy).
Risk/reward is a vital consideration when positioning both closing trades.
E.g. if A is a (long) entry level, B the target and C the stop, then I'll usually only consider it a good risk/reward trade if B-A>3(A-C). I find this criterion also helps prevent over trading.
I'm wary of leaving stops on platforms because of hunting and flashes. This means operating them manually, which requires a certain amount of self discipline (and time).

True, but you could have explained the Trust system a bit.

It seems to be a source of (understandable) confusion amongst new members that there are, in fact, two regulatory bodies on BCT.

One lot has rules it doesn't apply and the other lot applies rules it doesn't have; can be a bit of a head fuck for them.

It's a WASP thing.