first of all.
i know badecker has some really short term memory. but ill make a quick reminder

hospitals are not just given a fixed lump sum under the diagnoses 'covid'

what actually happens is when blood samples are taken theres a cost for that
when xrays/MRI's are done theres a cost for that
when ventilation is done there is a cost for that
even procedures like having 2 nurses aid a patient to flip onto their stomach has been calculated to a cost of that time too.
ventilator equipment. the oxygen
medication/pain relief. + nurses time to administer it.  all have costs attached

each patients treatment is slightly different and comes at different costs.
what faux media portray is a total bills of these total costs then divided by the number of patients to then get an average.

did you know that disability groups are in uproar that a disabled persons hospital care is more expensive than an able body persons hospital bill. without understanding that simple things like the extra care of bed baths and toilet care adds on costs to the disabled person. where as the abled person can selfcare their hygiene

this average number. is not the exact funds a hospital gets just for writing covid.
again. its just an averaged number based on .. (take a deep breath and really concentrate)

the actual treatments a hospital does of multiple individual patients. case by case.
totaled up.
and then separetly and after the fact. an accounting/faux media. then divide that by the number of patients to get an average for 'news summary' purposes
this bill is not always funded by government but also by insurance providers. or in some cases the patient themselves.

..
and again for emphasis
hospitals dont get $xxxx funds for just writing the word covid, only $xx.
infact just writing covid will earn them maybe $50(not exact.. but just the doctors time).
for having a covid test to verify it will get them a combined $100(not exact but cost of the sampling)
if they have MRI +$500 chest xray +$50 .. CT scan +$400
ventilator costs can be $1k a day

meaning someone with covid. had the test had the scans but didnt need to be sedated and ventilated would be cheaper than someone that needed to be ventilated

(i know your might pull out the story of the ER inexperienced doctor who sedated a few patients and ventilated them blaming it on being told 'its ARDS standard protocol' but that doctor by his own words got reprimanded for that incompetence)


the hospitals have to show reason for their cost claims.
and they also have to show reason for why they needed each treatment/diagnostic tool too
otherwise they il get reprimanded
heck. if doctors did just write covid. and didnt bother with any actual scans/tests/real diagnoses
the average would be more like $50 not
if incompentant doctors just gave random scans/treatments for the pure hell of adding up costs.. they would get reprimanded

doctors have to justify their actions and be accountable. and even badecker 4 months ago when he tried to highlight a doctor.. not realising that that doctor got reprimanded for his actions and thus debunking himself


im guessing that badecker is a herbalist that has never even seen his own medical records or been in a hospital to see the kind of details that go into each diagnoses

i told badecker this fact months ago in another topic. it shut him up for a bit.. but seems he has a memory of a goldfish and circles back to fiction land of his antivaxxer scripts quite often. so i just gently nudge him back to reality again.
i was going to quote it again. but thought it wasnt worth going full on spoodfeeding mission. as he obviously didnt remember it from last time. but im glad you linked it.(saved me time)
it should give some peace and quiet about that aspect for.. a month.. hopefully more

the home hobby miners have an average mining cost of about $9k-$12k mining right now.
however. the mining farms who can get hold of stock at wholesale/manufacturing cost. and also get preferential contracted energy costs have a ~$5k cost of mining a bitcoin

..
one thing to note is that although mining hashrate appears to have gone up from 90exa to 120exa
this is not a sign that hobby miners have increased alongside mining farms
but instead hobby miners have decreased. and mining farms have updated their rigs from ~70thash to 110thash(60% more efficient)

meaning without needing to expand warehouses. they just swapped equipment in the same warehouse to up their hashrate. and instead of that accelerating the hashrate upto ~140exa. the 10~20exa drop of hobby miners means its showing as a 120exa network hashrate overall

in short less hobby miners that cant afford it. dropped out
more hashpower from mining farms that upgraded hardware

most hobby miners that were mining to hoard coin find it cheaper to now just buy it at $9k, rather than to mine it at $12k

all that juan wants to keep circling back to is:
"settlement" "coins" "payout"
seems he is stuck in that mindset again.
oh well.

IRA and CSW are both saying the partnership is real
but .. heres the thing, they want THE JUDGE to say he agree's that its real
then they can patent troll

i know juan wants to imagine some 410k coin demand thing happening.
but this whole game is about getting THE JUDGE to agree that the partnership is real under only the voice of ira and CSW both saying its real. without any further/actual proof.
ira has directly asked the judge for this.

but i see from now till october+ juan will just want to talk about coins coins coins
so ill leave him in that ignorant 'its about coin' bubble.
where there is no documents that suggest that its only about the coins

you inferred that whats injected stays in its exact same state and passes the bloodbrain barrier as is.
i corrected your assumption that your body does things to it before even getting near the brain. and the only way for your inference/scare tactic to be real is if someone was to directly inject the vaccine into the brain. which never happens

if you really want something to concern yourself that has some factual relevance. and not your cultish anti-vaxxer nonsense
is that if its injected in the fatty tissue vs the muscle.
the body metabolises it in the muscle and takes care of your first fears..
but if dont in the fatty tissue. it lingers there and can cause some irritation and to simplify it down.. gets all sticky and forms a fatty shell thus less metabolised as it goes around your system once it gets into your blood stream. but here is the good part. the fatty one.
once cycling your bodie blood stream wont get into your brain very well. thus less likely to be immunised up there.

so in short. your main worry is the skin irritation at the injection spot because the doctor didnt stick it in deep enough

your own topic creations 'mothers report' was about the chickenpox / MMR vaccines

over the last 30+years there are only 9 chicken pox strains
so your yet again unresearched assumptions that these strains mutate rapidly in the space of person to person makes you look more of a fool when you try to advertise it as a reason to say vaccines don work

if these 9.. 3 are more based in the middle-east/asia area and 3 are more based in europ/america
and another 3 are dotted inbetween

however there are 2 main chickenpox vaccines can each take care of 4-5 strains

i know you want to beleive that a vaccine is made just to cover a single strain. and i know you want to hope that strains alter every month..
but the truth is that its more like a 5-15 YEAR event to cause a mutation of any significant difference that would then require new vaccine research

but hey.
the world knows there are only ~9 chicken pox strains and only need 2 types of vaccine dependant on what area your in.
but i know you will still try to push the myth that there are millions of strains and a vaccine is only able to counter 1 strain.
but thats your own ignorance making you not really know whats true

i would tell that vaccines are not injected directly in the brain. and your body has many complex things tht go on before anything even reaches the bloodbrain barrier

is this lame freeman script your excuse to entice kids into your car,
'no comment mr police officer, these kids have a right to travel and so you cant question me about why i picked them up and carried them into the back of my white van'

as for distance
if someone is exhaling nasty bugs/particulates. or even bad breath. the further away you are the less it will affect you

next time you have someone with bad breath. stand right beside them and take a sniff,.. then stand 2 metres away and take another sniff.
the second one you will notice the fresher air

just to add
the red device the guy used was sensing the kids carbon dioxide exhales...

a proper test would be a blood/ox monitor that goes onto someones finger and shows the drop of oxygen the person has

.. but it was funny watching the stupid video thats not even describing what the device is actually measuring alarming to

ofcourse its going to beep pressed against the mouth when exhaling.
the mask is not making a difference. the device would still do it unmasked
PRESSED AGAINST THE MOUTH

funny how he avoids pressing it against his own mouth and holds it an inch or 2 away
.. too obvious

next time use a blood/ox monitor that goes on the finger. then it will show actual effects in the body of any oxygen starvation difference. no speculation then

children are not nor ever have been demanded to wear masks

in the UK its never even been a question.
adults are fine. doctors wear masks while doing surgury for hours and dont drop dead.

but children especially under 2yo are more susceptible

i think bigtree and his blind flock are trying to take a known fact that children shouldnt wear masks. nor ever told that they should..

and then make it seem like some government order has mandated kids wear masks. to the pretend they have created some campaign that proves kids shouldnt. and then when the reality is that kids never were demanded to wear masks.. bigtree and flock pretend they are the reason..

but the reality is
there was no mandated order in the first place. so bigtree and cultish flock are arguing over a situation that never happened. pretending that they are the reason it never happened

very bad try.

whats next:?
pretend that unicorns are actually in existance and on a killing spree against all humans. and all unicorns need to be culled into extinction..
... wait a few months...
and when someone says there are no unicorns alive today. bigtree+cult followers can pretend that they waged war and sent unicorns into extinction, and no human lives lost due to bigtree+cults campaign
(sounds like the kind of games them people play)

even your buddy group doomad showed how the judge is not interest in where/who has the coins.
he isnt even judging on how much % CSW should pay out.
its not even about working out who orwhen or how one should buy out the other.
THATS YOUR SPECUALTION THAT THINKS ITS ABOUT THE COINS AND PAYOUTS


now your slowly grasping the real point of the court drama. its about both sides not opposing. but both trying to get a judge to document there is actually a partnership by both sides saying there was
.. its about getting the judge to document that he finds into fact that there was a partnership

need you be reminded of CSW long con since 2016 trying to get legal proof there was a partnership.. this is it this is his method to get legal documented 'proof'

and now your back to thinking that its about coins again(facepalm)
imagine other cases of other REAL companies.
they can go to court to just be judged of how much share a co-founder has. it does not auto-result in liquidation of the company.
it just creates rights and abilities where the parties have to share the company and run it together
.. if you think that all co-founder disputes result in instant liquidation of a company. the dang... Facebook should be dead by now.. oh wait. its still operating

i think. and take this as some positive criticism to help guide you out of the circle you are in. maybe you are stuck with the belief that the only ending is a payout/liquidation ordered by the court.
your stuck thinking about money...

however. this case has not asked for a liquidation. nor payout. just a legal judgement of partnership to be honoured. and that all bitcoin IP is included in that partnership

your rhetoric of the hopes that a beg for coins will then come.. the hope it CSW trips up and falls in a coffin and gets nailed inside. but that is just hopes. and not what this case is about nor been documented as.
you hope IRA demands CSW buys ira out. but thats not been asked. no buy out has been discussed

they are not liable to the 'partnership' these guys came after and are funding CSW lifestyle and schemes. they wont be dragged into the case of the 'partnership' as its not about that.

im just saying these 'money guys got conned by CSW to pay his bills and he promises them future riches via his 'story' exclusives and Slapp earnings. they are wiling to pay if they get a judgemetn that the partnership is real as it helps them then SLAPP random people. which CSW has been threatening to do for years


the whole game is to get a judge to say that no one is denying the partnership
then its.. win CSW and his patent troll games and hugs from his 'moneyguys'

this case is about geting a judge to agree that the partnership is full and not in disagreement thus making it legally an entity that has existed from the times the party have said.
thus winning CSW his long con

finally welcome to reality!!!
well done.
with all YOUR if's and buts and maybes and could be's you actually have said that ira has not even motioned for it

ok quick update on the other layers of CSW scummery:
at this present moment, from ATO point of view
CSW was just been handed a bill after they done an audit.
that is all..
(he then legged it out of australia)
now with the 'ownership' of the partnership in debate. the ATO still civilly have to work out who the bill payer actually is. which is civil. which is limited to a statue of limitations period

yes we outside of courtrooms/tax offices. know its all a scam. but legally its just an unpaid bill. with a yet to begin civil case to determine fraud. and then a criminal case to punish fraud.

its the whole tax avoidance/tax evasion difference, where avoidance is legally allowed and civil. and evasion is criminal
ATO has to first determine avoidance vs evasion.
so again. once passed a certain date the ATO cant then go after him civilly to then try him criminally.
and thats wht this ira drama is playing out.. the deadline for civil. to avoid paying bill.
and then have the partnership ratified to avoid criminal. by then saying yea we got a bill and the company is solid. but you took too long to demand payment so we dont have to pay now.

hopefully your getting the many layers of CSW games now
and i hope this time you realise that this case will not end in a 'liquidation' order. because judges dont ask for that by default/automatic practice.
otherwise thousands of businesses would get shutdown and employees lose jobs. just over co-founder disputes.

this case. by actual words from ira's team is requesting that dave be included in a partnership. solidifying the partnership into a legal entity by doing so.

all the money talk is outside the courtroom. and not going to be CSW coffin nail

maybe start by googling
adjunct vs adjuvants
(not essential/supplement/junk additive) vs (essential/enhancing/catalyst additives)

then you will realise that there is a difference
then do some research about how 'monkey kidneys' have not even been a thing for ~50 years so kids today have no worries..
.. well unless your the 51+yo kid in question


..
then look at the amount of ingrediants (microlitre values) in a vaccine and then google that 'ingrediant' in comparison to how much of it is contained in daily food/drink.

then come back once you have some answers.

please atleast while your having this independant thought moment. spend some time within those thoughts to do some proper research outside your cultish websites.

you may learn something. instead of just repeating a cultish narrative.
you may even be surprised by the less hostility you receive by actually doing more independant thinking/research

lets see..

(research spoiler: theres more of these 'ingredients' in a weeks food than a lifetime of vaccines)
(research spoiler: mercury was never in MMR or chickenpox vaccines or other similar childhood vaccines)
(research spoiler: white-bread/non-organic veg contains more mercury than a vaccine. but you can just ask for a mercury free vaccine)
(research spoiler: your cultish websites are not looking to heal kids. they want folowers to buy THEIR chemical supplements, so the cutish people can work at home and not get proper jobs. by deceiving people into handing them money on trust without proper credability, just scare tactics)
(research spoiler: when cultish leaders try to tell its flock that the world is a scary place out to kill them. and the only safe place is to hand the cultish leaders money/assets/devotion. and do the influencers bidding. you start to see the real agenda)

and thats the pitfull you are falling into

we in the entire community know CSW is a pennyless scammer that never created or mined bitcoin pre2013
thats not in dispute.. apart from you and nutty's, and a couple others flip flops unsure/trolling thoughts.

what is actually ocurring is that ira's team is NOT calling out CSW as a pennyless scammer that duped dave into a pennyless scam. IRA's NOT fighting to clear daves name and get out/detach daves reputation from being 50% liable of the ATO and other scams.. ira's not seeking damages from CSW for trying to pull in dave into CSW's scam

instead ira's team ARE trying to ratify that there was a partnership and it has assets.
again they are not arguing who then should buy out who from that ratified partnership. they just both want to have it validated that there was a partnership which included bitcoin IP as its asset

..
but hey. you can play theories and if's and maybes.
but ira's requests for validation during the deposition/discovery stage. is very much tactics that CSW would play. its a similar play as the SLAPP tactic. get the desired outcome before the case has even started.

CSW wins even if IRA wins. as the only true costs CSW would pay is just the lawyers costs of both sides.
which i deem CSW has already conned his 'money guys' into covering as the cost of doing business to get a judge validated title. which can then be used in future SLAPP cases which he promises profits to his 'money guys'

but hey.
show me where IRA's team has said CSW is a pennyless scammer that had nothing to do with bitcoin pre2013 and just tried to con dave into a scam..(your assumptions of what this case actually is)

i do get it
we in the community know the actual scamminess of CSW. we know he was not involved in bitcoin pre2013. yes we wish IRA was a plaintiff of a case that called CSW out on his scams..
yes we wish IRa was trying to call detach any linkage to any partnership by showing there was not bitcoin business pre 2013
but the only stuff IRA is calling out on is the stall tactics within the case of not just coming out as bitcoins creator as promised/sooner.
thus ira's team is very much playing into the game of wanting CSW to be announced as bitcoins creator
.
i do get it
we all want CSW punished..
but that aint gonna happen. IRA is not making direct demand for 410k coin and asking the judge for a prison term punishment if CSW doesnt pay. heck even the judge said this case is not about awarding coins or proving who or where the coins are to then award.
this is not what the case is about. its not the coins.
its not even about who was typing at the computer to decide identity. its the 'title' and rights of being the creators of bitcoin.
(where by the judge would then let them both debate over the share of who was the identity and who should buy out who outside of court)

i do get it
CSW is a scammer and there is no asset. no coins nothing actually in reality to share. but inside the courtroom. is a different thing entirely

CSW likes this because while the trust ownership/validity is in question the ATO are stuck. even they cant proceed without it being validated that CSW is the owner of the scam. or if the scam was a scam
CSW likes this because the 2-3years delay allows him time to escape the statute of limitations of the current CIVIL case of non payment of ATO tax. which once outside the limitation period. the ATO cant then file criminal charges of evasion.
CSW likes this because ira is validating CSW claims by saying there was a partnership. meaning it keeps his 'money guys' happily funding CSW's many games while keeping the ATO at arms length

windfury might have had a valid shower thought...if

..if it didnt turn out to be just another fantasy involving a certain group of guys he loves that already have too much centralised responsibility.

maybe next time think decentralisation. not 'which guy do i love the most and think id want' when in the shower

wait
is badecker for once having an independant thought
is badecker finally grasping that its not actually the vaccine, but the adjunct ingredients in the mixture

wow. id never expected to see the day where badecker peels his mind away from his influencers that are virus deniers.

good on you badecker. a clear independent and actually relevant question to ask
scrw it. ill even give you some merit for this fluke event of an actual real valid question coming from you
but dont let it go to your head

meanwhile whilst badeckers 'influencers' tell him campfire stories that everyone is maybe super human. and only if they subscribe and donate they can definetly be superhuman

reality is that the ICU hospitals bed capacity in his OWN HOME STATE is on the rise.
70% at the start of april
90% this week
the ventilator treatment requirement is on the rise
20% at start of april
50% this week

does he think magical unicorns will just give birth to new beds once it hits 100% capacity

heck even basic maths a 12yo could do can show that the amount of spread so far is low. and that more spread at more cases per week = more need for hospital care

but this idiot will instead will think he is immortal because his influencer has the magic wand,, so the idiot will just promote his cultish youtube influencer.. not realising his influencer just wants people to buy his endorsements

it costs nothing to stand at a distance and keep yourself safe, but being told to stay safe you need to buy these influencers products and services. just shows who's scamming who

china didnt lie
even as early as january they were saying uts corona virus...
why.
because they compared it to loads of SIMILAR varients they collected over the years to recognise it as the corona family and not, say the ebola family

the samples from 2014-2017 were not exact matches. so covid-19 strain was not around in 2014

science with actual trained people diagnosing

VS
questionaire to herbal remedy loving parents asking:
do they think their kid is:
[ ] autistic
[✓] their special lil munchkin


and badecker thinks if a parents ticks 'their lil munchkin. then suddenly thats enough to be badecker science proof

funny part is where are the 666 questionaires 'court proof' signed under penalty of perjury to which badecker always demands..
oh wait he doesnt want proof for things that favour his cults beliefs

problem with gmax is.
he thinks he is THE judge of all courts, where gmax has the power himself to auto dismiss any bitcoin related cases no matter where, when or by whom they are filed by. (unless its blockstream and then its ok)

but it is a shame gmax didnt use his secret power 2 years ago to dismiss the IRA/CSW case
oops did gmax forget this case didnt get dismissed.. oh well that debunks gmaxs claims that bitcoin related cases get auto dismissed.

yes we all get it many cases should have got thrown out years ago.. yes we know many cases are just a sham.. but dont expect instant dismissals because the community outside the courtroom know its a sham



one week on and you forgot the pdf link and the screen shot of ira's teams actual request
shame on you
its clear and in writing and logged into case records that he wants what CSW wants.(a partnership involving bitcoins creation deemed as fact)

you cant change legal or written history by just making a post saying 'fantasy' and 'pretend' or i ignored a forum user to hide your ignorance
by you not referring to it/avoiding talking about it. doesnt mean it didnt happen. it just means YOU are unaware of the facts of whats really going on

next time read the documents and show me that it never had a request from ira's team asking for a default judgement that finds that the partnership and the creation of bitcoin by the partnership be deemed fact
....oh wait you cant

^ you flip that its impossible

v then you flop
yep many ways to get around the prior art thing. even flimsy enough to atleast get a court to not auto-dismiss
1. claim you invented it a couple years early then prior art date and then sue people pretending they too were involved before then and stole your idea to ruin your financial potential by making it freeware without your consent. thus seeking damages
2. using the limitations that gmax knows the MIT doesnt immortally protect bitcoin for. and obviously wanted people to be protected by handing their alterations to blockchain. under the DPL

really? so a case right now running for about 2 years. dealing with bitcoins IP claims.. has been auto-dismissed.
seems like its still playing out. and still going to cause drama untill atleast october.
or are you going to pretend this whole case is not playing out 'coz franky said its playing out makes it now fiction'

instead of trying to play my forum words. try reading the legal documents of ira's teams words. like i asked many times already

how can blockstream even have or try to obtain patents.. oh wait we both know they can gmax has done this
kinda funny that.

flip 'no one can patent bitcoin or any future element/alteration' flop 'apart from blockstream'
flop 'gmax has filed blockstream patents of bitcoin tech and offered other licences'

again patent trolling is not about getting to the final trial victory parade. its about atleast getting a foot in the door at a party so that you can slapp everyone at the party. before the music even begins
by atleast getting on the guest list with a court endorsed document opens many doors

first of all
campaign fear: 'mandatory vaccinations before end 2020'

reality check. there is no mandatory vaccination plan.
  1. there is no vaccine yet
  2. there wouldnt even be enough vaccines to even offer it to everyone
  3. not everyone needs them

..
second of all
campaign win: when governments try to debunk claims of mandatory vaccinations by saying they wont happen
the cults will class that as their win where they fought hard for that result.

meanwhile reality is that it was never even a battle to fight. and cults just want to look like they done something and then ask for donations/buy there herbs and supplements

...
whats next
cults advocating to cull all unicorns.. and when theres an announcement that there are no unicorns alive.. cults class that as their advocacy winning that fight