|
Image distortion proves globe Earth again, I mean fuck that missing 380' amirite?
|
|
|
|
  Lake Pontchartrain NO curve. Flat EARTH video. -- https://youtu.be/bD0WCdgl1PYThat's video of the shore on the other side, these metabunk clowns are debunked by their own curvature calculator. With refraction included in the calculations they're unable to explain the missing "hump" of water that should block the view of the shore. In the images linked on metabunk.org the row of towers curve to the side and convergence reduces their size. This configuration and limited perspective creates the illusion the towers descend into the water. However with a Nikon P900 zoom lens and change in vantage points we can clearly see there's no curvature at all. bump.  "what you're seeing here is a mirage" |
|
|
|
^^^ Gravity causes the bridge to undergo a Lorentz contraction reducing its length by exactly 380 feet.   |
|
|
|
''I believe in proven facts which are proven earth is flat & stationary'' How do you know, were you told? Did you actually perform the experiments yourself or are you just believing someone else like you said we do?
 Balance, it's not the sixth sense Hollywood wants you to buy. bonus image:  |
|
|
|
^^^ Their hero and savior Elon Musk is going to send them on an ionic rocket to Mars, and they're going search for fossilized martian flowers. Once they've found their flower they'll join hands and sing kum ba yah around the OLED they're growing their red potatoes with.  |
|
|
|
Your words say "(((we))) can prove repeatedly that the earth is a globe" but there's no truth to them. I can demonstrate that the Earth is stationary with a gyroscope, I can measure angles on a plane with a sextant and, I can show the pull of gravity is a farce with a slinky drop.
You can demonstrate whatever you want. Put a ruler on the ground and demonstrate the earth is flat. We've know for 2,000 years the earth is a globe. You need to leave your house before you can tell me what color the sky is. Putting a ruler on the ground doesn't demonstrate the Earth is flat on any significant scale, measuring it with a sextant does. Also everybody knew the Earth is flat and stationary for last 2,000 years, it's only recently that the globe was force fed to the unwashed masses. There is no '''we''', your '''arguments''' are ridiculous and your '''facts''' are wrong. |
|
|
|
slowing down is acceleration
No, that's called deceleration. Acceleration is change in velocity over time. So deceleration can also be called acceleration. The same thing as calling a square a rectangle. Both are correct - one is just more specific. rotation is acceleration
Angular acceleration - not the same thing.  This is an orange:  This is a Mandarin orange:  - not the same thing.  People like to comment how the Bible was written by men all-be-it inspired by God. However, there is one section that was in fact written by the hand of God himself; the 10 commandments.
The bible is just a collection of myths that were prevalent at the time. If you actually read it, you would see it parallels other religious beliefs at the time. There is nothing new in the bible. Your god is just a fairy tale, as is your belief in a flat planet. The CGI images of fake globe Earth produced by NASA are in direct violation of the ten commandments (#2, Exodus 20:4-6) given to man by God.
There you go. We can prove repeatedly that the earth is a globe - if it is a contradiction that means your god is made up. There is no way you can prove your god exists. Your words say "(((we))) can prove repeatedly that the earth is a globe" but there's no truth to them. I can demonstrate that the Earth is stationary with a gyroscope, I can measure angles on a plane with a sextant and, I can show the pull of gravity is a farce with a slinky drop. You have manufactured images of Earth taken by masonfags (Leviticus 20:13,23, Psalm 5:5, Psalm 11:5, Malachi 1:1-3, Romans 9:11-13, Matthew 7:13,23, John 12:39-40, 1 Peter 2:8, Jude 4, Revelation 13:8, 20:15, 21:27) on their way to the Moon in a cardboard box. bonus video: A Serious Question for NASA - Part IV - Orange Juice -- https://youtu.be/1drmX85X-b4 |
|
|
|
|
People like to comment how the Bible was written by men all-be-it inspired by God. However, there is one section that was in fact written by the hand of God himself; the 10 commandments.
#2: "Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments." -- Exodus 20:4-6
The CGI images of fake globe Earth produced by NASA are in direct violation of the ten commandments given to man by God.
|
|
|
|
''Rockets travel at 18.5K Miles per hour to leave Earth ( With People INside)'' And your point is?
If they can't understand gravity, they probably won't understand acceleration either. :/ Speeding up is acceleration, slowing down is acceleration and, rotation is acceleration. Traveling at a constant speed is NOT acceleration. Gravity is a fictitious force that misappropriates actions caused ultimately by electrical forces (Coulombs Law) in order to support the heliocentric argument, an idea that falls apart with basic scientific and logical criticism. The Earth is stationary, neither accelerating nor traveling at a constant velocity. |
|
|
|
|
^^^ Imagine being so delusional and retarded to think heavy balls balls in garden shed viewed through a hole drilled in side with a telescope proves the fictional force gravity is real. The nature of electrostatics and the coulomb force on the heavy balls completely invalidates the results.
Also I've made it clear that electrostatics and coulomb force makes density and buoyancy work, you're just pissing into strong wind screaming gravity!
|
|
|
|
1. When an object is being electroplated, what makes the metal being applied move and stick the object? 2. When a DNA sequencer uses electromigration to create that nice DNA snapshot everybody will recognize, what motivates the DNA molecules to move into their respective positions? These are two examples of very similar electrical effects to what is being misattributed to the fictional force of gravity.   |
|
|
|
If you rub a balloon in your hair does it do "ani-gravity"? Answer yes,
Answer no. Its 100% explained by static electricity. you can pick up bits of paper and foil so your statement about charged objects is obviously wrong; objects are rising not falling in this case.
What are you talking about? This is all due to static electricity. I suggest you read up on it: https://www.education.com/activity/article/balloon-science-charge-balloon-stick/The coulomb force acts on the atmosphere that, in turn acts on the object, hence why density and buoyancy is used to explain how things fall.
You really don't understand how positive and negative charges work. Try again. There is no gravity; the falling object is ultimately explained by the medium it's in and the electrical forces acting on them. I also do understand that positive and negative charges are the result of polarization of a material. In the case of Earth it's the inner surface of the dome or firmament that's the source. |
|
|
|
^^^  If you rub a balloon in your hair does it do "ani-gravity"? Answer yes, you can pick up bits of paper and foil so your statement about charged objects is obviously wrong; objects are rising not falling in this case. The coulomb force acts on the atmosphere that, in turn acts on the object, hence why density and buoyancy is used to explain how things fall.  |
|
|
|
|
When asked why an object falls the globalist will tell you "gravity", he then proceeds to describe how an object falls with multiple volumes (Newton) of mathematical formulae without ever explaining the why. What causes gravity?
The FE explanation for how an object falls is density and buoyancy; the object sinks. The answer for why it is pushed down is because of electricity and the Coulomb Force.
|
|
|
|
^^^ "we don't have to do it this way" <--- It's obvious you don't want to be shot in the head.
15 deg/hr is enough you can visually perceive the platform rotating, the gyroscope isn't moving. This isn't manufactured evidence like the globe relies on.
Rather, one thing is obvious, and another is apparent. Apparently I don't even want to entertain your silly thinking. Obviously, the way the gyroscope behaves seems different at different latitudes.  The test is of a gyroscope and weather it (A.) rotates with a 15 deg/hr rotating platform or (B.) maintains its position in space, where it takes place is irreverent. The answer is B, go use this proven gyroscope at the equator if it suits your fancy, test the globe. If the Earth is rotating then it's rotating, if it's not then it's not and there's no detectable motion. You have to explain why the proven gyroscope can't detect any motion of the Earth. You can't claim it's not sensitive enough, that's not an available option. The answer is that the Sun is a small object relative to a stationary surface and that it travels across the sky just as it appears. Many people have shown that the sun is not a small object only a few thousand miles away. You haven't been able to refute my trig/parallax point. The fact that you are looking to do damage to people who have shown you where you are wrong, shows that you have a religious cult in your beliefs. Why? Because it hurts when you are wrong, and you want to get even with the people who you blame. But please don't go out and commit suicide just to get even with yourself, once you finally figure out where you are wrong. I've refuted it multiple times; the measurements for stellar parallax are smaller than the margin of error caused by refraction or star twinkle. You're not dealing with the gyroscopic observation that the Earth is stationary. Instead of valid reasons why no motion can be detected, you've decided to make "but what about this?" arguments, gaslight and concern troll. The Devil's left hand, is this the behavior of somebody who is right? |
|
|
|
^^^ "we don't have to do it this way" <--- It's obvious you don't want to be shot in the head.
15 deg/hr is enough you can visually perceive the platform rotating, the gyroscope isn't moving. This isn't manufactured evidence like the globe relies on.
Rather, one thing is obvious, and another is apparent. Apparently I don't even want to entertain your silly thinking. Obviously, the way the gyroscope behaves seems different at different latitudes. The test is of a gyroscope and whether it (A.) rotates with a 15 deg/hr rotating platform or (B.) maintains its position in space, where it takes place is irreverent. The answer is B, go use this proven gyroscope at the equator if it suits your fancy, test the globe. If the Earth is rotating then it's rotating, if it's not then it's not and there's no detectable motion. You have to explain why the proven gyroscope can't detect any motion of the Earth. You can't claim it's not sensitive enough, that's not an available option. The answer is that the Sun is a small object relative to a stationary surface and that it travels across the sky just as it appears. |
|
|
|
|
^^^ "we don't have to do it this way" <--- It's obvious you don't want to be shot in the head.
15 deg/hr is enough you can visually perceive the platform rotating, the gyroscope isn't moving. This isn't manufactured evidence like the globe relies on.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm trying to figure why you so stubbornly support the "official narrative" on basically every controversial subject Vod. Are you by chance, of Pakistani decent?
|
|
|
|
The question of whether the Earth is in motion could be settled at an observatory with large telescope.
It was settled a couple thousand years ago. Not according to comment sections on websites almost everywhere, there's a raging fire burning. Some of my research shows it wasn't until after world war 2 that the belief became wide spread in spite of the RCC and the Jesuits pushing globalism for 500 years. I'm sure wide spread use of the sextant made sure that faggots like Pythagoras didn't have the general public fooled into believing his mathematical slight of hand for thousands of years. The globe, as seen on TV! I bet your teachers, your priests, the brick layer and that nice Jewish lady down the street sold you too! |
|
|
|
|
The question of whether the Earth is in motion could be settled at an observatory with large telescope. With the telescope base set to rotate at 15 degrees per hour, a desktop sized precision mechanical gyroscope need only be placed on the rotating platform with its axis set horizontally.
The gyroscope is then observed maintaining its position in space and the speed of the rotating platform derived from this observation. Setting the gyroscope axis vertical to test the Earth's rotation isn't even necessary at this point as everybody in the room already knows the outcome.
Game over, summary execution.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
