They are not the best at creating grammar because I know there are a lot of mistakes with the structure. Additionally, sometimes it gives out wrong information, so you must also verify it. It may be grammatically correct, but it's still better to check it for yourself or use Grammarly to adjust it easily.

Addition to people interested in Grammarly, you can learn a lot more when you use the premium but it's quite expensive though. 

This is not the first time that it happened, we just need to be patient. That's why it's not completely being used every day because of this but I don't think it should because I'm a hodler lol.

I remember sending it before with at least 0.001 BTC I think. I'm not sure but that's just ludicrous if you compare it and convert it now lol.

I think you missed the part where it's 1 sat, not 100 sat and I think you have miscalculated the conversion for BTC. lol. But it's still better to have that 1 sat and double every day for a month

The campaign may want to have that effect of being spread in the forum, and that's why there are quotas in the specific campaign. That's not going to be your problem to bear. That's their choice as well. That's why there are posts about having campaign discretion that they can impose or remove participants not performing to their expectations.

It all depends on the user whether or not you have the right tools and applications for the specific things that you are doing. They are definitely at the ends of the spectrum and most of the time they are within their reasons and it's with the ecosystem that it has. I have an iPhone and that's my daily phone but I'm planning to get an Android as well and have both of them being used together.

It's all in your choice and the system that you want. I don't think it's garbage though.

It's like a workaround on how he is posting, not necessarily promoting the site but it's somewhat connected to it so you would be curious to what the site could be or something. Fair play. I tried checking the OPs "Topic Posted" but I don't see something exactly alike but it's like a ploy on the same topic, and promoting subtly with their sportsbook. Hmm.

When you liked yourself too much but you don't want 0.5 of your sMerit. Lol.

Haven't thought of this though but I know already that this is not going to work and is not worth it because you would get half of it remaining. Doesn't make sense.

Those tactics are for people who are quite new to the trading scene and are waiting just to get rekt. There are a lot of newbie traders that are going into the market head-on without any safety or any precautions before investing. They might lose everything in one swoop and that could really happen. I think we all have those days and the goal should be to prevent that.

The best way to win is to be consistent and not be emotionally attached towards the market sentiment.

So what you are trying to say is that the reasoning of OP could still have more of an effect in the future if that's not the recent case, based on what you are trying to say, right? What do you think it is? I believe a lot of people are trying to get back or need money and they are selling off now probably because of a need or something? It would be hard to quantify though.

If you don't have anything to do with your crypto, like you don't need to convert it immediately, buying more and staking it is okay. Earning more wouldn't hurt you and it's important that the coin that is trying to make money the right way and has researched this that it's correct and right.

It's always best to practice that it's your own custody and not on CEXs or something but it's definitely easier.

I believe that there are select coins that are worthy of being part of your portfolio or at least some backing towards why you want to have that specific coin in the first place. I think it's a great idea to know the important things of the coin before doing that and there are a lot of coins that could give you profit.

Personally, if you can do both, you should. Multiple streams of income are great and you can have more money coming in and maybe you can trade a lot more with having more with that. Unless you are satisfied already with that then go with it and focus on your trading balance and grow a lot more of it.

As long as you believe in it, you can for sure achieve it. Don't let others tell you otherwise.

I'm doing both and for the trading part, I let my trading bot run 24/7.

Maybe there are just some games that are not making money for the casinos and perhaps even losing money because of it. That can be a valid thing to remove the slot providers and it's within their discretion for sure.

Was it removed from other trustworthy sites as well?

Definitely, a risky thing to do, especially if it's not your money to spend on. You need to make something happen if you are going to invest somebody else's money; that will be a heavy responsibility if you manage that always.

That's only three years? That money could be somebody's life savings and be worth a lot more.
It's like $1.6M per year for stealing money.
$5M/3 years = $1.66M per year

I don't think the people affected would be satisfied with that.

You know that Market Makers are used to creating volume and not necessarily making profits, right? You can do this and cannot always make profits because of the possible fees you will get. You can only have assurance sometimes, then if you are put into the wrong position, you will lose money for that.

Saying that you can profit consistently is a red flag. Careful.

You know Bitcoin is the start of everything in the cryptocurrency world, right? If having 0.06 BTC is enough, everyone who started here would definitely have changed their lives for the better. I do hope that it would be enough for the world, at least to have that is already enough to live better. If that happens, remember where you started.

I think this is just the start and many traditional banks will follow. Imagine the people who predict that Bitcoin is going to $100,000. A recent announcement came from a traditional bank and they are famous and with their statement, a lot of people probably have managed to buy and really believed in that idea. I do hope that it can come to fruition and continue to have that kind of power and backing from everyone. A lot of people would be rich just by holding BTC as well.

I believe that I'm the type of investor that is a research investor. I make sure that I'm doing the right thing by knowing what I am investing in. It's going to still be a risk but at least I have convinced myself that it's going to be an ideal position for someone looking to invest. It's better to know what is going on rather than nothing at all.

I don't think that Ponzi Scheme investors are worth it, they are just losing money if they aren't able to let people buy their "products" and they are just going to lose their investments faster.

That kind of mindset is going to be harmful to anyone and make sure that he will continue with what he wants. He is only thinking of himself, and no matter what he does, it's only rooted in one thing: gambling. It's essential to control yourself and not attach yourself to it so you wouldn't think of despicable ways to continue it. That is mad.

Expand the income or buy to have the "possible increase" in value in assets? It allows you to add the possibility of earning more instead of just holding fiat. You are probably talking about those early investors and believers of Bitcoin that became Big because of holding Bitcoin in the first place. I think it has more potential than we have now; we have to wait.