Juan Guaido declared himself new Prince Harry.
good for bitcoin?
|
|
|
[6000...12500] almost completely covered, except for 2 open slots:
6101-6150
8501-8550
|
|
|
It is always the same. If the game is started during a downtrend most "predictions" are too low, if during an uptrend, sky high. Always.
Not really. Last game started 3 months ago, in the middle of downtrend, and still... only 30% predictions under 10k, 70% predictions over 10k. Downtrend continued, and the price went down from 82xx to 71xx.
|
|
|
I'm here!
Thanks 1miau!
Will send you a PM a bit later.
|
|
|
8701-8750
Thanks Mic!
P.S. I think the sliding-down trend will end soon, and 2020 might be a year of steady growth, similar to 2016, approximately following the "2x per year" support line. It would put the price somewhere around 8600, but I'm feeling optimistic, so rounding this UP to the next available slot.
|
|
|
I think it was possible to predict the approximate [6200...8100] range, assuming the sliding-down trend would continue (as it did) for 3 more months, but it would be harder to guess where we would end up within the range.
|
|
|
Most indicators are telling me we're going down. Hash Ribbons is telling me the bottoms in on a long-term scale.
I wish my name was Hash Ribbons. Such a cool name.
|
|
|
Damn it, we're in that cursed 7xxx range since Nov 21... not counting short-lived dips... that's more than a month.
I feel it's time to leave.
Hopefully we'll move to 8xxx and soon!
|
|
|
I want to see 8000 this year.
|
|
|
Love that little Kermit guy from Star Trek. So cute!
First Monaco puns, then this... I see you're having a good time.
|
|
|
Finally, something green...
|
|
|
Hopefully less than that... I really want to retire at the end of 2021.
|
|
|
"You" proved nothing. Investigating Bidens still makes sense.
|
|
|
Right, so now you're assuming Joe Biden is corrupt...
The threshold to start the investigation is pretty low. I don't have to assume he's 100% guilty. Just probable cause or reasonable suspicion, maybe even less. Just the facts we know about Bidens... it's very fishy. The framework governing U.S. diplomacy and foreign policy standards cares. You should care too. Trump should have cared, but he didn't, and he paid for it. The framework and foreign policy standards are for diplomats working for the State Department. U.S. President is above the State Department. He can conduct foreign policy any way he likes.
|
|
|
It was more symbolic than anything, but at least now maybe future presidents will think twice before asking foreign leaders to investigate their political rivals.
Nothing's wrong with investigating Biden. He shouldn't be above the law just because he's running for President. Should a sitting American president be asking another, newly elected president to investigate his political rival during what was supposed to be a congratulatory phone call? There are separate diplomatic channels for that. The problem is Trump thinks he can get away with anything. He was just proven wrong about that. The difference is you think the word investigate means make stuff up. I think it means uncover the truth. I don't care who's asking who to investigate who, as long as we uncover the truth about corrupt politicians. Diplomatic channels? Who cares.
|
|
|
Trump finally impeached. He belongs to yet another very exclusive club now.
It was rare, because the old standard required impeachment to be bi-partisan. Now that the threshold is lowered, expect every new president to be impeached, on a pure partisan basis. It was more symbolic than anything, but at least now maybe future presidents will think twice before asking foreign leaders to investigate their political rivals.
Nothing's wrong with investigating Biden. He shouldn't be above the law just because he's running for President.
|
|
|
Oh. I see it's time to leave WO for a while. Nothing good for next 10 pages or so.
|
|
|
|