Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 12:07:13 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 [59] 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 »
1161  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com on: June 24, 2014, 07:09:18 AM

you missed the part where they built a massive 'datorhall' with intent to build two more, then?  Cheesy


Anyone have source on this?

They're really f*cking the customers well
It seems like the logical next step to me.

However, it doesnīt really matter who deploys the massive DCs (except for the few remaining KNC customers who rightfully feel betrayed).

Fact is, there will be much more big deployment in the future, both with Bitfury, Asicminer and KNC devices.

Asicminer needs to sell in order to get NRE back, Bitfury and KNC should be swimming in money, but still they can make more.

Isnīt this the normal course of things?
1162  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com on: June 24, 2014, 07:04:40 AM
No you don't if you colocate your unit: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=622998.0


With expensive hosting (>$0.1/kwh) how can miners who buy overpriced hardware possibly compete with mining operations like datatank with much cheaper hardware and hosting costs less than $0.025/kwh?
The hosting isnīt expensive, (some of it) is a good rate for such high density deployments.

At first glance it might be expensive compared to running your miner at home, but even @home you need to factor in the used space, one-time expenses like AC, etc.
Finally, deploying at home scales much less easily.

The reason why you buy expensive hardware is because datatank isnīt around yet with a deployed mine, therefore there is no pressure for miners to look for maximized efficiency.

While DataTank might have 10MW online in 3-6months, it will be only a very small percentage of the network, still enabling less efficient (in terms of OpCost) miners to profit.

I am all for DataTank, as it seems to be a no-brainer with such low operational cost and a modular DC design.
It is an investment though, and the infrastructure (aka DataTank) will need around 9 months to break even with an aircooled device. After that you can REAP profits though, no doubt about it.
1163  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: 0.5% fees - Central Cavern P2Pool Nodes - EU - IS - IL on: June 23, 2014, 07:19:26 PM
I put the tekchain folder into the AppData folder.

It seems to have worked, as it is now syncing the blocks fast.

Thanks for your help!
1164  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: 0.5% fees - Central Cavern P2Pool Nodes - EU - IS - IL on: June 23, 2014, 07:09:35 PM
If i go to the TEK website, there is an option to download the windows and linux client, aswell as the blockchain.

MY wallet is stuck at synchronizing but hasnīt sincd one single block yet.

Therefore i hoped i could simply download the block history and manually load it into the client (why else would you be able to download it from the download page manually?)
1165  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: 0.5% fees - Central Cavern P2Pool Nodes - EU - IS - IL on: June 23, 2014, 06:55:52 PM
If i run the TEK wallet in windows and have downloaded the blockchain manually, how do i make tek load it?
1166  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [ANN] Spondoolies-Tech - Best W/GH/s ratio, Best $/GH/s ratio on: June 23, 2014, 06:34:24 PM
No, it was moved.

@spondoolies

It is (sometimes) customary to post a short notice when you move parts of the thread into a new one.

Maybe it was a mod though.
1167  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: 0.5% fees - Central Cavern P2Pool Nodes - EU - IS - IL on: June 23, 2014, 06:23:20 PM
Wonīt you get massive variance from such a small TEK pool?
1168  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: 0.5% fees - Central Cavern P2Pool Nodes - EU - IS - IL on: June 23, 2014, 06:08:38 PM
Is the Tekcoin pool a p2pool node?

If yes, where is it located?

no it is MPOS on PPLNS so latency isn't an issue
What is MPOS?
1169  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: 0.5% fees - Central Cavern P2Pool Nodes - EU - IS - IL on: June 23, 2014, 06:01:37 PM
Is the Tekcoin pool a p2pool node?

If yes, where is it located?
1170  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / SP30 Cost recouping was Re: [ANN] Spondoolies-Tech - Best W/GH/s ratio, Best $/GH/s ratio on: June 23, 2014, 04:36:16 PM
a September SP30 won't ROI at all at the price it is sitting at.

+1


Estimated Next Difficulty:   16,899,830,784 (+25.53%)

What are the chances of the August SP30 buyers getting a ROI ?
Nobody knows.

I hope your electricity price is low though.

At the end of the day nobody can tell you how high your return will be, but lower hardware price and power cost are always nice.

If you think you will get a better antminer by September, just buy it then.

1171  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / SP30 Cost recouping was Re: [ANN] Spondoolies-Tech - Best W/GH/s ratio, Best $/GH/s ratio on: June 23, 2014, 03:23:20 PM
While i think sp30s should atleast break even (barring catastophic circumstances), i think calculating with a profit of 100% is unfounded.

There will most likely be profit, but (with stable bitcoin price and no massively deployed 0.2W/GH miner in the next 6 months) I would guesstimate more around 10%-40% is realistic, denominated in fiat.

Please keep in mind that estimating future difficulty, atleast more than 5-6 months into the future is pure vodoo.
1172  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [ANN] Spondoolies-Tech - Best W/GH/s ratio, Best $/GH/s ratio on: June 23, 2014, 08:17:14 AM
I am actually eager to know when chips are scheduled to arrive at spondooliesīfacilities.

Is it mid July?
1173  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [ANN] Spondoolies-Tech - Best W/GH/s ratio, Best $/GH/s ratio on: June 23, 2014, 08:16:01 AM
I hope Guy will get some good news in Eastern asia. There is a noticeable drop of posting/enthusiasm here, no doubt because of the crazy ASIC deployment in the last few days.
I would assume atleast around 6PH is from KnC alone though.

They have atleast 3PH refunded units plus the ones they ordered for their own mine to deploy, so this estimate is actually low.

i'm fairly sure the 'refunded' units went directly to their PH farm of 28mm modules (I'm sure the 20mm boards snap in nicely what i would do)

so why return equip 'refunded' if it is already in the pipeline and you can refund and re-direct to your large PH farm....i think folks are gonna be shocked
how much they are gonna get of the network

(hope I'm wrong)

Searing

That is actually what I said (atleast meant to say).

They ordered atleast the same for themselves, and now they have additional units that customers didnīt want to own.
1174  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [600 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: June 23, 2014, 08:05:25 AM
So if you have 3 nodes on servers, with high bandwidth, manually peering them so every node has atleast two peers should give you a very good performance?

Is bandwidth the limiting factor on peers or is it ping time?
1175  Economy / Securities / Re: [HAVELOCK] DataTank Mining: 1.2MW 3M Novec Immersion Cooled 2PH Mining Container on: June 23, 2014, 07:57:02 AM
Thank you for clarifying, looking forward to the news Smiley

I have a question:

Assuming one would have limited funds available (duh) at this moment in time, would it be possible to buy B shares (ie without asics) now and pay for the hardware in around 2 months?

This should allow for deployment of hardware within the same timeframe as "normal" A shares.

Would that be a possibility?
1176  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: H/w Hosting Directory & Reputation on: June 23, 2014, 07:06:31 AM
For anyone with hosted units in Iceland, is.centralcavern.uk:9332/static/ is a p2pool node located inside Thor Datacenter.

I have a ping of under 1ms to it, and pings from Iceland should be excellent.

This is the first p2pool node in Iceland afaik.

1177  Economy / Securities / Re: [HAVELOCK] DataTank Mining: 1.2MW 3M Novec Immersion Cooled 2PH Mining Container on: June 23, 2014, 06:26:30 AM
Quote
PLEASE, make things clear: (1) if we give You say until June, 30 the sum of $870 000 as You ask for 1 container, when it will be ready and (2) when ASICminer chips could start mining in container if we give You
$2 112 000 until June, 30 as You ask for one container fully deployed with chips?

This is in the prospectus. It takes between 3-6 months for full deployment. The longer it takes the cheaper hardware per GH gets (OR you receive more efficient hardware, perhaps from spondoolies, or another GEN....)

As hardware will only be bought (produced) once the date for DataTank deployment should be fairly firm, the cost and efficiency can only be determined then.

However, for a best prediction of cost, DTMA holders are asked to pay a fee per kW now, which shouldnīt change as much as the price per GH over time, when more power efficient equipment becomes available.


As i hopefully described comprehensively, it is less relevant when the actual Tank will be ready, as the hardware prices at the time of deployment will be used for calculating the cost per GH.
1178  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Boycot KNC on: June 23, 2014, 06:17:13 AM
Nobody is "still" ordering from that place.

I suspect they had a higher than 50% refund rate on their Neptunes, which also gives them around 3PH more to deploy in their DC than what they had originally planned.

Their price is and always has been outrageously high.

With all the different, more professional manufacturers shipping, they will not be able to sell much more of their product to customers.

However, at this point they simply donīt care, as they are now in the Bitcoin Datacenter creation business.
1179  Economy / Securities / Re: [HAVELOCK] DataTank Mining: 1.2MW 3M Novec Immersion Cooled 2PH Mining Container on: June 23, 2014, 06:01:19 AM
Quote
They are not selling individual GH nor for that price. Each share represents about 17GH and costs about $17. Also there is no such thing as an antminer A2 and there is also no miner for less than $1/gh (or not that I am aware of). Also I am 99% sure you do not pay $0.025/kwh so there's that.

Electricity cost in WA state for Datacenter use goes for 3-4ct/kWh, so I am quite confident that described rates can be achieved.

In any case, it is much lower than traditional hosting and is also more power efficient (cooling).
1180  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [ANN] Spondoolies-Tech - Best W/GH/s ratio, Best $/GH/s ratio on: June 22, 2014, 07:57:02 PM
I hope Guy will get some good news in Eastern asia. There is a noticeable drop of posting/enthusiasm here, no doubt because of the crazy ASIC deployment in the last few days.
I would assume atleast around 6PH is from KnC alone though.

They have atleast 3PH refunded units plus the ones they ordered for their own mine to deploy, so this estimate is actually low.
Pages: « 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 [59] 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!