Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 07:12:57 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 [60] 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 »
1181  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com on: June 22, 2014, 07:27:10 PM
This shit is crazy.... It really looks like they are mining with our machines RIGHT NOW.
I can think of no other way that hashpower could possibly magically appear

Looks like a BFL replay...   https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=659828.0
The drama of it all....  Holy Swashbucklers.

There is nothing magical about it.

They had atleast the same number of miners on order than the amount they presold.

As more than half of their customers refunded, they now have atleast 9PH ready to deploy.
1182  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: I made a free Bitcoin mining monitor service (More pool support added) on: June 22, 2014, 06:09:24 PM
Will p2pool be added soon?
1183  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com on: June 22, 2014, 05:53:28 PM
Apologies if this was answered previously, I'm very far behind on this thread.

From what I've read a Neptune is 5 boxes and draws 2100 watts and each box has 1 PCI-e 6-pin power cable, that means that each single power cable is 420 watts, when a 6-pin is rated at 75 watts.  I know I've been running a November board and October boards at 190 to 200 watts on a single cable, and they get warm.... is there some mistake about the 1 PCI-e cable to power a 420 watt chip???

Technically the Neptune's boxes draw a total of ~1900W if you factor in AC/DC efficiency.  Molex's PCI-E keyed parts are rated for 8A per pin, so ~24A.  Which, at 12V gives you a rated operational power level of 288W.  However, in reality when you load things 24/7 you should de-rate them by 80%, so really any competent EE would not have these connectors drawing over ~230W (~19A @ 12V) in this type of application.  Now, we don't know the part number of the plug that KnC used, and some of Molex's Mini-fit Jr plugs handle up to 13A a pin which would allow ~468W running at their rating.  De-rate that and you're at ~375W which is just shy of each cubes ~380W draw.

TL;DR: There's 1 PCI-E cable per box, so yes: shitty Engineering.
They just donīt give a shit, as their main deployment of these devices will be their DCs.

With an ambient air temperature of ~0°C-15°C (depending on time of year) they are quite sure that THEIR connectors wonīt overheat.

Now, i would be careful to run these at 30-35°C ambient temperature, as the wires will more easily start electrical fires then.
1184  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [600 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: June 22, 2014, 05:26:22 PM
How does the peering system work and what do incoming and outgoing peers do?

Are the outgoing peers downloading the sharechain from you because they havenīt got the complete list?

What happens when your node has no ingoing peers?


Does your peernetwork automatically grow with your nodesīonline time?

I read somewhere that you can also "force" your node to peer with a certain other node, is there a benefit in that?

Does a bigger peer network mean less orphaned shares? (as the found share should be distributed faster around the p2pool network)

1185  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official BITMINE CoinCraft series 28nm ASIC miners thread on: June 22, 2014, 05:15:35 PM
However, as a business Bitmine has to manage the risk involved in production and R&D.

They have to take steps to ensure customers funds can be returned in the event of failure, that is what a companyīs share capital or Investor money is for.

I am quite sure they have more than enough funds available, as they sold miners at 5$ per GH...

At this point in time they are lucky when people settle for their owed money back, as swiss contract law does allow people to claim resulting damages from not fulfilling a contract.

If at any point it becomes obvious that certain safety margins werenīt met, one might be able to sue for fraud.

1186  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com on: June 22, 2014, 04:53:47 PM
Well, with my estimate of more than half of the neptune orders refunded (because more than half the miners can do basic maths) and some people who went for the frankenjupiters,
they have easily got 1000+ Neptunes to simply install in their DC.
1187  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANN: BITMAIN has Tested Its 28nm Bitcoin Mining Chip BM1382 on: June 22, 2014, 04:27:28 PM
So all the smaller gridseeds too
I have 4 and they mine 1.3khs still have not swiched them off or sell them as they dont
consume much electrons.....
and Love the red and green lights!!!
Waiting a fury to be delivered will have more colors as the fury is blue
Electrons are not consumed when using electricity Wink
1188  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [600 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: June 22, 2014, 03:46:12 PM
Thanks, so if you had the no-submit-stale option turned on, it wouldnīt submit valid Bitcoin blocks that are not considered a valid share?

Isnīt there some mechanism every node immediatly recognizes a valid block as such, as every node runs the full Bitcoin client?

I could be wrong here since it's been so long since I've mined on a p2pool with block times (ed: *over* a minute that is) under a minute, but I think it only detects the stale shares after a block.... but all shares should be submitted, as some share that's detected as stale (say, 1ms to 500ms late) could easily win an orphan race, esp. vs some of the pools that aren't set up quite right (propagate their blocks slowly).

from personal experience, I've had a share that was detected as DOA solve a bitcoin block, back in 2012
Thanks again. Is the option to not send invalid shares in your miner or on the node?
It seems like it should be a setting in the miner...
1189  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [600 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: June 22, 2014, 03:29:43 PM
Thanks, so if you had the no-submit-stale option turned on, it wouldnīt submit valid Bitcoin blocks that are not considered a valid share?

Isnīt there some mechanism every node immediatly recognizes a valid block as such, as every node runs the full Bitcoin client?
1190  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [600 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: June 22, 2014, 03:20:33 PM
Hey guys, i have a technical question concerning p2pool.

While shares can quite easily be DOA because of the ~60times faster sharechain, found bitcoin blocks shouldnīt become dead/orphaned that quickly, as they are then broadcast on to the Bitcoin network.

So what happens, when my found share would be a Bitcoin block but the p2pool node considers it a "late" share? Is it still passed on to the Bitcoin network?

1191  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [ANN] Central Cavern P2Pool Node Launched! on: June 22, 2014, 02:45:17 PM
DOA rates (for shares) at Bitcoin p2pools are however atleast 2.5%.

Reducing the ping from 40ms to under 1ms improved my DOA rate from ~5% to 2.5%.

The main thing you should look out for is that your DOA rate is lower than the average P2Pool rate, as you will produce less invalid shares, which will in turn increase your payout per block.

Am I correct in the assumption that only shares "expire" within the 10 second timeframe and found blocks donīt expire that fast?

1192  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [ANN] Central Cavern P2Pool Node Launched! on: June 22, 2014, 02:09:23 PM
Iceland node up and running!

Preliminary stats page:
Code:
http://192.71.218.197:9332/static/

Connect your miner to:

192.71.218.197:9332

The workername is your Bitcoin address.

EXCELLENT ping from Thor Datacenter (Advania).


1193  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com on: June 22, 2014, 12:18:08 PM
Yeah, they must have a shitload one thosuand of their 20nm devices ready to deploy, as my guestimate is that more than half of their Neptune customers went for the refund.

They should be able to get around 15PH in one 10MW facility by now.
1194  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [ANN] Central Cavern P2Pool Node Launched! on: June 22, 2014, 12:07:51 PM
Are you coming home today or tomorrow  Cool

Tonight, but feel free to ask murdof to do the run command when he wakes from his afternoon nap. He has the login info Smiley
Yeah, sorry about nagging but i am actually so hyped by the low ping i got before, so i might just try to message him.
1195  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [ANN] Central Cavern P2Pool Node Launched! on: June 22, 2014, 11:08:08 AM
Are you coming home today or tomorrow  Cool
1196  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [ANN] Central Cavern P2Pool Node Launched! on: June 22, 2014, 10:13:35 AM
Canīt wait till the Iceland node will be up tomorrow Smiley

I am really looking forward to mining with such an excellent ping.

How is the downloading of the blockchain doing? Is everything on track?
1197  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Will any U.S. Manufacturer deliver 20nm this year? on: June 22, 2014, 08:58:20 AM
My bet is we probably won't see any actual 20nm boxes hitting anytime this year.  But by the middle of next year it's almost a certainty.
As already pointed out, knc is currently delivering 20nm miners.

However, they are terribly overpriced and get "only" 0.6W/GH, a figure that can be achieved on 28 nm.
1198  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Will any U.S. Manufacturer deliver 20nm this year? on: June 22, 2014, 07:23:28 AM
Sorry, i was half asleep when posting, obviously i meant US manufacturer, as stated in the topic.

My point still stands though, 20nm first of all is not optimal for Bitcoin asics, as it is only meant as an intermediary half-node on the way to 16nm.

Second, there is much optimisation to be done on 28nm and like US car companies (the big ones anyway), except maybe tesla (which is tiny), i doubt that any US manufacturer will come up with an efficient solution.
Maybe BFL really gets their claimed W/GH though, so i might be wrong on this one.

Spondoolies seems to be on a good path with their sp30 solution, which should get 0.45W/GH at the wall and is also professionally engineered.

KNC should get 0.6W/GH, but their price again is ridiculous, their business ethics are also highly questionable at this point.

What i am definately not wrong about is that both the (now bankrupt) HashFast and the always-late BFL shouldnīt be trusted in this game.
Their retail prices for home miners are furthermore outrageous, ROI with these is impossible.

Again,  their business ethics are nonexistant, so i wouldnīt order from them.

It seems like anywhere else in the world Bitcoin ASIC designs can be completed more or less on schedule, so i really hope these "bad" companies will go bankrupt in the longterm.
1199  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [600 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: June 22, 2014, 07:15:32 AM
Does anyone know where i can get the p2pool luck over ~ 1 year?
1200  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [600 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: June 21, 2014, 06:29:16 PM
sp30s should once again work with p2pool and 1000 6TH devices will be delivered in August.

Some of those will surely use p2pool.
Pages: « 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 [60] 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!