Im sure this has been answered but:
I invested in the ICO on day one to get the 20% bonus. Now I want to throw in a few more BTC. Can i send BTC to the shown BTC "address to pay" in my login account? Will the tokens just top up to my waves account?
Thanks in advance.
Yes Breasal you can invest all the times that you want on your ICO account.It takes 2 confirmations to receive the waves. Good luck!!  Thanks GreenMatrix and thanks also Digital_Currnacy_LTD! |
|
|
|
|
Im sure this has been answered but:
I invested in the ICO on day one to get the 20% bonus. Now I want to throw in a few more BTC. Can i send BTC to the shown BTC "address to pay" in my login account? Will the tokens just top up to my waves account?
Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
Those who invested in the ICO are able to sell in profit if they want.
Profit margin is shrinking. I imagine it will continue down to 2x or less. I'm curious if price will drop below ICO...good time to accumulate. |
|
|
|
Confirmed transaction...thank you! If only the devs would have thought to provide a few back up secure clusters!!!! |
|
|
|
Connected but can not send, no fees appears... can not send!! |
|
|
|
$ docker run -d --restart=always -p 0.0.0.0:8000:8000 lisk/mainnet a65b03c0a6725411c21bbff8b2da922dbebfd206bcf1130722c7dd305ade2a2f docker: Error response from daemon: driver failed programming external connectivity on endpoint hungry_albattani (29e877ff92a965ddabe2d21d10cabf64cd026512f616acdeafd2155420c6aa96): Bind for 0.0.0.0:8000 failed: port is already allocated. How to fix this error: do I have to purchase a docker vps? |
|
|
|
If the case good for them  Yea, but who is 'them'? Seems as if no devs are stepping up to lead updates and outline a vision. As Klee says, no mans land! |
|
|
|
|
Wow, quiet in here for weeks. Looks like floor is around 12-13. Any future outlook for Qora? Who's the current lead dev?
|
|
|
|
I will never change when it comes to being brutally honest, it's just who I am and will always be.
I respect this David, thanks. IOTA is a developing startup business and requires a thick skin in your position. Some people are just too sensitive and need niceties. As the cliche goes, it can be lonely in the driver's seat (or something along those lines). Keep up the good work. |
|
|
|
|
Seems as though things are a bit hollow after the 60+ sat run. Devs leaving and now little goings on. Being patient.
|
|
|
|
I'll just add a couple of other ideas that I've been thinking about (as the idea of multiple blockchains that all use AT is one that I have held for a long time as well).
One blockchain could become a replacement "ticketing" system for events (and maybe even things like booking transportation).
Another blockchain would be to represent small groups of individuals and support voting (optionally transparent) where one vote represents an individual.
Both good ideas - especially 1 vote = 1 individual as all voting implementations I've seen are weighted based on stake (maybe I've missed other voting options out there). PS - sad to see Vrontis leave qora but happy to see emancipator sticking aroung  |
|
|
|
Good on you guys to do this. Thanks. |
|
|
|
yes, 2 out of 3 multisig from Coinbase.
I'll update the ann soon.
Thank you Sasha |
|
|
|
Last I checked up on SuperNET, the MGW has a history of being very squeaky and has to be "force fed" every few days when requests get stuck server-side. Have you guys improved the current implementation of MGW for launch? If so, what have you done to improve the current problems? How many servers will be used initially for the MGW?
Thanks.
I think you are asking in wrong thread vanbreuk (sprnt) BOT [9:00 PM] [9:01] Multigateway (or an equivalent development over Waves) would require coding work to be adapted for Waves, it's not a matter of server configuration only since the Nxt API is deeply ingrained in it. But of course a Waves MGW is an interesting idea to consider. Well the OP mentioned that the MGW idea would be used. I guess this means a new codebase for the MGW will be coded from scratch for waves? Two options - MGW can be configured/modified for Waves what would enable influx of other cryptos into system or equivalent development will follow Thanks mxxxxxx. One final Q: will Coinbase be okay to send BTC for ICO or will a signable wallet be required? |
|
|
|
Last I checked up on SuperNET, the MGW has a history of being very squeaky and has to be "force fed" every few days when requests get stuck server-side. Have you guys improved the current implementation of MGW for launch? If so, what have you done to improve the current problems? How many servers will be used initially for the MGW?
Thanks.
MGW is working fine actually now we have on our team the admin who supports it at the moment actually the software is not so complicated, we'll make it work perfectly. nothing is perfect. But an improvement over MGW would suffice, I guess. |
|
|
|
Last I checked up on SuperNET, the MGW has a history of being very squeaky and has to be "force fed" every few days when requests get stuck server-side. Have you guys improved the current implementation of MGW for launch? If so, what have you done to improve the current problems? How many servers will be used initially for the MGW?
Thanks.
I think you are asking in wrong thread vanbreuk (sprnt) BOT [9:00 PM] [9:01] Multigateway (or an equivalent development over Waves) would require coding work to be adapted for Waves, it's not a matter of server configuration only since the Nxt API is deeply ingrained in it. But of course a Waves MGW is an interesting idea to consider. Well the OP mentioned that the MGW idea would be used. I guess this means a new codebase for the MGW will be coded from scratch for waves? |
|
|
|
I read the entire OP and saw nothing about escrow.
Please tell me that all BTC invested during the ICO will be escrowed and if something goes off kilter during the ICO, will BTC will be returned?
Yes, crowdfunding funds will be escrowed, 3 great partners, will be announced soon. Great, thanks! One more question: will I be able to send ICO BTC from a non-signable wallet (i.e. Coinbase) or will blockchain.io be preferable? |
|
|
|
|
Last I checked up on SuperNET, the MGW has a history of being very squeaky and has to be "force fed" every few days when requests get stuck server-side. Have you guys improved the current implementation of MGW for launch? If so, what have you done to improve the current problems? How many servers will be used initially for the MGW?
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
