Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 04:54:43 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 ... 93 »
121  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: TPTB_need_war Bitcoin Fork in the making! on: May 18, 2016, 11:48:58 AM
Quote
You succeeded in hoodwinking AnonyMint and destroying his reputation by convincing him that he would be on the successful side by speaking out against ICOs, premines, etc.. So that the former reputation that AnonyMint had became unusable when it was time to use it.

When I read this, that HONCHO says smooth has destroyed AnonyMint's reputation by hoodwinking (WTF) I understood that unfortunately HONCHO is a TPTB_need_war sockpuppet. Only the emotional and often  impulsive and sometimes hysterical TPTB_need_war says such melancholy nonsense which in the same time aggressive as well. God bless him, as I said we like him for many reasons, and I genuinely wish he be OK.

I told TPTB_need_war please start working with real people in real world crypto projects. I said to him, you need to be in a project and interacting with developers to unleash your potential instead of arguing in this forum. He said, no no, I want to work with the smartest, i.e. a person who is smarter than he is. Fair enough, but since fucking Einstein is dead, searching for the smartest than TPTB_need_war is an uphill task. So instead of working with anybody, he is go around in this forum by telling that he is the smartest. A bit bizarre as hmachado and others pointed out, but again, I wish I could help him to sort out his problems.

One thing is sure, if I am wrong and HONCHO is not TPTB_need_war sockpuppet, which I doubt very much, but lets assume the unlikely that HONCHO is not TPTB_need_war, then the issue is bigger. This HONCHO nick act even weirder than TPTB_need_war does so don't expect anything more than a drama from the HONCHO-TPTB_need_war partnership.

122  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: TPTB_need_war Bitcoin Fork in the making! on: May 18, 2016, 03:23:51 AM
except to try to attack us with the appeal to hypocrisy fallacy.

The hypocrisy of claiming Monero is not a coordinated entity from one side of your mouth, then defending your tribe "us" out of the other side of your mouth.

You may even believe that the two sides of your mouth are two people, so that they are not inconsistent.

You succeeded in hoodwinking AnonyMint and destroying his reputation by convincing him that he would be on the successful side by speaking out against ICOs, premines, etc.. So that the former reputation that AnonyMint had became unusable when it was time to use it.

You've laid so much waste in your wake. And potentially destroyed the one person who could have actually fixed crypto for all of us.

I hope you are proud of your result.

But I wouldn't be too smug. AnonyMint is one clever mofo. I am sure he will no longer use words.

In fact, I know his next plan. And he will turn the definition of mining inside-out and upside-down. And you will bow at his feet. Keep your television tuned. The fireworks haven't yet begun.

TPTB_need_war, please stop this comedy, as it is transforming into a tragicomedy.

By now everyone who ever spoke to the TPTB_need_war account understand that the HONCHO account is a TPTB_need_war sockpuppet. Fine. You tried to come back this way, but it is getting creepy as you try to speak for the TPTB_need_war account like "AnonyMint is one clever mofo" and "Holier than thou, as AnonyMint would write" and "fathom the possibility that AnonyMint is so clever he found a paradigm" and "AnonyMint is more ideologically driven" and so on. Nobody on earth speak about TPTB_need_war like this ... except TPTB_need_war himself.

Take my word, stop this please,  it is getting weird. We respect your intellect in many ways, don't destroy your remaining own reputation like this.

123  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: TPTB_need_war Bitcoin Fork in the making! on: May 17, 2016, 10:34:32 PM
What the fuck are you talking about man? Simple question: following the long months of crusade against ICOs, suddenly who is trying to collect money behalf of TPTB_need_war ... for an ICO?

Who is trying to collect with an ICO? AnonyMint? Myself?

Any proof?

Where is the ICO listed for sale?

It seems every accusation you have made in this thread has been shown to be in error.

I am a very old man even older than AnonyMint, and yet it seems you are suffering the frustrated, ranting old man syndrome. May I suggest you take a walk outside and get from fresh air.

Could you clarify for myself and the readers how the proposed "acoin" could be an ICO for AnonyMint's JAMBOX, given that AnonyMint confirmed that all of JAMBOX's crypto-currency will be distributed by unprofitable proof-of-work to the social networking users of JAMBOX?

Did you even read AnonyMint's explanation.

Yes, I did. And that's why I was asking what is the business model for JAMBOX. And then he disappeared and you appeared to collect money. Now I understand. It seems the JAMBOX business model hasn't changed, but there will be a new, different coin than JAMBOX via an ICO. Is that's what happening?

AnonyMint didn't disappear. He was banned. Again you seem to get all the facts wrong and fling accusations before resolving your misconceptions.

There is discussion, no decision.

AnonyMint didn't even start this discussion. He was dragged into it by someone else plastering the forum with this thread.


OK. I am sorry to say, but I have to conclude that HONCHO is the sockpuppet of TPTB_need_war. Nobody would act like this - except TPTB_need_war. I am really sorry, because I always liked TPTB_need_war, he is a good man. It is unfortunate that he ended up like this. He must be in desperate need for money. It's sad really.
124  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: TPTB_need_war Bitcoin Fork in the making! on: May 17, 2016, 10:17:59 PM

Could you clarify for myself and the readers how the proposed "acoin" could be an ICO for AnonyMint's JAMBOX, given that AnonyMint confirmed that all of JAMBOX's crypto-currency will be distributed by unprofitable proof-of-work to the social networking users of JAMBOX?

Did you even read AnonyMint's explanation.

Yes, I did. And that's why I was asking what is the business model for JAMBOX. And then he disappeared and you appeared to collect money. Now I understand. It seems the JAMBOX business model hasn't changed, but there will be a new, different coin than JAMBOX via an ICO. Is that's what happening?

125  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: TPTB_need_war Bitcoin Fork in the making! on: May 17, 2016, 10:12:06 PM

By what specific statute or legal authority do you claim the power to compel me to comply with your information demand?


The power? How about the power came from His Majesty Tupou VI the King of Tonga?

What the fuck are you talking about man? Simple question: following the long months of crusade against ICOs, suddenly who is trying to collect money behalf of TPTB_need_war ... for an ICO?
126  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: TPTB_need_war Bitcoin Fork in the making! on: May 17, 2016, 10:07:59 PM
Jl777, to Waves, is indeed ...

Indeed ... next time do your research before talk to me and now fuck off you WAVES shill to cheerlead your WAVES nonsense for the idiots who buy into the NXT/Waves scam.
127  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: TPTB_need_war Bitcoin Fork in the making! on: May 17, 2016, 09:47:00 PM
How old are you?

I am 18 and masturbating 4 times a day. I also fucked yesterday my neighbour, she is 82 but still pretty. I also had sex with her husband (86 and pretty too). Now, as we answered the very important question of my age and established all relevant facts about my personal life, who the fuck are you?

At least we knew for example the IOTA scammers are David and Sergey so the law enforcements know it as well. Similarly it is important to know who are you?

128  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: TPTB_need_war Bitcoin Fork in the making! on: May 17, 2016, 09:22:09 PM

An escrowed bet of 10 BTC will be sufficient

Now you act like CfB from the IOTA scam. If you ask that man what time is it now or in fact ask any questions such as does a bear shit in the woods or anything really which has a question mark, CfB will offer you a 50 BTC bet to deal with the question ... since he knows nobody gives a monkey about the betting offer of a scammer.

Isn't the interest of your investors to know who the fuck you are? Why you need to complicate the simple question of who you are with a fucking 10 BTC bet? The TPTB_need_war ICO starts as he finished here: fishy and messy.

129  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: TPTB_need_war Bitcoin Fork in the making! on: May 17, 2016, 09:12:01 PM
I am just disapointed that its going to be an IPO... thought it would be different this time.....

After all the hate talk of IPO's that TPTHwar has released I guess he will finally become as culpable as the rest.

 Not that i see much wrong in him needing investment money, but he has been holding us all accountable to a higher standard that he now is willing to overlook.

Remind me to come take a look 1 year after its released.

I would not be concerned about TPTB_need_war outsourcing his ICO/IPO to avoid legal and / or moral liability. I would be concerned about FinCEN launching a wave of enforcement and its impact on the alt-coin market given that IPO/ICO is a favorite way of raising investment money in the alt-coin market, Here is an article on the subject by Arnold & Porter LLP  http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4dea5c6a-110a-4949-a5dd-a82c034210b1

The article refers to the FinCEN guidance I quoted above in this thread and some further guidance from FinCEN. I find the
Quote
Analysis of Past FinCEN Enforcement Waves
section particularly relevant to alt-coin speculators and investors. This is the elephant in the room that very few people in the alt-coin market are willing to talk about for obvious reasons.

These are very valid points.

Just like the post you have replied is valid as well. It is hard to understand that TPTB_need_war has been the most vocal cyber-warrior against ICOs on this forum, and then suddenly he realize, whoops, forget about it ... now really I need to make an ICO too. Welcome to the messy Operation of TPTB_need_war.
130  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: TPTB_need_war Bitcoin Fork in the making! on: May 17, 2016, 05:04:34 PM
Are you jl777 James the chief wanker-scammer of supernet who roll out one money party after another, the latest is the fucking WAVES scam? If yes, don't bother to reply my question.


Lol. Jl777 has absolutely nothing directly to do with Waves



You don't know what jl777 James does directly with what so don't talk nonsense.

Anyway, it seems HONCHO is a TPTB_need_war sockpuppet account. God bless TPTB_need_war, he always navigates himself into these messy situations. Since he has been telling everyone for long months that he is not going to do an ICO, he needed to create a sockpuppet to roll an ICO out.
131  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: TPTB_need_war Bitcoin Fork in the making! on: May 17, 2016, 04:19:47 PM

TPTB_need_war has been telling everyone for long months there won't be any ICO. He said the business model to distribute the coin to the users of JAMBOX without an ICO. You are talking about an ICO. Which one is the case?

Are you jl777 James the chief wanker-scammer of supernet who roll out one money party after another, the latest is the fucking WAVES scam? If yes, don't bother to reply my question.
132  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: TPTB_need_war Bitcoin Fork in the making! on: May 17, 2016, 04:15:58 PM
to drive investment in the proposed ICO.

will your ICO be legal in the United States of America and the Philippines?

Probably not and that's why anonymint has created honcho.

LoL could be the case.
133  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: TPTB_need_war Bitcoin Fork in the making! on: May 17, 2016, 12:25:35 PM
Project delayed? Who would have thought.

LoL the only rational assumption with regards to the project could have been that it will be delayed. I like TPTB_need_war god bless him, he is a good man, but he is unable to make progress. He will also tell me that he can't give away  his JAMBOX business model here, in the public ... which he gave away several times already on this forum.

What was his jump to this anonymous thing anyway? That has been his USP and he has been arguing here for months that the anonymous feature is a big NO-NO, and then he suddenly switch to the anonymous topic. I hope he will sort out his focus and priorities.
134  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: May 17, 2016, 11:48:21 AM
govvy-worshipping, ass-licking.


Oh dear ... again, no wonder that after 7 years endless media hype, hundreds of millions VC investment why BTC could attract less users than a mediocre porn site has.

If delusional arrogant wankers like this one support a project then a project don't need any enemies.
135  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: TPTB_need_war Bitcoin Fork in the making! on: May 17, 2016, 11:34:42 AM

I am in the midst of designing, then go launch JAMBOX, then after that launch a CC distributed to the users of JAMBOX who I was hoping would number in the 100,000 minimum or quickly rising to a million+. I have a detailed plan on that, and I have not abandoned it.


Sounds interesting. Could you explain at least on high level what is this plan? You have mentioned severals times you have this business model of distributing the coins to users for free of charge. What's your thought process and plans with regards to that one? It seems you expect your platform attract lots of users and then they start using the coin to pay for the music content, which is all right, but what exactly will create value for the coin? Will be the coin traded on exchange to create some value for it? The music content providers of JAMBOX who receive payment in your coin will have to dump the income and convert it to FIAT, but who is going to buy it from them?   
136  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: May 16, 2016, 02:38:24 PM
Quote
They might come up with such design, but that won't change the attitude of governments. Armstrong is correct, history indicates the elite is mad when the money is gone and there is no other source but need to collect it from the society. They will make the anonymous BTC an illegal instrument and will enforce the law on operation system or even hardware level. 95% of the users use commercial OS, and therefore it will be a piece of cake for the government to ban all anonym cryptos when the time is right.

You're dreaming, and it's actually a particularly dystopian nightmare too.

There is no technical way these unnamed, shady, all-powerful 'elites' can achieve what you claim. You must not understand how computers or networks work to make such grandiose, rubbish claims about the omnipotence of government. Or it is really is your dream, in which case, fuck right off.

It seems you are certainly not the sharpest knife in the kitchen, most likely you are a delusional one as well. Therefore no wonder you don't understand the environment in which Bitcoin operates nor you understand that governments can stop Bitcoin in many ways. These are including but not limited to legislations, ecosystem, hardware and application.

The easiest from government standpoint and the most obvious is legislation. Money laundering legislations - yes, that's how the crocks of Wall Street and IMF will play the game by presenting the dick to your delusional and arrogant ass via money laundering legislations - will ban a non compliant Bitcoin, and then 99% of individuals and businesses simply won't touch the thing. That's is the compliance level with financial regulations worldwide and therefore no reason to assume BTC will be any different. All countries on earth, including fucking Vanuatu and Cayman Islands will have to subscribe to the policies of the crocks of Wall Street and IMF.

I doubt it will be necessary at all because the legislation will be more than enough to keep the money away from BTC, but governments can also enforce the control on ecosystem level by pushing a new fork to the miners. Bitcoin is fucked on ecosystem level as the greedy, servant minded Chinese miners (and in fact any miner) will comply with laws and regulations. Yes, Bitcoin will exists, albeit it will be a money laundering legislation compliant type one.

The government can and most likely will act on operation system level. Since 95% of users use proprietary OS a non compliant BTC application will be excluded from all these users' computers.

Hardware. I doubt you know anything about hardware/firmware programming. I started that well before the average 28 years old demographics of this forum was born, and here is a news for you: there are discussions already that for "law enforcement" reasons ARM TrustZone and of course Intel architecture must implement interfaces, so "security measures" can be implemented by device manufacturers. What does that means? Even Linux (which obviously won't be the subject of the OS level measures) is fucked as no PPKI signing nor any other cryptography operations will be able to avoid this gate.

I am not a native English speaker, still, if you don't understand what I am saying, then instead of me, you need to fuck off from a rational conversation. On the other hand, your arrogant and delusional attitude explains very well that after 7 years endless media hype, hundreds of millions VC investment why BTC has less users than a mediocre porn site could attract.

137  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Why would anyone buy this DAO crap? on: May 15, 2016, 10:10:42 PM
it is here to stay, and yes it is real.

Idiot. Only the legal issues of a DAO are real and here to stay.
138  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: May 15, 2016, 09:47:44 PM
Armstrong is very much spot on with regards to Bitcoin.

There is no future for the Bitcoin concept to which we all subscribed. There will be some Bitcoin, but the global elite will enforce money confiscation and traceability measures on the network. Not that tax and law enforcement authorities need to deploy their brightest agents to trace transactions on the network which by definition stores all transactions in a public blockchain. Still traceability, compliance with money laundering laws will be introduced by new legislations to send a clear message to the libertarian crowd. Governments will strike and change Bitcoin at the moment when the network start to threaten the status quo. Currently a mediocre fucking social network has far more users than Bitcoin has, Bitcoin is a non-factor in the context of global economy, and there is no reason for governments to intervene yet.
Armstrong is correct, there is nothing to do when the elite wants to retain its control over money and society. The servant minded, corrupt and greedy Chinese miners will adopt any forks and any measures of the Troika (EC, ECB, IMF).

Maybe by then btc core devs will implement measures for anon txs

They might come up with such design, but that won't change the attitude of governments. Armstrong is correct, history indicates the elite is mad when the money is gone and there is no other source but need to collect it from the society. They will make the anonymous BTC an illegal instrument and will enforce the law on operation system or even hardware level. 95% of the users use commercial OS, and therefore it will be a piece of cake for the government to ban all anonym cryptos when the time is right.
139  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Why would anyone buy this DAO crap? on: May 15, 2016, 09:39:22 PM
The decentralized autonomous company has already been explored with things like Bitshares.  Frankly, it kinda sucks.  You have people providing decentralized funding, then the workers that take it have no real incentive or liability to perform unless the worker is already a huge shareholder...but that kind of extremely narrows down your field of workers doesn't it?  You could issue legal contracts with the workers and sue them if they don't perform, but who is the figurehead of the DAO that handles all these things and appears in court?  The DAO converges to centralization resembling a normal, publicly traded company because business is only efficient in a strict, hierarchical, top-down function.

So what exactly do you accomplish out of all this?  If the DAO doesn't collapse on the way to it's evolution in becoming top-down controlled, your only real benefit is the ability to bypass the legal framework and issue a publicly traded stock from your basement (which will probably get people arrested somehow).  So the pros are slightly less legal bureaucracy (only in the short term), with the cons of having nobody at the helm of the company who actually has any idea what they're doing with a valid business plan (you know, the actual important part of a business).

That is the main issue with DAO. A graduate level lawyer would be able to explain to the idiots why this is an unsolvable issue with DAO. (Not that the idiots who "invest" in this nonsense would care at all as they couldn't care less about DAO - they are involved to realize the "ROI").

http://www.coindesk.com/how-to-sue-a-decentralized-autonomous-organization/

"Second, for a DAO to operate in a world in which legal relationships are formalized by contracts, and enforced by courts, I don't see how a DAO can act unless it is either a corporation or it has no corporate form and it is simply an extension of its human members."

and this is the most interesting bit

"Among other things, the members of a general partnership can end up jointly and severally liable on a personal basis for partnership obligations. One potential flaw in their structure is that they may not have assets from which to indemnify third parties.".

However the DAO operators try to twist the facts around the legal responsibility issue, the court will enforce its orders and rulings on the human operators of the network. Would Vitalik get as far as operating a DAO? I doubt he will. It is nothing else but selling a useless, fraudulent fucking cryptoasset.
140  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: May 15, 2016, 05:00:40 PM
Armstrong is very much spot on with regards to Bitcoin.

There is no future for the Bitcoin concept to which we all subscribed. There will be some Bitcoin, but the global elite will enforce money confiscation and traceability measures on the network. Not that tax and law enforcement authorities need to deploy their brightest agents to trace transactions on the network which by definition stores all transactions in a public blockchain. Still traceability, compliance with money laundering laws will be introduced by new legislations to send a clear message to the libertarian crowd. Governments will strike and change Bitcoin at the moment when the network start to threaten the status quo. Currently a mediocre fucking social network has far more users than Bitcoin has, Bitcoin is a non-factor in the context of global economy, and there is no reason for governments to intervene yet.
Armstrong is correct, there is nothing to do when the elite wants to retain its control over money and society. The servant minded, corrupt and greedy Chinese miners will adopt any forks and any measures of the Troika (EC, ECB, IMF).
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 ... 93 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!