Bitcoin Forum
May 12, 2024, 05:45:59 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 [30] 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 ... 93 »
581  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [GDGC] GadgetCoin | Smart Contracts on Hardware | IoT | M2M on: October 08, 2015, 12:13:25 PM

The very slow progress is annoying


Thanks for the update! It's good to see the project is moving forward, but yes, the slow progress is annoying. I really don't want to harass you about the progress, but trying to push and deliver sooner than later is critical. I understand this team and project has been very methodical, not rushing and trying to bring completely new things to the market from the beginning, still delivery in timely manner is important. So far you are lucky because the progress of other IoT and crypto projects, never mind IBM is even slower, so you are still in a primary position. It would be great if we could utilize on the failures of others. I think, the very bad shape of crypto currencies provide this project with a unique opportunity to succeed, but it could only happen if the platform start processing IoT transactions. I know you are working and the technology is close to the breakthrough, but as with any technology projects this final phase is critical, and keep pushing is very important.


There isn't a need to rush. Have you ever developed something? When you get in a rush it isn't sustainable, and eventually your work will suffer. I get that you are impatient, but tell me how many other IoT hopefuls are working with W3C? Who is tailing Gadgetnet right now? You are wanting 'crypto scam dev' speed in the real world. I will happily buy your coins if you can't wait.

It's quite unfortunate that my post indicated that I am having any doubts about this project. It's really not the case - quite the opposite. I understand the developers how good software engineers are, they are honest guys with integrity and vision to provide solution for the booming IoT field, and I have no doubt something really promising is being developing here. Since I fully subscribed to the plan of charging the users $10/GadgetCoin as well as I believe the business plan is clearly doable, I can see the potential of W3C, I am looking for a 3,000% ROI with GadgetCooin/GadgetNet as the minimum target, and therefore I am certainly not selling GadgetCoin at this stage.

You are absolutely right terms of the scam devs vs. this project. These guys - with the skills they have - could easily roll out a BTC or LTC fork, make an IPO and then collect the money, rinse and repeat several times like many other devs have been doing that process for a while. Instead of the GDC devs have been spending their own money, free time at nights and weekends to create a solution from scratch by taking the risk which involve with such a new software development. When all those many hundreds BTC & LTC clone coins will be gone, then GadgetCoin/GadgetNet will be one of the few that remain to be exist. (In order to make that happen, the team needs to be consistent in delivery, which I am sure they will be, I just was reminding them about the importance of timely delivery).

As for have I developed something, actually yes, quite a few software in the last 20-25 years, you can imagine how many software a person could develop during such time frame. I could be wrong, but the most important what I have learned is that we always need to push as hard as we can in order to succeed in this industry. And yes, you are absolutely correct that we need to be patient and understand that the devs work part time at this stage.

I am very happy to be one of the supporters of this project. Very small community, but very good people like yourself, zsp, tobeaj2mer0, albert_mt, Netzer and all other supporters, it's a great community and as we are just at the beginning it will be even better.

All together, I am really positive about the Devs and GadgetCoin.


582  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic Totalitarianism on: October 08, 2015, 11:46:05 AM

Sometimes bad things happen to good people, and certainly that's the case with regards to your situation.

I really hope your health issues will be resolved, and I believe it will be. This community need your knowledge and intellect, I hope it gives you strength in solving out the health problems.

Take care and speak soon.
583  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [VRC] | VeriCoin | POS-NSDI | VeriBit | VeriSend | VeriSMS | SuperNET Core on: October 07, 2015, 10:57:29 AM
Any news from the old, good Vericoin project? What about Supernet and the rest of plans?


I'm wondering this too this shocking 2nd attempt was awful I felt the original vericoin had some promising features and philosophy

I am not sure what was that 2nd attempt, last time I heard from them it was the PoS which of course means absolutely nothing, but at least it was an attempt in innovation and well done for that.

I think Vericoin still have an opportunity to be the next crypto that could be attractive for the general public (but of course the time is running out quickly). Bitshare realized this opportunity with Identabit. Now a well known crypto developer Dan Larimer of Bitshare basically implements what we have suggested to Vericoin a year ago: use the personal profile of the DEVs to create a currency that complies with laws and regulations. We said, fuck the dark net, fuck anonymity, in order to reach out to the public (which was the original theme of Vericoin) the digital currency will have to comply with regulations, therefore must have a public face for the coin - which Vericoin is having from the beginning. For some unknown reason the devs don't do this, however here and there I can hear that basically this will be the end goal. Vericion still in the position to reach out to the public using the profile of the DEVs as the public face of the operation, but of course it is more difficult than it was a year ago

I don't blame the DEVs for not pushing harder. The whole digital currency movement is in serious trouble. The DEVs don't have income from this (though probably Patrick Nosker and a few others around the project had pocketed a lot) so of course they get on with their carrier instead of working on a digital currency.

We are still working on significant things more details will come in 2.0 whitepaper.  This release will be biggest innovation since the release of VeriCoin itself.  We opted not to go down the identity road for one primary reason.  If you require identity, you also must require a permissioned system, if you require a permissioned system you re-enter the security cat and mouse game and lose all the efficiencies of pseudonymous public systems.  We will be addressing identity in a pseudonymous way but not true identity.  The permissioned systems will be the way the banks handle the blockchain initially, however they will quickly realize beyond backend efficiencies they cannot compete with the efficiencies of pseudonymous permissionless systems.  At this point the banking industry will be disrupted, but likely not until the smaller more adventurous banks utilize this public permissionless system without having to fire most of their employees and they end up out-competing the traditional banking system.  However this all will take some time.  We will be building on the public, permissionless system and will have significant infrastrucutre in place when this disruption takes place.

Thanks for the update. I think there are still users, potentially investors out there who are interested in Vericoin and see potential in the team, so it is great to hear some updates sometimes from you.

Terms of the identity and protocol matters, we are having lots of discussion about these issues in the economy and other threads of this forum. Could you explain please briefly what are the permissioned system and pseudonymous public system in this context? Of course you can explain in more details if you have time - I am sure it would be appreciated by many -, but even a brief explanation would be very useful to understand what are the main attributes of a public permissionless system. Even in bullet points would be great to get some info to understand the basic idea and what are you up to.
584  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [GDGC] GadgetCoin | Smart Contracts on Hardware | IoT | M2M on: October 07, 2015, 10:40:39 AM

The very slow progress is annoying


Thanks for the update! It's good to see the project is moving forward, but yes, the slow progress is annoying. I really don't want to harass you about the progress, but trying to push and deliver sooner than later is critical. I understand this team and project has been very methodical, not rushing and trying to bring completely new things to the market from the beginning, still delivery in timely manner is important. So far you are lucky because the progress of other IoT and crypto projects, never mind IBM is even slower, so you are still in a primary position. It would be great if we could utilize on the failures of others. I think, the very bad shape of crypto currencies provide this project with a unique opportunity to succeed, but it could only happen if the platform start processing IoT transactions. I know you are working and the technology is close to the breakthrough, but as with any technology projects this final phase is critical, and keep pushing is very important.
585  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic Totalitarianism on: October 07, 2015, 10:16:08 AM

In my particular case, if my health isn't fixed in a matter of weeks, I am royally fucked. (continuing antibiotics. The diarrhea stopped last night after 3 doses of 500 mg of Metranidozole, and I ate noodles and drank Gatorade. Withholding more comments until I have more results if any from taking doxycycline. I am not being religious about this, I was focused on diet, but if the miracle of modern medicine's antibiotics is what I need, then so be it. I speculate I am too unhealthy due to some unknown reason or pathogen to handle the raw milk. It seems just about anything can send my gut into disarray. Maybe diet has nothing to do with my problem.)

I hope you can fix the problem, and I am sorry if I said anything offending or not appropriate in our conversation about diet a few days ago. 
586  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic Totalitarianism on: October 04, 2015, 10:25:24 PM

I admitted that vegan diet probably has benefits and even that for heart disease might be critical.

I think you are absolutely correct about that.

I just have to tell you frankly, because I tried to be nice but then I was being called dumb.

I think you are too sensitive and you can't handle when someone has a different opinion than yours. You are calling people retard, dumb, etc. and insulting people with all kind of uncivil remarks in this forum all the time. Your posts are full of uncivil personal insults - in the meantime you are so sensitive to any opinion which disagree with you. Which is more important, I certainly not called you dumb, not even implied that - quite the opposite, I made a compliment virtually in every second post that you are the smartest person on this forum. You became very upset, because I was dare to express my opinion about the benefits of plant based diet, and that I subscribed to the calcium deficit theory with regards to milk.

No you told me that raw milk was very bad

I wrote above, that I am talking about supermarket diary products that is accessible to 99.999% of population, which raw milk is not such widely available product. I have no specific opinion on raw milk (except that logic dictates that it must be a bit better than pasteurized milk, in the meantime according to many scientists the bacteria in raw milk is a risk). I was talking generally about diary products and the government propaganda of diary products.
Milk is a separate food group on the food chart and that info is pushed to billions of people as a guideline for nutritions. That's what government teaches in school and even in kindergarten. It is a separate food group because it has calcium and some protein. It is same as the pumpkin seed would be a separate food group just because it is rich in magnesium.
Since large corporations - that control the FDA and European food authorities - have a vast interest in diary products, the propaganda pushes diary products to the masses. Even you admitted that the industrial diary products are not so good. I said several times that I am not worried about raw milk, I am talking about diary products which is accessible by 99.999% of the population, so I am not sure why so upset about that raw milk topic.

No hard feeling from my part as well, it was a very good discussion and I leave it with this.
587  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic Totalitarianism on: October 04, 2015, 01:55:59 PM
... raw, grass-fed goat's (A1 casein) milk, when you have apparently been too lazy to search for counter arguments to the acid hypothesis you promulgated.

I'm not trying to split hairs, but you've made the same error a few times now. A1 beta-casein is the bad stuff. The healthy protein from goat's milk is A2.

-----------------------------------------------

altcoinUK, please be careful what conclusions you draw from the work of T. Colin Campbell in The China Study. It's been so heavily debunked that it's considered by many respected experts to be junk science.

Wanna see the real science? This is what happens when you compare Campbell's claims against his own data:
http://rawfoodsos.com/2010/07/07/the-china-study-fact-or-fallac/
Sorry, but that's some pretty damning material.

And just for fun, here's a debate between T. Colin Campbell and Loren Cordain on human protein requirements. Notice that Cordain's arguments contain over 150 citations to research studies, while Campbell's argument contains no citations at all:
http://www.catalystathletics.com/articles/downloads/proteinDebate.pdf

TL;DR T. Colin Campbell's The China Study is evidence of nothing but fraud.

Thanks for the link, it is very interesting. Please note, I have never stated the plant based diet lowers the chance of cancer. I am aware of that most studies point out that plant based diet has no statistically measurable effect on cancer.  As for the cardiovascular section, I think there is a hypothesis was thrown at Campbell's hypothesis. Since hypothesis vs hypothesis, I can't see anything else than intellectual back and forth (some calls it who is the biggest dick competition) between two scientists.

I wouldn't like to get into the debate whether Campbell's study is a junk science or not. Firstly I am not a scientist, long time ago, at the time they called like that, I was trained to be a computer programmer, so I am not qualified to make the judgement whether a study is junk science or not. Researches and studies funded by large pharmaceuticals will naturally conclude that Campbell's study is a junk science. After all Campbell is a serious threat to a $100 billion revenue stream (I understand the link you quoted is not funded by those crocs). It was no study in the history of science when another scientist wouldn't like to disproof the theory by most of times asserting a new hypothesis, so when from 10 scientists 5 support Campbell's view, another 5 says it is a junk science then I see that as a usual back and forth between scientists.

For me the most important is, that based on the theme and educational work of Campbell the cure of heart diseases and diabetes is starting to take a new path. Not to mention, it saved me a major heart surgery and saved the life by reversing the condition for almost all heart disease and diabetes patients who have undertaken the plant based i.e. not processed food based diet. One thing is sure: when you are on a plant based diet, eating lots of vegetable, fruit and not consuming processed food then your processed sugar intake is zero, your trans fat, hydrogenated oils, corn syrup intake is zero as well. No wonder the condition of heart diseases and diabetes patients is dramatically reversed once they get on plant based diet.

I am hoping this conversation will help a few young men of this thread when they are getting older, and then their doctors will tell that your cholesterol is getting high or it seems you are having diabetes issues. Or when someone from their family is having such issues. (since heart disease and diabetes are the biggest killer there is a good chance either the young men of this thread or their family members will experience with those diseases). And then I hope they will remember at the time - when the diseases are not critical yet - they have the option to go to a 3 months plant based diet (first just try it and see if it is doable). And then, they will see how the indicators of  life dangerous high cholesterol and diabetes will be lowered.
588  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic Totalitarianism on: October 04, 2015, 01:44:20 PM

And you tried to tell me that raw milk is bad and in fact it appears to perhaps be the cure!

Aren't you the least bit shamed for potentially giving me disinformation that could have prevented me from being cured if I had listened to you!

That's a great news you are cured.
I am not sure what serious, terminal illness you have that drinking raw milk for 3 days could cure you, but since I am not doctor, better if I not speculate on that. For the very same reason, that I am not Prof. Dr. AltcoinUK PhD BMed but a random fucker I am not ashamed that I shared my opinion on an Internet forum. I assumed from the beginning that with your intellect you will make the decision on your own with regards to the solution to your problem, but please believe me that I shared my opinion with the best intention.



So don't delude yourself that everyone else who has gut dysbiosys will be cured only with 100% vegan diet. At times, I was eating all vegetables before over the past 3 years, but it did not cure me. I tried so many different diets and supplements.


I have just quoting this one sentence of yours because it probably summarizes the source of our misunderstanding. I never stated that plant based diet is a universal solution to everything nor that it will cure gut dysbiosys. I have not stated that, because
   a) I have no idea what gut dysbiosys is
   b) I have been specifically talking about and focusing on heart disease, diabetes, the two biggest health issues for westerners.
   
Yes, beginning of our conversation I suggested that perhaps you could try plant based diet instead of taking the saturated fat rich diary products and meat.  By now, I understand that you have already tried it, in fact you had been eating vegetables for 3 years (which is not equivalent with vegan diet but never mind), such diet didn't help you and now, thanks God, you found out that raw milk is the solution to your problem. I couldn’t be happier if raw milk sort out your Multiple Sclerosis. As I said at the beginning I have nothing but respect to you, and it would be great if you could sort out your health problem so we could read lot longer your posts on economy, society, computer science, etc.

I believe, we are trying to say the same thing. I do that with my bad English and of course you do that with your exceptional intellect and as always with your very educated posts. We are saying that the corrupt political system allows large corporations to poison the population with processed food aka sugar, trans fat, hydrogenated oils, corn syrup and the sockpuppets of large food companies in the FDA assist to that.

Which I have been asserting is that by taking plant based diet, by definition there isn't any sugar intake nor trans fat nor corn syrup nor hydrogenated oils consumption. No wonder heart disease and diabetes is non-existent in cases when the diet is plant based, or the condition could be reversed once the patient undertake plant based diet. If the individual is not a religious vegan and eat low fat fish/seafood (without oil) regularly like I do, then you could get the benefits of low fat protein, Omega 3, etc. which (i.e. the large quantity of vegetables combined with small amount of fish without oil) probably makes Japanese the longest living people. That's all I am saying from the beginning. And again I am very happy you could find the solution for your problem.
589  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic Totalitarianism on: October 03, 2015, 05:00:38 PM

altcoinUK, I hope you don't have a child.

I have a few actually, and all of them are meat eaters :-))) they are adults and love to eat steak and all those nice meats which I loved so much. I asked them, when you will get to your 30s then remember what happened to me and how my heart disease was reveresed (just like many thousands other heart patients had), because I am sure my children are genetically programmed - just like me- to have issues with cholesterol and fat deposit on the artery.

So now we find out you were eating Frankenstein poison (not grass-fed, no hormones, no genetic modified meat) which may explain why you ended up with heart disease.

It is no wonder that Westerners are sick. They don't eat food.

I bet even the vegetables you eat are farmed and not wild.

I suggest to keep this conversation civil. I am having just enough that virtually none of your posts could be without a personal insult about my reading ability, intelligence, etc.  I fully understand one day you are in the league of Kobe Bryant and you are super athlete (who won nothing with this exceptional mentality and ability by the way, so I am not sure WTF are we talking about), other day you can't even get out from bed because you are so ill, but you feel qualified to educate others how to be healthy, but again, lets keep it civil.
 
To get back to the topic, yes, just like 99.999% of normal, average, working persons do, I got my food from supermarkets or restaurants  before my heart disease developed. I think that's what people - apart from Kobe Bryant and the likes - do: go to supermarket or eat in restaurants. According to health statistics heart disease is the biggest killer, so no wonder average people like me get it. And then, I listened to remarkable scientists such as Caldwell Esselstyn and T. Colin Campbell, got myself into their programs and then the heart condition was reversed  - just like many thousands other heart patients who had undertaken the diet had similar result.

I am going though on the pain of discussing this issue with you and listening you personal insults, because statistics indicate that majority of young readers of this thread will be experiencing one way or other with heart disease or diabetes (because yes, they are buying the fucking food from conventional sources such as supermarket) and I hope what I put here can help them before the heart disease develops or even after, when they are having a heart disease and they are in serious trouble, in most of the cases in life dangerous situation.
590  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic Totalitarianism on: October 03, 2015, 04:26:05 PM
Statistic and data clearly indicates that countries with the lowest consumption of dairy products also have the lowest fracture incidence in their population

It is very frustrating to deal with people who have very low reading comprehension.

What did I say? Did those studies measure people who drink raw, grass-fed, A1 casein milk or those who drink some Frankenstein poison that is mislabeled "milk".

Thus you willfully are writing disinformation.

The scientific method doesn't seem to be something you comprehend.

And didn't I answer that I think in this context your raw milk is quite irrelevant as 99.999% of people simply unable to get your raw milk? The messages that milk is good for you has been pushed to people for decades, and all I am saying is, researches indicate that consuming the supermarket milk is not good for your health. Since 99.999% of consumers never can get raw milk why do wee need to debate the raw milk issue.

Terms of the raw milk risks, many scientists point out that the the all kind of bacteria in raw milk actually exposes you to more health risks than benefit. I am not sure if that the case, but I am just mentioning that there are lots of concerns with regards to that.
591  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic Totalitarianism on: October 03, 2015, 04:17:05 PM

altcoinUK, I hope you don't have a child.

I have a few actually, and all of them are meat eaters :-))) they are adults and love to eat steak and all those nice meats which I loved so much. I asked them, when you will get to your 30s then remember what happened to me and how my heart disease was reveresed (just like many thousands other heart patients had), because I am sure my children are genetically programmed - just like me- to have issues with cholesterol and fat deposit on the artery.
592  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic Totalitarianism on: October 03, 2015, 03:53:37 PM
Re-read my post. I cited 5 references that say your acid PH claim is total bullshit nonsense.

Please do proper research before spreading nonsense that will harm the health of readers.

OK.

Statistic and data clearly indicates that countries with the lowest consumption of dairy products also have the lowest fracture incidence in their population, while counties with high diary consumption is on the top of the hip and other fracture statistics. Your quoted research doesn't invalidate that fact, just like the beneficial effects of plant based diet with regards to heart disease and diabetes is a fact.

I would also like you stop spreading nonsense that will harm the health of readers, especially that in one day you can't get out from bed, at other day you are in the league of Kobe Bryant, therefore your cases the 1 in a million odd one while the recovery of heart disease and diabetes patients from plant based diet is exclusively happening to all patients who undertake such diet.

593  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic Totalitarianism on: October 03, 2015, 03:42:05 PM
But let's get back on topic. This week I began experiencing a toothache. Never in my life did I have cavities nor any problem with my teeth. Why? Because I drank milk until my 30s. I have very strong teeth.

Dairy is important for calcium also.

You are probably the smartest person by far here, you obviously know a lot, but this is the second time I have to correct you on a popular misconception about foods (the beneficial effects of olive oil was the first).

Milk actually reduces calcium in your bones. Similarly to all animal proteins, milk acidifies the body pH level, which then triggers a biological correction. Calcium is an excellent acid neutraliser and since the biggest storage of calcium in the body your bones, then the very same calcium in your bones is utilized to neutralize the acidic effect of milk. Once calcium is pulled out of the bones, it leaves the body via the urine, and the net result is an actual calcium deficit. No wonder why statistics indicate that countries with the lowest consumption of dairy products also have the lowest fracture incidence in their population, while Denmark is on the top of the hip and other fracture statistics. A recent Swedish study published not long ago in the British Medical Journal points out that drinking three glasses of milk per day results in increased incidence of osteoporosis, bone fractures, and earlier mortality. These are independent university researches. On the other hand, as far as I know all researches/studies that suggest the benefits of milk (mainly the calcium myth) are funded by the diary industry.

Plant based sources of calcium such as leafy greens, nuts, dried basil are both healthier and more easily absorbed. One cup serving of soybean sprouts provides 46 per cent of daily calcium requirements which is the equivalent of a glass and a half of milk, except the soybean provides you with only 30 calories, which reduced calories intake is obviously better (for the vast majority of population). I fully understand by now that it is not applicable to you as you need an incredible amount of extreme calories for your top athlete regime, but 99.999% of the population is not in the league of Kobe Bryant and yourself, and therefore I think they should know that diary product is not good for human body (which I have been banging-on in the last few pages).

There are a few very good documentaries that summarizes how the diary industry and their sockpuppets in the FDA mislead the population about the benefit of milks.

I am sure you are having strong teeth despite of milk, and not because of milk. Your strong teeth most likely because of your genetics.

This link is interesting.
http://saveourbones.com/osteoporosis-milk-myth/

I am sorry but there is so much bullshit out there on the internet. You can't just cite everything you read as fact because it isn't.

First of all you can't leap to cite any shit about milk, because ostensibly none of the research is being done with raw, grass fed, A1 casein milk. Pasteurized milk isn't milk. Grain fed milk isn't milk. A2 casein GENETICALLY MODIFIED cows don't produce milk. Rather those are Frankenstein foods where all the enzymes and micro-nutrients have been destroyed. I suggest you pasteurize your GENETICALLY MODIFIED vegetables (and add heapings of pesticides and fertilizer to bring them to parity with Frankenstein Holstein cow's shit we drink), then run some studies on how unhealthy vegetables are.

arielbit pointed out up thread this point that cows that were fed the wrong shit couldn't even sustain their own calves.

It amazes me that people can't figure these basic things out and fall for that disinformation as you did. Sigh.

There is no way you can make a sane argument that native diary and native animal meat are unhealthy. That is absolute nonsense for idiots who can't discern between modern Frankenstein poisons that we label as "food" and the actual food that nature has produced for 1000s of years.

If raw milk is so bad, then please explain to me why today on my day after drinking raw milk, I had a miraculous day which is the first day in years where I felt incredibly strong.

I had the most intense sports day today. How can I describe my day? It is unbelievable. Here is 11pm and I am still jumping touching the ceiling. I powered through a barbell workout jumping around between sets and just exploding all over the place. I powered through very heavy weight like it was nothing.

I was running back and forth full speed on the full court basketball at midday tropical heat in the Philippines and not getting tired. I was exploding to rim with a power I thought was gone forever. After exploding to the rim, instead of feeling like I was ready to collapse, I was jumping, growing like a lion, and headed back down the court full speed to fly in the air and bam again two hand finger roll right near the lip of rim. A 50 fucking year old man who just last week could hardly fucking get out of bed.

What did you fucking say about milk  Huh

(you have a confirmation bias and seek anything which can validate your vegan diet as being the best, thus you do not attempt to view the question objectively. It would make no sense at all that what humans have been eating for 1000s of years would be unhealthy for humans. Just a little common sense about the preponderance of time scales would tell you that your nonsense of the current day fad and disinformation is just that.)

P.S. I am back to 70 kg. So I gained 5 kg in roughly a week. And this isn't all fat gain. I am still looking very lean and muscles fibers very visible. This is muscle gain mostly. I really made a big jump in muscle mass from that day of drinking raw milk and eating native chicken and goat. When I woke up this morning, I felt like an ox.

I am fucking saying about milk that 99.9999% of population has no access to your miraculous raw milk and therefore they will get the crap from the supermarket milk. Most importantly, as I pointed out, regardless it is raw milk or pasteurized milk, milk causes calcium deficit. I explained the biological correction which the response of human body to milk - which results in calcium deficit.

I quoted studies and researches - in the meantime you are keep referring to your personal case which is frankly quite exceptional as
a) you are having a potentially terminal illness and apparently some days you feel so bad that you can't even get out from bed
b) terms of your exercise regime at other days you are in the league of Kobe Bryant and other world class top athletes
c) you have the luxury to get your food from the best natural resources of the world

I am sorry, that's not typical, but you suggest that we must make from your experience a general conclusion, one that should be applicable to the masses. It is not possible because your case is not typical. I am talking about typical and normal cases. I have been trying to point out what is relevant to the majority of population, even to the audience of this forum, to young males in their twenties: all of them will experience with heart disease or diabetes or high blood pressure (or both in many cases) due to personally they will have or one of their family members will suffer from that, statistic indicates that will happen. These are diseases that could reversed and cured with plant based and vegan diet, and not eating the crap pushed to supermarket shelves by large corporations: engineered meat, diary products, trans fat, corn syrup (90% of foods have that) and hydrogenated oils, i.e. processed food.

You classify as bullshit the logical conclusions that was derived from large data samples, in most of cases over many years of independent research. In contrast to the biological facts, studies and researches that I have quoted, you argue with your personal experience which include days when you are in the league with Kobe Bryant as well as days when you can't get out from bed.

Anyway, I am happy you feel better, try to keep yourself that way :-))))

EDIT:
I really don't want to validate any vegan diet. Especially that I eat fish and seafood. All I am saying is, researches and reports from patients who are willing to undertake plant based diet indicate that plant based diet  in majority of cases reverses heart disease and diabetes. The exactly same happened to me as well what researches indicate will happen once you get on plant based diet. The majority of population will experience with heart disease and diabetes.
594  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic Totalitarianism on: October 03, 2015, 02:52:31 PM
I also suggest the "Forks Over Knives" documentary, but yeah, the "Food Inc." is probably the most shocking and educational.
595  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic Totalitarianism on: October 03, 2015, 01:19:24 PM

There are a few very good documentaries that summarizes how the diary industry and their sockpuppets in the FDA mislead the population about the benefit of milks.

This link is interesting as well.
http://saveourbones.com/osteoporosis-milk-myth/

Do you happen to know the names of these documentaries off hand altcoinUK? I'm sure many of us would be interested to watch.

"Milk?". I believe I watched this on Netflix. Please watch that, quite shocking.

However, in the context of this Totalitarianism thread the most interesting is "Food, Inc." available on Netflix. It reveals how large food corporation poison the mass population with  and by controlling FDA.

Thanks! I watched Food Inc a few years back. I think a rewatch is in order. But perhaps I'll watch Milk? this evening.

You will see in the Milk? documentary Campbell, the scientist who produced the China Study which I have been quoting in the last few pages. The work of these remarkable scientists slowly but surely is getting to the mainstream media. Still, doctors learn very little about nutrition science during their university studies, which is quite shocking. Majority of the research programmes of those universities are funded by large pharmaceutical companies, no wonder doctors are trained to push the expensive medicines to the masses instead of trying to educate the patients about the source of the problem. After all, cholesterol, heart and diabetes medicines are a +$100 billion dollar business and the health services will pick up the bill (NHS in the UK). This is a gold mine for large pharmaceutical companies. Their comrades, the large food corporations cause the problem in the first place by poisoning the masses with sugar, trans fats and hydrogenated oils. In the meantime, the FDA is full of former executives from large food corporations. A perfect cycle: poisons that require expensive medicines. Doctors are happy, shareholders of large pharmaceutical companies are happy, politicians whom campaign supported by large pharmaceutical companies are happy, what could go wrong with this perfect system except that there are 10th of millions people suffer from completely avoidable heart and diabetes diseases.

My daily rant is over, have a nice day :-))))
596  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic Totalitarianism on: October 03, 2015, 12:50:29 PM

There are a few very good documentaries that summarizes how the diary industry and their sockpuppets in the FDA mislead the population about the benefit of milks.

This link is interesting as well.
http://saveourbones.com/osteoporosis-milk-myth/

Do you happen to know the names of these documentaries off hand altcoinUK? I'm sure many of us would be interested to watch.

"Milk?". I believe I watched this on Netflix. Please watch that, quite shocking.

However, in the context of this Totalitarianism thread the most interesting is "Food, Inc." available on Netflix. It reveals how large food corporation poison the mass population with  and by controlling FDA.
597  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic Totalitarianism on: October 03, 2015, 12:12:42 PM

But what may be difficult for you to grasp because you will not encounter many people like me unless you are around top athletes such as a Kobe Byrant or Lance Armstrong, is that even if I can't put my shoes on, somehow I will dig deep and force myself to go out and run 2 kms even though I feel as though I could collapse and pass out during the extremely arduous endeavor. Your average person wouldn't ever put themselves through such pain. You don't understand that what separates most athletes who play in the NBA from the superstars is not only talent, but more so that attitude that very few people have that they can endure massive amounts of pain and they subject themselves to intense gut wrenching effort to reach their goal.


Actually, I believe, I do understand the mindset of top athletes, but yes, you are correct, I didn't assume that you are in the league of those top athletes.  
A very close friend of mine is an Olympic champion, two times world champion and 6 times European champion and I do understand what mental strength is required to get that result. Knowing his carrier, it is unreal what those top athletes can do to get the result. Apart from Christmas Day (his only day off from training in a year), he trained usually twice a day from age 8 to age 30, but again, the mentality of those athletes what is quite exceptional. It was thrown a lot of unfair problems to him on both personal and professional level (media, agents, sponsors, etc.), but nothing could detour him from training because he had one goal: to be a champion. He avoided any disagreements to be in the position to be able to train next day in order to become a champion. In the meantime, I was very good at football (still play a lot), but I said to my coaches/managers that fuck-off man, that's a bullshit when I didn't like something - no wonder that my carrier was limited to run around with arrogant fuckers like myself in league 4.



But let's get back on topic. This week I began experiencing a toothache. Never in my life did I have cavities nor any problem with my teeth. Why? Because I drank milk until my 30s. I have very strong teeth.

Dairy is important for calcium also.


You are probably the smartest person by far here, you obviously know a lot, but this is the second time I have to correct you on a popular misconception about foods (the beneficial effects of olive oil was the first).

Milk actually reduces calcium in your bones. Similarly to all animal proteins, milk acidifies the body pH level, which then triggers a biological correction. Calcium is an excellent acid neutraliser and since the biggest storage of calcium in the body your bones, then the very same calcium in your bones is utilized to neutralize the acidic effect of milk. Once calcium is pulled out of the bones, it leaves the body via the urine, and the net result is an actual calcium deficit. No wonder why statistics indicate that countries with the lowest consumption of dairy products also have the lowest fracture incidence in their population, while Denmark is on the top of the hip and other fracture statistics. A recent Swedish study published not long ago in the British Medical Journal points out that drinking three glasses of milk per day results in increased incidence of osteoporosis, bone fractures, and earlier mortality. These are independent university researches. On the other hand, as far as I know all researches/studies that suggest the benefits of milk (mainly the calcium myth) are funded by the diary industry.

Plant based sources of calcium such as leafy greens, nuts, dried basil are both healthier and more easily absorbed. One cup serving of soybean sprouts provides 46 per cent of daily calcium requirements which is the equivalent of a glass and a half of milk, except the soybean provides you with only 30 calories, which reduced calories intake is obviously better (for the vast majority of population). I fully understand by now that it is not applicable to you as you need an incredible amount of extreme calories for your top athlete regime, but 99.999% of the population is not in the league of Kobe Bryant and yourself, and therefore I think they should know that diary product is not good for human body (which I have been banging-on in the last few pages).

There are a few very good documentaries that summarizes how the diary industry and their sockpuppets in the FDA mislead the population about the benefit of milks.

I am sure you are having strong teeth despite of milk, and not because of milk. Your strong teeth most likely because of your genetics.

This link is interesting.
http://saveourbones.com/osteoporosis-milk-myth/


598  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic Totalitarianism on: October 03, 2015, 12:50:05 AM

You appear to be taking it too far into religion and no longer science.


I told you that I am enjoying nice tuna steaks, salmon, trout and all kind of seafood at least once a week so I am not a religious vegan at all. I have no issues with vegans who try to save animals, in the meantime I don't subscribe to their doctrine.
Which I thought was important to point out is that many studies, researches and my personal experience as well indicate that plant based/vegan diet is very beneficial and most of the cases substitute all medications for heart and diabetes cases (the biggest killers in the US and UK). Almost all those heart and diabetes patients who are disciplined and never eat meat experience with reversal, and even the less disciplined who eat fish like me have a very good result.


I am not sure yet which foods I need, but I guarantee you that I would be a skeleton if I ate only vegetables. There is no way I could carry the muscle mass that enables me to be an athlete.

I think raw WILD (not farmed!) vegetables are very important for the micronutrients, the probiotics, and other aspects. But I doubt very much that cutting out all saturated fat is optimum healthy for an athlete. Bill Walton's career was plagued with bone injuries probably because he was 100% vegan.


OK. I misunderstood you then. I thought you are having a very serious, potentially terminal health condition, multiple sclerosis, but it seems you are in fact aiming to continue be an athlete while having such serious condition. I am not sure how the MS condition and an athletic lifestyle can coexist, but I hope you can manage it.

That's great you feel well, try to stay healthy and active :-)))


599  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: October 03, 2015, 12:11:19 AM
Thats EXACTLY the time to buy. You pretty much said the same thing I was saying. It moves to simply find liquidity, the shortest path to the most liquidity wins. Stoplosses provide liquidity.

I understand that about stop losses, and if that was the case today, then it were some very level headed and cool traders who pulled off that 400 points jump under such job data conditions and hostile bearish climate. Even 90% of experienced floor traders couldn't understand what's happening, but yes, you could be right that's what happened.
600  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: October 02, 2015, 11:59:53 PM
And yes, theoretically the rates should have relation to the market place - even if we didn't see that today morning. Morning we saw the panic about the economy, but afternoon was all about the rates. In my opinion the 400 points jump was actually due to the fact that traders realized there won't be any rate hike and the free money will available a bit longer, so they came back to the market.

Or that retailers went short/panicked and it was a good chance to slaughter them or entice them to get in again to rinse and repeat short term.

Could be that as well, I certainly can't prove otherwise.

Personally, I would be very surprised if any retailers would buy anything following that job data and sudden drop. I spoke many those retailer bulls during the day in person, on phone, over the internet and all of them were scared to buy anything. People like me who shorted were calm and happy, but I didn't meet any retailers who was buying. Even floor traders were confused like hell.

  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 [30] 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 ... 93 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!