Let's explain the scam:

I've just tested this by copying a bc1q-address from BlueWallet to Mycelium, and it works without errors.

In that case: your Mycelium is set to Bitcoin, and not ETH, right?

Or even more n00b: did you get a Bitcoin address from BlueWallet, or did you create a Lightning payment request? Those are a lot longer and won't work in Mycelium indeed.

I'm surprised Ledger just lists Discontinued products without any links on how to recover the funds.
I'm following this topic to add the solution to my overview of old storage formats.

Note: after recovering your Bitcoins from an old wallet, you may want check for Forkcoins on your addresses.

I have Opposed the Flag because you have no evidence. I've seen mixers that could use a Letter of Guarantee, but choose not to provide it. That means they don't provide the customer with the means to prove foul play, and that means they're partially to blame for having a scam accusation without evidence.
In this case however, MyCryptoMixer provides all users with a signed Letter of Guarantee. You could (and should) have saved the LoG before making a deposit. Therefore, the lack of evidence is entirely on you, and I'm not comfortable Flagging a user because of that.

I will however leave neutral feedback with this post as Reference.

That's not enough, if you use non onion websites on Tor, many exit nodes try to steal your Bitcoin:

Let me guess: he busted some of your alts and now you're on a witch hunt to get him?

If you see shitposts, click "Report to moderator" and type "shitpost". It's really that simple.

My largest trusted amounts also never resulted in any feedback. That's okay, it keeps people private.

Thanks again for your flawless timing

---

---

Should I change the title to "LoyceV's Avatar 101"?

I've added the link, I'll leave it to the reader to choose read everything.

I've removed your post (because of the large quote), but answer it anyway: no, that's not possible.

Have you tried to use it as a Brain Wallet on (offline air gapped) Bitaddress.org? Try both standard and compressed, and see if either one of them produces your Bitcoin address.

7+7=14

Great, I can only encourage that. But I don't think you should be on DT already while you're still learning this.

This is a bannable offense, so just report them.

There's no rule against that, and as far as I know the community consensus is in favour of tagging alts of scammers.

If it's ban evasion, report it, and get him banned.

That means they (can) trust you, it doesn't mean you (can/should) trust them. It's a crucial distinction.

Why worry about what a Newbie says about you? Why worry about the opinion of anyone who's judgement you don't value, especially on the internet? With thousands of people on Bitcointalk, you'll stumble upon someone you disagree with eventually. That's okay.

Since YOSHIE removed his inclusion, I've removed my exclusion. There's no point in excluding you now, and if you improve on doing what's widely considered to be correct use of the Trust system, you may be included again in the future.

No. I have no problems with tags for those reasons. It's the tags for other reasons that got you excluded, see this topic for some discussion on the subject.

There is no "team", just one guy. All you can do is wait for him to (wake up and) respond.

Bitcoins don't get "lost" this way, they stay in your original wallet until the transaction confirms.

Fees are still high, as long as your wallet keeps broadcasting the transaction, it doesn't drop from mempool.
You've been offered several solutions, if you have the receiving address in Electrum, all you have to do is making a new transaction to your own address with a high fee.

I see several crucial mistakes, and I'm going to point them out because I really don't get why people keep doing this:

Mistakes made

• Depositing before downloading, saving and verifying the Letter of Guarantee
• Sending a large amount of Bitcoin to a relatively small and unknown service
• Sending your entire Bitcoin savings at once to a third party
• Keeping your life savings entirely in Bitcoin

All of this means you literally have no proof whatsoever to backup your claims, while you could and should have had a signed message. But even then, a one-man operation could be very tempted to take such a large (and for many people life-changing) amount of Bitcoin. Selective scamming has happened before and will happen again. It's trival to add an "if amount large enough, then don't return it"-setting to the server routines.

I'm following this case to see how it evolves. In a similar (but much smaller) case the mixer said the funds were sent to a different address:

I wouldn't recommend Linux From Scratch or Gentoo. Apart from a very steep learning curve, you're probably better off with a distribution that's secure out of the box.

I found Best Linux distros for privacy and security in 2021 an interesting read, although the privacy focused distributions aren't really meant for permanent installations.

Yes, and when I do, I'll PM all users who updated their code to join through a new self-moderated thread so I can keep it short. But as always, I need the time.

Unlikely:

There's no irony involved, he still advertises the address and thus still has access.

Webhosting doesn't pay for itself, so he probably still has access.

But "nV" isn't part of it, otherwise the number of characters fits indeed: