When I download the Windows binary miner, both Chrome browser and Kaspersky Anti-Virus say there is a virus, and stop it.
False positive. download bitcoin wallet and test with that. |
|
|
|
It's very possible, FIMK is just a clone of NXT and it collected 700+ BTC, so 2000BTC is very easy for Crypti, let's wait and see.
I can't believe this is true. It seems the 2nd gen is getting more and more popular. Unfortunately it's true, see this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=633304.0Developers could you please state whether Proof-of-Identity and Proof-of-Purchase are decentralised or centralised? |
|
|
|
It's very possible, FIMK is just a clone of NXT and it collected 700+ BTC, so 2000BTC is very easy for Crypti, let's wait and see.
I can't believe this is true. It seems the 2nd gen is getting more and more popular. Unfortunately it's true, see this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=633304.0If FIMK can raise 700btc, why people don't invest in NAS NTX NFD??? and BTS will be 10 times better than NTX colone, and will be better than NXT for sure. WHY only raised 5000BTC Cash value before FEB 28?  This is laughable. NXT has a dedicated hard-core dev team, which has written their own crypto-currency from scratch. It's like having a living Nakamoto continually working on the cryptocurrency making it better. All these other clones are just copy and paste and small modifications. They don't even come close. NXT will be launching a decentralised market place soon. The only one that looks interesting is FIMK because they have some real developer who is able to make non-trivial changes to add a block reward, solving one of NXT's biggest drawbacks. |
|
|
|
|
We are still waiting for the final numbers and details from the IPO that show both the non-escrow and escrow funds received. They are supposed to be posted today.
|
|
|
|
@ Eliphaz Fimk
Will you reconsider not releasing the Source code on July 15?
(I think this is a big "threat" for FIMK investors) and will just lead to more FIMK clones.
In my opinion you should wait at list 90 days before releasing the source code.
+1 Release source code later, much later. |
|
|
|
▦ 币种算法： PoS+PoW There are no proof of work. One of this post's topic is "POW-like rewards", so... That just means there's a block reward. FIMK is still purely POS, which is great for the environment. FIMK is like NXT on steroids. There's real block rewards for years to come!!! Arguably one of the biggest downsides to NXT. |
|
|
|
The last 150 to 200 BTC will be likely cancelled, exact total tally is still under scrutiny with DGEX until Monday.
We can already see no other cases approaching near the 10% are apparent, closer inspection will confirm this but probably there'll be no need to lower the % for other than the final 200 BTC donator who is suspected of trying to use several accounts (and if that is the case he will not be granted more than the second highest donator of some 30 BTC).
Thanks. We're looking forward to some concrete numbers. |
|
|
|
We really want to know the total amount of BTC received in IPO minus suspicious amounts received through dgex. We need an official announcement and full audit-able list in order to be open and transparent.
Answer is 500 BTC700 BTC-200 BTC=500 BTCRound numbers. Is this confirmed by official FIMK devs? |
|
|
|
|
We really want to know the total amount of BTC received in IPO minus suspicious amounts received through dgex. We need an official announcement and full audit-able list in order to be open and transparent.
|
|
|
|
I keep hearing VRC people saying that their verisend is better than darksend. Is this true?
Lmfao. Verisend doesnt exist, and its trusted Plus a copy of Darksend.. Darksend isnt trusted like Verisend "will be" Vericoin hasnt delivered on a single thing they said they would. The devs are just pumping/dumping that coin with fake announcements lmao.. +1 Verisend is a joke. |
|
|
|
From news here http://fimk.fi/en/"Stakeholder donation period closed. FIMK received more than 500 BTC from donators. Thank you!" I only see 233.35346845 BTC at the IPO address https[Suspicious link removed]mWLxWtWEwPUztNLk3VGx Your website does not show any other IPO addresses, so where did the extra 267 BTC come from? dgex That's not good enough. Where is this visible? dgex serves as escrow, i also invested via dgex. Where is this visible on the dgex or fimk websites? Login dgex. You can see the notice of fimk escrow. Thanks. |
|
|
|
From news here http://fimk.fi/en/"Stakeholder donation period closed. FIMK received more than 500 BTC from donators. Thank you!" I only see 233.35346845 BTC at the IPO address https[Suspicious link removed]mWLxWtWEwPUztNLk3VGx Your website does not show any other IPO addresses, so where did the extra 267 BTC come from? dgex That's not good enough. Where is this visible? dgex serves as escrow, i also invested via dgex. Where is this visible on the dgex or fimk websites? |
|
|
|
From news here http://fimk.fi/en/"Stakeholder donation period closed. FIMK received more than 500 BTC from donators. Thank you!" I only see 233.35346845 BTC at the IPO address https[Suspicious link removed]mWLxWtWEwPUztNLk3VGx Your website does not show any other IPO addresses, so where did the extra 267 BTC come from? dgex That's not good enough. Where is this visible? |
|
|
|
|
I support this coin. FIMK is essentially NXT with block rewards. It solves one of NXT's big downsides. Very interesting and non-trivial.
+10 for FIMK
|
|
|
|
I just need to be able to send XCP.  I confirm * Enough BTC: Yes * At least a few confirmations: overs 1 months * Bitcoind is running and configured properly: no errors in my debug.log * Waited 10-20 min, 2 week, 2 months: always get this error Here's my bug report: counterpartyd --unsigned send --source <from> --destination <to> --quantity 200 --asset XCP Transaction (unsigned): 0100000002c1eef0f50d2951e0ce71f70dff630291e6de6b1795a0ccc4f20ab944e4cebaa900000 0001976a914cbeefd1b44465e6f30fb50add2d27ec4d64a771888acffffffff084360e4a725dd0c 4c696f2a002ec7522e8235c32bae2d3e01cfa9240dcd80d9020000001976a914cbeefd1b44465e6 f30fb50add2d27ec4d64a771888acffffffff036c2a0000000000001976a914b22854289bda0c16 0cb353a00e2a2fda86b640ef88ac6c2a000000000000475121032bff26e6179750c88ffb4aa1eb6 a8cfc00878d72222ea0bcd768f28de29a6b29211c434e5452505254590000000000000000000000 0100000004a817c8000000000052ae36150000000000001976a914cbeefd1b44465e6f30fb50add 2d27ec4d64a771888ac00000000 Try it with the option --encoding='op_return'. That should work, because it's just a send transaction. If doesn't, try bumping up the two DUST_SIZE values in the file config.py, restarting the server process, and trying again. When Bitcoind rejects a transaction, it should say why in debug.log. The relevant message is usually rather hard to find, however. Thanks for the help, but it seems --encoding='op_return' is an unrecognised argument. Found this in log ERROR: CTxMemPool::accept() : nonstandard transaction (dust) |
|
|
|
I just need to be able to send XCP. I confirm * Enough BTC: Yes * At least a few confirmations: overs 1 months * Bitcoind is running and configured properly: no errors in my debug.log * Waited 10-20 min, 2 week, 2 months: always get this error Here's my bug report: counterpartyd --unsigned send --source <from> --destination <to> --quantity 200 --asset XCP Transaction (unsigned): 0100000002c1eef0f50d2951e0ce71f70dff630291e6de6b1795a0ccc4f20ab944e4cebaa900000 0001976a914cbeefd1b44465e6f30fb50add2d27ec4d64a771888acffffffff084360e4a725dd0c 4c696f2a002ec7522e8235c32bae2d3e01cfa9240dcd80d9020000001976a914cbeefd1b44465e6 f30fb50add2d27ec4d64a771888acffffffff036c2a0000000000001976a914b22854289bda0c16 0cb353a00e2a2fda86b640ef88ac6c2a000000000000475121032bff26e6179750c88ffb4aa1eb6 a8cfc00878d72222ea0bcd768f28de29a6b29211c434e5452505254590000000000000000000000 0100000004a817c8000000000052ae36150000000000001976a914cbeefd1b44465e6f30fb50add 2d27ec4d64a771888ac00000000 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
