Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 04:40:58 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 [62] 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 ... 164 »
1221  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Litecoin is pissing me off. on: November 03, 2013, 07:19:05 PM
I think you're making too much of an apples and oranges comparison, it might be more accurately stated: Bitcoin is the Holy Lance of Saint Longinus while Litecoin is Jesus' surfboard.
1222  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast launches sales of the Baby Jet on: November 03, 2013, 07:03:51 PM
Grin im glad i made u laugh.
soon you will see exactly what happens and you will join everyone else and cry.
you will attempt lawsuits and fail.
your money will be gone.
and you will at best get a machine that will never pay off.

I bought during the sale, so if it comes at pretty much any time before Dec 1st I'll still ROI. *shrug*

I think HashFast's goal is to get everything out before then so they have no liabilities with the MPP, and get to keep the piles of money that everyone gave them for it (at which point maybe people will start complaining about that).  They sound pretty confident about the "Before Dec 31" for batch one.
1223  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Is Litecoin massively undervalued? on: November 03, 2013, 05:52:20 PM
^^ Slight aside, but I'm in Canada and I pay $0.15 / kWh.  The rates are technically pretty low, but after taxes and nebulous fees I end up paying that much.
1224  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Is Litecoin massively undervalued? on: November 03, 2013, 05:40:13 PM
You haven't proven that ASIC Miners withold coins at a higher rate than GPU miners did.  I mined with GPU for 18 months and sold less than 10% of my coins to cover electrical costs.  Still while daily volume may be lower than total supply it is much larger than the rate of NEW production.  New ASIC miners don't "own" the complete supply they only "own" the newly created coins which is a tiny portion of the market now.  It was different in 2010 when the daily production was sometimes more than daily exchange volume but those days are gone.

Well, that's true, I didn't spend most of the coins I mined with GPUs either, but I meant more of that being a possible example of how the spending of coins mined might affect price.

Since we have actual data, I suppose an interesting thing to do would be to track how coins are spent after being mined in a block, and then see if we can use this to predict historical BTC prices.  I suspect this might be difficult because of the way pools are setup, but it's a neat idea.
1225  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Is Litecoin massively undervalued? on: November 03, 2013, 04:27:06 PM
The price is the result of supply&demand equilibrium, and not result of electricity wasted.

The price is always the result of supply and demand equilibrium -- but you don't think the cost of production plays into the quantities of a commodity that people are willing to sell for a given price (supply)?

No.  If it was then GPU miners would simply keep mining and sell their coins for $800 per BTC.   Miners have almost no pricing power.   If difficulty gets too high relative to price then some miners will quit and difficulty will go back down.

Uh...? You don't think the boom in the beginning of the year had anything to do at all with ASICminer and Avalon suddenly controlling almost all of the newly generated BTC supply?

No.  Correlation is not causation.  Why would Avalon miners not sell coins at a higher rate than GPU miners?  The number of miners is irrelevant the amount of production remains the same.  If anything the continually rising hashrate means that production is about 30% higher than the target.  Still the amount of coins relative to daily trading volume is a small fraction (and shrinking).  

Because if you don't sell the coins, you constrict the supply entering exchanges, thereby disrupting supply-demand equilibrium and pushing price up?  The volume of coins traded daily on an exchange is small compared to the total supply of coins.
1226  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Is Litecoin massively undervalued? on: November 03, 2013, 04:07:30 PM
The price is the result of supply&demand equilibrium, and not result of electricity wasted.

The price is always the result of supply and demand equilibrium -- but you don't think the cost of production plays into the quantities of a commodity that people are willing to sell for a given price (supply)?

No.  If it was then GPU miners would simply keep mining and sell their coins for $800 per BTC.   Miners have almost no pricing power.   If difficulty gets too high relative to price then some miners will quit and difficulty will go back down.

Uh...? You don't think the boom in the beginning of the year had anything to do at all with ASICminer and Avalon suddenly controlling almost all of the newly generated BTC supply?
1227  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Is Litecoin massively undervalued? on: November 03, 2013, 01:30:36 PM
The price is the result of supply&demand equilibrium, and not result of electricity wasted.

The price is always the result of supply and demand equilibrium -- but you don't think the cost of production plays into the quantities of a commodity that people are willing to sell for a given price (supply)?


Nope, the only use of Litecoin is speculation, and not many want to put money in.

I personally wont as I believe Litecoin is overvalued and I dont want to burn money

Well, people mining BTC may see it differently, though, as they are only putting a little work and investment into obtaining BTC with current hardware and can easily trade this BTC for comparatively more difficult to generate LTC.
1228  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Is Litecoin massively undervalued? on: November 03, 2013, 02:25:33 AM
Also you have to take into account the value of your equipment after you depose of it.

I've been mining Alt-coins over 1 year on a graphics card I bought for ~$80 sold for ~$45, I've made an ROI on that card many times over.

If i buy ASIC mining equipment I maybe get my 100% ROI back but the value of that equipment may get only 5-10% of what I paid for it.

I've already had the value of ASIC equipment drop 1600% of what I paid for it, and I didn't get an 100% ROI on it.

Well, this is going to end pretty soon.  SHA256 ASICs went from a 110 nm process to a 28 nm process within 10 months, whereas lately we tend to get stuck on process nodes for a year or two.  We'll probably wall for a while at 1-2 GH/s per watt, and from that point onward we would expect ASIC hardware to devalue at a rate similar to GPUs.
1229  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Is Litecoin massively undervalued? on: November 02, 2013, 07:06:57 PM
The price is the result of supply&demand equilibrium, and not result of electricity wasted.

The price is always the result of supply and demand equilibrium -- but you don't think the cost of production plays into the quantities of a commodity that people are willing to sell for a given price (supply)?
1230  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Is Litecoin massively undervalued? on: November 02, 2013, 06:59:29 PM
I've been playing around with a few metrics to try to determine how to value LTC versus BTC; these are:
1. Return in USD per day per USD invested
2. Cost of electricity to produce 1 USD

Let's start with 1.

BTC: KnC 275 GH/s @ $3,000
$200.00 per coin
0.3485 coins/day at difficulty 391m
or 69.70 USD/day after electicity (300 watts), 1.5% fee, 0.15 cents/kWh
0.0232333 USD day ^-1 USD invested^-1

LTC: 40x 7950 (+PSU/mobo/memory/HDD valued at $4000) @ $12,000
$2.40 per coin
23.8434 coins/day at difficulty 1080
or $27.632 USD/day after electicity (9600 watts), 1.5% fee, 0.15 cents/kWh
0.002302666 USD day^-1 USD invested^-1

How does this look if we chart it out, with BTC difficulty inflating at a rate of 25% every two weeks and LTC difficulty inflating at a rate of 2% every two weeks, given constant prices for both currencies?



Well, that's pretty interesting.  In order to hit the same USD return per day per investment dollar, BTC difficulty needs to increase at the same rate (25% per two weeks) for 22 weeks, or almost half a year.

How about 2, cost of electricity to produce 1 USD for both currencies?

With BTC at $200 USD and LTC at $2.40 USD, the equivalent of 1 USD is 0.005 BTC and 0.41666 LTC respectively.
How much power is used to produce this 1 USD?  The calculations should be pretty straightforward, so I won't detail them here, but you should be able to plug this into allchains.info and see it for yourself.

BTC
KnC Saturn @ 275 GH/s, 300 W at the wall, 1.5% pool fee, difficulty 391M
0.0154949785 cents per USD

LTC
7970 @ 630 KH/s, 225 W at the wall (my own measurements from one of my rigs), 1.5% pool fee, difficulty 1080
0.5887987788 cents per USD

That's a 40 fold greater cost of electricity to produce 1 USD in LTC as compared to BTC!  Of course, over time and progressive difficulty increases this will continued to come down, but unless there are massive price swings in the near future or ultra efficient LTC FPGAs/ASICs come out, the cost of production of 1 USD with Litecoin will continue to be many fold that of Bitcoin.

Finally, it's worth mentioning that LTC block reward will undergo halving in less than 2 years time, while Bitcoin is looking at 3.5 years from the current date.

Feel free to point out any stupid oversights or assumptions, but these have been my thoughts over the past week or so, especially as BTC price continues to rise.
1231  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [ANN] US/North American Bitfury sales now open ***full prototype pics*** on: November 02, 2013, 09:39:34 AM

I have 200 aluminium heatsinks waiting to slap all over my boards :X


What are the specs for the heatsinks?

14x14x7mm aluminium with thermal tape on back
1232  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: November 02, 2013, 04:34:36 AM
People who bought before August 15th and are looking to obtain a refund, HashFast has told me that there is internal arbitration going on for this matter and that a decision about whether or not you will be able to refund your purchase will be made by Monday.
1233  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast launches sales of the Baby Jet on: November 01, 2013, 09:13:57 PM
The protocol docs indicate the thermal thorttling is handled by the GN processor in high level mode

What is the maximum operating temp?
What is the clock/core throttling temp?
What is the thermal shutdown temp?

I'll ask them this tomorrow with my next listing of questions
1234  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [ANN] US/North American Bitfury sales now open ***full prototype pics*** on: November 01, 2013, 09:12:42 PM
Initial testing is pretty crazy - full rigs at 570G.  Please get your case fans ready folks...you will have to add fans!

  dont try to run without fan or you will get fry chip and add heatsink are +++++++.

I have 200 aluminium heatsinks waiting to slap all over my boards :X

Is it safe to just stick them on the back?  It won't short anything, there's a second layer or it's coated?
1235  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [ANN] US/North American Bitfury sales now open ***full prototype pics*** on: November 01, 2013, 07:09:36 PM
Just got some product - SHIPPING BEGINS TODAY!

I'll be checking my e-mail compulsively
1236  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: November 01, 2013, 07:08:38 PM
Who's 'their guy' in Australia that is making their stuff?  Is he the one with the bad substrates? 

Did they get their limited edition seasonic power supplies yet?

They won't give me any information on where the fudge ups occurred beyond, "It was entirely the fault of our company," so we may never know
1237  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: November 01, 2013, 07:06:16 PM
Taco Time,

Any news on refunds for those that were given a ship date of October 20th-30th when they purchased their miners before the August 15th change of the TOS?

Ninjapro talks about how professional they seem but a professional company does not give out a shipping date, says they are on track until 2 days before that said shipping date, announce delays, and then deny refunds.

I really did believe in this company and that's why I purchased Baby Jet instead of a 2nd Jupiter.  I would have been hashing with the Jupiter right now.

I sent another e-mail asking about this again, and also asking for board/case dimensions as I'm getting lots of requests for these

As I said before, HF is only telling me "Batch one will definitely be out before or on Dec 31, 2013."  I wish I could provide you guys with something more solid, but that's all I've been told.

Also: I can confirm that fiat purchases with MPP will still use BTC as the metric for giving additional hardware, based on the value of BTC on the day of purchase.
1238  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: November 01, 2013, 10:14:45 AM
Hashfast can we get board dimensions and/or diagram/layout?

I'll send another email

Sorry I've been deadly sick with something
1239  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: I'm About to Quit Mining on: October 30, 2013, 10:54:13 PM
Buying BTC is good advice if BTC doesn't tank to 5% of its value like it did over the course of 2011-2012.

Everyone here is really excited by the prospect of buying BTC because the price has gone up lately, and seem to be amnesic about when it spent forever tanking.  But the same thing goes for any commodities market, the traders are often bipolar and impulsive.

I'll stop mining when mining stops being profitable -- but so far over the past 3 years of mining and saving half and spending the rest on more miners, I've been making a killing.  The crazy thing about mining is that it's still profitable even when BTC/LTC is imploding.

The people who think that bitcoin's rise in price will continually destroy other equities and commodities markets month over month and year over year are probably the ones who will be in for the biggest shocks in the future.
1240  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: October 30, 2013, 10:42:54 PM
So.. TacoTime..

I have a few questions..

1)Are they still on track to ship in mid-november? (shipping in 2 weeks™)
What does their timeline look like?
Batch 1 will ship by Dec 31 2013
Batch 2 will probably ship by Dec 31 2013
HF isn't saying anything else

Quote
2)How soon after they ship batch 1 will they start shipping batch 2?
It seems like while the preorders from batch 1 are the people who funded and supported you, yet batch 2 will be getting the better end of the deal.
Why have you forsaken us (batch 1 customers)?
They haven't given me solid details, but you'll be the first to receive a product for sure.

Quote
3)When I purchased my miner (August 8th), there was nothing on the TOS about the Miners being shipped by the December 31st (which was added on August 15th).  The only date they had anywhere was a big SHIPPING STARTS OCTOBER 20th to OCTOBER 30th on their site.
Do I get any compensation for being lied to?
Can I request a refund?
Do I have to make a complaint to the FTC and seek some sort of legal action?
The company rep said that she forwarded this complaint to the higher ups after I told them that this was unfair and that you guys should be allowed refunds.  I'll let you know more about it as soon as I do.
Pages: « 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 [62] 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 ... 164 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!