At 67 sat/byte (108 sat/vbyte), it was probably enough when you created the transaction. But then fees went up, which usually happens if the next block takes a while to be found. The problem/reason is that fee estimates are based on past transactions, while the required fee depends on future transactions and block times. And because many people use a wallet that automatically adjusts the fee to be included in the next block, fees quickly spiral upwards all the time. Considering the fee you paid, it'll probably be included when a few blocks are found in quick succession. Update: I've added your transaction to ViaBTC's Accelerator. As far as I know, that's the only free and working accelerator out there. But ViaBTC doesn't find that many blocks. |
|
|
|
Hi, Synapsi.com admin here. It looks like you once used our service, and even though we shut it down, we've recently been going through our Database backup and found out you have some funds locked in escrow for question "Manual Override Dynamic Fee in Copay wallet". Kuddos for the honesty, that's about $30,000 by now! Would you be interested in getting them back? Although I know nothing about Copay (and can't find the escrow address): judging by this post, it might have been community funded (by different people): |
|
|
|
"Dusting" - does this mean sending/receiving a tiny amount? Yes. And to clarify, @Loyce, are you suggesting I send you (via PM?) a receiving address, and you'll send me a tiny/insignificant amount of BCH? Correct. Just to be sure: you'll need to include my BCH-dust in the transaction you're going to send. Do you mean the transaction from Electron Cash to my Ledger Nano S? Or somewhere else? It doesn't matter where you send it, as long as there is at least one input that only excists on the chain you're sending, it can't replay on the other chains. There's the ElectrumSV wallet, and it looks like it has a coin-splitting feature built in. But I guess I was hoping it would be possible to basically repeat the process of importing the seed to claim the fork coins. So, just like I installed Electron Cash, imported the old BTC seed, which made my BCH balance appear, couldn't I now install Electrum SV, import that same seed, and the balance of BSV would appear? But I guess the splitting of BCH and BSV does not work this way. ElectrumSV worked terrible, it's very different from normal Electrum. And I don't trust them, that's why I prefer to use Coinomi for BSV. |
|
|
|
Btw what tool do you use to check merit amount received? BPIP  |
|
|
|
It's been a while: please ban Sr. Member maldini Banned! (with 58 "earned" Merits) for plagiarism: Original: Questions:
1. When and why did you become interested in cryptocurrencies?
It was on the month of June 2017 when I first heard about cryptocurrencies from one of my closest friend. During class and thesis discussion, we talked about our dream of owning automatic watches and he introduced to me this website. He told me that he was participating into campaign signatures and he was earning money weekly by contributing knowledge to the forum. After he introduced me to this website, I joined this forum knowing NOTHING but only earning money in my mind. I did not know what cryptocurrencies are and about the technology behind it. I quickly messaged various campaign signatures if I could participate as a newbie without even knowing anything about cryptocurrencies!
After a couple of weeks, I felt that I had this obligation to know and explore the wonders of cryptocurrencies as I read that the blockchain technology revolutionized on how payment works using cryptocurrencies. Until this day, I am still at the learning process and I strive each day to learn more about cryptocurrencies so I can share my knowledge to aspiring investors or members in this forum.
2. When and why did you buy your first bitcoin?
The truth is, I never actually bought any bitcoin using my money but I mostly earned them from the campaign signatures I participated way back in 2017. Unfortunately, living with a family of 5 with a single dad was a difficult time for me. Most of my earnings were converted into books that I have been using until now so I can at least help my dad in mitigating his expenses. Instead of using the money he receives from his job to buy my materials, he can allocate it to my younger brothers and for our daily needs. In a way, I indirectly help my dad while I also support myself into buying all the required study materials. Copy (using a text spinner): Much obliged to you zasad@ for the incredible chance to be met
1. When and why did you become interested in cryptocurrencies?
It was on June 2017 when I previously found out about cryptographic forms of money from one of my dearest companion. During class and proposal conversation, we discussed our fantasy about claiming programmed watches and he acquainted with me this site. He revealed to me that he was partaking into crusade marks and he was acquiring cash week by week by contributing information to the gathering. After he acquainted me with this site, I joined this gathering knowing NOTHING however just acquiring cash in my psyche. I was immediately intrigued, yet since I'm a wary individual essentially it required some investment to bounce on board. From that point forward I've been following the crypto showcases day by day and it's become a second activity.
2. When and why did you buy your first bitcoin?
I generally earned them from the mission marks I partook path in 2017. Sadly, living with a group of 5 with a single parent was a troublesome time for me. The majority of my income were changed over into books that I have been utilizing up to this point so I can at any rate help my father in relieving his costs. I was associated with a ton of tasks on the Internet, so I couldn't help suspecting that it was not awful to build my portfolio somewhat more. I bought an entirety of 0.006BTC worth $111.10 when bitcoin cost was $1200 in 2016 or somewhere in the vicinity, the motivation behind why I got it was the reason for utilizing it in ponzi plans which toward the end I lost it until I found a real methods of utilizing bitcoin. I hate text spinners, they're very hard to catch. So it feels great to catch a high-ranking shitposters again!
I found the one above when I was searching for plagiarism evidence on a Newbie bounty spammer who used words that typically come from a text spinner. Many parts of his post seem to be taken from various other posts, which makes it very difficult to pinpoint plagiarism. But I think the first line alone is enough, so please ban Newbie CryptoBD420 for plagiarism. Original: Hello , i want to interview and thanks zasad@ for give me chance This quote of a deleted post is exactly the same as what CryptoBD420 posted, and my archived version of this post shows that CryptoBD420 copied BountyHive verbatim. Copy: Hello , i want to interview and thanks zasad@ for give me chance Stupidity: 12. How much will Bitcoin cost at the end of 2020?
I anticipate that BTC should be 20000$+ If only he knew what he was typing... |
|
|
|
Do they at least provide an option to generate a new deposit address? No, but you can still withdraw up to 2 BTC/day on Binance, so you can create a new account each time. It's terrible for privacy, but they're not the only one: Bittrex provides only one deposit address too, and from what I've seen most online casino's are the same. |
|
|
|
But.. Do you think that cm didn’t get the quality advertising they paid for because of this?
I think they still probably did, and it wouldn’t be a problem other than their specific rule to not allow alt accounts..
He is obviously a high quality poster to have achieved what he has.. I have made similar arguments in the past. As long as they are not talking to eachother, CM received advertising for xx posts, and paid for xx posts. The post quality was good enough that he was accepted into the campaign over other applicants, and was not removed when other applicants applied. I would see the 50 post limit as a means to control the budget. I would be curious if DS would be open to allowing someone in the CM campaign to apply for one of the open spots with the account he is already participating with, so that he could potentailly be paid for 100 posts/week as opposed to 50 posts per week. I'm pretty sure DarkStar_ won't allow that. This rule is very clear: 1. We will pay a maximum of 50 posts every week. I've made more than the maximum number of posts in most weeks. I didn't get paid for any posts above that, which is fine. If you have to compare this to a job, compare it to a high-paying job that expects employees to do unpaid overtime once in a while. Pretending to be someone else to get those hours paid is fraud. |
|
|
|
|
Bump: the cat is back (on DT2)!
|
|
|
|
Do you guys hope he stops posting on all of his accounts and goes away forever, or do you think he is still a somewhat valuable member of the community even though he gamed the system to make more coin?
Would an admission and apology from him help any?
Where do you think he really stands now? That's entirely up to him. Forum rules allow everything he did, but he betrayed the community. The community can't stop him from posting. I wouldn't be surprised if he doesn't post anything at all anymore. Only theymos and Cyrus have access to IP logs, not the moderators. I would also be very surprised if it turned out they were arbitrarily looking up user's IP logs just for the fun of it without some prior suspicion or indication. The Cryptios people have IP-access too. |
|
|
|
When I read this post: PN7 was exposed mainly on linguistic proof. FOMA worked hard to dispute it. I'm quite sure that this was an attempt to discredit such proof in case this type of link was ever established between his accounts. It gave me a crazy idea: would you be able to add Statistical Methods for Natural Language Processing? It would be very cool to get the result for any 2 usernames selected! I know, I know, it's very easy to come up with features that take a lot of work to implement, and a large amount of processing power to crunch the numbers. But I had to ask! |
|
|
|
Unlocked: the problem is back  For a few days now, my Watchlist is getting slower, it now takes ~24 seconds to load. Deleting a couple dozen old entries didn't help. Posting a new post is also slow, and Show the last topics started by this person is a bit slow. Loading topics and user's post history works fine. |
|
|
|
Eh, I average 75 posts on a good week and it's not unusual to see me at 60 posts per week. And there are some people here who can do even more than 75 (I read in his services thread for example that @Ratimov can do over 100 posts a week). See Top posters on Bitcointalk in the past 7 days: only a few people post more than 100 posts per week. Then again, I can't know who uses multiple accounts. |
|
|
|
Quoting myself: Old code:
time cat <(gunzip -c addresses_in_order_of_first_appearance.txt.gz) daily_updates/*.txt | nl | sort -uk2 -S40% | sort -nk1 -S40% | cut -f2 | gzip > newchronological.txt.gz New code:
time cat <(gunzip -c addresses_in_order_of_first_appearance.txt.gz) <(cat <(cat <(cat daily_updates/*.txt | nl | sort -uk2 -S40% | sort -nk1 -S40% | cut -f2) <(comm -13 <(gunzip -c addresses_sorted.txt.gz) <(sort -u daily_updates/*.txt)) | nl -nln | sort -k2 -S80%) | uniq -df1 | sort -nk1 -S80% | cut -f2) > new.alladdresses_chronological.txt I tried again: time cat <(gunzip -c addresses_in_order_of_first_appearance.txt.gz) daily_updates/*.txt | nl | sort -uk2 -S40% | sort -nk1 -S40% | cut -f2 > oldcode.txt
time cat <(gunzip -c addresses_in_order_of_first_appearance.txt.gz) <(cat <(cat <(cat daily_updates/*.txt | nl | sort -uk2 -S40% | sort -nk1 -S40% | cut -f2) <(comm -13 <(gunzip -c addresses_sorted.txt.gz) <(sort -u daily_updates/*.txt)) | nl -nln | sort -k2 -S80%) | uniq -df1 | sort -nk1 -S80% | cut -f2) > newcode.txt The files were too large to diff, so I split them in parts (10 million lines each). There are a few differences: < 3BS6oQKHDwrzz4RC69iAbSV13xpbGZvXLj
---
> 3BS6oQKHDwrzz4SC69iAbSV13xpbGZvXLj
< 17Q7LN9nCmS6HdjkDj3C4MdhduFobGp4hv
---
> 17Q7LN9nCmS6HdjkDk3C4MdhduFobGp4hv
< 1rVH156qu1djPVFGoKaZ29Kw8zEpmh283
9863597a9863597
> 1rVH156qu1djPVFGoKaZ29Kw8zEpmh283
< 3Kw9pkLTLExTd9LZW2qbbNUdZRpUW3JTac
---
> 3Kw9pkLTLExTd9LZW2qbbNUdZSpUW3JTac
< 1Q7NSpgjxDHTTPUkGskTNDioCYw6MQazBG
---
> 1Q7NSpgjyDHTTPUkGskTNDioCYw6MQazBG
< 331xujHAg6AGvKzPwUKZ9AJxukaemCXeRw
8496039c8496038
< 3PLoa4ccMdxyGY6mAEStSu45xwqdRftd1b
> 3PLoa4ccMdxyGY6mAEStSu55xwqdRftd1b
10000000a10000000
> 3B92y4bFFPZvjviNhtLWeBKoYXmHVwr3CD
< 3B92y4bFFPZvjviNhtLWeBKoYXmHVwr3CD
7735278a7735278
> 331xujHAg6AGvKzPwUKZ9AJxukaemCXeRw Let's highlight this one: < 1Q7NSpgjxDHTTPUkGskTNDioCYw6MQazBG
---
> 1Q7NSpgjyDHTTPUkGskTNDioCYw6MQazBG The first one (with x) is correct. I have no idea what causes this. I'm now checking if I can reproduce the exact same data change, or that it's caused by hardware failure. |
|
|
|
Then I've sent a new transaction to a different address but with a higher fee (dynamically calculated), the transaction appears on my bitcoin-qt client, but if I search for its transaction id on blockchain explorers, e.g. blockchain.info, it says that this transaction doesn't exists. I saw a similar case yesterday. After several hours, the new transaction confirmed and the old transaction disappeared from block explorers. I expected this to take longer. |
|
|
|
I'd like to verify the evidence on ChipMixer campaign participants: figmentofmyass122h7dmX8vcdNnWjfbz1eevD8tfcJasBWV This address sends to 17k4EVPznuTQ7q7CujbFFvTqx97ff6CZZN which sends to 1Bp5t2AzEGkNSsFsAgCNn9zMy9QGsxB6Pu. squatterNo direct post available, and I don't have it in my own archives either. Address 1ugj76pwcXq2YmPVwxRccZmWrQmEsb2zp is quoted by user notaek, in a post last edited February 09, 2018. This address sends to 1BxSjuLa5GAtMdeiyiQ6P1yBKp2mKnMmf4 which sends to 1Bp5t2AzEGkNSsFsAgCNn9zMy9QGsxB6Pu. exstasieNo direct post available, but address 19wxJJobJ77deczvzoCpLGXDqb7FjcELCi is quoted by DarkStar_ so I have no doubt there. This address sends to 1Mp7gexEEbxzZKS5QUpv2FHwbXJpFWEDem which sends to 1Bp5t2AzEGkNSsFsAgCNn9zMy9QGsxB6Pu. Just checking these connections was a lot of work already. I'm impressed you found all this! Advertising a mixer and getting caught on blockchain evidence is quite ironic. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
