those are delicate ecosystems, important for migratory avian and other species
no
don't do that
Screw 'em, they should have evolved more. Bulldoze it and install tiki bars with lasers. |
|
|
|
Edit: BTW, is there any specific reason why GBP comes second and EUR third?
Because Britannia rules the waves. |
|
|
|
|
While I disagree with a number of TERA's positions, I do think a large retracement is on the cards in the not-so-distant future. Bitcoin has exhibited a fractally repeating pattern, do we bet against another iteration? For now though, I'll keep quiet: higher highs are the only thing that will happen.
|
|
|
|
Updated:
Is that 2000 figure accounting for inflation? That's a good point, and it probably isn't. There's been around 43% inflation since, so it makes a big difference. To calculate it out precisely, it requires the divisor for the index back at the peak in 2000. I would've thought this would be widely available, but seemingly not? |
|
|
|
Updated:  Thanks for that Yefi...... fellow party poop  I was going to say something, but I did not want to be the first party poop who has actually been paying attention.... lol, party pooping is my speciality. |
|
|
|
Thanks proudhon - you can send the btc to the address in my sig.  Ahem, you know somebody else claimed the prize, right? This is clearly as high as bitcoin will ever get, basically. Maybe just a little bit higher because there are people who haven't realized this is a failed experiment, but that's it. 1 bitcoin will absolutely never be worth $50k. $100k? LOL, no.
What'd I tell you guys? That was the last ATH bitcoin will ever see. People are finally waking up to how much of a failure this project is. Here, if bitcoin gets over GDAX ATH of $11,485, I'll give the the first person to quote me here the last of my bitcoin, which is 0.1 BTC. Quoted |
|
|
|
All you have to do is visit https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#24h scroll down and easily see that over half the transactions in memory pool paid a miner fee of 0 - 5 satoshi/byte. Are those legitimate transactions or spam? Most likely latter. I was going to reply to you saying that would be too difficult for him, but he's already proved it. I wonder where he went wrong. Maybe it was the scrolling part |
|
|
|
Goldman Sachs CEO: Something that moves 20% overnight does not look like a currency. It is a vehicle to perpetuate fraud.
To return to the Swiss, the franc appreciated 41% in less than an hour in January 2015. The whole of Switzerland must therefore be a vehicle to perpetrate fraud. Also, an overnight drop of 8% in the pound sterling, which is the fourth largest currency, is A-OK apparently. |
|
|
|
What does the Swiss national bank have to do with the Swedish Nobel prize?
The fuck, I just got pwned. Yeah, Swedes and Swiss, there may be a minor geographical separation |
|
|
|
Stiglitz gives the Noble price such a bad name. Not only because of these dinosaur remarks on Bitcoin but als his quest to abolish cash. The man sounds like a total aparatsjik.
The *Swedish* National Bank gave the Nobel prize a bad name, I think is the truth. If he weren't a skeleton, poor old Alfred would be turning in his grave. It's a rickroll. Who'd cut off their ball for a bet? |
|
|
|
|
Proudhon is the cutest bear. I just want to squeeze him like a teddy.
|
|
|
|
So that's quite the drop.
There were plenty of sharp 20-30% drops on the way up during the rallies of 2013. When price explodes, it's par for the course. Not again? We need to set up a site like bitcoin obituaries for how many times China has banned Bitcoin. |
|
|
|
Yeah... I hate to also be that guy, but it does feel almost exactly the same:
Nov 2013: Bitcoin dips from 800 to 600, then takes off. (First selloff) Check
Nov 2017: Bitcoin dips from 8000 to 6000, then takes off. (First selloff) Check
Nov 2013: Bitcoin breaks 1000. Euphoria ensues. Check
Nov 2017: Bitcoin breaks 10000. Euphoria ensues. Check
Nov 2013: Bitcoin starts jumping 8-10% per day. Check
Nov 2017: Bitcoin starts jumping 8-10% per day. Check
Dec 2013: Bitcoin hits 1150, then majorly crashes. Major FUD bad news that no one anticipated comes out of left field. Check
Dec 2017:  ??
Well if history repeats, it's not like anyone didn't know... 
Crossing my fingers that this time it really is different. Feels more like March/April 2013: the blossoming of spring after a long, enduring winter. Looking behind ourselves for the path forward is sure to wrong-foot us eventually, however. |
|
|
|
This is exactly what I was expecting to happen right before the whole thing unwinds and crashes to zero. The signals are all there. Get out while you still can.
epic Total epicness. We can expect a massive rally now - Proudhon confirmed. |
|
|
|
|
The great barrier has fallen. Our armies will pour into the lands of five-figures, and strike fear into the hearts of our foes.
|
|
|
|
I agree. Most people are not thinking 30 years ahead. Anyone who completely sells their holdings is showing a lack of imagination.
The number one rule of Bitcoin is that you never sell all your bitcoin. I'll be damned if I'm staring at $1M/BTC and don't hold any. |
|
|
|
Coins without blockchains that even work in the slightest have pumped in the past. Fibrecoin on Poloniex is an example.
The price is high already for a shitcoin really. I'm thinking the chart will look more like Byteball's - huge price to begin with due to limited knowledge and hassle of claiming coins, then a huge dump. Could be wrong, but that's my gamble. |
|
|
|
Not the best time to sell, I should think.
I dunno, I dumped it. Dev team can't even secure their Github. Perhaps with everyone waiting for a pump, there simply won't be one this time? |
|
|
|
Chainalysis's high-end estimate was around 3.8M lost, assuming that Satoshi's 1M are also gone. As they haven't revealed their methodology, their estimate is an argument from authority. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
