Bitcoin Forum
June 16, 2024, 05:23:42 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 ... 199 »
1281  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Would it be ironic if the US Treasury was the secret bidder on the auction? on: March 11, 2015, 11:29:33 PM
Would it be ironic if the US Treasury was the secret bidder on the FBI auction of the seized Silk Road coins?
No, because that's not what irony means.
1282  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Three Unnamed Bidders Win Latest US Marshals Bitcoin Auction on: March 11, 2015, 11:27:09 PM
We can't know the price of the bid unless they publicly say it
Can we find out how much the gubbermit made, so thy don't launder the money?
Fiat has no transparency,  unless you're an unconstitutional rogue government spying agency full of treasonous sons of whores.
1283  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Will capitalism last forever? on: March 11, 2015, 11:21:09 PM
Capitalism can't last forever.Social systems are mortal.Like the human beings who compose them, they are born, mature, decline, and eventually die.The history of capitalist society shows it is no exception. It too has moved from birth through maturity to decline, and is now approaching death.

It might have it's ups and downs but I think it will always rebound eventually. What system could possibly replace capitalism if it did indeed die like you propose?
Something as yet unimagined.

Outright slavery, human sacrifice, or other barbaric practices are unfathomable to civilized people today. The past is usually bizarre from present perspective, as is the future.  The future will change us even as we cling desperately to the ways of the past. This is inevitable.

The ways of modern people will seem downright barbaric to our ultra-empathic great grandchildren.
1284  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Net neutrality just went through, opinions? on: March 11, 2015, 11:13:25 PM
Basically. If a website like Netflix wanted their website to load at a decent speed or be available at all they would potentially have to pay the ISP's to let their websites work through that ISP's services. Because of this vote, that is illegal now.
That's correct. Net neutrality is a great thing,  this was a huge victory for the free flow of information,  and a major loss for the greedy Internet Service Parasites that sought to profit from throttling some information while favoring those who bribe tbem.

Net Neutrality Is a HORRIBLE thing. I would rather have the ISP controlling everything (it is rightfully theirs to control, like the gatekeepers at alexandria library), that the stupid government. Plus, this is paving the way to internet taxes, etc.
No private company has the right to monopolize an industry the way Time Warner, Verizon,  and Comcast have done in the USA. And nothing as important as the internet should be left in the hands of corporations.

Ignoramus.
1285  Other / Politics & Society / Re: "Geopolitical Situation Most Dangerous Since WWII" on: March 11, 2015, 04:05:00 AM
Holy shit balls that tank selfie is beyond the pale. You just know that man would piss himself with fear if he ever found himself on a real battlefield.
1286  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Reddit’s science forum banned climate deniers. on: March 11, 2015, 04:01:23 AM
Climate destruction deniers are and aways have been the paid shills of the fossil fuel industry

You got me dead to rights. Exxon mobil is paying me 7 dollars for this comment alone.
To clarify,  I was referring to the handful of scientists who sold their integrity to the fossil fuel industry. Not rando internet dipshits. No one cares what we think. Never forget that arguing with the willfully ignorant is a fruitless exercise. If they wanted to know the truth they need only Google.

The rest of the world is content with the overwhelming consensus of climatologists.

You realize everything you wrote apply to you too? I understand you believe exxon and shell are home monsters under your bed, keeping people knowing the truth about AGW. You can't believe the global warming scheme is breeding as much power and money, if not more. Why not? Because the cause is just, even if the science is not settled?

That is not a logical or scientific way of arguing against "deniers". Unless, of course you believe in fairy tales and dragons and magic hammers.
I believe in scientific method. I believe in climatology. I believe in evidence. What do you believe in? Fox fucking news? Sweet mercy of Satan, save me from these people.

1287  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Reddit’s science forum banned climate deniers. on: March 11, 2015, 03:11:44 AM
Climate destruction deniers are and aways have been the paid shills of the fossil fuel industry

You got me dead to rights. Exxon mobil is paying me 7 dollars for this comment alone.
To clarify,  I was referring to the handful of scientists who sold their integrity to the fossil fuel industry. Not rando internet dipshits. No one cares what we think.

Note for readers: Arguing with the willfully ignorant is a fruitless exercise. If they wanted to know the truth they need only Google. The evidence paints a very clear picture, human beings are undeniably warming this planet. But these fuckwits are not interested in the truth, just anti-intellectual conspiracies that demonize the scientific community as profit-seekers while worshipping the fossil fuel industry.

The rest of the world is content with the overwhelming consensus of climatologists.
1288  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Net neutrality just went through, opinions? on: March 11, 2015, 02:17:51 AM
Aww, the internet hurt the little conservatard's feelings so he had to ignore me. What a precious delicate little flower that corporate bootlicker is. The reason I'm a dick to people like that is because there's just no excuse for willful ignorance for anyone with Internet access. We have at our fingertips the greatest compendium of knowledge ever assembled. A thousand thousand library of Alexandrias, and we don't have to sift through the database manually like in the days of yore.

There is no excuse. It's shameful to be ignorant about any topic you're interested in. It's doubly shameful to engage in debate about a topic without first taking five damn minutes to learn the truth of the matter.

Zero tolerance for willful ignorance. Shame the fuckers.
1289  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Net neutrality just went through, opinions? on: March 11, 2015, 01:52:54 AM
Only halfwit redneck muricans think libertarian means right-wing corporate bootlicker. For the rest of the world, the word refers to folks on the left of the political spectrum. You sad, clueless clown.

It'd be the ISP's you'd have to bribe, not "big gubmint". And the effect would be immediately noticeable,  so you'd end up getting yourself and your ISP in big trouble. Why don't you retreat to your mountain bunker and spare the internet your ignorance. No one likes listening to idiots parroting fox news neo-fascist corporate talking points.
1290  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Net neutrality just went through, opinions? on: March 11, 2015, 01:24:27 AM
So I should have to bribe the government to respect my right to make contracts with all my customers that specify they are to use separate dedicated lines for high bandwidth uses and not interfere with other customers who contracted to receive specific speeds for their non-high bandwidth uses?
Bandwidth is a zero sum game. You can't give extra to one party without reducing the speed of (an) other party/ies. No government or private organization will have the power to do that for you now. That's the whole point of net neutrality. Fucks sake, you conservatives are thicker than molasses When it comes to the dreaded government bogeyman.
1291  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Will capitalism last forever? on: March 11, 2015, 12:37:28 AM
Only change is forever. Everything else blinks into and out of existence in a fraction of a cosmic second. All of human history is a mere heartbeat to the universe. Our rise to dominance on this planet and eventual extinction will go unnoticed as the briefest,  tiniest flicker of light in the vast cosmic darkness.

To say nothing of an already dying, unscientific primate hhierarchy justification system that has only existed for a few hundred years.

In my opinion as an usually smart primate, capitalism has ~20-30 years left.
1292  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: How to explain Bitcoin to Chicks on: March 10, 2015, 04:10:20 PM
Step 0: Stop calling women chicks. It's sexist.
1293  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Why PayPal and Bitcoin should partner up. on: March 10, 2015, 04:06:19 PM
Bitcoin doesn't need Paypal.

Paypal needs to adapt and pivot into the bitcoin space of they want to have any hope of being in business ten years from now.
1294  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Reddit’s science forum banned climate deniers. on: March 10, 2015, 03:56:35 PM
I loathe the phrase "climate change". It's a weak euphemism for climate catastrophe that utterly fails to capture the desperate urgency of changing our toxic, abusive relationship with this planet. If only we could glance the suffering our selfishness will reap upon our grandchildren.

Climate destruction deniers are and aways have been the paid shills of the fossil fuel industry,  and the scientific community is right to shun, mock, and discredit them.
1295  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Net neutrality just went through, opinions? on: March 10, 2015, 03:52:31 PM
Basically. If a website like Netflix wanted their website to load at a decent speed or be available at all they would potentially have to pay the ISP's to let their websites work through that ISP's services. Because of this vote, that is illegal now.
That's correct. Net neutrality is a great thing,  this was a huge victory for the free flow of information,  and a major loss for the greedy Internet Service Parasites that sought to profit from throttling some information while favoring those who bribe tbem.
1296  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Article: The East India Company: The original corporate raiders on: March 10, 2015, 02:41:53 PM
I believe the church pre-dates the East India Trading company by several thousand years, I know many religious people here wouldn't regard them as a corporation but when you consider how many non-christian countries they tried to dismantle and take over and the way they did it I'd disagree.

Church isn't a good example. They rarely acted on their own. From the beginning the church used to be involved on the request of the secular authorities. The king or whatever
Wrong. There were no secular authorities back then. Kings ruled by divine right. The comparison to corporations is valid, church-government collusion for profit was the precursor to modern corp-government for profit collusion.
1297  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Is bitcoin a virus to humanity, just another thing to manipulate us. on: March 10, 2015, 02:36:25 PM
Stopped reading at the word alien. Superstition is the end of reason. Show me some credible evidence or  shut the fuck up.
1298  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Where do you stand on Ferguson? on: March 10, 2015, 03:15:18 AM
If you are upset because a white cop shot an unarmed black man, then you are facilitating racism. Simple as that.

The sooner people stop screaming "racist" every time an injustice occurs against their race of choice, the sooner mankind can move past this aspect of our evolution.

TT
Way to demonstrate a total lack of understanding of context here. This shit doesn't happen in a vacuum. Ferguson is a poverty stricken mostly black town with an almost all white police force during the worst economy since the great depression. Ferguson is about the effects of concentrated poverty,  and yes there is a race element at play there.

All that said, I'm upset because an over-armed, under-trained, under-disciplined CIVIL SERVANT killed an unarmed HUMAN BEING.

You should be too.
1299  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Article: The East India Company: The original corporate raiders on: March 10, 2015, 03:04:15 AM
I'm surely a lowlife scum but I'd buy in Smiley. EIC had a vision, a mission and the determination to achieve these goals.
There's almost no limit to what you can accomplish when you're willing and able to throw unthinkable quantities of human suffering at a problem. That's how they built the pyramids when the engineering technology of ancient Egypt would have otherwise made such a feat impossible.
1300  Other / Politics & Society / Re: OBAMA: ‘IMPORTANT’ SECOND AMENDMENT RESPONSIBLE FOR HIGH HOMICIDE RATES on: March 10, 2015, 02:49:28 AM
Attack helis, fighter jets, tanks...


Actually, it's 100% legal to own all of that... You're just not permitted to purchase the armaments to put on them. So if you have $30 million you can go right ahead and buy a F15.
Never said it was illegal, just that civilians dint have these tools. And you'll have a 30 million dollar paper weight with no armaments and very likely no knowledge or training to operate it. There's a word for this: irrelevant.
Pages: « 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 ... 199 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!