|
The sun is at rest with respect to the Earth =/= heliocentrism.
|
|
|
|
Hehehe, 536 pages and still going.  The Sun is observed to travel across the sky from east to west, therefore the burden of proof rests on those that claim it's at rest with respect to the Earth.
Although you are sounding a little tired now. Or was your question directed at members of the The Sun Is At Rest With Respect To Earth Society? Sounds an interesting concept, got a link? |
|
|
|
I paid out a lot. Almost $5k. Say what you will about that
Yeah, without checking with each of your "winners", for the sake of argument I accepted that you did pay out. Seeing as the "script" has been proven not to exist/work, the question was 'Why?' Pro Tip: don't bother to answer that. |
|
|
|
Oh, gawd.. I've told you already, I stopped using the script. xDDDD
And also, my investors are not imaginary. read: nullius, SyGambler, TelevisionLover, so on and so forth, just ask them. Faggot.
What you're telling is mostly lies. nullius and SyGambler have already stated that they don't have any proof of you actually making gambling profit with their money, or any proof of the script. I'll go with Mr. Occam here. Yeah, that's the way the Razor cuts for me too; there was no script. If that is the case, it begs the questions: 1) The nearly half a BTC he/she/etc. paid out below was seed money. What for? 2) What did aTriz do or see, in order for him to vouch it? Name Amount Return Amount ROI
slaman29 0.005 0.007 140%
nullius 0.01 0.02 200%
slaman29 0.1 0.11 110%
slaman29 0.1 0.107 107%
v4d1mm 0.005 0.0058 116%
v4d1mm 0.0475 0.052 109%
SyGambler 0.01 0.014 140%
TelevisionLover 0.01 0.013 130%
TelevisionLover 0.05 0.055 110%
TelevisionLover 0.1 0.109 109%
SyGambler 0.01 0.012 120%
TelevisionLover 0.2 0.22 110%
TelevisionLover 0.2 0.21 105%
TelevisionLover 0.2 0.22 110%
TelevisionLover 0.25 0.275 110%
TelevisionLover 0.25 0.275 110%
live:tonyl6 2.5 2.8 112%
favours 0.8 0.88 110%
Not that it's inconsistent with alia's inconsistency, but I'd have thought that the best way of continuing to bluff this out would have been to push the following story, rather than attempt to argue that math isn't math. The claimed unspecified alteration in house edge would make redundant calcs based on 1%. As for "no strategies will work in gambling" - this does not apply to someone who was intimate with the dev who owns the gambling site, and thus has some insider information.
I'll elaborate further:
The site in question uses an interesting system to rope in users. For each new user, it will let them get a certain amount of profit with ease (the house edge is significantly lower), and once this quota is hit, they will start losing. This way, people feel like the game is not rigged and even upon losing it all, they'll keep trying to put in more money. What I do is, I play until the quota is almost hit, and then I cash out. Although his/her/etc. later claims that tweaking made the "script" work on more than just one site are yet another inconsistency. |
|
|
|
I gambled with Alia. She did not tell me the name of the site, and I didn’t ask.... .....it sounds like you gave her 0.01 and she gave you back 0.02 without you having the slightest proof that any "gambling" actually took place.You told me that you initially lost all my money. You said you covered it with your own funds, then recovered, won, and split the profit with me. Just to tidy up something for me please nullius, is the bolded bit essentially what happened, (with the later detail)? I.e. you never actually saw any wagers being placed or a real time P/L indicator, she simply told you the end result? |
|
|
|
You appear to have two main problems. The major one is your post quality, if Google translate is accurate your Arabic posts are virtually spam anyway. But also, a quick look at how Arabic sub forum merits are being distributed is discouraging, this post got 3 merits.... بالتوفيق ديما
|
|
|
|
Last week, I began drafting for this thread a suitable “diatribe” ....
Oh Merit Magnate, please think again, consider self recusal. Will there be no thread free of illumination from your searchlight intellect? Think of this thread as some Austrian's box, and the answer to its question as a cat. Don't break down. Save us from the gas. |
|
|
|
i dont want to loose my bounty campaign because some guy is just in a bad mood because his girlfriend left him lol,
Insult the only one that can remove the negative trust... smart.  Your right probably wrong idea, but im upset, he is abusing his rank, and power, and he insulted me even after a sincere apology to this forum and him... Stop whining/digging and lock this useless thread. |
|
|
|
This is Recyclix, shown to be a Ponzi scheme here. |
|
|
|
Less evolved primates do tend to resent the system, as they keep randomly hitting those keys with letters on them that they don't understand, and then they all sit around the dinner table as a family of 28, wondering why they're not ranking up.
Classy. |
|
|
|
ObscureBean Skyped me and verified me once again. he verified me. How is that "verified" in any way? This what "verify" means on this planet.  |
|
|
|
The perfect Bitcoin Fantasy Thread, finished off to perfection by the appearance of the Sheikh from Dubai.
Stopped reading this nonsense at 500 bitcoin.
i have to agree, anyone with 500 bitcoins to sell a week, thats 500k a week in income, 2million in income a month. i wonder what irs gonna be doing next Shit math for a Legend mate, out by a factor of 10. I hear you're active on Skype, racking up debts to cam girls? |
|
|
|
Just yesterday, the Legendary member ObscureBean Skyped me and verified me once again.
Would that be the ObscureBean account that has been inactive for six months? How much did it cost you? How is that "verified" in any way? Although, that is news to me. I did not know that. Guess the dude was fake since he keeps promising to pay me but has paid me zero so far.
But the account sent you positive trust  |
|
|
|
Just yesterday, the Legendary member ObscureBean Skyped me and verified me once again.
Would that be the ObscureBean account that has been inactive for six months? How much did it cost you? |
|
|
|
I believe Craig Steven Wright is the person who invented nullius.
I was flown to London to meet Dr. Wright a couple of weeks ago, after an initial email conversation convinced me that there was a very good chance he was the same person I’d communicated with on BCT. After spending time with him I am convinced beyond a reasonable doubt: Craig Wright is nullius.
Part of that time was spent on a careful cryptographic verification of messages signed with keys that only nullius should possess. But even before I witnessed the keys signed and then verified on a clean computer that could not have been tampered with, I was reasonably certain I was sitting next to a genius.
During our meeting, I saw the brilliant, opinionated, focused, generous – and privacy-seeking – person that matches the nullius I worked with six years ago. And he cleared up a lot of mysteries, including why he disappeared when he did and what he’s been busy with since 2011. But I’m going to respect Dr. Wright’s privacy, and let him decide how much of that story he shares with the world.
We love to create heroes – but also seem to love hating them if they don’t live up to some unattainable ideal. It would be better if nullius was the codename for an NSA project, or an artificial intelligence sent from the future to advance our primitive money. He is not, he is an imperfect human being just like the rest of us. I hope he manages to mostly ignore the storm that his merit giving will create, and keep doing what he loves– learning and research and innovating.
I am very happy to be able to say I shook his hand and thanked him for giving the world to BitcoinTalk.
Gavin Andresen
|
|
|
|
OMFG! I just had a terrible thought, guys. What if we're being trolled by Craig Wright as nullius?
If that's the case, then Gavin Andresen is alia.. |
|
|
|
|
I suggested to scam detector that he should think about locking his other thread, as and when he believed that the substantive points had been made.
If only other thread starters would do the same.
Out of the last 24 posts, 16 were personal alia/nullius recriminations, and her/his/its other recent responses were just abuse or drivel.
The alia account is effectively dead, just a noisy twitching corpse now.
It was an unpleasant surprise to see someone who appeared to be level headed like aTriz, making the errors of judgement he has made in vouching for a gambling script and pre paying a large signature deal with a newbie, based on a 'contract' apparently scribbled on the back of an envelope.
|
|
|
|
I repeat: you can't fake a Skype call!
You can absolutely pay someone to pretend to be you on a Skype call. Although honestly, I'm not even sure what a Skype call would achieve at the moment. As I said before, you have admitted your online accounts and wallets are frequently used by a known scammer (be that you, your brother, your boyfriend, whoever). Proving that you are a 19 year old girl changes none of that. That's a good point. Ideally my brother would come on to clarify it, I'll leave that to him. As far as I can see, there have been accusations leveled against him but he has not scammed anyone that I can see. This is just cringeworthy now. Is there even a brother? Does it make any difference? A one month old account with red trust from Theymos, why is it worth all this verbiage? I could leave this thread and not come back. Give it a try. |
|
|
|
Whether my brother wants to come on and defend any of this is up to him. On the other hand, my offer to verify myself is still entirely up for grabs. It seems like nobody is willing to give me the chance to prove myself.
Has the penny not dropped? You're history. |
|
|
|
Do you get your money back if she gets negative trust?
Nope  I don't that was in the contract. Technically the contract means I have to buy her sig for 3 years, correct? I tried to find your post about it, but couldn't. It was "in the contract" specifically that red trust wouldn't affect payments?? Wow. Were you pissed up when you agreed to that? I wouldn't pay the lying con artist a sat; what's she/he/it going to do, sue you? But now you've accepted that the account is wrecked, you'll want to do something about this rather bizarre sight, guilt by association and all that..  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
