If what you mean is profit that is only obtained from bitcoin, then my answer is no. But if what you mean is getting profit from bitcoin world (anything related to bitcoin and crypto world), then my answer is yes. More precisely earn income from bounty campaign results.

Now there are more and more foods at low prices such as menus that are served 1 package containing rice, chicken and fresh drinks at a price of $ 0.5. But have you ever thought that the food served is hygienic? Isn't it better for us to cook ourselves at home with clean ingredients and clean cooking utensils too? Cut the budget by buying 1 sack of rice, then buying fresh vegetables or fish that we can cook ourselves.

It's true that he didn't mention self-improvement there, but he indirectly took what I said before to be entirely in the context of greed. Indeed from one point of view, it can be said to be greedy because they want to earn more, more and more money. Even though my point is how we learn to develop rather than learn to survive. As in the philosophy of football "the best defense strategy is to all out attack the enemy" and we can apply that in our lives as motivation.

There is nothing wrong with us also learning how to survive because someone's economic situation and circumstances are different, especially in different country.

Please be able to understand the difference between self-improvement and greed, because it is very clearly different. In today's modern economic era, we are required to always be able to develop ourselves and that is not something wrong. Getting a bigger income from the results of self-development is a fair result.

And developing a business or building a profession that is our passion, in my opinion, is not greed, but self-development. What is called greed is if we as clothing sellers see that on front side us there are bakers whose sales are good, in the end we join in selling bread with the aim of competing with the bakers on front side us.

That's what I mean, not how we manage money with the same income throughout our lives. But how do we change this income to get opportunities whether we can get bigger or at the risk we can lose it. There are many ways to change that, for example by doing business, trading, become a seller or going to the metropolis for a job with a higher salary than before.

It all comes back to our respective choices. Do you stay with this situation or take the risk of getting out into a wider area with a bigger or even smaller result?
The benchmark of happiness is not about how much money or assets we have, but how we use it with gratitude.

In economics, we really have to be independent since we graduated from school, whether it's school or college education. we are forced to have to work and save in preparation for our mature future, especially at the age of 25-27. Not a few also start their own business with the hope of success at the age of 30-40.

But that's all just theory, in practice in the real world it sometimes doesn't work out like that because sometimes there are boy who are already independent at the age of 20 or even 17 years, sometimes there are also those who are late by the age of 30 and are only independent. And our parents also don't force us to do it all, even though we are already successful, our parents will still want to give us because it is instinct.

It is now 2023 but the lingering effects of the ukraine-russia war are still being felt. What was most felt from the impact of the war was the rising fuel and in the end it also affected other basic commodities. Maybe everyone already knows that because they feel the impact, but what makes me confused is why until now the price hasn't come down?

There has been no official survey from journalists or media compatible with that. However, from the news that appears in various media, money the real root of all evil, such as corruption, theft, tax evasion, money laundering, bribery, hoarding of goods in order to obtain more profit, still occur frequently and can be categorized as money the real root of all evil or by goal is to earn more money.

No matter how much savings we have, eventually it will be used. But the intent of this topic may not be used to meet needs and if you read the tweet, it emphasizes more on how we manage our savings to become a business, or passive income which makes us get money that is even much bigger than the savings that we start before. but most people are afraid to use it, so that person likens "a person dies in the desert while carrying many bottles full of water".

But I always have something called untouchable saving, which means it's really special savings for emergencies. and we all have to remember that having untouchable savings is especially important for unpredictable emergencies.

Come to think of it, I prefer commissions because we can get a bigger income if our work succeeds in exceeding the target set by the company. Whereas if the salary, wheather the job target is fast or not, it doesn't make us paid more but can be cut from manager if our work is late.

Passive income is indeed everyone's goal to enjoy the results of hard work at a young age, then the business runs smoothly without the need to work in it. That's what you mean? Yes, it will be very nice when a writer, songwriter, artwork, get royalties for their hard work even though it has been going on for years later.

Then our task now is to find out what can be used as passive income for at least the next 10 years? considering that almost all business sectors are full of new or old platforms.

I started to think the business of developing organic farming on a large scale could be a good opportunity.

Yes, a side job can be very helpful if what we do doesn't interfere with our main job in terms of time, energy, and our head. For office staff, maybe they can still save some energy to do other work later. But if we talk about all the jobs (including heavy work such as carpentry, mechanics, construction), it will be very hard if you have worked all day and have to take care of other things.

For 1 : 1000 chances, yes.
For example, people who have invested in Bitcoin from a long time ago and finally sold it when the market grew big in the 2018 period. Then several people who were selected as developers of a coin which is currently in circulation and in high demand, can also be said to earn income from crypto.

But on a broader scale, for example people who suddenly come and want to try their luck in trading, investing, or even bounties/airdrops, I think it's too risky to only depend on crypto as a goal of financial freedom.

An explanation of how staying thriving in a low-income area is a way to survive. If it continues like that then it will be difficult for us to develop. The right way to grow is to take the risk to get out to a place with high mobility so that it can cover all aspects of the business that can be used as opportunities.

From an employee's point of view, a fixed monthly salary would be more convenient. If the salary is weekly, we might think about using the money faster that week and it doesn't feel like in a month we have almost no savings. And if the salary is a presentation of the work we do, it's like forcing us to work beyond the company's targets.

If you have a mature plan to open a business or use the savings to explore your potential, I think it's a good thing to take risks because you are still a student, not yet to be a husband and father.

There's nothing wrong with saving, especially if you think about an emergency that is not predicted. But managing that money so that it continues to grow is also very important.

Not necessarily stable
For example those of us who already have a monthly salary choose to do business outside of work, for example become a seller or whatever that is. Because we still have a main job, in the end we only think of the business as a sideline and don't focus full time there. It will actually lead to poor financial management of us. Let's say we spend money to start, but because we are still focused on our main job, our business ends up being abandoned.

But if the side job in question is trading or investing, we may still have plenty of time for that but the risk of loss is also haunting.

A very dark topic, but this is indeed the reality that is happening in underdeveloped countries and if you have read articles or seen on YouTube, one of them is Burundi. Small country with a high poverty rate.

When we talk about climate change and extreme weather, we cannot avoid it. But for some developed countries there must be a solution for that, for example gardening with the help of technology that can manipulate the weather.

But the problem is, how can these poor countries find solutions for themselves? I think the most appropriate step is for developed countries or rich countries to provide assistance to poor countries. Because poor countries have almost no way to solve their hunger problem because the economic circulation there is very limited, the exchange rate is low, and the wages of workers are also low.