Bitcoin Forum
June 29, 2024, 01:35:09 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 ... 221 »
141  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: running bitcoin from the command line on: August 23, 2016, 06:16:08 PM
You have to have two terminals.

The first one you run bitcoind. It should do nothing. You should not see anything, it should just look like it hangs. Don't worry, nothing is wrong, that is what is supposed to happen. If there is any output, that is usually a problem.

The second terminal you use bitcoin-cli to interact with the bitcoind you started in the other terminal. This one is where you do all of your commands.

You should be able to use the same terminal.  Just kick off bitcoind so that it will run in the background and your shell will give you the prompt back.  Ie, run:

Code:
$ bitcoind &

Instead of just

Code:
$ bitcoind
142  Other / Meta / Re: Marketplace trust on: August 23, 2016, 05:55:18 PM
I hjave been looking for about 2 hours for the answer to this question but can not find it.  I see my trust as green but when I was showing a buddy how to set up an account on the forum the other day, I showed him me and I was seen as black to him.  Please explain how that works.  I really do not care, I am just curious.  Thank you in advance.

Thats because the way you did setup your trustlist.

More specifically, you have someone on your trust list who gave you positive feedback and that person is not on your buddy's list.  Only feedback from people on your list shows up by "default" and influences the color you see in the marketplace sections.
143  Economy / Gambling / Re: Bitcoin poker overview on: August 22, 2016, 06:32:34 PM
It is good to have a thread where players can discuss ongoing action at the various sites. An alternative to the site-dedicated threads that don't really welcome comparisons to and discussion of other sites.

I float around quite a bit among the different btc poker sites. Currently I play cash at the new Bovada entity 'Ignition Poker,' that recently began accepting bitcoin deposits and withdrawals. I also play larger FR at Nitrogen and Fortunejack. Sometimes I will play cash at Nitrogen. At some point I'd like to hit the FJ cash tables again ... there is only so much time in the day. Anyway, I'll play cash at all three of these sites. Still like to check into SWC from time to time ... but my visits are irregular.

For sure, if you want to start a new thread and manage it, I'll close this one and link to your new thread.  I just don't have enough time or info to properly manage such a thread myself.
144  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Wallet for Android / Re: Is Bitcoin Wallet for Android Hierarchical Deterministic? on: August 18, 2016, 05:23:36 PM
You can just use the WalletTool program from the bitcoinj source code with a wallet file.

Andreas told me he wants to be careful about exposing the seed words because it can break in various edge cases e.g. if you have an old wallet that has pre-HD keys in it and then you think all you need are the post-HD seed words. So it will take some effort and testing to get it fully right.

I know Mike is out of the scene now, but I need some help with this.  I have pulled my keys from version of the android wallet which was available in Nov 2013.  The keys when backed up came from a newer version of the android wallet in Nov 2014 and I need to get the private key for my original address that was reused a bunch before this wallet went to HD.  I have the seed which says it had a birthday on Nov 14, 2013, but after putting the seed into an HD wallet generator like the one mentioned above  (https://dcpos.github.io/bip39/) I cannot generate the same original address/key pair.  Does anyone have some clues to figure out how to get the private key for the original address?

Three keys came out in a format like this:

Keys:
addr:xxxxxx...
hash160:xxxxxx...
ECKey{pub=xxxxxx...,
priv=xxxxxx...
creationTimeSeconds=xxxxxx, isEncrypted=false, isPubKeyOnly=false}


And then this once:

Seed as words: xxxx xxxx xxxx ...
Seed as hex: xxxxxx...
Seed Birthday : xxxxxx.
Key to watch: xxxxxx...
addr: xxxxxx...
hash160:xxxxxx...



And then a few more like this:

DeterministicKey{pub=xxxxxx...,
priv=xxxxxx..., isEncrypted=false, isPubKeyOnly=true}
addr:xxxxxx...



I've also tried to used the ECKeys to generate WIF format private keys, but they do not produce the original address.

Thanks in advance!

Moreover the very first address on this decrypted list is the address I need, but like I said I could not get the ECKeys to produce the right WIF format.

I'm not sure if I understand correctly.  Is it the case that you have the public/private key pair for the addy you want?  And that your issue is just converting the format to WIF?  If so, it's not that hard, I can probably help you.  What format are the keys in now (hex, binary, decimal)?

I have a python script which takes a private key as input and produces the bitcoin addresses and WIF for the priv keys for that private key.

Yes, I have the public and private key pair written as "ECKey{pub=[key here], priv=[key here]}.  It appears to be hexadecimal.  This is straight from the instructions of extracting private keys from the Schildbach wallet key file.



We chatted a bit in PM, but it might be helpful to others to put this here.  Given the priv key in hex, you should be able to convert it to all the other formats with the 'ku'  program which is part of pycoin:

https://github.com/richardkiss/pycoin

I went through the same process you did some time ago, exporting a particular address from a wallet backup and needing the WIF in order to use it elsewhere.
145  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Wallet for Android / Re: what format the andoird BTC app sends wallets in? on: August 17, 2016, 04:55:41 PM

It's not that complex. Pasting the wallet.dat format is more of a pain. You're making the problem more complex by trying to import it to a program taking a different format. Just parse it using protobuf, or bitcoinj's protobuf wallet parser.

If you don't write java, you might not know how to "just parse it with protobuf".  Here's the actual steps I used to extract private keys from a Schildbach wallet export:

1) decrypt the file using openssl aes-256 (as described in the linked stackoverflow)
2) dump the private keys using bitcoinj's wallet tool.  This is not actually described in the document, but you can do it like this:
$ ./wallet-tool dump --dump-privkeys WALLETFILE
3) convert the privatekeys to WIF, I used the "ku" program for this from the pycoin repo: https://github.com/richardkiss/pycoin
4) import your WIF into bitcoind

Can you help me convert my ECKeys into WIF so I can move some Maidsafe coins?  I've tried a bunch of stuff (I'm not super technical) without any luck.  See my post here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=889287.new#new

Thanks!

I replied in that thread.  In the future, if you're just trying to get my attention, maybe PM instead of bumping a thread.
146  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Wallet for Android / Re: Is Bitcoin Wallet for Android Hierarchical Deterministic? on: August 17, 2016, 04:53:49 PM
You can just use the WalletTool program from the bitcoinj source code with a wallet file.

Andreas told me he wants to be careful about exposing the seed words because it can break in various edge cases e.g. if you have an old wallet that has pre-HD keys in it and then you think all you need are the post-HD seed words. So it will take some effort and testing to get it fully right.

I know Mike is out of the scene now, but I need some help with this.  I have pulled my keys from version of the android wallet which was available in Nov 2013.  The keys when backed up came from a newer version of the android wallet in Nov 2014 and I need to get the private key for my original address that was reused a bunch before this wallet went to HD.  I have the seed which says it had a birthday on Nov 14, 2013, but after putting the seed into an HD wallet generator like the one mentioned above  (https://dcpos.github.io/bip39/) I cannot generate the same original address/key pair.  Does anyone have some clues to figure out how to get the private key for the original address?

Three keys came out in a format like this:

Keys:
addr:xxxxxx...
hash160:xxxxxx...
ECKey{pub=xxxxxx...,
priv=xxxxxx...
creationTimeSeconds=xxxxxx, isEncrypted=false, isPubKeyOnly=false}


And then this once:

Seed as words: xxxx xxxx xxxx ...
Seed as hex: xxxxxx...
Seed Birthday : xxxxxx.
Key to watch: xxxxxx...
addr: xxxxxx...
hash160:xxxxxx...



And then a few more like this:

DeterministicKey{pub=xxxxxx...,
priv=xxxxxx..., isEncrypted=false, isPubKeyOnly=true}
addr:xxxxxx...



I've also tried to used the ECKeys to generate WIF format private keys, but they do not produce the original address.

Thanks in advance!

Moreover the very first address on this decrypted list is the address I need, but like I said I could not get the ECKeys to produce the right WIF format.

I'm not sure if I understand correctly.  Is it the case that you have the public/private key pair for the addy you want?  And that your issue is just converting the format to WIF?  If so, it's not that hard, I can probably help you.  What format are the keys in now (hex, binary, decimal)?

I have a python script which takes a private key as input and produces the bitcoin addresses and WIF for the priv keys for that private key.
147  Economy / Gambling / Re: Bitcoin poker overview on: August 16, 2016, 05:57:39 PM
Nice idea, this thread, but it looks like it died~

Yah, I didn't have time to keep up with it.  And, since I only have GNU/Linux and basically there's not really any love for me, I have a hard time testing the sites that do exist.  I'd happily hand this thread over to someone more motivated if such a person comes along.
148  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMs, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Working-Stake, a.k.a. "Clamcoin" on: August 12, 2016, 05:28:11 PM
It's just crazy when people think bitcoin has value when in fact there is no use for it. This value is too high.


It makes sense that if you have no use for it then the price is clearly to high for you.  But the way markets work is that you're not the only one around so ...

Anyway, it seems like if everyone felt like you then you'd be right.  However, this doesn't seem to be the case.
149  Economy / Gambling / Re: BetcoinPoker.com Betcoin.ag-Big Tourneys-BONUS-Freerolls, Ring Games, Real Poker on: August 11, 2016, 09:19:38 PM
I was playing yesterday and noticed a but in the statistics view.  Specifically the win/loss row said "loss" even when I was actually ahead.  What's more, when I won money, the "loss" increased, when I lost money the "loss" increased.  This did not affect my balance, I just noticed that the win/loss statistic seems broken.
150  Other / Meta / Re: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no on: August 11, 2016, 07:48:09 PM
The best part of the discussion is. Both of them are literally getting paid to fight/argue.
LOL

Maybe nearly as good, the OP and Quickseller are the same guy, so he's literally just discussing with himself on most of the first few pages.

Is this true ? Can you point us to something that would support such a conclusion ?

Publically, I can only provide anecdotal evidence.  Basically, you have to look at QS typical attack pattern.  He's done it now to several people on this forum.  When he gets obsessed with someone and decides to go after them, he first attacks with an alt.  He used to use his more higher rank alts "Panthers52" and "ACCTSeller", but these were outed.  So in the last few iterations (his attack threads against dooglus, for example), he uses a newbie account.  You'll see this newbie will open up a thread of accusations, usually with an outlandish tone and little discussion.  Somewhere on the first page, QS will show up with his main account and and more or less take over the thread.  He usually switches back to the newbie alt at various times in the thread in order to keep it bumped.  So, basically, this pair of Lauda attack threads by "gorgon666" fits QS MO perfectly.

Privately, some folks have noticed a certain "signature" that's in the posts of QS and all of his alts.  We haven't found any non QS accounts that have this feature.  We first noticed it when he was attacking me with ACCTSeller, Funfunnyfan, Panthers52 and Quickseller.  The thing is this, because QS still does this kinda stuff, using armies of sockpuppet accounts to try to smear someone, it's more valuable to me to keep this telltale sign a secret, since it keeps proving useful in finding his new attack alts.  If you weren't aware, Newtons1 and gorgon666 seem to be his latest attack accounts.  I'm sure he has others though.
151  Economy / Gambling / Re: SwCpoker.eu | No Banking, Only Bitcoin | Bitcoin Poker 2.0 LIVE NOW! on: August 11, 2016, 07:27:27 PM
[snipped long rehash]
...
What do you think should happen when a site fucks up, doesn't fix it and then ignores players while paying people to call them spamming trolls?

Correction, they're paying for signature space in my posts, no matter what I write.  I'm done helping you derail another thread with your fixation.  This thread is about SWC, hopefully you can get back on topic soon.
152  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: How to get big satoshi instantly on: August 11, 2016, 06:00:28 PM
There is no way to earn many bitcoins instantly, gambling is the only answer to earn bitcoins instantly.

That might require a revision of the definition of "earn".  Lol.

Just want to know is there any way to earn a lot of satoshi, may be 1 million or more daily. Don't post the list of faucets, gambling or trading sites, I am not interested in little earning from faucets or risk of gambling or trading or any kind of doubling or similar sites. If anybody knows the other ways, kindly give me the information.

Get a job that pays in bitcoins. You can get a work-at-home job if you have writing, programming, graphic design, photography, typing, teaching etc. skills

This is pretty much what the OP wants.  Look for actual work that can get paid in bitcoin.  Anything else is just dreaming, IMO.
153  Other / Meta / Re: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no on: August 11, 2016, 05:55:50 PM
The best part of the discussion is. Both of them are literally getting paid to fight/argue.
LOL

Maybe nearly as good, the OP and Quickseller are the same guy, so he's literally just discussing with himself on most of the first few pages.
154  Economy / Gambling / Re: SwCpoker.eu | No Banking, Only Bitcoin | Bitcoin Poker 2.0 LIVE NOW! on: August 11, 2016, 05:26:49 PM
Let's not continue this race towards the bottom.  Bitcoin poker needs to improve, and trolling competitors doesn't help with that.
Promoting Betcoin is only damaging the future of Bitcoin poker.
You're only promoting them because they pay you more than any other site.

Pathetic.

Close but incorrect.  I am promoting them because they're paying for my signature space.  However, I wouldn't sell that space to just anyone.  Fact of the matter is that their software (while certainly not great) is working better than SWC at the moment.  The other fact of the matter is that I'm not convinced by your constant trolling of them.  From what I've seen, they're really just looking better and better the more you are throwing crap at them and they're having to learn how to deal with it. 

Anywhoo, it's my sincere hope that SWC gets a working client for non-windoze users sometime.  But I'm really less hopeful that that will ever happen than I used to be.

damn dude you really need a link to the shit betcoin has done? most recently I remember somehing about a 503 btc jackpot winner being scammed(took a settlement or something) but they tried to pay him out 1 coin and be like stfu.

Don't need a link.  I already read them.  From what I read I saw them as starting off rather incompetent and becoming better and better, meanwhile the trolling of them has gotten louder and louder.  Anyway, I hope you know something about crowd mentalities and mob justice.  I'm working with them based on my own experience with them and what I've read.  Anyway, back on topic, when is SWC going to get a working client?
155  Economy / Gambling / Re: Dragon's Tale - a Massively Multiplayer Online RPG/Casino on: August 10, 2016, 10:40:25 PM
HIya Tel, Hope you're well these days~

Was wondering if DT was still running, apparently it is, mostly.

If there is a DOS attack, can 'supa' be far away?  They must 've let him out of his straight jacket~

Telera might not know you're Scorp.  I don't think supa ever actually had any funds or servers for ddos, he did have plenty of threats tho.
156  Other / Meta / Re: bitcointalk trust system very stupid on: August 10, 2016, 08:46:52 PM
And I think you are stupid for not knowing that none of those feedbacks count unless they are from DT, which you can be only if you are a very trusted member of the community.

And I think you are stupid for not knowing that DT only counts for those who include them on their trust list.

Just kidding, I know you are not stupid.  Nevertheless, it's important to teach people the correct usage of the trust system.  Default trust is on your list be default so that there's no empty trust list on new accounts, users should put who they actually trust on there as soon as they have some experience with the forum.
157  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Is it possible to convert 'hex' to private key? on: August 10, 2016, 08:34:18 PM
Yep.  You are missing the concepts of RIPEMD160, SHA256, and ECDSA, all of which prevent you from working backwards from a bitcoin address to a private key.

Since the OP is looking for education, RIPEMD160, SHA256 are hash functions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hash_function

ECDSA is an algorithm for digital signatures, one aspect of assymetric key cryptography: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public-key_cryptography

Good luck!
158  Economy / Speculation / Re: 666 barrier on: August 10, 2016, 07:41:54 PM
Next thing you know we're going to have bitcoin kabbala people who read the numerology of the market and the hidden messages therein.  Not my cup of tea but I guess it means that this is a thriving and diverse community.
159  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22] on: August 10, 2016, 06:29:46 PM
Is anyone here familiar enough with the code to understand this issue?
https://github.com/samr7/vanitygen/issues/83

(Not like there are enough private key choices), but:

Can anyone confirm if vanitygen is using the entire private key range of
 0x1 to 0xFFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFE BAAE DCE6 AF48 A03B BFD2 5E8C D036 4140
to choose private keys

OR does vanitygen use a smaller range?

Thanks!

I didn't realize that the key range doesn't go from 0x1 to 0xFFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF.
160  Economy / Gambling / Re: SwCpoker.eu | No Banking, Only Bitcoin | Bitcoin Poker 2.0 LIVE NOW! on: August 10, 2016, 06:13:57 PM
Let's not continue this race towards the bottom.  Bitcoin poker needs to improve, and trolling competitors doesn't help with that.
Promoting Betcoin is only damaging the future of Bitcoin poker.
You're only promoting them because they pay you more than any other site.

Pathetic.

Close but incorrect.  I am promoting them because they're paying for my signature space.  However, I wouldn't sell that space to just anyone.  Fact of the matter is that their software (while certainly not great) is working better than SWC at the moment.  The other fact of the matter is that I'm not convinced by your constant trolling of them.  From what I've seen, they're really just looking better and better the more you are throwing crap at them and they're having to learn how to deal with it. 

Anywhoo, it's my sincere hope that SWC gets a working client for non-windoze users sometime.  But I'm really less hopeful that that will ever happen than I used to be.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 ... 221 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!