Bitcoin Forum
May 06, 2024, 04:28:09 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 [52] 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 ... 221 »
1021  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: ===►Maidak scammed me 400$ BTC,this time is for sure===► on: July 26, 2015, 03:10:54 AM
I'm rather uncomfortably on the fence on this whole thing after reviewing this all. So Maidak as it would seem is most definitely having liquidity issues. Even then, with liquidity issues, why wouldn't you just give the BTC back? The BTC was simply nicked and sold. I can't see a plausible reason a sane person would do this if their business was struggling.



When you offer to buy $5k worth of BTC saying you will send funds "over in a few minutes" then disappear for months then you are a scammer, no excuses or bullshit.

He knew he did not have the funds to pay for the goods before initiating the deal.



I have to admit I sorta hate this binary mindset that some people on here exhibit where someone is a scammer and someone else is a non-scammer and as if that describes accurately the world we live in.  In point of fact, there are all kinds of shades of grey and degrees of negative behavior.  Satements like "that guy is a scammer, no excuses or bullshit" seem to ignore the fact that if he pays back eventually, that is clearly better behavior than never paying back at all.  And to talk this way, as if the world is a collection of scammers and non-scammers is in fact a misleading dichotomy which only adds confusion and rankor.  If someone makes a mistake and then tries to clear it up, it's clearly better than not trying to clear it up.  I just have become quite sick and tired of this binary scammer/non-scammer thing, I just don't think it's helpful.

1022  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: ===►Maidak scammed me 400$ BTC,this time is for sure===► on: July 25, 2015, 01:07:22 AM
Maidak,

I, for one, appreciate that you gave replies on-thread to everyone's questions.  In the end, being open about your situation and making a plan to repay and sticking to it are the only options for recovering your reputation.  Anyway, I'm just glad you're still here talking to people and I hope all gets worked out soon.
1023  Economy / Gambling / Re: SwCpoker.eu | No Banking, Only Bitcoin | Bitcoin Poker 2.0 LIVE NOW! on: July 25, 2015, 12:58:01 AM
hmm when I was installing the room something strange happened.
At the end I got 2 windows open from the Bluetooth manager and I could not close them. I had to kill the process. Any idea why this happened? It was related to the poker room, because it happened the 2 times I installed the room (just to see if it was related).
I tried google it, but I got no relations.

That is strange. I have installed on XP, Win7, Win8, Win server 1012 and now win 8.1 and that never happened...It could be you have a Trojan or virus. I would run Scan with Kapersky.

It's a strange behavior for a trojan or virus. Those things are supposed to be silent and not open windows xD
Anyway I will check it out, it's probably just a weird bug.

Not all virii are the same. That's like saying someone couldn't be a robber because he didn't have a gun.

And I've never experienced that issue before, or even heard of it...

I know this software is closed-source and proprietary so we can't expect a github where we can see which commits address which issues.  But I wonder if the devs could open up the issue tracker, or make a public one, so that it'll be easier to tell what issues have been reported, whether a fix has been submitted, etc.
1024  Economy / Gambling / Re: CONCACAF Gold Cup discussion on: July 24, 2015, 01:38:57 AM
I hope Jamaica wins, Mexico received too much help from referees
Jamaica can be happy that they made it to the final of this thing,mexico is a much much better team then them,Jamaica players dont have class they only have speed,but mexico on the other hand is much better Smiley

Is Mexico much better than USA?

Unless you're talking about the result of a particular match, such a question is an opinion question Smiley

Anyway, I don't know if you saw it that USA was eliminated last night by Jamaica.  So it will be Mexico v Jamaica in the final.  If, perhaps, you're wondering whether Mexico is much better than Jamaica, you'll have an answer on Sunday afternoon!
1025  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: I require help. I've either been scammed or put my coins into a dead website. on: July 24, 2015, 01:00:31 AM
Bottom line I put around £300 into the coinmixer website https://coinblender.net/. The problem is that I haven't received the money yet (it's been 5 days now). I've tried contacting them numerous times but the website appears almost dead. Their last tweet was from April 1st giving someone a refund so I don't know what I can do.

I really would appreciate some help about what I can do. Will donate if they help greatly, thank you.

Normally before making an investment online must to do a search with the name of the site. After reading all can be decided what to do. If they don't answer I think that your money is lost. Sorry for this. It will be a lesson for the other investments.

I know some threads are long and hard to read all of them.  But here you're replying to the OP of this 2 month old thread without even looking half-way down the first page:

Final update, thank you everyone. Anyone who commented before with help please leave below your address. http://gyazo.com/72a5c51e2748837e5faa5ca9dcb0f3e9

If you want to bump a thread and give echo-like answers, at least read the first page before answering Roll Eyes
1026  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: ===►Maidak scammed me 400$ BTC,this time is for sure===► on: July 24, 2015, 12:54:46 AM
MMOClub isn't worth anything over $1,000 -- that's probably being very optimistic as it is.
On the other hand, the fact that he's still intending to try to climb back and pay everyone back in encouraging.  I think that's a good sign, on the whole.
1027  Economy / Gambling / Re: Primedice.com | Most Popular & Trusted Bitcoin Game | Huge Community | Free BTC on: July 24, 2015, 12:28:50 AM
I just came to Primedice and I see there's 0.05 BTC waiting right for me! I wonder how much it was worth when I sent it here and forgot about it Grin

It must have been a while ago, I think PD uses a fresh deposit addy for each deposit nowadays.  In any case, 0.05BTC is not dust, so I wish you luck turning it into 0.5BTCSmiley
1028  Economy / Gambling / Re: SwCpoker.eu | No Banking, Only Bitcoin | Bitcoin Poker 2.0 LIVE NOW! on: July 24, 2015, 12:26:51 AM
Hello, is there any way to see the type of tournaments that are offered before installing the software? Like how many freerolls a day, fees, buy-ins, GTD tournaments etc.
I'm starting to try out some poker rooms, but I like to get some info on them before installing software etc, because if they don't have what I like there is no point in installing and creating an account.

Thank you!

I'm sorta in the opposite boat.  I wanna make an account (to claim my old sealswithclubs account) but I don't have the OS to support the client.  In either case, I hope a working browser solution can come out soon.  We're already more than halfway through 2015.  I hope I can get back to bitcoin poker before 2016.
1029  Economy / Gambling / Re: BitcoinPoker.gg - High Stakes. High Rewards - Secure Bitcoin Poker on: July 23, 2015, 07:44:57 PM
Nice Site with good presentation.
I have registered but can't seem to find any freerolls...

you should read the previous comments , freerolls isn't  an option when the site is not making profit
if we want the poker market to be bigger we should all start to put some coins in poker sites and forget about the freerolls
cause most of the poker sites these days seem broke and can't afford to make freerolls
we should generate some rake

it is difficult to survive in btc poker world, cause there are big sites like betcoin, swcpoker, nitrogen, luckyflop and so forth, they have revenue from casinos so they can continue to hold freerolls which can attract players. But pure poker site like this is not profitable, they don't have enough revenue to support freerolls, and can't get daily ring players, that's why they are dead now.

Since when did SWC have a casino?

The issue isn't the fact that it's just a poker site, it deals more with the software being used and a lack of advertising. Major poker sites in the fiat world are spending tens of thousands a month on advertising. You can't just release something on these forums and hope for the best -- it isn't going to be seen by many people. You also need to separate yourself from the competition.

I think you're right that they may have been a bit naieve about what it takes to get something off the ground and running.  It does seem a little like they though that the quality of their site and an open line of communication on the forums would be enough---it's kinda a shame that it's not enough, really.  But in the end, I think you're right that they seem to have underestimated the difficulty and the crucialness of doing successful marketing.

Still, the site quality was good.  It's a shame it didn't take off.
1030  Economy / Gambling / Re: BitcoinPoker.gg - High Stakes. High Rewards - Secure Bitcoin Poker on: July 22, 2015, 07:05:35 PM
Without lowering any respect, this seem to be not feasible anymore. As already been stated by the owner that they are currently on the brink of falling which means that having freerolls will only means giving aways free money that currently they are needing to continue this site's operation, Beside you should note that freerolls only attract freerolls lurker and not the ring games player, to be able to survive the house must gain some revenue from rake
-snip-
Instead of pure freerolls, perhaps its better to them to provide freeroll that requires some rakes to join the freeroll (sorry to say, like on LuckyFlop).

That wont be the solution for this either. Luckyflop has done this thing however the number of ring players there isnt alot either , another example will be turntripspoker that did the same thing however they get the same result ( I mean no intention for cross advertising , just making some example ) .
Without lowering any respect (again) the site has fallen to the brink of almost closure and there is slightly chance for the chance to comeback. Poker site is pretty much hard to advertise ( this is a fact though )

Its crashing also helps explain this listing, which can be a great opportunity if someone truly feels they know how to revive the site.

Actually, I agree completely.  If a new owner comes in with a new plan then perhaps all will win.  The old owner for getting things started and hopefully getting a good price on a sale.  The new owner for hopefully doing a successful follow-up/reboot.  And all of us for having a browser-accessible, cross-platform bitcoin poker site.  It could be great!
1031  Other / Meta / Re: How to contact tomatocage on: July 22, 2015, 06:56:58 PM
I re-added QS to my list because he's good at weeding out the scammers. While I realize that there may be some ruffled feathers because of this, I feel that it's better to prevent people from losing potentially a lot of real money than it is to have a handful of people upset about it. In the end though, your grievance is with QS, not with me.

I'm glad to hear from you.  I guess I'm mainly surprised that you would have taken the time to block pms from me, I don't know if I offended you ever, but I certainly have no grievance with you, as far as I know.   In fact, last time you put QS on your list I recall that you very smoothly brokered peace in this unneccesary situation very effectively.  When I saw you had QS back on your list, I was actually happy to see it was you for figuring that you would have him remove his attacks once you saw he had readded them after you had let him go the first time.  Thus my surprise at PM block.

Anyway, as I said, it seems unfortunate that we're doing this publically rather than privately, but here it is: can you talk to quickseller about how he might be appeased to remove his negative rating upon my account?  I have a long reputation of being helpful and causing no harm and the last 4 months of fighting with him over some false allegations has really taken a toll.  What can I do?  Can you help?

--TSP
1032  Other / Meta / Re: How to contact tomatocage on: July 22, 2015, 05:29:11 PM
I'm not against Quickseller (I've never even interacted with him/her) but I really feel this issue needs resolving.
tspacepilot is not a scammer.

Is there no way you can remove this negative trust Quickseller? For the good of the forum?

Please!

Be a good man & end this dispute.
I don't want to get too involved but this does need resolving once & for all.

Look at 'TradeFortress' trust (The guy at the centre of this dispute)

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=67058

Tspacepilot did withdrew coins he got using "bot chat". See reference link -- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=303613.msg11163154#msg11163154.

Don't mix things saying "TF is a scammer, so no words said by him can be trusted or is true" which is the exact argument of yours and tspacepilot's.

You don't mix things, MZ.  I admited that I was experimenting with bots using TFs approval and help.  I admited that there were a million bots on that site and that I was merely one of many people experiminting and learing about the API. I admitted that it was my first time dealing with asynchronous code and that I made mistakes.  I never found out if or how much I might have gotten from any mistakes because TF was making up numbers (lying!) about how much he wanted repaid.  If he had been more reasonably, it's completely possible that I owe him 10Ksat or something like that.  However, he wouldn't be talked to about it.  He merely said PAY BACK X OR BE BANNED.  And every time he said X it was different.  His first X was like 1.5 bitcoin which I didn't even have at the time (it was waaaaay more than I had withdrawn from his site, ever), then he started picking other numbers but wouldn't say how he was generating them.  Sounds a lot like a scammer himself, right?  Well, what has history shown us here?  And what would you do in such a situation?

Even if he did use a bot in a chat room it's not really a scam is it?
I dunno, I'm out......

I just think this needs resolving. Could Quickseller at least change his trust on TSP to neutral? It's gone on too long.
Shake hands & move on?

Why would quickseller change his negative trust? Using a bot is not a scam or a crime, using a bot to SCAM its a scam, he broke the rules of that specific site to gain profit, its like using a bot to claim from the same faucet without waiting the necessary period of time, thats scamming the site's owner.

You have no idea what happened on that site or what my motivations were and neither does QS. That is the whole issue here, QS has spammed my trust rating with 3 separate acccounts (trust abuse?) over something which is merely an unsubstantiated allegation from a completely discredited source.  You don't know anything about that site or it's rules and neither does he.  He just found something which he thinks is okay to make some kind of smear attack on me with and he's clinging to it for months now as he tries to do as much damage to me as possible.  He goes on and off of default trust because of these vendettas and anger-sessions.  XinXan, if you want to participate in this topic helpfully, try to stick to things you have first hand knowledge of.  When you spread a lie started by TF, echoed by QS, echoed by QS's alt, echoed by you (are you one of QS's alts?) then that's a rumor mill and it has nothing to do with the truth.
1033  Other / Meta / Re: How to contact tomatocage on: July 22, 2015, 01:23:48 AM
What's terrible is this, I keep getting PMs in the last few days from people saying that they're sorry about what I'm going through with QS and this default trust nonsense (again!)---that they appreciate me standing up to QS.  When I say to them, why don't you speak up in public if you've got an issue with him, they just write that there's no way they'd cross him in public because they see what he's doing to me.

If this is true, then can you list the names of these people who have PMed you so that you can prove your claims here?

I won't neg-rep the people you name. Quickseller won't. TC won't. (Okay - I can't guarantee QS and TC won't but I make that claim based on the fact I'm 99% sure they wouldn't do that just for them stating their opinion)

I could.  But I think it's only fair to contact them first, since what they said to me was that they don't want to be associated with criticizing him.  I would only reveal these people if they okayed it explicitly because they clearly told me they didn't want to speak up for fear of negative repurcussions.  I hope you understand.

I think that Tomatocage has already noticed this thread and maybe (like someone said) he doesn't want to conversate with you.

I find it extremely surprising because I don't know tomatocage well at all, I have posted the entirety of my conversations with him above, and as you can see there was nothing but a short and civil exchange.  That he would have added QS to his list and then immediately blocked me seems weird to me.  For a moment I thought that perhaps he was pm blocking everything and simply looking for correspondence with email.  I emailed him at that moment but haven't heard back.  I don't want to start to many rumors, but there was this weird thing where QS was selling a default trust account, it seems too "conspiracy theory"-like to be true, but notice:

1) QS selling default trust account
2) QS making a public threat to "stop me" in a thread three days ago
3) TC readding QS and blocking pms from tspacepilot just after.

I would love it if anyone who does have contact with TC could confirm that he's aware of this situation and perhaps pass along some rationale about why he wouldn't like to discuss it.  I'm just finding his closed-door suspciously different from what happened last time I contacted him.

I can understand why people only say sorry to him, look what he did. Tspacepilot trolled QS . QS search an old thread just to give him red trust yay! So everyone that hate or troll or stand against QS will suffer the same fate. Perhaps QS search all transaction just to mark all your alt, who knows?

Anyway i like QS scam busting, he has identified a lot of scammer but this thing with tspacepilot is off the limit. Neutral rating is better

If I have trolled QS, it was only in defense of my own reputation, which he made threats against and trolled using many accounts across many threads for months.  If I were to document all of the insults and threads in which he or an alt of his has attacked me it would fill more a small book at this point.   He's not only trolled me, but cost me money now on more than one occassion.  We know that when I admit he has cost me money he sits back and laughs, because his ultimate goal here is to cause me pain because for some reason he has chosen that I am some kind of mortal enemy to him.  Belive me, I really just want the harrassment and lies against me to end.  And I am finding it shockingly unbelievable that someone who behaves this way is getting trusted by the real TC.

What can I do here, people?  How long can this kind of randomly stupid abuse be allowed?
1034  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Building Bitcoin-core on CentOS 7 on: July 21, 2015, 03:28:46 PM
Well yes, but I've abandoned the dynamical-linking as I wasn't able to convince the linker to link against the right libs.
Plus I got a lot of the: "no version information available" warnings/errors which forced me to roll back the new libs to the system default ones.

On top, I checked the rpath everytime and the entries within the Makefiles. They were always pointing to the right libs, but for whatever reason the linker either choose the system libs or I got a ton of "version information" errors and stuff ... (probably because of the missing -ldl switch)

On the other hand, when dealing with bitcoin direve space should not be an issue Wink
I don't really care if the application is gonna bit a few meg's bigger because of the statical linking.

So I was expecting that the linker will indeed include everything and don't try something dodgy:
Code:
... Linking the shared library libbitcoinconsensus.la against the static library /opt/ssl/lib/libcrypto.a ... 

Could there be a "-static" missing ?

Could be, I'm not an expert at this stuff although I do have a little bit of experience.  Anyway, it looks like it's just a warning, did you try to run it on the computer you compiled on?  If that's the target machine, it might not matter at all that what you've compiled isn't portable.
1035  Other / Meta / Re: How to contact tomatocage on: July 21, 2015, 02:22:15 PM
That means he added your name specifically as one who is unable to send him messages. He is actively trying to stop you from contacting him, I think that tells you everything you need to know. You should respect that and leave him alone.
Thanks for weighing in, BB.  I guess I'm kinda shocked to find that he's ignoring me given our very short and cordial conversations in the past.  I think there's nothing personal in here, so I want to go ahead and publish it.  This is the entire contact history between me and tomatocage:


Hi Tomatocage,

It appears that you have added Quickseller to your trust list.   I'm writing to you to let you know about a smear attack by quickseller against me which seems to have been motivatived by a personal vendetta.

This occurred in late April and I spoke with Badbear about it.  What's below is a message I sent to him.  I should emphasize, I never heard back from badbear about why he removed QS from his trust list.  But once he had done so, it ended the efficaciousness of QS' attack on me, so I considered the matter closed.  I'm forwarding to you the message that I sent to BadBear because, since you have effectively readded quickseller to default trust, you are now vouching for this kind of behavior.

I'm wondering if you can comment on why you decided to add quickseller to your trust list?  Also, I wonder if you can comment on what you think I should do now that QS's lies are once again causing my account to show up as "WARNING"---effectively helping him to acheive his goal of smearing me off of the forum, which as far as I can tell, was motivated by me calling him out for being a hothead and for telling him that calling people idiots was an unhelpful way to behave.

Best,

TSP

I added him because, for the most part, he seems to be fairly adept at spotting scammers. However, pobody's nerfect, so I'll see if he can revisit your ratings. If nothing else, perhaps he can change them to a more neutral rating.

Regards,
TC

This is what I just sent to him:

Hey man, could you go and revisit tspacepilot's Trust rating that you left him? I don't know all the sordid details, but upon brief inspection, that particular rating seems a bit tenuous at best. I recommend changing it to Neutral. At some point in the past I decided that I, and all the people I have in my Trust list, should leave ratings that are as impartial as possible with a strong lean toward giving the benefit of the doubt to a user (ie. sofia26, but that's another story all together). I've had to have several talks with Vod about it since he seems a bit trigger happy with the negative Trust sometimes, so don't feel singled out Smiley In fact, there's probably a few other examples still floating around out there where I've been a little heavy-handed with the negative Trust for no really good reason as well, so I'm not totally clean when it comes to that.  Anyway, I'd say just flip those negative ratings to Neutral and we'll keep an eye on his activity in the future.

Regards,
TC

And the next morning:

Thanks.  Let's see how he replies.  (Note: I predict a lot of bile, but we'll see.)

Also, FWIW, he's actually left three ratings during his smear attack.  One from ACCTSeller, the alt he used to dig up the dirt with tradefortress, then one from Quickseller, when he "discovered" the dirt dug up by ACCTSeller.  Then another from Quickseller, where he became exaspirated by the fact that I continued to fight his attack.  This happened just a week before he admitted publically that ACCTSeller is his alt.  But since that's on the record now I think it's important to recognized the sock-puppetry he was pulling on me as well.

Anyway, ACCTSeller isn't on default trust, but to properly resolve this, I think both Quickseller ratings need to be dealt with.

Again, I appreciate the intervention and I hope this helps.

--TSP

Ok, problem solved. Please adjust your ratings for him accordingly Smiley

We haven't spoken since.  Isn't it a little weird that he would have preemptively blocked me from asking him about this situation before adding QS back to his list.  It may be that when he added QS, QS told him that he had re-burned tspacepilot and that he wouldn't be changing it this time, I don't know.

Quote
Your remaining options are, work it out with QS, try to get TC removed from DT (no), exclusions from other DT members (unlikely), or deal with it.

I would love to "work it out with QS" but he's really not offering any chance to do so.  (1) He's appearing in this thread above, literally mocking me and teasing with money for someone who can "convince him" but it's clear that's an impossible task; (2) It's not even clear what he wants (except to cost me money and to hurt me)---he has no involvment or knowledge of the original situation he claims to be defending.  If he would come out with some list of things he wants in order to forgive, I'd try to do them.  I dunno, it's hard to imagine paying a bribe to make him leave me alone, but I really cannot figure out how he will be satisfied beyone my death or something.  Curiously, only a few days ago he was issuing threats to me on another thread about "making sure I would be stopped".  Do you guys need me to quote this stuff for you?  Maybe I should before he edits it, but I'm just not as workaholic at trying to bring down quickseller as he is at bringing down me.  I don't have any issues here except this dude attacking me.  Why can't I get anyone to at least justify the attack.
Welcome to chapter 473 of the Quickseller Saga..
I want to really point this out, and I can not realize how people seem to persist:
Your remaining options are, work it out with QS, try to get TC removed from DT (no), exclusions from other DT members (unlikely), or deal with it.
I think that I've only had a negative rating once. I did not whine in this section like many do, but I've kindly asked the person who left it to remove it. Engaging in further, meaningless arguments with QS won't solve your problem. You either need to admit to being wrong and improve yourself, or deal with it. You can always make a new account and start over.

What your negative rating by someone on default trust?  Were you kicked out of a signature ad campaign?  Were you being smeared endlessly for months over something you didn't do?  If so, then I admire your ability to "walk away and start again", but after 3 years on this forum with absolutely no issues, I just can't accept that QS can walk up and start making up lies and take away my income.  That seems completely unjust.  And I think you know it.

What's terrible is this, I keep getting PMs in the last few days from people saying that they're sorry about what I'm going through with QS and this default trust nonsense (again!)---that they appreciate me standing up to QS.  When I say to them, why don't you speak up in public if you've got an issue with him, they just write that there's no way they'd cross him in public because they see what he's doing to me.  That he is online writing hundreds of posts per day and will take them down just like he's taking me down.  Basically, dude is about as big a bully as you can imagine, people are scared to speak up to him.  Worhipper was neg-repped merely for refusing to do business with him.  ndnhc was false accuse and possibly framed by him.  I am still being attacked by him.  He's neg-repped me with up to 3 alts (isn't this against the rules?).  What can we do to end this nonsense?
1036  Other / Meta / Re: How to contact tomatocage on: July 20, 2015, 08:10:34 PM
I think it should be pretty self explanatory regarding your inability to send TC a PM.

In the corporate world, it is generally seen as unprofessional when someone goes straight to someone's boss to complain about them without first trying to work out your dispute.

Since you are a pillar of professionalism, why don't you document your attempt to work out your dispute?

I have already explained my rating to both BadBear and TC. I have not been given any kind of argument from either of them as to how you are not a scammer.


-snip-

Regarding tspacepilot, I think it is clear that he stole from coin chat, I wouldn't have given him the negative rating if I didn't. I sent you the post by blazr spelling out in one post how it is clear that he stole from them. As I told BB, he got on my radar because he was trolling me, for seemingly no reason in this post among others in that thread, and getting trolled like that is, in my experience an indication that the person doing the trolling is a scammer, and in that case that is true. When I did call him out on it, he used intimidation tactics to get me to remove the rating, which in itself is really something that deserves a negative rating. It is generally rare that someone will scam just the one time. Low and behold, he appears to be trying to do something similar with PrimeDice faucet, as he was inquiring how people abuse the faucet here after PD had taken some additional countermeasures to stop themselves from getting scammed by people abusing the faucet. He also advertises that he is willing to code for bitcoin, and I think it is appropriate to warn others about his prior history of scamming, and of his very questionable ethics.

QS
The post referenced by Blazr is here.


If you (or anyone else for that matter) can explain how you are not a scammer based on the evidence (and convince me as such) then I will gladly remove my negative rating against you and send the first person to post an explanation in this thread 0.1BTC, I'll keep this offer open until the sooner of 48 hours from this post or when this thread gets locked. You need to convince me in order to claim the bounty.
If no one is willing to write a single post for .1 btc to explain your innocence within at most 48 hours then it will be appropriate to warn others to avoid interacting with you.

It's a strange distraction from you that you're offering some kind of bounty to "convince" you when we all know that you are unconvincable on this issue.

A major starting point if you actually wanted to work this out would be for you to admit that you have no direct knowledge of what happened at coin chat and that you are siding with a known liar in trying to defame me.  You should admit that you made a mistake when you tried to take discredited lies as evidence against someone.  You have now neg-repped me with three separate accounts, you should own up to this as trust abuse and remove the negative ratings.

With respect to tomatocage, it's not very clear to me why wouldn't hear a PM.  I won't post his private communication with me here unless he give me permission to do so, but the gist of it was that he would try to get you to change your rating to a neutral, given the ancientness of the mud you were trying to dig up and the lack of any firsthand knowledge by of you the situation.  Presumably you did this as he wrote to me the next day saying, "ratings changed to a neutral, please adjust your ratings", which I did.  I have not written to him since then.  I think it's not unexpected that I would write to him seeing that (1) you've changed your feedback back to negative---ie, undoing the peace he brokered (2) he's readded you to his list --- making your false accusations = real damage.  Why he wouldn't answer me is not something I can speculate about.  My guess/hope is that he merely has everyone PM blocked and wants communication through email.  I dunno.

Here's the thing, you started trolling me nearly 4 months ago now, and as far as I can tell, this was only motivated by the fact that you didn't like that I called you out for your hot temper.  At each stage in this saga, I've resisted, told the truth, made public what you were doing to me and at each stage of this saga, your reputation has gone down accordingly.  You keep getting taken back off these trust lists that you so dearly want to be on because you're needlessly fucking with me (and how many others?).  If you could calm down and focus on actual scammers instead of personal vendettas you might actually be able to achieve this power play you keep on trying for.

Me?  I keep wishing the damn thing was over.  How long do I have to be trolled by you and by how many random accounts?  When are you going to finally be either off of the default trust for good or be finally done with your needless  persecution of me.

Finally, your offer is a joke.  You may as well say, I'll give all my btc to the first person who convinces me to leave tspacepilot alone.  We all know you wont be convinced, so the offer isn't real and it provides some sort of strange diversion to the real issue which is this:  who the fuck do you think you are to make a 6 month mission out of trolling someone who is not doing anyone any wrong.  I hang out on the technical discussion pages and help people compile bitcoind for linux.  I write a bit in the gambling pages.  What on earth is your problem that you cannot swallow your pride and move along?
1037  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: ADWARE/Adware.Gen7 Armory on: July 20, 2015, 06:42:39 PM
If you have a compiler, why not go ahead and build from source so that you know there's not weird files being bundled with your binary.  Or, if you don't have a compiler, maybe download one (it's not too hard).

Finally, if there's no way to build from source yourself then you could at least check the binary that it was signed by the armory people's keys.  I assume there's some kind of key-signature way to download their packages (I've never used them myself), but if a bitcoin wallet didn't have some kind of key/signing on the package I'd be very surprised.
1038  Other / Meta / Re: How to contact tomatocage on: July 20, 2015, 06:14:38 PM
-snip-
{...} but his only accusation on me is that he says I defrauded a known liar, and he's using the liar's word for it as "evidence".
 -snip-

Yes, TF is an untrustworthy person but at that time, you admitted to withdrew coins which were earned using bots and you named your bot "b0t" which makes me think you really know the rules. I also don't want to rehash my views/opinions here but you use "liar's word" every time which is not true.
If you don't want to rehash then you're going to have to avoid writing these kinds of half-truths which are as good as lies in that they mislead.  What I admitted to was experminting with a bot using TF's approval and knowledge, he even helped me with it.  Then him booting me and making up various and arbitary amounts that he said I owed him.  I never figured out if/whether I owed him anything because he wasn't reasonable to talk to about it.  He just said "pay back X" but everytime X was a different amount and often it was more than I had ever even owned at the time.  TF and I walked away from this 3 years ago and that was that but then QS comes along, with zero knowledge of the situation, and makes TF's false accusations his accusations.   And we all know that he did this not realizing that (1) I would make a stink and fight back on this nonsense (2) it would actually cost him reptuation points because he's siding with a known liar.  Now, 4 months later, I'm still dealing with it and you tell me what I should do MZ?  When someone falsely comes after you quoting some lies of a discredited person, are you going to roll over and delete your account?  Or are you going to stand up and say that what's going on is wrong and that you're being attacked?  I'm under attack from this dude for like 4 months now, he only last week made some threat against me.  I don't know what I'm supposed to do.
Quote

I have now sent him an email.  I did write to him last time he had QS on his list, but only once, and then he responded.  And it actually went well because he was able to convince QS to change his ratings to neutrals---presumably he was able to show him the reason in not blindly echoing tradefortress.  But as soon as QS was removed from his list he changed the ratings back to negatives and even opened a new account and trolled me with that.  As recently as last week he was making a threat against my---saying that "I would be stopped or else!".  In any case, now that TC has added him again, I'd like to speak with TC about getting QSs lies changed back to neutral---as he did last time.

Okay.

Pm blocked? Is that doable in this forum? He's online right now, and I'm not sure how can you approach him. Maybe quote some of his posts?

 -snip-

Serious questions, no trolling: Did he block you for harassing him about QS?
 -snip-

That's what I thought.

If writing to him once, receiving a reply, him replying that all is solved, I write back with "thank you for your intervention" is some kind of harrassment, then you guys are from another planet than me.
1039  Other / Meta / Re: How to contact tomatocage on: July 20, 2015, 05:47:17 PM
Pm blocked? Is that doable in this forum? He's online right now, and I'm not sure how can you approach him. Maybe quote some of his posts?

You can block members from messaging you.

Serious questions, no trolling: Did he block you for harassing him about QS? Since Tomato acts as a escrow, I doubt he blocks many people so there has to be a reason why you were blocked.
Serious answer: I seriously doubt it.  We discussed QS last time he was on his list and it was a very productive exchange of like 3 PMs where TC was able to convice QS to change his ratings to a neutral.  I would be very suprised if he decided to block me after those PMs.  Last once I received from him was saying "problem solved, please adjust your ratings accordingly" and I did so and changed mine to neutral as well
Quote
Let's see how long it takes for this thread goes from how to contact Tomato to QS is a evil man and should be removed from the DT list  Grin
I would like to avoid that.  I found that public sparring with QS doesn't help and I'd like to resolve this nonsense.

1040  Other / Meta / Re: How to contact tomatocage on: July 20, 2015, 05:40:16 PM
Pm blocked? Is that doable in this forum? He's online right now, and I'm not sure how can you approach him. Maybe quote some of his posts?
Pm is able to be blocked, someone who scammed me blocked my PM a time ago.
Just email him, or make a post like this, so he sees it pop up (if your names in the post he will likely read it)
Unless you are really that annoying, and he really wants to ignore you.
Quickseller is generally very trustworthy and is right 95% of his accusations, so maybe you are red for a reason.

I'll send an email.  But as for you advice that I make a thread like this one, well (t's already done!).

I'm glad you think he's generally trustworthy, and I know he often cites himself as having these 95% accuracy rates, but that info generally comes from him (or did you do some quantitative analysis of his accuracy?  if so, how did you get relevant data?).  But even if you're right that he's correct 95% of the time, I'm in the 5%.  I won't rehash the story here, but if you check into it you can see how he's been trolling me using 3 different accounts for almost 4 months now.  I don't know how to get him off my back but his only accusation on me is that he says I defrauded a known liar, and he's using the liar's word for it as "evidence".  QS is angry as fuck and vindictive as a mafioso---I've heard a lot from people in PM recently saying to me "thank you for calling out quickseller for his temper, I'd say something in public but I'm afraid he'd come after me".  Dude is a huge bully and I just want him to leave me alone.

tomatocage1@gmail.com is his email. Send him one or two emails. I highly recommend you not to message him a lot. He may have blocked you for sending a lot of messages. Did you do it last time when QS left you a negative trust feedback?

I have now sent him an email.  I did write to him last time he had QS on his list, but only once, and then he responded.  And it actually went well because he was able to convince QS to change his ratings to neutrals---presumably he was able to show him the reason in not blindly echoing tradefortress.  But as soon as QS was removed from his list he changed the ratings back to negatives and even opened a new account and trolled me with that.  As recently as last week he was making a threat against my---saying that "I would be stopped or else!".  In any case, now that TC has added him again, I'd like to speak with TC about getting QSs lies changed back to neutral---as he did last time.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 [52] 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 ... 221 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!