It's not just your imagination.  gorgon666 was outed as yet another QS alt some months ago.

Zzzactly!

That always makes gambling more fun!

In fact, it *is* guaranteed to lose in the long run, as long as you choose a sufficiently large interpretation of 'long run', like, say, infinitely large. 

You have a creative usage of the word "bug" here.  Here's the way this is supposed to work, if you don't like/trust the feedback given by 'yahoo62278', you should remove him from your trust list (ie, write "~yahoo62278" in your trust list).  If other people agree with you that yahoo62278 isn't leaving trustworthy feedback, they'll remove him too.

Still working, has been working every single time I've tried it over the last 5 years with the one or two exceptions (usually less than 1 day) when there was a DDOS attack.  The recent posts in this thread about DDOS were completely false, as far as I can tell.  Every single time that person said "site down" when I tried it I found I could quickly log in without issue.  I just logged in again now, still no problems.

BTW, anyone want to buy my level 8 account (half way to level 9), let me know.  I never use it anymore.

Lol, 'no official meaning'.  As if QS pronouncing something as "official" would give it "official meaning".  Always playing the king.  In case QS is truly ignorant about what is meant by "DT1" and "DT2", let's go ahead and define it like this:

DT1 is the list of people trusted by "Default Trust".
DT2 is the list of people trusted by someone on DT1.

Given this information, I imagine even Quickseller could guess what would be meant by a "made up word like" DT3, although, unless he pronounces it, he certainly won't consider such a meaning to be "official".  lmao

Maybe Quickseller is having a hard time selling signature space these days (-117 trust!).  Or maybe Lauda is neg-repping all his alts?  I dunno.

I admit I do find it satisfying that while QS can still troll and troll and troll, at least no one takes it seriously anymore.  Can you guys believe this dude was once on default trust?

You shouldn't have to run gpg as su.  Just FYI.

I think you guys are full at the moment.  Is there a waiting list?

Lol @Quickseller fail.

I have yet to see experience this guy's DDOS successes.  Every time he posts 'DT down' with some screenshots and a whois, when I try the game, it works fine.  I dunno.

Somehow they're already making enough money that the extra 10% here just fell below their radar?  I dunno.  It is surprising that they wouldn't stake on reasonably valuable POS altcoins that they support.

crypto-trade is such an obviously useful name for people who trade crypto that I suppose that just the fact that they used this name isn't signficant.  I think the people who had this original crypto-trade and who ran off with the money are long gone and we can't really expect them to come back.  If they do, they at least, will certainly use another name.

Yes!


This is how trust is meant to work.  xtraelv clearly doesn't trust cryptodevil, so cryptodevil clearly doesn't belong on his trust list. If others feel the same, they'll exclude him as well.

Wow.  Let's see you go.  So far your attacks have all been failures.  Not sure why you want to keep drawing so much attention to your own ineptitude.

Nothing will happen.  Trust system is unmoderated.  That's been said many many times.  People receive all kinds of nonsense feedback on here all the time.  Theymos (admin) has said many times that if someone is continuously giving out low quality feedback, the result will be that people will remove that person from their trust lists.  It's not supposed to be centrally managed, it's supposed to be an organic network of feedback and trusted-feedback.


This is probably your best bet.  If you actually have positive feedback from other people, then people will have to take cryptodevil's assessment with a grain of salt.  In any case, just don't worry about it.  Go forward and stand on your principles and let time shake it out.  I know absolutely nothing about this MLM thing you guys are arguing about, but from what I can tell, you wish to defend the concept.  Well, just defend it and go forward.  The negative feedback from cryptodevil doesn't affect your stance, I take it, so you guys have said what you wanted to about each other and that's that.  Right?

I've been on a long hiatus from dragons tale.  But to be honest, this guy who keeps failing at ddos keeps bumping the thread and is making me think about playing there more often.

I think you have something fundamentally wrong: there are no "free speech rights" on a private forum, unless the forum owner has granted such rights and even then, the forum owner could decide to revoke them at his or her whim.  Your "free speech rights" may apply to you in your particular country, or whatever,  but you don't have the right to write anything you please on someone else's forum.  This is a private club.

Hope this helps.

Exactly, I'm not sure I've ever seen such a big fail.  Especially with all the credit he's trying to take.  He bumps this thread everyday with whois reports (?) and says "#offline".  When, in fact, every single time I've tried to follow up to see if he's actually done anything, the game is online and working as normal.

In the end, he's probably helping DT with this:

1) People can see that DDOS protection is working fine
2) He keeps bumping the DT thread where people can observe (1).

Lol.