Its not Nicehash miner.
Nicehash miner don't archieve 320 sol/s with a GTX 1080, with this miner and a little overclock i get 450 Sol/s
with nicehash eqm 1.04, I have around 490 sol/s with a GTX 1080: you may talk about an earlier version or the generic nicehash package. |
|
|
|
900 is good it offer a good alternative in case zcash sink, what intensity are you using?
You find out when I release it. 900 is slow, the 1070 can do more i know but you see a 470 can do 850 with wolfo kernel, so in theory a 1070 should reach 1700 but that is too much i think there must be some sort of limitation like with etheruem when scaling 850 with custom bios mod hand tuned by wolf0 himself... |
|
|
|
We have another speedup ready, mostly beneficial to GDDR5X cards (Titan X Pascal will go over 600 for sure). Stock GTX 1070 gets 390 Sol/s.
We have decided to release source of miner and open it up to work on every pool in near future. We will prepare full statement why we have decided that.
Regarding linux: somewhere along the line of optimisations, linux version simply stopped working correctly (is giving incorrect results). We do not have enough man power (+ there are holiday times) to track down the issue, but I am sure community will find it and fix once we release the source.
Well done : very nice work with your optimisations and generous to share the source. Thank you very much! |
|
|
|
...
. Low and behold now not only is EWBF and Nicehash faster then Claymore, they're also more efficient. Getting almost close to 2x the hashrate of a 480, which is about on par with what speeds we should be getting. There are a lot of ignorant and uninformed opinions floating around the forums. They just go off of what they know and like 90% of the miners here are born from Ethereum AMD mining.
Agree with your points about dev. For amd/nvidia : amd lacks new high end cards (vega soon ?). I agree nvidia are more efficient, but not significantly faster. I am mining with a GTX 1080, a GTX 1070 (no longer) two fury-x, a RX480. The fury-x is doing 375 h/s which is as fast as nvidia GTX1070/GTX1080 but at 190w instead of 140-160. For now RX480 are not very good at equihash, but they are efficient at cryptonight (monero): without bios mod but mem OC: 730h/s at around 100w. The GTX 1080 could manage around 640h/s. |
|
|
|
Announcing bounty for a GPU Pool miner dev:
Donations to Account 2-34
If you want, include your alias as a "Public payload"
Distribution:
- 20% will be for Vorksholk due it created first GPU miner and made it open source (and we need to congrats him for his previous job, of course)
- 80% will be for GPU pool miner dev who creates an Open source GPU miner for pool mining.
Bounty will be sent when at least one well known pool accepts PASC to mine and source code published on GitHub
(If the pool wants to receive a bounty, the miner dev will need to give some of it's 80% part... negotiation miner dev vs pool dev is part of this bounty)
Currently donators are: - iscal -> 9999.0000 PASC - anorganix -> 195.4000 PASC Please contribute. Thanks. I would like to donate but : - gpu miner don't work on my configuration (amd fury x)(it works at first, but no longer work no matter what version of drivers: others miners works without problem on my pc) - no bitcoin adress for giving in btc The first one is probably not easy to fix The second one is very easy: could you add a btc adress please? Ok. I've created a BTC donation address: 19JeDyLYzGsvDCoY1dWKnEASRib67V7eiyPASC donation: Account 2-34Currently donators are: - iscal -> 9999.0000 PASC - anorganix -> 295.4000 PASC Total: 10294.4000 PASC Sent 0.03 btc : 7a20e89d71cb8124863db28190e5b21d939b8444d085eb85aee81ee97ef60238 PS: it seems the transaction doesn't confirm : I will resend it tomorrow if it fails. |
|
|
|
Announcing bounty for a GPU Pool miner dev:
Donations to Account 2-34
If you want, include your alias as a "Public payload"
Distribution:
- 20% will be for Vorksholk due it created first GPU miner and made it open source (and we need to congrats him for his previous job, of course)
- 80% will be for GPU pool miner dev who creates an Open source GPU miner for pool mining.
Bounty will be sent when at least one well known pool accepts PASC to mine and source code published on GitHub
(If the pool wants to receive a bounty, the miner dev will need to give some of it's 80% part... negotiation miner dev vs pool dev is part of this bounty)
Currently donators are: - iscal -> 9999.0000 PASC - anorganix -> 195.4000 PASC Please contribute. Thanks. I would like to donate but : - gpu miner don't work on my configuration (amd fury x)(it works at first, but no longer work no matter what version of drivers: others miners works without problem on my pc) - no bitcoin adress for giving in btc The first one is probably not easy to fix The second one is very easy: could you add a btc adress please? |
|
|
|
Hello,
I have the following problem with the opencl miner (cuda one works fine): when the miner start, trying to compile the opencl kernel, it fails with the following message:
C:\Miners\PascalCoin_OpenCL_ProxyMiner_v1\PascalCoin_OpenCL_ProxyMiner_v1>PascalCoinOpenCL_ProxyMiner.exe d0 p1 i23 c50
Found 2 platform(s) on your computer.
Devices on platform 0, "NVIDIA CUDA":
Device 0: GeForce GTX 1080
Devices on platform 1, "AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing":
Device 0: Fiji
Error -11: Failed to build program executable [ ]
Build Status: CL_BUILD_ERROR
Build Options:
Build Log:
error: 64-bit kernels not supported on a 32-bit executable
Frontend phase failed compilation.
Error: Compiling CL to IR
Does someone met similar problem ? (driver 16.10.1, windows 10)
Someone can help me on this ? are you using x86 windows ? Win10 64 home Up : try a lot of thing : I had an nvidia card and amd : I removed nvidia and uninstall all drivers and cleaned with ddu : try 15.12, 16.7, 16.10... Still same error (with 15.12, I hadn't this error but the program crashed at the begining). C:\Miners\PascalCoin_OpenCL_ProxyMiner_v1\Benchmark>PascalCoinOpenCL_ProxyMiner_Benchmark.exe Found 1 platform(s) on your computer. Devices on platform 0, "AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing": Device 0: Fiji Error -11: Failed to build program executable [ ] Build Status: CL_BUILD_ERROR Build Options: Build Log: error: 64-bit kernels not supported on a 32-bit executable Frontend phase failed compilation. Error: Compiling CL to IR |
|
|
|
I think the situation is good.
Looking back at when I followed your advices or sayings, I would say you have a far better "backtesting" on long term choices than short term trading... (best decision I take reading your posts and others during 2014 and later: invest in monero long term, worst one : selling a significant part when you predicted capitulation a few weeks ago). I do believe I warned against this and even opened a long. I remember it and felt a similar sentiment, but Risto was out of sorts - he was not measured at all, did not give the odds as he usually would. It was (and still is) 'possible' but even then I felt it was at best a 70/30 against a dip that low. Historically (yes, I know it's as good as a horoscope), XMR has dipped to lows in December, broken out in Feb, had an August high and then slid down. It has also normally reacted inversely a disproportionately to BTC price moves. What seems to be happening is the start of a less fixed inverse relationship and Monero reacting more to events in its own sphere, which makes sense as it matures. I do think the GUI will be positive and Ring CT implementation, if it goes smoothly, will show we have a great dev team. Both ETH and ZEC have blown it, albeit in different ways. XMR just steadily chugs on and if we stay above 0.01 for the rest of this month, it is hard to see us returning significantly below it again, bar 'black swan' or a BTC run of 2013 proportions. I was there in 2015 with the dramatic lows of XMR: I was afraid of similar scenario with the rising BTC trend and the decrease of XMR, I was hesitating selling a part of my 1000 xmr: maybe I would have sold even without rpietela alarming post... |
|
|
|
I think the situation is good.
Looking back at when I followed your advices or sayings, I would say you have a far better "backtesting" on long term choices than short term trading... (best decision I take reading your posts and others during 2014 and later: invest in monero long term, worst one : selling a significant part when you predicted capitulation a few weeks ago). Well the good news is you were selling it to him and he knows what to do with it better.  I sold only a few hundreds (on the other hand I have only around 1000: now around 800). I don't think he is a good day trader according to its post history : good at fudamentals but day trading is a different story. I have made my previous post to inform new comers to be cautious with this kind of advice: so they don't do the same mistakes as me |
|
|
|
I think the situation is good.
Looking back at when I followed your advices or sayings, I would say you have a far better "backtesting" on long term choices than short term trading... (best decision I take reading your posts and others during 2014 and later: invest in monero long term, worst one : selling a significant part when you predicted capitulation a few weeks ago). |
|
|
|
Announcing bounty for a GPU Pool miner dev:
Donations to Account 2-34
If you want, include your alias as a "Public payload"
Distribution:
- 20% will be for Vorksholk due it created first GPU miner and made it open source (and we need to congrats him for his previous job, of course)
- 80% will be for GPU pool miner dev who creates an Open source GPU miner for pool mining.
Bounty will be sent when at least one well known pool accepts PASC to mine and source code published on GitHub
(If the pool wants to receive a bounty, the miner dev will need to give some of it's 80% part... negotiation miner dev vs pool dev is part of this bounty)
Please add a btc adress : most dev prefers being paid in BTC (at least a mixt between pasc and btc). I would like to donate in btc. |
|
|
|
Hey folks, thanks for your PMs and your trust once again regarding a pool but as long as there is no miner for pooled mining there won't be a pool. Chicken egg problem  It would be good for the communauty to finance such a gpu miner and pay Vorksholk or wolf0... |
|
|
|
@Aetsen @Pascalcoin
We have 300 high end gpus mining power, holding 800k PASC, modded proxy and not going to 51% attack the network! Other questions?
Announcing that you hold 20% of all coins and are mining with that much hash power is also another way to jeopardize the future of a coin. One entity holding that much is not good and that much hash power causes other miners to stop mining and switch to something else which would give you even more control of the network.. I like coins like this with new tech or are different but they always seem to get gamed by one or two entities and slowly fade into the darkness. I'm not faulting you, just pointing out that you've done nothing positive for the future of this coin by posting what you are doing and how many coins you hold. I understand your concern, but at this level it is still ok to my opinion. Having a whale who have invested a lot in the coin may be good : it means serious investor believe in the coin and he should have a lot of motivation to promote the coin and help the developement/ marketing ... At some point, he will sell a part of his pack, and will diversify its mining farm. |
|
|
|
@Aetsen @Pascalcoin
We have 300 high end gpus mining power, holding 800k PASC, modded proxy and not going to 51% attack the network! Other questions?
Thanks for your clarifications. Globally reassuring. |
|
|
|
4770
start is 270 , after 10 min 200. what is it?
Miner will use all cpu cache available ( 2.52mb/thread). Others process may eat cpu cycles and cache : monitoring software, OS process (indexing, updates ...), antivirus, gpu miners ... leading to caches misses for the miner. EDIT: 2mb/thread instead of 2.5 |
|
|
|
EWBF miner 300 h/s 1080 61 C.... total power 73 %
So what...? With the price a 1080 cost I could get 3-4 rx470 so 600 to 800 sols/s  1070 can do 310 sol with 100watt, or 370 sol with 150watt, that is better than any amd out there, i'm still laughing thinking that there are poeple that believe amd is better... 1080 is doing 350 with oc with 150w, amd fury x is doing the same with undervolting without oc at around the same wattage. 1080 refurbished can be bought at around 550 euros, fury x around 350 euros. Both are good. But the fury x was mining at better speed since a few weeks... |
|
|
|
I'm trying to download the miner, but Google said it contains virus and denied my download request. It must be a false positive, but how can I download the miner? mega.co.nz doesn't work for me at all.
you may force the download within chrome : on the little box at the bottom of the window corresponding to the file dowloading : you can force the download (I am not at my pc, I can't remember the exact wording/actions, but I managed to do it). Otherwise use firefox. |
|
|
|
GTX 1070 is a poor choice for mining as it costs about 2x vs many RX 470 and some RX480 cards, but mines about the same hashrate.
The only reason I have a BUNCH of them is that my intended usage for them isn't mining - they're just mining to help pay their cost while the mining is profitable.
A GTX 1070 is very good card for gaming and mining as a hobby. For a gpu farm, semi professional mining, amd card are a better choice (less expensive -> less initial investment, similar hashrate on most important algo, but higher power usage, better ROI). A small miner may aims at less popular coins, without pools or big exchange and have a higher profit per card.... A gtx 1070 is very good for spreadcoin for instance (a small interesting coin on bittrex with low volume), or lbry ( not a small coin). |
|
|
|
The same problem with one my rig - Asrock H61 BTC Pro MB and four Gigabyte R9 280X. PSU best quality Corsair AX860.
V8 no problem, V9 - Win crashed after aprox. 30-60min. Intensity -i 0
You will have spike far above the average consumption. Your psu is very good and have some limitation on max current available as a security. With the spikes and an highly optimized miner, you will probably go over the limitation and the psu stop. You need to have a good margin on the psu side, like 30% above the average consumption to be OK. Good psu have some overhead margin too (like 10%): the whole combined should prevent any problems. Look there : http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-radeon-rx-480-polaris-10,4616-9.htmlDuring a gaming session you may have spikes at nearly 300W for a single card... |
|
|
|
I got about 1190 Accounts, are these actually worth anything ?
Don't just throw them. Remember not everyone is willing to mine .... They can be used as give aways for pascal related retweets or something.. Having said that... I'll take some off your hands if you don't want them Post your public key and ill send you some. How many you want? You should give some to pascalcoin dev for give aways and promo or for exchanges ... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
