Precisely.  (not sure about the crash so I removed that from your comment.)

I read somewhere that he was banned and using this account for now, but I am not sure. I think that account is TPTB_need_war.

You are quite right and we discussed this several times. Short term predictions from anybody are nothing more than pure speculations. Armstrong and others have no clue about the short term market. To be fair, Armstrong doesn't even try to be specific lately. He says: if this than that, everything is conditional lately. Though the long term view of analysts such as Armstrong or David Stockman still useful. I find David Stockman even more useful than Armstrong is. The man really knows the market. He had been telling with regards to the last 4 rallies that it is nothing more than a dead cat bounce. At the same time others were predicting new highs. He has been saying not after but during the rallies, make no mistake, this is just a dead cat bounce. He was right again, and at DJIA 18K the really was over. There is at least something specific from him. Stockman has been far more accurate and specific than Armstrong is, and his deep understanding about economy and the crocks of Wall Street is really useful in this nonsense casino market.

Tricky week ahead on the market. Now we had 3 consecutive down weeks. There were 4 consecutive down week only 4 times in the last 7 years, and most downside damage had already been completed after the 3rd week. Also, the two previous lows occurred following multiple lower highs, so the panic selling continued following a few highs - so far we had only one. This current downtrend is not convincing at all. In mid term I am with Stockman that it is a bear market.
In longer term, I understand what Armstrong expects that the US market will provide refuge for worldwide money, but I am not sure how Armstrong's super highs can work out in this bearish climate.

TPTB_need_war is not an idiot. In many ways he is the smartest here. The problem is, he is having the fixation that he can predict the BTC price, so he talks nonsense with regard to that. I pointed out several times in this thread how and why he is wrong about the BTC price, but he is not an idiot, and I am sure you know that.

You are wasting your time here Sergey. Your trolling can't irritate me. You are 37 years old, a virgin, you live in the shithole of Belarus and you are a very mediocre programmer. You manifest a rare combo of properties which makes me not to take seriously what you say, though the effort is noted and appreciated to a certain extent.

On the note of programming, have you fixed the problems I have pointed out in this thread? I had a quick look at your Java source and in a 30 seconds scan I spotted at least 5 major programming mistakes. Open a programming thread and I will teach you in real time how to write software. With your mediocre programming skills you are embarrassing all Russian programmers (I am not trolling, telling this seriously and with the best intention).

I hate nobody. I don't even hate David or Sergey, why should I? Sergey never had a woman, he is a 37 years old virgin. David is a dreamer who could never make the final table of a poker tournament, at the same time that's all he dreams about: winning a poker tournament. You don't hate such piteous young men, why would you. Their project is another matter. IOTA epitomizes the problems faced by the cryptocurrency movement. The so many pathetic wankers who came together around IOTA (and of course the another blatant scam LISK) and eagerly wait the P&D, those ultimate assholes with their 1 BTC investment talking nonsense about business (IoT) which they have no knowledge nor experience whatsoever - that irritates me, not David or Sergey. Satoshi's fine idea became the the playground of these chief wankers, the 1 BTC "investors" of these "projects".

I even fed up with Ethereum. Just as I am generally fed up with crypto (except BTC, though the fucking Chinese miners and the greed of those fucking corrupt, communist opportunists really test my unconditional support for BTC). You remember very well, I said everyone in August/Sept 2014, buy as much ETH as you can via the crowdsale. I made so much money for many friends - including you - who listen me in the VRC thread at the time with the ETH investment. Now I couldn't even bother with ETH, I exited it months ago. I liked so much Gavin Wood, I supported so much Vitalik, but I am so very much disappointed about the direction of ETH. The DAO project is just another nail in the coffin. Nonsense.  My rants and anger are not exclusive to IOTA. Generally crypto is heading to the wrong direction. These wankers with the LISK and IOTA signatures under their nick, and the IOTA, LISK shills are mainly responsible for that wrong direction. David and Sergey, or the LISK liars couldn't operate, couldn't make a disgrace from Satoshi's idea without the assistance of these pathetic 1 BTC volume "investors".

David, David ... you are deluding yourself, because nobody else believes in this forum nor in law enforcement that you indeed sold a software.

You were selling the IOTA tokens on the most notorious forum of the universe, which forum is exclusively dedicated to crypto currencies. You are continuously defending your failed record of delivery by saying that in fact you delivered 20x ROI already. It is quoted several times in this thread that you are proudly telling how big ROI you delivered. At same time, you also keep telling your investors that don't worry, you are talking to crypto currency exchanges to list IOTA. So there is an entity which was sold on a cryptocurrency forum, it has ROI and it will be traded on cryptocurrency exchanges. One would think over age 12 and having IQ over 55 that this is a crypto currency then - regardless how you call it. Still, you are deluding yourself that it can be a software, just because you call it software. No, it can't. You sold a financial security instrument.

EDIT:
The same apply to the blatant LISK scam. That wanker German lawyer who organised the whole scam labelled the investment as "donation". Calling it donation doesn't change the nature of the product - it is an investment security.

Yep. Wasn't it obvious from the beginning? I told you, the boy has zero experience in business and IoT. Then he collected money for an IoT business. Of course. All his experience is fraud and luring out money from the noobs, naive users and idiots by selling a coin which now - as he realized the law enforcement is after him - suddenly a software. It's not only "affect" the success of the project. A project doesn't need enemy when the CEO is such a hopeless momma-basement operator clown like David is.



Well, you will have more and more scam alert in the future, because the whole thing has been a scam. Read this thread back, it explains why the IOTA IoT and asynchronous processor comedy are scam.

PS:
I couldn't resist to make this comment. These scammers never fail to disappoint by being completely incapable to deliver anything. Btw the LISK scam is even worst and consequently it has attracted even more noobs, naive users and idiots.

I think they are progressing all right. Though I always said they have no more than 10% chance to succeed ... which is precisely 10% more than the majority of crypto projects, including the nonsense which you working on have.
Terms of the source code, terms of the lines of code, I have never counted but they have delivered easily 100x as much as IOTA has delivered. But I am sure Sergey you have already forked the whole thing because you have no IoT code, so you will have to copy it, which I am sure you did already.

I have been hearing the story from the GDC devs how the partnership with IOTA couldn't progress. At the same time, your partner David boy keep bullshitting your community about all kind of GUI devs which didn't deliver. Interestingly, David boy never commissioned the GUI design to the GDC devs who offered their help and can deliver, but David always paid for someone who of course couldn't deliver. Really? So the GDC devs told David that they can design the IOTA GUI easily. And then David went to some other devs who never delivered? It doesn't add up. When I read David's bullshitting about the GUI I start to understand he is even a bigger wanker that I ever thought he is. You understand that as well Sergey by now, if not your supporters will tell you every day from now.

Leave the sinking ship Sergey, the police will make you leave it anyway, it is better if you make the move to the right direction voluntarily.

I have not disappeared. The Gadgetcoin developers asked me if I support the GDC project publicly on this forum, then I should not be so hostile to other projects. Fair enough, point is taken on board. Therefore, I am focusing on what I am very good at. These are including but not limited to making women extremely happy and delighted in sex, playing in amateur golf tournaments and testing the newest collection of Scotch Whiskeys. I will let you all fine gentlemen know how these activities are going.

Sergey, you are trolling me again, but for the benefit of others, the IOTA scam is not a success story. Was the luring of money from the idiots an effective and efficient operation terms of getting the money? Surely it was in that sense, because you got the money, but getting the money via a fraud is not an achievement. (Having this discussion about success indicates what we are dealing with - normally you don't have such conversation, you can have this with only scammers and trolls). You can't put on your CV that "I scammed $500k from 230 idiots within 4 weeks and 5 days, and then told them that fuck off, you bought a software, hahaha" ... this is not what can be included in your CV - except if you present the CV to some other Belarusian scammers.

Oh please, where did you hear that freedom fighter story? Freedom means nothing to 99.9999% of Chinese. Otherwise China wouldn't be a corrupt, totalitarian, semi-marxist dictatorship.
None of the Chinese miners operate without the blessing of a corrupt communist party official. Like anything in China BTC mining is corrupt, unethical and controlled by the communist elite. Otherwise the virtually free electricity wouldn't be available for the miners.

Surely that's the case. That's why you monitor 24/7 when I come here to write something and then you show up to explain yourself. Pathetic really.



One of the issues among many is, that you don't do any work. No wonder you don't, you don't have any academic background nor any experience. Scamming the idiots with the help of these greedy shills is not a work experience, even if you are indeed effective in it.

Fuck off Sergey. My posts, deep thoughts, fine conclusions and spot on analysis were the only quality material of your thread.

You need a criminal lawyer son. You are a fraudster. Tough you are lucky, if you stay in Norway you will be shipped to a nice prison. Like that wanker Breivik who killed 77 innocent people, he has TV, computer, play station. Quite astonishing. You will have as well, but because you won't be isolated your tight ass will be penetrated daily bases by the horny prison population. Not that I have anything against gay people, we are not in the 1970s, just letting you know about your future sex life for that 4-5 years period.

Yes, they are in the IOTA thread that tries to sell some shit to the idiots. In reality it is either an investment product or a software. It can't be both. If it was, c'est la vie, we sold a software and it is your responsibility to make it work - that's what David said isn't it - then there cannot be investment, ROI nor an asset. Such two entirely different propositions could only coexists in the head of a confused shill or in the head of a liar. Pick which is applicable to you.

Oh dear, oh dear. What a stupid boy. The scammer thinks that calling the blatant scam a software sale and pay tax on the income save his ass. Oh dear. He thinks scammers and fraudsters don't have to go to jail if they pay some tax. Desperate and pathetic, like all scammers with no class. LOL he even paid tax.
 

The IOTA shill (sockpuppet?) Tobo admits it was a token sell "to become rich".

But it was just told you above, David was trying to explain really-really hard, there is no investment in IOTA, there is no asset in IOTA - it is a software product. It was not a get rich scheme. Not at all. You bought a software. How can a software product be a coin asset with ROI in the same time? Oh wait, perhaps David sold a coin, because he also said he is already delivered a 20x ROI ... for the software ... which is not an asset not a coin ... but there is an ROI. Oh boy ... how messy is this, even Tobo shill/sockpuppet nick can't get his head around what was sold.

Warning! IOTA shill alert.

When an "investor" say it is OK the devs spend the 500k for blackjack and hookers, then everyone can be pretty sure it is either a sockpuppet or a shill. Never mind the shill say it was token sold ... not a software.

The fine display of the pathetic struggle of a stupid scammer who try to mask a token ICO as a software sale.

First, you idiot admit that IOTA in fact is a financial instrument (albeit illegal one) and you delivered already 20x ROI. Then, you stupid fuck start the usual masking and pathetic lies to tell that in fact they bought a software. Which one is then you piece of shit? Is it a software which they need to make it work or is it a token which you deliver 20X ROI?

Yep. Give up man. You were scammed. Send your details with quoting IOTA to either the Norway, UK, US or Russian law enforcement. Following our submission all of them have opened a case for the blatant IOTA scam. More victims and complaints speed up the process and get the scammers to prison quicker.