So you basically want people to "Live stream" for you... but are you going to fund those streams like Stake.com are doing with their paid streamers? This is very expensive and a marketing option that are used when a casino is well established.

Which streaming platform still allow gambling streaming apart from Kick? (Owned by Stake.com)

The problem with the Nigerian economy has nothing to do with the US Dollar, but more with the government corruption and bad political decisions and appointment of friends and family in key government positions.

Nigeria is a Oil rich country and the citizens are supposed to be benefiting from that, but the spoils from that are flowing into the pockets of a few elites and the corrupt government that put them into those positions.

The 1400% return on investment sounds better when you devide it by the 4 years. It is 350% return on your investment per year.... which is almost 3 times more than what the S&P 500 achieved over the 4 year period.

The thing is, not a lot of people had the balls to buy those cheap coins during the price crash. (I did and I am smiling from ear to ear)

I assume this lottery are only for Russian people... right?

I tried to figure out what "system" will be used to draw the winners, but all information is just in Russian.  

You can give out free tickets as much as you like, but if you cannot prove that your method to draw the winners are not fair, then people will not participate.

I clicked in the little envelope to see if I can get online support and it was all in Russian too.

I stopped using bitaddress.org because I read somewhere that there were some flaw in the way that the wallet are created. (It grants skilled people the ability to figure out the private key?) 

The script based wallets should definately be backward compatible with the older legacy wallets.

Anyone have a new site that are similar to bitaddress.org that can generate safe Paper wallets offline?

You have to understand that most politicians and government employees are working in government for their own interest and not the interest of the public.

These politicians will look at a new technology to see what they can get from it, before they will support it. A lot of the coutries accepted Bitcoin, because they got something out of it. ( Russia can use it to bypass restrictions on global payments and some African countries accepted it, because they think "bribes" can be more anonymous." 

I am going to Cherry pick some questions and then answer them randomly.

Question 1 "How do you see women gamblers..."
Answer : I see no difference between the two genders. Every person is different and the gender makes no difference between how you gamble or how much you gamble.

Question 2 "How do you feel when you lose..."
Answer : I have a mixture of feelings that range from being sad and some times feeling anger. (Anger when I gambled too much and when I lose everything)

Question 3 "How do you spend your winnings.."
Answer : I seldom have anything to spend, because I gamble for entertainment and the money that are deposited or winnings, stay there so that I can play for a longer period.

The idea behind Bitcoin was never for people to just hoard their bitcoins, Satoshi wanted people to use it as an alternative currency and for those transactions to generate "Miners fees".

The "Miners fees" will become very important in the future, because the Block reward will be reduced to zero over time, with all the "Halvings" and increased "Miners fees" are supposed to replace it. 

A lot of people are very creative, but they are lazy too. I have seen some brilliant ideas coming from the most lazy people at my work.

A guy will for example write a batch file to run scripts to automate all their work and then quickly do the work that takes hours for other people to do.

So, you have to be a creative person and also a hard worker to implement your ideas and then sucess will follow.

Never offer signup bonusses for referrals, because they just signup with a throwaway account to claim the money and then they go inactive.

I tried this before with other websites and it cost me more in paid bonusses than what I gained through their referral commision.  

It might work better with brand new casinos, but with casinos that has been around for years, it never works.

Ok, let my paint the picture a bit better. 

There are multiple games running at the same time, allowing only active players to bet.. once you stop betting.. you go into spectator mode and you cannot share in the winning pot.

The highrollers are risking more money, by staying in longer ...so they can either win some of their money back or lose everything if they bail out early.

Bots cannot be used, because only verified accounts can participate. If you "verify" a bot, you still lose money while you are betting... and bots hate spending money to earn money.

There are the opportunity for a new player entering the game and betting a small amount and then the "Boss" are defeated and the treasure distributed between the team that defeated the "Boss" (So you can win something big, with a small amount of betting)

It is like a shared Jackpot being won by a team... and not a single player.

I have been around, since before 2014 and I have pulled the trigger on buying bitcoin, before it went crazy. Unfortunately I got greedy when the price went above $18 000 per coin and I sold the majority of my cheap coins.

I have bought some more coin since then, but at a much higher price, so my profit on those coins will be much lower. The most valueble thing I have gain is not money, but rather a wealth of new knowledge.

I think it is time for third party Slot developers to give us more multiplayer games.

Imagine a game where players can play the same slot game and where they "fight" together to defeat the "house" - They all fight and a percentage of the money goes into a single pot and the rest goes to the casino. The goal might be to defeat a "Big Boss" or a "Dragon" or a huge Alien ship .. and the team that takes it down, share the spoils. (The more you play or the higher you bet, the higher your percentage of the total winnings) - High rollers can come in, bet huge amounts.. fail to take it down and leave, the pot is then shared by whoever is in at the time when the "Boss" is defeated.

If you drop out, you lose your chance to get a share of the winnings. You never know when it will go down, because high rollers can come in at any time with bigger bets to take it down quicker. There will be multiple games at the same time, so you can jump in and out of different games or just concentrate on one game.



Do you think it will work and will it be more fun to play multiplayer games like this?

I do not know if anybody knows about Four-player chess (also known as four-handed chess) is a family of chess variants played with four people. ==> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four-player_chess .... this game made a 1 on 1 game more sociable and more fun.

Online gambling can do the same with their games, where people can start to play Slots against the "house" in teams. Very similar to multiple players trying to defeat a single "Boss" (like you see in multiplayer dungeon type games)

A lot of online casino sites have their own "Chat" facility, which brings in the social aspect of gambling. (This is very moderated and also very toxic at times) 

I think it is crucial for governments to focus on developing infrastructure for technologies that are based on renewable energy... before fossil fuels run out. The global economy will collapse or it will become VERY expensive, if the supply of fossil fuel runs out.... and if there are no alternative to supplement or replace it.

I also think a hybrid system can utilize the best of both worlds... so you can drive on petrol and electricity to increase your driving distances and also to reduce the transport cost and still use fossil fuel and use "clean" energy. (Solar / Wind / Hydro ....etc)    

The people who cannot safeguard their coins are invested in Bitcoin ETF's .... and the other people can buy hardware wallets for $100+ to do the same thing or browse to the sites that offer you offline scripts to create your own Paper wallets and print them for free.

Your solution is too expensive and too complex ... and most people do not want to go through all that trouble to zoom once a month and to "dox" themselves to be able to safeguard their coins.

Yea, having centralized financial institutions like BlackRock, locking 400 000 bitcoins into a centralized database is a big problem for many of us, but unfortunately we are the minority. The majority of the people do not see the danger or their judgement are clouded by greed, because they are "invested" in Bitcoin for the profits and not to promote Bitcoin as an alternative "currency" for the people.

In any way, if one person or group control the majority of the coins, people will start to move over to other Alt coins with more available coins and companies like BlackRock will have to start buying the more popular coins for their investors.  

I kinda see where you are going with this. Let's take the example of the thread that are somewhere on this forum, where you post the Bitcoin address linked to your account and where you sign that address with a message saying that you are the owner of that Bitcoin address and that Bitcointalk.org account.

So, people can hack your account, but they cannot sign that Bitcoin address that you used to prove that you were the original owner of that account. (You simply sign a message again and you have solid proof that you are the owner of that account)

It is just a added layer of protection for your account.  

I won a huge jackpot (Max Win) on a slot, but when I calculated my total deposits, it did not recover my losses from all those deposits.

You might think that a huge jackpot is life changing, but first calculate how much you gambled in total and then subtract your win from that. You might find that you are way in the red, when you look at the bigger picture.

We had a discussion about these complaints before and the conclusion is normally the same. The casino will be relaxed with the requirement of lower level verification, because it requires basic documents that are easy to verify.

When it comes to Level 3 and 4... it becomes more complex and the documents takes much longer to process.

Imagine someone owning a company that are using that company to launder money and you have to detect that, before they use your site to launder their dirty money. (It is just obvious that they will be more strict when we are talking about high amounts)

I am not saying this person are trying to use Stake to launder money, but I understand why Stake is more cautious when we are talking about huge transactions. (I hope he can find a good resolution to his problem, because I can understand his frustration...after reading all his posts)