|
Contact theymos about it and state your case to him. Maybe he will issue a sig ban but only he can do that.
|
|
|
|
Copy and pasting: NKOR’s groundbreaking technology for processing data, using a multi-layer index hashing
algorithm, will be implemented on blockchain for the first time, revolutionizing the existing system
of digital data distribution.
NKOR’s groundbreaking technology for processing data, using a multi-layer index hashing
algorithm, will be implemented on blockchain for the first time, revolutionizing the existing system
of digital data distribution.
|
|
|
|
|
There are two handled reports of you copy and pasting posts.
|
|
|
|
|
From the reports it looks like you posted about Atomic Swaps Exchange in Meta. Doesn't belong there and looks like spam anyway.
|
|
|
|
The report was for "Wrong section and it is not related to wallet software and crypto." No you can not without asking. This is a major flaw. It should say which mod deleted it in the message. Then you could message them directly. Also mods that are biased get to hide away deleting on topic relevant messages and you can not prove it is them that is doing it because they will never admit it even if you ask in public.
It's like that for good reason because mods would be spammed to death with why u remove mah post 24/7. My name is on several sub boards and it's ridiculous the amount of messages I get asking why I deleted their post or banned them because people automatically assume it was me who was responsible when the vast majority of times it wasn't and I have no idea what they're even talking about. If it stated who did what then mods would just be hassled even more. We just noticed our thread was deleted and there was not even a message about it either. Just vanished. Who is we? You and your split personality? |
|
|
|
When was the report? Any proof for the date?
Is it that an odd to use something that was made 2017 against me now? I know I made some mistakes way back but it's unfair to use that now after almost 2 years. why now? Isn't that a blackmail?
I've done so many great things on this forum over the years that should be enough to make it even, I don't believe what I did 2 years ago should be used to destroy my reputation now. I think someone very powerful is behind this.
I thought BitcoinTalk is a land of dreams, instead it's turning into something else.
I don't know the date. You'd have to ask an admin about that. Contact them and see if they'll change it to a sig ban instead which is sometimes given. |
|
|
|
So, what’s happening on 1 August 2017?
Even though Segwit allows for increased transaction throughput, not everyone is happy with its implementation. After BIP 91 was locked in, a group of developers, miners and users suddenly announced that an altcoin known as Bitcoin Cash (or BCC) will be created, a fork from the current Bitcoin branch and it will (among other things) not support Segwit.
At this time it is highly unlikely that Bitcoin Cash will have significant support from all the right stakeholders — miners, developers, platforms and users.
Most Bitcoin platforms, will not be supporting Bitcoin Cash. Customers who want access to Bitcoin Cash tokens will have to withdraw their Bitcoin from the platforms to a Bitcoin Cash-compatible platform before 1 August 2017. I can’t make any recommendations for any other platforms for now.
What do you think will happening next?
That's the thread that was reported and what you were probably banned for. |
|
|
|
Which mod deleted it?
I did. Feel free to rant all you want in your own topics, but quit derailing unrelated topics.  )This what I see after theymos post that to CH  via Imgflip Meme GeneratorHa. I never saw that one. Maybe that's why CH has sulked off pretending to be banned. I wonder if he did actually get a short ban or just took the hint and started on another. Maybe he thinks he can have a separate account for trolling to save the other: Nothing in that huge rant has really anything to do with the case involving HostFat and therocktrading. You mentioned HostFat, but you didn't actually address anything related to the topic; you just tried yet another filibuster on your DT talking points.
We see you doing this over and over again. There are 61 good reports against you in the last 60 days. You're going to get banned if you keep this up.
|
|
|
|
He was probably a higher rank and deleted all his posts.
This user recently woke up from a long period of inactivity.
Probably a hacked account as well.
In that case the user should have merit (airdropped), he can't delete the airdrop merit. And if he could wear the signature he had at least 1 merit. Or I missing something, let me think and edit this message if I can think about some strange cases. Good point. It probably had the sig and PT there years ago before the rule changes. It's still probably a hacked account though. |
|
|
|
|
He was probably a higher rank and deleted all his posts.
This user recently woke up from a long period of inactivity.
Probably a hacked account as well.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think you should leave, but again, I don't think you will 100% and will just use other accounts. Good luck either way.
|
|
|
|
I thought it was harsh personally as I certainly wouldn't lump you in with the mass of yobit shitposters, but you were pushing your luck with the repeated off topic posts in my opinion. But the "pushing his luck" isn't why he got included in this mass ban. I know a troll who has been pushing his luck for many months now, and still isn't banned. If you're talking about Cryptohunter I would agree also. Not sure why he's currently feigning a ban though and trolling on other accounts but an admin should look into it. |
|
|
|
|
I thought it was harsh personally as I certainly wouldn't lump you in with the mass of yobit shitposters, but you were pushing your luck with the repeated off topic posts in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
Hello Darkstar,
Username: Skieleton
Post Count: 1001
BTC Address (must be SegWit): 3GaDX99Voc4LSu3wizyQwCxmfgyGi6R8Y3
Please let me know about acceptan. Thanks.
You are probably not going to be acceptaned. |
|
|
|
Not really "these people are banned: ...". (Though I have been thinking about adding a function to ban specific users from your selfmod threads.) Please do. Most people probably self-mod threads to only keep a handful of certain people out in the first place and you have to keep deleting those that do anyway. This would solve their issues rather than staff having to get involved. Most of the trollspam from cryptohunter happens in Meta, which doesn't allow self- moderated topics. I had to lock this topic when it completely derailed from the user who ignored my local rules. Which reminds me, since the troll is now spamming with his alt-accounts, I'll see if I can unlock it again. That's why I don't think 'local rules' should apply in Meta and why I don't personally enforce them. People shouldn't be able to moderate their posts how they like in here. If they want a direct response from staff they can just PM them about it. Most threads these days are just done in public for attention seeking or trolling and it's getting tedious. |
|
|
|
Not really "these people are banned: ...". (Though I have been thinking about adding a function to ban specific users from your selfmod threads.)
Please do. Most people probably self-mod threads to only keep a handful of certain people out in the first place and you have to keep deleting those that do anyway. This would solve their issues rather than staff having to get involved. |
|
|
|
You might as well ignore this unless things change and the admins start enforcing those guidelines, but if we do nothing then campaigns like Yobit will take advantage of that. They seemingly don't even have a campaign manager and if they don't then we all know what will happen.
Don't worry about that, because we might see Yobit has its official campaign manager. However, I really think that we should stop spam the Meta board by over discuss about Yobit campaign. Let it be and we will see how it will end. Forum staffs already knew about it.  That doesn't mean they're going to be managing the campaign. They didn't before and that was the problem. |
|
|
|
Campaign Participants:
Staff do not want to hand out bans for unconstructive posts but if we feel that you as a user are continually making very poor or unsubstantial posts due to your paid signature the following bans will be issued:
First offence: 7 days
Second offence: 14 days
Third offence: 30 days
Fourth: Permanent ban
Campaign Operators:
If you are running a campaign and it becomes blatantly obvious to Staff that you are doing little to nothing to stop spam on your campaign you will be issued a PM warning by a Global Moderator that you need to make immediate improvements to curb low-quality posts. You will have 7 days to remove low-quality posters and respond to the message detailing what you are going to do to make changes to your campaign to reduce the amount of spam. If improvements are not noticeable within 21 days of that and Staff do not believe you are doing enough to prevent low quality posts your signatures will be blacklisted from the forum by an Admin and you will no longer be permitted to advertise here in such a way. YoBit should receive a warning and the majority of their campaign participants should receive a 7 day ban, immediately. Their posts are clearly nonconstructive and unsubstantial, and YoBit are quite clearly doing nothing to curb this behavior - quite the opposite, in fact. Paying for 20 posts per day is encouraging spam, not limiting it. The rules are very clear in the stickied thread I've quoted above. Lets start enforcing them. You might as well ignore this unless things change and the admins start enforcing those guidelines, but if we do nothing then campaigns like Yobit will take advantage of that. They seemingly don't even have a campaign manager and if they don't then we all know what will happen. Someone already banned that user for post-bursting and it's his second ban, but he's also ban evading as a previous account is permabanned. Optional: if you think the spam is really getting out of hand, you can probably give the user red trust.
Eh, as much as I'd love to tag shitposters, Theymos does not want members doing that, DT or not. The only thing that should be done if you notice someone spamming/shitposting is to report their post(s) to the mods and let them deal with it. Staff shouldn't have to be left to do this. We basically become unpaid campaign managers having to do others perople's dirty work whilst they sit back and reap all the profits. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
